►
Description
Recording of PnP Core, PowerShell and Provisioning Special Interest Group community meeting help on 11th of January 2017.
A
Welcome
everybody:
this
is
the
special
interest
group
call
for
PMP
side
score
and
powershell,
and
this
is
the
first
goal
in
2017
so
happy
new
year
still
going
to
everybody,
even
though
it's
ten
days
so
ready
to
the
new
year,
and
we
do
not
have
a
significant
amount
of
new
stuff
today.
But
what
we
wanted
to
do
quickly
is
to
show
you
some
numbers
from
the
December.
A
It
has
to
actually
show
you
some
ideas
on
the
usage
and
where
we
are,
and
also
to
kind
of
show
you
that
that
people
are
actually
using
our
stuff
and
then
we
will
have
a
discussion
around
the
future
refactoring
of
some
of
our
core
components
or
sorry
on
the
provisioning
engine
and
powell
of
pls
is
going
to
do
a
quick
demo
on
that
one.
If
we
can
get
paulo
on
the
call,
Apollo
is
already
present
presenter.
It's
good!
Somebody
was
faster
than
me,
excellent,
so
a
few
things.
A
A
We
do
not
concentrate
your
birth
on
a
farm
solution
site.
We
concentrate
on
a
shipment
framework
shipment
data
model
and
Microsoft
graph
and
office
365
development
in
on
premises,
adding
model
absolutely
suitable
approach
already
today,
sharepoint
framework
will
land
on
SharePoint
2016
during
this
calendar
year
and
we
do
not
have
a
specific
timeline
for
that
one.
Yet
we
first
wanna
release
that
one
in
sharepoint
online
and
then
it's
going
to
be
landing.
A
The
knee
on
premises
so
anyway,
today
is
around
the
BMP,
see
some
core
for
on-premises
in
sharepoint
online
and
the
PowerShell
and,
like
you
know
these,
these
fellows
work
across
the
different
versions.
They
are
slightly
different
versions
actually
in
a
sharepoint
online
and
in
on-premises.
Do
the
fact
that
the
client-side
object
model
is
slightly
different
in
the
on-premises
or
within
the
online.
A
So
the
server
side,
let's
say
service,
which
is
responding-
the
disease,
amor
czech
model
course
it's
a
slightly
different
between
the
versions
and
that's
the
reason
why
there
we
have
a
different
version
of
the
core
component
and
the
engine,
foreign
premises
versions
and
sharepoint
online
anyway.
Today,
some
december
statistics,
I
just
want
to
share
you
where
we
are
from
a
usage
perspective
and
how
people
are
using
our
stuff,
the
core
component,
the
powershell
and
the
engine
and
all
of
them,
and
then
we're
going
to
talk
about
well.
A
A
So
this
is
mainly
for
the
schema
handler
as
not
handler
schema
for
matters
so
that
we
are
aligning
or
making
the
future
maintenance
on
the
engine
more
flexible
and
paulo
is
going
to
sew
that
on
in
practice
during
the
call
as
well
good,
so
moving
along
BNP's,
as
it
has
see
some
core.
So
some
statistics,
that's
what
I
wanted
to
quickly
show-
and
I
do
know
that
this
have
relatively
small,
but
I
wasn't
able
to
get
them
in
a
in
a
nice
format
from
the
power
bi.
A
Unfortunately,
so
this
is
the
sharepoint
online
nuget
packages
downloads
by
month,
november
december
and
january
or
bursa
January's
is
less
than
in
the
in
the
previous
month,
because
we're
only
11
days
during
january.
Actually,
the
statistics
are
from
nine
days,
so
they're
not
two
days
old
results,
but
we
can
actually
see
from
this
one
from
a
sharepoint
online
that
the
native
microsoft,
sharepoint
online
system
and
look
at
packets
downloads
are
crowing
quite
fast.
So
there
was
10,000
downloads
for
that
one
already
in
december
and
then
the
BMP
nougat
for
sharepoint
online.
A
We
had
true
that's
slightly
less
3,000
and
downloads
in
december
for
that
one,
which
is
slightly
down
during
december
for
a
BMP
nuget
package
download
so
for
our
new
solutions.
But
that's
absolutely
fine
and
that's
as
expected,
because
that's
quite
typical
and
the
reason
for
that
one
is
that
the
december
it
does
quite
a
lot
of
holiday
holidays
in
the
december.
A
So
in
general
we
see
abuse
well,
twenty
percent
drop
twenty
thirty
percent
trouble
under
on
the
views
and
downloads
and
everything
else
during
the
holiday
seasons
and
the
reason
probably
for
a
massive
increase
or
additional
increase
for
native
season
download
and
do
not
get
packages
that
we
got
an
additional
boost
and
additional
visibility
on
the
latest
new
get
packets,
do
multiple
social
media
channels.
So
that's
probably
the
reason
why
it's
actually
more
than
10,000
downloads.
For
the
for
the
december
for
the
on-premises
for
sharepoint,
2010,
sorry,
sharepoint
2013.
A
Windows,
simple,
where
the
assemblies
are
no
longer
boot
in
the
gac
they
are
actually
referenced
from
the
bin
folder
of
the
solution,
and
that's
one
of
the
reason
why
we
actually
release
the
on-premise
there's
no
get
packets
for
sharepoint,
2013
and
2016.
Was
it
in
October
or
November.
But,
as
we
can
see
from
here,
the
downloads
for
that
one
are
relatively
small.
The
downloads
for
sharepoint
2013,
PMP
nougat
packets
are
pretty
high.
Comparing
the
native
season
and
SharePoint
2016.
There
are
pretty
small
numbers.
A
This
could
mean
multiple
different
things,
but
most
likely
that
actually
means
that,
not
that
many
people
are
yet
doing
customizations
and
development.
On
top
of
the
shipment
2016,
which
is
pretty
much
aligned
on
the
on
the
overall
statistics
as
well,
so
a
lot
of
more
people,
a
lot
of
more
people
are
in
on
premises
in
SharePoint
2013,
rather
than
in
SharePoint.
2016,
do
miscellaneous
reasons
and
we're
only
what
slightly
above
six
months
from
a
general
availability
of
the
of
the
ship
on
2016,
so
completely
understandable.
A
Other
statistics,
core
component
PMP,
core
component
and
power
usage
and
the
first
chart
on
the
left,
is
showing
the
growth
and
the
numbers
around
the
HTTP
requests,
and
so
the
pillars
are
actually
the
HTTP
requests
coming
through
the
core
component
and
powershell.
So
on.
As
an
example
on
November,
we
had
963
million
HTTP
requests
going
through
p.m.
ecor
and
81
million
country,
81
million,
going
through
the
bmv
polish
in
December.
We
went
slightly
down,
which
is
once
again
completely
understandable
due
to
the
holiday
season.
A
There
was
a
lot
of
holiday
additional
days
and
Public
Relation
days
during
december
from
a
tenant
users
perspective,
we
hit
slightly
above
3,000
tenants
in
November
and
in
December
it
was
2800
roughly
tenants.
The
January
numbers
are
looking.
How
would
I
put
it
super
impressive,
so
we
keep
on
kind
of
a
crowing
from
the
November.
Quite
hectic
Lee
as
well.
A
So
december
is
December,
so
we're
slightly
do
the
holidays
and
then
general
is
fixing
the
numbers
once
again
and
right
now
this
are
the
prediction
for
January
is
somewhere
around
1.2
billion
HTTP
requests
going
through
core
component
and
somewhere
around
3200
3300
tenants
using
this
stuff
on
the
right
side.
The
right
side
picture
is
actually
showing
a
request
and
unit
turns
on
a
month
and
combined
or
it's
the
DB
requests,
and
also
the
number
of
tenants
concentrating
well
actually
on
the
PMB
core
and
the
PMP
PowerShell.
No.
Actually,
this
is
the.
A
This
is
the
engineer:
yeah
I
I
was
planning
to
have
a
separate
slide
on
that,
but
then
I
combined
the
slide.
So
sorry
for
not
so
this
is
actual
tenants
and
requests
going
through
and
operating
with
the
BMP
power,
a
BMP
provisioning
engine.
So
in
September
as
an
example,
we
have
599
tenants
and
October
778
tenants,
November
952
tenants
using
the
PMP
provisioning
engine
so
in
our
core
component
there's
a
lot
of
other
stuff
as
well.
But
then
this
is
specifically
for
the
provisioning
engine.
A
In
December,
we
were
in
815
tenants
using
the
PMP
provisioning
engine,
which
is
a
humongous
number
as
well,
and
then
the
the
actual,
bigger
numbers
and
the
pillars
are
showing
how
many
requests
are
going
through.
True
PMP,
core
component
and
the
MP
PowerShell
related
on
engine
and
what's
interesting
around
this
chart
is
that
we
can
actually
see
that,
based
on
this
during
sep
tember
november
october
and
november
and
more
people
were
using
the
BMP
provisioning
and
janet
using
BMP
powershell
rather
than
using
the
core
component.
A
So
you
are
managed
code
to
actually
probation
stuff,
which
absolutely
is
understandable
and
the
PM
a
powershell.
We
have
the
father
of
being
a
powershell
in
the
call
as
well.
Sorry,
Irving
I
always
need
to
do
that,
but
his
the
original
idea
of
that
one
was
absolutely
brilliant
and
it
keeps
on
evolving
and
people
are
using
that
to
provision
sites
and
most
likely
people
are
using
that
to
get
the
configurations,
for
example,
to
sharepoint
online
for
my
creation.
A
So
whenever
you're
migrating
from
on-premises
to
sharepoint
online,
you
probably
want
to
make
sure
that
you
have
content
types
lists
and
libraries
and
all
of
those
settings
waiting
on
the
site
before
you
start
migrating
the
content
and
that's
where
the
BMP
provisioning
engine
and
with
powershell
is
super
super
convenient
as
well,
but
pretty
cool
numbers.
I.
A
Think
I
have
one
or
two
more
kind
of
a
chart
just
to
show
you
and
the
growth
this
economy
interesting
chart
as
well,
even
though
completely
meetings
chart
meaningless
chart,
and
but
it's
kind
of
an
interesting
from
that
perspective
and
that
we
can
do
a
competition
between
the
countries.
So
the
first
table
is
showing
the
order
of
countries
based
on
HTTP
requests
coming
true,
the
BMP
core
and
the
BMP
powershell.
And
it's
absolutely
understandable
that
the
United
States
is
the
biggest
with
that
one
because
they
had
674
tenants
using
this.
A
Using
these
things
in
December
at
the
second
is
Netherlands.
Netherlands
are
pretty
high
on
adapting
latest
technologies.
United
k
UK
is
a
big
one
as
well.
Denmark
Germany,
Belgium,
Finland,
Priscilla
Priscilla,
is
kind
of
an
interesting
one.
If
you
have
a
look
on
the
numbers,
there's
quite
a
small
number
of
tenants,
but
there's
a
pretty
high
consumption
from
a
HTTP
request
perspective
and
the
same
applies
for
Iceland
as
well
from
a
count
of
10
on
perspective,
United
States,
absolute
absolute
lee
number
one
United
guk
second
Netherlands.
Third,
understandable
Germany,
is
a
big
one
as
well.
A
So
that's
understandable,
Sweden,
Denmark,
Australia,
Norway,
Finland
I
think
Norway
actually
passed
Finland
this
month
at
first
time
in
the
in
the
competition
in
quotes
and
then
French
and
what's
interesting.
If
you
have
a
look
on
the
world
map
from
a
let's
say,
adaption
perspective,
there's
some
countries
where
people
mainly
using
on
a
PowerShell
and
then
there's
some
countries
where
people
mainly
use
the
managed
code
version
of
the
of
the
code
or
services.
A
What
we're
providing,
but
the
red
one
essentially
is
the
power
shell
and
the
Queen
one
in
the
chart
is
extend
the
core
managed
code
and
what
what
kind
of
need
a
complete
this
si
a
stupid
joke.
But
what
bothers
me
with
all
of
these
maps
always
is
that
now
on
the
map,
you
can
see
North,
America
and
South
America.
You
can
see
those
charged
over
there,
but
what
is
that
north
america
on
the
right
side?
So
what's
that
area?
A
A
And
then
on
the
right
hand,
but
like
as
we
can
see,
for
example,
for
the
closed
and
opened
issues
during
the
first
week
of
January,
we
had
124
closed
now,
124
closed
items
and
then
slightly
above
open
issues
anyway
and
then
on
the
right
side.
We
can
see
how
many
people
requests
are
being
closed
and
how
many
public
I
start
being
opened
as
well.
A
There
was
a
lot
of
lot
of
a
lot
of
stuff
being
worked
on
by
Irving
Impala
actually
last
week.
So
that's
the
reason
why
there's
a
massive
leap
over
their
couch
now
moving
on
from
away
from
the
statistics
and
by
the
way
there
will
be
time
for
Q&A
today.
So
if
you
have
any
random
questions
and
issues,
let's
open
up
the
audience
as
well,
and
just
a
quick
update
on
day
mr.
A
on
the
modern
experiences
so,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
people
are
aware
of
this
and
then
I
don't
even
have
the
URL
for
this
in
the
slide,
which
is
awesome.
Let
me
actually
write
that
one
there.
So
if
you
go
spb
mb
m
sdn
that
will
actually
learn
to
the
msdn
location,
where
we
have
the
latest
on
sharepoint,
adding
model
development
and
pro
side,
provisioning
and
remote,
remote,
provisioning
and
all
of
them
and
in
there,
in
the
left,
navigation
you'll
find
the
introduction
to
modern
site
customization.
A
If
I
remember
correctly
so
and
there
we
actually
have
five
articles,
and
these
five
articles
are
explaining
the
current
customizations.
That
is
off
the
modern
experiences.
So
what
kind
of
customizations
you
can
do
in
the
modern
sites
and
how
to
be
provisioned
in
what
kind
of
customizations
you
can
do
in
modern
lists
and
libraries
and
what
customizations
we
can
do
a
modern
ages.
So
what
is
the
branding
story?
And
all
of
that
right
now
those
customization
supported
customization
scenarios
are
quite
limited.
We
in
the
SharePoint
engineering
or
working
on
enabling
additional
scenarios.
A
Please
have
a
look
on
the
modern
experience
and
if
it's
not
fulfilling
your
scenario,
do
not
switch
yet
on
using
the
modern
experiences
I
used
and
switch
to
use
the
modern
experiences
whenever
the
modern
experiences
are
fulfilling
your
business
and
functional
requirements,
and
we
will
keep
on
enabling
new
scenarios
right
now.
Good
example.
The
release
the
SharePoint
framework
is
now
on
the
release
candidate,
the
following
things:
what
we
are
working
on,
which
we
actually
told
already
in
ignite
back
in
Atlanta
in
September,
we're
going
to
talk
about
a
work
on
the
chase
link
story.
A
We
kind
of
work
on
the
on
the
tenant
level,
customizations
than
JavaScript
embedding
and
all
of
those
things.
So
those
things
will
be
gradually
enabled
on
the
modern
sites
as
well
in
a
slightly
different
way
and
the
modern
trending
scenarios
will
be
enabled
there
as
well,
and
we
keep
on
telling
and
there
will
be
announcements,
visible
announcements
in
all
of
these.
Whenever
we
get
stuff
out
we'll
get
there,
we
just
need
to
be
patient
and
I
personally,
as
an
X
field.
A
C
A
C
Okay,
so
the
the
purpose
of
this
demo
is
just
to
share
with
you
what
we
want
to
do
or
what
we
plan
to
do
from
a
template.
Formatting
perspective
in
order
to
share
with
you
the
goal
of
feedbacks,
if
any
and
try
to
target
the
right
goal
and
the
right
architecture
for
everybody.
So
probably
you
know
that
whenever
we
handle
a
templated
provisioning
template,
we
have
inside
the
provisioning
angina
a
template
for
matter
model
which
allows
us
to
do
the
translation
from
the
XML
or
from
the
JSON
or
from
whatever
else
format.
C
2016
05
right
now
we
are
already
working
on
a
new
version
of
the
schema
and
whenever
we
release
a
new
version
of
the
schema,
we
need
to
create
also
a
new
formatter
for
that
specific
version,
which
of
course,
is
totally
doable.
But
it
requires
quite
a
lot
of
effort,
because
every
single
for
matter
right
now
has
two
translator
or
to
my
great
properties,
any
information
from
an
object
model,
which
is
any
memory
representation
of
the
xml
document
that
we
have
on
the
persistent
storage.
C
C
In
the
persistent
storage
and
the
same
story,
whenever
we
wanna
load
a
template
from
an
XML
file
from
a
stream
from
the
persistent
storage,
so
we
get
a
stream
and
we
have
to
go
through
all
of
the
information
we
have
inside
the
XML
stream
and
we
have
to
convert.
Let
me
scroll
down
a
little
bit
more.
We
have
to
convert
all
of
the
properties
that
we
have
in
the
xml
file
into
the
domain
model
object.
C
So
now
we
are
trying
to
make
it
easier
for
the
provisioning
engine
and
from
architectural
perspective,
to
do
the
conversion
between
the
persistent
format
and
the
domain
model
objects
that
we
have
in
memory.
The
idea
we
have
right
now
is
to
use
the
out
of
map
/
library,
I,
don't
know
if
you
are
aware
of
it
or
not,
but
it
is
a
a
library,
an
open
source
library,
with
the
same
license
that
we
have
the
MIT
one.
C
It
is
on
github
as
well
as
PMP,
and
it
is
quite
a
good
project
that
most
of
the
developers
of
they
are
already
using
their
own
solutions.
So
our
plan
is
to
leverage
the
same
library
in
the
PMP
provisioning
engine
to
automate
the
map
in
between
the
properties
of
the
object
that
we
have
and
that
come
from
the
XML
representation
of
the
templates
into
the
properties
and
into
the
object
that
we
have
in
the
domain
model
of
the
PMP
provisioning
engine.
C
The
overall
idea,
I
created
a
small
proof
of
concept
that
I
share
with
my
colleagues
in
the
core
team
as
well,
and
Here.
I
am
just
using
the
album
upper
library
which
I
can
get
using
Newgate,
and
here
I
just
create
a
configuration
for
the
Alpha
mapper,
and
my
configuration
is
based
on
a
profile
object,
which
is
this
guy
in
which
I
simply
declare.
This
is
a
small
proof
of
complex.
C
So
I
don't
have
the
entire
object
model
that
we
have
right
now
in
the
provisioning
engine,
but
I
just
define
some
of
the
objects
that
we
have
like
provisioning
template,
of
course,
like
the
composed
look
object
or
the
collection
of
localizations
that
we
have
in
a
provision
in
the
plate,
and
here
I
can,
in
this
profile
file
where
the
profile
type
is
ty
provided
by
the
autumn,
a
poor
library.
I
can
define
all
the
mappings
between
all
of
the
types
that
I
have
so.
C
Of
course,
some
of
the
objects
that
we
have
cannot
be
handled
by
the
ultimate
are
completely
automatically,
and
so
we
are
also
trying
to
figure
out
how
many
and
how
complex
are
the
custom
converters
that
we
need
to
implement
to
do
the
netting
between
the
xml
schema
and
the
dhamma
model
objects
still
using
the
ultimate
our
approach.
So
in
this
profile,
file,
I
just
define
a
bunch
or
just
a
few
mappings
between
what
I
have
in
the
domain
model
and
what
I
want
to
have
in
the
schema.
C
As
you
can
see,
using
some
of
the
capabilities
of
the
ultimate
/
library.
I
can
also
declare
that
I
wanna
do
the
mapping
from
the
provisioning
template
to
the
one
in
the
schema
and
the
reverse
map,
so
that
I
will
be
also
ready
to
translate
to
map
whatever
I
have
in
the
provisional
template
of
the
schema
back
to
the
atomic
model.
Once
I've
done
that,
I
can
simply
create
a
new
map.
/
object
based
on
that
configuration
so
based
on
that
profile,
and
I
can
create
this-
is
just
a
fake
one.
C
A
fake
provisional
template
object
that
they
can
translate
into
the
XML
presentation
of
the
domain
model,
object
and
becca
gain
from
the
xml
representation
into
the
domain
model,
so
that
I
can
using
this
proof
of
concept.
I
can
play
with
a
full
round
trip
back
and
forward
moving
back
and
forward
with
all
of
my
domain
model
objects.
Of
course,
this
way
of
working
will
make
way
more
more
easier
to
do
the
mapping
and
the
translation
in
the
format
of
all
of
the
objects
that
we
have
in
EMP,
so
I
I
can
run.
C
Is
this
sample
just
to
show
you
the
result,
even
if
it
doesn't
really
matter
to
see
that
it
works?
Of
course
it
will
work.
But
here
I
have
a
break
point
and
I
can
show
you
that
if
in
the
source
object,
I
have
my
provisioning
template
with
a
sample
ID
a
sample
set
policy,
a
few
localization
items
and
the
compose
loop
as
well
as
some
custom
properties.
C
So
how
do
we
want
to
use
this
approach
within
the
four
matters
of
the
PMP
provisioning
engine?
Let
me
go
back
for
the
pnp
core
library
source
code
and
let
me
cross
this
guy
here.
I
have
a
custom.
Xml
TMP
schema
version
x
y&z.
This
is
the
one
for
2016
co.
5
ultimate
perform
a
turn
I'm,
inheriting
from
a
base
class,
which
will
be
this
guy
in
which
I
define
all
of
the
basic
information
that
every
single
formatter
will
have
or
will
need,
and
especially
with,
is
still
under
under
construction.
C
So
if
not
one
hundred
percent
ready,
but
here,
for
example,
when
I
do
the
conversion
to
a
formatted
template.
So
I
get
as
an
input
the
domain
model,
provisioning
template
and
I
wanna
reach
on
a
stream
which
will
be,
for
example,
my
xml
file.
I
will
simply
create
a
mapper
object
and
I
will
do
the
mapping
between
the
template
that
I
have
and
the
result
object
today
when
I
use
here.
Of
course,
I
will
have
to
replace
in
this
base
at
the
abstract
class
some
of
the
type
declaration
with
a
generic
version
of
them.
C
So,
for
example,
here
I
have
a
profile
file
that
I
have
already
defined
in
my
branch,
in
which
I
declared
all
of
the
rules
to
do
the
mapping
between
all
of
the
objects
that
we
have
in
the
domain
model
and
in
the
xml
schema
representation
of
our
information.
So,
based
on
these
information,
we
would
like,
first
of
all,
to
share
with
you
the
goal,
the
final
goal
and
to
see
if
you
have
any
feedback.
A
B
A
That's
essentially,
what
we've
been
forced
to
do
in
the
past
is
that
whenever
will
release
a
new
provisioning
skimmer,
we
essentially
replicate
this
amount
of
code
for
that
particular
for
that
particular
scheme,
and
then
we
do
mapping
and
then
we
do
conversions
between
the
versions.
We
double
check
that,
if
it's
a
certain
version,
then
we
do
being
in
here
and
that's
a
really
really
error-prone
approach
and
it's
a
massive
massive
job
to
actually
make
it
happen,
and
that's
why
we
haven't
been
able
to
really
release
new
schema
versions.
Super
super
fast.
A
We
understand
that
there
are
asks
and
people
are
submitting
things,
but
making
that
happen
in
a
reliable
way
in
the
engine
has
been
really
a
challenge.
So
in
the
new
approach,
what
the
looking
to
do
is
follow
that
all
of
these
individual
pieces,
but
paula
is
expanding
and
if
you
take
a
while,
this
is
just
the
code
to
handle
one
schema
for
mitosis.
C
C
A
So
in
the
future
there
will
be
only
essentially
14
matter
for
a
specific
type
and
then
inside
of
that
format
terribly
we
have
the
logic
so
we're
able
to
kind
of
a
split
the
code
in
the
smaller
maintainable
pieces,
and
we
avoid
this
duplication
of
code
and
I
know
that
this
is
super
hardcore
hardcore
stuff
on
the
on
the
implementation
of
the
core.
But
I
do
know
that
there's
some
people
who've
contributed
on
the
core
and
are
following
up
on
what
we
are
doing
quite
closely.
So
we
wanted
to
go
through
this.
A
One,
nigel
is
saying,
absolutely
makes
sense
in
the
entire
window
and
it
might
be
that
will
lost
maturity
of
the
audience
when
we
were
going
through
this,
but
because
this
is
pretty
deep
on
the
on
the
implementation,
how
many
lines
of
code?
Just
to
our
of
curiosity,
we
have
it
just
within
a
wonderful
matter.
We
don't
have.
Actually
that's
a
good
point.
This
just
just
the
show
1000.
A
C
A
Because
it
actually
is
pretty
interesting,
so
people
are
quite
often
we
get
the
feedback
today.
I
want
to
have
this
and
that
I
want
to
have
that
and
the
new
capability
and
everything
else
now.
The
challenge,
obviously,
is
that
the
DMP
engine
is
used
by
more
than
3,000
tenants
and
it's
it's
widely
used
in
production
by
thousands
of
thousands
of
people.
So
we
need
to
be
super
careful
on
the
on
making
changes,
and
these
kind
of
refactorings
are
targeting
to
make
those
changes
to
be
more
easily
doable.
A
B
A
A
Don't
see
any
other
comments
on
the
Iron
window
or
anything
like
that,
I
think
we
might
have
lost
maturity
of
the
audience
in
the
call
which
is
completely
understandable
with
this
discussion,
but
at
least
you
will
know
what
I
working
as
part
of
the
paper
release.
That's
still
the
target,
and
one
thing
maybe
the
actually
mention
related
on
thicker
release,
we're
looking
into
also
getting
the
assembly.
Reference
is
slightly
more
clarified
on
the
core
component
right
now.
A
We're
referencing
certain
assemblies
which
technically
requires
you
to
install
office,
extensions
to
the
machines
and
all
of
that
so
we're
trying
to
get
all
of
that
more
clarified
as
part
of
the
paper
fit
through
our
re-release.
Why
is
it
such
a
hard
word
to
say,
fitter
re-release
then,
anyway,
maybe.
B
C
Our
plan
is
to
do
this
refactoring
of
the
four
matters
and
just
after
the
refactoring,
we
will
go
to
release
a
new
version
of
the
schema
and
we
want
to
wait
for
the
factoring
before
releasing
the
schema
just
to
avoid
writing
one
more
huge
for
matter
before
adding
down
the
completely
factoring.
So,
if
you
can
expect
the
new
formatter
architecture
for
the
februari
release,
the
new
schema
most
likely
will
come
the
month
later,
yep
so
just
to
share
the
plane.
Of
course,
if
not,
there's
no
guarantee,
but
that's
the
plan.
At
least
it's.
A
The
the
skimmer
and
the
news
of
support
within
the
engine
for
the
schemas
well
hopefully
in
the
March
release,
so
at
there's
some
additional
things
in
the
queue
related
on
schemer,
the
current
schema
and
the
current
model.
The
the
provisioning
model
is
already
covering
like
ninety
ninety-five
percent
of
the
scenarios
which
we
can
do
using
the
content
object
model,
but
there
are
certain
specific
requests
which
are
no
queued
up
in
the
provision.
Your
schema
repo,
which
will
be
then
a
trust
with
the
latest
scheme.
A
So
we
can
actually
have
a
disguise
open
discussion,
then,
on
random
other
topics
as
well.
So
on
top
of
this
one
like
mention
we
yesterday,
we
did
have
the
monthly
community
called.
We
went
through
what
has
happened
in
the
past
month
and
everything
else,
and
this
is
pretty
close
and
it
happens
to
be
known
then
that
the
special
interest
group
calls
are
pretty
close.
A
Right
now
we
have
199
comment,
let's
in
the
PM,
a
power
shop
which
is
super
super
impressive,
so
we're
hitting
the
200
moment,
let's
four
different
operations
against
a
bunt
online
or
SharePoint
on-premises,
remotely
most
likely
within
the
next
release.
So
that's
pretty
cool
and
then
well
obviously
depends
on
on
the
ideas
of
people
implementing
certain
comets
and
the
requirements
what
they
have,
but
that's
it
for
now.
Oh,
there
are
still
new
ones
in
the
pipeline:
Thank
You
Ervin,
so
we're
gonna
hit
the
200
common
floods
this
month.
A
If
you
have
any
questions,
if
you
have
any
open,
carnival
hey,
this
is
weathering
me
I'm,
hitting
this
kind
of
an
issue
and
those
are
fine
to
tackle
on
the
Q&A
site.
We
really
want
to
make
sure
in
the
special
interest
group
course.
We
have
time
for
Q&A
as
well,
if
you
prefer
you're
going
to
use
the
iron
window
and
if
you
want
to
give
us
feedback
around
hey,
your
modern
experiences.
Do
not
support
x,
+
1,
see
trust
me.
A
We
know
we
can
address
them
but
feel
free
to
rent
in
the
eye
on
window
as
well.
If
that
helps
anything
else
who
or
what
uses
or
delegation
manager
in
the
core,
and
so
although
the
gation
manager
can
be
used,
for
example,
in
the
web,
asha
web
shops
or
remote
connectivity
quite
often,
actually
it
is
used
in
the
in
in
in
connectivity
of
things
and
I.
Think
ruddy
is
more
thinking.
Okay,
do
we
need
to?
How
do
we
refactor
that
in
the
core,
now
that
we're
planning
to
do
certain
changes
in
notification?
Sorry,
yeah.
B
A
DFS
implementation
because
put
on
premises,
SharePoint
of
Emma's,
okay,
right
and
yeah,
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
identity
model
classes
in
core
as
well.
I'm
also
checking
those
out.
Do
you
have
more
information
about
who
use
them
and
what
uses
them?
I
think
some
of
them
are
used
for
a
dealer
support.
Essentially,
they
are
also
a
copies
of
the
Microsoft
code
inside
core,
so
yeah,
maybe
not
the
best
solution
that
at
that
point,
think
it
was
I,
don't
know
why
we
decided
to
make
it
but
ended
up
and
call
her.
B
B
Well,
while
on
testing
sides,
we
keep
on
expanding,
adding
more
lest
I
think
from
a
engine
perspective.
We
now
have
I
would
say,
like
a
ninety-five
percent
coverage
of
the
engine
functionality
as
being
tested
with
almost
testing
all
the
combinations
of
apply
and
create
parameters
that
you
can
pass
on
any
engine.
So
there
are
some
some
particular
combinations
which
can
not
best
a
bit
think
we're
in
good
shape
over
there.
The
next
thing
around
testing,
I
Jolla,
is
testing
against
the
nose
script
sites
or
the
modern
theme
sites
with
Chef.
B
No
script
enabled
so
I'm,
actually
building
that
right
now.
So
that
will
be
in
also
this
month.
So
we'll
have
a
more
I
will
test.
Each
have
a
test
case
will
run
against
the
no
script
site,
modern
theme
site
to
ensure
the
engine
works
for
those
sites
as
well,
so
that
that's
kind
of
that,
the
bigger
things
coming
up
around
arresting.
A
Any
other
questions
we
have
an
issue
with
one
on
experience
with
the
new
quick
lunch
where
it
will
randomly
add.
Eight
is
resetting
itself.
Sometimes
these
patients
don't
exist
anymore,
so
it
will
this
base,
not
phone.
The
top
navigation
also
doesn't
use
the
normal
navigation
options
from
side
settings.
A
So
I
use
it
was
in
turn
down
on
this
top
one,
but
feels
like
it
might
be
linked
yeah.
So
on
the
these
are
most
likely
on.
It
sounds
like
a
book
yeah.
It
sounds
like
a
bug,
no
doubt
and
on
the
leo,
oh,
it
might
be
actually
on
the
site
and
in
the
last
level
as
well.
But
yes,
it's,
it's
no
doubt
a
buck
and
I,
I'm
pretty
sure
that
we're
actually
fixing
those
things
relatively
fast.
A
The
challenge
is
really
around
the
covering
different
option,
so
the
navigation
options
as
an
example
can
be
super
complex
that
certain
navigation
options
can
be
super
complex
to
implement
in
the
modern
experiences.
So
at
some
point,
certain
persons
have
decided
to
implement
only
some
of
them
and
go
live
with
the
minimal,
minimal,
Viable
Product
version.
A
Even
though
some
of
the
supported
some
of
the
settings
are
not
yet
supported,
I
think,
on
the
as
an
example
on
the
lists
and
libraries
level,
we
don't
support
the
lemon,
its
navigation,
tripping
man,
its
navigation,
trivia,
navigation
and
but
all
of
that
is
in
the
roadmap.
But
we
don't
have
exact
timeline
when
it
will
be
then
added
on
the
modern
experiences,
and
that's
really
the
reason
why
we
are
clearly
calling
out
in
the
in
the
documentation
as
well.
So
have
a
look
on.
B
Yeah,
but
let
us
know
that
this
is
an
issue,
meaning
here
we
need
to.
If
this
bug
we're
weekend,
they're
kind
of
your
profits,
we
can
fix
it
too
often
stories
it
wave,
as
I
have
a
question
to
the
people
here
and
it's
related
to
the
navigation
elements
in
the
provisioning
template
when
you're,
using
that
somewhat
I've
noticed
that
we
add
notes
to
be
existing
the
navigation.
So
you
end
up
with
duplicate
nodes.
B
Now
there
is
a
property
that
you
can
set
actually
to
remove
the
existing
nodes
before
we
add
items
to
its
basics,
clear
out
and
would
like
to
know
how
people
think
if
we
turn
that
French
never
to
year
round.
So
if
we,
by
default
clear
all
the
nodes
in
the
navigation
in
a
quick
lunch
before
we
add
items-
and
if
you
don't
want
that,
you
can
specify
to
not
clear
it
out.
C
B
So
just
one
of
our
people,
think
of
that
it
is
effectively
a
breaking
change
if
you
think
about
it,
because
we
turn
em,
the
diva
behavior
changes,
but
we
might
end
I
think
it's
actually
more
expected
behavior.
If
you
specify
notes
in
your
template,
that
will
be
the
navigation
you
want
and
not
on
top
of
the
existing
ones,
and
if
you
want
to
add
to
an
existing
value,
just
set
up
property
to
false.
C
It's
just
a
given
us
or
to
even
so
far
that's
the
policy
we
have.
We
do
not
delete
anything
by
default
and
more
in
general.
We
try
to
not
delete
anything
just
to
be
sure
that
we
do
not
compromise
anything
in
your
environment.
But
in
this
specific
scenario,
if
you
extract
it
and
played
from
aside
and
you
applied
it
and
painted
blue
another
side,
and
then
you
do
it
again
again
and
again,
every
single
time,
the
notes
in
the
structural
navigation
will
be
added
correct.
C
B
We
do
alternative
could
be,
but
I
know
there
is
some
concern
throwback
serve
as
well
is
adding
an
additional
apply
parameter,
but
we
are
def
pile
of
a
lot
of
apply
parameters,
so
you
can
control
the
default
behavior
if
your
customer
by
default
ones
to
a
to
clean
and
then
add,
okay,
then
the
set
the
parameter
and
then
goethals
of
the
template.
We
do
clean
a
net
yeah
deep.
That
behavior
is
right
now
embedded
in
the
template
itself,
but
yeah.
If
it
a
movie.
B
C
C
B
A
B
B
B
A
And
I'm,
just
starting
the
the
youtube
video
channel
link
there
as
well
so
Steven
was
asking:
can
we
get
a
copy
of
the
audio
so
audio
too?
We
only
publish
our
stuff
right
now
to
youtube
and
that's
all
of
the
the
monthly
recording
sticks,
webcast
and
everything
else
is
in
the
youtube.
So
all
of
these
sessions
are
being
recorded
and
within
24
hours
everything
will
be
in
YouTube.
Now
we
do
understand
that
if
you
would
like
to
download
stuff
from
YouTube,
that's
not
natively
supported
in
YouTube
channel.
A
There
are
computer
free
tooling
in
the
internet,
how
to
do
that,
but
we
simply
don't
have
time
or
resources
to
publish
our
stuff
in
the
in
the
multiple
different
channels.
Unfortunately,
and
channel
9
wasn't
an
option
for
us
to
numerous
reasons
so
but
or
we
used
to
be
in
channel
9,
and
then
we
realized
the
channel.
9
has
a
lot
of
limitations
and
Lester
bigger
limitations
than
in
YouTube's
ur
and
other
things
we're
in
four
minutes
of
closing
the
call
so
we're
closing
pretty
fast
in.
A
We
do
not
have
to
sit
on
the
call
for
the
whole
hour.
Maybe
one
thing
just
the
kind
of
a
pinpoint
we
are.
We
used
to
have
a
highly
active
lemaire
channel
memory,
discussion
group
in
the
office,
365
technical,
wet
networks,
and
if
you
do
have
questions
we
aren't
trying
to
follow
up
on
them
in
the
Microsoft
technical
network.
It's
not
as
active
as
it
used
to
be
an
emer
at
this
point,
because
quite
a
lot
of
people
who
use
to
be
nimer
have
not
transformed
yet
to
the
microsoft
technical
network.
A
B
A
So
quickly,
answering
no
stevo's
question:
that's
take
a
MSSP
PMP
community,
which
is
in
dying
window
on
Russell's
comment
per
couple.
I,
don't
think
we
actually
have
anything
super
super
new
for
on-premises
as
such,
but
obviously
all
of
the
stuff.
What
we
have
in
the
B&B
works
with
sharepoint
2013
or
7
2016.
There
are
certain
limitations,
though.
B
A
So
we've
been
so
the
on-premises
part
of
that
the
partner
back
is
the
starter
kit
for
customers
around
the
self-service
site,
provisioning
and
it's
the
right
now
targeted
for
sharepoint
online,
we're
getting
more
and
more
and
more
and
more
asks
around
the
own
premises.
Version
of
that
particular
thing.
I
can't
remember
who
was
a
tiny
to
go
back
on
the
recordings
on
getting
that
stuff?
A
Maybe
the
working
on
premises
or
a
version
or
adaption
on
doing
that,
and
we
right
now
on
not
planning
to
invest
on
that
one
in
a
really
short
time
frame,
but
more
and
more
pressure
and
more
and
more
questions.
We
are
getting
the
more
high
priority,
man
thing
that
will
be
and
it
seems
to
be
popping
up
all
the
time.
A
So
during
ignite
there
was
a
lot
of
people
asking
that's
stuff,
one
premises
as
well,
because
there's
still
humans
amount
of
people
in
on
premises
and
but
we'll
need
to
follow
up
on
still
on
that
one,
but
no
nothing
new
on
that,
one
for
the
time
being,
unfortunately,
but
we're
heating
the
hour,
let's
actually
close
up
the
call
and
continue.
So
within
two
weeks
we
have
the
special
interest
group
for
BMP
powershell.
So
this
one
is
a
biweekly
call
and
next
time
we
should
have
more.
A
This
show
more
cape
may
be
more
capabilities
and
more
new
stuff
on
the
other
stuff
as
well
within
next
week.
There's
the
special
interest
group
call
for
shipment
framework
and
the
JavaScript
development.
That's
on
Thursday.
Next
week
you
can
find
all
of
the
URLs
in
the
PM
7pm
based
site
or
a
page
in
the
death
toll
of
stone.
But
thank
you,
everybody
for
joining
the
recording
will
be
in
YouTube
within
24
hours.
So
thank
you.
Cheers
bye,
bye,.