►
From YouTube: Montgomery City Planning Commission (2/22/18)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Development
plans
require
a
public
hearing,
however,
not
having
no
action
will
be
taken
by
the
Planning
Commission
members
flats,
rezoning,
revised
master
plans
and
and
street
rename
ins
require
public
hearing,
and
once
the
public
hearing
is
completed,
the
Planning
Commission
members
will
debate
deliberate
and
render
their
decision
the
Planning
Commission
members
with
their
personal
or
financial
interest
in
any
petitioners
request,
are
required
to
recuse
themselves.
We
have
on
the
Planning.
A
Commission
is
keep
you
tape
is
screws,
re
is
clay,
McKenna's,
Patrick,
moss,
Jerome,
mower,
Frank
cook
and
Clements
James,
Reed
and
Buddy
Hartley
members
and
petitioners
are
requested
to
please
speak
directly
into
the
microphone.
The
minutes
are
being
reported
for
legal
purposes,
and
this
is
the
only
way
to
accurately
pick
pick
up
the
audio.
Since
tonight
we
had
seven
members
and
takes
five
votes
to
pass
a
motion
because
of
that.
If,
for
any
reason,
because
of
the
number
of
do,
we
have
present
tonight
like
to
delay
your
request,
please
let
us
know:
okay,.
B
C
D
A
A
Y'all
we
are
going
to
rather
than
go
to
the
first
item.
We
had
a
plan
that
was
approved
last
last
month
and
since
that
period
of
time
there's
been
discussion
of
trying
to
do
a
resent
to
rescind
that
that
plan
we
had
spent
most
of
the
day
talking
back
and
forth,
with
with
whis
Pruitt
with
the
owner
with
other
members
of
the
some
of
the
members.
One
of
the
members
it's
not
here,
and
we
feel
like
that.
There
has
been
a
an
effort
on
all
parties
to
try
to
work.
This
work
this
out.
A
The
approval
of
the
plat
is
a
plant
that
would
allow
72-foot
Lots
to
be
developed
in
entitled
lake
under
under
the
under
the
next
platen
effect.
That's
being
done
out
there.
There
was
a
some
objection
and
there
was
some
conversation
with
some
of
the
some
of
the
homeowners
who
had
passed
this
through
I
think
Glen
and
Glen
brought
that
to
to
our
attention
in
an
effort
to
try
to
solve
and
work
this
out.
We
have
spent
pretty
good
bit
of
time
talking
back
with
with
mr.
A
Tatum
and
at
this
point,
I
don't
know
where
y'all
are,
but
I
will
announce
to
you
that
mr.
Tatum
has
agreed
that
he
will.
He
would
rescind
his
his
approval
of
the
72
foot
plan,
subject
to
their
not
being
the
delay
in
his
moving
forward
under
what
he
already
has
the
right
to
do,
which
is
to
develop
80
to
85
foot
Lots.
A
So
what
he
is
that
I
don't
know
any
other
way
to
to
resolve
it
other
than
allow
the
man
to
do
what
he
says
he's
going
to
do.
I
have
from
him.
He
was
out
of
out
of
the
state
today
and
I
have
an
email
that
I'm
all
read
to
you
right
right,
quick
and
this
was
going
through
Jerome
more
today,
and
it
says
Jerome
pursuant
to
our
conversation,
I'll
be
willing
to
rescind
my
request
for
72
foot,
wide
lights
and
bill
80-foot
lights.
A
If
we
can
move
this
far,
this
project
forward
without
any
other
delay,
so
he
is
willing
to
do
that.
And
anyone
hear
this.
We
don't
have
to
do
a
public
hearing
or
anything
on
it,
but
I
do
want
to
be
able
to
allow
somebody
to
have
comments
on
this,
but
this
is
but
weird,
but
we
he
has
agreed
to
do
what
he
has
the
right
to
do
so.
A
It's
it's
got
to
be
subject
to
the
city
has
got
to
receive
the
plat
and
from
mr.
Tatem
that
will
they
will
be
submitted
for
the
March
Planning
Commission
meeting,
which
would
be
the
80-foot
lot
plat
and
in
doing
so
he's
he's
being
put
on
notice.
That
he's
got
to
had
it
to
the
Planning
Commission
by
the
excuse
me,
the
planning
staff
by
March,
the
first
I,
think
it's
the
date
that
he
understood
or
it's
y'all
had
a
pedigree
to.
So
what
he's
going
to
do?
A
He,
as
a
matter
of
fact,
I
talked
to
him
from
here
just
right
before
this
meeting
to
make
sure
he
understood
that
what
I
was
gonna
be
telling
telling
him
to
telling
the
homeowners
and
he
he
agrees.
He
said
he
will
have
that
plan.
He
says
they're
working
on
the
plan
right
now
and
he
will
have
an
80-foot
light.
Plat
that
will
be
presented
to
the
Planning
Commission
next
month
at
the
Planning
Commission
me
now.
A
D
B
B
B
A
B
My
address
is
5,500
Hollister
Drive,
Montgomery
Alabama,
three,
six,
one,
one,
six,
the
information
that
was
shared
today,
we
have
representatives
from
Taylor
Lakes
here
today
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
the
compromise
to
build
80
feet
Lots
instead
of
the
original
proposal,
is
a
compromise
and
I
don't
want
to
speak
on
behalf
of
all
of
the
residents.
If
there's
anyone
that
is
present,
that
has
an
objection
to
the
proposal.
The
revised
proposal
I
would
like
them
to
recognize
recognize
them
at
this
time
to
ensure
that
everyone
present
is
in
agreement
and.
A
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
E
F
Good
evening,
mr.
chairman,
my
name
is
Richard
baller
John,
with
Jay
and
Garrett
son
engineers
and
surveyors
and
I'm
here,
representing
ma,
P
hospitality
and
I'd
like
to
just
give
you
a
quick
little
handout.
So
you
see
how
this
fits
together,
what
they're
actually
doing
other
they
hadn't
buy
some
additional
property
from
the
church
in
order
to
satisfy
some
things
for
JPMorgan
for
an
entrance
and
exit
out
onto
the
highway.
F
A
Any
any
comment,
any
questions
anybody
wish
to
speak
for
against
it,
if
not,
emotions
in
order.
F
A
F
Have
to
look
my
folder,
but
from
my
memory
I
did
the
elevation
certificate
first
and
I
believe
the
flood
zone
is
going
to
be
about
six
feet
above
the
existing
grade
and
then
with
the
two-foot
freeboard
about
eight
feet.
So.
F
Their
plan,
as
I've
been
told
the
you
know
changing
here
and
there,
but
it's
to
do
like
one
of
the
Florida
homes
where
it's
like
up
on
stilts-
and
this
is
a
small
cabin
for
Miss
race
son.
She
has
no
interest
in
selling
the
property.
In
fact,
you
know
she's
doing
this
to
accommodate.
You
know,
city
requirements.
Yes,
so
it's
a
just
going
to
be
a
small
cabin
he's
going
to
pull
this
pick
up
little
four-wheeler
up
under
there
and
like
one
of
these
Florida
homes
near
the
coast,
all.
A
B
C
A
H
Name
is
Elizabeth
Brazelton,
with
Goodwin
mills
and
Cawood
I'm,
here
present
of
on
behalf
of
Montgomery
Chamber
of
Commerce,
presenting
Business
Resource
Center
a
flat
number
to
this
law.
It
has
three
hundred
and
sixteen
feet
frontage
or
around
South
Court
Street
for
19
from
Wilson
Street.
It's
basically
the
the
block
right.
There
is
all
owned
by
Montgomery
Chamber,
and
this
will
create
two
larger
Lots
for
them.
H
H
H
B
B
B
G
Good
afternoon,
I'm
Daryl
Strickland,
with
Google,
Mills
and
K,
would
requesting
hearing
on
the
development
plan
for
this
building
over
in
the
H&R
Point
area
is
the
10,500
square
foot
building
for
a
contractor
the
north
part
of
its
going
to
be
used
as
an
office
center
part
as
a
warehouse
and
the
south
part,
is
a
shed
for
storage,
be
glad
to
answer
any
questions
that
you'd
like
to
have.
We've
addressed
all
the
city:
companies,
okay,.
D
D
G
You
see,
cross-hatched
is,
will
be
just
a
concrete,
paving
that
allow
truck
turnarounds
to
go
in
and
back
up
into
the
warehouse
area.
You
can't
really
see
it
on
that,
drawing,
but
there's
a
fence
that
runs
north
and
south.
Just
to
the
looking
at
this
drawing
just
at
the
right
side
of
that
cross-hatched
area.
It
appears
that
that
should
be
the
right
of
way.
But
it's
not
that's.
G
D
D
B
G
B
G
A
H
Requesting
approval,
this
is
a
de
Ville
development
plan
and
there's
it's
like
a
fast-food
building
and
then
there's
going
to
be
two
entranceways
ones
off
the
service
lane
of
Eastern
Boulevard
and
the
other
one
is
from
the
adjoining
property
owner.
Burger
King.
There's
access
Drive
to
enter
through
that
way
and
there
will
be
a
driver.
A
C
C
E
Students
speaks
with
Larry,
speaks
and
associates
representing
cook
foods
on
this
sites
located
off
the
western
boulevard
back
on
a
couple
years
ago,
they
made
a
major
expansion
under
this
plant
spent
several
million
dollars.
I,
don't
know
if
y'all,
driven
by
and
seen
it,
but
they've
got
a
lot
of
it
complete
by
now,
they've
come
back
and
got
to
to
smaller
little
additions.
I
say
little
on
there
about
6,000
feet
total,
but
two
smaller
additions.
E
A
E
This
location
is
its
capital
RV
park.
There's
an
existing
RV
park
there.
Now
the
interstate,
the
intersection
of
231
and
old.
We
come
just
off
this
page
to
the
north.
The
RV
park
sits
on
the
west
side
of
old
Wetumpka
highway.
Now
it's
operational,
it's
been
in
operation
for
several
years,
there's
some
property
to
the
south.
It
will
connect
to
the
RV
park.
The
purpose
in
the
rezoning
to
be
to
is
to
rezone
this
property
to
the
south
for
the
expansion
of
the
RV
park
to
the
south.
E
E
E
A
piece
right
here
that
actually
I
think
it's
already
rezone
Helen
I've
been
talking
about
this.
We're
trying
to
clean
it
up,
but
I
think
the
original
rezoning
came
to
here
and
there's
there's
RVs
parked
here
now
and
then
he
has.
He
does
have
some
more
of
these
parked
here
that
have
creeped
across
that
line.
That's
the
purpose
again,
the
1
hidden,
getting
it
all,
rezone
dand,
getting
it
approved
right
here
on
this.
That's
the
for
this!
This
pond
is
art,
is
existing
this
out
there.
D
E
The
ones
messed
up,
that's
that
line
I'm
telling
you
about
this
was
planted.
The
flat
line
comes
to
here.
This
was
all
planted.
There's
one
lot,
Helen
I
got
to
talking
and
she
said
we
need
to
clean.
We
need
to
clean
up
the
zoning
through
here.
The
line
is
not
defined
well,
so
we
decided
just
go
ahead
and
clued
all
that
in
the
rezoning
okay,
but
the
actual
plat
line
comes
to
here.
There's.
B
A
very
small
portion
on
the
east
property
line
right
a
budding,
the
old
way
tonka
highway,
they
didn't
get
resumed
and
he
owns
it
and
we
needed
that
Rees
owned.
There's
a
parcel
on
the
west
property
line.
That's
going
to
be
the
septic
system
that
doesn't
show
up
on
what
he's
showing
you
on
his
site
plan.
If
you
look
at
your
portion
on
the
north
part
of
the
Green
Line,
you
see
where
it
says.
B
B
B
D
B
E
B
A
E
A
C
The
ninth
item
was
withdrawn.
It
was
a
request
for
rezoning
at
Taylor
Road
at
Halcyon
Boulevard
and
it's
Kron
10th
items
bill
green
engineering
on
behalf
of
the
Montgomery
Housing
Authority,
requesting
final
approval
of
Columbus
square
flat
number
two
on
the
north
west
corner
of
North
Union
Street
and
Columbus
Street
SAT
for
our
smart
code.
Mr.
I
D
I
D
G
I
A
private
enterprise
that
will
develop
it
through
the
Housing
Authority
I,
don't
know
exactly
how
that
works.
Housing
Authority
owns
the
land
at
this
stage
the
land
hadn't
changed
hands,
but
it's
financed
through
the
Alabama
Housing
Finance
Authority.
So
the
developer
would
end
up
owning
it
and
paying
the
Housing
Authority
I
would
assume
I,
don't
know
exactly
how
that's
done.
G
G
D
Frank
I
can
speak
to
that
a
little
bit.
This
is
a
mixed
finance
situation
that
involves
a
developer
for
the
housing
authority.
The
city's
got
some
money
in
it,
that's
equity
in
it
from
different
entities.
D
G
A
I
A
B
C
B
B
Do
you
own
it
yeah?
Well,
my
uncle
owns
it,
but
we're
doing
the
paperwork
and
stuff
now
so
that
I
can
get
ownership
of
it,
but
he
submitted
the
document
with
the
beat
and
stuff
on
that
will
will
it
just
be
for
daycare
or
with
somebody
living
it
also
just
be
for
daycare?
No
one
lived,
you
know,
sir,
is.
B
A
B
G
D
Ma'am
but
from
a
land-use
perspective,
the
used
to
necessarily
fit
the
surrounding
areas.
You
got
single-family
homes
that
connect
to
your
property
and
have
a
commercial
establishment,
just
slap
down
in
the
middle
of
all,
that
kind
of
contrary
to
help,
at
least
in
my
mind,
the
property
ought
to
be
used.
So
that's
my
opinion,
but,
of
course,
my
brother's
up
here,
but
this
is
just
a
spot
zoning
situation
that
we
need
to
stay
away
from
the
be
frame.
How.
F
B
The
long-range
planners
opposed
to
spot
zoning
and
the
study
they
did
indicated
single-family
and,
like
you
said,
it's
dead
center.
The
residential.
G
Well,
this
area
needs
help,
I
can
making
houses
over
there
and
I
may
be
the
only
one
that
I've
got
how
I've
got
two
houses
and
a
half
a
block
of
there
that
are
rented
and
stayed
rented,
and
so
it
would
not
have
I
will
not
be
opposed
to
it.
If
you
come
and
I
realize
his
spot
zoning
but
I
realized
that
need
some
help
right.
There
yeah.
D
B
D
B
A
G
H
A
A
C
A
A
D
Buddy
before
we
conclude
tonight,
I
just
wanted
to
just
throw
a
philosophical
issue
on
the
table.
No
areas
like
this
need
help,
but
you
know
sometimes,
when
you
have
to
consider
these
decisions,
you
have
to
look
at
the
highest
and
best
use
of
the
property,
and
you
know
it
just
seems
to
me
if
you're
thinking
about
those
neighbors
that
are
still
there,
is
this
really
the
highest
viciously
properly
over
folks,
through
the
main
in
these.