►
From YouTube: Microsoft 365 PnP Weekly – Episode 106
Description
In this weekly discussion of latest news and topics around Microsoft 365, hosts – Vesa Juvonen (Microsoft) | @vesajuvonen, Waldek Mastykarz (Microsoft) | @waldekm, are joined by Business Apps MVP Serge Luca (Power Platform Associates) | @sergeluca. Discussed in this session – Serge’s interest in Power Platform, connectors, need for more reference implementation and database selection - CDS, SQL/Azure, SharePoint, hybrid? A quick tour of the workflow companion management tool Serge has been evolving called BPM and 20 recently released articles and videos from Microsoft and the PnP Community are highlighted in this session. This episode was recorded on Monday, November 23, 2020.
References:
• See the full blog post for this episode at https://aka.ms/M365DevBlog
• Download the podcast for this episode at http://pnpweekly.podbean.com.
• Learn more about the Microsoft 365 Patterns and Practices community at: http://aka.ms/m365pnp
• Visit the Microsoft 365 Patterns and Practices community YouTube channel: https://aka.ms/m365pnp-videos
A
Welcome
everybody:
this
is
bmp
weekly
episode,
106
in
this
23rd
of
november
2020,
and
before
we
go
to
our
visitor
this
week.
A
quick
recap:
dmp
weekly,
is
all
about
the
latest
in
microsoft,
365
platform,
including
the
microsoft
messaging
and
the
community
messaging
once
a
week
recording.
Unless
we'll
have
a
holiday
break,
will
we
have
a
holiday
pre-aquatic?
I.
A
B
A
C
A
C
No,
no!
No!
No,
because
no,
it
depends
on
the
the
data
storage.
Some
people
who
come
from
a
dynamic
dynamics,
environment
used
to
use
the
cds,
but
most
of
my
customers
are
actually
a
customer
working
in
an
office,
35
environment.
They
have
document,
they
have
metadata,
they
want
to
automate
things.
So
that's
why
my
focus
is
on
on
there,
but
they're
different
than
many
different
type
of
customers.
Yes,
yeah.
A
And,
and
for
the
past
years,
we've
been
obviously
heavily
heavily
as
a
microsoft,
we've
been
heavily
investing
on
the
power
platform,
and,
and
can
you
can
you
talk
about
your
let's
say
perception
or
our
feelings
about
the
transition
within
the
past
years?
It's
been
pretty
amazing
when
you
think
about
where
we
started
with
power,
automate
and
power
platform
like
three
years
ago
or
five
years
ago,.
C
And
now
it
seems
to
be
in
everywhere,
yeah
almost
four
years.
Yes,
so
what
is
very
interesting
is
that
we
have
more
and
more
offices,
well,
microsoft,
365
connectors
and
the
sharepoint
connectors
are
still
the
first
class
citizen
okay,
so
we
have
more
and
more
sharepoint
features
and
no
more
and
more
teams
features
integration
in
the
platform,
and
now
we
have
oakdale,
which
is
the
the
mixture
of
our
platform
and
teams
which
make
this
microsoft
35
environment
more
important
than
before.
So
we
have
more
and
more
connectors,
more
and
more
integration.
A
C
I
think
yes,
yes,
yes,
actually,
the
in
the
platform,
there
is
a
native
database
which
is
which
we
call
cds,
the
common
data
service,
which
require
a
premium
license
which
was
kind
of
expensive
right
and
now
microsoft
moved
this
cds
into
team.
So
people
want
to
create
a
team.
Application
can
benefit
from
cds
for
free.
C
There
are
some
limitations,
so
knowing
the
limitation
is,
of
course,
very
important
in
terms
of
capacity
in
terms
of
security
model
etc,
but
still
that
makes
the
cds
very
very
very
attractive,
so
we
don't
have
to
deal
with
sharepoint
lists,
so
many
customers
still
using
sharepoint
even
for
complex
application,
but
in
some
cases
cds
is
more
important,
more
interesting.
So
for
big
applications.
Yes,
so
you
can
play
on
different
on
different
different
parts,
different
options,
so
no
you
can
choose.
I
mean.
B
So
the
one
thing
I
wanted
to
ask
right
right,
a
while
back.
I
I
believe
you
were
the
first
one
to
come
up
with
a
concept
like
how
would
you
authenticate
from
a
flow
towards
graph
right
because,
like
like
back
then
I
think
there
were
whole
connectors,
so
you,
if,
if
you
wanted
to
do
anything
with
graph
like
you,
would
need
to
do
your
whole
all
flow
which,
for
let's
say
a
person
without
developer
background,
is
not
trivial
right.
So
where
do
we
stand
with
that
today?
C
No,
as
long
as
you
define
your
application
in
azure
I
mean
you
just
pass
the
azure
information,
and-
and
that's
it
that's
quite
straightforward,
but
people
of
course
need
to
know
what
is
an
application
azure
and
what
are
the
different
permissions
that
they
can
use.
But
it's
very
easy
nowadays
I
would
say:
yeah:
okay,.
C
A
Yes,
yeah
yeah,
I
think
that's
one
of
the
one
of
the
areas
where
somehow
in
microsoft,
we
need
to,
let's
say
fine-tune
or
polish
the
process,
because
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
our
tools
are
just
assuming
that
hey
just
register
an
application
id
and
security
and
here's
automation
how
to
do
that.
Just
click
here,
but
I
said
yeah,
but
I
don't
have
permissions
to
do
that.
There's
like
two
persons
in
my
company
who
has
the
permissions
to
exactly
so
it
we
we
need
to
sum
in
azure,
80
or
somehow
differentiate.
C
And
that's
an
issue
when
you
use
the
power
platform,
because
these
people
using
power
platform
want
to
do
everything
themselves,
okay,
so
that
they
can
do
almost
everything,
including
the
database.
Whatever.
If
you
use
a
cds,
you
don't
need
sql
azure,
you
don't
need
to
ask
people
who
manage
sql
azure.
You
can
do
that
on
yours
on
your
own,
but
indeed,
when
you
have
to
deal
with
the
graph.
That's
that's
a
blocking
situation
because
it
take
can
take
a
week
or
two
before
you
get
the
authorization
yeah.
C
B
But
I
guess
in
a
way
it
is
an
interesting
point
right
because,
like
you
would
think
like,
if
you
look
at
the
graph,
it
has
kind
of
these
two
types
of
data.
You
can
access
right.
It
has
your
your
own
stuff,
like
your
own
meetings
and
calendar
and
files
and
whatnot,
and
then
there's
everything
else
like
files
from
a
random
site
or
search
that
goes
across
a
tenant
like
you
could
even
think
that,
like
what?
B
What
if
there
was
the
notion
of
a
personal
aid
app
that
can
only
have
access
to
personal
or
that
for
which
you
can
grant
only
the
personal
scopes,
and
with
that,
you
can
only
access
your
own
data
and
as
such,
it
doesn't
require
the
scrutiny
that
you
would
have
otherwise
for
a
full-blown
idea.
That
can
do
anything.
You
want
right.
Yes,
yes,
it's
true,
that's
correct!
Yes,
we.
A
Need
to
work
on
that
one,
certainly
in
microsoft.
I
think
there's
there's
still
so
much
improvements
on
this
area,
but
we've
gone
off
long
way,
already
right,
so
and
and
moving
away
from
the
old
acs
model
and
permission
adding
model
which
freaked
out
a
lot
of
people,
and
then
people
moved
away,
which
is
understandable.
It
wasn't
super
super,
clean
and
and
moving
to
the
right
to
the
microsoft
trees,
thrive,
application
and
then
simplify
that
process,
but
still
the
scopes
are
too
too
too
and
too
wide
right
to
broad
to
prod.
A
A
C
C
So
so
why
would
they
use
cds
instead
of
instead
of
sharepoint
list?
Well.
First,
the
relation
model,
of
course
of
cds
is
stronger
than
the
one
in
sharepoint,
so
because
in
cds
you
have
automatic
management
of
one
too
many,
and
many
too
many
you
have
transactions
as
well.
You
don't
have
the,
for
instance,
the
permission
limitation
that
we
have
in
sharepoint,
so
in
some
applications,
especially
in
my
bpm
toolkit,
there
are
some
limitations
of
unique
permission.
When
you
deal
with
hr
data,
every
row
must
be
uniquely
secure
right,
you
see.
C
So
if
you
have
a
lot
of
dhr
data
somewhere,
plus
the
transaction
linked
to
the
sharepoint
data,
I
mean
you
will
reach
the
the
heart:
25
000
limited,
unique
permission
limitation
and
the
good
practice
is
5000,
so
you
can
quickly
reach
this
limitation.
So
that's
why,
depending
on
the
type
of
application,
it's
better
to
switch
to
to
cds
or
to
keep
sharepoint,
so
it
all
depends
on
what
you
do.
B
C
Sometimes,
when
you
want
to
authorize
people
to
see
some
record
in
the
list
or
in
the
table,
whatever
the
security
model
behind
can
be
complicated
and
so
and
that's
something
that
are
kind
of
complex
to
implement
in
sharepoint,
because
you
have
to
play
with
unique
permission,
so
you
have
to
authorize
a
mixture
of
group
and
a
mixture
of
people
and
and
and
it's
complicated
right
so
right
and
you
doing
that
in
cds
is
way
way
easier.
No,
no
in
oakdale,
so
in
teams.
C
B
C
Yeah,
so,
first,
if
you
want
to
create
a
more
collaborating
application,
I
would
say:
use
cds
in
teams
use
data
first,
the
free
version.
That
should
be
the
the
the
first
option
unless
you
have
a
good
reason
to
use
sharepoint
but
use
cds
in
team.
No,
your
data
could
be
in
sharepoint
as
well,
so
you
can
have
a
mixture
of
document
in
sharepoint
the
seal.
You
want
to
store
relational
data
in
cds,
okay,
so
you
can
have
a
mixture,
hybrid
application
teams
and
sharepoint.
A
C
Attachment
don't
forget
attachment,
so
calculation
is
complicated.
Do
you
have
a
lot
of
attachment?
You
have
just
rows.
If
you
just
have
rows,
then
the
free
cds
is
okay.
If
you
have
attachment,
then
it
probably
won't
be
okay,
so
you
can
still
use
it
but
store
your
document
in
in
document
library.
The
secure
way
in
sharepoint
right
now.
Next
is
a
security
model.
If
it's
complex,
if
you
have
a
complex
security
model,
I
would
say
use
the
pay
version
of
cds.
C
C
B
C
A
C
A
C
A
So
how
did
you
ended
up
so
you're
moving?
Let's
go
back
into
historical
things,
so
how
did
you
ended
up
actually
moving
in
and
getting
interested
on
the
power
platform?
What
was
the
do
you
remember?
You
said
that
you
freaked
out
on
the
sharepoint
adding
model
which
is
understandable.
A
lot
of
people
do
yeah
and
they
don't
work.
No.
A
C
C
B
C
Well,
first,
the
first
part
of
your
question:
is
it's
not
just
a
power
user
right,
so
you
see
more
and
more
developers
using
the
power
platform
and
I'm
a
developer.
So
I
was
net
in
c
plus
first
developer
and
I
really
like
using
the
platform
because
it's
easier
and
you
can
quickly
get
something-
a
prototype
that
you
can
show.
Your
customer
and
customer
can
make
some
ask
for
more
modification,
et
cetera,
so
in
the
whole
life
cycle
you
can
go
faster.
C
However,
there
are
some
law
of
physics,
which
is
if
your
application
becomes
more
complex.
You
need
to
follow
some
pattern
and
good
practices,
and
I
would
say
that
we
need
more
information
about
how
to
use
this
good
pattern
and
good
practices
in
the
poor
platform
in
general,
because
even
though
you
can
create
kleenex
application
quite
easily
at
some
point
you
need
some
kind
of
discipline
and
industry
proven
practice.
C
B
Basically,
so
we
would
just
say
that
that
it's
exactly
the
same
like
I
can
really
easily
write
an
app
press,
f5
and
it
works.
But
then
it's
different
thing
to
have
it
in
production,
where
you
need
to
have
logging
exception,
handling,
telemetry
and
so
forth,
and
so
on.
Would
you
say
these
are
the
things
that
could
have
been
done
more
easily
or
you
would
expect
to
get
from
us
to
tell
like
what
are
the
the
right
ways
of
doing
that
in
flow
and
power.
Apps.
C
Yeah,
I
would
expect
first
more
guidance,
more
documentation
about
good
practice.
If
you
want
to
do
this,
I
think
this
pattern
can
help
you,
and
this
is
all
we
would
implement
ourselves.
So
we
recommend
this
kind
of
implementation,
so
today
it
all
comes
from
the
community,
so
I
mean
some
customers,
don't
because
it's
not
really
for
microsoft,
so
it's
not
official.
So
there
are
some
thoughts,
so
we
need
to
spend
more
time
into
explaining
this
and
convincing
people
or
customers.
C
But
that's
one
thing.
The
other
thing
we
want
to
see
example,
so
we
want
to
see
real
implementation,
real
complex
implementation,
so
reference
implementation.
If
you
want
and
good
example,
I
think
that's
something
that
is
missing,
because
we
see
more
and
more
developers
and
people
create
a
lot
of
application,
quick
and
dirty
application
that
have
a
lot
of
security
holes.
B
C
A
There
are
certain
microsoft
and
but
it's
a
subset
of
people
yeah,
so
the
people
who
actually
write
to
power
platform
or
or
microsoft
teams,
platform
or
the
sharepoint,
the
one
try
platform
or
craft.
They
don't
actually
write
stuff
for
the
customers.
So
quite
often.
Actually
what
happens?
Is
that
there's
more
real
world
learnings
from
the
community,
because
they've
actually
control
exactly.
B
And-
and
I
guess
it's
like
with
everything
else
right
so
like
the
I-
I
love
the
dynamic
of
it
right
so
so
one
there.
There
is
this
side
of
how
things
are
intended
to
be
used
meant
to
be
used
and
then
the
reality
here
is
like
what
do
we
need
to
do
in
in
the
field?
And
then,
when
you
join
these
two,
then
you
have
a
real
pattern
like
seeking
the
balance
or
the
limits
of
what
is
meant
to
be
used
versus
what
what
we
actually
need.
C
B
A
On
coming
back
on
search
what
you
said
related
on
more
and
more
actual
developers
move
the
power
platform
as
well.
So
how
do
you
see
right
now,
at
least
there's
a
perception
that
the
power
platform
is
really
mainly
designed
designed
to
be
used
in
the
tenant
where
you
actually
built
those
applications,
so
you're
kind
of
you
don't
have
a
proper
ci
automation
and
deployment,
and
all
of
that
stuff?
Is
that
still
the
case
or
are
we
seeing
a
transition
on
other
side
because
correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong,
it's
more
like
in-house
development?
A
C
Yes,
it's
a
limiting
factor.
Well,
it
depends
so
technically
we
have
the
tool
for
deploying
the
application
from
one
tenant,
one
environment
from
dev,
test,
uet
and
production.
So
technically
we
have
that
these
tools
work
very
well
for
when
you
use
when
you
deal
with
the
cds,
but
not
when
you
deal
with
sharepoint
yeah,
because
when
you
deal
with
sharepoint
all
the
least
guit
list,
url
that
you.
C
Replaced
so
I,
by
the
way,
I
did
create
a
work,
a
flow
that
updates
that
for
you
so,
for
instance,
the
bpm
toolkit
have
51
flows
and
when
I
have
to
deploy
that,
because
I
use
trial
tenants
all
the
time
to
get
a
lot
of
test
users
account
when
I
have
to
deploy
that
it
usually
took
me
at
least
one
day
wow.
Now
it
take
me
20
minutes
by
using
this
tool,
but
still
it's
a
custom
tool.
It's
not
for
microsoft
right.
So
that's
something
that
will
be
shared.
A
C
A
C
So
we
see
that
more
and
more,
but
one
of
the
blocking
factor
is
indeed
the
problem
with
sharepoint.
So
for
the
sharepoint
application.
That's
an
issue
for
the
cds,
that's
fine!
So
it
all
depends
on
the
audience.
It
all
depends
that
actually
two
communities
in
the
platform,
the
dynamics,
one
and
let's
say
the
sharepoint
one.
I
mean
that's
two
different
communities
that
actually
are
merging
more
and
more
so
they're
getting
closer
and
closer
right,
so,
but
still
that
two
different
type
of
customers,
the
office
e5
customer
and
the
dynamic
customers.
C
A
So
what
about
actually
on
on
that
topic-
and
I
will
need
to
get
the
articles
in
a
second
because
you
don't
want
to
go
overboard,
but
what
about
then
store?
Do
we
have
a
store
option
for
the
power
platform?
We
have
that
for
power,
automate
correction.
If
I'm
wrong,
you
can
actually
buy
a
connectors.
What
about
power
power
power
apps
can.
Can
I
develop
a
power
app
and
install
that
from
the
store.
C
B
I
guess
there
are
two
sides
right
because
you
still
have
templates
right.
So
there
is
the
connector
and
template
and
you
could
say
that
the
connector
for
you
to
be
able
to
use
the
connector.
So
you
you
can
have
the
whole
app
for
free,
but
in
a
but
in
order
to
be
able
to
use
the
connector.
That
requires
a
license
which
you
need
to
purchase
with
a
vendor
off.
C
C
A
C
B
So
evan
worked
on
a
product
in
the
past.
There
is
also
the
thing
like
you
don't
want
to
wait
on
somebody
else.
You
don't
want
to
take
dependency
on
our
think
things
because
that
blocks
you.
So
you
want
to
move
absolutely
what
if
somebody
else
would
change
their
mind
or
they
changed
priority
and
you
decided
to
wait
on
them.
Well,
you
don't
have
nothing.
So
it's
a
heart
really
hard
thing
to
balance,
it's
not
as
simple
as
that.
You
know
what
one
microsoft,
how
about
we
get?
We
get
all
of
us
a
table.
A
C
A
This
is
basically
now
the
meeting
apps,
so
you
can
actually
during
before
and
during
and
after
the
meeting,
you
can
actually
collaborate
inside
of
the
team,
microsoft
teams
with
this
application,
so
it
could
be
the
monday.com.
It
could
be
something
else
or
surveys
and
all
of
that
stuff.
A
really
big
bet
for
sure
new
teams
find
you
on
design
kits
coming,
so
basically
the
science
and
the
usability
there
is
a.
A
How
would
I
put
this
in
a
in
a
not
confusing
way,
there's
actually
interesting
enough,
there's
even
github
repos,
which
have
controls,
but
we
haven't.
We
have
which
people
would
be
able
to
use,
but
we
haven't
actually
done
a
proper
job
of
explaining
where
the
controls
are.
So.
I
was
in
a
few
meetings
last
week
and
and
we
had
an
interesting
discussion
where
people
are
like
hey,
we
have
all
of
the
stuff
in
github
and
then
you
go
to
github,
you
go
to
the
repo
and
it
doesn't
even
say
what's
inside
of
the
repo.
A
This
is
design
design
kit,
but
yes,
there
are
controls
which
are
intended
to
be
used
in
the
in
a
teamstamp
as
a
layout
as
an
example,
a
dashboard
control
and
a
all
of
that
stuff.
So
there's
reusable
controls
not
related
on
displaying,
but,
and
it
is
an
area
where
we
are
actively
investing
together
with
fluent
fluent
ui
team,
so
not
just
design
kits
but
also
controls,
microsoft
teams
toolkit
updates
on
that
one.
I
think
the
latest
update
will
come
out
this
week
unless
I'm
completely
mistaken.
A
So
there's
new
updates
on
that
one
sharepoint
framework
is
evolving
as
well,
so
you
can
target
on
microsoft
teams
or
in
the
sharepoint
framework
side
craft
apis
on
all
that
stuff.
So
a
lot
of,
let's
say
improvements
on
this
area
now.
The
other
thing
which
went
live
yesterday
last
week
is
low
code,
apps
and
bots
in
microsoft,
teams
with
powerapps
and
power
virtual
agents.
A
So
we
didn't
talk
about
power,
virtual
agents
in
the
thing,
but
but
basically
the
power
platform
is
a
first
party
citizen,
it's
a
first
level
citizen
of
implementing
extensibility
for
microsoft
teams.
So
so
they
really
have
a
nice
integration,
and
I
was
testing
some
of
this
stuff
last
week
as
well,
and
the
power
virtual
virtual
eight-inch
agents.
It's
super
powerful,
it's
just
really
really
powerful
and
how
easy
it
is
to
actually
build
bots
and
all
of
that
stuff.
So
really
cool
good
recap
on
those
things
as
well.
A
A
What
else
microsoft
teams
app
development
challenge
was
announced
week
ago
monday
as
well,
and
there
is
a
prices,
prices,
prices,
prices
up
to
70,
45
45
000
in
cash.
So
well
that's
a
lot
of
money
actually
from
november
16
to
february
8th.
So
if
anybody
has
good
ideas,
please
sign
up
and
build
a
cool
thing
and
then
expose
as
part
of
the
program
really
cool
stuff
and
a
few
deprecation
notices
really
important
things.
So
deprecation
of
outlook
rest
apis.
It
is
going
to
be
deprecated
by
november
10th,
so
12
months,
deprecation
notice.
A
A
Wow,
that's.
That
is
a
good
good
notice,
because
then
there's
a
deprecation
of
microsoft,
craft
notification,
apis
also
february
1st
2021.
So
that's
pretty
soon,
and
that's
a
good
thing
to
be
aware
of
as
well
now
manage
microsoft,
dataverse
in
teams
environments.
Can
you
search
explain
what
is
a
microsoft
dataverse.
C
Yes,
actually
I
haven't,
I
haven't
been
through
this
article,
but
I
think
now
we
have
all
the
tools
we
need
to
manage
the
environment
that
we
create
in
teams.
So
when
people
create
an
application
in
teams
with
a
power
platform,
they
get
an
environment
et
cetera,
so
this
need
to
be
managed.
So
we
need
to
authorize
people
to
create
application
and
then
environment.
We
need
to
put
some
dlp
rules.
We
need
to
put
some.
C
We
need
to
be
able
to
manage
capacity
because,
as
you
know,
it's
the
database
behind
is
cds,
so
it's
free,
but
there's
a
limitation
of.
I
think
it's
2g.
I
think
so
people
need
to
be
able
to
manage
that.
So
that's
something
that
no
we
have
apparently,
so
I
haven't
used
that
yet
so
these
last
tools,
but
that's
very
important-
that's
something
that
the
community
was
asking
for.
Yes,.
A
B
Is
this
all
about
so
on
december
16,
my
team
is
going
to
organize
a
two-hour
live
stream
event
around
building
apps
for
teams.
So
you
will
go
from
zero
to
100
about
what
what
teams
apps
are.
Why
would
you
care
how
to
start
and
then
I'll,
as
as
we
go
along,
you
will
learn
how
these
things
work.
We
will
code
together
with
you
with
other
folks
online,
so
it
will
be
a
fun
event
by
developers
for
devs.
So
I
really
would
like
to
invite
everybody
to
join
us.
Yeah,
there's
a
small.
A
A
B
Well,
so,
as
we
learned
as
we
learned,
the
under
is
blur
right,
so
it's
like,
I
think
it's
it's
always
good,
to
learn
like
what's
possible
and
then
like
find
whether
whether
you're
comfortable
doing
that
or
whether
that's
going
too
far
right
because,
like
like
in
the
past,
we
had
these
like
gates
where
you
say
like
I
am
a
dev.
I
am
horadev,
but
with
all
these
tools,
like
you
say,
okay,
so
if
you
build
power
up
like
formulas
you
you
have
it,
there
can
be
pretty
big
right.
B
So
is
that
being
a
dev
like
I've
seen
people
build
like
full
games
with
physics
in
power
apps
like
I
would
never
be
able
to
do
that
so
power
ups
are
actually
for
devs
because,
like
you
can
do
like
really
powerful
things
in
there
right.
So
with
that,
I
think
that
there's
the
whole
thing
like:
where
do
you
draw
the
line
so
with
this
we
want
to
like
really
start
at
the
beginning
and
just
show
like
what
these
apps
are
and
decide,
and
let
you
choose
whether
that's
something
you
want
to
try.
A
What
was
this
one?
Locate
your
loved
ones
and
build
better
driving
habits
for
microsoft,
safety,
so
new
apps
and
features
microsoft,
individuals
and
family.
This
fall
so
basically
free
edition
of
microsoft
teams
was
mentioned
here
as
well,
and
then
the
microsoft
family
safety.
So
you
can
actually
follow
up
on
what's
happening
and
having
that
control
money,
where's,
the
microsoft
teams,
sync
there
easily
share
photos.
This
is
actually
pretty
cool
as
well
from
okay
focus
on
conversation.
Instead
of
your
notes,
surveying
quests
microsoft
forms
a
lot
a
lot
of
stuff.
A
Actually
this
wasn't
the
microsoft
teams
team's
announcement.
What
I
thought
that
it
was
that
one,
but
there's
a
microsoft
teams,
free
microsoft,
themes,
option
as
well,
but
this
is
a
good
set
of
basically
controls
for
the
family
and
tools
which
are
free
for
the
most
of
it,
at
least
so,
really
cool
stuff
as
well
now
bill.
There
had
a
good
article
from
elastic.
What
is
microsoft,
search
so
really
explaining?
What
is
the
microsoft
search?
What
does
it
actually
do
and
it's
actually
great
to
see
and
that
it's
actually
being
everything
inside
of
microsoft?
A
B
A
B
A
To
blur
and
background
and
microsoft
themes
and
all
that
stuff
really
cool
videos
as
well
and
relatively
new
set
of
videos,
but
this
what's
really
nice
about
this-
is
that
these
are
super
short
which
is
easily
consumable.
So,
whenever
you're
looking
to
do
explicit
of
one
thing,
you'll
just
find
it
and
good
to
go
and
move
forward
and
then
search
your
youtube
channel.
There's
a
video
related
on
power
platform,
bmd
and
bbm
toolkit
is.
There
is
something
else
which
will
explain
what
this
is
and
what
is
it
all
about.
A
Up
slightly,
so
that's
good,
a
few
new
samples
in
the
github
as
well,
so
this
is
from
sure
mendes.
Yes,
really
really
he's
always
building
super
super
clean
stuff.
So
basically
that's
the
pages
and
our
files,
and
then
in
here
it's
a
navigation
which
is
basically
based
on
the
file
structure,
so
you're
kind
of
a
based
on
metadata
building,
a
navigation
which
is
listing
the
files
on
the
thing
and
the
implementation
is
super
super
clean
with
a
background
image
and
and
the
background
style
support.
A
A
Different
tool-
and
there
are
different
set
of
people
using
different,
tooling
again
based
on
their
preference,
and
this
is
really
around
the
cdci
for
setting
up
automated
builds
for
that
tool.
Now,
stefan
had
a
awesome.
He
continues
on
writing
stories
related
on
the
web
parts,
including
microsoft
teams
tabs
when
you're
building
spfx,
so
how
the
section
backgrounds
and
theming
actually
works
and
how
to
take
advantage
of
that
one
and
how
you
should
be
implementing
this.
This
is
super.
A
Super
cool
stuff
also
takes
into
account
the
microsoft
teams
experience
so
teams
that
team's
teaming
this
one
is
from
kevin,
ritchie,
microsoft,
craft
first
steps
good
article
as
well.
We
always
tend
to
go
deep
dive,
400
levels,
technical
nuances,
but
actually
end
users
exactly
actually
end.
Users
always
want
to
have
100
level
getting
started
and
then
learning
from
there
and
there's
always
more
people
who
are
getting
started
rather
than
those
who
are
really
really
deep
on
the
on
the
technology.
So
really
getting
started
on
basics.
And
how
do
I
do
it?
A
C
A
Yeah
yeah,
absolutely
absolutely
as
well
and
walking
through
those
steps
and
a
video
as
well,
and
then
we
from
the
recording
alex
had
a
how
much
security
is
enough
security.
Looking
at
microsoft,
365
defenders
as
you're
sending
an
interesting
discussion
as
well
for
sure
how
much
do
you
wanna?
Well,
what
is
the
good
good
enough
security,
the.
A
Exactly
exactly
and
then
a
a
good
kind
of
a
summary
on
different
assets
and
resources
available
from
cameron,
five
ways
to
stay
up
to
date
with
microsoft,
resistor,
developer
news
and
calling
out
the
broadcasts,
websites
and
then
community
call
recordings
and
all
and
the
youtube
channel
center.
So
super
nice
set
of
assets
which
are
available,
but
now
search,
let's
jump
on
your
screen.
You
had
something
for
the
show
as
well.
C
C
Okay,
I'm
fine,
so
the
idea
was
the
following.
So
when
you
have
to
deal
with
approval
so
because
approval
is
the
the
tip
of
the
iceberg,
when
you
deal
with
approval,
creating
a
simple
approval
with
power.
Automate
is
quite
easy
right.
So,
but
sometime
if
you
have
to
ask
several
people
to
approve,
then
new
problem
pop
up,
because
what
happened?
If
the
first
person
doesn't
answer
what
happened
if
the
person
is
in
early
days
or
can
he
redirect
the
task
etc,
etc?
C
So
how
can
we
make
sure
that
the
data
that
you
want
to
approve
is
secure?
So
basically
you
are
getting
into
the
bpm
territory.
You
might
not
be
aware
of
that,
but
there
are
some
a
lot
of
traps
behind
approval,
so
you
have
approval,
you
have
reviewing
etc
and
in
the
platform,
so
especially
in
power
automate.
There
are
many
many
limitations,
so
instance
the
approval,
so
the
workflow,
which
is
listening
for
someone
to
approve,
stopped
after
30
days.
You
cannot
get
backwards,
you
cannot
go
sub
wood,
etc.
You
don't
have
state
machine.
C
So
after
several
years
of
struggling
with
complex
approval
and
reviewing,
I
decided
to
create
my
own
stuff
and
that's
basically
what
the
bpm
toolkit
is.
So
it's
a
free
thing
that
I
will
share
in
github
at
the
end
of
this
month
and
maybe
beginning
of
december,
and
the
idea
is
this:
so
it's
must
be
100.
Written
with
the
platform
must
be
free,
of
course,
because
it's
going
to
be
in
github.
C
Business
should
be
able
to
create
their
own
workflow.
They
don't
have
to
write
code.
They
should
be
able
to
get
somewhere
in
the
sharepoint
piece
and
create
the
workflow,
and
then
something
will
happen.
We
need
state
machine,
so
people
will
need
to
be
able
to
go
back
forward
and
backward
across
the
business
process.
C
If
you
want
to
change
the
workflow,
even
though
the
business
process
already
started,
you
must
be
able
to
do
that.
There's
no
duration
limit
in
the
workflow.
We
have
a
one
in
for
automate.
People
must
be
able
to
delegate
a
task
to
someone
else.
We
must
be
able
to
create
custom
task
form.
So
when
people
click
on
a
task,
they
should
be
able
to
have
different
kind
of
layout.
C
C
A
C
Basically,
there
is
a
name,
it's
bpm,
so
so
let's
say
someone
create
a
form
example
an
hr
request:
they
store
the
form
somewhere
and
then
the
business
process
starts
and
at
the
end,
what
people
want
to
be
able
to
do
is
they
want
to
see
the
whole
business
process?
They
want
to
see
something
like
this.
C
You
see,
so
we
can
see
that
hey
the
requests
start
here.
You
see
it's
orange
and
then
the
next
step
will
be
this
guy
or
this
team,
this
guy
or
this
team
etc.
So
we
must
be
able
to
follow
the
complex
business
process.
We
must
be
able
to
get
more
additional
information
about
the
business
process
itself.
We
must
be
able
to
to
secure
the
old
line,
because
behind
this
you
can
have
10
persons
who
need
to
be
able
to
approve.
C
C
C
You
see
which
in
complex
business
process
is,
is
an
issue,
so
I've
put
that
in
the
platform
I've
put
that
in
a
generic
platform
which
ran
in
this
this
this
version
on
top
of
sharepoint,
which
means
that
basically,
you
don't
have
to
buy
any
premium
license,
because
it's
part
of
sharepoint,
you
see
so
you
see
now
just
the
workflow
is
waiting
on
this
step.
Yeah
so
and
so
all
the
state
machine
task
management
review
pipeline
security
management
is
part
of
the
platform.
C
Now
I
show
that
I've
shown
that
to
to
the
power
automate
team-
and
they
were
very
enthusiastic
about
this,
and
one
of
the
first
remark
was:
how
can
you
integrate
that
with
robotic
process?
So,
if
you
know
robotic
process
is
the
process
where
a
back-end
service
can
call
an
application
running
on
a
desktop,
and
why
do
we
want
to
do
that?
C
C
C
C
C
C
That's
the
step
you
see
here
see
so
we
have
defined
an
architecture
which
is
very
generic.
On
top
of
that-
and
there
is
a
nice
pattern
behind
this-
which
is
the
what
we
call
a
case-
management
pattern
and
thing
of
this
pattern-
we
have
all
the
things
that
we
need
for
managing
business
process,
state
machine
approval,
lpr,
robotic
everything,
so
it's
a
covet
19
by
product,
because
I
started
working
on
it.
A
A
A
So
I
think
everybody
is,
is,
I
think
it's
actually
a
great
way
of
handling
in
the
microsoft
level
that
they're
encouraging
people
to
take
this
week
off
in
redmond
because
and
prioritizing
family
and
then
having
a
slow
december
and
then
time
off
again
in
holiday,
so
that
whenever
we
hopefully
get
back
in
full
steam
business
in
january
february
time
frame,
everybody
is
not
like
I'm
so
tired
brother,
like
yes,
I'm
willing
to
jump
in
and
now
I'm
ready
to
execute.
So
that's
the
mentality.
B
It
is-
and
I
guess
like
at
this
point
it's
more
than
just
a
pet
project
right.
So
currently
we
have
six
maintainers.
I
think,
there's
a
team
of
50,
odd
folks
who
help
us,
so
it's
more
than
that.
It's
it's
grew
out
of
proportions
already
a
while
back.
Like
I
recall
when
originally
like
it
would
start,
it
would
suck
exactly
as
that
as
a
pet
project,
with.