►
From YouTube: 5/29/2021 - Assembly Committee on Government Affairs
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
Please
let
the
record
reflect
that
assemblywoman
martinez
is
absent.
Excused
oh,
never
mind,
please
let
the
record
reflect
that
assembly
where
martinez
is
present,
our
members
are
present
and
we
have
a
quorum
good
morning.
Members
we
are
back.
The
the
assembly
committee
on
government
affairs
is
back
from
a
very
long
recess.
A
We
I
just
wanted
to
give
everybody
a
lay
of
the
land.
Well,
we
have
one
bill
up
for
presentation
today,
we'll
get
a
pulse
from
the
members
at
how
we
feel
about
that
and
potentially
consider
taking
action
immediately
after
the
hearing,
depending
on
where
the
members
are
and
then
afterwards
we'll
go
into
public
comment
and
then
we'll
recess,
just
in
case
we
have
to
come
back
for
any
reason.
A
We
know
that
we're
on
deadline-
and
we
just
have
to
be
as
accommodating
and
flexible
as
we
can
be-
to
help
move
those
last
bills
that
are
making
their
way
over.
I
want
to
remind
those
of
you
following
us
via
the
internet,
that
please
know
that
we're
hoping
to
consistently
go
to
those
in
the
room.
First
wishing
to
speak
and
support
opposition
neutral
and
then
we'll
go
to
those
on
zoom
and
then
the
phone,
so
we
ask
that
you
be
patient,
I
know.
Sometimes
you
have
to
wait
for
a
little
bit.
A
A
C
Thank
you,
chair
flores,
for
the
record
mo
dennis
representing
senate
district
2
in
clark
county
and
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
present
senate
bill
205,
which
addresses
an
oversight
that
occurred
when
emergency
regulations
were
adopted
last
year
by
the
division
of
industrial
relations
of
the
department
of
business
and
industry,
as
you
can
tell
it's
a
fairly
short
bill.
So
if
you
didn't
have
a
chance
to
read
it,
you
could
probably
do
it
by
the
time
I'm
done
with
my
presentation.
D
Mr
chairman,
member
of
the
committee
for
the
record,
el
diablo,
it's
spelled
e-l-d-I
sorry
warren
hardy,
representing
renai
america
corporation.
I
apologize
for
the
mask
I
negative
for
kobe,
but
I
have
not
had
my
distemper
shot
yet
this
year.
So
thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
accommodation
on
this
bill,
and
I
want
to
thank
senator
dennis
for
his
willingness
to
step
forward
on
this
bill,
as
he
indicated
I'll.
Try
to
be
as
brief
as
I
can.
D
D
In
the
course
of
that
regulation.
There
was
an
inadvertent
sweeping
into
the
boiler
regulation
of
certain
water
heaters,
the
division
and
the
construction
industry
recognized
that
immediately
and
provided
an
exemption
for
those
in
the
regulation.
However,
what
did
not
happen
is
when
they
provided
that
exemption.
They
provided
it
only
for
tanked
water
heaters
and
not
for
tankless
water
heaters.
Tankless
water
heaters
are
becoming
increasingly
popular
because
of
their
efficiency.
D
A
gym
athletic
club
which
I've
never
been
to,
but
I've
heard
about,
and
they
they
like
them
in
in
series,
because
when
they're
first
there
in
the
morning
they
may
run
one
or
two
and
then
they
ramp
it
up
as
demand
so
they're
efficient.
D
They
don't
take
up
as
much
space
they're
becoming
very
popular,
so
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
they
could
continue
to
function
and
and
operate
on
par
with
tanked
heaters.
So
we
brought
this
legislation
forward,
although
it
could
be
dealt
with
in
regular
regulation
and
dir
expressed
a
willingness
to
do
that.
But
we
thought
that
that
would
take
a
year
or
so
and
in
the
meantime
these
tank
heaters
would
tankless
heaters
would
be
at
a
competitive
disadvantage.
D
We
did
meet
with
dir
on
this
legislation,
the
in
the
bill
itself,
the
second
reprint,
the
definition
of
water
heater
itself,
is
taken
from
suggestions
from
dir,
the
section
1.4,
with
relation
with
relation
to
the
types
of
water
heaters.
We're
trying
to
exempt
was
taken
directly
from
the
regulation.
D
The
sticking
point
on
this
and
I'll
just
speak
with
it,
speak
to
it
in
advance,
because
I
know
that
the
division's
here
to
speak
to
it.
The
division
feels
strongly
that,
when
these
are
installed
in
series,
there
should
be
additional
regulation.
We
we
don't
have
any
quarrel
with
that.
These
are
currently
regulated
through
the
uniform
mechanical
codes
and
by
the
local
governments.
D
We
feel
that
sufficient
no
state
in
in
the
united
states,
with
the
exception
of
massachusetts,
goes
the
extra
step
of
regulating
these
at
the
state
level.
If
that's
something
the
dir
feels
strongly
about,
we
have
no
objection
to
them.
Promulgating,
a
regulation
to
do
that.
We
just
feel
like
that
type
of
policy
decision
again
where
we
would
join
massachusetts
in
regulating
these
at
the
state
level
should
be
done
through
a
complete
regulatory
process
and
not
accidentally
through
an
emergency
regulation.
D
We
did
not
want
to
foreclose
on
their
ability
to
take
a
strong
look
at
it
and
consider
the
safety
safety
issues
related
to
it,
but
I
would
but
I
would
just
reiterate,
for
the
committee
and
then
I'll
stand
down
for
questions
that
no
state
regulates
these
the
state
levels
except
massachusetts
and,
as
I
understand
it,
massachusetts
did
it
because
they
were
more
interested
in
a
type
of
tankless
or
in-series
apparatus
than
they
were.
This
concern
about
the
safety
issue.
So
again,
I
you
should,
in
nellis,
have
record.
D
Letters
from
many
members
of
the
industry,
from
associations
in
the
industry
from
all
folks
that
believe
this
should
be
corrected
and
allowed
dir
to
go
forward
and
adopt
a
regulation
if
they
feel
it's
necessary.
Also,
there
should
be
letters
there
and
I
know
clark
county
here
is
here
as
well.
There
should
be
letters
there
from
the
local
governments
speaking
to
the
efficiency
of
having
them
regulated
by
the
uniform
mechanical
code
at
the
local
level.
With
that,
mr
chair
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
The
committee
might
have.
A
Thank
you,
sir,
and
with
that
members
will
open
it
up
for
questions.
I
am
looking
through
the
chat
now
and
we'll
start
off
with
assemblyman
ellison.
Please.
E
The
questions
that
I've
got
is
number
one:
the
tankless
water
heater.
You
know
you're
starting
to
see
more
of
these,
but
the
problem
you
got
is
they're
trying
to
make
everything.
Go
energy
efficient,
electric
water
heaters
demands.
If
you're
going
to
put
your
house
on
the
tankless
system,
it
creates
all
new
services
because
of
the
loads
loads
are
twice
as
heavy
as
a
regular
water
heater
and
then
the
the
water
heaters
that
are
replaced
or
new
is
inspected
by
the
cities
and
the
counties.
So
that's
a
regulation,
that's
already
implemented.
E
So
I
I'm
kind
of
confused
where
what
we're
trying
to
get
at
because
they're
already
regulated
they're
already
inspected-
and
you
know-
and
I
got
both-
I've
got
tankless
water
heaters
and
some
things
for
small
bathrooms
that
that's
all
they
do
or
and
then
I've
got
tons
of
regular
water
heaters
that
are
in
residential,
rentals
or
commercial.
D
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
to
mr
ellison,
so
this
this
this
legislation
that,
before
you
today,
attempts
to
make
sure
there's
not
the
additional
regulation
at
the
state
level
for
tanked
or
tankless
water
heaters
that
are
that
are
installed.
D
The
issue
for
dir
is
when
they're
installed
in
series
in
series
installations
and
parallel
installations
are
done
regularly
on
tankless
water
heaters
and
tanked
heaters
in
in
areas
like
the
restaurant
industry,
for
example,
where
they
need
the
redundancy,
because
the
health
code
says,
if
you
don't
have
hot
water,
you
can't
operate
so
they
install
these
in
in
in
series.
Interestingly
enough,
while
we
were
holding
the
hearing
in
the
senate,
I
got
a
text
from
former
senator
my
former
colleague
and
former
congressman
joe
heck
saying
hey.
I
have.
D
I
have
impair
n
series
tank
heaters
in
my
house,
so
in
some
homes
they
they
do
so.
The
intent
of
this,
mr
ellison,
through
the
chair,
is
to
try
to
specify
that
the
local
government
regulation
is
sufficient.
D
However,
we
did
not
want
to
foreclose
on
the
ability
of
dir
if
they
thought
it
was
important
to
go
forward
and
investigate
and
look
at
this
to
promulgate
a
regulation
to
that
effect.
If
we
did
go
forward
with
it,
they
will
be
they.
They
will
be
the
second
state
in
the
country
that
does
it
and
in
the
interest
of
full,
full
and
full
disclosure,
I
will
oppose
that
regulation.
For
that
very
reason.
These
are.
D
These
are
safe,
far
safer
than
the
kind
of
tank
tank
heaters
we're
talking
about,
because
they're
very
small
units,
and
that's
why
we
put
the
language
in
relative
to
equipped
with
automatic
controls
which
limit
the
heat.
D
D
So
this
would
not
impact
that,
but
these
are
becoming
increasingly
popular
in
construction,
and
I
think
if
we
don't
clarify
this,
what
will
happen
is
construction
construction
will
move
away
from
tanked
heaters
until
this
is
resolved.
Tankless
heaters
until
this
is
resolved
and
they'll
go
back
to
the
full
tank
heaters
which
are
designed
to
keep
the
temperature
of
the
water
the
same
24
7,
whether
you
need
it
or
not.
Tankless
heaters
are
on
demand.
You
they
only
heat
the
water
when
you
need
it.
D
C
Mr
chairman
have
ever
heard
him
do
just
so
that
I
to
clarify
on
the
because
he
we
keep
referring
to
it
when
he
when
he
refers
to
in
series
you
would
you
would
wonder
why
would
you
need
to
do
an
in-series
that
fits
an
on-demand
water
heater?
But
you
know
each
on-demand
water
heater
can
only
produce
so
much
water
and
eventually
it's
not
hot
anymore,
and
it's
got
it
even
though
it's
doing
it
on
the
fly.
C
So
these
are
put
you
know
next
to
each
other,
so
that
you've
got
multiple
of
these
tankless
heaters
next
to
each
other
in
in
what
he
called
series.
He
also
mentioned
parallel,
which
is
a
different
setup,
but
you
know
what
we've
been
talking
about
here
is
the
in-series.
E
E
D
D
We
think
the
dir
should
take
a
look
at
this
and
and
promulgated
regulation,
if
necessary,
which
is
exactly
why
we
wanted
to
be
careful
not
to
foreclose
on
their
ability
to
do
that,
because,
as
this
technology
advances
and
moves
forward,
it's
entirely
appropriate
for
the
dir
to
be
able
to
look
at
it
and
make
sure
that
the
public
safe.
This
legislation
is
about
nothing
more
than
putting
tank
heaters
and
tankless
water
heaters
on
par
in
statute.
D
So
we
can
never
have
a
situation
where
this
happens
again,
where
they
adopt
a
regulation
and
invert
inadvertently
applies
to
one
and
not
the
other.
F
Thank
you
chair.
I
have
one
question
and
thank
you
for
bringing
this
forward,
and
I
know
you've
probably
already
addressed
this,
but
it
is
just
my
curiosity.
I
do
know
that
tankless
water
heaters
are
fairly
new.
They
are
becoming
more
popular.
I'm
not
surprised
that
many
states
don't
have
any
any
rules
on
that
because
they're
fairly
new
but
reading
all
of
the
exhibits.
F
There
was
a
mention
that
in
the
first
reprint
of
the
bill
that
there
was
language
in
that
bill
to
allow
dir
to
continue
to
regulate
them,
and
it's
not
in
the
second
reprint,
so
my
question
is:
was
it
intentionally
in
the
first
reprint
and
and
if
so,
what's
changed
or
why
was
it
in
an
earlier
version?
Not
in
this
version?
Thank
you.
D
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Warren
hardy,
for
your
record,
so
section
1.5
is
the
section
that
enables
them
if
the
language
did
change
it
broadened,
because
the
original
language
was
a
little
too
direct
and
specific
about
their
ability
to
potentially
promulgate
a
regulation
relating
to
this
very
specific
type
of
water
heater.
So
the
language
change,
so
section
1.5
is
the
provision
that
allows
them
to
promulgate
a
regulation
and
the
difference
between
the
first
reprint
and
the
second
reprint
is.
This
is
far
broader.
This
allows
them
to
look
at
every
aspect.
D
I
think
the
dir
is
going
to
testify
that
their
interpretation
of
section
1.5
is
that
it
only
allows
them
to
regulate,
adopt
a
regulation
related
to
the
connection
of
the
water
heater.
I
checked
with
legal
counsel
in
the
other
house
and
they
said
that
they
didn't
believe
that
was
the
case.
Our
intent
is
not
to
limit
them
to
the
connection
of
water
heaters.
It's
to
allow
them
to
promulgate
any
regulation.
C
Chair
the
senator
dennis
I
I
wanted
also
in
in
our
first
hearing.
You
know
we
talked
about
that
issue
that
I
mean
this
wasn't
about
not
taking
away
the
ir's
ability
to
regulate,
should
they
choose,
and
so
we
were
trying
to
clarify
that
when
we
did
this
other
amendment
to
say,
hey,
we
just
want
to
fix
this
issue.
That
happened
because
of
the
emergency
regulation,
and
then,
if
you
want
to
promulgate,
we
were
trying
to
put
something
in
statute.
F
D
Sorry,
mr
chair
warren
hardy
that
that
discussion
was
on
the
record,
mr
keen
from
legal,
helped
us
draft
this
amendment
and
I
double
back
with
him
after
I,
I
heard
that
concern
from
dir,
because
we
don't
want
to
limit
that
in
any
way
and
if
we
need,
of
course,
at
this
late
date,
I
would
hate
to
have
to
have
an
amendment.
D
G
D
A
D
I
think,
mr
york,
if
you're,
if
you're
listening,
I'm
sorry,
I
did
forward
you
a
copy
of
the
the
zoom
link
that
was
provided
by
senator
genesis
office
this
morning
so
but
he
would
be
able
to
answer
those
questions.
Mr
chairman,
assemblyman
thomas,
I
know
that
one
of
the
reasons
these
are
so
popular
is
because
of
the
the
lifespan
and
the
efficiency
of
them.
They
don't
have
the
water
sitting
in
the
tank
and
you
I've
left
my
house,
my
wife's
in
california,
visiting
the
grandkids.
D
G
Right
and
that
answer
kind
of
leads
into
the
segway
of
does
it
have
an
automatic
shut-off
valve
in
case
it
got
too
hot
or
you
know,
might
hurt
someone.
D
Mr
chairman,
that's
that's
an
excellent
question
and
this
technology
I
think,
is
additionally
popular
because
of
the
safety
you
don't
it
so
these
in
series
and
when
you
have
a
boiler.
I
was
talking
to
my
good
friend
danny
thompson
about
this
and
he
was
explaining
how
boilers,
work
and
there's
like
a
six
inch
gas
line
leading
or
something
like
leading
into
these
boilers,
and
he
said
it's
like
a
small
nuclear
bomb
when
they
explode.
D
These
are
in
series
small,
you
know
so
they're
individually,
fed
in
the
installation,
but
all
of
the
things
you're
talking
that
miss
thomas
is
talking
about
mr
chair
is
the
safety
is
the
same.
They
have
the
pressure
relief
valves,
they
have
all
those
all
of
those
safety
devices,
and
I
should
indicate
at
this
point
and
thank
you
for
reminding
me
assemblywoman.
D
But
at
this
point
I
should
add,
you
know
if
you
look
at
if
you
look
at
the
the
direct
guidance
from
the
the
companies,
these
are
designed
to
be
installed
in
series
they're
warrantied
to
be
this
is
the
purpose
of
them.
A
H
Good
morning,
mr
chair
members
of
the
committee
for
the
record,
justin
harrison
representing
clark
county
here
today
in
support
of
sb
205,
would
first
like
to
thank
senator
dennis
and
mr
hardy,
for
presenting
the
bill
and
going
through
the
details.
Really
would
just
like
to
reiterate
some
of
the
comments
that
were
made
by
our
presenters
that
currently
local
governments
already
have
local
codes
and
ordinances
that
appropriately
address
the
permitting,
as
well
as
inspection
of
these
in-series
installations,
particularly
I'll
speak
to
clark
county
and
our
our
local
codes.
H
A
I
Thank
you
for
having
me
so
I
I
was
listening
earlier.
I
was
in
on
the
the
public
call-in,
so
I
did
hear
a
couple
of
the
questions
and
so
I'll
try
to
address
those
right
now.
One
of
the
questions
was
on
lifespan.
I
These
water
heaters
typically
carry
a
a
warranty
on
the
products
in
12
to
15
years
and
are
expected
to
last
between
10
and
20
years,
typically
in
the
market,
so
that's
on
par
and
usually
superior
to
most
commercial
gas
water
heaters
that
are
currently
on
the
market
that
carry
from
three
to
seven
year,
warranties
on
the
storage
water,
heater
market.
The
other
question
was:
do
these
have
safeties?
These
are
all
fully
csa.
Certified
products
all
carry
third
party
recognition
in
the
industry,
like
any
other
water
heater
that
is
currently
on
the
market.
I
They
do
have
safety
limit
switches
as
well
as
dual
monitoring
temperature
indicators
or
thermistors
that
measure
the
outgoing
temperature,
because
there's
a
tankless
water
heater,
unlike
storage
water
heaters,
they
are
delivering
on
demand,
and
so
we
deliver
a
precise
temperature
of
or
civic
water
to
the
end
user
based
on
the
selection.
So
we
monitor
that
with
two
different
inputs:
anytime,
there's
a
difference
between
those
inputs.
The
water
heater
was
set
down
in
a
safe
manner,
just
like
any
other
water
heater
on
the
market.
So
hopefully
those
answers,
those
questions
and
I
appreciate
the
time.
A
I
don't
believe
we
have
any
additional
questions
for
you.
Thank
you
for
joining
us
this
morning
and
at
this
point
we'll
go
back
to
those
wishing
to
testify
in
support
of
senate
bill
205.
We
don't
have
anybody
else
in
carson
city
at
this
time,
we'll
go
to
the
zoom.
A
J
A
Thank
you
at
this
time
we'll
go
to
those
wishing
to
testify
in
opposition
again
we
don't
have
anybody
present
in
the
room,
we'll
go
to
the
we'll
go
to
zoom.
A
J
A
B
Thank
you,
mr
chair
victoria.
I
am
the
administrator
at
the
division
of
industrial
relations.
Our
office
is
neutral
on
the
second
reprint
of
sb
205
and
our
mechanical
compliance
section
regulates
boilers
and
water
heaters
only
in
commercial
buildings.
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that
we
do
not
regulate
water
heaters
or
most
boilers
in
single-family
homes,
and
our
primary
concern
is
public
safety.
So
there
was
brought
up
about
local
governments.
They
do
installation
permits
of
these
water
heaters.
B
However,
in
contrast,
our
office
does
an
initial
permit
and
operating
permits
every
two
years
of
the
devices
that
we
regulate
so
under
current
law,
water
heaters
that
do
not
exceed
certain
limitations
are
currently
exempt
from
the
permitting
requirements.
However,
this
only
applies
to
the
traditional
tanked
water
heaters,
and
so
the
tankless
water
heaters
of
any
size
that
are
currently
installed
in
a
commercial
setting
are
currently
required
to
obtain
an
operating
permit.
B
So
sp205
would
change
these
requirements
so
for
single
installations
of
tankless
water
heaters
meeting
these
criteria,
those
are
a
very
low
safety
risk
and
our
office
is
supportive
of
exempting
those
devices
to
make
sure
that
they
have
parity
between
both
the
traditional
and
the
tanked
water
heaters.
However,
the
division
also
currently
regulates
water
heaters
that
are
installed
in
series.
These
are
often
called
rack
heateds
and
in
these
cases
these
water
heaters
are
combined
together
to
have
a
higher
level
of
input
heat.
B
So,
for
example,
a
rack
of
six
of
these
tankless
water
heaters
provides
a
maximum
input
heat
of
over
a
million
btus,
and
so
that
is
comparable
to
a
large
commercial
boiler.
So,
just
to
give
you
some
examples
of
the
ones
that
are
currently
regulated,
we
have
the
alexis
park
hotel
nearly
3
million
btus
golden
knights
arena,
1.6
million
btus,
prim
valley
resort
and
casino
3.6
million
btus.
B
When
you
have
an
input
heat
of
that
amount,
that
is
a
large
amount
of
gas.
We
recommend
that
these
continue
to
be
regulated,
because
there
are
definitely
some
safety
concerns
with
that.
In
our
regulations,
an
emergency
shutoff
valve
is
required.
That
was
something
that
was
put
in
place
in
2020
in
the
wake
of
the
argenta
hall
explosion.
Just
for
reference
that
boiler
was
1.2
million
btus.
B
B
The
regulatory
authority
that
is
being
provided
in
the
proposed
sb205
in
our
reading
only
applies
to
the
connections
to
the
water
heaters,
not
the
water
heaters
themselves.
However,
in
the
first
reprint
there
was
specific
language
about
the
interconnection
of
water
heaters
installed
in
the
series
in
section
1.4
and
making
those
exempt
from
the
exemption.
B
A
I
Brennan
patterson
for
the
record
chief
administrative
officer
of
the
mechanical
compliance
section,
division
of
industrial
relations
administrator
carrion,
I
believe,
has
spoken
very
well
already
on
this,
but
if
anyone
has
any
technical
questions
or
questions
about
how
these
items
are
currently
regulated
or
what
is
seen
in
the
field,
I'm
here
to
answer
anything,
you
might
wish
to
ask.
A
J
A
C
A
C
Yes,
the
other
one
that
we
usually
we
usually
try
to
do
this
on
the
floor
over
and
sometimes
we
can
do
the
puns.
The
other
one
is
that
you
know
we
all
have
this
tankless
job
thing.
A
And
with
that
members,
I
think
I
got
a
temperature
read
of
the
room
there
we
go.
Yes,
I
got
one
in,
but
at
this
time
I'd
like
to
entertain
a
motion
to
do
pass
senate
bill
205.,
madam
vice
chair,
has.
A
Assembly
macarthur
will
be
doing
the
floor
statement
on
senate
bill
205.
next
on
the
agenda.
We
have
public
comment.
A
I
don't
believe
we
have
anybody
in
the
room
wishing
to
join
us
for
public
comment,
so
we'll
go
to
zoom
and
again
I
don't
believe
we
have
anybody
there
broadcast
anybody
on
the
phone
lines
wishing
to
join
us
for
public
comment.
A
Thank
you,
members
again,
I
wanted
to
repeat
the
lay
of
the
land
for
the
remainder
of
the
next
two
days.
We
will
recess,
not
because
we
anticipate
coming
back.
However,
we
want
to
leave
the
door
open,
should
there
any
should
there
be
any
bills
or
anything
that
moved
the
last
minute
that
we'd
be
ready
to
address
that
matter
at
that
time,
because
I
don't
know
if
we
will
be
meeting
again.
A
I
just
wanted
to
take
a
quick
personal
point
of
privilege
last
time
I
didn't
do
this
because
I
did
expect
a
bunch
of
bills
to
come
into
the
committee
had
I
known
that
they
weren't
going
to
make
their
way
here.
I
would
have
done
this
before,
but
I
wanted
to
first
thank
all
our
staff
for
for
their
incredible
work,
this
session.
A
As
you
all
understand,
this
work
is
easy
because
of
them,
and
I'm
talking
about
everybody,
secretaries
minutes
the
folk
that
are
in
my
office
committee
manager,
policy,
analysts,
lawyers,
every
single
one
of
you-
we
just
are
incredibly
indebted
to
you
and
for
those
of
you
following
us
along
know
that
the
legislators
show
up
and
get
this
work
done.
Only
because
of
them,
they
truly
are
amazing,
so
we're
incredibly
grateful
to
have
them
members.
It's
been
an
honor
to
serve.
Alongside
of
all
of
you,
I
appreciate
the
dialogue.
A
We
come
from
very
different
walks
of
life,
very
different
angles,
perspectives.
There
is
no
question
that
that
maybe
outside
of
this
room,
you
would
doubt
that
a
lot
of
us
would
be
sitting
on
the
same
table,
but
I
think
a
lot
of
us
have
grown
a
friendship,
and
I
appreciate
that.
I
appreciate
the
different
perspectives
and-
and
I
think
this
is
what
nevada
is
all
about-
we
don't
always
agree,
but
we
can
be
respectful
and
engage
in
some
good
dialogue.
So
thank
you,
members
for
your
service.
A
It's
been
an
absolute
honor
serving
alongside
of
you,
and
I
hope
that
we
can
continue
working
together
in
the
interim
for
for
the
better
of
nevada.
Again,
thank
you
to
all
the
all
of
you
and
for
all
the
folks
who
engage
with
this
committee.
Thank
you
for
indulging
us
with
all
the
fun
times.
We've
had
mr
el
diablo
for
those
of
you
who
don't
know
that
reference
every
time
we
would
call
in.
We
would
hear
a
caller
with
the
last
three
numbers:
six
six
six
and
then
it
will
always
diablo
showed
up.