►
From YouTube: 5/14/2021 - Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
Two
for
open
right,
one
for
clothes;
okay,
got
it
good
morning,
everyone
and
welcome
to
this
edition
of
the
commerce
and
labor
senate
commerce
and
labor
committee
for
the
81st
session
of
the
nevada
legislature.
A
Thank
you.
Let
the
record
show
that
all
members
are
present.
We
have
several
items
on
our
work
session
document
today.
We
will
not
be
hearing
any
bills.
I
believe
we
have
gotten
all
of
those
done,
so
we
will
just
be
doing
work
session
today
and
just
want
to
let
everybody
know.
We
are
we're
now
in
the
twilight
zone,
senator
pinkert
and
I
both
decided
to
wear
purple
and
senator
sotomayor,
and
I
both
thought
about
a
consent
agenda
so
welcome
to
the
twilight
zone.
A
So
with
that
we're
gonna,
we
there's
some
of
the
items.
Many
of
the
items
were
oh
well.
Maybe
it's
not
the
toilet
zone,
maybe
we're
just
all
on
one
accord.
Now
you
think
so,
okay
right
so
we've
got
several
items
that
bills
that
came
out
and
there
were
no
agendas.
C
A
There
were
agendas,
but
there
were
no
amendments
and
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
I'd
like
to
take
those
items
with
no
agent
with
no
amendments
I
like
to
take
them
as
a
one
as
a
consent
agenda,
mr
melanejo
will
read
the
bills
and
after
he
reads
the
bills,
I
will
open
it
up
for
questions
or
comments
by
committee
members
and
once
we
do
that,
then
we
will
vote
on
those
as
one
consent,
one
consent
item
and
then
we'll
move
on
to
the
next
committee
members.
Does
anybody
have
any
concern?
Heartburn?
A
D
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
In
that
respect,
I
gave
you
the
ones
that
some
individuals
have
requested
me
to
pull
out
and
just
for
clarification
that
was
51,
207
and
222.
The
rest,
I
think,
are
definitely
good
bills.
Thank
you.
A
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
cesar
mcgregor
community
policy.
Analyst
for
the
record
these
next
four
bills
are.
The
motion
would
be
a
do
pass
as
they
don't
have
any
amendments
and
they
are
assembly
bill
91,
which
revises
provisions
relating
to
the
state
board
of
nursing
sponsored
by
assemblywoman
benitez
tom
thompson
assembly
bill
130
revises
provisions
governing
insurance
and
sponsored
by
assemblyman
flores
at
all
assembly.
Bill
190
provides
certain
employees
with
the
right
to
use
sick
leave
to
assist
certain
family
members
with
medical
needs
sponsored
by
the
assembly
committee
and
commerce
and
labor.
E
A
A
We'll
work
out
the
floor
statements
a
little
later
and
we'll
just
keep
moving
on.
Is
that?
Okay,
all
right,
mr
melanie
hill
and-
and
let
me
let
me
say
this-
for
those
who
who
may
be
watching
part
of
the
reason
that
I
thought
that
this
would
make
sense
this
morning
and
senator
suttleman
agreed
with
me-
is
that
we've
got
people
who
have
to
present
in
other
committees
and
rather
than
stopping
and
starting,
and
that
sort
of
thing
it
just
seemed
like
it
would
be
a
better
use
of
our
time.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
cesar
margaret
committee
policy.
Analyst
for
the
record.
That's
correct.
The
next
group
of
bills
will
be
a
motion
for
a
men
do
pass
as
they
have
several
amendments
which
are
all
included
either
on
the
work
session
document
or
as
attached
or
both,
for
example,
ab2
90.
Just
for
the
members,
clarification
there's
no
attachment,
but
the
amendment
is
on
the
workstation
document.
Okay,
and
with
that,
the
first
bill
is
assembly,
bill
250,
which
revises
provisions
relating
to
insurance
to
supplement
the
medicare
sponsored
by
assemblywoman
how
to
get
at
all.
E
Assembly
bill
290,
revises
provisions
relating
to
financial
institutions
and
sponsored
by
assemblywoman
harigi
family
bill.
298
revises
provisions
relating
to
non-commercial
vehicle
leases,
sponsored
by
assemblyman
flores.
E
Assembly
bill
391,
revises
provisions
relating
to
dispensing
opticians
and
sponsored
by
assemblywoman,
anderson
and
finally
assembly
bill.
436
revises
provisions
relating
to
vision,
care
and
sponsored
by
assembly
committee
on
commerce
and
labor
and
beneficiary.
Once
again,
the
motion
would
be
a
men
do
pass.
A
I
have
a
motion:
senator
sotomayor
was
that
senator
marx
in
settlement
and
a
second
senator
lang,
additional
questions
and
and
if
you
have
questions
on
the
amendments
or
what
any
anything
relative
to
the
specificity
of
them,
don't
be
afraid
to
ask.
Now
I
don't
see
okay,
all
right,
madam
secretary,
please
do
a
roll
call
vote.
F
C
B
A
A
So
let
the
records
show
that
second
consent
agenda
passes
unanimously
and
with
that
let
me
give
it
back
to
mr
megurejo
and
we'll
continue
with
some
with
the
other
bills
that
we
may
have
may
or
may
not
have
discussion
on.
So
mr
megalejo.
E
Thank
you,
chair
spearman,
cesar
monreal
committee
policy.
Analyst,
for
the
record,
there
are
two
bills
that
were
not
part
of
of
either
the
consensus
votes.
The
first
bill
is
assembly
bill
207,
which
provides
that
certain
businesses
which
offer
goods
or
services
through
an
internet
website,
mobile
application
or
other
electronic
medium
are
places
of
public
accommodation
and
sponsored
by
assemblyman
watts
iii
at
all,
and
there
are
some
amendments
included
in
the
mockup
that's
attached.
E
The
first
amendment
is
the
subsection
3b
of
section
1
to
revise
the
definition
of
online
establishment
to
provide
that
an
online
establishment
does
not
include
a
business
that
is
operated
in
conjunction
with
a
physical
location
which
is
open
to
the
public,
and
the
second
amendment
is
to
amend
subsection
4
of
section
1,
to
revise
the
definition
of
place
of
public
accommodation,
so
that
the
only
change
is
to
include
an
online
establishment
and
man.
I'm
sure.
That's
all
the
amendments.
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
While
I
certainly
appreciate
and
and
agree
with
the
intent
of
the
bill,
I
think
that
the
changes
that
we're
talking
about
are
going
to
greatly
expand
the
definition
of
public
accommodation,
and
I
think
this
opens
employers
to
suit
and
their
premises
for
for
things
that
really
have
nothing
to
do
with
the
bill,
and
so
I'll
be
a
no
on
this.
Thank
you.
A
A
You
know
I
have
to
tell
you:
senator
ratty
sits
in
this
seat
the
day
before
we
meet
in
the
last
committee
and
I'm
telling
you
something
is
about
this
seat.
That
says
now
I
don't
know
so
I'll
entertain
a
motion.
Let
me
do
that
motion
so
moved.
Okay,
I
have
a
motion
by
senator
cyborg.
Do
I
have
a
second.
A
F
A
Yes
and
let
the
record
show
that
the
motion
does
pass
unanimously.
Mr
mcgregor.
E
Hey
thank
you,
madam
chair,
for
record
cesar
mcgregor
community
policy.
Analyst.
Our
next
bill
for
the
agenda
is
assembly
bill
222,
which
revises
provisions
governing
employment
practices
and
was
sponsored
by
assemblywoman
taurus.
E
There
is
an
amendment
attached
to
this
work
session
document
and
the
amendment
is
to
delete
paragraph
c
of
subsection
2
of
section
1,
which
expressly
authorizes
an
employee
who
suffers
certain
unlawful
employment
practices
and
brings
a
civil
action
against
the
employer
to
obtain
damages
equal
to
the
amount
of
the
lost
wages
and
benefits
manager.
That's
all
the
amendments.
A
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
for
the
record
will
keen
committee
council.
The
amendment
would
remove
the
item,
which
specifically
provides
for
damages
equal
to
the
amount
of
lost
wages
and
benefits.
C
However,
the
employee
is
still
able
to
bring
the
suit
and
according
to
2d
for
any
past
or
future
compensatory
damages,
which
would
have
to
be
shown
in
court
and
there's
several
cases
that
that
relate
to
this
bill
and
the
bill
puts
in
statute
various
provisions
that
are
discussed
in
those
court.
B
A
We
have
any
questions
questions,
madam
yes,.
B
C
Thank
you.
My
vice
chair
for
the
record
will
keen
community
council
well,
the
specific
item
for
damage
is
equal
to
the
amount
of
lost
wages
and
benefits
has
been
removed.
However,
as
in
most
tort
actions,
a
claimant
can
improve
damages
and
compensatory
damages
can
be
specific
damages,
specific
items
that
are
lost.
That
can
be
specifically
enumerated,
but
they
can
also
be
items
such
as
emotional
distress.
Other
items
like
that
compensatory
damages
are
very
broad.
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm
clear
on
the
amendment
that,
though
it
would
limit
it
to
lost
wages
and
benefits.
It
retains
the
part
in
section
1,
2
d,
that
it
would
include
future
compensatory
damages
without
limitation.
Is
that.
A
C
I'm
happy
to
answer
that
question.
Yes,
senator
picker
item
section,
one
subsection,
two
paragraph
d
is
still
in
the
bill
and
it
would
allow
for
compensatory
damages
past
the
future.
Of
course,
those
would
have
been
in
court
as
in
any
other
case
they
have
to
prove
it.
F
Sure
sure
I
appreciate
that
and-
and
I
suspect
the
judges
will
be
a
little
skeptical
about
you-
know
future
damages
at
infinite,
but
my
concern,
madam
chair,
is
actually
that
this
will
encourage
disgruntled
employees
to
bring
suit
and
it
will
drive
up
the
costs
of
business
so
I'll
be
in
now.
Thank
you.
D
D
D
A
I'm
going
to
ask
I'm
going
to
ask
mr
keane
to
weigh
in
because
I
met
with
the
sponsor
and
also
met
with
those
in
opposition
and
trying
to
trying
to
decide
for
myself
what
what
this
would
look
like
and,
as
I
understand
there
was,
there
was
a
case
and
the
language
that
is
currently
in
the
bill
supports
the
language
of
the
case
or
that
language
supports
the
bill.
I
just
need
to
be
clear:
okay,
mr
keene.
C
Thank
you,
chair
spearman,
for
the
record
will
keen
committee
council.
The
two
cases
that
are
mentioned
in
the
digest
are
both
relevant
to
to
this
bill.
So
the
wiltsey
case,
the
first
one
was
a
circumstance
where
the
nevada
supreme
court
determined
that
there
was
a
public
policy.
C
However,
in
that
case,
the
employee
who
reported
the
conduct,
did
not
report
it
to
an
outside
entity,
an
outside
enforcement
agency
instead
just
reported
it
to
his
supervisor,
and
so
the
court
said
that,
while
the
court
was
going
to
impute
a
public
policy
of
supporting
whistleblowers,
the
court
would
not
go
so
far
as
to
say
that
a
worker
who
simply
supported
or
simply
reported
illegal
conduct
to
his
supervisor
would
get
that
protection,
so
unfortunately,
unfortunately,
for
the
employee.
In
that
case,
he
was
not
protected
because
he
did
not
report
it
to
an
outside
entity.
C
This
bill
in
part
codifies
that
decision
puts
in
statute
the
public
policy
that
was
enunciated
by
the
nevada
supreme
court,
but
also
extends
it
in
giving
the
whistleblower
protection
to
a
person,
as
would
have
happened
in
the
wiltsy
case.
C
A
person
who
reports
to
a
supervisor
that
illegal
activity
in
the
alum
case
there
was
an
employee
who
reported
his
activity
or
reported
the
activity
to
the
outside
entity.
That
was
a
an
entity
that
could
take
action.
It
was
an
enforcement
entity.
However,
it
turned
out
that
that
the
conduct
did
not
seem
to
be
as
problematic
as
the
employee
thought.
C
It
was,
and
in
that
case,
the
the
supreme
court
once
again
operating
on
public
policy
grounds,
as
opposed
to
looking
at
a
specific
nevada
statute,
determined
that
many
of
the
employees
claim
should
have
been
given
more
consideration,
and
so
this
what
this
statute
does
is
it
takes
ideas
from
those
two
cases
and
puts
them
directly
in
statute,
and
that
will
serve
a
number
of
purposes,
but
one
of
which
will
give
a
statutory
basis
going
forward
for
the
courts
to
interpret
these
actions.
C
Many
of
the
concerns
are
brought
up
at
the
hearing
about
what
will
cut
what
will
constitute
unsafe
conduct.
Can
employees
stop
working?
What's
a
reasonable
belief?
Those
will
all
be
fleshed
out
by
the
courts
under
the
statute
and
a
body
of
case
law
will
come
forward
so
that
over
time,
attorneys
who
potentially
represent
employees,
will
have
a
very
good
idea
about
what
cases
should
and
should
not
be
brought,
as
the
court
fleshes
out
these
ideas,
but
certainly
these
are
all
this
is
a.
C
This
is
a
basis
that
the
courts
can
then
build
upon
to
flesh
out
all
these
different
concepts.
Thank
you.
F
You
know
the
the
wiltsy
case
was
about
a
whistleblower
and
the
whistleblower
statutes
in
nevada
were
clear
enough
to
support
the
the
court's
findings,
but
the
the
parts
that
I
really
struggle
with
and
after
talking
to
several
business
or
commercial
litigation,
attorneys
the
I
don't
wanna
say
consensus,
but
our
feeling
was
that
the
provisions
under
section
one
sub
two
particularly
reinstatement
without
loss
of
position,
seniority
or
benefits-
would
force
an
employer
to
take
an
employee
back.
F
That
would
then
have
an
axe
to
grind
and
could
open
some
really
serious
doors
for
them,
and
that
would
be
reinstatement
without
their
control,
which
I
think
is
contrary
to
public
policy
in
in
private
businesses
and
then
the
future
compensatory
damages.
Of
course
they
would
need
to
be
proven.
F
Were
we
to
follow
history
and
say
you
know
you're
entitled
to
damages
I'd.
I'd
be
perfectly
okay
with
this
bill,
but
this
goes
so
much
farther
and
and
really
in
my
mind
and
in
the
mind
of
those
that
I
spoke
to,
creates
a
definite
incentive
for
disgruntled
employees
to
really
create
havoc
in
business,
although
they
may
be
relatively
small
in
number
it's
going
to
affect
whatever
the
prices
are,
that
that
business
has
to
charge,
and
so
I
think,
because
this
is
a
significant
expansion.
B
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I've
been
talking
to
the
sponsor
about
this
bill
and
I
understand
the
the
position
of
the
business
community
in
regards
to
they
have
issues
with
section
one.
I
it's
my
understanding
that
she's
still
she's
still
trying
to
work,
get
this
out
of
committee
and
potentially
try
to
do
a
floor
amendment
that
section
so
I
am
leaning
towards
supporting
her
with
the
reservation.
B
B
So
I
am
I'm
going
to
vote
yes
and
hope
that
she
can
find
a
place
with
a
different
standard
with
the
other
parties.
F
No,
madam
chair,
I
just
I
guess
I'm
just
slightly
on
the
other
side,
I'm
no!
But
if
that
amendment
comes
through
and
and
softens
the
harshness
of
this,
I
might
vote
yes
on
the
floor,
but
I'll
wait
to
see
what
comes
out
in
the
floor
amendment.
Thank
you.
A
Anyone
else
so
yeah,
I
I
did
see
an
amendment
from
miss
grimmer
and
I
ran
that
by
our
council
to
see
if
that
would
comport
with
the
intent
of
the
bill
and
it
would
basically
erase
it
I'm
I'm
coming
on
the
same
side
as
vice
chair
neil
I'd
really
like
to
see
some
type
of
compromise,
and-
and
that
is
because
I
I
am
sensitive
to
what
businesses
have
gone
through
and
I'm
also
sensitive
to
what
happens
when
we
don't
take
a
lot
of
things
into
consideration
from
an
employee
standpoint,
and
I
think
the
I
think
the
example
that
was
given
when
I
met
with
the
those
in
opposition
the
example
that
was
given
was
if
someone
is
working
next
to
someone
who
doesn't
have
a
face
mask
on
and
they
think
that
that's
a
safety
violation.
A
If
I
were
that
person
having
been
in
icu,
I
would
probably
say
yeah
because
I
don't
want
to
go
back,
but
I
also
understand
what
senator
settlemyre
said.
I
think
you
used
the
ranch,
and
your
daughter
says,
is
that
this
is
unsafe
and
you
say
no.
This
is
kind
of
the
way
we
do
it.
A
A
Of
those
who
who
have
raised
those
concerns-
and
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
has
happened
this
session
is
many
of
the
bills
that
have
come
through,
not
just
here
in
this
committee,
but
have
come
through
many
committees
is
trying
to
balance
the
needs
of
both
and
I'm
of
the
opinion
that
they
are
not
mutually
exclusive.
A
I'm
of
the
opinion
that
it's
not
one
person
has
to
win
it
all
and
the
other
person
lose
it
all.
I'm
of
the
opinion
that
there's
got
to
be
some
type
of
a
middle
ground,
that's
with
this
bill,
and
then
there
are
other
bills
that
want
to
put
things
in
statute
that
will
protect
not
just
employees,
but
that
will
also
protect
homeowners.
A
A
So
all
right,
she
can
come
down
in
about
five
minutes
and
why
don't
we
take
a?
We
got
another
one
yeah.
So
we'll
we'll
pause
this
one
we'll
pause
on
222
and
we'll
go
to
assembly
bill
51.
D
E
Analyst
and
my
apologies-
I
missed
the
bill
assembly
bill
51,
which
is
the
top
of
the
batting
roster
assembly
bill.
51,
revises
provisions
governing
the
recovery
fund
administered
by
the
state
contractor's
board
and
is
sponsored
by
assembly
committee
on
commerce
and
labor
on
behalf
of
the
state
contractor's
board,
and
there
are
no
amendments
to
this
measure.
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
We
had
discussed
an
amendment,
I'm
concerned
about
the
breadth,
well,
the
narrowing
of
of
who
might
be
eligible
and
then
the
the
expansion
of
this
so
I'll
be
in
no
seeing
no
amendment
I'll
be
you
know.
A
Additional
comments,
questions,
okay,
not
a
secretary.
Please
do
a
roll
call
vote.
A
A
Yes
and
when
we
give
while
we're
on
this
one,
why
don't
we
give
this
center
language?
You
take
this
statement?
Okay,
thank
you.
So
the
motion
does
carry.
A
I
see,
assemblywoman
torres
has
come,
and
so,
if
you
can
come
to
the
to
the
table
and
there's
several
questions
regarding
what
this
would
or
would
not
do
with
respect
to
business
practices,
do
you
have
anyone
with
you
or
here
that
that
practices
in
this
particular
field?
Yes,.
A
All
right
so
senator
pickard
can
you
state-
and
I
don't
know
I
don't
know
if
he'd
been
following
but
but
state
one
moment:
oh,
they
have
to
get
him
on
well,
while
they're
doing
that.
Let
me
just
go
and
see
if
senator
picker,
if
you'll
restate
your
concerns
and
I
think
senator
hardy,
did
you
have?
No?
No,
you
were
jimmy
kimmel,
senator
sotomayor.
You
had
concerns
okay,
all
right.
Let's
begin
with
senator
pinkert,
while
they
get.
E
G
At
the
chair
would
like
to
give
me
an
additional
10
minutes.
I
will
figure
that
out
right
now.
I
thought
that
they
were
going
to
be
registered
for
today's
meeting,
but
I
can
get
that
dealt
with
immediately
and
he's
an
employment
lawyer,
so
it
might
be
best
if
we
can
hold
off
for
10
more
minutes.
I
apologize
here.
A
Right
so
we'll
what
we'll
do
is
we'll
go
back
through
the
bills
and
I'll
sign
floor
statements,
and
hopefully
they
will
we'll
be
able
to
get
mr
kemp
on
okay,
all
right
so
we'll
go
back
through
and
we
had
two
consent
agendas
and
did
not
assign
floor
statements.
So
let's
do
that
now,
mr
maverijo,
you
want
to
read
the
bill
again
and
I'll
assign
four
statements
after
that.
A
And
that
was
a
pass
I'll
take
that
statement.
E
Next
is
assembly.
Bill
190
provides
certain
employees
with
the
right
to
use
sick
leave,
and
this
was
sponsored
on
behalf
of
the
senior
citizens
veterans
and
adult
special
needs.
E
A
And
I
think
that
was
split,
senator
scheible
I'll
take
it!
Oh,
if
I
share
you,
take
it
now
I'll
I'll
come
right
back
to
you.
Okay,
I
don't
want
to
leave
you
out.
E
A
E
Somebody
built
250,
which
was
part
of
the
consent
calendar
for
a
men,
do
pass.
This
is
relating
to
insurance
to
supplement
medicare
sponsored
by
some
of
the
women
how
to
be.
E
E
A
E
Next
assembly
bill
330
gov
governing
occupational
training
and
licensing.
A
We
would
like
to
take
that
one.
Is
it
elaine?
Okay,
oh
cinder,
would
you
just
did
you
say,
okay,
senator
hardy,
that's
an.
E
Article
is
assembly
bill
359,
and
this
was
governing
trade
practices.
Practices
from
assemblywoman
constantine.
E
A
G
Thank
you
chair
some
of
the
choices
for
the
record.
Yes,
I
was
able
to
contact.
The
employment
lawyer
cannot
be
on
at
this
time.
You
know
if
the
committee
has
additional
questions,
I'm
more
than
happy
to
take
those
questions.
Right
now
go
speak
with
the
attorney
he's
currently
in
court
and
so
and
obviously
that
there's
very
few
employment
attorneys
here
in
the
city
of
nevada.
G
This
is
not
a
realm
where
we
have
an
abundance
of
resources,
so
unfortunately
he's
not
going
to
be
able
to
be
present
with
us
today,
but
I
can
thank
you,
those
questions
now
and
I
can
get
back
to
the
committee.
That's
all
I
can
do.
A
Right
senate
picker.
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
salmonella
torres
thanks
for
coming
down
the
question
or
the
the
concern
was
this
that
section
one
sub
two
really
expands
or
or
creates
an
incentive
for
disgruntled
attorneys
to
to
create
problems
that
wouldn't
have
existed
before
this,
in
that
reinstatement
of
loss
of
position,
seniority
or
benefits
over
the
objection
of
an
employer.
F
And
then
pastor,
particularly
future
compensatory
damages,
we've
always
had
the
ability
to
go
after
future
damages
that
can
be
proven,
but
this
essentially
invites
that
and
then
punitive
damages
is
something
that
we
generally
don't
see
in
in
private
civil
litigation
and
because
the
when
you
put
them
all
together,
the
employment
attorneys
that
are
my
go-to
people.
F
I
contacted
them
and
and
they're
all
acknowledging
that
this
is
likely
to
create
a
a
bit
of
an
incentive
for
the
disgruntled
employees,
and-
and
so
we
just
you
know,
but
I
understand
an
amendment
may
be
coming
and
if
that's
the
case-
and
we
can
soften
this,
I
may
be
a
yes
but
right
now.
I
can't
support
this
in
in
its
current
form,
but
that
was
my
concern.
G
Thank
you
for
the
question
or
the
concern
the
comment
senator
through
the
chair,
my
muscle
and
targets
for
the
record,
so
you
know
I
think,
let's
go
direct,
go
to
red.
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
it.
You
know,
I
think
that
might
be
a
policy
difference.
Quite
honestly,
but
I
can
tell
you
you
know:
I've
worked
pretty
extensively
with
the
businesses,
the
business
community
to
make
sure
that
we
are
being
this
close
to
case
law.
G
Part
of
the
issue
is
that
you
know
cur
law
like
the
current
case
law
that
exists
goes
through
osha
and
so
there
and
through
the
osha
war
there
are
ways
for
them
to
seek
those
damages,
and
so
now
we
have
to
find
a
way
to
codify
those
right
and
so
the
way
that
that's
being
done.
I
think
that
there
is
a
there's,
a
disagreement,
but
you
know
there's
still
the
possibility
of
another
amendment
before
this
bill
gets
voted
on
the
floor
and
I'm
committed
to
continuing
to
work
with
the
stakeholders.
F
Sure-
and
I
appreciate
that-
I
think
that
much
or
there
are
parts
of
this
bill
that
are
very
good-
osha
is
you're,
it's
a
great
point,
they're
only
interested
in
safety
and
there's
nothing
or
there's
very
little
in
the
osha
statute.
F
That
would
address
the
whistleblower
issues
that
this
addresses
and
I
think
those
are
good
ideas,
but,
to
the
extent
that
this
expands,
I
think
that's
the
concern
of
the
business
industry
and
since
those
costs
are
ultimately
passed
on
to
the
consumer,
that's
why
I
think
we're
probably
getting
the
push
back
and
that's
why
we're
concerned.
Thank
you.
G
Thank
you,
that's
a
little
choice
for
the
record,
so
you
know.
Obviously
my
concern,
though,
is
the
hard-working
nevada
families
right
now
that
are
unable
to
feel
unsafe
and
comfortable
with
the
work
and,
unfortunately,
I
think
the
large
amount.
G
You
know
my
community
and
my
district
people
talk
to
me
about
the
safety
issues
that
they
see
and
how
the
when
I
encourage
them
to
go,
speak
to
their
employer
about
those
safety
issues,
many
of
them
and
because
I
do
have
a
a
community
with
a
large
amount
of
construction
workers,
a
large
amount
of
casino
workers
and
a
lot
of
them.
G
You
know
expressed
me
that
they're
concerned
because
they
have
a
friend,
everybody
has
a
friend
in
our
community
and
they
have
a
friend
that
did
the
same
thing
and
they
lost
their
job,
and
so
this
piece
of
legislation
is
trying
to
do
that.
I
think
you
know.
During
the
hearing
we
heard
from
senators
that
expressed
that
you
know
we
would
like
to
have
policy
that
encourages
the
employees
to
report
to
the
employer.
G
The
unfortunate
reality
is
that
that
does
not
exist
right
now,
and
so
I'm
hoping
that
this
piece
of
legislation
encourages
individuals
to
report
to
their
employer
before
having
to
report
to
a
regulatory
agency
so
that
they
can
address
that
issue
right
away.
And
I'm
you
know
eager
to
continue
working
with
the
business
community
so
that
we
can
make
sure
that
it
makes
sense
for
all
hardworking
nevada
families.
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
think
the
assembly
woman
is
100,
correct,
it's
just
a
question
of
policy,
it's
a
different
policy
and
that's
it
and
frankly,
I
see
no
reason
to
continue
to
redo
a
hearing
when
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
change
the
vote.
Possibility
of
an
amendment
on
the
floor
may
change
people's
positions.
Otherwise
I
see
none.
D
It
is
an
inherently
dangerous
job
and
the
things
I
do
sometimes
a
lot
of
people
wouldn't
want
to
do
because
they're
unsafe,
and
I
get
that
and
that's
why
they
generally
choose
to
go,
find
a
job
that
is
less
dangerous,
which
is
usually
the
hospitality
industry
by
far
and
away
compared
to
agriculture,
because
in
the
middle
of
this
pandemic,
all
ag
still
had
to
show
up
because
for
some
reason,
cattle
think
they
need
to
be
fed
every
day
strange
thing,
but
in
that
respect
I'm
good.
I'm
opposed
to
the
bill.
A
Thank
you
so
we're
just
about
ready
to
take
the
vote,
and
some
people
maybe
may
not
understand
why
I
take
that
extra
time.
I
just
need
to
make
sure
that
everybody
knows
that
their
opinion
has
been
heard
and
that
we
will
in
some
way
or
another
address
it,
and
so
some
woman
I
before
you
got
here,
I
said
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
understood
that
there
was
an
an
ongoing
discussion
to
see
what
you
could
do
in
order
to
at
least
get
to
go.
A
So
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
vote
yes,
but
I'm
gonna
encourage
you
to
continue
to
talk
with
those
who
are
in
opposition
and
let's
see
what
happens
with
the
floor
amendment.
Okay,
all
right!
So
with
that
motion
I
have
a
motion.
A
A
B
B
A
Okay,
so
the
motion
does
carry
and
I'll
hold
up
on
the
floor
statement
until
we
see
the
amendment
and
you
get
a
chance,
just
try
to
huddle
you
and
those
who
are
in
opposition.
I
know
I
know
today's
the
last
day
and
whatever
time,
two
minutes
or
whatever,
let's
see.
G
G
You
chair
so
answers
for
the
record
and
just
all
the
stakeholders
know
I'm
continuing
to
working
with
stakeholders.
I
think
we
actually
have
a
video
already
scheduled
monday
for
this
piece
of
legislation
and
so
that
we
can
get
everybody
into
the
room
and
accomplish
exactly
what.
I
think
that
the
committee
is
encouraging
me
to
accomplish.
A
And
so
let's
go
to
the
phones
to
public
comment
broadcast.
Do
we
have
anybody
there
for
public.
A
E
B
A
Thank
you
just
a
couple
more
seconds,
just
in
case
someone
was
having
technical
difficulty.
A
A
Okay,
thanks
so
much
so
at
this
point
it
appears
that
we
have
done
the
work
that
the
people
sent
us
here
to
do.
I
acknowledge
the
fact
that
I
think
we
had
90
bills,
90
bills,
that
we
processed
60
from
the
senate
and
30
from
the
assembly.
A
I
think
we,
I
believe
it
is
my
opinion
that
we
did
a
pretty
good
job,
vetting
them
and
making
sure
everyone's
concerns
were
heard.
I
want
to
give
a
big
thank
you
to
all
of
the
staff
some
of
them.
You
see
some
of
them,
you
don't
who
have
worked
diligently
to
make
sure
that
this
goes
off.
The
way
that
it
should
committee
managers,
secretaries,
our
legal
counsel,
everyone,
so
I
want
to
give
a
big
thank
you
to
them.
A
And
the
next
thing
I
want
to
do,
I
want
to
give
a
big
thank
you
to
the
committee.
I
don't
care
how
good
the
quarterback
is.
If
you
don't
have
somebody,
that's
catching
the
balls
you're
still
not
going
to
win.
So
it
is
my
profound.
You
have
my
profound
gratitude
for
all
the
work
that
we've
done.
We
didn't
agree
all
the
time,
but
the
one
thing
that
we
didn't
do
we
didn't
become
disagreeable
and
if
we
have
any
footage
of
that,
we
probably
want
to
send
it
to
washington
anyway.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
So
much
team,
thank
you
and
with
that
we
will
be
in
adjourned
if
there
are
other
bills
that
come
our
way
that
are
not
subject
to
rule
40.
We
will
call
back
again,
but
we
are
adjourning.
Senator
neil,
I
mean
I'm
sorry.