►
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
C
D
A
Thank
you,
and
if
there
was
anyone
who's,
not
here,
please
mark
me
present
when
they
arrive.
I
would
like
to
extend
welcome
to
everyone
viewing
the
meeting
online
and
those
participating
by
phone
video.
A
few
housekeeping
issues
to
address
before
we
move
forward
is,
if
you
wish
to
testify,
you
can
pre-register
online
through
the
link.
That's
provided
on
the
agenda
registration
opens
when
the
agenda
is
posted
on
the
nevada
legislature's
website
and
upon
successful
registration,
you
will
be
provided
a
telephone
number
and
meeting
id
and
instructions
for
joining
the
meeting.
A
When
testifying,
please
ensure
to
unmute
your
microphone
and
speak
clearly
and
also
state,
and
spell
your
name
for
the
record
committee.
Members
are
using
not
just
their
laptop,
but
in
many
cases
like
myself,
also
a
monitor
on
our
desk.
So
if
it
looks
like
we're,
looking
sideways
and
looking
different
places,
it
is
because
we're
trying
to
hit
multiple
forms
of
technology
because
it
helps
with
with
the
different
bills
and
materials
that
we're
reading,
but
I
just
want
to
address
that,
so
you
know
that
we're
actually
not
distracted.
A
We
also
will
have
to
maintain
our
cameras
on
the
entire
time
and,
of
course,
for
all
of
us,
even
if
we're
participating
at
home,
it's
always
a
great
idea
to
make
sure
that
we
turn
off
the
volume
on
our
phones
as
to
not
be
interrupted.
A
At
the
end
of
the
meeting,
we
will
take
up
to
30
minutes
of
public
comment.
Each
person
will
have
the
ability
to
speak
for
up
to
two
minutes
with
that
again.
Committee
members,
please
leave
your
cameras
on
and
when
appropriate
after
the
bills.
If
you
have
a
question,
please
send
me
a
message
so
that
I
can
identify
and
acknowledge
you
to
ask
your
question
on
the
agenda.
Today
we
will
be
hearing
two
bills
and
we
are
actually
taking
those
two
bills
out
of
order.
C
C
I
appreciate
that
many
of
us
have
gotten
calls
and
concerns
about
what
this
bill
proposes
to
do,
but
the
reality
is
our
current
definition
of
lobbyists
for
the
purposes
of
registering
requires
that
they
enter
the
building
in
this
virtual
world,
where
that
is
not
at
least
for
the
time
being
part
of
the
operation
of
the
the
legislature.
C
For
the
sake
of
transparency,
we
still
need
to
be
able
to
have
lobbying
activities
being
reported
to
the
public,
and
this
is
an
effort
to
do
just
that
after
it
was
brought
to
our
attention
that
lobbyists
were
not
allowed
to
enter
the
building,
which
is
how
they
register,
let
alone
need
to
register
or
our
ability
to
require
that
they
register
based
on
the
existing
definition.
C
So
this
is
an
effort
to
update
our
statute
with
respect
to
the
virtual
nature
of
session
currently,
but
also
that
to
increase
transparency
with
respect
to
lobbying
activities.
It
is
not
intended
to
change
who
has
to
register
who
has
to
register
from
who
had
to
previously
register
if
entering
the
building.
So
as
I'm
I'm
certain
mr
erdos
will
go
through.
C
There
are
clients
who
have
lobbyists
and
their
lobbyists
register
on
their
behalf,
and
that
has
not
changed
or
is
not
proposed
to
be
changed,
but
we
are
instead
trying
to
take
into
account
the
virtual
nature
of
allowing
activity
in
this
current
environment.
So
with
that,
I
would
love
to
step
aside
and
allow
director
brenda
erdos
to
present
the
bill.
B
E
You
go
okay,
great.
Thank
you.
Thanks
for
letting
me
know,
nrs
218f
150
prohibits
me
from
opposing
or
urging
the
passage
of
legislation,
except,
as
my
duties
require
me
to
make
recommendations
to
you.
E
I
don't
plan
to
urge
or
oppose
the
legislation
today,
but
instead
would
like
to
just
make
you
aware
of
the
issue
that
we
have
with
lobbyist
registration
and
regulation
and
also
explain
the
provisions
of
ab-110,
the
brian,
formerly
the
legislative
council,
I
believe,
is
also
on
today,
as
well
as
your
committee
council,
kathleen
norris.
E
We
asked
we
found
the
document
for
this,
which
was
done
by
the
legislative
librarian
teresa
welton.
I
just
thought
you
might
want
this
information
to
see
it's
a
50-state
survey
of
what
all
the
other
states
do
in
terms
of
just
the
very
narrow
issue
of
who
they
who
they
require
to
be
registered.
E
So
hopefully
you
might
find
that
helpful.
It's
in
the
media
materials,
if
you
have
any
trouble
just
let
us
know
finding
that,
but
basically
ab110
is
pretty
simple.
All
of
the
substantive
change
that
that
is
the
change
to
nrs
is
in
section
two,
and
that
is
that
is
where
the
problem
lies.
E
As
the
speaker
indicated,
we
haven't,
we
weren't
able
to
register
any
lobbyists
or-
or
you
know,
require
reports
during
the
two
special
sessions,
because
there
was
no
no
one
in
the
building
who
was
lobbying,
and
that
has
continued.
You
know
for
the
first
part
of
this
session,
and
so
that's
why
we
would
like
to
take
out
the
first
part
of
the
test.
E
So
if
you
look
at
section
two
of
the
bill
on
page
three
it
in
red
there,
you
see
that
the
one
requirement
for
for
qualifying
as
a
lobbyist
is
appears
in
person
in
the
legislative
building
or
in
any
other
building
in
which
the
legislature
or
any
of
us
standing
committees
hold
meetings.
E
And
so
this
building
has
been
been
closed.
As
you
know,
right
now
it's
limited
to
only
legislators,
essential
staff
and
a
small
media
pool
and
the
las
vegas
office
building
is
also
closed.
Right
now
so
there
haven't
been
anybody
who
would
meet
the
requirement
of
of
lobbyists
and
therefore
we
have
not
to
date.
E
Okay
to
date,
we
have
not
been
able
to
provide
registration
of
any
lobbyists
at
all
and
that's
why
we
are
suggesting
this
seems
to
be
the
the
simplest
fix
and
it
does.
If
you
look
at
that
50-state
chart,
I
believe
it
puts
us
more
in
line
with
the
rest
of
the
states.
E
We
didn't
actually
find
a
another
state
that
required
as
one
of
the
requirements
that
was
an
absolute
requirement
for
registration
to
actually
be
in
person
in
the
building,
and
so
this
would
leave
it
as
lobbyists
is
defined
as
a
person
who
communicates
directly
with
a
member
of
the
legislative
legislative
branch
on
behalf
of
someone
other
than
himself
or
herself
to
influence
legislative
action.
E
Whether
or
not
compensation
is
received
for
the
communication,
so
it
very
much
simplifies
that
the
the
second
I'm
sorry,
the
third
section
of
the
bill,
essentially
just
it
accounts
for
if
you
decide
to
pass
it
this
way.
What
we're
trying
to
do
there
is
to
say
that
if,
on
the
on
the
effective
date
of
this
act,
you
you
are
a
lobbyist
and
you
then
you
need
to
register
and
that
we're
asking
you
there
to
include
in
your
first
month.
E
They
report
monthly,
so
in
that
first
monthly
report,
that
you
include
the
time
from
the
the
first
day
of
session
through
when
this
bill
became
effective
and
the
reason
we
put
that
in
there
is
because
that
and
we're
suggesting
to
you
is
that
if
you
want
to
be
able
to
compare
this
session
with
all
the
other
sessions
and
all
the
information,
then
you
probably
would
want
to
have
that
information
as
well,
and
we
have
been
letting
lobbyists
know
also
that
if
this,
if
this
bill
passes
that
they
would
need
to
make
their
first
report
go
back
to
the
first
day
of
session.
E
The
other
part
of
the
bill
is
is
actually
section
one
and
it
states
the
intent
of
the
bill.
And
I
and
I
think
it's
important
to
look
at
its
the
last
in
the
last
subsection,
the
sub
six
on
page
three
of
the
bill.
E
At
the
very
end
there
it,
it
tells
you,
I
think,
a
very
important
point,
which
is
that
this
legislative
history
is
intended
to
say
that
you
know
that
lobbyists
who
would
otherwise
be
required
to
register
and
disclose
their
lobbying
activity
are
the
ones
that
we
are
we're
trying
to
include
here.
So
we're
not
trying
to
make
a
substantive
change
and
not
trying
to
add
people
more
people
to
be
registered,
nor
reduce
the
number.
E
But
this
is
our
best
attempt
to
to
capture
the
same
group
of
people
so
that
again,
you
keep
keep
going
as
we
have
in
the
past
as
far
as
how
many
people
need
to
be
need
to
be
registered,
and
we
believe
that
once
if
you
pass
this
bill
and
it
becomes
effective
that
we
would
be
able
to
very
quickly
process
all
of
the
registrations
and
and
get
them
in
so
that
we
would
have
them
up
on
the
web
as
well
as
everyone
would
be
able
to
be
filing
their
reports
as
normal,
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have
about
the
about
the
bill
or
about
the
process
or
anything
else.
A
Thank
you
director
with
that
committee
members.
Do
we
have
any
questions.
F
We
can
hear
you
assemblywoman,
okay,
I
just
got
a
message
done
myself,
so
I
just
have
actually
two
quick
questions,
one
if
you
could
just
clarify
I'm
sure
it's
not
the
intent
of
the
bill,
but
in
section
two
f,
where
it
talks
about
persons
who
are
persons
who
contact
legislators
who
are
elected
from
the
district
in
which
they
reside.
F
E
And
I'm
sure
would
you
like
me
to
answer
directly?
Yes,
please,
okay,
thank
you,
the
key
and
and
when
you
look
at
these
long
lists
of
things,
it's
it's
easy
to
get
to
get
this
confused.
But
if
you
look
at
the
top
of
that
subsection,
so
you
were
looking
at
e
there
and
at
the
very
top
of
that
subsection.
E
The
lead
in
there
is
lobbyist
does
not
include,
and-
and
so
I
think,
that's
a
very
important
part
of
this
to
say
that
that
again,
those
those
are
people
who
lobbyists
do
not
include
and
and
we're
leaving
that
in
there
because
again,
that's
a
critical
function.
You
would
not,
at
least
in
the
past
you
haven't
wanted
to
have
your
constituents
have
to
be
registered
as
a
lobbyist.
F
C
If,
if
I
can,
madam
share
you,
if,
if,
if
assuming
woman,
if
you
are
referring
to
section
two
subsection
e,
f
or
or
f
yeah,
do
all
of
the
subsections
there
number
one
our
existing
law,
the
bill
isn't
proposing
to
change
number
two.
C
Those
are
the
things
that
are
not
lobbyists,
so
everything
under
section
two
expressly
says
lobbyist
does
not
include
these
things,
a
b
c,
all
the
way
through
g,
so
existing
law.
Again,
this
doesn't
change
that
that's
existing
law,
but
under
existing
law
those
persons
would
not
be
considered
lobbyists
for
the
purposes
of
existing
statute,
as
well
as
this
change
with
respect
to
entering
the
building.
F
E
Yes,
that
that
is
part
of
the
process.
The
registration
process
is
basically
the
registration
fees
offset
the
cost
of
that,
and
so
they
will
be.
They
will
be
charged
the
same
fees
from
past
years.
E
I
think
it
hasn't
changed
since
2015
and
we're
not
intending
to
increase
the
fee,
but
they
would
be
required
to
pay
the
fee
for
registration
unless
they
are
there's
a
category
of
folks
who
are
exempt,
including
veterans
as
well
as
it's
in
a
different
section,
but
as
well
as
people
who
are
lobbying
for
non-um
organizations
that
are
non-profits.
A
Okay,
our
next
question
matthews.
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
just
wanted
to
touch
on
sort
of
the
the
potential
time
frame
regarding
this.
This
bill.
Obviously
the
bill
references,
the
current
pandemic,
and
why
this
is,
you
know,
obviously
necessary
and
appropriate
for
these
times,
but
it
doesn't
seem
to
me
there's
any
language
saying
that
this
would
be
the
new
definition
of
the
term
lobbyist
only
during
a
declared
emergency,
or
only
when
the
building's
close
to
the
public.
D
So
I
just
wanted
to
to
confirm
that
I'm
correct
about
that
that
this
would
be
a
permanent
change
under
all
circumstances
that
that's
the
intent
here
to
make
this
permanent,
and
if
so,
you
know,
maybe
just
a
little
bit
more
explanation
of
why
we
think
at
this
point
in
time
that
that
permanent
change
is
necessary
and
and
what
the
problems
may
have
been
with
the
old
system.
The
old
definition.
Thank
you.
C
If,
if
I
may
quickly
answer
that
question-
and
I
would
love
follow
up
from
lcb
to
make
sure
that
I'm
correct,
I
think
assemblyman
matthews
you're,
referring
to
the
declaration
which
is
not
statute.
The
statute
only
changes
the
definition
in
law
of
the
requirement
of
entering
a
building,
so
that
that's
all
that
the
bill
changes.
D
Well,
my
I
guess
maybe
just
to
restate
my
question
then,
to
make
sure
I'm
correct.
If
I
may,
madam
chair,
this
would
be
the
new.
This
would
be
the
new
permanent
definition
of
lobbyists
in
a
state
declared
emergency
or
or
not
going
forward.
Is
that
correct.
C
Again,
for
the
record,
sorry,
jason
fryerson.
No,
that's
not
correct.
If
you
reference
section
two,
the
bill
changes,
nrs,
218
8.080.
C
I
believe
that
the
declaration
is
laying
out
the
rationale
for
what
apparently
it's
relevant,
but
then
the
exhibits
show
how
we
compare
to
other
states
that
this
is
a
statutory,
a
proposed
statutory
change,
because,
whether
we're
in
a
pandemic
or
not,
there
are
many
folks
that
are
going
to
continue
to
meet
and
lobby
and
advocate
in
this
in
this
way,
and
so
we
want
to
be
able
to
capture
so
that
we
are
able
to
be
transparent
lobbying
activity,
whether
in
the
building
or
not,
and
I
I
believe
that
the
chart
shows
that
by
making
this
change,
we
I
think,
are
more
consistent
with
other
states
by
not
having
that
requirement
at
the
end
of
the
building
and
again,
I
would
suspect
that
some
folks
would
be
in
that
regard
indefinitely,
regardless
of
the
pandemic.
A
Okay,
well
next,
we
will
hear
testimony
in
support
of
ab110
broadcasting
if
we,
if
we
have
anyone
on
the
line
to
testify
and
support.
G
Sure
this
is
michael
from
broadcast.
Let
me
check,
I
have
some
callers
and
I'll
find
out
which
position
they
hold.
A
Thank
you,
and,
and
while
we're
waiting
just
want
to
remind
everyone
to,
please
reduce
your
comments
in
support
or
opposition
or
neutral
to
two
minutes
per
person.
G
G
G
H
A
I
I
I
will
let
broadcasting,
because
we
don't
want
to
lose
you
broadcasting.
Is
there
a
way
to
get
her
back
in
the
queue
or
technically?
Is
it
better
to
let
her
make
her
comment
now.
G
G
H
H
It's
a
little
more
difficult
for
you
to
ignore
me
when
I
ride
up
on
an
elevator
with
you
or
in
the
case
of
chair
miller,
when
I
hang
out
right
in
front
of
your
office
in
those
comfy
chairs,
and
I
ask
you
how
your
kids
are,
how
your
small
business
is
doing
or
how
your
drive
up
from
las
vegas.
Was
this
humanizes
me?
H
The
short
little
conversations
can
turn
into
respect
and
a
longer
conversation
on
my
subject
matter
expertise-
and
this,
of
course,
is
the
basis
of
lobbying
in
the
past
three
hundred
dollars
for
the
privilege
of
that
access
was
well
worth
it
for
a
small
non-profit
like
mine.
Three
hundred
dollars
is
a
significant
fee,
but
our
organization
does
not
have
the
ability
to
buy
access
through
campaign
donations,
like
others,
can
the
way
the
81st
session
is
operating
thus
far,
and
if
you
pass
this
bill
has
created
an
unfair
two-tier
system
for
lobbyists,
the
haves
and
have-nots.
H
I
don't
think
that's
what
you
want,
but
that's,
unfortunately,
what
you've
gotten.
What
will
my
organization
benefit
from
me
registering
and
paying
300
for
the
privilege
of
participation
in
this
broken
system?
Will
you
guarantee
I
can
get
a
zoom
call
with
every
legislator
on
the
health,
human,
health
and
human
services
committee?
Will
you
guarantee
that
I
always
get
my
two
minutes
after
hanging
out
on
phone
limbo
for
two
hours?
H
Really,
here's
the
thing
open.
The
building
policy
and
lawmaking
is
happening
without
the
benefit
of
human
interaction
with
lobbyists
who
are
without
without
interaction,
you're
crafting
our
future,
and
you
benefit
from
the
interaction
one
to
another
of
you,
people
who
are
sitting
on
zoom
but
are
sitting
right
next
to
each
other
in
an
office.
You
you
benefit
from
lobbyists
like
me,
for.
A
H
A
H
A
G
G
Chair
at
this
time,
the
two
callers
that
are
here
have
not
raised
their
hand
for
any
of
the
three
positions
on
bill:
ab110,
so
they're,
probably
just
listening.
A
A
I
I
The
committee
typically
travels
to
rural
towns
around
the
state
holding
committee
meetings
and
conducting
informational
tours
these.
This
excuse
me.
These
visits
provide
legislators
the
opportunity
to
visit
with
local
state
and
federal
officials
and
provide
members
of
the
committee
the
ability
to
hear
directly
from
citizens
of
each
community.
I
Excuse
me
going
into
the
last
interim.
The
committee
had
planned
to
emphasize
the
state's
cooperation
with
native
american
tribes
throughout
nevada.
Though
many
of
those
plans
were
derailed,
including
a
potential
committee
meeting
at
a
tribal
facility.
We
were
able
to
hold
virtual
meetings
that
included
the
reno
sparks
indian
colony,
the
las
vegas
paiute
pride
and
members
of
the
eastern
shoshone
hawaii
joint
testimony
presented
at
various
meetings
throughout
the
interim
by
members
of
the
tribes
offered
a
unique
perspective
concerning
the
management
nevada's
public
lands
based
on
a
recommendation
for
legislation
submitted
by
assemblyman
howard
watts.
I
I
Excuse
me,
four
members
of
the
senate,
four
members
of
the
assembly
and
one
elected
officer
representing
the
governing
body
of
a
local
government
with
the
addition
of
one
tribal
member
member,
the
committee
will
have
10
members.
I
I
In
conclusion,
providing
a
tribal
voice
on
the
public
lands
committee
will
offer
a
significant
opportunity
for
the
legislature
and
nevada's
tribes
to
better
cooperate
on
public
lands
issue.
I
ask
for
your
support
for
assembly
bill
95
with
that.
I
look
forward
to
answering
your
questions.
Thank
you
for
the
full
privilege
of
your
time.
I
F
Thank
you
so
much,
madam
chair,
my
my
chat
still
isn't
working.
I
just
have
one
quick
question
and
I
hope
I'm
doing
the
edition
right,
but
it
looks
to
me
like
it
makes
this
committee
10
members
now
is
that
right.
I
David
parks
for
the
record,
I
think
what
we
have
under
situations
where
we
have
an
even
number
of
individuals,
and
I
might
also
add
that
over
the
many
years
that
I've
served
on
the
committee,
that
there
are
seldom
or
recommendations
of
bdrs,
that
would
end
up
having
a
tied
bow.
But,
as
we
understand,
is
considered
not
passing.
A
I
actually
have
a
brief
question.
I'm
just
curious:
how
often
does
this
committee
meet
like
annually
or
throughout
the
interim?
How
often.
I
Well,
madame's,
here
david
parks
for
the
record.
This
is
one
of
the
interim
committees
that
meets
beginning
in
late
summer
of
odd
numbered,
and
we
have
a
relatively
short
period
of
time
in
which
to
have
our
hearings
and
then
make
our
recommendations,
which
includes
up
to
10
ddrs
for
consideration
by
the
subsequent
legislative
session.
A
Members
any
additional
questions:
okay,
well,
not
seeing
any
additional
questions
at
the
time
we
will
go
ahead
and
hear
from
support
for
ab95
broadcasting.
Do
we
have
collards
ready
to
testify
and
support.
G
A
A
In
support
ms
lyons.
A
I'm
I'm
sorry
couldn't
hear
that
you
have
also.
A
Yes
and
I
had
introduce
her,
but
I
wasn't
sure
if
she
was
speaking
as
well-
miss
mc
mcdade
williams.
Would
you
like
to
speak
because
I
see
you
so
committed
as
you're
in
your
car
so
committed.
J
Thank
you,
madam
chair
good
afternoon,
to
you
and
members
of
the
committee
for
the
record,
I'm
marla
mcgate
williams,
with
strategies
360.,
and
I
am
testifying
today
from
winamaka
on
my
way
to
elko.
So
thank
you
for
indulging
me
today.
I'm
honored
to
be
here
to
present
this
bill
with
senator
parks
and
on
behalf
of
the
reno
sparks
indian
colony.
I
also
want
to
extend
our
appreciation
to
assembly
member
howard
watts
for
making
the
recommendation.
During
the
interim.
J
We
were
thankful
for
the
opportunity
to
present
to
the
legislative
committee
on
public
lands
and
during
our
presentation
to
members
of
the
committee,
we
discuss
the
resources
and
coordination
needed
to
manage
land
within
the
reservation's
boundaries.
The
adjacency
to
county
and
city
boundaries
requires
extensive
coordination
with
various
local
governments.
Having
a
travel
representative
on
this
committee
will
help
strengthen
relation
relationships
between
state
and
local
and
tribal
governments.
J
The
inter-tribal
council
of
nevada
has
access
to
all
of
the
elected
members
of
nevada's
27
reservations
and
colonies
and
through
executive
director
desiree
quintana,
I'm
confident
the
itcn
can
successfully
appoint
a
representative
that
will
be
able
to
fully
participate
on
the
committee.
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
A
Well,
not
seen
any
additional
questions
so
with
that.
Thank
you
so
much.
I
think
we
all
appreciate
how
difficult
it
is
to
testify
from
the
car,
but
thank
you
so
much
for
joining
us
today.
With
that
broadcasting
do
we
have
people
calling
into
testifying
support.
G
G
G
K
Excellent,
thank
you,
hello.
I'm
will
adler
w-I-l-l-a-d-l-e-r,
I
self-identify
as
a
lobbyist,
despite
the
current
legal
status
of
logging
and
I'm
with
silver
state
government
relations
and
we're
here
representing
pyramid
lake
paiute,
tribe
pyramid
lake
paiute
tribe
would
like
to
support
in
full
support
of
this
bill
and
everything
it
wants
to
accomplish
and
everything
it
it
it
deems
to
do.
Pyramid
lake
thinks
this
is
a
long
overdue
change
to
the
public
lands
committee,
and
that
is
a
very
possible.
So
please
do
support
this
bill
and
thank
you
very
much.
G
G
G
B
S-A-U-N-D-E-R-S
and
I'm
the
policy
director
with
the
progressive
leadership
alliance
of
nevada
here
in
support
of
assembly,
bill
95,
to
add
a
member
recommended
by
inter-tribal
council
of
nevada
to
the
legislative
committee
on
public
lands.
These
public
lands
are,
in
fact,
all
stolen
lands
that
our
indigenous
neighbors
have
been
stewards
of
for
generations.
Membership
on
the
legislative
committee
will
bring
the
knowledge
of
nevada's
many
tribes,
who
should
be
at
the
forefront
when
crafting
policies
would
impact
the
earth.
We
urge
you
yes,
so
thank
you.
G
K
Hello,
my
name
is
kyle
davis,
that's
k,
y
l
e
d,
a
v
I
s
and
I'm
here
today
on
behalf
of
the
nevada
conservation
league.
The
nevada
conservation
league
is
in
support
of
ab95,
and
we
appreciate
the
public
lands
committee
and
assembly
assembly
member
watts
for
bringing
the
the
bill
forward.
Nevada's
indigenous
communities
have
been
living
on
and
stewarding
the
lands
for
generations
and
continue
to
do
so.
Today,
the
land
we
are
discussing
is
their
land.
K
B
B
G
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
So
again,
I
just
would
like
to
thank
you
so
much
senator
parks
for
coming
and
presenting
this
bill
and
ms
mcdade
williams.
Thank
you
so
much
as
well,
both
of
you.
It's
a
pleasure
to
see
you
and
with
that
I
will
close
the
hearing
on
av
95..
A
Next,
we
will
move
to
our
next
agenda
item,
which
is
a
public
comment,
and
so
with
public
comment.
Again
would
like
to
remind
everyone
that
public
comment
is
to
make
a
comment
on
something
that
falls
within
the
purview
of
this
committee.
It
will
public
comment.
Per
person
will
also
be
limited
to
two
minutes,
a
person.