►
From YouTube: 3/16/2021 - Assembly Committee on Education
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
Great
thank
you
and
welcome
to
the
assembly
committee
on
education.
Will
the
secretary
please
call
roll.
B
D
D
E
A
Here
so
we
have
all
members
present,
so
we
do
have
a
quorum
welcome
to
all
of
those
who
are
viewing
online
or
through
our
youtube
channel
and
to
those
participating
by
video
or
phone.
Before
we
begin,
I
just
want
to
do
a
few
housekeeping
announcements.
A
If
you
have
not
done
so
already,
please
make
sure
to
mute
your
microphone
when
you're,
not
speaking
to
minimize
background
noise
committee
members.
Please
keep
your
camera
on
for
the
duration
of
the
meeting,
so
we
can
ensure
a
quorum
is
present.
We
do
expect
courtesy
and
respect
in
this
committee.
We
don't
always
agree
in
policy,
but
we
need
to
be
respectful
of
each
other
in
the
legislative
process.
A
All
media
materials
can
be
accessed
on
the
committee's
webpage
on
nellis
and
a
reminder
for
those
watching
online
in
this
virtual
world
we
do
have
several
screens
going
at
once.
So
if
you
see
members
looking
away
they're
likely
looking
at
material
or
exhibits
for
the
committee,
we
have
two
bills
today
we
will
be
taking
them
in
reverse
order
for
the
bill.
A
Hearing
this
afternoon
I
have
allocated
equal
time
for
testimony
and
support
opposition
in
neutral
each
person,
providing
testimony
will
be
allowed
a
maximum
of
two
minutes
staff
will
time
each
speaker
to
ensure
everyone
is
given
an
equal
opportunity
to
speak,
and
speakers
are
urged
to
avoid
repetition
of
comments
made
by
previous
speakers,
we'll
limit
the
overall
length
of
each
testimony
to
about
30
minutes.
If
you
wish
to
testify
and
have
not
done
so
already,
please
register
online
through
the
link
provided
on
the
agenda
for
the
meeting
upon
successful
registration.
A
A
You
may
also
submit
public
comment
in
writing
either
in
addition
to
or
in
lieu
of
testimony,
if
you
do
not
want
to
testify,
but
you
do
want
to
give
your
opinion
on
the
bill.
You
may
register
and
it'll
show
your
interest
in
a
particular
bill.
The
chair,
or
members
of
the
committee
may
request
testifiers
to
submit
documentation
supporting
their
testimony.
A
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair
bill,
barry
axerrad,
f,
vice
chair
miller
and
all
of
the
members
of
the
education
committee
for
allowing
me
to
be
here
today
for
the
record.
My
name
is
vinisha
considine
and
I
have
the
privilege
of
representing
district
18
down
in
clark
county.
I
am
here
today
to
present
ab215.
F
F
This
bill
simply
adds
another
option
for
a
small
segment
of
students
who
complete
or
attend
four
years
of
high
school,
but
are
credit
deficient
so,
instead
of
me
explaining
this
bill,
I
would
like
to
turn
this
over
to
miss
shive,
since
this
was
her
her
bill
to
begin
with
that,
she
brought
it
to
me
to
explain
the
bill.
I
do
want
to
say
that
there
is
one
small
amendment
that
was
requested
of
us,
which
I
will
talk
about
after
her
presentation.
F
So
if
it's
okay
with
the
chair
chairwoman,
if
we
can
turn
it
over
to
mrs
schutt
great.
G
Thank
you,
chair,
bilbray,
axelrod
and
vice
chair
miller,
as
well
as
the
rest
of
the
education
committee.
My
name
is
leilani
shive
and
I'm
here
to
discuss
ab215
with
you,
I'm
an
assistant
principal
at
sunrise,
mountain
high
school
and
I'm
also
an
evening
site
supervisor
for
adult
education.
I've
been
doing
that
since
approximately
2013-1514
school
year
about
seven
years.
G
I
brought
this
concern
to
assemblywoman
considine,
because
it's
something
that's
been
an
issue
every
year.
The
problem
is
that
every
year
we
have
students
that
contact
us
and
they
ask
you
know
what
do
I
need
to
do
to
finish
my
diploma.
Of
course,
we
look
at
the
transcript
first
to
see
how
many
credits
they
need
determine
which
program
is
in
their
best
interest.
G
G
A
Thank
you
very
much
for
that
testimony.
Do
we
have
any
questions
from
the
committee?
I'm
not
seeing
any
in
the
chat.
Looking
around?
Oh,
I
see.
Assemblywoman
taurus
has
a
question.
A
H
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
miss
scheiber
for
the
presentation.
I
appreciate
it
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
there's
any
safeguards
in
this
legislation,
that'll
prove
counselors
from
essentially
like
encouraging
kids
to
move
on
what
I've
noticed
in
teaching
and
teaching
is
that
sometimes
we
know
that
a
student
might
not
be
on
track
to
graduate,
and
I
hear
that
there
might
be
they
might
be
ill-advised
to
just
transfer
over
to
adult
ed.
H
And
you
know,
as
you
and
I
know,
the
graduation
rate
is
not
quite
as
high,
so
I
just
want
to
see
if
there's
any
safeguards
in
place
or
if
there's
been
consideration
of
safeguards
in
place
to
ensure
that
they're
not
advised
to
transfer
in
the
middle
of
their
senior
year
or
their
junior
year.
G
That's
a
great
question:
assemblywoman
torres
the
wording
in
the
bill
itself
says
that
they
have
to
have
com.
You
know
finished.
Basically,
they
have
to
have
attended
four
years
of
high
school,
so
it
would
be
at
the
end
of
their
senior
year.
They
could
not
be
encouraged
to
go
early,
we're
not
trying
to
take
students
from
the
general
high
schools,
we're
just
trying
to
give
those
the
opportunity
to
finish
who
have.
You
know
already
attended
four
years
of
high
school
and
not
earned
their
diploma.
A
You're
good
assemblywoman
torres,
okay,
thank
you
and
thank
you
for
that
clarification.
I
I
know
that
we
do
want
our
students
to
stay
in
high
school
for
the
four
years,
but
we
do
want
to
make
sure
they're
whole
and-
and
this
is
a
great
option,
so
thank
you
for
bringing
this
bill
assemblywoman
constantine.
You
mentioned
that.
Is
there
a
conceptual
amendment?
I
didn't
see
one,
but
I
thought
that
you
might
have
said
that.
F
Yes,
madam
chair,
so
we
received
a
request
from
the
education
services
division,
alternative
services
to
change
the
wording
in
subsection
two
from
completed
to
attended.
So
the
statement
is
is
at
least
17
years
of
age
and
has
completed
at
least
four
years
of
high
school.
The
request
was
to
change
that
to
attended
so
that
attended,
more
reflects
what
the
student
had.
What
has
happened
with
the
student
is
that
they
have
attended
those
four
years
completed
might
imply
that
they
actually
finished
high
school,
which
might
have
a
conflict.
F
So
I
can
have
that
drafted
and
sent
that
over
to
you
today,
but
that
is
the
only
conceptual
amendment
to
this
bill.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
explaining
that.
Okay,
I'm
not
seeing
any
other
questions
from
our
committee,
so
I
will
go
ahead
and
begin
testimony
and
support.
Please
remember
to
clearly
state
and
spell
your
name
and
limit
your
testimony
to
two
minutes
or
as
close
to
as
possible
staff
from
bps.
Please
add
the
first
caller.
C
C
D
Afternoon,
my
name
is
lisa
rasmussen,
r-a-s-m-u-s-f-e-n
and
I'm
here
to
testify,
on
behalf
of
nevada
attorneys
for
criminal
justice
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
committee
nacj
supports
this
legislation
and
this
bill,
because
we
believe
that
it's
an
appropriate
mechanism
to
address
the
issue
with
inmates,
so
we're
in
support.
I
I
don't
think
I
saw
any
proposed
amendments,
but
I've
heard
what
you're
discussing,
and
I
don't
think
that
we
have
any
issue
with
that,
so
we
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
we
all
support
it.
D
A
You
thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
rasmus.
It's
nice
to
hear
you
in
education
committee
and
we
do
not
have
that
amendment
up
on
nellis
yet,
but
we
will
have
it
as
soon
as
possible.
Next,
caller.
C
I
I
Ms
ive
covered
every
bullet
point
that
I
would
have
to
say,
but
we
definitely
want
to
strike
while
the
iron
is
hot
for
students
who
have
completed
four
years
of
high
school
but
have
not
hit
the
threshold
they
need.
So
I
think
changing
this
language
to
allow
these
students
to
hop
right
into
their
adult
diploma
instead
of
being
forced
to
go
through
the
high
set
or
ged
route
would
be
extremely
beneficial
for
our
students
in
need.
I
C
B
A-N-D-E-R-S-O-N,
on
behalf
of
the
washoe
county
school
district,
the
washoe
county
school
district
in
support
of
8215,
we
appreciate
the
bill
sponsor
for
reaching
out
to
us
long
before
the
session
even
started
to
float
this
concept
and
allow
our
staff
to
weigh
in.
We
do
allow
17
year
olds
to
enter
our
adult
ed
program
right
now,
under
the
premise
that,
by
the
time
they
finish,
they'll
be
18..
B
We
do
make
it
available
as
the
very
last
option.
We
want
to
work
hard
to
ensure
that
students
and
their
families
understand
the
implications
of
adult
ed
versus
a
traditional
high
school
diploma,
and
these
students
that
do
opt
into
the
adult
ed
program
are
considered
non-graduates
for
their
cohort
and
as
for
state
accountability,
measures
for
graduates,
they
do
not
graduate
with
their
class,
and
so
they
are
considered
non-graduate.
B
C
C
A
Thank
you.
Next,
we
will
hear
testimony
in
opposition
of
ab215.
Is
there
anyone
on
the
line
to
testify
in
opposition.
C
C
A
Thank
you.
I
am
going
to
give
you
the
option
if
you
want
to
say
something
in
closing,
but
with
no
opposition
testimony
you
might
want
to
just
move
on.
F
Well,
if
I
may
just
take
a
moment
and
thank
those
who
called
and
support-
and
I
want
to
thank
miss
shive
and
just
reiterate-
that
this
is
just
another
option-
to
help
a
segment
of
our
young
adults
who
may
be
working
during
the
pandemic,
who
may
find
themselves
in
a
situation
where
the
other
options
don't
work,
and
this
one
is
a
better
way
to
work
and
they
still
have
that
urge
to
complete
their
high
school
diploma.
So
I
appreciate
this
becoming
an
option
for
them.
Thank
you.
F
F
So
this
bill
with
the
proposed
amendment.
There
is
an
amendment
it's
on
nellis
and
I
will
be
talking
more
about
the
amendment
than
the
original
language
that
was
added
to
the
bill.
It
strengthens
laws
for
students
who
are
recruited
by
and
enroll
in
private
post-secondary
education
institutions,
also
known
as
private
for-profit
schools.
F
Over
the
past
several
years,
we've
seen
multiple
for-profit
change,
schools
and
colleges
close
and
leave
students
without
the
promised
education
and
poorer
than
they
began.
At
the
same
time,
with
the
economic
downturn,
the
pandemic
is
driving
higher
education
online
recently
loosened
regulations
that
have
happened
in
the
past
four
years
for
for-profit
institutions
and
enrollment
in
private,
post-secondary
education
and
schools,
and
colleges
is
increasing
nation
nationwide,
particularly
among
those
29
years
and
older
female
and
part-time
students.
F
Many
people,
including
those
in
our
community,
believe
right
now
that
their
jobs
are
not
coming
back
and
private
for-profit
institutions
advertise
a
faster
way
to
obtain
education
and
training
in
a
new
career,
often
with
promises
of
job
placement
upon
completion,
private
for-profit
institutions
typically
underperform,
compared
to
their
peer
institutions.
Nationwide
studies
consistently
have
shown
that
private
institutions
are
less
likely
to
graduate
students
are
less
likely
to
graduate
and
more
likely
to
pay
higher
tuition
costs
compared
to
public
institutions.
F
F
I
would
like
to
go
over
the
amendment,
because
this
is
this
is
really
the
the
largest
portion
of
the
bill,
but
before
I
do
that,
I
do
want
to
thank
the
commission
on
post-secondary
education
and
the
people
that
I
have
spoken
with
over
the
past
few
years.
I'm
sorry
a
few
weeks
to
really
make
sure
that
this
bill
both
protects
students
but
does
also
allow
students
who
are
looking
for
training
in
the
post-secondary
post-secondary
institutions
to
to
be
able
to
obtain
that
that
education
as
well.
F
F
So
if
you
would,
if
you'd
like,
I
am
happy
to
go
through
each
section
of
the
amendment
and
explain
why
some
of
these
have
been
included.
F
So
in
section
a
where
the
original
change
in
the
language
ob
section
one
subsection
one
a.
I
am
removing
the
original
language.
That
is,
that
is
there,
but
also
adding
at
the
end
of
subsection,
a
where
it
says
the
institution
shall
refund
a
student
all
of
the
money.
The
student
has
paid
just
adding
absent
situations
where
occupational
requirements
change
where
some
schools
I've
learned
during,
let's
say
a
two-year
course,
an
18-month
course.
The
expectations
from
employers
have
changed.
F
So
there
are
some
occupational
requirements
that
have
changed
that
absent
situations
where
occupational
requirements
change
substantially
fail
to
furnish,
includes
the
canceling
or
changing
of
a
program
without
meeting
the
requirements
of
the
regulations
nac394610,
and
that
is
more
or
less
not
to
punish
the
good
actors.
F
It
is
that
we
have
seen-
and
there
has
been
a
history
of
bad
actors,
post-secondary
institutions
that
pop
up
that
are
unlicensed,
that
are
kind
of
hard
to
track
down.
So
this
is
just
to.
You
know,
make
sure
that
regulations
can
be
changed
to
match
any
situations.
F
This
particular
section,
if
passed
as
it
is,
will
conflict
with
the
regulations,
and
I
do
want
to
work
with
the
commission
for
post-secondary
education
and
change
those
regulations
so
that
these
both
align.
F
The
reason
for
this
portion
of
it
is,
I
have
learned
that
there
are
some
enrollment
agreements,
which
is
essentially
the
contract
that
the
student
signs
with
the
institution
that
are
in
six
point
font
that
are
seven
or
eight
pages
long
that
are
full
of
legal
ease
and
that
it
is
recognized
that
a
lot
of
students
don't
necessarily
read
that
enrollment
agreement,
so
adding
language
that
each
provision
of
the
agreement
is
reviewed
with
the
student,
I
think
not
only
as
the
education
to
the
institution
but
puts
forward.
F
You
know
straightforward
with
the
student
to
go
over
exactly
what
they're
agreeing
to
and
also
what
what
their
expectations
are
and
what
the
institutions
expectations
are.
F
In
addition
to
add
to
the
enrollment
agreement,
a
statement
that
they
I'm
sorry
so
to
add
to
the
statute
that
institutions
shall
not
permit
personnel
to
engage
in
recruiting
activities
where
protective
students
cannot
reasonably
be
expected
to
make
informed
and
considered
enrollment
decisions.
F
The
expectation
for
this
is
that
the
regulations
will
will
put
out
some
of
those
areas
where
those
areas
would
be
so,
let's
say
right
outside
of
a
welfare
office
or
near
a
homeless.
Shelter
don't
want
to
put
a
defined
list
of
those
within
statute
when
they
could
be
more
defined
or
explained
in
the
regulations
and
changed
as
as
needed.
F
An
institution,
however,
can
engage
in
recruiting
activities
at
employment.
Opportunity
centers
under
government
auspices,
provided
the
institution
has
permission
so
want
to
make
sure
that
that
institutions
can
still
go
and
recruit
in
places
just
in
making
sure
that
they're
places
where
there
is
a
less
less
of
a
chance
for
someone
who
can
fall
for
something
that
they
are
not
necessarily
financially
or
stability,
wise
able
to
complete
a
long
program
also
to
provide
each
applicant
with
a
complete
and
current
catalog
and
an
opportunity
to
review
the
catalog
prior
to
signing
and
signing
the
enrollment
agreement.
F
This
is
just
sort
of
typical
consumer
protection
language
so
that
the
student
can
take
the
catalog
home
can
review.
It
has
some
time
to
go
through
all
the
paperwork
without
feeling
like
they
need
to
sign
on
the
bottom
line
immediately
if
they
are
unsure.
You
know
if
this
is
the
career
path
that
they
want
to
go
to
go
through,
that
they
have
some
time
to
to
consider
it
and
balance
it
out
with
everything
else,
that's
going
on
with
their
lives.
F
It
has
to
start
with
the
school
the
advisor
and
go
all
the
way
up
until
if
something
isn't
resolved,
then
they
can
go
to
the
commission
on
post-secondary
education,
and
I
also
putting
enrollment
agreements
in
no
smaller
than
10
point
font.
F
I
think
that
they
should
be
readable
and
then
enrollments
agreements
again,
as
I
mentioned
before,
having
a
three-day
cancellation
policy
with
clear
language
explaining
how
a
potential
student
can
can
cancel
within
those
three
days,
that's
sort
of
the
whole
bill.
The
amendments,
the
reasoning
for
those
amendments,
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions
and
thank
you
for
for
allowing
me
to
present
the
bill.
A
Thank
you
assemblywoman.
I
know
for
someone
whose
eyesight
has
deteriorated
over
this
pandemic.
I
definitely
appreciate
the
no
smaller
than
10
points
for
for
the
language.
I
did
want
to
ask-
and
this
might
be
just
my
judiciary,
brain
going,
but
the
three-day
cancellation
policy
should
we
spell
out
that
that's
three
business
days.
Should
we
keep
it
as
calendar
days?
Should
we
possibly
since
you're
amending
it
anyways?
Maybe
we
should
spell
that
out
you're
amendable
to
that.
A
Yes,
but
thank
you,
I'm
gonna
say
for
doing
you
I
I
know
we've
had
many
conversations
about
your
bills
and
and
clearly
you've
you've
done
the
work.
So
thank
you
for
that.
I
think
we
have
a
question
from
vice
chair
miller,.
J
Thank
you
chair
and
thank
you
assemblywoman
for
for
bringing
this
legislation
forward.
You
know,
as
you
stated,
oftentimes
these
for-profit
schools.
J
I
I
don't
want
to
diminish
any
student
or
any
person
who
wants
to
advance
in
their
training
or
education,
but
we
know
that
sometimes
decisions
to
attend
these
schools
are
based
on
the
promise
to
get
through
it
quicker
than
other
training,
programs
or
colleges,
and
also
you
know,
just
easier
to
be
accepted
and
and
so
with
lower
grade
points
or
lower
requirements,
and
so
people
feel
that
this
is.
You
know
what
I
can
do
at
this
point.
J
J
They
showed
up
the
next
day
and
all
the
doors
were
locked,
and
so
I
appreciate
that
your
bill
brings
from
giving
the
student
more
education
more
discussion.
I
think
all
of
our
everyone
in
higher
ed
needs
this
to
really
understand
what
they're
committing
to
and
what
they're
getting
into
financially.
J
But
it
was
there
any
consideration
giving
to
when
the
onus
is
actually
on
the
school,
because
this
seems
like
when
decisions
are
made
from
the
student.
But
what
about?
In
those
cases
where?
Okay,
maybe
it's
not
as
common,
that
the
school
just
shuts
their
doors?
But
we
know
in
higher
end
often
it's
you
know
the
class
is
canceled.
They
don't
provide
the
class
anymore.
J
We
saw
some
some
very
unimpressive
policies
that
were
attempted
when,
when
everything
physically
shut
down
for
covid-
and
so
I'm
just
wondering-
was
there
anything
there
where
the
onus
is
put
on
the
actual
institute
to
provide
refunds
and
and
make
right
with
the
students.
F
So,
thank
you
very
much
vice
chair
miller,
for
for
the
question
through
madam
chair,
through
to
vice
chair
miller,
again
for
the
record,
this
is
vinicia
considine,
so
the
bill
did
start
out
with
the
language
that
was
a
little
bit
more
consistent
with
with
students
getting
refunds
after
extensive
talks
with
the
commission
on
post-secondary
education,
the
current
law
would
fulfill
the
original
language
that
I
that
I
wanted
to
add
to
this
bill.
F
So
what
I'm
doing
is
I'm
consistently
working
with
the
commission
on
post
seconds
post
secondary
education
to
to
see
where
we
can
make
some
areas
stronger?
F
F
What
I
have
learned
is
that
a
lot
of
the
schools
that
I've
personally
heard
about,
I
don't
want
to
call
it
any
like
makeup
or
hair
schools
or,
or
you
know,
sort
of
sort
of
some
of
those
either
don't
necessarily
fall
under
the
commission
for
post-secondary
education
or
they
are
schools
that
pop
up
and
close
down
and
then
pop
up
and
close
down.
They
change
their
name.
F
F
I
hope
that
sort
of
answers
your
question
a
little
bit,
but
after
learning
about
the
commission
for
post-secondary
education
and
the
regulations
and
what
they
can
do,
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
I
want
this
bill
to
do
with
the
complaint
process
and
things
being
put
on
institutions
website
is
to
get
the
fact
that
they
exist
out
there
more
so
that
students
know
that
they
are
there,
so
that
if
there
are
any
complaints,
they
are
the
entity
that
can
ensure
that
the
institution
you
know
holds
up
their
ends
of
the
agreement.
J
Okay,
thank
you.
I
appreciate
I,
I
appreciate
your
response
and
attention
to
that
and
again.
I
would
think
that,
if
they,
if
these
schools
were
accepting
fafsa
or
any
type
of
federal
funding,
that
they
definitely
should
be
under
those
same
expectations,
thank
you
and
thank
you.
A
K
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
I
I
appreciate
the
way
you
present
bills
and
thanks
for
going
through
point
by
point
and
giving
your
explanation
of
not
only
the
bill,
but
the
amendment
just
have
a
couple
questions,
and
forgive
me
if
I
missed
this
in
your
explanation,
but
you
mentioned
in
the
amendment
that
shall
not
permit
its
personnel
to
engage
in
recruiting
activities
in
settings
where
prospective
students
cannot
reasonably
be
expected
to
make
informed
and
considered
enrollment
decisions,
and
I
just
wondered
if
you
could
elaborate
a
little
bit
more
on
some
examples
of
what
might
constitute
not
being
able
to
be
reasonably
expected
to
make
those
decisions.
F
Thank
you
for
the
question
to
assemblywoman
tolls
through
madame
chair
at
bill
bay
axelrod.
This
is
vinisha
considine
for
the
record,
so
this
language
was
language
that
has
been
used
across
the
country,
although
they,
the
language,
does
actually
have
a
laundry
list
of
places,
including
homeless
shelter,
welfare
offices,
areas
where
perhaps
people
with
low
incomes
or
in
situations
where
they
cannot
in
areas
that
are
high
drug
use,
where
they're
not
being
able
to
make
good
good
decisions
that
recruiters
in
some
other
states.
F
F
I
understand
the
reasoning
why
in
some
states
that
they
will
list,
let's
say
the
welfare
office,
but
on
the
other
hand,
that
also
means
well
what
if
the
welfare
office
is
in
a
job
connect
area
where
they're
going
to
have
like
a
school
fair
and
these
other
schools
want
to
come
in.
You
know
as
well
and
potentially
talk
about.
You
know
what
that
institution
is
offering
and
we
didn't
want
to
get
into
into
into
too
many
conflicts
on
that.
F
K
Yes,
thank
you
and
I
I
appreciate
that
the
minute
we
start
enumerating
long
lists,
then
it
leaves
open
the
door
for
what
if
we
missed
something-
and
so
I
I
agree
with
that
philosophy
of
keeping
it
more
broad
and
just
as
long
as
we
are
you
know,
because
in
in
some
of
those
circumstances,
we
want
to
connect
individuals
with
education,
opportunities
that
connect
them
with
employment
opportunities
and
and
we're
not
in
any
way
restricting
that
we're
just
making
sure
that
it's
not
under
the
auspice
of
perhaps
taking
advantage
of
those
individuals
without
the
proper
counseling
and
guiding
them
through
steps
to
get
them
educated
and
back
on
their
feet.
K
So
my
next
question,
so
thank
you
for
your
explanation
and
just
my
next
question
is
that
your
third
item
under
the
additions
and
the
amendment
is
that
we
include
a
mandated
disclosure
page
on
the
website
and
failure
to
have
that
disclosure
page
is
a
sanctionable
offense,
and
I
just
if
I've
missed
it,
forgive
me.
But
what
are
the
sanctions
we're
proposing
in
this
legislation?.
F
Of
that,
oh
thank
you
for
the
question
assemblywomantools
through
madam
chair
to
assemblywoman.
This
is
vanesha
considine
for
the
record.
Thank
you
for
that
question.
That
is
something
that
I
am
still
working
with
the
commission
on
on
flashing
out,
because
right
now
there
are
no
sanctions,
or
at
least
none
that
I'm
aware
of
and
in
order
to
enforce,
in
order
to
reward
the
good
actors
but
enforce
the
bad.
You
know
enforce
things
against
the
bad
actors.
F
I
believe
we
need
to
have
some
some
sanctions,
because
if
it
is
a
for-profit
institution
that
is
really
not
doing
the
education
part,
the
only
way
to
dissuade
them
is
through
a
financial
sanction.
So
I
am
still
working
with
the
commission
to
work
out
how
how
we
do
that
and
where
those
sanctions
go.
I
do
not
believe
they
would
be
extensive
sanctions.
I
believe
that
would
be
a
three-digit
sanction.
J
Okay,
so
chair
bilbray
axelrod
had
to
go
to
another
committee
to
present
one
of
her
own
bills,
so
at
this
time
just
want
to
check
in
and
see
if
there
are
any
additional
questions.
J
All
right
seeing
no
additional
questions
at
this
time.
Why
don't
we
open
it
up
for
anyone
that
would
like
to
testify
in
support
of
ab215
so
broadcasting?
If
we
I'm
sorry
ab169
broadcasting,
if
we
could
open
the
lines
and
again
we
asked
that
you
limit
your
testimony
to
as
close
as
to
two
minutes
as
possible,
so
we'll
give
it
a
minute
while
people
are
calling
in
for.
J
C
C
I
already
have
one
color:
we
would
you
like
me
to
cue
them
up.
Yes,.
J
C
E
Vice
chair
and
committee
members,
my
name
is
andrew
lee
pilbert,
the
last
name,
l
e
p
e.
I
l
b
e
t-
and
I
am
the
representative
for
combat
wounded
veterans
with
purple
hearts
in
the
state
of
nevada,
70,
000,
disabled
american
veterans
in
the
state
of
nevada,
and
I
am
the
current
state
chair
for
the
united
veterans
legislative
council.
E
E
Their
continuing
education
and
programs
of
change
is
essential
for
their
advancements
in
the
military
and
in
order
to
get
additional
degrees
and
classes,
it's
essential
that
they
continue
this
program
and
not
lose
part
of
their
gi
bill
and
other
veterans
benefits.
Secondly,
our
veterans
that
are
now
trying
to
get
back
into
the
working
community.
E
H
J
C
C
C
I
For
the
record,
my
name
is
kelly:
wiest
k-e-l-l-y
w-u-e-s-t.
I
am
the
administrator
of
the
commission
on
post-secondary
education.
First,
I
would
like
to
thank
assemblywoman
constantine
for
taking
the
time
to
meet
with
myself
and
share
clark
with
the
commission
concerning
the
language
of
the
bill.
I
Consumer
protection
for
students
is
of
the
utmost
importance
to
the
commission
and
we
appreciate
the
desired
legislators
being
increased
student
protections
and
clarify
the
law.
Just
to
give
you
some
background.
Currently
the
commission
on
post-secondary
education
licensed
149
institutions,
both
for-profit
and
non-profit,
and
they
offer
programs
from
pre-licensing
all
the
way
up
to
college
degrees.
At
the
doctoral
level.
I
The
number
of
institutions
right
now
include
25
colleges
and
universities,
23
pre-licensed
programs
and
101
institutions
at
the
non-college
degree
level.
So
39
of
our
institutions
are
accredited
and
they're
accredited
by
15
separate
accrediting
bodies.
Each
accrediting
body
has
their
own
set
of
rules
and
regulations,
and
it
brings
an
additional
level
of
complexity
to
trying
to
regulate
institutions.
I
I
The
conceptual
amendment
to
substance
that
clarifies
substantially
failing
to
furnish
the
required
training
will
permit
the
institutions
to
meet
the
workforce
needs,
and
yet
the
accrediting
value
needs
yes,
ma'am.
That
was
to
my.
C
C
C
J
Thank
you
with
that
assemblywoman
constandine.
Is
there
any
final
remarks
you'd
like
to
make.
F
F
J
C
Report
size
chair
to
join,
to
make
public
comment.
Please
press
star
nine
now
to
take
your
place
in
the
queue.
C
J
Okay,
we'll
wait
a
few
moments
because
we
want
to
make
sure
people
that
are
that
do
intend
to
call
in
have
have
a
little
bit
of
time
to
call
in.
So
let's
just
wait
a
few
moments
and
see
if
anyone.
C
J
C
C
J
Okay,
thank
you.
Well
with
that,
I
will
close.
We
public
comment
and
just
again
remind
everyone
that
our
next
meeting
will
be
thursday,
the
18th
at
1
30,
and
with
that
this
meeting
is
adjourned.
Thank
you.