►
From YouTube: Governance and Risk | Ep. 155
Description
Introduction
@LongForWisdom: Hosting, Introduction, Agenda.
Weekly Updates
Poll + Executive Status - @LongForWisdom
Forum at a Glance - @gov-comms-core-unit
Core Unit Updates
Governance - @GovAlpha-Core-Unit
Protocol Engineering - @Protocol-Engineering
Oracles - @Oracles-Core-Unit
Risk - @Risk-Core-Unit
Real World Finance - @Real-World-Finance
Growth - @Growth-Core-Unit
Content Production - @Content-Production
Governance Communications - @gov-comms-core-unit
Sustainable Ecosystem Scaling - @SES-Core-Unit
MIPs
MIPs - @MIP-Editors
A
Hello,
everyone
and
welcome
to
the
make
it
out
scientific
governance
and
risk
meeting
number
155
taking
place
on
thursday
august
19th
at
1700
utc.
My
name
is
long
for
wisdom.
I'm
one
of
the
government's
associates
at
make
a
dao
I'll
be
chairing
this
meeting
today,
oh
yeah
and
I'm
joined
by
a
bunch
of
make
people
some
new
people
as
well,
which
is
awesome,
don't
always
see
new
faces
super
often
so
yeah
welcome
to
the
new
people
yeah.
A
As
always,
we've
got
a
bit
of
an
agenda
to
get
through
lots
of
updates
from
our
core
units,
some
stuff
on
mips
yeah,
but
nothing
too
crazy
in
terms
of
segments
or
anything.
Yet
so
if
we
get
through
the
updates
early
we'll
go
into
a
you
know,
general
qa
and
stuff
so
yeah.
For
this
I
don't
know
a
couple
of
general
rules
about
this
meeting,
feel
free
to
interrupt
or
ask
questions
we'll
kind
of
pause
fairly
fairly
regularly
for
questions.
A
A
Let's
immediately
so
we
had
three
green
light
poles
which
are
in
progress
for
korres,
global
fintech
fund
drop,
nebula
capital
partners,
drop
and
capital,
now
kind
of
a
strop
yeah.
All
three
of
those
have
10
plus
days
remaining
so
yeah.
If
you
haven't
voted
plenty
of
time,
but
please
do
I
think
yeah.
So
a
couple
of
them
are
currently
failing
and
one
is
currently
succeeding.
Oh
no,
sorry
one
is.
A
Yeah
two
are
currently
following:
one
is
subsidy,
so
please
vote
on
those.
If
you,
if
you
feel
strongly
about
royal
asset
control
in
terms
of
executives,
we
still
have
the
executive
from
the
week
before
last
yet
to
pass.
If
you
haven't
voted,
please
consider
doing
so
includes
yeah,
always
call
unit
budgets
and
some
housekeeping
stuff
and
some
sort
of
minor
parameter
changes
and
we'll
have
we're
planning
to
have
another
executive.
This
friday,
which
will
include
yeah
a
whole
bunch
of
stuff.
A
A
D
All
right
so
welcome
everybody
to
the
forum
at
a
glance.
A
recap
of
what's
happened
on
the
maker
forums
for
the
week
of
august
13
to
19..
Let's
begin
with
the
announcements,
starting
with
payton,
announcing
governance
skipping
the
weekly
executive
last
week
for
various
reasons
provided
in
the
post.
The
executive
for
august
20th
tomorrow
will
contain
a
bundle
of
content
from
both
weeks.
In
addition,
he
asks
the
community
for
feedback
concerning
the
communication
of
executive
cancellations
provided
by
the
gov
alpha
core
unit.
D
Next
up
maker
man
announces
his
delegate
platform
of
intentions
to
help
grow,
make
the
dow
into
a
trillion
dollar
entity
by
pushing
security,
reliability
and
transparency
of
the
protocol.
By
looking
at
the
micro
and
macro
lens
of
things,
then
we
have
christian
peterson
from
real
world
finance
core
unit
who
published
an
assessment
of
potential
structures
for
maker
protocols,
adoption
of
real-world
assets.
D
D
Next
up,
alec
from
content
production,
core
unit
published
die
and
different
networks,
number
six,
which
provides
the
community
an
overview
of
die,
circulating
on
non-eth,
blockchains
layer,
two
roll-ups
and
various
bridges
first-time
poster
voice
from
if
or
no
is
asking
the
community
for
some
funding
to
help
with
his
expenses
for
their
ethereum
focus
con
and
czech
republic.
Their
goal
is
to
address
new
users
and
provide
education
through
informational
talks
and
networking,
and
finally,
ace
was
the
first
to
let
us
know
when
die
outstanding
blew
through
the
6
billion
mark
awesome,
jumping
into
active
discussions.
D
D
We
have
lucas
who
seeks
community
feedback
and
comments
on
his
update
for
progress
by
centrifuge
and
their
priorities
going
forward
next
up
primos
from
the
risk
core
unit
presents
the
first
adjustment
proposal,
along
with
some
analysis
for
decreasing
liquidation
ratios
for
various
fault
types.
The
risk
core
unit
team
decided
to
skip
the
signal
pull
for
these
changes
due
to
a
lack
of
objections
during
their
initial
post.
D
There
was
only
one
signal
request
this
week,
where
sam
suggests,
following
dydx
and
permanently
removing
flashman
fees,
to
help
improve
both
arbitrage
for
die
and
front
end
user
experience.
This
comes
with
a
risk
of
potential
lost
revenue,
but
dydx
has
shown
its
liquidity
pool
increased
almost
10-fold,
which
is
large
enough
to
cover
most
use
cases.
D
A
A
All
right
we're
going
to
call
unit
updates,
then
we'll
cover
quickly
and
then
we'll
move
on
to
more
interesting
people.
Yeah.
So
three
highlights
this
week.
I'm
just
kind
of
giving
a
brief
update
on
delegation
to
start
with
so
go.
Alpha
has
started
tracking
delegates
participation
in
communication.
These
metrics
show
up
on
the
photomakadow.com
voting
portal.
Currently
these
are
both
calculated
manually
in
the
future.
A
Participation
will
be
automatic
because
that's
something
that's
fairly
easily
automated,
but
comms
will
probably
just
remain
manual
because
that's
much
harder
to
automate,
see
subix,
and
I
did
that
this
week
on
monday.
So
thanks
tim
for
helping
with
that
we're
also
still
working
on
getting
custody
platform
integration.
So
we
can
sort
of
unlock
delegation
for
some
of
our
larger
holders
yeah.
A
If
they
need
a
hand,
you
know
understanding
the
contracts
etc,
and
I'm
hoping
the
I'm
not
sure
if
this
has
happened
yet,
but
I'm
hoping
the
delegates
themselves
can
sort
of
start
like
adding
them
on
twitter
and
sort
of
saying
hey.
Can
you
can
you
like
integrate
like
delegation,
please
and
also
potentially
like
nadia,
and
the
growth
core
unit
can
lend
a
hand
as
well
sort
of
push
you
down
over
the
next
few
days
yeah.
A
A
Yeah,
so
I'm
reviewing
those
peyton's
working
on
documenting
the
like
governance
votes,
hashing
stuff
so
like
for
those
who
don't
know,
we
hash
the
contents
of
polls
and
executives.
In
theory,
people
can
like
take
these
hashes
and
go
check.
That's
what
is
being
displayed
in
the
ui
matches.
What's
launching
in
practice,
I
don't
think
anyone
does
this,
but
we're
like
figuring
we're
writing
out
like
the
process,
so
that
if
people
want
to
do
it,
they
can.
A
A
Looking
to
he's
looking
to
do
kind
of
mips
and
forum
organization
stuff,
a
little
bit
more,
as
I
mentioned,
gala
has
been
doing
doing
well
on
the
maker
operational
manual.
Might
try
and
sort
of
expand
responsibilities
she
can
take
up
her
master
availability
allows
and
then
yeah.
As
I
said
again,
astro
and
micro
breaker
have
been
doing
some
documentation,
also
a
couple
of
leads
on
like
additional
sort
of
personnel
so
sort
of
following
up
on
those,
but
a
bit
a
bit
early
to
say
anything
for
sure.
A
A
E
A
E
E
Cool,
no
just
just
the
the
items
just
rattled
them
off.
We
have,
of
course,
the
the
pax
psm
matic
collateral,
reducing
the
ilk
liquidation
ratios
that
just
went
through
the
6x
6s
broker,
dealer
address
and
yanking
our
own
deployer
address,
and
then
the
calc
tab
in
the
change
log,
which
is
just
a
a
small
update
to
make
onboarding
a
little
bit
easier.
So
the
team's
pretty
heavily
focused
on
that
this
week.
E
Other
things
we've
been
working
on
to
give
a
summary
of
being,
we've
been
doing
an
asynchronous
edge
review
on
the
g-uni
oracle.
So
we've
got
a
team
meeting
next
tuesday,
just
to
sort
of
wrap
that
up.
We've
made
some
small
enhancements
to
the
omega
poker
that
optimizes
the
order
in
which
collateral
prices
are
updated.
E
So
there's
just
a
few
outstanding
tasks
there
to
wrap
up
real
world
asset
support,
remove
some
permissions
updates
and
change
log
versions
and
general
tidy
up
so
we're
quite
moving
along
quite
well.
There.
We
also
wrapped
up
some
ether
scan,
spell
verification,
improvements
for
mainnet,
covan
and
gurley
this
week
as
well.
E
In
terms
of
collateral,
we
deployed
matic
to
covan,
and
I've
still
got
a
little
bit
of
work
to
do
on
the
state
debt
ceiling
limits.
We
had
a
discussion
on
monday
about
this
one
that
we
just
want
to
define
some
debt-filling
limits
for
sustained
eats.
So
I
hope
to
add
that
to
the
forum
post
that
tao
created
quite
some
time
ago,
in
terms
of
other
discussions
this
week,
I'll
leave
the
institutional
volts
parameter
discussion
to
nadia
or
can
jump
in
later.
E
Just
prior
to
this
meeting,
we
had
a
discussion
around
talking
through
the
technical
approach
that
we
want
to
do
with
those
guys
and
the
work,
that's
involved
and
quite
a
little
bit
more
a
bit
more
effort
to
do
there,
but
that's
moving
along
nicely
so
yeah.
Anyone
else
from
the
pe
team
want
to
jump
in
with
anything
else.
That's
keeping
you
busy.
E
A
E
B
B
A
H
H
H
You
know
no
comment
on
on
how
you
know
secure
the
thing
was,
but
it
was
it
looked
really
solid
in
terms
of
the
the
implementation
that
it
used.
The
the
problem
that
we
identified
really
quickly
was
that
it
was
not
gas
efficient
and
that,
even
though
we
could
have
probably
fumbled
it
around
a
bit
to
make
it
a
little
bit
more
efficient
that
the
there
was
just
a
fundamental
kind
of
design
characteristic
of
the
implementation
and
how
it
kind
of
uses
and
verifies
merkle
proofs.
H
You
can
prove
that
that
was
the
data
that
was
on
chain
right
with
feeds
right
you're,
just
getting
a
consensus
among
among
the
feed
kind
of
validator
set
of
of
what
they
think
is
is
the
truth.
So
in
terms
of
decentralization,
it's
probably
a
little
bit
worse
to
use
feeds,
but
in
terms
of
using
code,
that's
never
been
hit
before
for
millions
of
dollars,
it's
probably
safer
to
use
the
the
feed
implementation
anyway,
and
we
already
trust
the
the
feed
model
for
for
everything
else.
H
H
So
so
that
was
a
really
long-winded
way
of
saying
that
we
should
have
the
feed
based
back
end
for
staked
keith
done
within,
hopefully
within
the
next
week,
and
then
we'd
need
maybe
a
week
or
so
for
for
testing,
but
that
shortly
after
that,
we
could.
We
could
probably
on
board
steak
teeth,
and
I
and
I
say
that,
knowing
that
I'm
kind
of
the
the
on
the
oracle
side
that
I'm
kind
of
the
blocker
here.
H
So
if,
if
someone
else
has
a
blocker
that
that
ends
up
happening
right,
don't
quote
me
on
the
the
two-week
number.
But
as
far
as
me,
unblocking
the
process-
that's
that's
what
we're
looking
at
a
couple
assessments
going
out
later
this
week
right
we
have
the
the
uniswap
v3
die,
ustc
assessment,
the
solar
x
assessment
and
I
believe,
there's
there's
one
more
so
we'll
have
those
out
by
by
the
end
of
tomorrow.
H
So
that
means
that
they
can
go
out
for
for
pulling
votes
on
on
monday
in
terms
of
the
oracle
core
unit.
We
are
we're
organizing
two
off
sites,
so
one
is
going
to
be
in
the
end
of
september.
We're
gonna
meet
up
in
reykjavik,
and
most
of
us
actually
have
never
met
up
in
person,
because
we
we
hired
a
lot
of
people
at
the
foundation
during
the
pandemic.
I
Nick,
I
was,
I
was
wondering
I
was
reading
about
the
cross
chain
oracles
that
are
coming
into
the
market.
I
think
this
one
called
the
switchboard
there's
another
one
called
the
piff
network.
That's
where
I'm
pronouncing
it
right,
and
I
was
wondering
if
that's
something
you
guys
are
looking
to
do
in
the
near
future.
I
I
think
what
they
claim
to
do
is
they
connect
like
hi-fi,
you
know
high-fidelity
market
data
to
the
decentralized
world
and
they're
also
looking
to
do
it
to
the
cross
chain
right
with
all
these
other
l1's
kind
of
doing
things
together.
So
I
was
wondering
if
that's
something
you
guys
are
thinking
about
doing
in
the
near
future.
H
H
That's
that's
not
really
a
big
technical
lift
for
us.
I
do
think
we
still
probably
need
a
kind
of
cohesive
strategy
on
which
chains
we
should
target
and
kind
of
support,
maintain
support
for
so
I
don't
think
you
know
going
after
all
of
them
at
once
is
probably
the
the
best
idea
either
right
better
to
just
choose,
say:
okay,
you
know
we
want
a
bit
big
on,
say,
optimism
or
polygon,
or
I
don't
know
solana
or
something
right.
H
Now
I
think
you
brought
up
an
interesting
point:
re
like
high
fidelity,
so
on
chains
right
that
are
more
scalable
than
ethereum
right.
We
can
have
much
tighter
kind
of
latency
pricing
or
kind
of
pricing
latency
on
those
chains
right
so
on
something
like
solana
right
where
transactions
are
super
cheap.
You
know
we
could.
You
know,
update
every
10
bips
or
something
like
that
right
versus
on
something
like
ethereum
right.
That's
that's
cost
prohibitive
right.
H
So
we
only
update
every
every
half
a
percent
spread,
but
so,
if
there's
any
chains
that
you
think
are
particularly
promising,
would
you
know
you
can
reach
out?
I
would
love
to
kind
of
hear
what
what
you
have
to
say
and
and
why
you
think
that
particular
chain
is
something
we
should
focus
on,
but
but
at
the
moment
we're
still
trying
to
figure
out
kind
of
where
the,
where
the
the
industry
is
heading
in
terms
of
where,
where
people
are
migrating
to
or
where
people
are
kind
of
expanding
to.
I
Yeah,
so
here
I
was
lurking
around
the
jet
protocol
discord
in
our
forum
actually,
and
they
actually
are
considering
you
know
one
of
our
our
nemesis
and
somebody
else
brought
up
obviously
oracle's
core
unit.
So
now
we
take
a
look
at
jet
protocol,
they're
they're,
trying
to
decide
right
now,
the
community
and
what
they're
going
to
use.
So
obviously,
you
know
chain
link
is
the
front
runner
right
now
from
what
I've
read,
but
yeah
reach
out
to
them
and
and
just
circling
back
to
stakeh
real
quickly.
I
H
So
when
we're
talking
about
steak,
eath
we're
talking
about
the
the
lido
steak
to
eat
in
particular,
so
when
you,
when
you
stake
with
lido
right,
you
are
you're
not
staking
yourself.
Basically,
right
like
they
are
running
the
the
validator
node
and
your
staked
eath
is
basically
just
a
an
iou
right
that
you
can
go
to
lido
and
redeem.
You
can't
actually
redeem
at
least
not
until
post
merge,
so
instead,
what
lido
does
right
is
incentivizes
liquidity
right
between
staked,
eath
and
and
eath.
H
So
for
all
intents
purposes,
the
staked
eath
token
is
just
an
iou
token,
and
so
you
are.
You
are
inherently
trusting
in
lido
right,
not
to
have
some
kind
of
screw
up
where
a
bunch
of
stuff
gets
slashed,
but
if
a
bunch
of
stuff
were
to
get
slashed
right,
the
staked
e
price
would
would
drop
right
because
they,
you
know,
feasibly
they'd,
probably
be
insolvent
to
some
degree
right,
because
you
could
not.
They
could
not.
H
You
know,
handle
all
the
redemptions
that
they
you
know
would
owe,
and
so
there
would
not
be
a
kind
of
one-to-one
redemptions.
So
I
don't
really.
I
don't
particularly
think
it.
It
matters
right
if
you
get,
if
you
take
out
a
loan
and
stake
deep
and
you
get
liquidated,
it's
not
a
big
deal.
Someone
else
just
buys
up
the
the
iou
right.
A
J
I
think
we'll
also
see
some
scenario,
analysis
which
will
be
made
by
mark
who
just
recently
joined
real
world
finance,
and
this
analysis
will
show
how
this
kind
of
worlds
could
impact
maker
on
on
fee
collection
going
forward,
which
is
essentially
the
you
know,
one
of
the
main
decision
points
at
offering
these
kind
of
vaults
of
of
particular
sizes
and,
of
course,
essentially
community.
It
will
be
up
to
community
and
maker
holders
to
decide
about
this.
J
Then
polygon
team
also
reached
out
asking
for
a
100
million
loan
size
that
would
be
collateralized
by
their
treasury
medic
tokens
and
because
such
loan
of
such
size
would
probably
need
to
have
a
higher
higher
collateralization
requirement
or
higher
liquidation
ratio.
Then
the
new
world
just
being
onboarded
right
now.
We
thought
it
might
be
better
for
them
and
for
maker
to
actually
set
up
institutional
type
of
world.
So
this
is
the
type
of
world
which
has
origination
fees
and
has
these
special
requirements
regarding
liquidation
ratio
and
maintenance
of
collateralization
ratio.
J
So
we
actually
just
had
a
discussion
with
them
about
this
type
of
world
and
agreed
to
present
with
some
broad
terms
and
conditions
for
this
wall
type,
and
we
see
whether
this
interests
them.
So
we
know
whether
onboarding
of
this
kind
of
institutional
type
of
world
for
polygon
becomes
priority
on
our
site
and,
I
believe,
on
protocol
engineering
side.
So
we
have
follow-up
calls
on
this
next
money
supply
money
supply
should
soon
make
two
posts.
One
is
regarding
dust
limits.
J
A
Cool
yeah.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
guess
a
bit
of
a
bit
of
maybe
not
fair
question,
but
have
you
considered,
I
guess
the
whole
like
treasury,
like
faults,
type
thing
for,
like
any
other,
like
tokens
other
than
matic
like
there,
any
others.
Do
you
think
they're,
like
kind
of
good,
like
kind
of
prospects,
I
guess
to
chase
in
that
area.
K
K
K
K
We
try
to
get
it
as
soon
as
possible,
but
it
might
be
delayed
to
the
end
of
sunday,
so
we
saw
that
it
would
better
to
if
we
don't
achieve
to
get
it
on
friday
to
give
one
a
week
to
the
community
to
review
all
the
documentation
and
all
that
before
submitting
the
governance
pool.
So
we
will
not
want
to
rush
too
much,
even
if
the
borrower
side,
I
will
not,
are
not
super
pleased
with
that,
but
I
think
it's
better
to
not
rush
things
and
lastly,
yeah
mark
is
working
on
an
institutional
vault
analysis.
K
B
B
K
B
K
K
K
B
Yeah,
that's
fine,
but
like
a
lot
of
these
are
really
serious
issues
that
we
have
talked
about
for
months
and
we're
just
now
getting
a
legal
review.
So
now
that
we
have
it
that's
a
great
first
step,
it
should
have
been
the
first
step,
but
now
that
we
have
it,
how
do
we
constructively
move
forward
to
limit
our
risk
to
these.
K
So
yeah,
so
so
on
the
timeline
of
the
legal
review,
I'm
not
a
legal
core
unit
and
we
don't
have
one.
So
it
was
not
my
decision
to
onboard
the
centrifuge
set
without
a
legal
review
like
it
was
not
my
decision
to
on
board
all
assets.
We
have
without
legal
review
and
to
my
understanding.
Currently,
there
is
exactly
zero
criteria
with
a
legal
review,
because
there
is
no
regard
in
it
and
moving
forward.
You
can
decide
what
I
would
say
whatever
you
want
all
right.
Well,.
B
Don't
get
it
let's
just
let's
description,
let's
just
table
that
for
the
moment.
So
moving
forward
to
address
these,
it
looks
like
we
need
to
sit
down.
Have
our
our
makers
representation
sit
down
and
come
up
with
some
alternative
language
for
these
right,
so
why
didn't
is
centrifuge
going
to
pay
for
these
legal
bills
too,
because
it
looks
to
me
like
we're
paying
the
legal
bills
for
a
structure
that
they
should
have
had
ready
to
go
at
the
beginning
of
the
year.
K
B
K
B
So
we're
sitting
at
a
point
where
we
have
already
authorized
44
million
dollars
of
exposure
to
something
we
didn't
have
a
legal
review
until
now,
it
has
lots
of
problems
in
it
and
we're
going
to
pay
more
legal
fees
in
order
to
fix
what
they
should
have
done
correctly.
The
first
time
is
that
is
that
correct.
B
Is
engaging
lawyers
to
work
together
with
you
to
make
improvements
to
the
structure
paper?
If
you
want
to
put
it
that
way,
you
can
but
no
like
this
is.
As
as
sep
said,
we
are
both
working
on
that
together
and
maker.
Has
certain
requirements
and
centrifuges
certain
requirements.
Our
asset
originators
have
certain
environments,
we're
all
making
sure
that
we
find
the
best
solution
moving
forward,
and
that's
that's
what
this
this
on-chain
securitization
roadmap
is
about.
B
G
B
So
paper
just
like:
let's
keep
this
out
of
this
discussion
for
now,
because,
like
it's
absolutely
irrelevant,
there
is
also
an
ongoing
effort
to
build
specifically
a
legal
structure
by
maker,
that
is
only
usable
by
maker,
for
solar
x.
Right
maker
has
very
there's
very
much
precedent
for
building
actually
the
legal
frameworks
that
you
need
and
to
have
that
be
done
by
maker
on
maker's
dime.
This
is
not
except.
E
K
B
B
I
would
really
feel
much
more
comfortable
if
there
is
a
third
party
in
the
room
who
can
at
least
observe
any
discussions
between
real
world
finance
and
centrifuge
on
how
to
fix
this,
not
me,
but
let's,
please
find
someone
else
who
can
independently
report
to
the
dow
how
these
negotiations
go
forward,
because
I
don't
feel
that
we
were
dealt
fairly
with
the
first
time
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
this
time
and
I
don't
have
any
new
information
from
here.
So
just
you
can
have
the
last
word:
yeah,
okay,.
E
K
B
B
A
Yeah,
so
when
we
continue
that
and
forum,
if
you
again
maybe
wish
to
kind
of
try
and
figure
out
a
third
party
that
would
be
willing
to
do
this
right,
so
yeah
for
the
time
being,
let's
table
that
and
move
on
any
other
questions
or
comments
on
the
crowdfunding
site
before
we
move
to
growth
like
we
mentioned
success,
a
couple
of
times
like
I
think
greg
is
here
greg.
Do
you
have
any
comments
on
success
or
happy
to
move
on.
L
So
I
I
wanted
like
to
share
with
you
one
of
our
ideas
for
the
rest
of
the
year
and
is
to
replicate
one
of
the
things
that
we
did
in
in
argentina
that
it
was
to
find
one
strategic
partner
and
try
to
create
with
this
partner
a
product
that
could
like
fix
something
in
the
country.
That
partner
was
when
beat
and
well
after
two
years
working
with
them
like
they.
L
They
created
like
this
awesome
product
around
dye,
offering
to
argentinians,
and
now
they
are
expanding
their
business
to
other
latin
american
countries,
a
solution
where
they
could
save
their
money
and
die
and
get
yield
over.
The
balancing
diet,
actually,
like
compact
argentinians,
are
using
one
beat
as
a
bank.
So
as
soon
as
they
receive
their
salary,
they
are
converting
the
their
salary
into
die.
L
So
we
are
trying
to
find
these
strategic
partners
in
different
countries
to
create
a
product
that
fits
the
market
they
want
to
target,
and
this
is
something
we
are
starting
to
do
with.
I
am
token,
which
is
a
wallet
in
china
actually
a
couple
of
years
ago.
I
think
we
when,
when
the
gas
fees
were
not
a
problem,
we
launched
a
campaign
with
them
and
we
have
like
a
lot
of
a
in
that
time.
Cdp's
open
through,
I
am
token
so
with
them.
L
We
want
to
understand
what
we
can
do
with
the
chinese
market
and
increase
their
awareness
through
them,
but
not
just
like
start
talking
about
diet.
The
same
way
as
we
talk
about
diet
in
latin
america,
but
trying
to
understand
how
diet
could
fit
into
the
chinese
market
so
we
are
going
to
we
have
we
prepared
a
plan
to
execute
with
them
in
the
next
months
for
for
the
for
the
rest
of
the
year,
the
other,
the
other
one
that
I
wanted
to
talk
with.
All
of
you
is
bitpay.
L
Jen
created
a
a
post
in
the
forum
asking
for
everyone's
feedback
because
we
beat
with
big
pay.
We
want
to
create
a
campaign
to
increase
the
usage
of
die
in
that
platform,
and
I
don't
know
if
you
read
jen's
post,
but
it's
funny,
because
apparently
people
who
use
dye
you
use
dye
to
like
buy
luxury
things
like,
for
example,
renting
jobs.
L
So
that's
that's
good.
The
users
are
like
interesting
people,
and
I
also
want
to
give
a
welcome
to
brazil.
He
is
joining
the
team.
Actually,
he
joined
the
team
yesterday
and
he
will
be
covering
europe
with
gustaf
and
his
background
is
super
interesting
because
he
comes
from
the
traditional
financial
markets.
He's
like
very
used
to
work
with
the
institutions.
L
So
his
user
in
the
forum
is
achieving
you
can
like
say
hello
to
him
in
the
forum
and
maybe
bourbon,
if
you
want
to
like
contact
contact
him
and
give
him
give
him
some
love
with
the
welcome
cheat
pack,
it
will
be
great.
The
start
of
the
week
is,
we
are
going
to
be
participating,
jen
actually
will
be
participating
in
the
web
3
fashion
week.
So
it's
like
a
big
nft
conference,
where
different
creators
in
the
fashion
and
art
will
be
talking
and
jen
will
be
talking
about
white
guy
and
maker
around
nfps.
L
Also,
you
can
find
a
tweet
of
the
week
and
we
want
to
like
because
well
in
the
in
the
forum.
I
just
talked
about
just
a
couple,
or
maybe
just
one
integration,
one
partner,
but
actually
in
the
week
we
have
a
lot
of
integrations
so
in
in
our
in
our
maker
dao
growth
in
your
maker
growth,
twitter.
You
can
find
a
lot
of
these
new
integrations
and
also
well.
I
hear
that
primoge
and
derek
mentioned
something
about
institutional
bulks.
L
I
didn't
include
it
in
the
updates
that
you
will
find
in
the
forum,
but
it's
like
this,
like
we
thought
about
institutional
bolts
as
a
bolts
that
could
like
have
different
risk
parameters,
because
where
we
were
like
expecting
like
larger,
larger
amounts
of
dye
minted
from
those
faults,
so
we're
starting
working
with
nexo.
You
all
know
about
that
and
at
the
same
time,
thanks
to
the
visibility-
and
this
is.
L
Yes,
like
one
of
the
first
ones
interested
in
in
open
and
institutional
vote
with
their
token
treasury
is
polygon,
but
yes,
we
also
have
other
projects
that
will
be
interested
in
doing
something
like
that,
and
I
think
this
is
good
to
start
like
to
think
about,
because
sometimes
you
we
were
just
discussing
with
pretty
much
that
in
the
case
of
polygon.
Maybe
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
have
a
regular
maker
vault
for
matic,
because
everyone
is
using
their
matic
inside
the
polygon
network.
L
So
this
is
interesting,
and
I
think
this
opens
a
lot
of
new
opportunities
for
us
when
we
want
to
onboard
a
token
as
collateral.
Maybe
we
shouldn't
just
like
do
it,
as
we
always
do
have
like
a
regular
vault,
but
maybe
we
could
like
think
about
having
institutional
votes
first
and
then,
if
we
see
that
their
community
will
be
interested
in
having
like
a
normal
vault,
we
could
go
for
that.
L
We
want
to
launch
that
product
as
soon
as
possible,
so
we
can
start
testing
this
d3m
into
the
avid
v2
market,
because,
depending
on
the
results
and
depending
on
how
we
see
that
this
this
is
working,
we
could
also
expand
the
d3m
into
the
ave
arc.
That
is,
they
are
the
four
institutions
so
that
that
will
bring
dye
to
these
private
pools
for
institutions
and-
and
that
will
be
also
something
super
exciting
for
for
the
protocol.
I
F
F
F
And,
lastly,
we
have
conducted
a
lot
of
the
brand
research
interviews.
If
you
haven't
already
please
schedule
one
with
us,
we
are
currently
working
on
discussing
and
figuring
out
how
to
summarize
and
follow
up
on
that,
essentially
in
the
forums,
so
keep
your
eyes
out
for
that,
and
otherwise
we
have
upcoming
amas
with
both
planet
x
and
the
centrifuge
team
that
will
be
announced
soon
and
here's
a
link
for
that,
and
otherwise,
if
anybody
has
any
questions
or
anything,
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
those
now.
F
Potentially
right
now
we're
kind
of
discussing
a
structuring
of
the
team
in
different
regards
based
on
a
lot
of
the
needs.
We've
fielded
from
the
community,
including
with
the
market
marketing
forum,
informal
poll
that
we
had
up
and
we're
also
following
up
on
that
in
the
same
post
with
the
brand
research
stuff
in
terms
of
the
structuring
of
the
team
right
now
we're
kind
of
deciding
which
directions
we
should
go
in
terms
of
those
responses.
More
or
less
does
that
make
sense.
G
Yeah
indeed-
and
I
do
not
need
screen
access,
because
I
am
just
going
to
read
my
bullet
points
that
I
have
today
so
yeah-
hey
everybody-
I
am
david
utrobin,
the
facilitator
of
govcoms
and
I
posted
our
first
bi-weekly
update
in
the
chat,
so
you
could
feel
free
to
follow
along
and
actually
get
like
slightly
more
descriptive
information
about
the
points
I'm
about
to
share
all
right
cool.
So
some
quick
updates
setup
is
moving
slow.
G
We
still
haven't
gotten
our
first
disbursement
of
die
due
to
the
delayed
executive,
but
that
is
okay,
so
yeah.
That's
one
point
next
point:
we
have
three
new
contributors
being
trained
for
the
call
summary
team
so
welcome
andrea
suarez,
rhodey
and
zainab.
So
yeah,
it's
cool
to
see
the
summary
team
expanding
slowly.
G
We
also
have
our
continuing
our
hunt
for
an
engagement
lead.
So
if
you
know
any
rock
stars
that
would
be
interested
in
such
a
role.
It
involves
a
lot
of
like
stakeholder
relations,
engagement
and
also
like
mapping
maker
down
and
stakeholders.
So
it's
it's
a
pretty
interesting
role
and
so
yeah
we're
hunting.
G
Let
me
take
a
breath,
so
we
actually
are
hunting
on
two
fronts,
so
we
have
the
talent
cu
from
that's
being
incubated
under
cess,
helping
us
and
then
likewise
in
parallel,
I'm
doing
my
own
independent
search
for
this
person
and,
generally
speaking,
applicants
are
are
pretty
few.
It's
been
pretty
challenging
to
find,
find
decent
fits
for
this
role,
but
there
are
some
so
we're
gonna
continue.
The
hunt
maker
relay
got
a
facelift,
so
we
have
a
new
banner
thanks
to
cat.
G
Also
we
created
a
basic
govcoms
core
unit
overview
presentation
in
our
public
drive.
So
our
previous
one
was
in
figma
and
it
was
a
little
outdated.
So
you
know
in
order
to
just
increase
the
transparency
of
what
our
team
does
and
all
that
I
put
together
just
a
bunch
of
slides.
I
actually
took
the
example
from
scs
because
they
recommend
doing
this
and
so
yeah.
G
We
did
that
also
yeah
lots
of
updates
for
us,
so
we
also
started
a
team
updates
audit
with
the
goal
of
making
some
actionable
recommendations
to
bring
us
all
closer
to
similar
standards.
This
is
mostly
because
I
was
trying
to
understand
what
to
put
in
these
updates
from
our
team,
so
I'm
just
studying
everybody's
updates
and
and
trying
to
make
some
documentation
around
it
to
see
really
like.
G
What's
the
word,
I'm
looking
for
like
an
at
not
an
at
a
glance
view,
but,
like
a
you
know,
a
higher
view
of
everything,
so
we
could
see
really
what
teams
are
doing,
what
they're
not
what's
working?
What's
not
what
information
is
coming
across?
What's
not
yeah,
also
in
the
last
couple
weeks,
at
some
point
I
met
with
mario,
our
reddit
mod
discuss
his
ongoing
availability
and
our
moderator
needs,
as
well
as
the
general
state
of
reddit.
G
We
also
met
with
dimitru
from
the
former
foundation
tech
ops
team
to
discuss
info
security
best
practices
for
google
drive.
As
some
of
you
know,
our
mandate
includes
the
lofty
goal
of
mapping
maker,
dao
and
its
stakeholder
segments,
and
so
we
intend
to
collect
the
identity
and
contact
information
for
maker
dao
and
its
stakeholders,
and
so
yeah
information
security
is
definitely
top
of
mind
and
we're
being
proactive
about
how
we're
going
to
be
managing
this
project
and
yeah.
That's
it
for
that
and
then
lastly,
but
yeah.
G
So
that's
the
entire
update
and
our
office
hours
are
fridays
1800
to
1830,
utc
and
so
feel
free
to
join
us.
If
you
want
to
get
to
know
us
a
little
bit
more
ask
us
what
we're
doing
or
inquire
about
any
of
the
things
that
I
mentioned
just
now,
and
so
with
that
opening
up
two
questions
from
from
you
all.
G
D
A
C
Yes,
thank
you
long,
hi,
everyone
juan
from
sustainable
ecosystem
scanning,
quick
update
from
us.
As
on
the
x-ray
research
that
we're
doing
last
week,
we
had
jordan
lenka
presenting
the
preliminary
findings,
it's
already
on
our
public
folder.
So
please
go
there
and
join
us
and
the
incubation
side.
We
have
a
lot
of
updates,
while
first
of
all,
dax
is
going
live.
C
So
that's
the
design
and
ux
core
unit
that
presented
their
mipset
and
it's
already
in
rfc
in
the
forum.
Please
go
give
feedback
if
you
have
any
and
they're
already
building
the
governance
portal.
So
a
lot
of
interesting
updates
and
thanks
everyone
that's
giving
feedback
over
there.
The
next
one
is
immunify.
C
And
the
other
thing
I
would
say
in
the
incubation
program
is
that
tomorrow,
we'll
have
nikolai
presenting
what
the
program
is,
what
we're
doing
and
what
not
so
very,
very
happy
about
that.
Please
come
join
us
at
2.
30
utc
in
our
ses
public
updates
call
the
next
one
with
the
community
pretty
of
the
busy
weeks
a
couple
last
and
then
becoming
as
well.
C
But
yesterday
we
had
the
real
world
assets:
collateral
boarding
with
capital,
now
cannabis,
a
canadian
firm
trying
to
help
yeah
firms
that
are
growing
the
cannabis
industry,
and
then
we
had
seb
derivo
presenting
mib
58,
so
the
wwra
foundation
next
wednesday.
Okay,
the
date
is
wrong.
Sorry
about
that,
but
next
wednesday
25th
we're
going
to
have
another
mipsix
for
real-world
assets
and
we're
going
to
have
a
bmc
actually
coming
on
and
explaining
how
the
deco
protocol
works.
C
We're
mainly
going
to
be
focusing
on
the
technical
part.
We
still
don't
want
to
go
into
the
mip.
So
if
you
guys
are
interested,
it's
going
to
be
agents
going
to
be
published
soon,
tm
and
the
last
ones
coming.
We
will
have
the
team
from
startnet
coming
to
present
on
september
the
1st
and
yeah.
We
we
have
tax
and
strategic
happiness
to
confirm
date,
also
soon
tian.
C
A
Thank
you.
One
doesn't
sound
like
there's
too
many
questions
right
now,
so
we'll
move
on
we're
a
little
short
on
time.
So
yeah,
I'm
not
gonna,
be
a
lot
of
time
for
discussion,
but
we
just
need
to
get
through
our
our
mips
update
first,
which
I
think
should
be
quick,
because
this
it's
mainly
just
middle
of
the
cycle
right
now
pablo.
Are
you
doing
this
update?
M
Cool,
let
me
give
you
yes,
that's
that's
the
case.
There
isn't
much
to
report,
I
kind
of
put
together
a
quick
presentation.
It's
a
pretty
bad
presentation.
Actually,
I
didn't
have
much
time
to
work
on
it.
For
those
who
don't
know
my
pc
died
yesterday
and
I
had
to
go,
buy
a
new
one,
which
was
a
bit
more
difficult
because
of
reasons
okay.
M
M
If
you
haven't
left
your
feedback
on
these
ones,
yet
please
go
do
and
yes,
we
are
currently
at
the
third
week
so
they're
very
much
to
to
report,
but
please
go
to
the
mips
portal.
If
you
haven't
already
use
it
run,
some
queries
check
the
options
on
the
menus
and
leave
your
feedback.
All
you
have
to
do
is
click
on
this
fix
updated
button.
It's
very
easy!
Yes,
please.
Please
help
me
with
that.
M
A
A
A
Oh
that
she
reminds
me
of
another
thing.
I
should
call
out
probably
planning
to
have
a
meet
your
delegate
meeting
next
week.
I
believe
for
mega
man.
I
won't
be
present,
but
they'd
not
be
running
it
in
my
instead
and
yeah.
So
I
believe
it
will
be
one
hour
later
than
the
time
we
used
for
the
previous
weeks.