►
From YouTube: Governance and Risk | Ep. 157
Description
Introduction
@LongForWisdom : Hosting, Introduction, Agenda.
Weekly Updates
Poll + Executive Status - @LongForWisdom
Forum at a Glance - @gov-comms-core-unit
Core Unit Updates
Governance - @GovAlpha-Core-Unit
Protocol Engineering - @Protocol-Engineering
Oracles - @Oracles-Core-Unit
Risk - @Risk-Core-Unit
Growth - @Growth-Core-Unit
Content Production - @Content-Production
Governance Communications - @gov-comms-core-unit
Sustainable Ecosystem Scaling - @SES-Core-Unit
Real World Finance - @Real-World-Finance
MIPs
MIPs Update- @MIP-Editors
Snippets/written updates:
https://forum.makerdao.com/t/agenda-discussion-scientific-governance-and-risk-157-thursday-september-2-17-00-utc/10105
A
Hello,
everyone
and
welcome
to
the
make
it
out
scientific
governance
risk
meeting
number
157
taking
place
on
thursday
september,
2nd
1700
utc.
My
name
is
long
for
wisdom,
I'm
one
of
the
government's
facilitators
at
maker
dao.
I'm
sharing
this
meeting
with
you
all
today,
so
yeah
as
usual,
we've
got
a
bit
of
an
agenda
to
get
through.
We've
got
some
weekly
updates
from
our
core
units.
A
I've
got
a
mips
update
as
well.
I
don't
think
we
have
any
specific
segments
or
discussion
topics
lined
up
so
be
a
bit
of
a
free-for-all
once
we've
done
with
our
updates.
So
if
there's
anything
anybody
wants
to
discuss,
I
guess
stop
thinking
about
it
now,
just
to
briefly
over
the
sort
of
explanations
for
this
meeting
for
those
that
are
new
yeah.
A
Cool
all
right
so
I'll,
maybe
start
us
off
with
a
brief
summary
of
polls
and
executives
over
the
last
week,
just
kind
of
confirming
the
governance
outcomes,
so
the
executive
from
I
think
two
weeks
ago,
now
passed
a
little
while
ago,
but
that
brought
us
an
increase
to
success
capital's
debt
ceiling.
It's
it's
decreased.
The
liquidation
ratios
slightly
on
a
number
of
vaults.
A
So
for
the
polls
that
finished
this
week,
we
finished
three
green
light
polls,
so
we
greenlit
two
of
them,
so
we
greenlit
nebula
capital,
partners
and
carus.
I
think
global
fintech
funds
drop
and
capital
now
cannabis
drop
was
deferred
and
then
for
the
positive
started.
This
monday
we
had
lower
the
fasted
flashman
module
three
to
zero
percent,
which
passed
and
add
solar
x
as
a
new
road
asset,
vault
type,
which
also
passed
so
should
have
an
executive
tomorrow.
A
I
believe
the
current
plans
are
for
that
to
include
the
flashman
module
fee
change.
As
mentioned,
it's
probably
going
to
set
up
dss
vest
to
do
some
of
the
core
units
dive
budgets,
most
of
the
core
units,
low
budgets.
I
believe,
and
also
set
up
some
of
these
cus
mkr
budgets,
at
least
those
that
have
had
them
approved
already.
B
B
Next
up
is
a
popular
one
by
derek
from
protocol
engineering
core
unit
who
published
a
very
elegant
consensus
by
the
entire
team.
He
explains
how
governance
related
decisions
now
bind
the
protocol.
Engineering
core
unit
continues
to
scale
with
its
members
growing
and
beginning
to
wear
different
hats.
It's
essential
to
abide
by
the
core
mandate.
In
response,
the
team
has
been
strategizing
the
future
of
the
protocol
engineering
core
unit
and
present
to
the
community
some
thoughts
about
their
evolution.
B
B
This
is
a
sad
one
to
present,
but
brie
announces
the
unfortunate
but
necessary
discontinuation
of
the
maker
rocket
chat
channel
after
october
31st
2021,
the
maker
dial
community
is
now
tasked
to
explore
and
decide
on
a
new
communication
platform.
This
post
also
continues
as
a
discussion
so
check
it
out.
B
B
B
B
And
in
response
to
thames
informal
poll
on
delegate
compensation,
spider-man
presents
his
concern
of
the
current
voting
power
by
delegates.
He
asks
the
community
whether
paying
recognized
delegates
to
govern
the
protocol
puts
maker
doubt
at
an
increased
risk
of
being
deemed
a
security
by
united
states
authorities.
B
We
also
have
frank
cruz
who's,
who
asks
the
community
whether
real
world
asset
originators
should
state
mkr
to
be
sent
to
the
flapper,
along
with
a
few
other
accompanying
questions.
This
suggests
this
suggestion
stems
from
multiple
recent
discussions
on
the
forum,
as
well
as
ideas
brought
up
by
an
up-and-coming
real-world
asset
lender
gold
finch.
B
We
have
one
ongoing
discussion
that
is
still
strong
in
the
comments
where
chris
cameron
proposes
real
world
finance
core
unit
to
be
split
in
two
one,
focusing
on
the
business
aspects
of
things
and
the
other
one
focusing
on
risk
answer
signal
requests.
There
are
three
signal:
requests
that
are
still
active.
B
And
finally,
also
following
community
support
and
discussion
wanted
supply
signals
to
off
board
can
see
a
vault
type
with
the
parameter
changes
outlined
within
the
post
for
more
information
on
the
forum.
At
a
glance,
please
check
out
the
post,
which
includes
a
three-point
summary,
also
includes
ongoing
initiatives
and
help
wanted.
B
A
D
D
For
first
time
we
tested
out
having
like
a
split
weekly
team
meeting,
basically
two
different
times
at
opposite
ends
of
the
day
in
order
to
accommodate
our
team,
who
does
come
from
from
all
all
over
the
globe
and
at
least
for
the
first
week
that's
been
successful.
So
we're
going
to
keep
doing
that
and
happy
to
update
people
on
how
that's
going.
We
also
added
a
new
member
to
to
do
some
contributions
for
us
he's
the
existence.
D
We
had
a
lot
of
reviews
from
from
long
for
wisdom
and
a
bunch
of
contributions
from
gala
astronaut,
this
and
maker
breaker,
so
I
wanted
to
call
those
out
and
not
to
blow
up
his
spot,
but
I
did
want
to
highlight
that
long
is
also
looking
for
ways
that
the
court
units
can
under
better
understand
project
priority
from
the
voters
and
the
community
at
large,
so
be
on
the
lookout
or
share
some
thoughts.
If
you
have.
E
D
F
Hey
yeah
long,
I
actually
was
thinking
about
something
with
regards
to
gas
prices
going
through
the
roof
this
week
because
of
jpeg
minting.
Do
you
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
have
delegate?
This
is
a
delicate
question.
Do
you
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
have
delegates
kind
of
have
a
minimum
that
they've
retained
in
their
voting
contract
aviv
right?
Should
you
know,
should
we
have
a
certain
limit
like
a
floor
speaking
of
jpegs?
F
A
F
Yeah
so
imagine
like
there's
like
another,
and
this
doesn't
always
happen
right:
black
swan
events,
possibly
they
don't
occur
every
year,
but
imagine
we
have
another
one
and
we
need
to
do
an
emergency
vote.
Do
you
think
delegates
should
retain
at
least
one
if
or
ten
eve
in
case
they
got
to
pay
2500
in
gas
fee
in
gui.
A
That's
clear,
yeah!
No,
I
think
I
understand
what
you're
saying
so
you're
saying
you
hold
it
in
case
the
gas
prices
are
super
high,
but
we
need
to
pass
something
really
important
really
quickly
totally.
Maybe
I
can
honestly
say
it's
not
something
I
thought
I've
thought
about
to
this
point.
You
know.
Perhaps
the
deadline
should
consider
doing
that,
but
I
don't
think
I
think
that
would
be
hard
to
like
mandate.
I
guess
especially
when
it's
like
the
price
of
each
increase.
This
number
comes,
you
know
pretty
punitive
like
to
take.
A
F
G
Hey
guys
yep,
I'm
here
derek
from
protocol
engineering
all
right,
what
better
way
to
kick
it
off
than
we
had
arbitrarium
launch
this
week,
so
they've
got
arbitrary
ones,
layer
two
launched.
So
what
are
we
doing?
On
our
end?
We're
doing
some
final
audit
checks
and
we
should
have
the
diet
gateway
launched
within
a
couple
of
weeks.
The
reason
why
we're
taking
a
little
bit
longer
is
because
it's
a
custom
gateway
so
that
in
the
long
run,
let's
just
have
a
fundable
diet.
G
G
That
juan
ran,
we
also
had
bartek
jump
in
and
give
a
good
discussion
on
some
of
the
potential
relations
with
the
protocol
engineering
team,
and
what
does
that?
What
does
that
look
like?
How
do
we
look
to
to
evolve
and
move
into
the
future
with
them?
So
I
think
that
was
a
really
good
discussion
for
anyone.
That's
interested.
We
also
had
some
of
the
delegates
and
join
us
for
that
conversation
and
have
some
good
questions
there
as
well.
G
I
think
that
wraps
up
layer,
two
we've,
I
think,
we've
already
covered
the
last
week's
exactly
of
this
week's
executive
and
we
covered
the
forum
posts
item.
Thank
you.
You
did
a
great
job
touching
base
on
all
of
that.
So
I
will
move
on.
I
think
other
work
that
we've
been
doing
this
week.
We
added
maddox
support
to
the
auction
keeper
that
was
in
the
previous
executive.
We've
also
been
continuing
on
the
early
development
work.
G
So
we're
great
happy
to
have
them
join
us
in
in
doing
that
work,
and
then
the
final
one,
I
think
in
terms
of
audits,
is
that
we've
got
a
b
protocol
doing
an
audit
of
dss
charter,
which
will
be
the
work
to
support
institutional
bolts.
So
that's
a
another
good
one
to
be
wrapping
up
and
speaking
of
audits,
I
guess
I
can
also
touch
on
we
wrapped
up
a
number
of
formal
verification
tasks
so
using
satora,
l2
dye.
So
writing
specifications.
G
You
have
the
permit
function
which
we
can
talk
more
about
if
people
are
interested,
but
I
won't
get
into
the
details.
Also.
We
wrapped
up
dss
best,
so
formal
verification,
fuzzing.
It's
basically
using
automated
software
testing
techniques
and
that's
kept
us
pretty
busy
for
all
up
this
week.
If
there's
anyone
else
in
the
team
that
wants
to
jump
on,
if
I
missed
anything,
feel
free
to
do
so
or
if
there
are
any
questions,
let
us
know.
F
Yeah,
derek,
I
guess
I
could
throw
a
question
at
you
with
regards
to
your
post
of
evolution
of
the
protocol
engineering
team
and
now
you're,
bringing
up
audits
right.
It's
no
secret
that
there's
been
a
few
hacks
that
were
audited
by
the
top
auditing
firms
and
they
did
formal
verification
and
some
of
them
even
did
informal
verification
by
the
top.
You
know
ethereum
community
members
out
there-
and
I
was
just
wondering
with
regards
to
the
evolution
of
pe.
Have
you
guys
ever
thought
about
doing
a
white
hack
team?
F
G
Yeah
yeah
totally
we
we
have
I'll
I'll,
let
probably
let
brian
and
chris
talk
to
this
one.
We
we
definitely
have
and
we've
thought
about
not
only
internal
teams,
but
maybe
other
protocol
teams
like
what
we're
doing
with
b
protocol
there
are.
You
know
there
are
ways
to
split
the
team
and
have
people
look
at
each
other's
code
and
it's
a
great
way
of
sharing
a
way
of
sharing
knowledge
that
one
group
has
worked
on
versus
another.
But
I
know
chris
and
brian.
You
guys
have
spoken
about
this.
H
But
we
I
we
don't
have
I
mean
aside
from
like
auditors,
which
I
mean
it
is
kind
of
their
job
to
think
adversarially
and
and
go
at
it.
We
do
have,
like
you
know,
internal
code
reviews
that
are
adversarial,
but
we
haven't
actually
split
out
a
team.
Yet
that
tries
to
like
to
you
know,
hack
stuff
internally.
H
With
regards
to
sort
of
white
hat
hacking,
I
mean
a
lot
of
times:
that's
used
in
the
context
of
like
actually
like
running
an
exploit,
but
for
for,
like
good
reasons,
you
know
not
malicious
ones,
you
know
maybe
save
funds
or
whatever
and
we
you
know
we
have
the
dark
spell
and
some
other
mechanisms
that
we
could
lean
on.
If
we
had
to
do
that.
H
F
Yeah
it
is,
I
bring
it.
Oh
sorry,
real
quick.
I
brought
it
up
because
sushi
sushi
had
to
react
when
they
did
that
ido
platform,
like
I
think
it's
miso
and
one
of
the
things
they
were
thinking
of
doing
was
removing
the
token.
So
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
guys
do
kind
of
fire
drills
in
case
there
is
a
so
yeah
sorry
about
that.
D
We're
not
cartoon
characters
on
twitter,
like
this
looks
really
bad
on
us.
If
something
goes
wrong
in
the
system
and,
frankly,
we
we
know
it
better
than
the
auditors
that
we'll
be
sending
it
to
so
in
a
lot
of
cases
like
the
audits
do
catch
things
for,
for
you
know,
minor
things,
but
the
the
actual
the
work
itself.
D
We
just
can't
trust
an
auditor
to
to
find
all
of
our
bugs
and
that's
like
we
take
that
seriously
and
take
that
upon
ourselves
to
just
manage
that
process,
because
the
last
thing
I
want
is
a
is
a
call
from
samsung
in
the
middle
of
the
night.
You
know
to
to
go
into
a
war
room,
but
we
do.
We
do
rely
on
multiple
audits
and
that's
somewhat
to
assure
us.
D
I
And
I
can
add
some
more
here
so
within
ses.
There
are
also
a
couple
of
initiatives
to
improve
security
in
the
in
the
short
term
and
in
the
longer
term.
So
one
thing
is
that
very
practically
we're
working
with
in
inunify,
which
is
a
decentralized
bug
bounty
program.
So
they
are
part
of
our
incubation
program
and
forming
a
core
unit
that
would
run
a
makerbot
bounty
program
as
well
as
help
with
the
operational
audits
of
security
aspects
around
operations.
I
So
that
is
the
second
one
and
then
the
last
one
is
that
we're
also
talking
to
auditors
in
order
to
maybe
share
audit
resources
between
core
units
and
make
sure
that
we
have
a
retainer
contract
so
that
we
don't.
You
know
we're
not
dependent
on
competition
with
other
protocols
and
so
on
when
it
comes
to
to
having
the
necessary
audit
resources
available.
A
J
J
So
I
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
alignment
at
first,
at
least
between
this
kind
of
die,
fast
withdrawal
bridge
on
on
optimism,
because,
essentially
that's
the
oracle
for
that
is.
Is
this
bridge
right?
It's
essentially
asserting
that
some
transaction
happened
on
layer,
2
and
using
the
oracles
as
kind
of
a
consensus
mechanism
to
assert
that,
and
then
you
know
just
a
testing
to
that
on
chain
on
on
layer
one.
J
So
we
think
that
kind
of
developing
this,
for
initially
just
for
optimism,
will
be
kind
of
a
good
learning
opportunity
for
us
to
kind
of
learn
the
ropes
of
this
kind
of
new
domain
that
we're
probably
a
bit
unfamiliar
with
with
all
the
the
surrounding
context,
and
then
we
can
apply
once
we've
gotten
the
the
optimism
piece
out
for
the
the
faster
thrall
bridge.
We
can
then
try
to
generalize
this
to
inc
kind
of
include
many
different
types
of
messages.
Not
just
here.
J
Let
me
burn
die
on
this
chain
and
generate
it
on
that
chain,
but
to
do
kind
of
all
sorts
of
different
stuff
right.
So
you
could
imagine
doing
a
governance
vote
on
l2
right
and
then
everyone
gets
cheap
governance
fees
right
on
l2,
and
then
you
kind
of
assert
the
result
on
on
layer.
One
right,
you
could
have
kind
of
cross
chain
communication
between
dapps
right.
So
maybe
you
have
this,
like.
J
J
You
know,
please
mint
me
some
dye
against
that
right
and
you
assert
that
on
layer,
one
and
layer
one
can
then
give
you
the
the
die
on
on
layer,
two
right,
and
so
this
way
you
could
have
someone
borrow
on
layer
two
right
for
significantly
cheaper
gas
fees
yet
and
to
them.
It
seems
like
there
is
a
maker
protocol
running
on
optimism,
but
really
it's
just
kind
of
this
this
week.
J
J
That's
that
should
be
quite
a
bit
simpler
because
right,
you
should
be
able
to
port
these
kind
of
bridging
contracts,
fairly
trivially
famous
last
words
to
the
different
evm
kind
of
compatible
chains.
I
think
where
it
gets
a
little
more
complex
is
for
the
chains
that
don't
support
the
evm
things
like
solana
right
where
you'd
have
to
rewrite
this
whole
thing
in
rust,
but
but
it
is
doable,
and
so
the
cool
thing
is
right.
J
You
wouldn't
have
to
say:
oh
well,
I'm
making
a
bridge
for
ethereum
two,
you
know
optimism
or
four
aetherium
two.
You
know
arbitrary
four
optimism
to
arbitrarium
right,
it's
just
as
long
as
it
conforms
to
the
the
standard.
It
should
be
able
to
talk
to
any
of
the
other
chains
that
already
conform
to
the
standard.
So
there's
like
a
really
cool
kind
of
scalar
kind
of
multiplier
effect.
J
Once
you
get
a
couple
kind
of
chains
on
there,
but
I
but
like
I
said
this
is
like
very
early
days,
we're
still
kind
of
researching
like
how
how
all
of
this
would
work,
but
it
seems
quite
promising
and
in
terms
of
like
breaking
down
the
work
and
planning
like
we
said
we
we
really
just.
We
don't
want
to
get
too
far
ahead
of
ourselves,
and
so
we
really
just
want
to
prototype
like
just
for
this
optimism.
J
Eat
kind
of
diet,
fast
withdrawal
bridge
first
and
get
that
out
rather
quickly,
because
we
don't
want
to
hold
up,
you
know
pe
and
we
don't
want
to
hold
up.
You
know
the
protocol
expanding
to
to
optimism,
and
after
that
you
know,
we
can
review,
see
what
we've
learned
see
what's
working
see,
what's
not
working
see
which
design
decisions
were
bad
and
try
to
design
this.
This
bigger
more
more
generalized
system.
J
So
I
I
guess,
on
the
the
non-technical
side,
just
kind
of
some
back
end
oracle,
core
unit
stuff,
going
on
right
now,
we've
hired
a
design
firm
to
generate
kind
of
logos
for
us
and
typography
and
color
palette
and
and
kind
of
presentation,
templates
and
and
all
that
good
stuff,
because
we
do
want
to
kind
of
have
our
our
own
kind
of
brand.
That's
that's
independent
from
maker,
under
which
we
can
kind
of
sell,
sell
these
kind
of
infrastructure
kind
of
services.
J
So
we
should
have
our
entity
being
finished,
set
up
in
the
next
10
business
days
and
we're
making
progress
on
getting
a
banking
partner
for
that
entity.
Setup
as
well,
but
that's
a
little
bit
slower
going
and
it
might
take
a
couple
months
before
before
those
things
are
finalized
and
that's
it
from
from
iron.
A
F
F
Like
oracle
as
a
service
right
so
like
you're,
seeing
pif,
which
I,
which
I
asked
you
about
before
monetizing
it
through
jane
street,
I
think
or
jump
trading
one
of
those
two
and
I
was
wondering
if
eventually
there's
something
that
you
know
maker
can
do
with
layer
twos
being
able
to
scale.
You
know
to.
Hopefully
you
know,
hundreds
of
thousands
of
transactions
per
second.
J
J
K
Other
unprofitable
collateral
types
will
follow
next,
where
we
will
propose
similar
steps
and
parameter
adjustments
to
off-board
them,
then
we
are
still
working
on
nexo
institutional
world
risk
assessment
and,
in
the
meantime,
waiting
for
the
poll
to
confirm
or
adjust
loan
terms.
The
risk
assessment
is
proceeding.
Well,
we
are
still
adding
a
few
sections.
K
Then
we
are
also
started
to
look
into
lido's
staked
it.
It
pull
on
curve
which
might
be
our
next
collateral
evaluation
and
then,
lastly,
we
are
doing
a
bunch
of
work
on
the
risk
dashboard,
which
was
recently
redesigned
with
a
new
ui
and
a
few
additional
features
which
are
already
implemented,
for
example,
gas
monitor,
which
shows
the
life
estimation
of
gas
cost
for
various
actions,
a
world
user.
Sorry,
a
world
user
might
do,
and
then
we
are
also
working
on
several
different
features
which
will
be
added
in
the
future.
K
E
So,
hey
everyone
I
wasn't
prepared,
I
thought
it
was.
It
was
set
before
me,
but
hey
everyone,
so
I
just
pasted
the
link
of
the
updates
for
this
week,
so
we
posted
a
signal
request
for
the
nexo
institutional
vault,
and
this
is
a
reminder
for
everyone
who
hasn't
vote
to
vote.
Our
suggestion
to
the
community
is
that
we
should
launch
institutional
bulks,
because
it's
a
product
that
we
can
go
outside
reach
out
to
other
companies.
E
We
know
others
other
are
interested
in
something
like
this,
because
this
is
a
more
capital,
efficient
solution
for
them,
and
this
will
bring
maker
a
minimum
of
200
million
die
from
crypto
collaterals
so
and
for
crypto
collaterals,
like
ether
and
bitcoin.
So
we
think
this
is
a
very
good
opportunity
to
growth
for
the
maker
protocol.
E
E
E
Regarding
the
collateral
of
boarding,
we
posted
in
the
signal
requests
that
should
be
created
like
what
we
talked
with
these
projects.
Our
suggestion
is
that
we
should
not
off
board
the
blueprint
token
the
path
token
and
the
mana
token,
because
these
projects
are
interested
in
using
the
maker
protocol
and
actually
blueprint
and
mana.
They
already
open
a
position
in
in
the
maker
protocol
and
we
are
talking
with
them
to
think
about
strategies
to
so
their
community
can
start
using
even
more
these
faults.
E
So
you
can
just
like
go
there
and
read
what
what
are
these
projects
commitment
with
the
maker
community?
And
I
also
wanted
to
talk
about
this
strategy.
We
are
creating
in
in
maker
growth
that
it
comes
from
the
times
of
the
maker
foundation
when,
when
we
started
the
gaming
strategy
and
how
to
have
more
time
in
the
in
the
crypto
games,
so
we
are
doing
the
same,
but
we
are
thinking
like
how
to
involve
die,
not
just
in
gaming
but
also
er
in
the
entities
and
the
metaverse
solutions
that
are
appearing.
E
So
we
are
working
closely
with
various
artists
that
are
creating
nfcs
to
incorporate
dye
in
their
work.
We
are
also
supporting
and
sponsoring
different
tournaments,
especially
the
axi
tournaments,
because
those
are
huge
in
latin
america
and
it's
in
southeast
asia.
So
this
will
also
give
us
access
to
these
people
there
who
are
gaming,
who
are
using
axi
to
earn
this
this
this
prices,
and
we
are
also
continuing
the
strategy
with
the
metaverses.
So
now
is
something
a
partnership
we
are
doing
with.
E
E
So
we
think
nfts
are
super
important
and
that
we
have
to
like
do
things
with
these
projects
that
are
doing
stuff
around
gaming
and
if
these
medivers,
so
we
we
have
like
a
a
lot
of
er
efforts
on
those
on
the
on
that
vertical
and
the
start
of
the
week.
Well,
centralized
exchange
in
hong
kong
listed
die
against
usdt
and
they
will
open
other
markets
in
the
in
the
coming
weeks,
and
also
gala
games
added
die
to
as
a
purchase
currency
in
their
website
and
the
tweet
of
the
week.
E
E
Yes,
they
they
will
be
start
using
it
in
the
in
the
following
days.
I
I
spoke
with
them,
but
I
don't
know
why
they
haven't
done
it
yet,
but
they
I
mean
they
wrote
in
the
forum
that
they
will
open
the
bolt
and
they
will
do
it.
But
it's
just
like
is
is
not
a
high
priority
for
them
right
now,
so
it
will
take
some
days.
A
L
C
L
On
and
get
a
good
plan
for
the
next
budget,
so
yeah
switching
to
a
six-month
proposal.
This
time
around,
there
will
be
a
couple
of
a
couple
of
new
things
in
there,
based
on
the
discussions
that
we've
had
with
the
community
about
getting
a
marketing
program
going
we're
proposing
to
bring
on
someone
to
help
with
press
relations
and
a
marketing
strategist,
to
help
figure
out
a
direction
to
go
with
all
that.
L
F
L
L
I
L
L
We
also
posted
an
update
on
the
brand
research
that
we've
been
conducting.
The
research
basically
summarizes
the
first
17
interviews
that
we've
done
we're
planning
on
this
being
an
ongoing
thing.
You
know
how
people
the
way
that
people
think
about
maker
dao
is
obviously
going
to
change
over
time.
So
we
see
this
as
an
ongoing
ongoing
project,
but
the
initial
results
have
been
pretty
interesting.
L
L
L
Yeah
other
than
that
still
continue
making
really
good
progress
on
explainer
videos.
We've
done
content
audits
of
makerdale.com
at
the
community
portal
and
are
working
on
implementing
what
we
can
on
the
community
portal
side
for
now,
and
we've
also
got
an
asset
allocation
in
the
works
so
that
we
can
start
coordinating
asset
allocation
with
the
dye
foundation.
L
M
L
D
L
A
C
C
We
got
our
die
and
we're
continuing
setup
point
two
yeah.
The
summary
team
now
has
coverage
of
every
public
call,
except
for
cu
tools
and
see
rituals,
so
a
really
huge
shout
out
to
artem
and
to
the
10
or
11
different
contributors
that
make
you
know
the
semi-transcribed
editorial
snippets,
like
all
the
different
written
summaries
that
we
do
huge
shout
outs
to
all
of
you
and
and
yeah.
Thank
you,
but
yeah.
We
we
have.
C
Yeah
third
point:
we're
still
hunting
for
an
engagement
lead.
I've
done,
I
think,
four
interviews.
Now
I
have
a
second
interview
with
one
candidate
but
in
general
I'm
still
definitely
interested
in
new
applicants,
so
send
people
my
way
if
you
think
that
they
are
good
for
the
role
and
if
you're
curious
about
the
role,
it
is
essentially
like
a
stakeholder
relations,
job
mixed
with
a
side
of
research,
so
you're
going
to
be
engaging
with
people
at
the
dow
at
various
levels.
You
know
in
various
positions
and
you're
also
going
to
be.
C
You
know
kind
of
mapping
and
tracking
the
dow,
so
it's
a
really
interesting
role.
So
I
can't
wait
to
find
a
great
person
to
fill
that
and
then
just
some
general
updates
from
my
team.
We
started
an
internal
people
list,
for
you
know
the
dow
internal
it's
not
just
used
by
govcoms.
It's
meant
to
be
used
by
all
of
the
ratified
core
units,
and
so
we
have
a
public
version
of
this
resource
planned
for
the
future.
But
for
now
we're
just
starting
with
an
internal
people
list
we
also
cleaned
up.
C
So
actually
this
week
I
spent
some
time
in
that
document
and
and
we
formulated
a
plan
for
for
what
this
document
should
be,
and
the
plan
is
to
make
it
into
an
all-encompassing
emergency
playbook
that
contains
information
on
emergency
types,
maker,
dao's,
threat,
monitoring
practices
and
the
various
coordination
tracks
and
associated
processes.
So
not
just
communications
but
also,
like
you
know,
the
technical
coordination
track
and
the
and
the
governance
coordination
track
and,
depending
on
the
emergency,
there's
different
coordination
tracks,
which
yeah,
it's
all
part
of.
C
Next
we
have
so
I
mentioned
this
a
couple
weeks
ago,
but
we
began
a
team
update
audit
and
basically
the
idea
was
to
check
out
all
of
the
core
unit
communications
and
to
try
to
understand.
You
know
like
what
people
are
doing
in
common.
What
people
are
not
doing
in
common
and
to
kind
of
just
get
a
a
more
all-encompassing
view
of
what's
happening
right
now,
so
that's
expanded
into
a
general
like
information
output
audit.
C
So
we're
not
just
looking
at
teams
we're
also
looking
at
delegates
we're
also
looking
at,
like
you
know,
like
ppg,
for
example
like
working
group
members,
so
we're
trying
to
segment.
Everybody
understand
how
they
communicate
and
we're
going
to
make
this
really
cool
visual.
As
a
result
of
this
big
audit.
C
So
that's
pretty
cool
too.
The
monthly
governance
review
as
well
has
a
project
overview
document
in
our
public
drive,
and
you
can
look
out
for
the
august
edition.
It
should
be
posted
actually
by
tomorrow
and
yeah.
That's
about
it.
Our
office
hours
are
the
usual
set
to
fridays,
from
1800
to
1830.
Utc
feel
free
to
jump
in
and
ask
us
questions.
Collaborate
with
us
find
out
what
we
do.
We
have
an
open
door
so
yeah,
that's
it
for
me.
Today.
M
Juan
from
sustainable,
consistent
scaling-
and
let
me
share-
hopefully
the
right
window
this
time-
let
me
know
if
you
can
see
it
yep
great.
So
last
week
we
focused
a
lot
on
the
incubation
program,
so
this
week
we
want
to
focus
more
on
the
research
projects
that
we're
doing
so.
Here's
a
list
of
things
we're
working
on
to
decentralize
work,
workforce
and
the
well
the
capital.
M
So
one
of
them
is
project
dog
food.
We've
spoken
about
this
in
the
in
the
past
and
basically
it's
about
documenting
our
own
experience
and
making
sure
that
we
open
or
we
lower
the
barriers
of
entry
for
anyone
to
join
the
community.
So
this
includes
templates
and
different
tools
that
we
might
create
along
the
way.
M
Then
there's
a
project
x-ray,
so
bank
and
jordan
did
a
pretty
good
presentation
a
couple
weeks
ago.
I
think
it
was
two
weeks
ago.
The
video
is
on
our
on
our
public
folder.
If
you
want
to
check
it
out
and
this
one's
about
attracting
talent,
then
we
have
the
project
legal
framework
where
we're
exploring
different
things
that
have
to
do
with
the
legal
setups
and
interactions
with
the
with
the
real
world
or
the
traditional
world,
and
then
there's
project,
guardrail
and
sandbox.
M
This
we
haven't
spoken
about
much
yet
yeah,
we'll
speak
about
them
in
the
future,
and
we
also
have
more
announcements
coming
soon
then
yeah.
What
I
wanted
you
to
focus
on
is
the
project
x-ray.
As
I
said,
the
videos
on
our
folder,
if
you
want
to
check
it
out-
and
we
are
asking
you
for
help
for
qualitative
research,
so
jordan
and
link
are
compiling
answers
to
to
discover
different
things.
So,
if
you
can
fill
this
form,
I
just
posted
it
on
the
on
the
chat
as
well.
M
That
would
help
them
a
lot.
Otherwise
we
will
spam
you
all
of
you.
So
beware:
regarding
the
project
legal
framework,
we
will
have
layer
zero
tomorrow
presenting
at
2
30
utc.
I
think
it's
it's
looking
great.
I've
checked
everything
that
they
have
done
so
yeah
come
come
join
us
it's!
It's
quite
interesting.
There's
a
lot
of
content
to
check
out.
I
don't
know
later
here.
If
you
want
to
add
something
or.
M
M
Next
friday
we
will
have
makoto
from
ethereum
naming
service
come
to
explain
how
it
works
and
how
the
core
units
could
use
it
so
come
come
join
us.
I
think
it's
going
to
be
great.
I
don't
know
I'm
a
big
fan
of
of
the
product
and
the
following
week.
We
will
have
the
dax
core
unit
presenting
their
their
mip,
so
looking
forward
for
that
one
as
well,
I
think
powder
is
gonna
call
as
well.
If
you
want
to
add
something
better
or
if
there
are
any
questions
from
anyone
really.
M
I
Jumping
yeah
yeah
I
I
just
would
like
to
clearly
thank
all
of
you
who
supported
our
efforts
and
those
of
you
who
voted
for
us
we're
very,
very
happy
about
the
being
connected
to
the
family,
so
to
speak,
and-
and
we
are
yeah,
certainly
getting
into
setup
mode.
Long
has
given
us
a
lot
of
good
stuff
and
and
we're
getting
organized
now
so
yeah
thanks
again.
G
A
N
N
So
that's
why
the
this
world
finance
was
at
the
end
of
the
call,
because
I
had
a
parallel
call
with
some
service
provider
in
the
comments
just
earlier
discussing
what
is
the
difference
between
an
individual
director
or
corporate
one,
how
to
make
them
watch
vote.mikeblog.com
and
who
they
need
to
listen
to,
obviously,
no
one,
but
still
a
little
bit
to
watch.
Vod.Maker.Com
thing
like
that.
N
So
there
is
a
lot
of
kyc
going
on,
because
I
guess
more
than
10
parties,
some
all
want
to
do
kyc
on
almost
everyone,
and
some
don't
want
to
do
anything
until
they
have
performed
kyc
and
to
perform
kyc
on
something
it
should
exist
first.
So
that's
why
it's
making
it
taking
a
lot
of
time
to
find
a
good
path
to
do
all
those
scales,
oh
just
kyc,
and
we
are
also
working
on
the
deal
documentation.
N
And
the
last
point
is:
we
are
continuing
to
growing
the
team.
So
since
we
have
onboarded
some
real-world
assets,
we
are
now
in
a
position
that
people
might
want
to
join
us
because
we
are
serious
in
the
space.
We
are
one
of
the
few
protocols
that
is
really
making
kilowatt
set
on
defy,
so
we
should
have
a
new
recruit
joining
us
next
week
and
and
we,
but
we
will
keep
the
coordinates
small
and
that's
message
I
should
pass.
N
We
have
meetings
every
week.
Well,
if
you
want
to
scale
that
will
be
super
difficult.
But
at
the
same
time
I
understand
that
governance
like
the
selex
project,
because
that's
very
good
for
pr.
So
there
are
some
trailers
to
to
be
set,
and
maybe
we
should
have
more
core
units
to
do
the
assessment,
the
monitoring
or
the
operational
side
of
them,
and
that
will
also
pose
a
problem
of
decentralization
and
speaking
of
this
introduction.
N
N
A
A
O
O
Quick,
so
hello,
everyone
welcome
to
a
new
midweekish
mix
update.
We
are
currently
passing
through
our
gabriel
with
no
planned
events
for
the
governance
cycle
for
september.
Sorry,
the
government
cycle
for
september
begins
on
monday
the
6th,
and
thank
you
very
much.
I
wish
I
could
say
that
I
have
already
prepared
quite
a
lot
of
stuff
here,
so
it's
a
god
week,
but
we'll
be
doing
a
very
quick
review
of
the
proposals
in
nfc,
a
quick
overview
of
important
upcoming
dates
and
events,
and
nothing
else.
So
don't
worry.
O
The
following
proposals
are
in
rfc
and
should
be
able
to
enter
october's,
not
september's
governance
cycle,
so
we
have
to
make
59.
I
will
do
it
very
quick,
so
we
finally
have
the
missing
complementary,
so
proposals
for
the
addition
of
the
maker
labs
core
units.
So
we
have
a
budget.
We
have
a
facilitator,
so
please
go
and
leave
your
feedback
on
this.
O
If
you
haven't
already
moving
on
the
following
proposals
are
in
rfc
and
are
able
to
make
it
into
this
cycle,
so
I
will
only
do
a
quick
pass
through
all
of
these,
but
they're
already
old
acquaintances.
By
now,
a
quick
incidental
reminder
that
these
proposals
must
remain
frozen
now,
so
we
have
the
real
world
assets
foundation.
The
real
world
has
its
community
and
the
alternative
compensation
guidelines.
O
E
O
E
O
But
you're
forcing
me
to
do
it
and
mopping
on
upcoming
dates,
and
so
yesterday
was
the
last
day
for
modifications
again,
proposals
in
rfc
that
can
make
it
into
this.
One
cycle
should
remain
frozen
now,
and
the
formal
submission
window
for
september
opens
on
monday
the
6th
and
closes
end
of
day
wednesday,
88
and
ratification
polls
for
the
formally
submitted
proposals
will
go,
live
on
monday,
the
13th
and
that's
pretty
much
it
for
me.
I
tried
to
do
it
quick.
A
A
I
C
Yeah
yeah,
I
could
take
it
briefly,
so
we
did
start
up
a
document
to
brainstorm
ideas
on
how
to
optimize
this
call
and
potentially
to
break
it
up
into
you
know.
Additional
smaller
calls
like,
for
example,
like
the
discussion.
Sections
really
have
been
like
the
last
half
hour,
and
sometimes
they
you
know
they're
usually
unstructured
like
it
might
be
good
to
just
keep
it
as
team
updates
right,
but
of
course,
like
we're
still
early
in
the
process
of
doing
all
this
brainstorming.
So
I
totally
invite
you
to
share
any
ideas.
A
Yeah,
so
just
to
sort
of
expand
like
one
of
the
ideas
that
I
was
sort
of
playing
around
with
was
sort
of
having
you
know,
having
sort
of
comes
or
go
out
for
sort
of
like
curate,
the
updates
a
little
bit
more
right.
So
potentially
one
way
we
could
go
is
to
sort
of
have,
you
know
say
like
a
maximum
of
three
or
five
updates
a
week
like
you
know,
we
sort
of
rotate
through
the
core
units.
A
You
know
kind
of
prioritizing
coins
that
have
sort
of
you
know
exciting
news
or
exciting
things
to
to
share
kind
of
that
week
right.
I
think
it's
always
like
everyone's
still
present
at
the
meeting
to
answer
questions,
and
as
long
as
you
know,
we
sort
of
rotate
through
the
core
units.
Like
you
know
at
least
once
a
month,
that's
potentially
fine,
so
that's
sort
of
one
idea
I
was
sort
of
playing
around
with
as
well.
I
think.
A
Yes,
I
think
chris
suggested
in
the
sidebar
like
set
time
limit
two
three
minutes
and
hold
questions
to
the
end
yeah.
We
could
do
something
like
sort
of
having
more
strict
like
time
boxing
yep,
I
kind
of
don't
love,
love
that
I
sort
of
would
rather
have
it'll
be
like
have
room
for
it
to
be
a
little
bit
more
freewheeling,
because
I
feel
like
that's
more,
I
feel
like
the
community
gets
more
out
of
that.
I
think,
rather
than
just
having
us
rush
through
updates
super
quickly,
but
yeah.
C
That's
not
contentious,
that's
kind
of
just
like
routine.
That
could
be
left
in
the
written
update
that
you
post
on
your
forums.
It
could
be,
you
know
it.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
here
like
this
is
where
we
come
to
really
engage
with
and
like
de-silo
all
of
this
stuff.
That's
the
way
that
I've
been
thinking
and
looking
at
it.
I
Thanks
for
expanding
on
that
one
other
one,
other
consideration,
maybe
is
the
is
the
audience
of
the
call,
because
that
has
always
been
a
little
bit
ambiguous
to
me
is:
is
this
a
call
by
core
units?
Four
core
units?
Is
this?
A
call
for
delegates
and
mdr
holders
to
be
informed
is,
is
the
audience
different
to
clarify?
The
purpose.
Might
might
also
help
to
keep
the
content
more
more
personal.
A
I
mean
I'm
not
sure.
I
think
the
idea
is
to
communicate
with
make
holders,
and
I
guess
delegates
now
as
well
right,
like
you
know,
the
co-units
specifically
just
have
a
call
weekly
as
well.
We
get
to
communicate
with
each
other,
so
I
feel
like
they
should
sort
of
lean
more
towards
you
know,
sort
of
presenting
interesting
things.
L
A
D
A
J
A
A
C
Yeah
I
like
the
idea
of
like
doing
more
presentation.
You
know
like
focus
presentation
stuff
like
I
would
love
to
get
something
on
like
the
brand
research
that
was
done.
You
know
you
guys
interviewed
like
17
people
and
like
there's,
you
know
some
thought
going
on
there,
but
yeah
yeah,
just
varying
levels
of
presentation
would
be
great
on
this
call.