►
From YouTube: Governance and Risk | Ep. 150
Description
Agenda:
https://forum.makerdao.com/t/agenda-discussion-scientific-governance-and-risk-150-thursday-july-15-17-00-utc/9331
Introduction:
Hosting, Introduction, Agenda - @prose11
Weekly Updates:
Governance - @GovAlpha-Core-Unit
Protocol Engineering - @Protocol-Engineering
Risk - @Risk-Core-Unit
Oracles - @Oracles-Core-Unit
Real World Finance - @Real-World-Finance
Growth - @Growth-Core-Unit
Sustainable Ecosystem Scaling - @SES-Core-Unit
MIPs - @MIP-Editors
*Disclaimer: These calls and the summaries are produced and hosted by MakerDAO community members. Content produced by the community are not the statements or views of the Maker Foundation.*
A
All
right,
hello
and
everyone,
and
welcome
to
the
maker
scientific
governance
and
risk
meeting
number
150
happy
to
have
such
a
milestone,
be
hosting
call.
My
name
is
peyton.
I'm
pros
11
on
the
forums,
one
of
the
governance
facilitators
for
maker
dao,
we're
joined
by
a
bunch
of
awesome
people
in
the
ecosystem
and
interested
generally
and
what's
going
on
at
maker
and
looking
forward
to
another
wonderful
call.
A
So
kick
off
this
week.
I
guess
I'll
do
a
little
governance
recap
on
what's
been
going
on,
but
before
that
a
reminder
that
we
encourage
questions
we'll
be
doing
a
lot
of
roundups
and
reports
on
what's
going
on
in
the
community.
So
if
you
are
have
a
question
about
anything,
that's
discussed
feel
free
to
either
raise
it
in
sidebar
or
unmute
and
ask
it
when
a
time
is
appropriate.
A
We
will
be
asking
for
questions
and
I'm
happy
to
read
them
off,
for
anyone
who
doesn't
have
a
mic
or
otherwise
doesn't
want
to
unmute
awesome
yeah.
So
in
terms
of
governance
last
week
one
important
thing
is
executive.
From
two
weeks
ago,
we
were
still
waiting
to
pass
we're
within
four
thousand
mkr
of
getting
that
pass.
So
if
you
haven't
looked
at
that,
I
would
greatly
appreciate
you
taking
a
look
and
supporting
that
there.
A
There
are
a
few
different
things
on
there,
but
it
does
include
core
unit
budgets,
so
a
lot
of
core
units
are
waiting
for
their
funds.
Currently,
we
had
three
polls
that
concluded
this
week
and
all
of
them
passed.
First
one
was
adjusting
the
flap
auction
parameter,
we'll
basically
be
lowering
that
from
60
minutes
to
30
minutes.
A
That
is
our
surplus
auction,
basically
about
how
long
it
takes
for
the
auction
mkr
to
to
end
so
look
for
that,
most
likely
in
in
this
week's
executive
we
have
an
increase
to
the
new
silver
debt
ceiling,
our
reward
asset,
zero,
two
ilk.
We
were
raising
that
from
5
million
to
20
million,
again
expected
for
this
friday
and
finally,
we
had
onboarding
matic,
that's
polygon
as
a
new
vault
type.
A
Like
I
said,
all
those
pass,
the
manic
will
likely
take
some
work,
so
probably
looking
first
or
second
week
of
august
there
before
that
gets
into
the
executive.
But
that
is
on
the
plate
for
preparation
now
yeah,
so
that
covers
the
governance
things.
I'm
gonna
pass
it
over
to
long
for
wisdom.
The
senior
governors
facilitator
for
an
update
on
what
gov
alpha
has
been
up
to
this
week.
B
Oh
man,
that
makes
me
sound
old
yeah
just
briefly
before
against
that,
like
commenting
on
the
executive
again,
so
like
so
paper
impairment
in
this
life,
I
was
saying:
can
we
not
show
it?
B
I
guess
comments
which
is
kind
of
out
of
the
given
that,
like
we
can't
really
tell
people
to
vote
for
it
because
that's
being
not
neutral
so
I'll,
maybe
meant
that
to
say,
like
please
favorite
or
like
get
in
touch
with
me
and
tell
me
that
you're
not
voting
for
it,
because
so
far
nobody
has
done
that
so
yeah
like
I'm,
I'm
pretty
convinced
that
it's
mainly
just
from
apathy
rather
from
like
actual
objection
but
again,
if
anybody
wants
to
so
talk
to
me
and
like
set
me
straight
on
that,
please
do
I'd
literally
love
to
hear
from
anyone
who's
not
voting
for
me
for
it
anyway.
B
Moving
on
to
yeah
go
out
for
highlights.
B
B
So
we
now
have
a
launch
date
of
the
second
of
august
I'll
be
doing
an
announcement
post,
probably
on
monday,
which
will
kind
of
sort
of
more
formally
tell
everyone,
but
yeah
we'll
be
scheduling
like
meet
your
delegates
meetings
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks,
probably
starting
next
week,
yeah
and
there'll
be
like
more
more
sort
of
forum,
docs
and
sort
of
stuff
being
made
public
very
soon
delegation,
so
yeah
very
close
now,
which
is
good
well
quite
close,
still
still
two
and
a
half
weeks,
but
quite
close,
which
is
great,
so
other,
highlights
several
source
code
things
either
here
are
coming
so
peyton
posted
a
technical
design
for
source
grid,
moving
more
of
it
on
chain,
as
in
the
forum
that
was
produced
by
kevin
and
seth,
I
believe
from
squid.
B
B
All
right,
that's
everything
from
me
back
to
you.
A
Excellent,
so
we
typically
do
a
forum
at
the
glance
kind
of
report
on
what's
going
on
in
the
forum
and
this
week,
cephex
prepared
that
and
I
believe,
is
ready
to
present
it
to
the
call.
If
you're
around
civics.
C
D
C
C
C
C
A
Awesome
thanks
for
that
updates,
alex
and
yeah
great
job,
putting
it
together,
so
we'll
get
on
with
our
updates.
I
believe.
First,
we
have
protocol
engineering
and
see
your
camera
pop
on
chris.
Take
it
away,
yeah.
F
Yep,
hey
everybody
chris
from
protocol
engineering,
so
we
published
a
collateral
evaluation
for
the
staked
f,
that's
probably
worth
reading,
because
it
may
impact.
I
don't
know
what
how
much,
how
much
risk
we
assess
to
it,
whether
or
not
we
want
to
add
it
that
sort
of
thing.
F
So
so,
if
you're
ever
going
to
read
one
definitely
worth
paying
attention
to
for
collateral
on
boarding,
we've
been
working
on
the
centrifuge
drop
tokens,
so
we've
got
four
centrifuge
assets
in
line
right
now
been
a
a
lot
of
back
and
forth,
no
like
major
errors,
but
we're
just
trying
to
like
massage
the
centrifuge
additions
to
be
to
be
like
really
turnkey.
F
So
we've
come
up
with
like
a
whole
sort
of
checklist
for
validating
centrifuge
editions
and
and
where
the
sort
of
covants
fell
to
be
like
the
main
nut
spell
and
the
config
to
be
easy
enough
to
add
multiple
kinds.
And
so
I
think
I
think
the
centrifuge
guys
just
finished
the
covan
version
after
some
feedback
right
before
this
call-
and
I
also
was
deploying
the
sort
of
mainnet
versions
of
the
contracts
that
they
need
but
ran
out
of
gas.
F
Like
five
minutes
ago,
so
I
need
to
deal
with
that
now,
so
I'm
thinking
for
centrifuge,
so
this
week's
executive
is
probably
just
gonna,
be
what's
in
the
polling,
but
we'll
include
likely
the
dead
ceiling
rays
for
new
silver
and
and
we'll
get
the
kovan
assets
out
this
week,
and
then
it'll
probably
be
next
friday
that
we
end
up
doing
the
mainnet
exec.
Sorry
lucas,
we're
you
know
we,
I
think
we're
gonna
slip
on
this
friday,
but
but
we're
in
a
good
position.
F
Oh
good,
oh
good!
Thanks
for
the
update
and
and
then
so
for
the
sushi
lp
tokens,
there
was
a
bit
of
a
miscommunication
with
the
sushi
team,
so
the
pairs
that
we're
interested
in
adding
they're
not
moving
over
to
the
sushi
masterchef
v2
contract.
Yet
which
means
we
had
kind
of
were
prepared
for
it.
But
it's
going
to
be
a
few
months,
so
I
think
we're
going
to
deploy
with
the
old
style
instead
and
so
we're
kind
of
working
on
on
getting
all
of
that
ready
to
go.
F
There
were
some
changes
and
then
we
have
to
update
the
sort
of
we
have
to
get
liquidations
ready
for
these.
So
we
had
to
update
the
exchange,
kali's
contracts
and
we're
gonna
have
to
make
the
keeper
updates
as
well
for
layer
two.
We
had
the
official
announcement
of
dye
optimism
bridge,
which
is
huge
and
I'm
super
excited
about,
and
I'm
like
losing
sleep
thinking
about
it.
F
So
I
hope
everyone's
excited
about
the
potential
here
and
we
did
a
bunch
of
like
reviews
just
to
make
sure
that
everything
was
denied
correctly
or
relied
and
denied
correctly
on
the
bridge
and
and
whatnot.
So
the
next
milestones
for
l2
are
going
to
be
arbitram.
F
We're
going
to
start
looking
at
this
sort
of
optimism,
fast
withdrawal
and
publishing
like
how
to
do
that,
and
and
maybe
working
on
that
and
also
a
an
l2
risk
framework.
So
look
forward
to
that
and
and
the
thing
that
I'm
like
losing
sleep
over
is
thinking
about
multi-collateral
dye
deployed
to
like
optimism
and
arbitrary
and
whatnot.
So
so
I
I
you
know
the
future's
bright.
F
So,
with
regards
to
institutional
vaults,
we
have
been
working
kind
of
like
with
growth
in
a
a
few
other,
like
cross
teams
to
sort
of
define
what
this
would
mean
and
and
so
we've
got
like
a
mock-up
of
this
dss
charter,
which
is
sort
of
the
this
initial
implementation
is
going
to
allow.
F
You
know
for
these
kind
of
traditional,
I'm
sorry
institutional,
like
faults
to
to
be
created
or
permission
faults
or
or
whatnot.
So
we
also
wrote
some
of
the
the
like
jim
join
stuff
around
that
and
I
think
we're
just
gonna
have
to
go
back
and
discuss
more
with
the
other
teams
about
what
we're
gonna
do
quick
note
on
test
nets.
F
Last
week
I
kind
of
soft
announced
in
this
that
we're
going
to
gourley
and
everyone
should
speak
up
or
hold
their
piece,
so
we're
we're
committed
to
corley
and-
and
I
want
to
do
a
shout
out
to
tim,
who
managed
to
score
us
20,
000,
gourley,
f,
so
we're
off
to
a
good
start
and
we'll
we'll
start
like
you
know,
making
a
deployment
plan
for
getting
everything
onto
gourley
and
then
for
next
week.
There's
a
number
of
team
members
that
are
gonna
be
at
scc.
F
If
you're
there,
you
can
meet
up
with
them
and
chat,
wrench
attack
them
whatever,
and
that's
sam
derrick,
bartek
and
chris.
So
especially,
if
you
want
to
talk
like
l2
stuff
like
you've
got
a
good
team
there
and
so
it'll
be
great
and
yeah,
and
then
there's
a
variety
of
meetings
scheduled
for
that
week
as
well,
while
we're
there
like,
with
darkware
and
nexo
and
and
others.
F
So
that's
about
it
for
my
side,
if
there's
anyone
else
on
the
political
engineering
team
that
want
to
bring
something
up
feel
free.
If
anyone
has
any
questions,
feel
free
to
ask
so
daddy
sterling.
F
Hey
chris,
can
you
hear
me
yep
yep?
I
got
you
hey
a
few
things.
I
heard
a
rumor
that
folks
are
trying
to
monetize.
I'm.
D
G
D
F
Yeah,
I
haven't
thought
a
lot
on
those
topics,
but
reorgs
are
an
interesting
problem
when
it
comes
to
liquidations2o,
because
we
have
a
price
decrease
function
which
is
based
on
the
block
timestamp.
So
in
theory,
if,
like
you
get
these
kind
of
like
deep
reorgs,
you
could
end
up
in
this
place
where
yeah
and.
E
F
Just
thinking
of
this
off
the
top
of
my
head,
let's
say
you
go
like
10
minutes
and
then
someone's
able
to
reorg
10
minutes
worth
of
of
the
blockchain.
That
would
that
would
be
a
pretty
big
reorder
by
the
time
that's
finished.
It
would
unwind
the
liquidation
that
happened
in
those
blocks
and
and
the
price
decrease
function
would
it
would
actually,
you
know,
be
a
little
bit
lower
than
10
minutes
later
so
so
there
could
definitely
be
some
fallout
from
reorg
style
stuff.
F
I
I
don't
think
we've
thought
through
all
of
the
sort
of
heavy
implications
of
of
like
a
a
strong
like
new
york
regime,
but
but
I
don't
think
it's
great
so
yeah
we
can
maybe
take
that
offline
and
discuss
more.
As
for
the
first
one
I
I
kind
of
like
there
was
like
maybe
some
noise
in
your
background,
you'd
ask
something
about
maybe
gourley
or
I
didn't.
I
didn't
quite
get
where
you're
at
monetization
yeah
yeah.
F
So
I'm
not
entirely
sure
I
mean
that
the
monetization
of
it
would
be
monetizing,
goeth,
right
and-
and
that
was
looking
like
that
was
it
stressed
me
out,
because
I
was
like
oh
we're.
This
network
actually
looks
good.
We
should.
F
We
can
create
plenty
of
dye
from
from
other
assets
that
we
add
and
20k
is
like
a
pretty
good
place
to
start
the
your
initial
f
wrapper,
because
you
want
the
real
wef,
because
you
want
to
be
able
to
test
integrations.
That's
part
of
the
reasons
we
want
to
use
gourley.
So
so
we
just
need
enough
f
to
like
create
some
vaults
that
allow
for,
like
deeper
integrations
with
other
projects
and
whatnot.
F
It
sounds
like
we
may
be
able
to
get
more
than
the
20k
that
we
already
asked
for
so
so
that'll
be
that'll,
be
good.
Maybe
we'll
get
it
once
we
have
everything
deployed
and
they're
willing
to
like
fund
it.
So
so
right
now
it
doesn't
look
like
it'll,
be
a.
A
Problem
awesome
last
call
for
any
other
questions
right
now
for
pe.
A
Thanks
for
chiming
in
frank,
I
appreciate
it
nick
is
looking
to
join
us
kind
of
at
the
tail
half
of
this
meeting,
so
we've
bumped
the
oracle's
update
to
the
end,
which
means
risk,
is
up
next
promotion.
Giving
the
update
today.
H
Yeah
yeah,
so
so
we
managed
to
finally
publish
d3m
module
risk
assessment
today,
where
we
also
proposed
parameters
such
as
step
ceiling
and
target
power
rate,
which
are
essentially
the
only
two
parameters
needed
for
this
module.
Apart
from
potential
implementation
of
dev
ceiling,
instant
access
module,
which,
which
would
also
include
another
two
parameters,
we
propose
a
bit
conservative
parameters
at
launch
so
that
ceiling
of
only
10
million,
but
we
noted
that,
after
a
period
of
testing,
we
think
we
could
increase
debt
ceiling
up
to
200
million.
H
H
The
risks
are
mostly
related
to
obvious
solvency:
liquidity,
governance,
historical
risks,
but
the
part-
that's
maybe
a
bit
bit
risky
and
worth
to
emphasize
and
with
it
is.
Is
this
situation
where
the
module
could
not
be
working
as
we
would
want
in
certain
edge
cases,
and
this
would
be
a
situation
where,
potentially,
there
is
some
kind
of
negative
event
that
other
funds
would
start
flowing
out.
H
This
would
increase
utilization
levels,
interest
rates
and
d3a
module
would
begin
to
increase
exposure
to
ava.
Instead
of
decreasing
it,
so
it
actually
goes
from
from
bad
to
worse
and
yeah.
The
the
problem
is
that
the
module
doesn't
really
know,
there's
some
kind
of
negative
negative
events
happening
cadaver,
because
the
only
input
it
uses
is
the
battery
and
the
only
partial
protection
we
could
think
of
is
to
is
to
implement
instant
access.
H
So
this
this
kind
of
limits,
the
growth
of
of
exposure
and
other
in
this
kind
of
scenarios.
So
story
short.
Please
read
the
report
I
already.
I
already
saw
some
good
comments
today.
Consider
this
these
risks
and
provide
feedback,
especially
related
to
to
the
depth
exposure
maker
wants
to
have.
H
I
personally
also
think
that,
if
you
are
to
test
this
module,
now
or
or
really
soon
would
be
a
good
time,
because
our
liquidity
planning
rewards
are
being,
I
think,
potentially
temporary,
temporarily
disabled
in
10
days,
and
this
might
this
might
increase
rate
sedaw,
and
if
we
had
a
d3
module
life
we
could
we
could
see
it
utilized
and
tested,
but
I
think
we're
still
waiting
for
some
smart
contract
audits.
So
I'm
not
sure
how
fast
we
can.
H
We
can
really
move
here
other
than
that
now
that
we
finish
most
of
this
risk
assessments
for
collaterals
and
this
module,
we
started
focusing
more
on
on
others.
That
was
in
our
backlog.
H
The
issue
we're
facing
right
now
is
that
vaults
are
currently
pretty
well
capitalized,
and
this
is
because,
after
so
really
well
collateralized
and
after
this
is
because,
after
the
crash
in
may,
world
owners
started
to
be
a
bit
more
cautious,
which
is,
of
course,
good.
But
the
respiratory
calculations
are
showing
really
low
numbers,
so
it
might
be
a
bit
misleading
now,
which
means
that
when
we
simulate
for
lower
liquidation
ratio,
these
premises
are
still
pretty
good,
but
we
may
we
may.
H
What
we
want
to
do
is
to
run
the
same
simulations
on
on
set
of
inputs
that
present
a
bit
more
risky
behavior
of
users.
So
we
probably
try
to
to
focus
on
a
period
before
may
crash
when
users
were
pretty
heavily
leveraged
so
that
we
have,
you
know
more
balanced
view.
What
happens
if
we
lower
the
liquidation
ratio
and
that's
about
it?
Also
chris
mentioned:
there's
this
ongoing
work
with
institutional
worlds
tomorrow,
with
all
the
teams.
H
Hopefully
we
finalize
the
proposal
and
yeah
you
can
you
can
expect
an
interesting
proposal
in
yeah
soon
regarding
these
new
world
offerings
that
are
not
just
for
institutions
but
may
also
be
for
for
retail
and
yeah?
That's
it
from
our.
A
Else,
cool
and
I
hadn't
missed
that
nick
had
already
joined
the
call.
So
I
am
going
to
circle
back
to
him
for
the
oracles
update.
Sorry
about
that
nick.
Take
it
away.
I
No,
my
my
fault
for
for
context.
I
I
had
a
a
conflict
for
this
call
and
had
had
let
peyton
know
so
thanks.
I
I
I
So
that's
that's
very
exciting,
really
really
proud
of
the
team
for
for
all
of
the
work
that
that
they've
put
into
this
it's
it's
really
paying
off
we're
also
on
the
kind
of
die,
fast
withdrawal
bridge
kind
of
scrutinizing
that
problem
space
right
now.
I
I
This
is
what
helps
us
circumvent
this
like
one
week,
withdrawal
kind
of
delay
that
that
you
would
typically
see
on
an
optimistic,
roll-up
type
of
situation,
so
we're
evaluating
what
what's
really
needed
there,
talking
to
some
external
teams,
doing
some
internal
research
and
and
really
just
trying
to
vet.
You
know
what
are
the
trust
assumptions
here
or
what
are
the
incentives
and,
under
what
conditions
do
do
those
do
those
hold
or
under
what
conditions?
Do
those
break?
I
You
know
and
are
those
the
same
or
riskier
than
the
trust
assumptions
we
already
make
when
it
comes
to
oracle's
generally
right,
for
example,
when
we're
talking
about
feeds
right
feeds
are
essentially
just
trust
like
a
trusted.
Validator
set
that
maker
governance
is
kind
of
elected
or
delegated
right,
and
then
in
this
circumstance
right.
I
Whoever
is
kind
of
deciding
that
or
whatever
the
consensus
mechanism
is,
where
you're
deciding
that
these
transactions
that
are
being
seen
on
optimism
on
l2,
that
that
you're
kind
of
running
from
locally
and
and
and
verifying
that
they're,
okay
right,
you
know
what
is
this
consensus
game
that
you
play
right,
that
you
that
you'd
show
that
that
everyone
agrees
that
you
know
this
is
legit
or
this
is
not
legit,
so
so
that
was
that
was
a
bit
long
long-winded.
I
But
that's
where
we're
looking
at
that
very
closely,
and
you
know
we-
we
see
a
lot
of
potential
with
with
l2.
You
know
not
just
for
for
dye
and
maker
in
general,
but
also
in
particular
for
for
oracles.
I
You
know
from
a
business
model
point
of
view
right.
If
d5,
you
know
shifts
to
l2,
you
know
they're
still
going
to
need
oracles
on
there
right
or
and
from
a
margins
point
of
view
right.
The
transactions
on
l2's
are
significantly
cheaper
right,
so
it
makes
delivering
the
oracle
service
much
much
cheaper,
which
is
a
kind
of
a
very
attractive
kind
of
business
opportunity.
I
So
you
know
l2
oracle's,
really,
you
know
not
just
for
optimism,
but
you
know,
for
arbitrarum
and
for
other
l2s
is
really
front
and
front
and
center
here
and
we're
kind
of
already
talking
to
to
teams
that
are
looking
at
launching
on
those
chains.
You
know
whether
they
would
be
open
to
to
using
maker
oracles
yeah.
As
far
as
the
we,
we
did
a
collateral
onboarding
assessment
formatic
that
we
published
at
the
tail
end
of
last
week.
I
I
think
we're
gonna
have
to
push
back
on
the
executive
vote
for
a
couple
weeks,
purely
because
we
are
kind
of
busy
with
the
with
the
migration
right
for
lit
p2p,
and
we
don't
want
to
have
like
too
many
different
oracle
versions
kind
of
flying
around.
We
want
to
kind
of
get
the
the
upgrade
out
and
then
kind
of
do
do
the
incremental
changes.
I
You
know
that
that
are
involved
for
for
token
onboarding,
for
example,
matic,
so
really
the
earliest
that
we're
looking
at
from
matic
onboarding
is,
I
think,
the
executive
for
the
week
of
august
6th,
which
is
about
three
weeks
from
now
so
that'll.
That
would
be
for
tokens
that
require
a
feed-based
oracle.
I
Now
I
think
christopher
mooney
brought
up
earlier
that
they're
that
we're
looking
at
the
the
sushi
lp
tokens.
There
is
no
kind
of
roadblock
from
from
the
oracle
side
there,
because
those
are
just
kind
of
individual,
smart
contracts
that
we
deploy.
So
there's
no
conflict
there.
We
can
we're
ready
to
go,
at
least
from
the
oracle
perspective,
we're
ready
to
go
on
those
whenever
and
yeah.
Also
I
guess
court
last
update
core
unit.
I
You
know
please
pass
the
executive
vote,
the
you
know.
Oracle
core
unit
is
trying
to
spin
out
of
the
foundation
at
the
end
of
the
month
and
it's
hard
to
do
that
when
we
don't
have
any
money.
A
Any
questions
for
nick
on
the
oracle
side.
A
J
Yeah
thanks,
so
I
will
start
by
thanking
the
strategic
happiness
car
you
need
to
send
in
honolulu
to
sending
me
the
some
cool
swag
of
makers.
Those
are
my
first
one,
so
I'm
super
happy
to
have
them,
even
if
it
was
not
easy
to
send
the
package
to
france,
you
will
see
what
france
is
for
some
of
you
next
week
under
the
updates.
J
We
have
an
updated
budget
by
mark
it's
not
public
on
the
farm
yet,
but
as
a
teaser,
I
can
say
that
if
the
community
incorporates
all
the
proposed
car
units,
we
will
you
and
don't
make
more
amusing.
Currently
we
will
lose
money
at
the
end
of
the
month,
but
still
be
cash
flow.
Positive.
The
difference
between
between
the
net
income
and
being
cash
flow
positive
is
mkr
tokens
that
are
giving
us
compensation
as
well.
J
We
have
a
first
meeting
with
shaman
sterling
on
the
new
silver
audit.
Today
there
is
a
lot
of
stuff
in
there,
so
it
will
take
a
little
bit
of
time
to
unpack
it.
But
what
is
super
interesting
is
that
it
gave
us
a
clear
view
on
a
real
battle
plan
for
unchained
securitization
and
the
funny
part
interesting
part
I
would
say,
is
that
sethi
why
the
blockchain
could
be
super
interesting
for
secretization.
J
So
there
is
really
a
play,
a
game
we
can
play
here
to
to
be
a
key
element
of
for
the
securitization
and
maybe
not
make
a
doubt,
but
most
likely
the
ecosystem
as
well.
J
So
that
might
allow
us
to
increase
the
debt
ceiling
of
those
kind
of
securities,
not
only
new
silver
and
not
only
centrifuge,
but
all
those
that
are
based
on
the
same
structure
so
secretization
above
the
debt
ceiling
as
a
drawback
is
that
it
will
take
a
lot
of
time
to
implement
everything.
J
On
the
cayman
phonation,
we
have
some
news
as
well,
so
we
have
started
to
get
some
documents
on
the
article
of
incorporation
and
memorandum.
So
one
of
the
main
questions
we
have
currently-
and
I
changed
my
view
every
day,
more
or
less
is
who
is
in
charge
of
this
makerphone.
There
is
a
cayman
foundation
in
my
first
post,
I
thought
it's.
A
good
idea
was
to
have
some
maker
representatives,
so
maker
would
be
able
to
appoint
three
people.
Five
people
like
mussi
sig.
J
Then
we
started
to
work
on
a
meep
that
we
will
be
able
to
pass
messages
to
the
border
directors,
saying
that
the
body
of
directors
has
to
do
only
what
they
are
told
by
the
maker
governance.
So
then
you
may
say
you
don't
have
to
ever
kill
people
as
directors
of
the
common
physician.
You
can
have
a
kind
of
trustees,
so
some
people
that
you
pay
and
you
are
sure
that
will
do
whatever
to
tell
them
to
do.
J
But
then
there
is
another
issue.
Is
that
those
people
and
trustees
in
general
don't
want
to
do
much
and
to
be,
and
they
want
to
be
told
almost
everything.
Every
single
step,
and
then
that
means
that
we
will
have
to
spend
a
lot
of
executives
just
to
make
them
do
something.
So
maybe
it's
not
the
ideal
as
well.
Maybe
the
best
strategy
is
to
have
a
combination
of
some
make
representatives
with
some
independent
directors
of
trustees.
J
That
will
do
the
safeguards
to
ensure
that
there
is
no
no
problem
still
to
to
work
on
that
on
that
front,
but
we
might
have
some
news
soon
and
yeah
that's
about
it
on
on
our
end,
if
you
have
some.
J
Yeah
and
that's
the
issue
I
mean,
if
you
are
having
to
tell
everything
every
week,
it's
idea
quite
complex
to
do.
A
I'm
not
seeing
any
other
questions
there.
So,
thanks
for
that
update
seth,
I
saw
your
camera
pop
on
nadia
for
the
girlfriend
update.
Take
it
away.
G
This
is
the
link
for
this
week's
updates.
You
can
go
there
and
read
it
in
detail.
I
just
realized
that
was
very
a
very
long
post
for
this
week,
but
we
had
been
having
meetings
with
a
different
project
with
brave
blueprint,
decentraland
and
kyber.
G
Wait,
wait
where
we
are
waiting
to
have
the
meeting
with
the
xerox
team
to
understand
why
they
are
not
using
the
vaults
or,
if
probably
maybe
they
were,
but
we
wanted
to
have
feedback
from
them
and
start
from
from
with
that
feedback
as
an
input
for
the
next
steps
about
how
we
are
going
to
offer
these
collaterals,
and
if
we
want
to
abort
these
collaterals.
I
know
the
sentiment.
G
The
community
sentiment
showed
us
that
we
should,
because
those
are
not
profitable,
but
I
think
that
through
this
feedback
we
can
consider
other
other
things
besides
profit,
for
example,
if
it's
a
good
pr
for
us
or
not,
or
if
it's
a
good
partnership
for
us
or
not
or
if
maybe
a
makerbots
could
be
some
sort
of
treasury
management
solution
for
these
projects.
So
I
think
those
are
are
things
to
consider
and
most
of
them
they
are
not.
G
Most
of
them
know
they
are
not
using
the
makerbots
as
now
because
of
different
reasons,
because,
for
example,
in
the
case
of
brave
they
were
using
the
bat
token
to
incentivize
their
community
in
in
other
cases,
they
don't
have
someone
who
has
like
a
strategy
to
manage
the
treasury,
so
they
are
not
creating
strategies
to
do
that.
It
is.
It
is
also,
although
it
is
super
interesting
to
know-
and
I
think
that
we-
we
all
have
to
know
this-
that
they
really
want
to
keep
their
token
as
a
collateral
loan
maker.
G
So
what
we
are
asking
them
is
to
take
the
remaining
debt
avail
available
in
the
in
the
vault,
and
we
will
consider
that
as
a
good
sign
that
they
really
want
to
be
a
as
a
collateral
loan
maker.
Because
of
this
is
not
an
easy
decision
for
them,
because
they
they
have
to
have
like
internal
meetings
to
evaluate
the
risk
parameters
and
take
the
decision
about
opening
the
boat.
G
We
are
giving
them
until
september,
the
first
to
see
if
they
did
it
or
not,
and
after
that
we
will
evaluate
next
steps.
I
think
next
update
is
regarding
institutional
bolts.
G
Well,
we
are
working-
and
I
think
this
is
this-
is
pretty
cool
not
just
because
it
will
represent
a
large
supply
and
an
increased
die
supply
on
on
our
side,
but
also
it's
it's
like
how
a
work
we
are
doing
between
different
core
units,
and
we
are
also
using
nexus
feedback
to
create
this
new
product,
which
is
which
I
think
is
is
super
great,
and
we
are
also
in
conversations
with
others
that
are
interested
about
using
something
like
an
institutional
from
maker
because
they
want
to
have
access
to
a
tie
loan.
G
But
of
course
we
are
having
some
problems
and
we
are
trying
to
figure
it
out
the
way
to
solve
these
problems
regarding
kyc
and
regarding
the
of
change
requirements
that
these
big
institutions
may
have
and
actually
nexo
they.
They
also
have
these
these
needs,
but
because
they
are
nexo,
they
are
already
using
makerbots.
G
They
are
more
flexible,
but
if
we
really
want
to
create
a
product
focused
on
institutions,
we
have
to
think
about
having
a
one-to-one
relationship
to
set
agreements,
for
example,
or
how
we
could
like
give
them
a
larger
liquidation
window,
because
these
large
institutions
they
are
used
to
do
they
are.
They
are
used
to
that.
To
do
that,
so
we
are
talking
with
our
legal
counsel
to
understand
all
the
qic
kyc
requirements.
G
We
are
also
trying
to
like
talk
with
different
companies,
because
maybe
we
don't
have
to
we
don't
have
to
find
a
solution
for
this.
We
could
like
just
make
an
agreement
with
a
partner
who
could
provide
these
services
to
these
institutions
so
yeah
other
updates,
psm
delay,
update
mariano
wrote
in
in
the
post,
the
updates
we
got
from
paxos,
and
this
is
very
interesting
because
what
we
are
talking
with
them-
and
actually
they
are
working
in
a
in
a
blog
post.
G
G
So
what
does
that
mean
is
that
we
will
have
something
similar
as
circle
has
with
usdc,
so
we
will
be
able
to
provide
on-off
ramps
from
usd
from
fiat
to
die
using
the
psm
in
the
middle,
but
but
that
will
be
transparent
for
the
user
who
have?
Who
has
access
to
this?
That's
that's!
That's
amazing
and
well.
We
are
working
with
access
team
to
er
to
make
that
a
reality.
G
We
also
wrote
to
post
one
is
about
future
products
and
what
else
we
can
we
can
like
create
from
the
pro
from
the
protocol,
and
it
doesn't
have
to
be
like
a
product
that
that
we
create,
but
it
also
could
be
a
partnership
that
we
could
like
look
for
it.
G
So
I
wrote
a
post
explaining
all
the
details
about
why
we
should
think
about
a
solution
not
just
for
fortune
but
in
general
for
other
networks,
so
they're,
because
well
now
we
are
seeing
all
these
a
multi
multi-chain
ecosystem.
So
we
should
like
have
a
plan
for
this.
So
join
the
forum,
the
conversation
and
and
we
are
reading
your
feedback
start
of
the
week
this
week
was
announced
the
integration
between
oasis
and
the
push
notifications
module.
G
This
is
great
because
I
think
it
was
something
that
our
fault
users
really
need,
and
it's
like
they
will
be
able
through
oasis,
to
get
notifications
that
let
them
know
different
things
about
about
about
their
fault.
So
this
is.
This
is
super
cool
tweet
of
the
week
through
our
handle.
We
talk
about
the
psm
and
usdc
and
all
these
discussion
that
was
on
crypto
twitter
for
the
last
days,
and
we
also
we
will
be
in
paris,
so
gustav
is
talking
about
real
world
asses.
G
I
will
be
talking
also
about
a
how
was
the
process
of
passing
from
the
foundation
and
now
to
be
part
of
the
community
as
a
korean
need
and
with
a
ses
product
engineering
team
and
of
alpha.
We
organized
this
side
event
keeping
up
with
the
maker
mafia.
So
I,
if
you
are,
if
you
are
going
to
be
in
paris,
I
expect
you
to
see.
I
expect
to
see
you
all
there
and
that's
it.
A
E
Yeah
got
it,
so
you
were
talking
about
having
meetings
with
brave,
loopering,
decentraland
and
xerox,
just
about
like
what
to
do
with
their
current
vaults
and
whether
like
they
per
they
on
their
side,
support
the
the
community's
decision
to
try
to
off-board
them.
Is
that
kind
of
what
you're
talking
about.
A
All
right,
I'm
freaking
out
less
during
the
sciences,
but
I
think
I
gave
that
plenty
of
time
I'll
kick
it
over
to
juan
and
scs
for
their
update.
K
Thank
you
pros,
hi
everyone.
My
name
is
juan
from
scs
and
updates,
quick
updates
from
from
us
for
for
this
week.
K
Sorry,
if
my
internet's
a
bit
choppy,
I'm
actually
visiting
chris
and
starling,
is
not
working
very
well
but
yeah
on
the
permanent
team
side,
we're
working
to
publish
okrs
so
hopefully
we'll
have
them
ready
by
next
week
or
the
next.
But
it's
it's
looking
quite
quite
nice,
I'm
I'm
very
happy
with
with
the
results
there.
K
As
nadia
mentioned,
we
are
going
to
be
at
ecc
next
week.
Link
is
going
to
be
there
collecting
data
and
interviewing
experts
for
project
x-ray.
K
Last
week
we
had
nikolai
and
vauder
present
risk
and
opportunities
for
the
dao.
The
video
is
already
in
the
public
folder,
so
check
it
out.
It's
very
interesting
and
we'll
we'll
keep
pushing
on
that
framework
as
well.
Regarding
tomorrow's
call,
andy
is
going
to
be
well.
He
actually
already
did
a
couple
of
successful
workshops
to
define
roles
and
responsibilities
within
a
core
unit,
so
tomorrow
is
going
to
be
talking
more
about
that
in
our
ses
updates
at
2,
30
utc.
K
So
everyone's
welcome
to
to
join
and
and
learn
or
or
give
feedback
on
that
as
well.
On
other
news,
we
have
the
thai
foundation
maps
in
rfc,
so
please
give
feedback.
We
already
received
a
lot
of
feedback,
so
we're
very
happy
with
it.
Hopefully
we
can.
We
can
make
it
even
better
before
it
goes
to
to
the
formal
submission
so
yeah
forum.com.
K
Regarding
the
incubis.
We
actually
have
two
announcements,
I'm
quite
happy
about
that
as
well.
One
of
them
is
the
core
unit
focus
on
auctions
and
liquidations
uis
and
services,
so
stay
tuned
for
more
so
yeah.
Hopefully
we
get
to
scale
the
the
dow
more
and
make
it
safer
with
that
and
the
other
core
unit
that
we
are
going
to
be
on
boarding
is
a
back
bounty.
It's
a
coin.
K
That's
going
to
manage
a
back
monthly
program
and
security
related
activities,
so
we
are
quite
happy
with
them
and
with
the
course
of
the
of
incubation
program
and
yeah,
nikola
is
going
to
actually
be
giving
an
update
on
that
next
next
week,
so
next
friday.
K
So
if
you
want
to
know
more
about
that,
please
tune
in
regarding
the
community.
Vauda
and
myself
were
in
in
a
podcast.
I
think
it
was
a
week
ago
and
it's
live
now
with
with
dao
house.
It's
called
house
party,
it's
somewhere
in
twitter
and
on
the
east
cc
side
events
we
have
I'm
going
to
be
presenting
a
cs
maker
in
w
source,
decentralized
breakfast.
K
The
two
calls
that
are
coming
one
is
to
be
defined,
so
we
will
to
confirm
it
yet,
but
it's
with
entangled
for
real
world
assets,
collateral
boarding
and
the
other
one
is
the
know,
your
map
on
august
11th,
with
the
protocol
declaration
of
intent-
that's
pretty
much
it
from
us
again.
Our
office
hours
are
tuesdays
at
1,
30
utc.
So
if
you
have
any
questions
come
join
us,
and
this
is
where
you
can
all
find
us.
A
Questions
yeah
one.
I
was
just
curious
about
the
the
auction
uis
and
is:
is
the
scope
of
that
different
from
what
the
ducks
team
covers,
or
is
this
an
additional
team
that
will
create
some
different
applications
or
front
ends
for
the?
I
guess,
liquidation
systems.
K
It
it
is
going
to
be
specialized
in
not
only
uis
but
more
like
more
like
services.
Also
you
guys
too,
but
it's
going
to
be
fully
specialized
in
in
this.
It's
it's
not
ducks.
K
F
I
had
a
question
about
the
the
team
that
we're
bootstrapping
for
handling
bug
bounty
stuff.
Do
we
know
who
those
members
are
or
can?
Maybe
we
can
have
a
discussion
with
pe
in
that
team.
D
A
Right
anything
else
for
juan
and
scs.
A
Awesome
doesn't
look
like
it
david
see.
You
popped
on
video
and
ready
to
go
with
our
mips
update.
E
Yeah
sure,
let
me
just
share
my
screen
really
quickly.
If
I
could
find
the
share
screen
button.
E
Sorry
give
me
just
a
sec
all
right
here.
We
are
okay,
cool
yeah,
hey
everybody!
Welcome
to
the
weekly
mips
update.
I
am
david,
giving
you
the
state
of
the
vote
this
week,
so
so
yeah
welcome
to
the
month
of
july,
or
rather
I
guess
we're
halfway
through
it.
So
hello
from
the
month
of
july.
Last
week
we
had
our
formal
submission
period
as
usual.
E
You
know
week
one
everybody
submits
as
they
should,
and
then
we
have
our
submission
review
on
the
thursday
call
which
me
and
payton
did
last
week,
and
so
since
then
monday
the
12th
has
rolled
around
and
ratification
polls
have
started,
and
so
we
are
about
a
third
of
the
way
through
these
votes
and
and
yeah,
and
today
we're
going
to
cover
just
what
the
submissions
are
and
what
the
current
results
are.
E
So
yeah.
Let's
talk
about
the
state
of
the
boat,
so
yeah
we
have
a
number
of
different
core
units,
so
we
have
collateral
engineering
services,
which
is
a
core
unit.
That's
focused
solely
on
the
collateral
onboarding
aspect
of
the
maker
protocol.
They
propose,
like
an
engineering
team
and
processed
like
pretty
much
everything
with
monkey
irish
for
the
facilitator.
E
Their
annual
budget
is
3.1
million
dollars
approximately
and
they're,
proposing
a
team
size
of
around
six
permanent
people
with
two
temporary
roles
and
two
advisors,
and
so
for
that
core
unit.
We
currently
have
a
no
vote
winning
but
of
course,
yeah,
there's
still
plenty
of
time.
So
I
encourage
any
mkr
voters
that
are
leaning
against
this
core
unit
to
voice.
E
Why
and
to
give
the
facilitator
or
other
members
of
this
team
a
chance
to
really
kind
of
address
any
concerns
that
they
might
not
have
been
able
to
address
during
the
rfc
period
and
so
yeah.
Currently
collateral
engineering
services
is
running
at
a
no
and
then
yeah,
and
so
then
there's
the
amazics
marketing
core
unit
and
they
are
yet
another
marketing
services
core
unit,
that's
being
proposed
with
mitchell
amazics
for
the
facilitator.
E
They
have
a
1.1
million
dollar
proposed
annual
budget,
with
a
team
size
of
about
five
people,
and
and
for
that
we
are
getting
an
overwhelming
no
from
mkr
voters
with
only
43
mkr
for
yes
and
about
12
000.
For
now,
then
we
have
strategic
marcoms,
which
is
actually
submitting
the
second
version
of
their
proposals.
E
You
know
they
had
a
failed
result
in
a
prior
month's
governance
cycle
and
since
then,
they've
taken
the
community's
feedback
and
implemented
a
lot
of
it,
and
so
that's
kathleen
chu
for
the
facilitator,
with
a
four
million
dollar
proposed
annual
budget
with
a
team
size
of
eight
people
and
three
planned
hires,
and
so
currently
the
vote
is
looking
pretty
split
with
no
in
the
lead
we
have
about
four
thousand
for
yes
and
around
eight
thousand
for
no
and-
and
I
know
that
there
was
also
a
forum
post-
that
paper
had
put
up
explaining
why
he
personally
is
voting.
E
No
and
some
discussion
has
started
there,
and
I
know
kathleen
is
in
that
thread
too
happy
to
answer
questions.
So
if
you
do
have
anything
against
these
proposals,
yeah
definitely
engage
these.
This
is
a
critical
week
or
two
for
these
proposals
and
if
they
don't
go
through,
they
got
to
go
another
month
or
cancel
or
whatever,
but
either
way.
Let's
talk
about.
It
is
the
point.
E
Next
we
have
governance
communications,
which
is
a
core
unit
that
offers
resources
and
services
that
focus
on
information,
accessibility
and
communications
as
a
public
organization
and
that's
actually
being
proposed
with
myself
as
the
facilitator,
we
have
a
proposed
annual
budget
of
about
half
a
million
dollars
a
year
with
a
team
size
of
two
permanent
roles,
one
to
hire
and
around
seven
to
eight
part-time
contributors,
and
so
so
far
we
have
a
positive
result
on
our
vote.
We
have
four
thousand
for
yes
and
about
four
for
no,
so
that's
looking
good
yeah
sure
sure.
J
So
it's
interrupt
just
to
say
on
the
record
that
it's
not
paper
who.
E
I'm
just
going
from
memory
yeah,
oh
my
bad,
but
either
way
yeah
cool
thanks
for
thanks
for
that
all
right
and
then
to
continue
on
to
the
other
four
submissions
so
that
that's
it
for
the
core
units.
E
As
for
the
other
submissions,
we
have
55
the
special
purpose
fund
and
that
is
currently
a
resounding
yes.
If
the
vote
ended
today,
it
would
be
ratified
because
it
passed
that
10
000
positive
participation,
mark
mip
52
dispute
resolution.
Likewise
is
past
that
10
000
mkr
mark.
So
unless
somebody
comes
in
with
a
whole
lot
of
no's,
it's
looking
like
this
is
on
track
to
get
past,
and
then
the
remaining
two
subproposals
in
the
monthly
cycle
are
sp19
and
sp.
E
21
for
budget
modifications,
they're
modifying
the
growth
team's
budget
and
the
the
content
production
team's
budgets
slightly
up,
one
is
to
accommodate
some
new
deals
into
new
positions
for
the
growth
team
and
another
is
to
accommodate
a
new
hire
and
additional
continuity
funds
for
the
content,
production
team,
and
so
both
of
those
are
also
a
resounding
yes,
with
12
000
for
growth
and
yeah.
Just
about
the
same
a
little
bit
more
for
content
production,
so
yeah,
so
that
that's
about
it.
So
definitely
we
see
sorry.
E
Let
me
just
kind
of
talk
for
a
second,
so
there's
a
number
of
you
know.
I
guess
a
bit
of
turmoil
in
the
core
unit
vote
so
definitely
am
excited
to
see
how
the
community
works
through
it
over
this
next
week
and
a
half
so
yeah.
That's
it
for
the
state
of
the
vote
and
I'll
just
quickly
cover
a
few
new
mips
in
rfc.
Before
I
hand
it
off
to
pros
again
so
we
saw,
as
mentioned
earlier
in
the
call
the
dye
foundation
core
unit
being
kicked
up.
E
This
is
really
really
cool,
soren
peter
nielsen
for
the
facilitator,
with
a
proposed
annual
budget
of
two
mil
two
million
dollars
for
the
first
year,
a
million
dollars
for
the
second
year
and
then
zero
by
year,
three
and
onwards.
So
it's
a
really
actually
unique
kind
of
budget
proposal
for
what
it
is
and
then
yeah.
K
K
K
E
E
Thanks
oh
cool
yeah,
and
then,
besides
the
dye
foundation
core
unit,
we
have
the
maker
portfolio
core
unit,
which
proposes
to
build
a
portfolio
of
publicly
traded,
real
world
financial
assets
that
the
maker
protocol
can
be
exposed
to,
and
so
chris
cameron,
aka
paper
imperium
is
proposing
himself
this
and
this
core
unit
for
its
facilitator,
and
the
proposed
annual
budget
is
around
339k
a
year.
E
E
This
is
a
second
attempt
by
different
members
of
the
working
group
to
put
up
some
guidelines
and
there's
a
great
number
of
of
comments
and
conversation
happening
in
that
thread
so
definitely
contribute
and
then
finally,
we
have
mip
57,
which
is
greg's
proposed
real
world
asset
committee.
This
formalizes
the
creation
of
a
real
world
asset
committee
at
maker,
dow,
it's
scope
and
a
process
by
which
m
care
holders
can
modify
the
membership
of
such
groups.
E
There's
also
tons
of
feedback
already
given
for
this
mip,
which
I
love
to
see,
and
basically
this
committee
would
just
make
recommendations
on
structural
requirements,
geopolitical
implement,
implementations,
sorry
implications
and
business
strategy
of
real
world
assets,
so
yeah
all
interesting,
fantastic
things
so
read
up
on
them,
comment
on
them
and
and
yeah.
So
that's
about
it.
Any
questions
feel
free
to
ask.
E
Also
don't
forget
about
the
mips
portal,
if
you're
interested
in
mips
at
all
go
to
mips.maker.com,
there's
everything
there,
including
proposals
in
rfc,
including
obsolete
proposals
that
you
know
are
no
longer
active,
like
everything
so
go
check
those
out,
and
I
know
that
the
dspot
team
actually
has
been
doing
a
lot
of
work
this
month
to
create
a
lot
of
fixes
and
make
things
a
lot
awesomer
for
the
for
the
reader
and
the
user
of
that
site.
So
yeah,
that's
it
for
me.
Thank
you
all.
B
Cool
I'll
just
try.
Another
quick
reminder
so
just
remember
that
the
ratification
polls
need
to
hit
ten
thousand
okay
on
yes,
so
there
are
a
couple
of
like
cus.
I
think
that
were
winning,
but
I
hadn't
reached
the
10k
mark.
So
just
just
as
a
reminder,
they
do
need
to
reach
10k.
Otherwise
they
count
as
failing
so
bear
that
in
mind,
and
I
guess,
encourage
everyone.
You
noticed.
A
So
thanks
for
the
reminder
there
along,
I
didn't
see
any
questions
in
the
sidebar
worth
pausing
and
asking
one
more
time,
because
we
are
at
the
end
of
our
stated
agenda.
D
A
Well,
in
that
case,
I
definitely
open
the
floor
to
topics
that
people
might
wish
to
further
explore
in
the
governance
and
risk
for
them.
Usually
we
in
these
meetings
about
25
minutes
from
now,
so
that
does
give
us
some
decent
time
to
dive
into
something.
If
there's
something
weighing
on
anyone's
mind,.
B
So
one
thing
I
just
I
just
briefly
spoke
to
some
members
of
p
about
why
we
were
mile
meeting
was
going
on
was
potentially
including
the
cu
budgets
in
the
next
executive
as
well
in
the
case
that
the
current
one
doesn't
pass.
B
Sorry,
andrew
no,
I.
B
Okay,
cool
yeah
anyways,
so
the
idea
here
will
be
to
include
the
budgets
in
the
next
exec
with
a
modifier
that
makes
sure
that
if
the
previous
exec
passes,
then
the
budgets
don't
get
sent
again,
which
covers
most
cases.
It
doesn't
cover
the
case
of
the
new
executive
passing
and
then
the
previous
executive
passing,
but
that
seems
pretty
unlikely.
B
B
Yeah,
I
think
it'd
be.
I
like,
I
think,
it'll
be
vanishingly
likely
to
happen
and
also
it's
pretty
low
impact.
So
yeah.
A
There
are
some
contingency
budgets
factored
in
with
this,
though,
so,
maybe
not
the
smoothest
in
terms
of
just
renting
another
month.
D
E
Yeah
sure
so
for
the
govcoms
core
unit,
we
currently
have
somewhat
of
a
positive
vote.
Obviously
anything
can
happen,
but
in
the
meantime,
we
in
preparation
of
a
positive
outcome,
we're
looking
for
an
engagement
lead.
So
we
have
two
full-time
people
with
a
third
that
we're
hiring.
This
engagement.
E
Lead
role
would
involve
a
lot
of
really
cool
things,
including
like
a
quarterly
engagement
project
with
any
stakeholder
group
and,
like
there's,
there's
a
lot
so
I'm
gonna
post
the
link
about
the
role
in
the
chat
and,
if
you're
interested,
definitely
reach
out
to
me.
So
if
you're
interested
in
hosting
calls
engaging
with
stakeholders
really
leading
like
engagement
internally
here
reach
out.
E
Oh
yeah
yeah
also,
if
anybody
is
interested
in
learning
more
about
what
we're
going
to
be
doing
at
govcoms,
hopefully
feel
free
to
join
the
ama
tomorrow,
I'm
going
to
be
on
there
answering
literally
any
questions
you
all
have
so.
E
D
A
D
H
D
Like
as
much
as
anyone
might
want
to
get
invested
and
people
deserve
to
be
vested
pretty
modest
in
what
you
request
and
I
think
ultimately,
governance
should
be
deciding
how
much
maker
any
individual
or
core
unit
or
person
should
be
getting
rather
than
maybe
putting
in
a
request.
I
think
it's
a
little
more
modest
to
leave.
It
open-ended
be
like
how
much
do
you
think
we
deserve
and
obviously
there's
some
core
units
that
are
just
like
you
know.
D
Critical
the
whole
thing
won't
exist
without
them,
but
you
know
not
that
every
every
person
is
valuable
here
but
like
there's,
some
some
talent
is
like
just
really
scarce
to
find.
So
you
know,
don't
don't
be
too
aggressive
with
how
much
you're
asking
for,
I
think,
just
leave
it
up
to
the
community
and
leave
it
open,
just
some
random
thoughts.
That's
not
anybody.
C
F
E
E
So
at
the
moment,
all
of
the
budgets
are
under
mip
40
component
three.
So
if
you
go
into
the
mips
repo
or
the
mips
portal,
you
could
check
all
of
them
out
under
that
folder
at
the
moment.
There's
two
core
units
that
have
proposed
their
budgets
and
mkr
vesting
in
one
proposal
and
that's,
I
think,
pe
and
oracles
outside
of
that
we
have.
E
We
have
like
in
the
guidelines
and
the
proposed
guidelines,
this
one
piece
called
separation
of
concerns
and
that
asks
for
core
units
to
actually
put
their
but
their
budgets
separate
from
their
mkr
vesting
packages
and
so
far
scs
has
followed
that
guideline,
even
though
it's
not
formally
ratified-
and
you
know
speaking
as
a
mip
editor,
I
suggest
people
do
that
separation
of
concerns
where
they
separate
out
their
actual
budget
that
might
be
modified
quarter
to
quarter
or
you
know,
from
the
actual
mkr
investing
package
so
yeah.
E
K
Yeah
yeah,
exactly
because
I
I
even
as
long
this
on
the
on
the
forum,
I
don't
think
he
had
time
to
answer
yet,
but
I
like
there
was
mips
38.
I
believe
that
was
supposed
to
keep
track
of
this
core
unit,
but
it
was
modified
to
not
do
it
because
the
mips
portal
is
supposed
to
have
filters
where
you
can
say
give
me
all
the
sub
proposals
for
me,
39
that
are
approved
or
that
have,
I
don't
know,
been
obsolete
or
whatever.
K
So
you
can
use
these
filters
to
actually
access
this
information
in
a
quite
easy
way,
but
I'm
not
sure
where
we
are
with
the
mips
port.
So
if
those
filters
have
been
implemented
yet
if
they
they
are
in
a
in
a
quick
link
to
to
review.
So
that
might
be
the
easiest
way
to
do
it,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
it's
available
yet.
A
B
So
yeah
it's
it's
both
in
map
38
city
of
c2.
They
might
not
be
really
up
to
date
at
the
moment
and
we
don't
have
separate
tags
for,
like
mkr
budgets
versus
regular
budgets.
There's
just
like
an
active
budgets
tax
filters,
so
you
can
look
at
all
active
budgets.
We
can
probably
look
into
putting
a
tag
that
separates
our
mkr
budgets
from
like
dive
budgets
makes.
B
A
Awesome
thanks
for
those
inquiries
there
I
find
myself
tempted
to
cut
the
meeting
a
little
short
today
as
soon
as
there's
doesn't
seem
to
be
much
discussion.
So
if
you
were
planning
on
getting
one
last
thing
in
this
would
be
your
last
chance
to
do
so.
D
Anyone
that
I
might
have
missed,
which
is
probably
most
people,
hit
me
up
on
rocket
chat,
and
I
will
try
to
send
you
guys
some
some
stocks
there's
still
a
couple
hundred
left.
So
you
know
especially
julian.
I
think
I
hit
you
up.
You
didn't
respond
a
bunch
of
other
guys,
but
yeah.
E
Has
there
been
any
update
from
the
from
the
swag
shop
core
unit.
D
I
think,
because
of
the
they're
still
part
of
the
foundation
until
that's
dissolved,
their
hands
might
be
a
little
bit
tied
yeah.
But
I
I
don't
really
know
too
many
details.
I
love
cool
to
talk
to
them,
but
have
conversations
you
know.
I
can't
talk
about
them.
E
B
Yeah
so
like
the
the
swag
stuff,
like
the
urban
stock
stuff,
might
be
a
good
use
of
the
special
purpose
budget
map
it
passes.
B
I
like
personally,
like
one
of
my
concerns,
is
that
it's
maybe
not
a
core
unit
and
then
like
doesn't
really
have
any
responsibilities,
but
it's
still
something
that
we
probably
want
the
doubt
to
pay
for
urban
paper.
D
Responsibility
is,
I
think,
some
people
pretty
happy
or
something
get
the
word
out.
I
mean
it's
hard
to
like
quantify
like
what
is
the
value
of
what
I'm
doing.
That's,
why
I'm
not
like
specifically
asking
for
anything,
but
you
know.
D
To
like
log
my
expenses
to
see
what
the
hell
I'm
actually
spending
on
stuff-
and
it's
sometimes
more
sometimes
less-
you
know
I
was
doing
it
for
years
and
bought
the
original
die
socks.
But
then,
while
I
was
in
calm,
dev
amy
was
comping.
You
know
my
expenses
for.
D
I
don't
know,
it
makes
me
happy
to
see
other
people
happy
and
I
think
when
we
have
high
quality
stuff
people
like
to
wear
it
share,
show
it
off
to
like
their
friends,
and
you
know
I
wear
I
put
in
wearing
his
stock
shirt,
but
I
wear
it
like
five
days
a
week.
B
D
Oh
yeah,
that
was
without
that
one
was
pumped.
That
was
one
of
the
okay
okay
yeah.
That
was
one
of
the
last
last
invoices
for
combat.
That
was
so
that
one
was
kind
of
everything
following
that,
but
that
was
to
the
african
blockchain
institute.
I
got
like
four
crates
of
stuff.
It
was
literally
like
200
pounds
of
swag
trip
to
africa,
so
I
understand
why
it
was
so
much
money,
but
yeah
going
forward.
I've
just
been
sort
of
paying
out
of
pocket,
but
it's
okay.
D
A
That
was
nice.
A
few
extra
discussion
topics
yeah
keep
it
rolling.
If
you
got
everything
else
on
your
mind,
I
feel
like
these
calls
are
a
great
opportunity.
We
have
so
many
people
from
so
many
different
parts
of
the
ecosystem
and
general
interest
within
maker.
So
yeah
shoot
your
shot.
If
you
got
anything.