►
From YouTube: 5/28/2021 - Assembly Committee on Commerce and Labor
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
A
A
Okay
committee
members
welcome
to
the
evening
edition
of
commerce
and
labor.
We
have
a
very
short
agenda
today,
just
two
bill
hearings,
and
then
we
are
going
to
move
into
a
work
session.
I
think
everyone
is
familiar
with
our
housekeeping
items,
so
I
do
not
want
to
waste
time
and
I
would
like
to
get
us
started
on
our
agenda
and
just
for
those
who
are
here.
I
do
want
to
make
note
that
we
are
removing
senate
bill
205
from
the
agenda
and
we
will
go
ahead
and
take
the
other
two
bills
in
order.
A
C
C
I
am
here
to
talk
to
you
tonight
about
senate
bill
291
a
bill
that
seeks
to
expand
the
practice
of
cosmetology
by
including
the
practice
of
advanced
aesthetics
on
the
zoom
is
gary
landry
he's
the
executive
director
of
the
state
board
of
cosmetology
who
will
answer
any
questions
and
chair
haudiki.
With
your
permission
when
I'm
finished
presenting,
if
I
could
head
back
to
education,
where
we
are
doing
a
work
session.
C
That
time
of
session
and
miss
bells
is
here
to
answer
any
questions
in
my
absence.
Thank
you.
The
aesthetic
industry
is
swiftly
evolving,
with
technology
advances
such
as
cosmetic
lasers
and
medical
light
based
devices
taking
skin
care
and
anti-aging
to
the
next
level.
However,
many
of
the
newest
innovations
in
skin
care
do
not
fall
under
the
scope
of
practice
of
the
current
nevada
aesthetics
license.
C
These
new
procedures
use
the
state
of
the
art
technology
and
the
inability
to
license
these
procedures
poses
a
problem
for
spas
who
want
to
offer
these
services
for
estheticians
who
want
to
perform
them.
According
to
the
skin
care
professionals,
there
are
approximately
183
000
estheticians
licensed
in
the
united
states.
In
addition,
the
u.s
bureau
of
labor
statistics
expects
that
between
2019
and
2029,
the
number
of
skin
care
specialists
licensed
in
the
united
states
will
increase
by
a
full
17
percent
just
to
keep
pace
with
the
growing
demand
for
aesthetic
services.
C
All
states
require
estheticians
to
complete
some
type
of
education
or
training
before
they
can
qualify
for
licensure
a
few
jurisdictions.
The
states
of
washington,
utah
virginia
and
washington
dc
currently
recognize
a
two-tier
esthetician
license,
which,
with
additional
training,
education
in
master
aesthetics
program
or
apprenticeship,
sorry
apprenticeship
is
required
to
become
a
licensed
master
esthetician.
C
C
Section
19
prohibits
an
esthetician
from
engaging
in
the
practice
of
advanced
aesthetics
unless
the
esthetician
obtains
an
endorsement
to
his
or
her
license
to
engage
in
the
practice
of
advanced
aesthetics
sections,
1920,
20.5
and
45
set
forth
procedures
for
examination
obtaining
the
issuance
of
an
endorsement
to
practice.
Advanced
aesthetics
and
section
22
authorized
and
authorizes
an
esthetician
to
practice,
advanced
aesthetics
in
a
non-ablative,
aesthetic,
medical
procedures
under
certain
circumstances
and
under
the
supervision
of
a
health
care
professional.
C
These
this
section
also
prohibits
these
professionals
from
performing
any
ablative
aesthetic
medical
procedures.
Section
23
requires
the
board
to
adopt
regulations
prescribing
a
curriculum,
for
course,
study
in
advanced
aesthetics
and
outline
certain
subjects
that
must
be
included
in
the
instruction
of
advanced
aesthetics.
C
Section
25
provides
that
all
provides
the
certain
licensed
medical,
perfect
professionals
authorized
to
practice
in
their
respective
professional
who
engage
in
the
practice
of
advanced
aesthetics
are
exempt
from
the
requirements
of
this
bill.
Finally,
section
39
requires
a
licensed
cosmetology
establishment
to
display,
in
plain
view,
a
sign
stating
the
establishment
is
not
a
medical
facility.
C
I
might
in
closing
just
let
you
know
that
the
bill
was
amended
to
because
there
was
concern
from
doctors
that
might
think
people
doing
advanced
aesthetics
for
physicians,
and
that
is
why,
on
their
and
at
their
facility,
they
have
to
say
that
this
is
not
a
medical
facility.
C
There
was
also
there
was
also
concern
about
these
deep
tissue
procedures.
C
A
Thank
you,
okay
and
I
do
have
a
couple
questions,
but
I'm
going
to
go
to
the
members
first
to
see
if
there
are
any
questions
from
the
members
assembly,
member
flores.
D
And
thank
you
senator.
I
did
have
an
opportunity
to
speak
with
with
some
of
the
stakeholders
and-
and
they
did
a
great
job,
giving
me
a
breakdown
of
the
bill.
The
only
the
only
question
that
I
had,
if
you
could
provide
an
example
of
a
scenario
we've
seen
where,
unfortunately,
because
lack
of
adequate
training
there
may
have
been
somebody
who
was
injured
or
you
know
just
so.
We
understand
the
the
severity
of
not
having
that
second
tier
expertise
that
we're
trying
to
get
out
to
now.
C
Sure
I
think
the
reason
that
we
need
the
advanced
esthetician,
because,
frankly,
estheticians
are
doing
these
practices
all
around
nevada
all
around
the
strip,
and
they
have
no
oversight
over
what
they're
doing
so
having
an
advanced
esthetician's
license,
provides
oversight
so
that
these
institutions
that
are
doing
this
work
will
be
now
governed
by
the
cosmetology
board
and
have
some
accountability
for
what
they're
doing.
Did
you
want
a
specific
example,
because
I
could
ask
gary.
D
Yeah,
madam,
yes,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
for
indulging
me
for
with
the
follow-up.
Yes,
so
I
and
I
understand
that
it
makes
sense.
You
want
to
create
uniformity
across
the
state
that
makes
perfect
sense
and
put
in
the
hands
of
the
correct
folk
to
do
that.
But
I
am
curious
to
know
if
there's
also
an
element
of
concern,
because
we've
seen
folks
who
don't
have
that
added
layer
of
training-
and
you
know
have
unfortunately
made
mistakes
and
or
we've
seen
folk
that
come
out
injured.
C
Sure
gary
could
you
answer
that
question.
E
Sure
I
can
there
has
been
several
cases
that
have
come
up
and
they
involve
estheticians
not
practicing
in
an
aesthetic
office,
but
practicing
outside
of
the
aesthetics
office,
sometimes
doing
things
that
they
shouldn't
be
doing
all
the
time
doing
things
they
shouldn't
be
doing,
and
people
got
hurt
the
thing
that
this
bill
will
do
it'll
allow
us
to
go
in
and
inspect
and
make
sure
that
they're
doing
the
doing
things
the
right
way
and
doing
them
without
harming
people.
The
people
who
got
harmed
had
burned
skin.
They
had
scraped
skin.
F
C
Senator
so
the
the
cosmetology
board
will
work
to
create
the
curriculum
and
they'll
get
training
in
the
bill.
It
has
a
list,
I
think,
of
six
kinds
of
treatments
that
they'll
do
and
the
curriculum
will
relate
to
those
things.
C
Gary
would
you
speak
to
the
curriculum?
Please.
G
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
If
I
understand
correctly,
you
first
must
become
an
aesthetician
and
that's
supervised,
licensed
by
the
board
of
cosmetology,
correct
senator.
Then
you
go
back
to
school.
You
do
so
many
100
hours
600.
Then
you
go
back
to
school
for
another
400
hours,
I'm
not
mistaken
by
a
trainee,
and
then
you
come
out.
G
You
still
have
some
supervision
or
several
hundred
hours
to
complete.
So
before
you
can
be
accredited
as
an
advanced
esthetician.
So
my
question
is
you're
already.
The
cosmetology
board
is
already
supervising
these
people
they're
already
licensed
by
the
cosmetology
board.
Why
do
we
have
to
charge
an
additional
fee
when
they're
already
under
super?
I
don't
see
what's
different,
they're
already
being
supervisors
controlled,
the
board
has
the
ability
to
regulate
them.
C
Cinder
lang
for
the
record,
if
you
look
in
your
bill
in
section
19
number,
four
or
letter
number
four
letter,
a
a
person
has
to
complete
900
hours
of
training
in
a
licensed
school
cosmetology
in
a
curriculum
prescribed
by
the
board,
and
then
in
b.
The
person
is
a
licensed.
Esthetician
has
additionally
completed
at
least
300
hours
in
training
in
a
licensed
school
of
cosmetology
and
a
curriculum
prescribed
by
the
board,
and
so
then
I'm
going
to
let
gary
speak
to
the
the
cost
and
the
oversight.
Please.
E
Sure,
and
just
to
let
everyone
know
just
as
senator
lang
I
identified
you
can
go,
you
can
go
in
and
have
your
go
in
and
get
a
master
advanced,
esthetician
degree
first
off
for
900
hours.
If
you're
already
an
esthetician
and
you
weren't
sure
that
you
want
to
get
advanced
esthetician,
then
you
go
back
for
an
additional
300
hours
and
that's
that's
what
you
would
do.
The
cost
is
going
to
be
relative
to
the
number
of
hours.
G
E
E
G
E
A
Members,
okay:
I
do
have
a
couple
of
questions
senator
link
you
had
mentioned
during
your
testimony.
A
You
touched
on
endorsements
and
I
believe
that
was
you
had
sent
over
an
amendment
that
you
then
pulled
and
said
we
were
going
to
work
off
the
third
reprint,
but
then
you
mentioned
in
the
endorsement
section
which
was
included
in
the
amendment,
but
not
in
this
third
reprint.
So
are
you
bringing
forth
an
amendment.
C
No,
we
are
not
I'm
hoping
I
didn't
misspeak,
because
the
new
license
is
like
an
endorsement
on
their
current
license
and
originally
do
you
want
me
to
go
into
the
amendment
that
we
were
no,
so
this
is
it
okay,.
C
Okay,
so
chair
howdy,
if
I
could,
if
you'll
look
in
the
bill
on,
let
me
see
on
page
it's
probably
different
in
mine,
but
it
is
in
section
20
or
20.5.
C
C
C
So
there's
lots,
there's
availability
and
currently
places
that
are
offering
esthetician
licenses
are
looking
at
expanding.
Should
this
bill
cost?
So
I
think
there
are
several
gary.
Could
you
speak
to
the
specifics.
E
Sure
there
are
currently
14
schools
in
the
state
of
nevada
teaching,
cosmetology
and
all
the
different
sub
subcategories
aesthetics
being
one
of
them,
and
those
schools
would
then
be
going
forward
to
learn
the
advanced
esthetician
courses
and
being
able
to
teach
them.
We
think
that
there's
going
to
probably
be
anywhere
from
seven
to
12
schools
that
will
teach
the
advanced
estheticians.
E
Right
right
now,
I
I
don't
know
the
exact
number.
I
think
it's
around
five
thousand
but
I'll
check
and
see
and
get
to
get
the
revised
number
out
to
the
committee.
H
A
H
H
H
H
H
B
Good
evening,
chairman
hatakey
and
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
matt
brinton
b-r-I-n-q-n,
I'm
the
ceo
of
the
national
institute
of
modern
aesthetics
located
in
las
vegas.
We
want
to
thank
senator
lang
for
bringing
this
bill
forward
and
the
board
of
cosmetology
for
working
with
us
on
it.
Nema
is
in
full
support
of
sb
291
and
the
creation
of
an
advanced
aesthetic
license.
We
know
that
estheticians
in
nevada
also
support
this
legislation
and
there
are
lengthy
waitlists
at
the
schools
waiting
for
this
legislation
to
pass.
B
There's
a
lot
to
say
my
time
is
short,
so
I'll,
be
brief
and
highlight
the
two
biggest
benefits
of
this
legislation:
consumer
safety
and
the
creation
of
new
and
higher
paying
jobs.
This
legislation
addresses
consumer
safety
because
it
will
finally
require
education
and
training
for
the
providers
of
advanced
asset,
aesthetic
services.
B
Surprisingly,
these
services
are
currently
unregulated
in
nevada.
Trained
practitioners
will
provide
consumers
safer
and
more
effective
treatment,
and,
second,
this
bill
create
jobs,
more
stable
and
higher
paying
jobs,
and
particularly
particularly
for
women,
who
make
up
the
vast
majority
of
cosmetology
and
aesthetic
service
services
providers,
consumer
safety
and
jobs.
Creation
are
two
benefits.
I
know
we
want
for
nevada,
so
please
support
sb
291.
Thank
you
for
your
time
today.
H
A
A
I
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair,
mr
landry
nice,
to
see
you
again
so
I'm
trying
to
remember
the
the
scope
of
practice
with
the
the
original
estheticians
and
I
always
stumble
over
that
word.
Esthetician's
license
and
now
we're
talking
about
a
master.
So
I
would
really
like
to
understand
the
difference.
What
types
of
procedures
are
we
talking
about?
I
know
there
have
been
concerns
that
some
of
these
come
pretty
close
to
medical
procedures
and-
and
you
and
I
had
this
conversation
years
ago,
we
worked
on
a
number
of
different
issues.
I
In
the
past
we
we've
had
all
different
types
of
conversations.
A
a
decade
ago,
we
even
had
an
interim
committee
on
on
some
of
these
issues,
so
I'm
just
concerned
about
what
are
the
acts?
Where
does
the
actual
scope
of
practice
lie?
When
you
become
the
master,
what
types
of
things
will
they
be
able
to
do.
E
Co-Chair
carlson
the
things
that
you
would
be
able
to
do
once
you
got
the
advanced
esthetician
would
be
exfoliation,
which
is
using
a
scalpel
to
remove
smooth
hair
particles,
microdermabrasion,
which
is
an
aggressive
abrasion
of
the
skin
micro
needling,
taking
small
needles
and
scraping
across
the
skin.
Don't
don't
ex!
E
I
don't
know
why
these
things
come
up,
but
this
these
are
things
that
they're
that
they're
wanting
to
do,
dermaplaning,
that's
taking
a
scalpel
and
running
it
against
the
skin
extraction,
using
needles
and
tools
to
extract
filaments
and
different
things
beneath
the
skin
and
hydrotherapy
using
water
to
to
make
the
skin
look
nicer
and
fresher
also
using
doing
non-ablative,
aesthetic
medical
procedures,
that's
using
lasers
and
other
high-energy
machines
to
eliminate
hair
particles.
I
And
thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair,
so
so,
mr
landry,
the
one
that
piqued
my
interest
was
basically
being
able
to
break
the
skin
with
the
needle
we've
had.
That
seems
to
be
the
line
in
the
sand.
A
number
of
times
I
mean
the
the
needling,
whether
it's
dry,
needling
or
the
the
micro
abrasion
is
one
thing
so
when
they
break
the
skin
with
a
needle,
will
they
be
extracting
anything?
I
Or
is
this
I,
I
understand
the
scalpel
part
and
the
exfoliation,
but
when
we
start
allowing
folks
that
are
at
this
level
of
education
and
nothing
against
that,
but
when
they
start
putting
needles
into
people,
that's
where
the
one
needle
one
patient
one
use
rule
comes
in.
We've
had
issues
with
that
in
the
state
before
and
we
start
crossing
over
into
medical
procedures
and
and
that's
where
the
line
in
the
sand
has
been
crossed
in
the
past.
E
They're,
typically
inserting
it
in
order
to
remove
hair
follicles,
it's
only
it's
only
to
go
just
beneath
the
surface
of
the
skin.
It's
not
to
go
below
the
surface.
It's
just
at
the
surface
of
the
skin
to
remove
it
so
they're
not
actually
puncturing
the
surface
of
the
skin.
They
just
use
the
needle
to
go
in
and
lift
the
hair
follicle
out.
I
I
Okay,
thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair.
I
think
that
makes
the
record
a
little
clearer.
I
I
still
have
some
concerns
when
my
dermatologist
comes
at
me
to
take
the
little
nooks
and
crannies
off
my
nose
and
ears
and
chin,
he
uses
a
scalpel,
so
I'm
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
that,
but
hearing
that
there's
actually
no
blood
extraction
involved
in
this.
That
makes
me
a
little
more
comfortable.
Thank
you.
A
And
I
just
want
to
follow
up
on
bystar
carlton's
question
and
I'm
sorry
we
didn't
ask
this
earlier,
mr
landry,
during
the
presentation
portion,
but
aren't
they
aren't
they
already
licensed
to
do
hydrotherapy,
dermaplaning,
vampire,
facials.
E
They
are
not
that
that's
not
part
of
their
curriculum
training.
Now
this
all
the
things
that
we're
talking
about
all
the
six
different
techniques
that
we're
talking
about
would
be,
in
addition
to
the
basic
training
that
they
get
most
of
the
training
that
they
get
now
is
based
on
using
using
tools
to
put
eyelashes
on
and
eyebrows
and
also
doing
things
for
the
working
skin
in
the
face
and
the
body.
E
Those
things
are
all
being
taught,
but
these
advanced
techniques
that
we're
talking
about
the
derma
planing,
the
micro
needling,
the
skin,
the
lasers,
to
remove
hair
those
are
not
being
taught
now
and
they
shouldn't
be
pre
used
by
any
aesthetician.
Now
the
problem
is,
there
are
some
estheticians
that
are
doing
that,
because
they
receive
training
from
an
equipment
manufacturer.
A
So
currently,
currently
you
don't
have
to
have
a
license
to
perform
those
procedures.
E
A
Thank
you.
Okay.
With
that,
I
will
close
the
hearing
on
senate
bill.
291
members.
The
next
bill
on
our
agenda
is
senate
bill
453.
I
believe
we
have
ms
sandio
laughlin
here
to
present
the
bill.
A
H
Sb
453,
which
revises
various
provisions
concerning
the
issuance
of
licenses
and
certificates
by
the
division.
Sb
453
authorizes
such
licenses
and
certificates
to
be
used
and
and
renewed
through
the
nationwide
multi-state
licensing
system
and
registry,
which
I
refer
to
as
nmls.
H
H
H
The
sections
of
the
bill
provide
the
same
requirements
and
authorizations
for
each
different
chapter,
which
includes
in
summary,
authorizes
fit
to
participate
in
the
nmls
provides
for
certain
actions.
It
may
take
concerning
participations
in
the
nmls
authorizes
bid
and
the
nmls
to
collect
certain
information
and
fees
through
the
system
authorizes
fit
to
continue
its
current
practices
of
obtaining
fingerprint
cards
to
submit
to
the
fbi
for
purposes
of
background
checks
by
way
of
nmls.
H
The
bill
requires
each
licensee
to
register
and
maintain
a
unique
identifier
with
mls
revises
the
renewal
dates
to
align
with
the
nmls
system,
which
will
benefit
the
licensees
that
are
licensed
in
multiple
states
because
they
will
now
be
able
to.
They
will
now
have
the
option
to
renew
in
all
states.
They
hold
licenses
in,
at
the
same
time,
provides
for
renewal
and
and
reins
and
reinstatement
periods,
and
provides
for
annual
reported
commission
to
the
to
the
commissioner
to
be
submitted
through
nmls
instead
of
directly
to
fit.
This
concludes
my
testimony.
A
B
H
For
the
question
san
diego
lachlan
for
the
record-
yes,
currently
we
use
versa
and
we
need
to
move
away
from
versa
and-
and
we
want
to
use
the
nmls.
B
H
Sorry,
I'm
sorry
samuel
lachlan
for
the
record.
We
are
it.
We
have
very
old
application
right
now
through
versa,
and
it
is
it's
outdated
and
we
need
to
have
an
updated
system.
B
H
A
H
H
H
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Seeing
no
one
here
in
carson
city
in
neutral,
no
one
on
zoom
can
we
go
to
the
phone
line.
A
Okay,
I
will
now
close
the
hearing
on
senate
bill
453.
Okay
members,
I
am
going
to
move
us
into
the
work
session
portion
of
our
bill
hearing.
We
have
three
bills
agendas
for
work
session,
but
we
might
consider
other
matters
previously
discussed
as
well.
I'm
going
to
hand
it
over
to
miss
pascal
of
thomas
members.
You
should
have
received
the
work
session
document
earlier
today.
It's
also
available
on
nellis
for
you,
ms
paslov
thomas,
do
you
want
to
start
us
off
with
senate
bill
55.
F
Thank
you.
Ma'am
chair
senate
bill
55
revises
provisions
governing
the
licensing
and
regulation
of
employee
leasing
companies.
It
was
sponsored
by
the
senate
committee
on
commerce
and
labor
on
behalf
of
the
division
of
industrial
relations
of
the
department
of
business
and
industry,
and
it
was
heard
on
may
24th
and
there
are
no
proposed
amendments.
A
Thank
you,
members.
Any
questions
on
senate
bill,
55!
That's
before
you,
okay,
seeing
none.
I
would
entertain
a
motion
to
do
pass.
I
have
a
do
pass
by
vice
chair.
Do
I
have
a
second?
I
have
a
second
by
assemblymember
floor.
Is
any
discussion
on
the
motion
before
you,
okay,
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
opposed.
A
A
F
Senate
bill
325
establishes
provisions
relating
to
preventing
the
acquisition
of
human
immunodeficiency
virus.
It
is
sponsored
by
senator
settlemyre.
It
was
heard
on
may
27th.
There
are
proposed
amendments
that
were
discussed
during
the
bill
hearing.
The
first
would
be
to
amend
section
1
of
the
bill
to
authorize
a
pharmacist
who
meets
the
requirements
prescribed
by
the
board
pursuant
to
subsection
2
to
administer,
as
well
as
prescribe
and
dispense
a
drug
described
in
subsection
1a
of
the
bill.
A
A
A
F
A
A
I
have
assembly
member
dickman
in
opposition
assembly,
member
o'neill
and
opposition
assembly
member
kasama
in
opposition
assemblymember
hardy
in
opposition
and
assembly
member
tolls
in
opposition
motion
carries.
I
will
assign
that
floor
statement
to
assemblymember
considine
at
this
time.
I
would
like
to
consider
the
two
bills
we
currently
we
heard
today.
I
would
like
to
start
by
considering
senate
bill
2
and
91.
F
I
Vice
chair
carlton
and
thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
I
I
think,
having
some
of
the
questions
answered
and
understanding
the
this
might
be
a
practice.
That's
out
there
right
now
and
someone
could
possibly
get
harmed
by
it
and
being
able
to
allow
the
board
of
cosmetology
to
make
sure
that
people
are
thoroughly
trained
thoroughly
licensed,
and
if
there
is
an
incident
there
is
is
someone
they
can
go
to
in
case
it
happens.
We
heard
that
people
are
doing
it
now.
I
So
I
think
it's
a
a
good
idea
to
make
sure
that
if
a
client
has
an
issue,
they
have
someone
they
can
go
to
in
the
future.
If
someone
is
practicing
out
of
their
scope
of
their
license,
that
there
needs
to
be
some
accountability
and
when
we
start
scraping
things
off
our
skin
and
piercing
the
skin
for
things,
I
I
think
we
want
to
be
very,
very
careful
to
make
sure
that
the
the
sanitation
is
taken
care
of
and
that
that
thoroughly
trained.
I
A
B
Thank
you,
chair
and,
and
maybe
along
the
lines
of
vice
chair,
more
of
a
comment
that
I
I
too
had
a
lot
of
initial
questions.
I'm
I
I
feel
more
comfortable,
knowing
there's
a
grandfather
clause
that
was
really
important
to
me
and
that
you
know
that
there's
not
an
another
license
fee.
It's
just
replaces
the
fee
for
a
standard
esthetician
and
that
the
exam
fee
is
is
also
standard,
so
I'll
be
a
yes
at
a
committee,
but
I
I
did
have
some
concerns
going
in
thanks.
A
G
G
So
I
equated
to
when
I
had
my
motorcycle,
I
had
a
driver's
license.
I
got
a
motorcycle
endorsement
when
I
didn't
have
to
pay
any
additional
fee
to
get
that
on
my
driver's
license
and
it's
a
it's
an
increased
ability
in
driving
on
the
street.
So
I
will
talk
with
senator
lang,
some
more
about
it
very
quickly.
A
And
mr
o'neal,
I
don't
know
if
we
have
mr
landry
on
here,
but
I'm
I'm
and
if
he
is
maybe
he
wants
to
step
in,
but
it
was
my
understanding
of
the
bill
that
it's
not
an
additional
license.
Either
you
have
an
esthetician
license
or
you
have
an
advanced
esthetician
license.
You
don't
have
to
have
both.
So
it's
just
oh
it's
just
one
fee.
A
G
A
Maybe
we
can
have
our
legal
clarify,
mr
quest,
if
you,
if
reading
through
senate
bill
291
the
the
language
as
as
the
third
reprint
states,
it's
just
either
an
esthetician
license
or
an
advanced
statistician
license.
It's
not
the
requirement
to
have
both.
J
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Sam
quest
community
council.
That's
correct
if
you
have
an
advanced
esthetician's
license
under
this
build
that
allows
you
to
practice
regular
aesthetics
or
advanced
aesthetics,
so
you
would
only
need
one
license
if
you
wanted
to
do
both
as
an
advanced
esthetician.
G
If
you
already
have
the
first,
whatever
you
want
to
call
it
the
first
first
level,
thank
you,
but
you
then
you
have
to
pay
for
the
second
level
license.
That's
that's
how
I'm
understanding
it.
J
Santa
claus
committee
council,
so
in
section
19,
there's
a
number
of
different
ways
to
go
about
getting
this
license.
If
you
are
an
advanced
esthetician,
if
you're
licensed
excuse
me
not
an
advanced
institution,
if
you're
a
licensed
esthetician,
you
can
get
300
additional
hours
of
training
in
this
advanced
ethician
curriculum.
J
That
would
be
one
way
to
go
about
it
or
if
you
were
not
a
licensed
advance.
A
licensed,
esthetician
subsection,
four
of
section
19
sets
forth
the
other
requirements,
so
you
could
complete
900
hours
of
training.
J
So
if
you
were
a
licensed
esthetician
and
you
got
the
new
300
hours
of
additional
training,
you
would
then
get
a
new
license
as
an
advanced
esthetician
and
your
old
license
as
an
esthetician
would
go.
G
A
A
B
Yeah
I'll,
be
yes
out
of
the
committee,
if
I
have
any
other
concerns
I'll
just
reserve,
my
right.
Thank
you.
Okay,
thank
you.
A
A
A
I
have
a
motion
from
assembly
member
o'neil
and
the
second
from
viceroy
carlton.
Now
do
you
have
any
questions
on
the
motion?
Okay,
members,
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
opposed.
I
okay
motion
carries.
I
will
assign
that
floor
statement
to
assembly
member
o'neill,
okay,
members
that
looks
like
that
is
our
committee
business.
A
I
Or-
and
thank
you,
madam
chair,
because
we
don't
know
if
we're
going
to
be
back
in
this
room
again
and
I
have
served
on
commerce
and
labor
since
1999
and
I've
worked
with
a
lot
of
really
great
people.
But
I
have
to
say
that
our
chair
has
done
a
fantastic
job
of
stepping
in
managing
very
complicated,
very
difficult
issues
across
the
spectrum,
from
scope
of
practice
to
financial,
to
real
estate,
to
all
the
turf
battles
that
are
out
there
in
this
building.
I
They
all
end
up
in
commerce
and
labor,
and
she
has
done
a
wonderful
job
in
managing
them,
and
I
could
not
have
done
that
good,
a
job
when
I
did
commerce
and
labor
the
first
time,
because
believe
me,
my
first
time
as
cheering
commerce
labor,
it
was
a
bit
of
a
mess.
So
but
it
was
in
the
senate.
I
hope
they're,
not
listening.
So
with
that.
I
just
wanted
to
congratulate
her
on
having
a
very
successful
session.
A
A
And-
and
vice
chair
stole
my
thunder
because
I
wanted
to
talk
about
how
long
she
had
served
on
this
committee,
but
it
was
really
easy
to
do
my
job
when
I
had
a
vice
chair
who
served
and
been
on
commerce
and
labor
for
24
years.
So
whenever
I
had
a
question,
I
could
really
lean
on
her
to
help
me
navigate
the
commerce
and
labor
process.
So
if
I
did
a
good
job
and
if
I
made
it
look
easy,
it
was
because
of
the
people,
the
staff
and
the
vice
chair
who
helped
me
through
it.