►
From YouTube: 5/14/2021 - Assembly Committee on Commerce and Labor
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
A
Here,
thank
you,
madam
secretary.
Please
mark
assemblywomanhardy
absent
excused.
Okay
members.
I
think
everyone
is
familiar
with
our
housekeeping
item,
so
I'm
just
going
to
go
ahead
and
skip
those
so
that
we
can
get
straight
into
our
agenda
items.
We
only
have
a
couple
items,
our
agenda,
work
session
and
public
comment
and
we
can
move
straight
into
our
work
session.
We
are
going
to
take
everything
in
order
with
the
exception
of
senate
bill
186.
A
C
Thank
you,
ma'am,
chair
marcy,
thomas
with
the
research
division.
The
first
bill
is
senate
bill
44
and
it
revises
provisions
governing
behavioral
health
professionals.
It
was
sponsored
by
the
senate
committee
on
commerce
and
labor
on
behalf
of
the
rural
regional
behavioral
health
policy
board.
There
are
five
proposed
amendments
by
senator
cochia
and
there
is
a
mockup
attached
behind
the
bill
pages.
This
mockup
is
different
than
the
one
that
was
referenced
during
the
committee
hearing.
C
The
fifth
proposed
amendment
amends
sections
3,
6,
12
and
24
of
the
bill
to
require
each
board
to
submit
the
specified
report
to
the
chair
of
each
regional
behavioral
health
policy
board
and
two
authorize
the
report
to
be
submitted
in
a
written
format,
and
the
final
proposed
amendment
is
to
delete
section
32
of
the
bill.
Thank
you.
B
A
Correct
and
we
did
get
that
section
removed.
I
shared
the
same
concerns
that
you
had
assembly
member
tolls
and
I
I,
when
I
submitted
the
request
to
our
legal
and
our
policy.
Analyst
too,
I
had
the
same
questions
when
I
saw
the
work
session
document
to
make
sure
that
all
the
sections
where
we
all
had
concerns
on
vice
chair,
carlton,
myself
and
you
were
taken
care
of.
A
A
A
C
Senate
bill
75
revises
provisions
relaying
to
unemployment
compensation.
It
was
sponsored
by
the
senate
committee
on
commerce
and
labor
on
behalf
of
the
department
of
employment,
training
and
rehabilitation.
It
was
heard
on
may
12th.
There
are
four
proposed
amendments
which
were
discussed
during
the
bill
hearing.
The
first
is
by
dieter,
and
that
would
be
to
amend
section
5.5
of
the
bill
to
replace
the
united
states
department
of
labor
with
federal
law.
C
John
pirro,
with
the
clark
county,
public
defender's
office
and
kendra
burchie,
also
with
the
washoe
county
public
defender's
office,
proposed
the
third
and
fourth
amendment,
and
that
would
be
to
require
the
administrator
to
in
response
to
a
request
from
a
court
official
with
subpoena
authority
and
in
compliance
with
federal
law,
furnish
certain
information
concerning
persons
who
receive
benefits
for
use
in
the
selection
of
trial
jurors.
In
section
three,
and
the
fourth
is
to
delete
section
19
of
the
bill.
A
A
Any
seconds:
okay,
okay!
I
have
a
second
by
the
first
by
vice
chair
in
a
second
by
assemblymember
martinez.
Any
discussion
on
the
motion.
Okay,
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
opposed
okay
motion
carries.
I
will
assign
that
floor
statement
to
assembly
member
martinez.
C
A
A
C
Senate
bill
179
revises
provisions
relating
to
sign
language
interpreting
and
real-time
captioning.
It
was
sponsored
by
the
senate
committee
on
commerce
and
labor
on
behalf
of
the
legislative
committee
on
senior
citizens,
veterans
and
adults
with
special
needs.
It
was
heard
on
may
12
and
there
is
one
proposed
amendment
by
the
clark
county
school
district
and
that
is
to
amend
section
18
of
the
bill
to
change
the
expiration
date
of
a
provisional
registration
issue.
Pursuant
to
this
section
from
july
1st
2024
to
july
1st
2026.
A
A
C
A
A
A
C
Senate
bill
184
revises
provisions
reeling
to
the
practice
of
medicine.
It
is
sponsored
by
senator
hardy.
It
was
heard
on
may
3rd.
There
is
one
proposed
amendment
by
the
chair
and
that
is
to
delete
sections
2
and
24
of
the
bill,
which
authorizes
the
board
of
medical
examiners
in
the
state
board
of
osteopathic
medicine,
to
issue
a
license
to
practice,
medicine
or
licensed
practice,
osteopathic
medicine
respectively
to
certain
persons.
A
A
C
A
D
A
Thank
you,
assemblymember
dickman
members.
Anyone
else.
Okay,
I
have
a
first
by
speaker.
Fryerson
is
a
men
in
due
pass
to
amend
and
do
pass.
I
have
a
second
by
assembly
member
considine,
any
discussion
on
the
motion.
Okay
members,
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
opposed
hey.
Okay,
I
have
a
name
by
advisor
carlton
and
a
nay
by
assembly.
Member
dickman,
a
motion
carries.
I
will
assign
that
floor
statement
to
assemblymember
considine.
C
A
Thank
you,
ms
pascal
thomas
and
before
I
go
to
members
for
questions
on
the
bill.
I
know
I
got
my
question
answered
by
I'm,
assuming
just
to
put
this
on
the
record.
It
was
my
request
that,
and
vice
chair
is
concerned
too,
that
we
add
the
feast
to
statue.
I
know
we
only
see
some
fees
listed
here,
but
the
amendment
that
was
requested
would
require
that
all
of
their
fees
be
in
nrs,
correct.
A
A
A
C
A
C
A
A
B
Ahead,
thank
you,
chair,
and
I
was
looking
for
amendment
on
the
very
last
sentence
in
this
bill
in
senate
bill
247,
because
that
was
the
one.
We
asked
some
questions
about
and
had
some
concerns.
I
still
have
some
concerns,
even
though
I
appreciated
the
discussion.
So,
for
those
reasons
I'm
going
to
be
voting
now.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
You
members
any
other
discussion.
Okay,
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
opposed.
Will
the
nays
please
raise
their
hand.
I
have
assembly
member
o'neal
assembly,
member
kasama
assembly
member
dickman,
an
assembly
member
told,
as
a
name
motion
carries.
I
will
assign
that
floor
statement
to
vice
chair
carlton.
C
C
There
is
one
proposed
amendment
by
paul
klein
and
that
is
to
amend
subsection
1g
of
section
5
and
subsection
1g
of
section
11
to
delete
the
requirement
that,
in
order
to
deny
a
claim
for
which
prior
authorization
was
granted
because
the
insurer
was
not
eligible
to
receive
the
dental
care
for
which
the
claim
was
made,
the
dental,
insurer
or
administrator
must
not
have
known
of
the
eligibility
status
of
the
insured
and
could
not
have
discovered
the
eligibility
status
of
the
insured
through
reasonable
care.
Thank
you.
D
Vice
chair,
thank
you
and,
and
thank
you,
madam
chair,
this.
This
amendment
reads
a
little
wonky,
but
I
believe
it
actually
gets
to
the
point.
The
committee
had
concerns
about
folks
going
in
eligibility
and
prior
authorization
are
not
necessarily
the
same
thing
they're,
not
all
in
real
time.
So
I
think
this
is
addresses
the
issue
to
make
sure
that
the
dental
practitioner
knows
the
rules
of
the
road
and
the
patient
knows
the
rules
of
the
road
when
they
go
in
to
get
these
procedures
taken
care
of.
A
A
C
A
Members,
any
just
any
questions
on
senate
bill
289,
seeing
none,
I
would
look
for
a
motion.
Should
you
pass,
I
have
a
motion.
Should
you
pass
from
vice
chair
carlton?
Do
I
have
a
second?
I
have
a
second
from
assemblymember
considine,
any
discussion
on
the
motion.
A
C
A
A
C
Senate
bill
307
revises
provisions
related
to
the
sale
of
alcoholic
beverages.
This
is
sponsored
by
senator
john
darrell
loop
and
it
was
heard
on
may
10th.
There
are
several
amendments.
Mr
alonzo
proposes
the
first
five
which
are
attached.
C
Second,
amid
subsection
9
of
section
3
of
the
bill
to
remove
the
provisions
prohibiting
a
supplier
from
requiring
a
host
wholesaler
to
keep
a
certain
minimum
inventory,
instead
prohibit
a
supplier
from
requiring
a
wholesaler
to
make
payment
for
the
purchase
of
any
malt
beverage
until
at
least
seven
days
after
the
delivery
or
under
the
terms
of
the
credit
policy.
Whichever
is
greater,
provide
an
exception
from
this
prohibition
for
situations
involving
a
wholesaler
who
has
failed
to
make
a
payment
to
the
supplier.
C
Fourth
is
to
amend
subsection
13
of
section
3
of
the
bill
to
delete
the
specified
prohibition
concerning
payment
terms
between
the
wholesaler
and
the
supplier.
Instead,
it
prohibits
a
supplier
from
failing
to
one
pay,
a
wholesaler
for
invoices
or
claims
for
reimbursement
within
30
days
after
approval
by
the
supplier
or
to
approve
or
disapprove
such
invoices
or
claims
within
30
days
after
received.
C
The
fifth
is
to
amend
section
7
of
the
bill
to
provide
the
provisions
concerning
the
unlawful
possession
sailor,
transportation
of
liquor
set
forth
and
subsection
1
do
not
apply
to
licensed
original
package
retailers
or
their
delivery
support
services,
while
acting
in
their
professional
capacities
to
deliver
to
consumers.
Liquor
that
the
original
package,
retail
liquor
store,
purchased
from
a
state
licensed
wholesaler
and
within
the
retail
liquor
store
licensee's
jurisdiction.
C
A
Thank
you,
ms
pascal
thomas
members,
questions
on
the
bill
before
you.
We
will
start
with
assemblymember
tolls.
B
Okay,
I'm
gonna
try
and
make
vice
chair
proud
of
my
humor
here,
but
if
whiskey
is
for
drinking
and
water
is
for
fighting,
then
wine
is
for
making
you
dizzy,
because
this
this
amendment
is
certainly
has
a
lot
going
on,
and
I
am
very
appreciative
of
the
I
know,
particularly
a
certain
mead
distributor
that
is
excited
about
the
pieces
in
senator
gokuchi's
amendments
and
there's
some
pieces
that
I
really
like
in
these
amendments.
B
Unfortunately,
though,
I
have
some
real
concerns
about
the
invoices
and
some
of
the
specific
transactions
and
ways
the
added
language
in
this
amendment.
That,
unfortunately,
has
caused
me
to
have
to
be
a
no,
but
I
will
reserve
my
rights,
certainly
if
we
can
work
that
out,
because
I'd
like
to
be
a
yes,
but
I'm,
unfortunately,
I'm
a
no
thank
you.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
procedurally,
where
we
are.
If
we
consider
this
without
the
amendments,
then
that's
the
end
of
the
conversation,
and
so
I
think
from
a
procedural
standpoint,
there
are
some
unresolved
questions.
D
You
chair,
yeah,
there's
so
much
of
this
bill
that
I
I
really
like.
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
good
things.
I
I
am
concerned
with
restricting
the
ability
to
check
credit
worthiness
of
somebody
when
you're
extending
credit,
which
I
think
is
fairly
common
for
businesses
and
so
unfortunately
I'll
be
a
no
at
this
time
with
right
to
reserve
to
change
on
the
floor.
Thank
you.
Assembly.
D
Thank
you
chair.
I
I
find
this
amendment
and
this
whole
thing
kind
of
confusing.
I
think
I'm
saying
something
about
putting
mandatory
credit
in
statute.
I'm
not
sure
I
like
that,
but
at
this
point
I'm
going
to
be
a
yes
reserve,
because,
especially
I,
like
the
wine
part.
Thank
you.
D
Vice
chair
carl
carlton,
and
thank
you
and-
and
I
understand
where
some
of
the
concerns
are,
but
when
you
have
to
have
a
mandatory
stock,
when
you
do
business
with
these
folks,
they
tell
you
how
much
you
have
to
buy
in
no
other
business.
Does
your
vendor
tell
you,
you
must
buy
300
cases
of
this
200
cases?
Well,
it's
not
fair
to
mandate
how
much
you
have
to
buy
and
not
give
you
the
credit
to
do
it.
D
So
to
me,
that's
a
two-way
street,
so
I
understand
where
some
of
the
concerns
are,
but
you
know
whenever
this
legislature
gets
involved
in
the
three-tier
system,
and
these
these
guys
things
always
get
a
little
a
little
bit
confusing,
but
they
don't
operate
like
any
other
business
does
in
this
state
for
a
reason,
because
we
put
in
safeguards
for
it.
So
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
a
level
playing
field
for
everyone,
and
I
want
to
thank
senator
gokuchiya
for
his
hard
work.
D
He
had
to
really
talk
a
lot
to
convince
me
to
take
some
of
these
amendments
and
it's
just
because
it
was
him.
Am
I
doing
this?
Otherwise,
I
would
not
have
gone
down
this
road,
so
whoever
benefits
from
this
thank
senator
gokuchiya
for
it,
because
he
worked
his
butt
off
convincing
me
to
support
this
bill.
A
I'm
gonna
ditto
the
amendment
from
what
my
vice
chair
said.
Senator
gokachia
fought
a
good
fight,
okay
assembly
member
o'neill.
D
A
Okay,
I
would
look
for
a
motion
to
amend
and
do
pass.
I
have
a
first
by
vice
chair
carlton,
a
second
by
assemblymember
martinez,
any
discussion
on
the
motion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
opposed
well.
The
nays
raised
their
hand.
I
have
a
name
from
assembly
member
o'neill
assembly
member
kasama,
assemblymember
tolls
motion
carries.
I
will
take
that
floor
statement.
C
Senate
bill
320
enacts
various
provisions
relating
to
food
delivery
service
platforms.
It
is
sponsored
by
senator
neil
and
there
are
it
was
heard
on
april
30th.
There
are
four
proposed
amendments
and
the
first
is
to
amend
the
definition
of
food
delivery
service
platform
in
section
4
of
the
bill.
The
second
is
to
amend
subsection
1c
of
section
16
to
delete
the
requirement
that
the
specified
statement
included
disclosure
of
the
average
commission.
C
Dispensing
establishment
and
three
provide
that
the
provisions
of
the
section
do
not
preempt
any
local
ordinance
which
places
limits
on
the
maximum
commission
that
may
be
charged.
So
such
ordinance
was
in
effect
before
april
30th,
2021
and
finally
amend
the
effect
date
of
the
bill
to
upon
passage
and
approval.
A
A
A
You're
welcome,
assemblymember,
and
I
know
you
were
a
big
fan
of
that
bill.
Okay,
okay
members.
We
are
going
to
revisit
senate
bill
186.
It
does
not
look
like
the
senate
has
adjourned
floor.
Yet
so
we
are
going
to
go
ahead
and
take
senate
bill
186
and
ms
pazlov
thomas.
C
Thank
you,
ma'am,
chair
senate
bill
186
revises
provisions
relating
to
collection
agencies.
It
was
sponsored
by
the
senate
committee
on
commerce
and
labor
and
heard
on
may
10th.
There
are
three
proposed
amendments
by
senator
spearman.
The
first
is
to
provide
that
if
a
homeowner's
association
uses
a
foreclosure
process,
the
home
may
not
be
sold
to
one
any
person
who
is
involved
in
the
foreclosure
process,
including
without
limitation.
C
Any
person
who
is
involved
in
the
foreclosure
process
means
any
person
who
exercised
discretion
in
any
decision
relating
to
the
foreclosure
of
a
lien
and
any
person
employed
by
such
a
person.
The
second
proposed
amendment
requires
an
hoa
to
send
its
notices
and
communications
by
mail
and
to
the
electronic
mail
address
designated
by
a
unit's
owner.
C
B
I
was
waiting
for
the
vice
chair
because
I
thought
maybe
she
would
ask
a
question
about
it
too,
but
in
regards
to
the
portal
and
the
website.
Okay,
so
it's
as
I
read
it,
it's
my
understanding
that
it
is
mandatory
to
have
either
a
website
or
a
portal
for
communities
with
over
150
units,
but
then
it
is
encouraged
to
create
such
a
website
or
a
portal.
So
if
I
could
just
get
a
little
bit
more
clarity
around
that,
that
would
be
appreciated.
A
Yes
and
it's
it's
encouraged,
and
I
believe,
if
I
read
it
correctly,
it
was
the
encouraged
was
for
those
who
have
150
or
less
so
mandatory
with
for
those
with
150
or
more
and
encouraged
for
those
with
150
or
less.
If,
if
you
guys
look
at
this
work
session
document,
compare
it
to
what
was
originally
proposed
at
the
hearing
earlier
this
week,
it
had
originally
been
for
hoas,
with
a
hundred
homes
or
less
and
in
working
with
the
industry
partners
in
order
to
bring
them
into
a
neutral
position.
B
Wonderful
thank
you
chair,
and
then
I
knew
there
was
a
little
bit
of
concern
around
section
one
with
the
requirements
of
gathering
that
reporting
data,
but
it's
my
understanding
that
those
hoas
would
already
have
that
information.
This
is
really
just
sending
it
to
somewhere
so
that
we
can
review
it
correct.
A
A
I
have
a
second
by
assemblymember
marzola,
any
discussion
on
the
motion.
Okay,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
opposed.
I
have
an
opposition
from
assembly
member
kasama
and
assembly
member
dickman
motion
carries.
I
will
assign
that
floor
statement
to
assembly
member
carlton,
okay,
members.
Thank
you
guys
all
so
much.
I
know
this
was
a
long
work
session.
I
appreciate
you
all
being
here.
I
want
to
thank
our
staff
for
getting
us
through
yet
another
deadline.
So
thank
you.
Everyone,
the
last
item
on
our
agenda.
A
A
Okay
members,
thank
you
for
your
patience
we
are
going
to
take,
even
though
we
are
going
to
stand
in
recess,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
take
public
comment
now,
so
that
if
we
do
not
need
to
meet
to
adjourn,
we
have
fulfilled
our
obligation
and
taken
public
comment.
So
we've
given
time
for
those
who
are
listening
over
the
internet
to
call
in
I'm
going
to
ask
broadcasting
if
there
is
anyone
in
queue
to
give
public
comment.