►
From YouTube: Montgomery City Planning Commission (7/27/17)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Please
note
that
any
planning,
commission
member
with
a
personal
or
financial
interest
in
any
petitioners
request,
are
required
to
recuse
themselves.
I
would
like
to
take
this
opportunity
to
introduce
the
members
of
the
Planning
Commission.
We
have
Mr
bloody
Harvick.
Vice
chairman
and
Clemmons
right
cook
passed
across
crews,
Reed's
Pickett,
Reeves
and
James
Reid.
A
A
Members
and
petitions
are
requested
to
speak
dialect
leaked
into
the
microphone.
The
minutes
are
recorded
for
legal
purposes,
and
this
is
the
only
way
to
accurately
pick
up
audio
and
I
said
before
we
have
eight
members
here
tonight.
It
takes
five
votes
to
pass
a
motion,
so
just
know
that
if
you
get
five
votes
then
that
means
that
it
goes
in
your
favor
or
in
some
cases
it
may
not.
A
Are
there
any
changes
to
the
agenda.
Tonight
knows
no
changes
very
good.
Each
member
has
had
an
opportunity
to
review
the
minutes.
Are
there
any
changes
of
revisions
to
the
minutes
necessary
seeing
Leung?
Do
we
have
a
motion
to
accept
the
minutes?
No
careful
second
motions
been
laid
in
proper.
Second,
all
in
favor
motion
passes
are
the
met,
is
hard
subject:
okay,
mr.
Tyson,
every
read
yes,.
B
A
Okay,
members
of
Commission
any
questions
for
the
petitioner,
any
members
of
the
audience.
Mister
speak
for
or
just
desire,
keep
in
mind.
This
is
a
public
hearing
for
a
development
plan.
Therefore,
no
one
we
won't
be
taking
a
vote
tonight.
So
if
there's
no
opposition
from
the
public,
then
we'll
declare
fort
locators
been
held
and
we'll
move
on
to
the
next
item.
Good
luck
with
your
property!
All.
B
F
Gunther
Jeffcoat
from
Jeffcoat
engineers
and
surveyors
representing
mr.
Charlie
Bowen
property
is
a
square
acre
located
on
Sanders
Lane
and
Madison
Park
and
mr.
Saunders
lived
there
for
many
many
years
and
his
home
burned
the
wall
back
two
three
years
ago,
and
he
now
wants
to
rebuild
there
and
now
he's
got
big
planning
to
meet
city
requirements.
So
that's
where
we
are
today
and
would
like
your
consideration.
Accordingly.
Okay.
A
B
E
Evening
I'm
James
newberry,
with
Donaldson
Garrett
&
Associates.
We
are
requesting
final
approval
of
O'reilly
Auto
Parts
West
for
plat
number.
One.
A
similar
plant
was
actually
approved
by
the
Commission
I
believe
in
May,
right
afterwards,
approved
O'riley,
which
has
its
property
under
contract,
had
the
opportunity
to
purchase
60
additional
feed.
So
they
elected
to
do
so
so
we're
resubmitting
a
new
plan
with
the
additional
60
feet,
combined
with
it.
B
E
E
Answer
that
I'm
not
sure
I'm
just
curious
yes,
sir
I
wish
I
did
know,
but
I
don't
and
the
owners
not
here,
but
I
would
think
it
would
be
open
to
anyone
but
I'm,
not
sure.
A
E
A
B
I
I
There
were
sketches
that
were
sent
out
I,
believe
they
all
showing
the
potential
use
of
these
Lots
of
the
sizes
they're.
Actually,
fifty
foot
or
larger
throughout
this
twelve
and
a
half
acres
had
an
opportunity
to
call
Shirley
Shirley
rolling
over
at
Sturbridge
homeowners
association.
She
put
me
in
touch
with
mark
fain
of
alpha
and
with
Kevin
Keesler
of
Alpher,
to
talk
to
them
a
little
bit
about
what
we
were
doing.
They
said
they
they
had
similar
developments.
They
would
not
oppose
us
that
in
their
future
developments
they
had
about
600
acres.
I
That
would
be
surrounding
this
whole
development
here
that
they
would
probably
have
some
of
these
in
their
development
as
well.
I
took
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
the
city,
councilman
Glenn
Pruett
in
that
district,
to
see
if
he
had
any
objections,
or
he
had
heard
of
any
objections-
and
he
told
me
that
at
this
time
he
he
was
for
this.
This
development
be
glad
to
answer
any
questions.
If
you
have
any
Commissioner.
A
J
J
Allow
me
to
start
with
the
fact
that
this
is
the
third
time
I
have
been
downtown
to
attend
a
Planning
Commission
meeting
unreasoning
this
specific
piece
of
property
and
although
I
was
notified
by
the
Planning
Commission
about
the
rezoning,
neither
the
property
owner
nor
the
engineer
have
contacted
me
to
discuss
their
plan
for
this
property.
So
it's
nice
that
he
talked
to
Glenn
and
mark,
but
he
didn't
bother
to
call
the
neighbor.
The
two
main
things
I
have
I
see
changed
on
this
proposal
since
the
last
two
times.
J
Two
similar
proposals
failed
is
that
the
property
has
a
new
owner
and
a
new
engineer,
to
my
knowledge,
the
main
obstacles
that
prevented
similar
patio
home
patio
home
projects
in
the
past
from
moving
forward
still
exist.
I
see
from
the
agenda
that
my
neighbor
wants
to
put
63
homes
on
it,
plus
a
clubhouse.
The
previous
owner
tried
to
fit
72
with
no
clubhouse
I.
Believe
it
was
mr.
Upchurch
who
pointed
out
the
obvious,
which
was
that
it
wasn't
feasible
to
think
72
homeowners,
their
family
members
and
cars,
along
with
city
service
vehicles
and
emergency
vehicles.
J
We're
going
to
share
a
one
lane
dirt
road
way,
which
is
what
Taylor
Road
East
is,
and
it
is
my
private
property
owned
and
maintained
by
myself
and
my
husband.
The
garbage
trucks
don't
even
come
down
to
the
road
east
I
have
to
drive
my
garbage
to
a
paved
road,
so
to
be
clear,
I
own,
the
road
I
will
not
dedicate
it
to
the
city
for
public
use.
I
will
not
make
changes
or
enhance
enhancements
in
the
road
to
allow
463
homeowners,
their
families,
their
cars
city
service
vehicles
and
emergency
vehicles.
J
To
use
my
single
main
dirt-road
beyond
that.
In
this
plan
I
see
nothing
that
addresses
drainage,
so
I
assume
the
worst
and
that
the
new
lots
will
be
graded
graded
to
flood
my
front
yard
or
my
side
yard
arm
of
the
yards
of
my
Sturbridge
neighbors,
because
the
drain
pipes
go
under
Taylor,
Road,
East
and
I'm.
Not
digging
them
up.
J
I
also
see
that
I
get
to
stand
on
my
front
porch
and
look
at
about
a
dozen
back
doors
and
backyards
I
doubt
that
anyone
in
this
room
stands
on
their
front
porch
and
looked
at
their
neighbors
back
doors
and
backyards.
This
plan
obviously
shows
complete
disregard
for
my
neighboring,
home
and
property,
and
yesterday
after
I
met
with
my
real
estate
attorney,
mr.
Bollinger
was
notified
that
this
property
has
restrictive
covenants
in
place
that
do
not
permit
proposed
site
layout.
J
So
to
recap
neither
the
property
owner
nor
the
engineer
group
has
made
contact
with
me
to
discuss
this
plan.
I
have
no
intention
at
this
time
to
give
anyone
permission
to
use
my
one
lane
dirt
road
which
will
be
required
to
bring
about
the
plans
presented
here
today
and
lastly,
I
do
not
want
to
appear
as
someone
who
is
against
development.
J
A
J
A
number
of
them
I
noticed
they
deal
with
minimum
square
footage.
They
deal
with
distance
between
properties.
I
gave
Mom
a
real
estate
attorney
list
element
and
he
was
directed
to
deal
with
the
property
owners
real
estate
attorney,
but
that
was
yesterday
because
I
just
saw
the
plan
Wednesday.
Okay,
what
and
it
was
not
from
mr.
ballinger's
office
I-
do.
A
J
J
You
know
having
trucks
come
in
and
out,
build
whatever,
and
all
the
all
the
drainage
on
that
property
drains
to
the
east,
and
all
of
that
goes
under
my
driveway
I
have
multiple
drain
pipes
under
there,
which
meant
mr.
Campbell
knows
about,
because
he's
been
out
there
and
worked
with
me
on
it
when
he
was
working
with
Alfa,
okay,.
J
F
K
K
I
A
Mr.
Harley,
if
you
don't
mind
I'd
like
to
hear
the
second
group,
but
they
will
always
get
back
to
the
petition,
so
there's
two
other
gentlemen
who
would
like
to
speak
you
before
against
this
item.
So
let's
hear
those
guys
and
Richard
you'll
have
the
chance
to
in
your
lawyer
to
have
a
chance
to
talk
about
this
when
they
are
done
good.
L
L
Lady
before
me,
exact
same
concerns:
there's
a
situation
wherein
I
cannot
in
good
conscience,
be
participatory
and
allowing
them
to
come
through
my
property
and
I.
Don't
know
about
Taylor
Road
East,
but
they're
talking
about
quiet
whatever,
whatever
that
name
of
that
street.
But
the
fact
of
the
matter
is:
is
that
I
own
that
14-acre.
L
L
L
But
but,
but
that
that
the
property
that
I
happen
to
own
and
I
have
no
intentions
of
participating
in
to
put
in
a
situation
like
that
unless
and
until
something
drastically
happening,
I
share
the
same
sentiment.
That's
my
neighbor.
We've
been
down
here
two
or
three
times
for
the
same
kind
of
off-the-record
kind
of
a
address
net
of
the
property,
and
it
is
it
is
the
property
is
where
it
is
and
it's
like
it
is,
and
if
somebody
wants
to
be
for
freight
and
fair,
then
maybe
something
could
happen.
A
F
F
M
G
L
E
A
A
K
J
J
F
I
You
mr.
chairman
I
sure
appreciate
the
opportunity
first,
when
you
have
on
when
you
have
a
highway
like
Taylor
Road,
that's
out
there
with
the
noise.
Your
natural
progression
for
a
buffer
zone
would
be
to
have
some
nice
offices
out
in
front
of
your
subdivision.
You
probably
go
back
from
there
to
patios
and
then
from
there,
maybe
into
a
state
or,
and
that's
how
you
set
up
your
PUD
typically,
because
no
one
really
wants
all
that
noise.
I
C
Secondly,
the
restrictive
covenants
amidst
a
long
sham,
prefers
to
have
been
revoked
years
ago,
just
like
the
same
covenants
were
on
the
property
that
dr.
mccorvey
owns.
We
revoked
those
covenants
prior
to
the
planning
of
his
office
park
and
where
the
Oaks
is
currently
located.
There
were
the
same,
restricted
covenants
on
each
of
about
five
owners
that
previously
owned
that
property
that
were
revoked
and
there
have
been
I
guess,
it's
probably
50
houses
in
the
Oaks
they've
been
multiple
sales
and
changes
of
hands
and
conveniences
of
property
and
I
suspect.
C
Title
policies
have
been
issued
on
each
and
every
one
of
those
properties
which
originally
had
the
same
covenants
on
lot
size
and
distances
from
roads
and
so
forth
that
were
long
since
removed
in
the
property,
the
subject
property,
those
covenants
have
been
removed,
they're
recorded
record
and
I'll
be
glad
to
provide
you
copies
of
the
recorded
revocations
was
done.
The
same
way,
the
exact
same
way.
The
revocation
was
done
on
the
property
that
dr.
mccorvey
owns
and
there
were
no
title
problems
related
to
that.
C
He
is
sold
at
least
one
or
more
of
those
properties
from
the
office
park.
There
were
no
title
related
problems
related
to
that.
My
client
has
a
title
policy
that
has
no
restrictions
with
regard
to
those
previous
restrictive
covenants
because
they
had
been
removed
and
I've
coordinated
with
several
title
insurance
companies
on
that.
So
the
issues
the
legal
issues-
she's
talking
about
don't
exist
any
longer
they're,
not
legal
issues,
there's
a
right
of
way
to
be
able
to
get
to
the
subject:
property,
ingress/egress,
utility,
easements
and
they're
there.
C
With
regard
to
properties.
The
Oaks
you've
got
yards
that
back
up
on
that
same
Taylor,
Road
East
right
now,
you've
got
Sturbridge
on
the
far
side
of
the
subject
property.
So
it's
all
been
subdivided
out.
You've
got
the
office
park
to
the
west
of
it
between
the
subject,
property
and
Taylor.
Road,
that's
been
there
for
nine
or
ten
years
now.
You've
got
the
Alpha
property,
which
is
to
the
west
and
to
the
south
or
south
east
of
the
subject.
Property
and
there's
been
an
indication
they're
going
to
develop
those
at
some
point.
M
C
J
A
C
K
C
Original
people
that
could
be
my
profession,
I
had
put
the
covenants
in
place
and
the
owners
at
the
time
the
revocations
took
place.
It
was
Judith
Huddleston
individually
and
as
executrix
of
her
late
husband's
estate
and
the
owners
at
that
time,
which
was
Hugh,
V
Smith,
the
third
who
owned
all
of
the
subject,
property
we're
talking
about
and
that's
what
it
took
to
revoke
it.
Just
like
the
same
revocations
were
done
earlier
on
dr.
C
McCoy
fees,
property
and
on
the
property
where
the
Oaks
is
located,
because
the
covenants
were
put
in
place
by
the
same
people.
A
Okay,
thank
you
for
for
this.
This
is
rather
unique.
We
going
to
let
the
other
side
speak
for
a
second,
because
she's
there
raising
her
hand
and
I
think
dr.
McCormick.
You
bought
your
eternity
too,
so
we're
not
going
to
turn
it
into
a
courtroom,
but
what
everybody
has
a
chance
to
talk
so
go
right
here.
I'll.
J
Be
brief,
I
did
not
realize
we
were
bringing
our
attorneys
or
I
would
have
brought
mine.
So
y'all
get
me
again.
Those
covenants
were
in
place
as
of
yesterday,
when
I
sat
down
with
my
real
estate
attorney
and
went
through
them.
One
covenant
expired
in
the
80s,
and
now
it's
between
Huddleston
and
the
Mandel's
Hugh
Smith
was
the
owner
aftermath
the
Mandel's.
So
he
is
partly
correct
that
particular
piece
of
property
that
12.5
acres
was
in
the
front
yard
of
the
Holliston.
J
J
A
I
Be
glad
to
ask
our
representatives
over
here,
if
they'd
like
to
do
that,
I
think
we
knew
that
mr.
long
temple
was
going
to
be
in
opposition
to
the
development.
To
start
with
my
first
time,
I
met
her
out
there.
She
was
telling
me
about
the
restrictions
on
the
property,
so
I
was
a
little
reserved
at
what
we
could
do
with
the
property
until
we
actually
looked
at
it
there
again.
I
What
we
see
I
think
out
here
is
the
driveway
from
the
doctor's
property
right
there
in
blue
is
about
a
hundred
foot
up
is
where
our
entrance
road
would
be
so
there's
a
short
piece
in
there.
That
I
think
we
would
like
to
use
since
it
supposedly
is
those
easements
go
along
with
the
property
that
you
I,
don't
know
if
she
purchased
it
or
how
she
got
it,
but
I
think
the
easements
go
along
with
the
property
and
the
right
to
use
it.
That's
that's
not
me.
I
That's
the
attorneys
to
look
at
her
attorney
did
write
me
a
letter.
Send
it
to
me.
I
sent
him
back
a
nice
note.
I
told
him
who
our
attorney
was
met.
Hers
is
Matt,
Ellis,
very,
very
good,
real
estate
attorney
and
and
I
think
you
know
in
them.
Talking
I,
don't
know
what
she
would
like
to
work
out
other
than
probably
not
to
develop
the
property.
I
So
I
think
let
me
ask
if
they
want
to
move
forward
for
a
vote,
but
there
again
I
think
the
progression
is
a
nice
office
park
in
front
of
you
kind
of
buffers
a
lot
of
the
noise
you
step
back
with
some
patio
homes.
This
was
a
schematic
sketch
right
here
that
we
did
it's
not
maybe
the
exact
layout.
Some
of
the
Lots
are
a
lot
larger
than
50
foot,
the
housings
that
they're
looking
at
putting
in
they're
larger
than
2,000
square
foot.
So
it's
it's
not
something.
I
A
N
I
I
I
A
I
F
A
I
A
I
I
Okay,
my
client
has
decided
that
we
probably
wouldn't
get
that
any
kind
of
negotiations
as
far
as
what
we
would
put
in
there.
What
they're
wanting
to
put
in
there
like
we
said
or
50,
foot
and
or
larger
Lots,
2,000
square
foot
or
larger
houses,
and
that's
what
what
they
would
like
to
put
in
there.
So
that's
what
we
asked
for
for
tonight
is
to
move
this
to
the
PGH
40,
knowing
that
on
record
we're
saying
we're
going
to
go
war,
50/50,
foot
wide
or
larger,
so.
K
You
know
I
guess
it
still
seems
some
legal
issues
that
we
haven't
I'm,
not
comfortable
with
it
I'm
sort
of
not
an
attorney,
but
it
does
seem
to
me
that
there
appears
to
be
some
difference
of
opinions
and
I
know.
I
know
a
legal
opinion
is
worth
the
paper
it's
written
on,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
sometimes
not
worth
that,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
y'all
have
a
situation
where
the
doctor
is
saying:
I,
don't
want
this
mr.
K
DeLong
chassis,
saying
I
own
that
road
and
I
don't
care
what
you're
telling
me
my
I'm
being
told,
but
that's
not
the
case
and
James
is
saying.
Yes,
that
is
the
case.
Hi
I'm,
just
telling
you
I,
think
y'all
got
some
issues
that
are
greater,
then
and
and
spending
some
time
deciding
who
is
right
and
who
is
wrong
and
it
may
not
ever
happen
because
you
had
three
long
and.
I
I
think
I
think
you're
right
with
the
legal
issues.
I
think
I've
seen
what
was
presented
to
me
for
my
benefit
and
and
I
think
before
it
could
be
developed
and
we
would
have
another
stage
to
go
through,
which
would
be
a
development
plan
stage
to
actually
come
down
and
work
it
out.
But
what
I'm
saying
right
now
is
yeah
I.
Think
those
two
different
before
anybody
could
build
anything
out
there.
Then
all
those
issues
would
have
to
be
satisfied.
Well,.
A
Let
me
make
it
clear
tonight
that
this
is
this
body
is
not
considered
into
believing
anything.
Our
work,
considering
is
the
fact
of
the
rezoning
hasn't
been
presented.
So
I
don't
want
us
to
get
entangled
with
these
legal
minds
because
I'm
sure
these
guys
are
good,
but
I
can't
fool
with
that
tonight.
We're
dealing
with
the
rezoning
request
and
come
if
I'm
looking
at
this
correctly,
it
says
land
use
plan
recommends
agricultural
use.
So
if
you
want
to
proceed
with
the
boat,
is
that
what
I
understand
you
say?
Richard,
that's.
A
M
M
F
B
A
H
H
H
You
know
I,
don't
know,
I
think
it's
outside
of
the
police
jurisdiction,
but
if
it's
outside
of
the
police
jurisdiction
well,
when
they
originally
brought
it
to
me,
I
thought
it
was
outside
of
the
city,
but
apparently
is
within
the
city
and
that's
why
I
asked
for
this
rezoning
request?
Okay,
we
do
have
city
services
out
there,
so
I
think.
Maybe
it's
in
some
of
it
is
the
summit,
but
this
particular
parcel
I
think
is
any
city
is.
H
K
O
A
H
H
K
H
H
E
H
L
H
A
A
H
A
K
Wilson,
you
be
Gribble
to
have
this
property
cubed,
which
means
qualified,
which
means,
if
you
won't
put
anything
more
than
one
trailer
on
it.
You'd
have
to
come
back
to
this
commission.
Yes,
I
will
pay
in
that
in
that,
and
I
would
recommend
that
we
approve
this
rezoning
with
the
understanding
that
it
would
be
cute
to
only
allowing
one
trailer
on
this
property.
Second,.
A
B
N
Yes,
my
name
is
Mary
Carson
and
my
mother
and
I
own
diamond
one
decor,
which
is
a
DBA
of
energy-wise
builders.
We
have
recently
purchased
4695
Vaughn
Road,
it's
known
as
the
formerly
and
interiors
building
we're
currently
moving
our
furniture
store
into
this
new
location.
The
building
is
known
v3q,
which
we
would
like
to
modify
to
include
limited
Class
C.
N
A
K
A
D
Mr.
chairman
remembers
a
plan
commission
thank
y'all
for
what
you're
doing
tonight,
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
mr.
Clarence
ball.
Mr.
ball
is
a
has
the
adjacent
property
under
contract,
which
is
shown
in
blue
on
your
drawings,
about
nine
acres
of
that
whole
one
property
there
and
mr.
ball
proposes
to
do
a
health
care
facility
on
aprox
ly,
nine
to
ten
acres
of
that
property.
D
So
I'm
here
tonight
on
his
behalf
to
offer
his
approvals
subject
to
the
letter
that
I
have
provided
to
you
and
I
would
like
to
make
this
letter
part
of
the
record
and
I
will
read
it
mr.
Clarence
involved.
They
proposed
bio
45251.
Road
has
no
objection
to
the
owner
of
4695
honor
of
hosting
wedding
events
at
4695,
Vaughan
Road,
we'll
call
it
the
building
but
subject
to
the
following
conditions.
Our
wedding
event
shall
occur
inside
the
building.
D
No
music
will
be
played
outside
the
building
at
any
time
no
alcoholic
beverages
will
be
consumed
or
served
outside
the
building
at
any
time
and
no
other
uses
in
v3
Class
C
youth
will
be
permitted.
I'm.
Looking
at
the
agenda
that
Miss
whoreson
submitted
and
in
the
in
your
agenda,
she
specifically
stated
that
she
wanted
the
use
to
allow
the
owner
to
host
weddings
I
heard
the
petitioners
state
that
she
would
like
special
events.
D
A
N
A
M
Evening,
I'm,
Earl,
Martin
and
I
am
the
president
of
young
farm
residential
Association,
which
is
represented
in
yellow
on
the
picture.
We
have.
No
objection
to
the
use
of
this
property
has
described
in
this
letter
that
mr.
Stanley
just
presented.
I
was
a
little
concerned
until
I
saw
this
because
we
had
had
no
description
of
what
the
property's
use
would
be,
and
so
that's
why
I
came
down
tonight
to
find
out.
But
after
talking
to
mr.
Stanley
and
I
understand,
there's
been
some
agreement
with
it.
M
You
know
with
the
owners
of
the
property,
we
don't
have
any
any
objection
based
on
the
use
of
the
property
for
weddings
at
all
and
unfortunately,
I've
been
married
53
years,
so
I
probably
won't
be
using
it,
but
maybe
maybe
some
people
in
my
neighborhood
well.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
your
consideration.
P
Good
evening
my
name
is
Shelly
Parker
I'm,
a
homeowner
there
at
young
farm
place
right
across
the
street
from
that.
We
just
got
word
of
this
rezoning
like
a
couple
of
days
ago,
so
we
hadn't
had
a
chance
to
talk
to
our
association
but
I'm
against
that
due
to
the
parties
and
the
drinking
right
across
from
my
home,
I
feel
like
it,
a
property
bring
down
my
property
value
when
I
moved
in
that
subdivision.
P
Ten
years
ago
it
was
a
retired
neighborhood,
and
that
was
my
purpose
for
moving
there,
my
husband
retired
Navy
and
we
moved
down
from
Virginia.
So
that's
what
attracted
it
to
us
and
I
feel
like
to
bring
that
into
our
neighborhood.
It's
going
to
drastically
reduce
the
value
because
I
feel
like
there
will
be
the
drinking
and
maybe
in
a
couple
of
doors
from
that
which
unfortunately
I've
had
the
incident
before
when
there
was
celebration
club
down
a
couple
of
doors.
Somebody
ran
from
that
spot
scaled.
P
My
fence
in
the
police
in
the
neighborhood
I,
really
don't
want
to
have
that
that
close
to
me
again.
So,
for
that
reason,
I'm
against
that
rezoning
I'm
sure
a
lot
of
my
neighbors
would
agree
with
me
if
they
would
have
been
notified
in
a
timely
manner.
So
I
would
like
for
that
to
be
taken
into
consideration.
I
have.
B
P
They
drink
inside,
they
have
to
come
out
at
some
time.
That's
that's
my
concern.
There
I
mean
if
they
took
guarantee
a
wedding
with
no
drinking.
That's
fine,
you
know
I,
don't
disapprove
of
the
wedding,
but
if
there
is
a
wedding
and
there's
drinking
I
feel
like
there
is
that
possibility,
because
they
can't
stay
inside
even
with
the
drinking
they
have
to
come
out.
Sometime
and
every
day
you
turn
on
the
news.
It's
unfortunate
that
you
you're
saying
we're
at
a
gathering.
A
Your
main
concerns,
you
know,
mine's,
a
wedding
is
just
an
alcohol
consumption
that
problematic
English.
That's
what
I
heard
exactly
okay,
so
real
quick.
Have
you
have
a
chance
to
talk
to
her
neighborhood
association,
this
off
Portland?
We
come
closer.
Please
you
don't
matter
so
you
had.
You
have
a
guest
speaker
that
particular
neighborhood
association.
P
F
P
A
A
F
M
A
G
M
A
M
A
M
N
Proposed
plans
for
the
interior
of
the
building
I
understand
that
her
concern
is
drinking
with
all
due
respect.
Thank
you
with
all
due
respect
across
the
street
from
me.
Is
an
ABC
liquor
store,
so
there's
liquor
in
that
vicinity,
no
matter
what
I'm,
certainly
not
having
a
bar
or
a
club
or
anything
of
the
nature.
N
I
have
several
physicians
groups
that
want
to
have
holiday
parties,
we're
not
looking
to
have
a
bar
with
a
lot
of
drinking
simply
an
elegant
wedding
reception
in
a
beautiful
building
and
the
building
is
sat
vacant
for
years.
So
we're
just
trying
to
bring
it
back
from
an
empty
vacant,
building
to
something
that
the
community
can
be
proud
of
and
I.
K
I
was
concerned
when
mr.
Stanley
made
the
comment,
will
you
be
having
anything
other
than
wedding,
such
as
receptions
or
other
types
of
events?
There
are
that
your
plans
to
have
things
like
that,
but
I,
don't
think
his
letter
address
those
types
of
comments.
If
it
did
I
missed
it,
I
mean
you're
having
a
Christmas
party
for
a
doctors,
Association
correct.
N
K
J
K
N
A
Hang
on
we're
not
going
to
do
that
right
two
seconds,
because
I've
got
a
question,
sir
special
events
from
where
you're
coming
from
and
the
way
I'm
saying
this
is
it
says,
amusement
and
assembly.
If
that's
how
it's
described
in
our
packet,
how
many
people
can
you
accommodate
for
whatever
special
event?
If
you
had
I.
N
N
A
A
If
you
want
us
to
vote
on
that
tonight,
we
will,
but
I
would
prefer
that
you
guys
have
an
opportunity
to
talk,
particularly
with
the
neighborhood,
who
has
no
idea
what
you're
talking
about,
and
there
never
was
that
on
the
same
side
of
the
street
that
you.
So
if
you're
agreeable
to
do
that,
maybe
then
we
would
see
you
next
next
next
month.
F
Q
Q
Everything
was
posted
in
the
neighbourhood
about
the
rezoning
and
the
gentleman
with
the
homeowners
association
he
came
and
the
other
homeowners
associations
did
not,
and
it's
going
to
put
a
strain
on
us.
If
we
can't
go
ahead
and
arrange
to
have
what
we
tried
to
do
by
mid-september
and
that's
if
we
can't
we
can't
but
I
I,
don't
know
what
else
to
say.
We've
agreed
to
everything
we've
been
asked
and
I
understand.
A
Your
concerns,
rounding
and
and
Alan
I
would
love
to
see
that
building
help
some
more
life
in
it.
The
complaint
I
have
is
to
two
concerns.
One
is
that
your
next-door
neighbor
or
neighbor
in
that
area
has
expressed
a
concern
if
she's
unaware
what's
going
on
and
she
stood
there
second
ago
with
a
friend
and
she
bought
for
her
retirement
so
forth
to
understand
all
that.
I.
Just
think
that
somebody
needs
explaining
that
to
her.
Another
thing
is
anything
to
say
this.
A
You
say
in
here
like
no,
but
nobody
can
quantify
that
or
says.
Yes,
those
are
not
two
concerns
about
what
happens
with
overflow
parking
if
it's,
if
the
demand
is
beyond
the
sixty
five
spaces
in
the
part
of
the
gravel
spaces
that
you
have
demonstrated
tonight,
I
don't
know
them.
But
here
again
you
asked
for
a
rezoning
and
we'll
be
delighted
to
vote
on
it,
but
I'm
just
saying
that,
just
as
the
previous
petitioner
based
they
decided
to
move
forward.
A
K
K
Q
And
that's
that's
the
range
we're
looking
at,
we
don't
have
it
we're
small
or
us,
and
we
just
don't
have
the
ability
to
do
of
two
or
three
hundred
wedding
or
we
have
Diane
Teague
and
I.
Don't
know
if
you
all
know
her
or
not.
She's
asked
for
a
doctor's
reception,
we've
I
know
when
Leanne
had
the
building.
There
were
a
lot
of
parties
and
and.
K
Can
I
approach
it
another
aamir
another
way,
do
you
ever
envy
and
I
know
this
is
looking
at
the
fortune
cookies.
Okay,
do
you
ever
envision
anything
over
125
people?
Yes,
okay,
Tommy
125
people
equates
to
approximately
how
many
cards
cans
their
way
to
mentally
give
us
a
guesstimate
are
I
one
of
the
engineers
well.
A
Let
me
jump
right
in
and
say
this:
it's
in
our
packet:
it
tells
it
what
requirements
are
and
it's
depending
on
which
district
we're
going
with
this
either
one
and
a
quarter
spaces
for
200
square
feet
of
gross
building
area.
So,
however
many
square
feet,
their
growth
building
is
would
have
to
be
divided
by
Department.
K
A
K
A
I
want
I
want
to
stop,
though.
Let's
just
skip
but
I
got
to
jump
in
here
see
that's.
Why
I
asked,
of
course,
about
level
people,
because
the
fire
marshal
will
determine
that.
Try,
see
what
I
mean
and
I,
don't
think.
That's
within
our
purview
appear
tonight
is
to
determine
Octopussy
load
for
their
building.
You
see
so
I
want
to
get
into
that
aspect
of
the
discussion
about
determine
an
occupant
load,
because
that's
another
jurisdiction.
A
A
The
next
thing
that
I
want
to
bring
up
is,
he
said
if
you
win,
missus
families
I
have
an
agreement,
but
I
don't
think
to
do,
because
what
mrs.
Stanley
read
or
what
she
just
explained,
the
two
totally
different
things
he
is
limiting
his
consent
to
this
for
where's
I
saw
the
sheet
that
you
have
ma'am
but
I
think
you're,
asking
for
special
events,
which
includes
weddings
that
other
potential
activities
other
than
weddings
and
I.
Don't
know
what
mrs.
Stanley
have
agreed
to
those
other
things
other
than
weddings.
D
Yes,
the
petitioner
and
I
did
have
that
discussion
about
special
events.
Okay,
but
then
in
the
in
the
agenda,
they're
asking
for
weddings,
not
special
events.
Special
events
is
a
very
broad
term.
I,
don't
know
how
you
can
get
real
specific
with
that.
Then,
when
I
discussed
this
with
mr.
ball
who's
proposing
to
buy
the
property
next
door
and
use
it
for
assisted
living
retirement
center,
whatever
he
prefers
that
it
be
limited
to
wedding
use,
only
that's
pretty
specific.
D
A
A
A
Got
some
weddings
will
be
put
on
it,
but
I'm,
just
simply
saying
is:
is
that
I
won't
know
if
anybody's
an
agree
with
what
they've
just
presented
better
their
neighbors
or
prospective
buyers,
not
the
point
I'm
trying
to
make,
as
is
that
they're
here
and
there's
opposition
to
it,
and
we
can
certainly
vote
on
it,
but
I
would
like
for
them
to
have
a
chance
to
talk
about
it.
But
if
that's
not
possible,
then
we'll
will
here
emotion,
they'll.
R
F
P
A
Q
A
B
E
Good
evening,
I'm
Chris
Clayton
with
commercial
site
design
out
of
Raleigh
North
Carolina
here
representing
cookout
restaurants,
we're
here
to
obtain
development
plan
approval
for
the
proposed
cookout
restaurant
at
1355,
Eastern
Boulevard.
You
may
recall
that
cookout
presented
a
development
plan
to
the
Commission
back
in
December
of
2015
when
they
were
looking
to
develop
the
southern
half
of
this
site.
They've
since
purchased
the
property
and
decided
to
move
their
development
to
the
northern
half
of
the
lot
and
that's
why
we're
here
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have?
Okay.
A
E
A
B
A
F
E
Chris
Clayton
commercial
site,
design
on
half
cookout
restaurants,
in
conjunction
with
the
development
plan
we
just
discussed.
This
is
the
recombination
plat
for
the
same
property
there
at
Zelda,
Roatan
and
Street
again
just
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
the
Commission
may
have
with
regard
to
the
plat
art.
S
A
S
A
S
Again,
Kenneth
white
flowers
of
white,
representing
Park,
Place,
Center
LLC.
This
HUD
was
approved
several
months
ago
with
a
twenty
foot
front
setback
on
the
thirty
and
fifty
foot
lights
and
the
owner
wishes
to
move
the
house
closer
to
the
right-of-way
to
make
more
stately
look
that's
what
we're
asking
for
a
zero
foot
front
setback
in
lieu
of
the
twenty
foot
setback
that
was
asked
for
a
couple
months
ago.
Okay,.
A
Just
to
be
clear,
we
do
vote
on
this.
I
know
this
is
a
little
bit
strange
since
we
had
been
doing
it
recently,
but
this
is
the
voting
item.
So
members
of
the
Commission,
do
you
have
any
questions
of
comments?
Okay,
David,
seeing
none
any
members
of
the
audience
of
to
speak
for
or
against
his
eyes,
seeing
none
a
motion
in
order
move.
A
S
Kenneth
why
the
flowers
are
white
representing
to
impound,
see
my
client
Phillip
Allen,
see
a
rezoning,
a
portion
of
his
property
I
think
back
in
2005
to
a
b2q.
They
have
some
qualifications
in
that
as
well.
We
met
none
at
the
time
with
the
adjacent
property
owners,
and
that's
that
really
is
adjacent
to
that
property.
The
the
area
in
red
is
the
remaining
property
that
he
has
he's
owned.
Ag
wine
I
believe
and
he's
asking
to
rezone
that
to
a
b24,
his
whole
property
being
zoned
b-two,
okay,.
S
Mentor
Reeves
I
could
say,
though
they
were
notified,
that
we
left
business
cards
with
every
lot.
That
touched
us
cylinder
on
the
front.
Porch
will
release
my
client
didn't
Philip
house.
He
did,
though
they
weren't
notified
because
it
was
adjacent
and
her
budding
in
the
property.
We
did
try
to
notify
them.
Call
the
adjacent
bro,
no.
E
B
S
S
S
A
A
A
For
found
man
turn
Thomas
mic
up.
Please.
A
But
I
don't
want
to
move
forward
Leslie.
You
have
the
problem
with
the
advertising,
but
feeling
like
you
did
at
least
for
what's
available
to
what's
required
to
comply
with
right.
Yes,
master,
okay,
all
right
any
other
questions
or
comments
for
Katie,
any
members
of
the
audience's
to
speak
for
or
against
desire,
seeing
none
emotional
orders
I.
B
B
T
Hey
Paul
McClendon
with
Larry
speaks
and
associates
and
on
behalf
of
Huntington
College,
we
are
seeking
flat
approval
for
Huntington
college
plat
number
one,
five
point:
five:
nine
acres
at
the
corner
of
Woodley
and
narrow
lane
roads
if
you've
been
by
the
site.
Recently,
you
may
have
noticed
the
construction
going
on
there
for
a
new
soccer
field
and
softball
field.
T
The
city
engineering
department
requested
the
plat
in
order
to
more
clearly
establish
the
rights
of
way
of
Woodley
and
Marilyn
Road,
also
to
provide
easements
for
the
construction
of
future
sidewalks
along
literally
Road
and
as
kind
of
a
canvas
to
handle,
spillage
and
hold
harmless
agreements.
I'll
be
glad
to
answer
any
questions.
Rimmer's.
A
B
So
next
items
by
Larry
speaks
associates
on
behalf
of
the
Board
of
Education
in
Montgomery
County.
It's
a
request
for
final
approval:
Henry
Allen,
Lovelace
platinum,
the
one
on
the
north
and
south
sides
of
June
Street
between
Braddock
Street
and
you'll,
Street
and
institutional
and
our
60d
districts.
T
Again,
Paul
McClendon
with
Alaric's,
picks
and
associates
we're
seeking
plat
approval
on
behalf
of
the
Board
of
Education
for
a
reef
flat
of
numerous
previously
flatted
Lots,
as
well
as
unplanted
property,
you'll
notice.
In
the
end,
the
plat
that
we're
basically
combining
them
into
three
three
Lots
lot:
a
is
the
portion
of
the
property
where
the
former
school
building
still
currently
sits.
Block
B
is
the
portion
of
property
where
the
community
center
sits
and
then
lot
C
is
the
rear
of
the
property,
where
the
parking
as
parking
was
used
by
the
school
board.
T
K
K
K
T
T
M
O
K
F
A
T
A
A
G
A
T
T
G
T
Is
what
be
is
where
the
community
center
currently
sits
the
community
right
and
that
the
community
center
will
be
conveyed
to
the
city?
So
the
city
will
take
I'll.
Take
ownership
of
that.
The
lot
where
the
building
the
school
building
itself
currently
sits
and
the
rear
lot
where
the
parking
is.
Those
are
the
properties
that
would
be
sold.
A
P
G
G
It
just
says
the
Montgomery
County
Board
of
Education,
which
has
lovely
school
Herman
Harris
graduate
he's
sitting
right
here
now
the
reason
he
was
on
the
board
at
that
time
recently
deeded
to
the
city
of
Montgomery
60,
feet
of
space
that
sits
between
the
school
and
its
neighboring
community
center.
So
you're
not
aware
it
is
60
feet
and
it's
a.
G
G
K
T
T
A
G
I
have
mr.
Harris
here
that
was
with
the
Board
of
Education
when
this
property
was
deeded,
and
he
asked
some
comments
in
regard
to
lovely
school
being
sold,
because
that
we
were
not
aware
that,
because
we
had
plans
for
the
school
to
put
a
Technology,
Center
Henry
ada,
lovelace,
Technology
Center,
that
you
probably
know
anything
about
it
all
will.
G
A
F
All
right,
Frankfurt,
which
well
I
mean
with
Herman
Harris
I
I'm,
not
fully
aware
of
everything's
being
said,
but
I
could
say
what
our
concern
is
about
this
whole
matter:
we're
not
interested
in
owning
the
property.
Anything
like
that.
We're
only
concerned
about
the
lovely
school
building
and
its
historical
significance.
F
We
would
like
very
much
that
building
to
preserved
and
not
ever
destroyed
and
we'll
explore
the
possibility
of
the
u.s.
Park
Service
may
be
titled
building,
because
it
adds
the
historical
significance
it,
along
with
the
book
of
the
washington
bill,
is
that
for
the
two
first
public
school
building,
two
blacks
of
uncovering
another
thing
that
is
directly
on
the
seventh
of
uncommon
historic
trail,
and
for
that
the
Park
Service
might
possibly
be
interred
in
it.
It
could
be
a
satellite
interpretive
center.
F
F
T
K
F
B
T
A
B
Speaks
and
associates
on
behalf
of
Amity
Construction,
Company,
Inc
and
Jeffrey
and
Joanne
sets
in
here
request
final
approval
of
Montgomery's
professional
office
park.
Platen
number
one
be
on
the
east
side
of
st.
Luke's
drive
four
hundred
and
forty
feet,
north
of
comp
a
few
drives
and
a
no
one
district
again.
T
Paul
McClendon
Larry
speaks
and
associates
on
behalf
of
Amity
construction
and
mr.
Ness
si
singer.
We
are
requesting
plat
approval
for
a
replate
of
lights,
five
and
six
of
the
Montgomery
East
professional
office
park,
plat
number
one
B
or
number
one
we're
creating.
Basically
one
lot
from
two
Lots
just
combining
Lots
in
order
to
accommodate
the
previous
development,
making.
T
Paul
McClendon
Larry
speaks
and
associates
on
behalf
of
Lewis
and
Karen
Mashburn.
We
are
requesting
to
rezone,
currently
four
properties,
there's
actually
five
properties
that
are
shown
on
the
map
there.
The
owner
has
has
met
with
adjacent
properties,
adjacent
property
owners.
He
has
agreed
to
remove
parcel
E
from
the
from
the
map,
so
he's
no
longer
requesting
to
rezone
that
at
this
time
this
was
originally
brought
to
the
Planning
Commission
on
March
23rd.
It
was
delayed
to
work
out
some
issues
between
the
owner
and
a
couple
of
adjacent
property
owners.
T
There's
been
a
few
changes
to
that
he's
removed
in
addition
to
the
one
that
was
removed
this
week.
There
was
two
other
properties
that
were
taken
off
the
property
at
the
corner
of
Leonora
street
and
joseph
streets
on
the
southeast
corner.
There
was
added
from
the
previous
previous
meeting
I'll
be
glad
to
answer
any
questions
that
the
total
acreage
is
one
point:
five,
four
acres
that
he's
requesting
rezoning
for
and
the
Cape.
K
A
A
A
R
R
Lewis,
all
that
life
and
I
spoke
with
him
and
he
told
me
they're
the
same.
He
gave
us
a
lot
on
the
right
which
I
told
you
what
basically
whatever
land
off
my
land
and
I,
would
wanted
to
put
the
house
there.
Well,
he
wants
to
put
still
a
storage
container
to
the
left
and
he
said
that
he
would
be
willing
to
put
a
fence,
but
I
still
think
that
that
should
stay
for
all
family
dwellings,
because
I
asked
him
what
you
want
a
storage
facility
next
to
your
own
I.
R
Also,
we
talked
about
him,
possibly
selling
it
same
thing
with
the
previous
owner.
He
told
me
that
he
had
to
talk
with
his
wife
and
his
children.
I
did
called
on
the
county
and
that
Corner's
appraised
at
$1,800,
but
I'm
here
and
I.
Just
totally
disagree.
I
do
not
want
to
storage
container
of
any
type.
Next
to
why
I
plan
to
build
my
home
and.
K
A
R
A
J
R
J
R
A
A
T
F
E
A
A
A
This
after
discussion
about
that
before
you
take
any
action
and
I
will
say
this
I've
done
totally
disagree
with
what
you're
asking
the
only
thing
I
want
to
do
is
understand
more
about
whatever
it
is
that
you're
asked
and
right
now,
I
would
like
to
have
another
discussion
and
if
there's
going
to
be
any
action
taken,
let's
take
it
may
be
that
the
next
mean
but
alone
I'd
like
some
more
details
about
whatever
it
is
that
you're
asking
us
to
do
right
now.
I,
don't
have
that,
but
that's
my
opinion.
A
B
I
want
you
to
know
that
you're,
not
the
only
board
that
we
have,
that
we
staffed
for
full
boards
in
the
planning,
controls
Department,
and
we
advertise
and
post
every
agenda
item
for
all
four
boards,
but
presently
do
that
now,
it's
not
just
reasons,
but
we
post
them
all
because
of
something
in
the
garden
district.
B
It's
nothing.
It's
done.
We
post
them
all.
Now
there
are
occasions
where
a
sign
will
get
knocked
down.
People
cut
grass,
we
have
a
nuisance
abatement
officer
that
cites
properties
for
overgrown
weeds
and
people
rush
you
out
and
get
the
cut
grass
cut
before
they
get
fined
by
the
city
we
I
asked
built
today.
How
often
they
go
missing
and
he
said
rarely,
he
said
now
they'll
be
knocked
down
by
either
somebody's
taking
it
down
for
whatever
reason,
but
not
very
often
cuz.
B
B
Steaks
that
kiln
occasion
end
up
in
people's
go
vegetable
garden,
sister
tomato,
because
it's
a
pretty
guy
nice
piece
of
wood,
but
most
of
the
time
it's
just
due
to
the
weather
or
somebody
like
a
child,
might
come
around
and
knock
it
over.
But
we
go
out
its
hosts.
Every
single
item
on
all
four
boards
coming.
K
K
And
the
reason
I
asked
that
question
was
to
go
back
to
a
comment.
I
made
last
time
had,
and
it
was
no,
it
was.
It
was
an
in
asking
and
in
Fault
forth
to
inform
me
and
have
an
informative
conversation
about
it.
I
wasn't
criticizing
anybody,
I
wasn't,
and
that
was
the
piece
of
private
with
a
road
by
downtown
that
didn't
have
a
sign
on
on
it,
and
you
said
well,
it
had
been
picked
up
that
morning
and
my
suggestion
was
well.
K
K
If
it's,
if
it's,
if,
if
our
signs
in
my
mind,
if
our
signs
are
not
the
day
of
the
meeting,
I,
think
that
we're
not
being
fair
to
the
the
people,
because
that's
it's
like
a
lady
came
here
today
and
said
well
as
first
time
she
saw
it
well,
we
can't
help
that.
But
if
it's
not
there
the
day
of
the
meeting,
I
think
that's
my
clue.
Since
that's
my
thing
did.