►
From YouTube: Microsoft 365 & SharePoint PnP Weekly – Episode 87
Description
In this weekly discussion of latest news and topics around Microsoft 365, hosts – Vesa Juvonen (Microsoft), Waldek Mastykarz (Rencore), are joined by - John Liu, Consultant, Power Automate expert and owner of PowerStudios in Sydney, Australia. Topics Discussed: Will Microsoft take my business idea? Deploying Flow in the enterprise? Bundling Flows into Solutions? What is John's attraction to Power Automate? How he evolved from On-Prem to Cloud to Power Automate and about moving from SharePoint workflows to Power Automate. Additionally, in this episode, 15 recently released articles from Microsoft and the PnP Community are highlighted.
• See the full blog post for this episode at https://aka.ms/M365DevBlog
• Download the podcast for this episode at http://pnpweekly.podbean.com.
• Learn more about the Microsoft 365 Patterns and Practices community at: http://aka.ms/m365pnp.
• Visit the Microsoft 365 & SharePoint Community - PnP YouTube channel: https://aka.ms/spdev-videos
A
Xyn
and
welcome
to
p.m.
free
weekly
episode,
87
and
a
haneda
to
check
it
out
as
immediately
so
it's
15
of
June
at
2020
and
we
do
have
a
visitor
in
house,
but
before
we
go
there
and
let's
actually
start
with
a
quick
intro.
So
this
is
Bambi
weekly.
We
talk
about
all
of
the
stuff.
What's
happening
in.
My
catchphrase
is
to
5
or
SharePoint
Online,
actually,
potentially
even
in
on-premises
Mike's
off
a
trifle.
C
C
C
And
I'm
actually
in
the
middle
of
transitioning,
from
a
consultant
to
a
startup,
so
starting
my
own
startup
wanting
to
try
what
is
making
a
product.
You
know
like
almost
doing
what
I
guess
is
doing
so
living
that
hey
what
is
make
a
product
and
then
all
the
new
things
about
you
know
stuff
I've
never
done
before.
C
A
Yes,
with
that's
actually
quite
a
classic
discussion
point
in
the
in
the
bi-weekly
as
well,
where
we're
quite
often
people
have
this
feeling
that
hey
I
plugged
it
up
put
it
in
Internet,
it's
the
in
the
wiki
of
Kidz
hub.
Why
can't
they
find
it
that's
like?
Well,
they
can't
this.
This
human
has
a
wonderful
information
out
there
unless
you
go
and
tell
them
that
this
is
important
for
you.
How
would
they
know
right
and
let's
actually
talk
about
your
product
and
your
startup?
First,
what's
the
product.
A
C
I
roll
a
lot
of
flows
and
then
I
realized
that
I
can't
find
my
own
flows.
It's
just
too
many,
so
I
decide
that
well,
I'm
gonna
put
that
into
a
single
page
application,
a
web
application
wave
I
log
in
as
me.
It
will
just
list
all
my
flows
and
then
I
can
find
them
quickly.
So
that
too
is
what's
called
flow
studio.
I
then
add
the
power
apps
as
well,
and
then
change
the
name
to
power,
studio
power,
so
the
other
app.
C
It
is
a
freemium
too,
because
I
kind
of
want
people
to
use
it
right.
So
yeah,
it's
mostly
freemium,
but
if
you
run
as
administrator,
you
could
see
everybody's
stuff
so
right
that
that
part
is
premium
so
yeah.
So
that's
basically
me
putting
fun
tools
in
it.
That
I
would
need,
and
then
I
saw
well
if
I
need
to
maybe
other
people
who
needed.
Maybe
I
should
make
the
UI
a
bit
nicer.
So
people
who
use
this-
so
that's
that's
really.
C
The
first
to
that
too,
is
being
around
for
over
two
years
now
and
used
by
four
thousand
more
for
four
thousand
people.
So
it
keeps
increasing
eyes
and
then
from
that
this
I
send
people
newsletter
which
I
skip
every
month,
because
I
just
don't
have
the
good
discipline
to
I
skip
every
other
month.
So
it's
like
if
bimonthly
news,
five
months,
right,
yeah,
yeah
and
then
and
then
a
year
ago,
I
saw
well.
C
This
too
requires
an
MN
to
log
in
and
imagine
you're
the
administrator
that
needs
to
keep
track
of
flows
are
running
nicely
and
every
Monday
you
have
to
log
in
and
check
it
just
seems
very
you
know
this
is.
We
are
supposed
to
be
automating
all
the
stuff
in
such
a
menu
process.
So
I
thought
what?
If
there
is
an
automatic
server
based
thing,
that's
just
checking
for
you
and
then
you
could
see
new
reports.
So
that's
the
second
part
of
it.
C
I
call
it
clarity,
because
I
think
we
could
all
do
with
more
clarity
in
Power,
Platform
and
and
it's
almost
the
thought
of
you
know.
We
talked
about
teams
and
governance
and
five
years
later,
governance
is
a
big
problem
with
teams,
and
you
see
Microsoft
is
moving
to
solve
that
problem.
But
also
there
is
a
lot
of
tools
from
the
community
and
vendors
like
renkel
that
tries
to
solve
that
problem.
A
That's
a
really
interesting
discussion,
because
I
think
one
of
the
discussion
points
and
sorry
for
jumping
directly
on
this
one,
maybe
but
but
on
the
on
the
partner,
let's
say
finding
a
gap
and
then
addressing
a
gap.
How
do
you
feel
then
on
Microsoft
actually
coming
and
okay?
Then
they
provide
the
same
capability
and
then
they
eat
up
your
business
and
is
there
a
concern
on
that
or
what's
the
thinking?
A
Actually
this
is
a
question
for
both
of
you
and
because
I
think
that's
the
classic
discussion
point
of
where
Micra
is
gonna,
be
anyway
come
and
I
need
up
my
idea
and
and
then
they're
they're
evil,
because
that's
natural
transition
and
an
evolution
of
the
product
as
well.
So
is
there
a
partner
opportunity?
How
do
you
say
that
Society.
C
C
I
try
to
answer
first
because
I'm
sure
world
a
has
thought
about
this.
A
lot
but
I
think-
and
this
is
not.
This
is
just
something
I've
said
you
are
always
running
in
front
of
the
steamroller-
that's
pretty
much!
What
you're
doing
as
Astana.
We
could
run
and
quicker
make
this
a
lot
quicker,
but
I
do
also
see
that
from
Microsoft
say
Microsoft
right,
so
we
will
run
and
be
very
specific
and
try
to
talk
in
a
niche
quickly
and
Microsoft
will
come
and
and
take
out
this
scale.
C
A
B
That
is
exactly
that
right.
The
way
I
see
it
is
that
if
you
build
something,
if
you
have
have
an
idea
like
everybody,
has
an
idea
I
the
chances
that
your
idea
is
unique
are
so
slim,
because
there
are
so
many
people
in
the
world
and,
as
you
say
like,
if
you
have
a
problem,
what
are
the
odds
that
somebody
else
has
exactly
the
same
things
you
so
there
are
even
odds
that
whatever
problem
you
have
might
have
already
been
solved
right.
B
So
so
that's
like
the
illusion
that
whatever
you
have,
that
is
the
you
know.
The
next
big
thing.
Well,
maybe
maybe
not
but
I-
think
it
comes
down
to
how
well
can
you
execute
on
it?
How
many
people
you
can
reach
how
much
of
a
problem
it
proves
sexually
B?
Do
people
need
that
because
I
think
the
odds
are
high,
that
imagine
for
the
applications
you
have
built.
It
turns
out
to
be
like
you
build
it,
and
people
see
it
and
everybody
says
we
need
this.
We
need
this.
We
need
this.
B
It's
a
matter
of
time.
Until
that
news
reaches
to
Microsoft
right-
and
at
that
point
they
would
say
like
80%
90%
of
people
who
are
on
Power
Platform
say
they
need
this.
It's
logical,
that's
next
step
that
Microsoft
will
deliver
a
part
of
that
experience
of
these
features
as
a
part
of
the
out-of-the-box
suite,
but
they
will
never
go.
They
will
never
reach
the
depth
you
are
in
because,
from
your
point
of
view,
you
are
expert
in
one
particular
field.
Microsoft
does
the
breadth.
B
They
want
to
offer
that,
like
the
way
I
see
it,
my
son
wants
to
offer
whatever
like
or
what
you
would
say,
20%
of
work
to
cover
80%
of
scenarios.
So
whatever
majority
of
the
feud
needs,
what
is
the
least
amount
of
work?
They
can
do
to
cover
that
if
there
is
20%
of
a
niche
expertise
needed
for
one
particular
case,
that
is
the
partner
room
for
you
for
me
for
everyone
else
to
cover
these.
Are
the
nice
scenarios
like
if
you
want
to
go
really
deep
on
automation,
around
managing
flows
or
managing
flows?
B
Providing
insights
like
even
thing
like
Centers,
Center
off
of
excellence
might
not
even
be
going
that
far
because
again
it's
an
an
an
addition
to
offer
these.
This
addition
of
no
few
features
that
aren't
available
out
of
the
most
basic
need
to
see.
Is
there
a
need?
Is
there
interest?
Can
we
do
anything?
I
mean
like?
B
D
A
Let's
say
the
small
company
opportunities
test
this
always
then
the
additional,
let's
say
the
consulting
the
more
approachable,
smaller
company
who
actually
wants
to
commit
and
help
the
customer,
rather
than
with
their
expertise
and
their
consultants,
who
are
specialized
on
that
particular
topic
rather
than
generalists,
which
are
then
the
people
from
Microsoft
dot
appointments.
But
it's.
B
It
is
one
two
and
also,
and
also
the
verticals,
like
flow
in
healthcare
flow
in
government
flow
in
finance
like
what
are
the
difference.
What
are
the
specific
demands
that
vertical
might
have
that
aren't
available
out
of
the
box
and
which
you
or
somebody
else
could
add
on
top
right,
so
these
are
also
the
cases
that
aren't
always
available
out
of
the
box
because
they
are
just
too
specific,
especially
if
you
even
think
about
global
world
across
like
different
requirements
for
health
care
in
the
u.s.
versus
the
Netherlands
vs.
Australia
yeah.
A
Do
we,
by
the
way
turn
on
on
that
particular
topic
and
multiple
questions?
Actually,
but
just
out
of
curiosity
do
we
have
scenario
and
industry
based
templates
for
flow
or
some
sort
of
a
set
of
galleries
where
people
can
go
and
say?
Oh,
this
is
an
interesting
set
and,
and
design
can
I
pull
it
down,
can
I
use
it
and
then
give
credits
for
the
people
I'm
just
thinking
out
where
we
are
with
flows,
maturities.
D
C
Are
two
areas
out
of
the
box?
There
is
a
whole
bunch
of
templates
that
you
can
search
an
ad
in
the
experience
is
very
much
similar
to
say
if
this
isn't
that
you
know
you
could
say.
Oh
I
want
to
do
something
with
my
outlook
and
then
it
gives
you
a
bunch
of
template
yep.
But
then
in
the
flow
and
the
power
platform,
community
forum
there's
also
a
section
with
more
detailed
templates.
C
So
these
are
exports
or
flows
or
maybe
sets
of
flows
that
people
have
exported
and
then
there's
a
detailed
blog
post
about
how
to
set
it
up.
So
it
requires
a
bit
more
setting
it
up.
You
may
have
to
configure,
say
a
SharePoint
list
to
make
it
work,
but
it's
more
detailed
about
a
more
scenario,
driven
thing
and
also
the
flow
and
power
apps
they
they
are
built
with
the
business
applications
theme,
so
they're
built
with
the
dynamics
theme.
C
So
there
is
a
solutions
framework
that
that
is
involved
in
this
picture,
so
you
could
have
flow
and
power
app
and
multiple
flows,
or
maybe
even
ACDs,
lists
for
tracking
the
entities
open-toe
in
the
solution
and
then
deploy
the
whole
solution
and
being
able
to
manage
the
versioning
and
also
retract
the
whole
solution
as
a
set.
So
for
a
more
complete
and
then
you
know,
we
come
from
the
SharePoint
background
where
we've
lived
in
that
solution,
deployment
well
and
yeah.
D
C
C
B
Is
there
also
a
way
to
include
other
things
into
that
like
team
right,
so
you
would
create
you
would
provision
solution
that
includes
a
team
that
has
a
power
up
to
it.
That
also
has
hideous
and
the
list.
So
can
you
also
include
other
resources
in
that,
or
is
it
very
much
specific
to
the
BP
area
yeah
very.
C
Much
so
it's
very
much
in
the
Power
Platform
and
the
dynamics
area.
So
Sidious
there
are,
there
are
more
stuff
they
are
coming
out
in
the
Power
Platform,
so
the
powerful
agents,
the
bots,
those
will
also
be
deployed
through
the
solutions
framework,
the
ALM,
so
the
application
lifecycle,
management
for
power,
apps
and
flow
are
tied
to
the
solutions
as
well,
similar
very
similar
to
WSP
in
in
integrating
that
with
say
office
size.
C
So
if
you
want
to
deploy
a
flow
too
many
SharePoint
lists,
that
remains
to
be
a
bit
tricky
in
a
solution
from
where
you
can
reconfigure,
which
side
you
want
to
go
to
by
this
still
a
one
to
one
deployment.
You
can
say:
oh
I
want
this
flow.
If
I
want
to
copy
it
to
20
different
sites,
I
end
up
yeah,
you
can
use
devops
to
help
you
replace
the
URLs
you
can
use.
You
can
use
a
flow
to
deploy
flows
so
make
a
copy
and
change
all
the
URLs.
C
In
first
video,
I'm
plucking,
there's
a
little
migrate
to
you
can
manage
one
to
many
deployments
for
for
SharePoint
a
lot.
Oh
yeah
Pizza,
throw
into
those
to
do
are
things
that
I
can
I,
don't
see,
Microsoft,
building
right
I,
like
oh
you're,
doing
solutions
which
is
wonderful
but
handles
one
to
one
in
the
SharePoint
world.
We
one
too
many.
You
want
to
change
the
original
flow
and
reapply
it
to
fifty
copies.
B
Definitely
exactly
right.
So
it's
interesting
to
see
like
crossing
the
like
moving
from
one
area
to
another
and
then
see
okay.
What
if
I
have
this
need
that
is
filled
in
this
space?
In
that
way?
How
would
I
do
it
here
right
and
then
you
come
up
exactly,
as
you
said,
John
with
this
difference
in
re
owes
for
hey
like
how
would
I
do
it
like
what
options
do
I
have?
Is
there
an
API
is
their
solution
framework?
Is
there
some
other
way
to
distribute
that
as
scale
as
opposed
to
just
go?
A
On
the
just
to
close
up
to
partner
opportunities
and
everything,
and
just
another
on
that
one
and
that's
actually
good
good
way
of
explaining
the
the
partner
niche
as
well
and
John.
In
your
case,
it
pays
if
it's
just
so
that
there's
a
gap
and
it's
not
it's
addressing
that
and
then
hey.
Maybe
somebody
else
actually
has
the
same
need
as
well,
and
then.
A
Do
exactly
and
then
ultimately,
who
knows
and
if
it's
a
good
enough
product
who
knows
even
Microsoft
might
buy
it,
because,
even
if
you
think
about
other
what
does
add
iPhone
outlook,
it
wasn't
built
by
Microsoft,
I,
can't
remember
with
the
company
name
and
but
when
we
basically
bought
it
or
something
yeah
yeah,
some
together.
But
it's
one
of
those
that
really
good
examples.
Where
how
excuse
me,
what
is
your
product
idea?
Yeah
we're
building.
D
C
C
Remember
one
more
bit:
I
was
gonna,
add
four
teams.
There
is
additional
work,
so
the
team's
integration
in
being
able
to
create
a
power
app
and
then
bundle
as
the
teams
and
being
able
to
deploy
that
there
is
some
work
that
the
power
platform
team
is
doing
with
the
team's
Microsoft
aims
team
and
that's
a
special
case
in
that
I.
Think
as
the
whole
Microsoft
sees
teams
as
the
next
OS
I,
don't
know
whether
that's
a
I
see
what
x
value
but
I
kind
of.
D
C
B
Like
that
that
I
want
to
ask-
and
maybe
you
know
that
maybe
not
recently
there
was
there-
is
more
attention
towards
or
about
creating
teams
from
a
template.
So
basically
have
this
pre-canned
team
like
if
you
want
to
have
a
team
for
a
project
with
preset
set
of
tabs
and
whatnot
that
you
created
and
yeah,
basically
a
template
for
a
team.
Do
you
know
if
a
template
can
also
include
a
powerup?
Don't.
C
C
A
D
A
Think
we're
still
missing
the
power,
app
reusable
packaging
and
except
from
a
export/import
personal
perspective,
but
the
wider
deployment
packaging.
That's
still
missing,
I
think
that's
the
that,
let's
say
the
gap
here
to
be
fair,
I.
Think
it's
a
it's.
It's
been
a
strategic
decision,
or
so
it
seems
I
don't
have
facts
for
them
to
approach
to
ain't
user
and
power
users
first
and
then
they
start
thinking
the
enterprise
side,
which
is
completely.
D
A
And
in
particular,
from
a
ship
one
side
we
dinosaurs,
we
came
from
on
pregnant
on
premises
and
we
needed
to
figure
out
and
we
were
two
decades
in
on
the
premises
or
whatever
wondering
decade.
So
we
realized
the
importance
of
continents,
enterprises
and
all
that,
and
then
we
started
being
much
more
flexible
from
end-user
perspective.
And
now,
if
you
have
a
look
on
the
ship,
one
we're
actually
further
simplifying
and
simplifying
simplifying
shipment
online
because
it
crew
to
pay
to
complex.
Now.
B
A
A
B
A
C
For
me,
it's
always
learning
new
stuff,
so
I
I
actually
started
in
about
2001
on.net
beta.
So
my
first
project
was
not
related
to
SharePoint
at
all.
I
get
on
that
Peter
when
he
was
launched
in
Australia
with
one
of
a
done.
A
consulting
company
to
SS
Dublin
in
Sydney
I,
pretty
much
went
out
of
university
and
went
straight
into
a
Microsoft
consulting
they
happen
to
run
a
user
group
as
well.
So
very
early
on
I
was
in
the
use
of
the
community.
C
Realizing,
hey
I
could
learn
a
lot
of
stuff
from
what
people
were
sharing
I.
Don't
have
to
have
I'd,
never
play
with
that.
All
that
all
that
and
I
could
just
clean
it
and
I
know
when
I
need
to
maybe
cup
use
it
in
a
con
project.
Hey
now,
I've
seen
something
I
know
a
little
bit
about
that
thing
and
when
I
got
to
SharePoint,
which
is
actually
about
20
2008
I
was
using
asp.net
skills
to
completely
hack.
It
I
was
just
confess
right
now.
I
was
the
Peter's
building.
D
C
D
B
Exactly,
but
that
is
actually
the
thing
I
mentioned
right,
so
my
background
was
back
then
I
would
build
a
lot
of
internet
sites,
just
not
sure
I,
really
like
just
internet
sites
right,
and
that
was
that
was
the
thing
like.
So
there
was
the
mind
so
like
I
want
him
to
be
accessible,
search,
friendly,
ask
for
and
so
on,
and
she
was
like
in
a
way.
It
was
in
my
way
to
achieving
that.
So
I
came
up
with
all
these
hacks
like
I,
want
to
get
her
in
with
I.
B
Want
these
sides
to
be
a
first-class
citizen
on
the
web
and
not
be
like
yeah,
because
it's
sharp
or
you
know,
I,
don't
tell
me
what
I
cannot
do.
Tell
me.
How
can
I
do
that
right?
So
we
would
end
up
with
all
these
hacks
that
in
the
after
side
is
like,
like
yes
will
you
candidate,
but
just
because
you
can
should
you
know.
A
Do
this
so
yeah
so
because
to
be
fair,
I've
used
the
similar
kind
of
things
with
my
customers
back
in
the
time
as
well.
So
it's
nothing
really
really
new
from
that
perspective,
so
anyway,
but
it,
but
our
own
premises
was
different
from
premises.
Absolutely
you're
hacking
that
and
then
suddenly
customers
started
demanding
you
to
learn
cloud
or
how
did
the
transition
get
so.
C
B
C
A
D
C
So
then
I
was
like
well,
we
don't
have
a
end
user
and
also
because
I
came
from
such
a
strong
theft
background.
Where
you
build
everything
almost
when
I
realized
that
okay
I
do
want
to
align
my
career
with
SharePoint,
then
a
internal
realization
was
also
that
jump
before
you
get
on
the
stage
and
tell
people
how
to
hack
everything.
C
Why
don't
you
learn
how
you're
supposed
to
do
a
properly
I'm
first
and
then
you
can
cave
here
and
say
well,
there
is
this
scenario
where
you
really
might
have
to
hack,
but
there's
all
these
other.
You
know
reasons.
I
will
make
this
problematic,
so
you
just
have
to
weigh
the
pros
and
cons
so
that
became
later
my
mess,
which
I
think
aligns
with
many
of
the
SharePoint
professionals.
You
start
out
with
like
oh,
whether
they
come
with
something
too
and
then
over
time.
C
C
C
D
A
C
A
Any
of
let's
say
new
people
in
this
area
and
they
might
not
know
what
is
the
sample
solution,
but
I
think
learning
perspective
Center
solution.
It
wasn't
magic.
We
needed
to
go
there
to
understand
that
we
can
actually
a
stuff
in
a
client-side
because,
like
John,
was
doing
central
solution
quite
soon,
people
realized
that
well
made
it
in
it.
A
It's
actually
better
if
you
build
JavaScript
based
extensibility
using
the
sample
solution
and
then
we're
able
to
push
stuff
a
complex
stuff
which
is
using
jQuery
whatever
was
too
used
at
the
time
and
with
a
flawless
experience,
and
all
of
that
I
mean
hat
also
the
server-side
piece,
which
was
just
okay,
I,
don't
know.
Why
did
we
do
that?
But
but
again
it's
a
natural
transition
from
sandbox
solution
than
the
add-ins
and
from
add-ins
to
the
share
one
favor,
sir
kind
of
yeah.
B
B
It
makes
perfect
sense,
like
we
came
from
this
on-prem
world,
where
you
would
build
net
code,
and
that
was
the
strongest
area
to
extend
their
UI
sure
you
could
like
Baghdad
sure
you
could
have
done
everything
in
UI
jQuery
ins
for,
but
it
wasn't
really
as
strong
like
the
rest.
Api
wasn't
really
there,
so
you
could
have
done.
You
could
have
done
only
that
many
things
comparing
to
what
you
could
have
done
in
server-side
code.
You
could
integrate
with
anything
in
everything
like
you.
B
Had
this
whole
rich
API
that
wasn't
exposed
to
you
beyond
dll's
right,
so
there
was
really
no
other
option
and
then
only
grant
and
gradually
once
see
some
evolved
and
rest
evolved.
Only
then
like
doing
things,
client-side
made
sense
and
then
especially
o365
emerged
in
a
cloud
and
there's
like
no
you're,
not
gonna.
Deploy
d
allows
to
Microsoft
servers,
no
way
buddy,
so
we
needed
a
workable
alternative
for
that
which
has
I'm,
pretty
sure,
also
drove
the
evolution
of
api's
I
like.
A
B
D
A
C
I'm
worried
about
time,
but
there's
actually
more
story
before
we
get
to
flow.
So
like
everyone
else,
oh
my
customizations,
we
in
JavaScript
and
in
the
browser.
So
the
immediate
question
is
what,
if
I
want
to
run
this
on
a
schedule
yep,
what
do
I
want
to
elevate
my
permissions
that
I
don't
have
permission
to
and.
C
So
so
when
ng
functions
came
out
and
we
were
able
to
then
push
PMP
PowerShell
into
the
backend,
that
was
liberating.
That
was
like.
Finally,
you
know
when
we
go
to
the
car.
Microsoft
says:
no,
no,
we're
running
we're,
never
gonna
run
your
code,
get
go
away,
go
away,
get
rid
of
the
code,
but
suddenly
there's
a
way
for
us
to
run
code
in
the
cloud
again,
and
you
know
you
just
have
to
figure
out
who
else?
C
Oh,
my
god,
I
think
we
all
got
much
better
at
off
and
off
and
yeah
different
type
of
ways
to
get
authentication.
Pmb
really
helped.
So
much
like
you
just
or
a
PMP
you
and
oh,
oh
yeah,
and
that
that
was
like,
like
yeah
Owens
work
with
the
BMP
PowerShell
and
being
able
to
run
that
so
that
that
almost
so
then
I
end
up
automating,
all
the
stuff
in
Azure
functions,
and
you
do
run
into
throttling
problem.
So
sooner
or
later
you
need
some
sort
of
orchestration.
C
You
need
some
way
to
say:
look
if
these
function
doesn't
run
I
want
to
catch
it
and
repeat
it.
So
then,
you
think
okay
do
I
build
a
into
function.
Weather
functions
run
out
of
the
five
minute
or
10
minute
period
because
of
retries.
All
these
other
problems
happen.
So
I
came
to
flow
from.
That
angle
is
really
weird:
I
came
to
flow
completely
from
a
developer
angle.
C
I
wanted
an
Orchestrator
I
wanted
something
to
remember:
I
have
a
tasks,
I
need
to
do,
I'm,
gonna,
execute
a
function
and
the
Pharos
I
want
to
retry
and
I
even
want
to
do
exponential,
retry
I,
don't
want
to
do
a
you
know.
Fixed
retry,
so
flow
gave
me
that
so
I
actually
was
looking
for
an
orchestration
logic.
Apps
would
have
been
to
me
equivalent
of
what
I
need,
but
because
flow
at
the
time
also
HTTP
was
part
of
the
standard
at
the
time.
So
flow
was
the
hell.
C
I
already
have
license
I'm,
not
using
it,
and
it's
all.
I
could
use
this
to
call
my
functions
so
I
start
to
do
more
stopping
flow
and
also
at
the
time
flow
was
very
much
in
beta.
Most
of
the
SharePoint
actions
was
missing.
There
was
not
a
lot.
You
could
do
the
very
early
flows,
the
ice,
sorry
before
flow
when
logic
apps
first
came
out
and
had
a
SharePoint
action.
It
did
this
insane
thing.
Okay,
you
gotta!
Listen,
it's
a
it's!
Like
own
item
created.
C
B
D
C
C
Other
box
I
was
just
going
to
go
to
edgy
functions
and
yeah,
but
increasingly,
as
we
see
like,
okay
flow
is
more
target
at
the
power
user
and
we
want
to
go
after
that
replacement
to
SharePoint
workflow,
then,
and
and
also
when
Chuck's,
moved
to
the
flow
sigh
and
started,
adding
all
these
actions
that
was
really
liberating.
It
just
means
I
don't
have
to
write
the
function.
I
just
do
it
in
flow,
which
means
I,
don't
have
to
manage
all.
B
B
You
see
if,
like
how
users,
let's
say
the
more
skilled
users
fill
gaps
in
flow,
they
build
complete.
Our
flow
in
flow
is
like
wait.
A
minute
is
like
very
advanced
scenario,
but
yeah
yeah.
You
know
here
for
you
to
be
able
to
call
an
API,
you
need
to
have
a
token,
and
you
cannot
just
store
it
all.
You
need
to
obtain
a
token,
and
then
it's
like
very
elaborate
thing
to
do.
Not
to
mention
you
need
to
store
credentials
in
for
a
sec
really.
Is
that
the
right
place
so
yeah?
C
Yes,
yeah
so
increasingly
I
just
love
how
many
new
actions
keep
coming
up
and
then
I
started.
So
what
I
would
have
traditionally
wrote
an
edge?
Your
function,
full
I
start
to
say
well,
can
I
do
that
in
flow?
If
I
can't,
then
I
don't
need
to
use
any
function
when
Chuck's
put
in
the
center
gtp
to
SharePoint?
Oh,
my
god,
brilliant.
B
B
C
C
A
It's
regardless
are
you
writing
a
first
party
application,
Oratory,
a
single
page
application,
or
some
whatever,
but
anyway,
whenever
we
get
there
we'll
see
and
one
thing
what
I
wanted
to
still
ask
before
we
go
to
the
articles
and
I
know
that
we're
spending
quite
a
lot
of
time,
but
good
such
a
good
discussion
journal,
the
you
mentioned
the
workflows
and
obviously
we're
pushing
now
heavily
the
the
people
to
move
away
from
the
SharePoint
classic
workflows
and
the
2010
and
2013
workflows
and
start
using
their
power
or
deny.
What's
your
take
on
that
one?
A
C
C
I
think
there
are
so
many
actions
in
SharePoint
that
people
want
and
a
lot
of
them
we
have
to
do
with
send
send
HTTP
to
SharePoint,
and
that
remains
an
area
where
a
consultant
might
be
happy
to
do
it,
but
a
end
user.
It's
like
okay,
unless
I
can
find
a
blog
post
and
just
copy
and
paste
in
there.
A
lot
of
people
that
do
do
this
unless
I
could
find
that
particularly
example
with
the
blogpost
and
just
make
it
work.
It
just
remains
a
little
bit
still
too
hot.
C
So
there
is
that
and
I
think
in
the
platform
itself.
There
is
one
piece
that
I
would
really
like
to
see,
which
is
in
SharePoint.
You
had
this
sharepoint
workflow.
You
have
this
concept
that
I
want
to
wait
until
a
property
changed.
So
imagine
and
the
proof
oh,
is
waiting
and
you're
gonna
wait
for
until
the
item
is
proved
or
until
the
status
on
the
list
is
changed
to
you
know
something
that
remains.
You
can't
do
that
easily.
It's
really
the
old
sharepoint
workflow
is
a
time'
job
that
wakes
up
every
I.
C
Don't
know
15
minutes,
I
think
I'm
gonna
get
the
wrong
anyway,
so
it
wakes
on
every
15
minutes
and
check
and
then
goes
back
to
sleep.
Whereas
flow
is
very
much
a
webhook
based
engine.
So
you
have
to
do
that
properly.
You
almost
need
a
action
that
behaves
like
a
webhook
to
say:
I
want
to
basically
pause
and
sleep
until
this
items,
property
has
changed
and
then
it's
really
good
to
webhook
and
then
continue.
So
you.
B
C
I
think
when,
if
when
we
get
that
I,
don't
know,
I
think
I
think
that
requires
the
engine
based
updates.
So
it's
something
that
logic
absent
low
team
will
have
to
build,
but
once
we
at
that
and
I
don't
really
see,
there's
a
problem
with
what's
remaining
to
to
build
once
out
of
the
box
yeah
yeah,
maybe
the
30-day
limit.
That's
probably
another
one
can.
C
D
B
C
So
to
protect
against
that
for
very
long
running
flows,
you
end
up
saying:
okay,
let's
put
a
parallel
branch
that
time
sell
at
28
days,
kill
the
current
flow
and
restart
it
somehow,
either
Co
HT,
TP
or
update
the
item
or
no
dummy
recent
and
then
just
restart
the
flow
logic.
Apps
the
gap
is
much
bigger,
but
in
logic
apps,
you
can
attach
your
own
integration
accounts
like
bring
your
own
fee,
end
capacity.
C
So
in
logic,
at
you
start
with
30
days,
you
can
extend
that
to
3
months
with
the
integration
account
you
can
extend
that
to
a
whole
year.
So
that's
logic,
app
says
a
lot
more.
You
know
tweaks
about
how
much
how
long
you
want
your
flow
to
run
yeah,
but
that's
potentially
a
problem.
We
do
have
workflows
that
take
a
very
long
time,
so
you
either
have
to
build
it
differently
or
or
you
just
have
to
be
beat
people
up
before
they.
A
A
Let's
do
some
articles
before
we
close
up,
so
we
don't
take
way
too
much
time.
I
think
we're
still
in
the
schedule
hitting
the
one
hour
time
frame
or
so,
and
some
articles
from
the
last
week
pretty
silent
or
a
slow
week
in
in
many
perspectives
and
do
many
many
reasons,
but
some
new
articles
from
Microsoft
script
lab
now
supports
outlook.
So,
basically
you
can
do
automatic
scripting
directly
in
Outlook,
which
is
pretty
cool.
Actually,
so
you
can
automate
stuff
almost
like
building
your
own
Outlook
flows
mm
or
is
it
no?
It's
not
flow.
A
C
A
B
A
Now
some
other
new
articles
and
this
one
came
last
week
as
well
built
monster
themes,
apps
with
resource
to
do
users
to
their
code.
Extensions,
so,
basically
a
kind
of
a
reminder
on
the
fact
that
in
the
build
will
release
this
much
of
themed
extensibility
and
which
is
in
preview
still,
but
basically
making
it
easier
to
build
Microsoft
themes,
applications
and,
in
this
case
using
javascript,
but
the
extension
integrates
directly
in
visitors
to
their
code.
So
you
can
actually
spin
it
spin
up
stuff
and
I
unless
I'm
completely
mistaken.
A
So
this
is
the
visitors
to
their
code.
Part
and
the
visitors
to
their
templates
are
in
what
they're
coming.
We
haven't
yet
release
them,
so
they
should
be
coming
pretty
soon
as
well
and
but
really
making
sure
and
making
it
easier
to
build
Microsoft
themes
and
tabs
and
books,
and
all
of
that
stuff
now
is.
This
is
gonna
place,
SPF
X
for
Microsoft
themes.
Not
at
all
is
this
kind
of
replace,
hey
yo
teams
for
Microsoft
themes,
development,
nope,
that's
different.
B
A
Different
objectives,
different
different
well,
technology
is
behind
the
scenes
and
they're,
basically
just
additional
tools
within
your
tool
kit,
and
then
you
choose,
which
one
do
you
wanna
use
and
again
as
an
example,
because
we
mentioned
authentication.
That
is
a
good
example
where
SharePoint
framework
absolutely
absolutely
stays
this
one,
because
the
off
it's
just
taken
care
of
you
don't
have
to.
B
A
A
Maybe
for
those
who
know
where
there's
no
other
host
a
dead
end,
which
we
did
not,
it
was
never
actually
going
ta
because
we
were
unable
to
figure
out
the
cost
model
for
him
anyway
go
and
have
a
look
on
the
internet
and
find
what
for
so
that,
if
you
don't
know
what
it
is,
this
one
was
released
last
week
as
well.
So
this
is
now
the
official
documentation
related
on
supporting
embedding
the
portal
and
directly
in
the
Microsoft
themes
as
well.
So
that's.
A
This
is
obviously
important,
exposing
an
individual
page
and
then
you
can
click
and
read
articles
and
all
of
that.
But
this
is
one
of
those
holy
crao
requests
from
the
customers
and
to
actually
embed
the
polo
directly
in
themes
so
having
their
corporate
communications
to
get
a
bit
collaboration
in
a
single
tool.
Sir
and.
A
And
we
do
call
out
all
of
the
different
limitations
and
also
it's
really
important
to
see
and
right
now,
there's
no
native
navigation
or
footer
is
gone.
The
header
is
gone
and
all
that
there
will
be
adjustments
and
all
of
this
stuff
later
on.
Well,
there
will
be
more
native
support
for
this
one
right
now
you
have
to
actually
build
the
application
using
apps
to
do
to
make
it
exposed
as
a
personal
application.
So
you
need
to
do
some
level
of
a
configuration
again
configuration
nut
code
to
make
it
actually
exact.
A
B
A
C
C
So
I
was
thinking
through
hacking,
the
digging
through
how
its
implemented
and
I
realized
that
it's
actually
all
calling
our
API
is
to
do
it
and
one
of
the
API
Sequoia
is
this
one
Co
execute
size
group
action
and
it's
actually
being
around
for
I,
think
it's
being
updated
to
the
C
song
since
early
this
year,
by
only
so
a
recently
and
so
I
went
and
dig
around
the
API
tried
to
find
more
information
is
not
well
documented.
I,
don't
know
whether
that's
intentional,
whether
I
should
have
fell
and
document
that.
C
But
what
that
means
really
is
that
we
can
use
a
size
group
like
this,
create
a
speed
list
with
the
subjection
to
set
your
title,
because
you
know
you
want
to
create
a
list
with
no
spaces
and
then
change
the
title
to
with
space.
That's
a
SharePoint
ritual
that
we
have
to
obey,
but
you
can
also
create
custom
fields
like
XML
field,
for
your
gems
and
I,
really
like
this
I,
really
like
skills
that
we
can
learn
in
office,
365,
so
learning
sites
groomings
you
could
use
it
with,
creates
I
out
of
the
box.
C
You
can
now
use
flow
to
execute
and
is
completely
a
standard
flow
action,
so
you
don't
need
to
have
premium
to
KOed
your
functions
or
some
something
like
that,
and
also
you
can
code
this
from
SPF
X,
so
you're
viewing
SV
epic.
So
you
just
want
to
say:
Oh
deploy
my
SharePoint
web
power,
but
if
the
list
that's
backing
it
doesn't
exist,
then
quickly
run
this
thing
and
then
it
creates
in
this.
D
C
C
A
C
Complex
state
machines,
maybe
and
even
maybe
backed
by
a
SharePoint
list.
So
this
is
a
kind
of
his
latest
all-round
video
that
describes
all
the
little
tricks
and
how
do
you
design
the
whole
solution
and
maybe
even
have
a
power
apps
to
see
the
status
of
your
various
approvals
and
who
is
the
up
and
I?
Don't
want
to
reassign
that
step
to
someone
else?
All
back
your
SharePoint
lists
or
CTS
or
sequel
kind
of
backing
is
agnostic.
So
are
very
interesting
and
comprehensive
video
to
go
through.
C
D
A
B
So,
in
the
last
version
of
office,
5
CLI,
we
have
added
new
report
meant
for
upgrading
your
SPF
x4
from
one
version
to
another.
In
the
past,
we
would
have
only
a
report
based
on
text
or
mug
down,
and
these
would
like
a
report
would
will
give
you
an
overview
of
all
the
different
steps
that
you
would
need
to
go
through
to
upgrade
the
project
and
it's
it
goes
way
beyond
just
upgrading
to
versions,
because
sometimes
you
need
to
update
a
piece
of
code.
B
Sometimes
you
need
to
change
something
in
manifest
and
in
this
report
type.
So
in
this
version,
we've
added
new
report
type
based
on
the
vias
code,
tour
extension,
which
is
basically
a
very
interactive
way
available
only
in
vyas
code,
in
which
we
can
take
you
directly
through
each
file
in
projects
that
is
affected
by
the
upgrade
and
take
you
exactly
to
this
place
and
tell
you,
okay,
change.
This
line
in
this
line
change
this.
D
A
Really
cool
stuff,
really
really
cool
stuff,
so
I
don't
have
to
worry
about
upgrading
or
trying
to
figure
out
how
do
I
upgrade?
No,
no
everything
is
being
given
for
you,
so
pretty
cool
stuff.
This
one
is
from
Harsha
martini,
so
get
all
content
types
and
content,
a
cup
using
SharePoint,
REST,
API
D
2
point
1
using
javascript,
so
this
might
be
slightly
confusing,
and
we
have
this
slightly
even
weird
naming
convention
for
some
of
the
REST
API.
So
there's
a
v2
API
and
there's
a
vision,
2.1
api
I
do
not
have
exit
the
insight.
A
Why
did
we
decided
to
call
it
2.1
in
API,
but
still
there's,
basically
a
access
points
which
are
backing
backed
or
backing
the
Microsoft
graph?
Api
is
for
content
types
as
well,
because
content
type
has
a
graph
equivalent
api's,
and
these
are
the
native
api's
and
the
difference
of
what
goes.
They
please
use
Microsoft
graph,
always
when
possible.
A
But
then,
if
you
are
in
Chaves
crypt
in
SharePoint,
you
don't
have
to
go
through
the
permission
down,
because
you're
gonna
hit
the
v2a
end
point
as
well,
and
that's
basically
then
gives
you
access
without
the
craft
scopes
and
permission
and
all
of
that
stuff.
So
more
simplified
thing
to
do
done.
I
can
see.
John's
and
John
is
basically
already
figuring
out.
Oh,
but
in
a.
A
A
Do
you
want
to
do
this
again
debatable,
but
then
this
one
would
change
your
theme
setting
to
be
based
on
the
selection
of
the
infuser
is,
if
they're,
using
the
dark
setting
on
on
themes
or
not
so
good
way
of
hunting
that
obviously
hard
coding
styles
is
not
really
the
best
thing
to
do.
But
again,
if
there's
basically,
three
different
theme
options
for
tips,
there's.
B
B
A
Had
a
a
deploy,
perfect
solution
of
multiple
sizes
and
kidnap
actions
and
orchestras
to
us,
the
CLI
is
a
basically
automation
of
deployment
of
stuff
and
CLI
does
support
all
this
stuff,
so
quite
easily
doable
right,
welding,
correct
yep
and
you
could
use
BMP
PowerShell
just
as
well
again,
multiple
different
tools
from
which
you
can
choose.
What
is
the
right
one
for
github.
A
Not
in
kids
have
actions
good
point
good
point,
but
yes,
that's
true
as
well,
because
the
PMP
poacher
core
is
coming
and
then
that
might
actually
change
find
all
pages.
You
do
as
much
Jesus
learning
pathways
back
part
and
this
one
is
basically
from
originally
from
Lori
and
as
a
question
and
then,
as
the
Boston
labor
just
provided
the
answer
for
it
now.
What's
just
multiple
things
here
is
basically
this
gives
you
the
story
on.
A
How
can
you
find
all
of
the
pages
which
are
using
explicit
Wetwork
and
that's
the
unique
gooood
of
the
learning
pathway
and
but
being
people?
Shell?
Has
this
pretty
awesome,
submit
BMP
search
query
comment,
light
which
will
give
you
the
enter
execution
options
on
that
so
really
cool
stuff.
The
easiest
way
to
store
the
easiest.
Isn't
that
yeah?
You
sure
that
that's
the
easiest
way?
Yes,
okay,.
A
B
A
From
your
perspective,
a
visit
D
exist
anyway,
so
the
whole
point
being
on
the
fact
that
there
are
this,
basically
a
application,
specific
storage
in
the
craft
which
you
can
actually
use
for
the
applications
smell.
Okay,
that's
that
actually
gives
you
slightly
more
insights
and
that's
actually
pretty
cool
so
and
I,
don't
think,
like
you
noted
on
the
blog
post,
not
that
many
people
probably
are
aware
that
there
is
this
option
available.
Sir
yeah.
B
B
C
B
Creates
a
folder
and
file
in
onedrive
so,
and
that
is
just
being
part
of
the
sync
right,
so
whatever
you
put
in
there
is
available
in
onedrive.
So
if
you
open
the
app
on
the
phone,
if
you
have
desktop
app,
if
you
have
browser
app,
you
can
you
can
access
settings
in
the
same
way
and
you
update
them
from
single
place
and
their
sync
all
over
so
and
also
like
this.
This
is
a
perfect
approach.
B
If
you
build
a
single
page
app
that
consists
only
of
clients
ID
code,
so
you
you
don't
have
your
own
database.
You
don't
store
anything
by
yourself!
Well,
right
because
like
if
you
have
a
database,
you're
probably
started
there,
but
if
you
don't
have
anything
so
if
you
build
a
SP,
FX
app
or
teams,
personal,
app
or
single
page
app,
and
you
don't
have
a
back-end
storage
well,
that
is
a
perfect
option
because,
like
if
you
get
this
for
for
free
yeah,.
A
C
B
You
can
give
it
to
user
and
the
best
part
is
it's
a
file
in
their
account,
so
they
can
see
what
you
store
for
that
like
they
can
open
it.
They
see
a
file
if
they
don't
like
it,
they
remove
it
like
it's
there.
It's
basically
the
same
way
as
if
you
install
a
desktop
app
and
it
creates
a
file
on
a
disk.
It's
the
same
thing.
D
A
Now,
this
one's
really
cool
from
David
Romero
how
to
make
minecraft
requests
using
PMP
and
office
traders
to
fast
their
lives
so
basically
demonstrating
how
to
get
the
access
token,
how
to
authenticate
how
to
call
things
to
be
one
of
the
really
the
beauties
of
PMP
PowerShell,
comparing
if
we
can
would
compare
that
to
the
sharepoint
or
not
powershell
is
that
you
can
actually
do
all
of
this
stuff.
So
you
can
actually
get
access
to
access
tokens
and
I
know
authenticate
and
you
can
easily
hit
those
endpoints
and
pretty
same
actually.
A
D
A
Exactly
now,
this
is
slightly
more
complicated
because
that's
not
using
the
BMP
PowerShell
and
to
be
PowerShell
actually
can
automate
all
of
the
settings
and
the
creation
of
that
registrations.
All
of
that
behind
the
scenes,
which
is
actually
pretty
awesome,
so
you
don't
wouldn't
have
to
do
this
because
it
can
actually
create
the
backend
settings
in
Asha
for
you,
but
again,
I
think
the
user
scenario
is
pretty
much
then
exactly
the
same
so
and
getting
accessed
on
hitting
API,
and
all
of
that
is
pretty
much
the
same.
A
Now
this
one's
from
Alex,
this
good
pointer
from
Alex.
We
had
a
memory
leak
created
recently
into
office,
365
entry
of
the
BMP
authentication
manager
and
they
had
a
back-end
which
was
basically
using
that's
extensively
and,
and
then
we
did.
The
fix
here
is
to
use
the
dispose
method
so
using
a
SAS
tomorrow
as
the
guidance.
A
So
you
remember
the
dispose,
remember
the
dispose,
because
behind
the
scenes,
if
you
open
up
a
trait
which
doesn't
get
disposed,
then
you
can
see
and
memory
leaks
like
that
one
and
then
a
final
thing
from
Sergei
is
how
do
I
fix
a
delayed?
You
note
modules
for
Windows-
and
this
is
actually
I've
seen
this
in
the
past
as
well
and
I'm,
using
my
own
tricks
and
to
do
this,
but
it's
good
that
somebody
actually
works
about
it.
A
A
It
seriously,
there's
massive
difference
and
it's
just
speeds
and
about
streamlines
that
the
whole
process
so
and
he's
walking
through
how
to
can
add
this
fast
delete
option
to
say
right,
click
on
the
windows,
and
so
that's
pretty
cool
cool
and
that's
it
I
think
somebody
has
a
meeting
starting
in
in
one
minute
unless
I'm
completely
mistaken.
No
words
like.
A
A
A
B
D
A
D
A
A
So
Wow,
so
basically
one
of
these
virtual
big
virtual
conferences
is
happening
during
this
week
so
and
that's
I'm
joining
at
least
in
my
session
and
Jeff
Sessions
also
questions.
So
if
there's
any
technical
questions
but
and
then
then
s
perfect
steams
for
me
anything
any
what
you're
doing
on
this
week
well
like
any
Wednesday.
B
Whether
we're
doing
yeah
so
unless
day
we're
doing
a
webinar
ranker
about
what
are
the
different
things
you
have
to
know
before
you
deploy
SharePoint
framework
solution
package
to
production.
So
what
are
different
things
as
an
admin?
You
should
know
up
front
so
investigating
all
different
angles.
Like
api's
permission,
request
dependencies
on
other
libraries
hosting
location
has
a
four
time
zone.
So
we
will
explain
off
that
walk
you
through.
B
C
Last
month
had
quite
a
few
virtual
conferences
that
I
presented
in
this
month,
I
had
to
go
back
to
my
startup,
make
sure
getting
slowly,
the
second
app,
which
is
correctly
the
scanning
one
and
the
monitoring
one
that
one
is
actually
the
trial
is
actually
people
can
sign
up
to
trial.
Now
so
I've
been
busy
in
the
backend
making
sure
the
answer
functions
don't
fold
them.
C
C
Yeah,
what
can
the
reporter
people
want
to
see
and
then
can
I
want
to
hit
a
button
that
we
start
all
the
flow?
That
seems
incredibly
crazy.
We
could
do
it,
but
there
could
be
a
lot
of
bad
effects.
Imagine
your
flow
run
twice
and
yeah,
so
so
a
lot
of
thinking
around
that,
but
just
making
sure
the
lights
alone
and
don't
fool
them.
That's
actually.
A
C
B
C
A
Yeah
anyway,
so
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
this
one
Thank
You
waldek
for
joining.
Thank
you,
John,
really
good
discussion
from
a
different
perspective
and-
and
it's
actually
good
to
hear,
what's
happening
on
your
side
of
the
technology
as
well,
so
really
really
cool.
Hopefully
you
don't
learn
too.
Hopefully
you
don't
have
to
do
any
double
yesterday.
Packages
this
week
also.
B
D
C
A
A
A
But
that's
separate
discussion
and
then
they'll
say
a
new
blog
post
coming
up
also
related
on
star
a
SharePoint
starter
kit
v2,
which
is
now
out
where
they
actually
have
a
lot
of
new
web
parts
and
the
individual
web
parts
can
be
installed
separately,
which
is
a
good
thing,
so
you
can
actually
take
one
of
the
let's
say
your
email
with
Ireland.
What
can
play
that?
One
to
your
tenants
and
not
install
all
of
the
other
web
fonts,
which
is
a
quite
classic
requests
for
the
starter
kit?
What
about
the
stuff
as
well
but
I?