►
From YouTube: 5/4/2021 - Senate Committee on Judiciary
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
All
right,
then,
I
will
call
this
meeting
of
the
senate
judiciary
committee
to
order
it
looks
like
we
will
be
starting
in
a
subcommittee
of
the
judiciary.
If
the
esteem
secretary
would
please
take
the
role.
A
C
A
A
I
assume
he
will
be
joining
us
shortly
at
feed
mark
and
present
when
he
arrives,
senator
hansen
senator
pickard
again.
I
assume
he
will
be
joining
us
and
ask
the
emarking
president
when
he
arrives
here.
Scheible,
oh-
and
I
am
here
and
so
is
senator
pickard.
You
can
mark
him
present
now
and
with
four
of
us
that
does
create
a
quorum,
so
we
will
go
directly
into
a
meeting
of
the
senate
judiciary
committee.
We
have
two
bills
to
hear
today
from
our
wonderful
colleagues
over
on
the
assembly
side.
A
Do
you
have
a
preference
for
order?
Okay,
let's
go
ahead
and
take
ab113.
First
then,
and
I
will
now
open
the
hearing
on.
A
C
Okay,
good
afternoon,
chair
scheibel
and
members
of
the
senate
judiciary
committee
for
the
record,
I'm
melissa
hardy
and
I
represent
assembly
district
22
in
clark
county,
and
I
want
to
thank
you
for
considering
assembly
bill
113,
which
extends
the
statute
of
limitations
for
prosecution
of
sex
trafficking.
C
C
I
had
the
privilege
over
the
interim
of
working
with
a
group
of
unlv
boyd
law,
school
law,
school
students
with
an
organization
called
policy
and
legislation,
society
of
which
my
daughter
served
as
president
this
past
year
and
during
they
started
a
competition
called
making
the
law
competition
and
during
the
inaugural
competition,
miss
polio
presented
a
bill
in
the
semifinals,
and
some
of
us
in
this
room
were
judges
for
that
competition,
and
this
was
one
of
the
bills
that
was
presented
and
when
I
heard
this
bill
after
I'm
preparing
to
come
to
session.
C
I
talked
with
ms
bolio
and
asked
if
she
would
be
amenable
to
me
carrying
this
this
bill
during
the
session.
And
she
graciously
said
yes.
And
so
I
want
to
thank
her
for
all
of
her
work
and
research
on
this
subject
and
in
preparing
for
this
hearing
and
for
the
hearing
in
the
assembly.
C
So
I
would
like
to
turn
it
over.
First
to
ms
bolio
and
she's,
a
senior
staffer
at
nevada
law
journal
and
a
at
unlv
jurisdiction,
school
of
law
and
will
soon
be
graduating
a
couple
of
weeks
and
following
her
presentation-
and
I
would
like
mr
brian
schwartz
from
the
da's
office
to
go
through
the
bill
and
discuss
on
the
bill.
And
hopefully
you
do
have
the
first
reprint
as
it
was
amended
over
on
assembly
side.
So
if
that's
okay,
I'd
ask
miss
bolio
to
give
her
remarks.
A
B
B
B
Rather
it's
through
intense
and
intentional
psychological
abuse
and
manipulation
that
takes
years
to
undo
to
start
traffickers
target
the
most
vulnerable
individuals
generally,
people
who
lack
a
broader
support
system,
and
also
usually
people
who
already
have
a
history
of
other
types
of
complex
trauma
and
abuse.
Cafe.
B
C
You
thank
you,
miss
thank
you,
miss
bolio,
for
sharing
that
information,
and
now,
if
I
could
have
mr
schwartz
from
the
d.a
go
through
the
bill
and
then
we
can
take
any
questions.
D
Good
afternoon,
everyone,
brian
schwartz,
from
the
district
attorney's
office,
I
work
in
the
special
victims
unit
here
and
one
of
two
deputies
that
are
handling
the
sex
trafficking
cases.
Right
now,
and
I
echo
everything
ms
bolio
said
about
the
reasons
why
this
would
be
important.
We
we
see
a
lot
of
cases
where
it
does
take
a
lot
more
time
for
victims
to
feel
comfortable
and
get
to
a
place
where
they
are
ready
to
talk
about
it
and
be
involved
in
the
prosecution.
D
So
we
definitely
see
the
the
fear,
the
manipulation,
the
control
and
all
those
different
factors
that
she
addressed
very
very
frequently
with
with
the
victims
that
we
interact
with
and
and
try
to
prosecute
on.
Behalf
of
so
I
apologize,
if
I
do
it
wrong
when
I'm
reading
through
it,
but
I
know
that
we
had
amended
to
remove
sections
one.
Two
and
three
of
the
bill
and
and
section
three
would
be
amended
to
be
a
six-year
statute
of
limitations
for
for
sex
trafficking.
D
Sex
trafficking
must
be
found
or
an
information
or
complaint
filed
within
six
years
after
the
commission
of
the
offense
will
be
extended
from
four
years
to
six
years
and
if,
if
there's
any
additional
questions
or
thoughts
that
I
could
be
be
of
use
to
answer,
I'd
be
happy
to.
E
D
That's
a
great
question.
I
wish
I
had
the
statistics
for
you
on
that.
I
would
say
as
far
as
sex
trafficking
cases
we're
receiving,
I
wouldn't
know
the
year,
but
we're
getting
new
ones.
I'd
say
on
a
weekly
basis
and
me
and
pete
is
another
individual
who's
handling
him
and
I'd
say
we
are
at
least
getting
see
two
a
week.
I'd
say
about
10
a
month
at
the
least,
but
I
could
definitely
provide
some
more
concrete
statistics
for,
for.
E
The
committee,
so
you
say
you
just
said
10
a
month
or
10
a
week,
I
would
say
at
least
10
a
month
so
about
120
cases
a
year,
then
roughly
okay,
and
how
many
have
you
had
that
where
you
could
have
possibly
prosecuted
them,
except
for
the
statute
of
limitations.
D
I'd
say
it's
hard
to
to
say
that,
because
we
don't
typically
get
cases
that
the
statute
of
limitation
has
already
run.
It
doesn't
get
to
us
at
that
point.
So
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
give
you
an
answer
on
that
one.
Unfortunately,.
E
Okay,
no
I'm
supportive
of
the
bill.
I'm
just
more
curious
about
some
of
the
statistics
on
some
of
this
stuff.
We
had.
We
had
a
bill
where
we're
going
to
now
allow
civil
prosecutions
for
businesses
that
have
allowed
things
like
this
to
go
on,
and
it's
almost
free
what
the
limitation
is,
but
it's
pretty
extensive,
the
six
years
that
was
that
done
after
I'm
kind
of
curious
as
to
why
you
only
added
two
years.
Instead
of
the
four
that
you
had
in
statute,
I
was
involved
with
the
bill.
D
Yeah,
I
think
that
was
a
concern
at
the
last
hearing
that
we
were
at
as
well,
why
we
didn't
have
a
longer
one.
D
I
know
that
all
of
us
in
support
of
the
bill
had
hoped
for
maybe
a
little
bit
more
time,
but
it
sounded
like
we
landed
on
the
two-year
extra
two
years
just
to
based
on
some
pushback
from
from
having
too
long
of
a
statute
of
limitations.
But
perhaps
maybe
someone
else
will
be
able
to
address
the
specifics,
but
that
was
my
understanding
of
why
we
kind
of
had
to
figure
out
where
the
middle
ground
would
be,
and
I
think
six
was
what
the
best
we
thought
we
could
do
at
this
point.
C
Obviously
I
would
like
it
to
be
longer,
but
you
know
this
is
like
he
said
from
pushback
and
some
negotiation
and
stuff
on
the
other
side.
This
is
where
we
landed
at
six
years.
You
know,
hopefully,
maybe
in
time
it
could
be
extended
and
miss
bolio.
You
know
she
agreed
when
I
originally
talked
to
her
about
this.
C
E
Oh,
my
god,
it's
a
reasonable
compromise.
This
way
I
mean
honestly,
you
know
you're
supposed
to
have
a
reasonably
speedy
trial
innocent
until
proven
guilty
and
that
sort
of
stuff
in
criminal
law.
So
it's
it's
a
little
touchy
on
how
how
far
you
can
you
can
extend
out
these
types
of
prosecutions.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
A
Thank
you
and
any
other
questions
also
wanted
just
a
little
bit
more
clarity,
not
on
the
six
years,
but
on
how
we
came
to
six
years,
and
it
occurs
to
me
in
reading
this
section
of
the
law.
Obviously
section
three
subsection
one
applies
to
a
whole
host
of
different
felonies,
but
sex
trafficking,
I
think,
is
the
only
one
listed
here
that
would
be
considered
an
ongoing
offense,
and
so
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
speak
to
how
that
changes.
D
D
That's
correct:
it
would
be
a
little
bit
different,
though
in
the
example
that
you
provided,
because
there's
a
different
statute
of
limitations
that
applies
to
minors.
So
if
you're,
if
you're
sex
trafficked,
while
you're
under
the
age
of
18,
there's
a
completely
different
statute
with
there's,
actually
two
different
types
of
statute
of
limitations.
That
would
apply
in
that
scenario,
and
I
believe
you
know,
for
example,
if
in
the
scenario
you
mentioned,
there
would
be
like
36-year
statute
limitations
because
they
were
sex
trafficked
while
they
were
under
the
age
of
18..
D
So
this
amendment
really
focuses
on
a
victim
who
is
sex
trafficked
when,
when
they're
not
a
minor,
when
they're,
18
and
older,
because
there's
a
different
statute,
that's
going
to
apply
for
the
the
under
18.
C
C
So
you
know
we
wanted
something
that
if
someone
is
over
18
that
they
would
have
additional
time,
and-
and
so
you
know
that
that
was
that
was
the
the
reason
for
the
six
years
to
give
those
people
that
were
not
minors
additional
time
because,
as
as
we've
stated,
whether
you're
a
minor
or
you
know
you're,
18
or
19
or
even
in
your
20s,
this
happens
to
you.
It
can
take
a
long
time
to
come
to
terms
with
it
and
and
have
the
courage
to
want
to
come
forward
and
go
after
your
abuser.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
and
it
looks
like
those
are
all
the
questions.
So
thank
you,
everybody
for
answering
them
and
for
your
presentation
we
will
move
to
testimony
in
support
of
ab113.
F
F
G
F
A
F
A
All
right,
thank
you.
So
much
do
the
sponsors
or
presenters
have
any
closing
remarks
on
ab113.
C
I'll
ask
miss
bolio
if
you
wanted
to
say
anything
or
mr
schwartz.
First.
D
C
Thank
you,
melissa
hardy
for
the
record,
so,
in
closing,
I
think
ab
113
is
a
bill
like
I
said
that
will
be
a
huge
step
forward
in
helping
give
victims
of
human
trafficking
the
opportunity
to
seek
justice.
C
This
bill
will
give
victims
the
time
they
need
for
healing
to
feel
safe
and
empowered
to
finally
confront
their
abusers
and
to
move
forward
with
their
lives.
This
is
justice.
This
is
riding
a
wrong,
and
these
young
men
and
women
deserve
the
opportunity
to
stand
up,
seek
that
justice
and
save
others
from
a
similar
fate.
A
A
H
Good
afternoon,
members
of
the
senate,
judiciary
and
and
chair
scheibel,
thank
you
so
much
for
the
opportunity
to
present
a
b
313.
My
name
is
alexis
hansen.
I
represent
assembly
district
32
and
I
was
asked
by
a
constituent
to
bring
this
bill
forward.
I'm
going
to
go
over
just
a
few
opening
remarks
and
then,
if
it
would
be
okay
with
the
chair,
I
would
like
to
have
my
co-presenters
take
it
from
there.
H
H
I
do
not
live
in
an
hoa,
but
I
also
know
what
good
business
looks
like
and
this
bill
and
what
it
attempts
to
do,
I
think,
is
a
win-win
for
the
hoa
communities
and
for
the
unit
owners
section
one
through
four
of
the
bill
deals
with
and
and
mr
gordon
will
we'll
go
through
that
step
by
step,
but
just
an
overall
view.
One
sections
one
through
four:
go
through
the
opt-in
electronic
voting
for
unit
owners
and
sections.
Seven
through
nine,
go
through
some
some
bookkeeping
issues
that
would
like
to
be
streamlined.
I
Good
afternoon
and
thank
you
chair
schaible
and
assemblywoman
hanson,
my
name
is
lori
olson
and
I
have
been
in
community
association
management
in
the
state
of
nevada
since
1999
and
have
been
a
supervising
community
manager.
Since
2006.,
I
want
to
thank
assemblywoman
hanson
for
graciously
agreeing
to
sponsor
ab
313
with
nearly
3
000
homeowners
associations
in
the
state
of
nevada
alone.
It
is
critical.
We
support
their
efforts
to
maximize
their
services
to
their
members,
while
keeping
their
manageable
costs
to
a
minimum.
We
are
grateful
for
assemblywoman,
hanson's,
understanding
and
support.
I
I
I
Nevada
currently
requires
two
envelopes
and
a
paper
ballot
re-returned
to
a
designated
address
for
their
board
member
elections,
which
is
an
antiquated,
very
time,
consuming
and
extremely
costly
process.
Nevada
is
one
of
only
a
few
states
which
does
not
allow
for
board
member
elections
to
be
conducted
electronically.
I
The
cost
to
colin
ranch
to
mail,
the
entire
annual
meeting
and
election
packet,
which
is
over
70
pages
in
order
to
comply
with
nrs
116,
exceeds
11
000
annually
less
than
20
of
the
2400
ballots.
We
mail
are
returned
less
than
20.
That
means
your
community
is
really
not
voting.
Only
a
few
people
who
are
smart
enough
to
return
their
ballots
are
voting.
I
Larger
hoas
such
as
colin
ranch,
have
the
need
to
utilize
the
services
of
a
mailing
house
to
provide
the
envelopes
copy,
collate,
stuff
and
mail.
The
annual
meeting
packets,
it
is
even
more
costly
to
manually
stop
the
two
envelopes
in
the
secret
ballot
into
the
mailing
envelope.
Most
management
companies
require
the
hoas
they
manage
to
utilize.
The
mailing
house,
regardless
of
its
size
since
reproducing
the
annual
packets,
puts
a
strain
on
office
machines,
copying
supplies
and
support
staff.
The
2020
board
member
election
cost
colin
ranch
over
13
thousand
dollars.
I
I
The
current
board
member
election
requirements
for
nrs
116
in
the
associated
cost
put
an
even
bigger
burden
on
smaller
hoas
they're,
either
paying
their
management
companies
or
a
mailing
house
to
provide
the
envelopes
the
copying
the
stuffing
it
goes
on
and
on
and,
as
we
know,
the
postage
rates
continue
to
increase
management
companies
are
not
in
the
business
to
lose
money.
Understandably,
their
charges
to
the
hoas
will
exceed
their
actual
costs.
The
hoas
are
charged
on
an
individual
basis
for
every
piece
of
paper
envelope,
copy
and
postage
cost,
etc,
etc.
I
Unfortunately,
nevada
hoas
have
experienced
profound
fraud
associated
with
the
two
envelope
and
paper
ballot
system.
Protecting
and
maintaining
the
chain
of
custody,
particularly
for
the
returned
ballots,
is
critical.
All
too
frequently
return
ballots
are
misplaced,
lost
and
some
have
even
been
accidentally
destroyed.
I
There
are
a
few
national
companies
who,
for
years,
have
been
conducting
confidential,
secure
and
affordable
online
elections
for
hoas.
The
process
and
protocols
have
all
been
established
and
have
proven
to
be
safe
and
reliable.
I'm
confident
that
offering
the
electronic
voting
option
will
save
colin
ranch
thousands
of
dollars
each
year.
We
have
the
need
to
produce
a
secret
ballot.
I
We
will
still
have
the
need
to
mail
the
annual
packet,
but
it
will
not
include
a
secret
ballot
or
the
two
envelopes
if
the
owner
has
opted
in
writing
to
vote
electronically,
we
understand
that
and
that
everyone
will
opt
to
vote
electronically
owners
who
request
a
paper
ballot
will
be
provided
one
along
with
the
two
envelopes
as
a
result
of
offering
the
electronic
voting
option.
Printing
copy
totally
safing
and
mailing
costs
are
expected
to
decrease
exponentially.
I
H
And
chair,
if
it
would
thank
you,
miss
olsen,
chair
scheible,
if
it
would
be
okay,
I'd
like
to
turn
the
time
over
to
mr
garrett
gordon
to
go
through
the
bill
and
then,
if
we
could
just
follow
through.
If
that
be
the
chair's
desire
to
mr
clarkson
to
follow
up.
If
there's
any
questions,
all
of
them
are
open
to
questions,
and
mr
clarkson
could
maybe
address
the
amendment.
If
there's
additional
questions.
J
Well,
thank
you,
son
of
the
woman
hanson,
and
thank
you
for
sponsoring
the
bill,
senator
scheibel
and
members
of
the
senate
judiciary
committee
for
the
record.
My
name
is
garrett,
gordon,
with
the
law
firm
of
louis
roca,
today
representing
the
community
association
institute
and
southern
highlands,
homeowners
association,
I'm
going
to
walk
through
briefly
and
certainly
open
for
any
questions.
The
the
bill
and
specifically
the
proposed
amendment.
J
I'm
looking
at
mock-up
proposed
amendment
three
three
three
two
to
assembly
bill
number
three,
one:
three,
first
reprint.
I
believe
that
document
is
in
fact
on
nellis.
Let
me
first
note
the
purpose
of
the
bill.
Really
it's
twofold
one:
to
make
it
easier
to
vote,
I
think
the
more
options
you
give
homeowners
rather
than
just
paper
ballot,
but
electronic
option
will
result
in
more
people
voting.
J
The
second
goal
here
is
at
the
end
of
the
bill,
there's
a
few
kind
of
cleanup
items
that
I'll
walk
through
just
to
kind
of
modernize,
some
hoa
processes
that
haven't
been
updated
in
a
while.
I
should
also
note
that
20
states
have
already
codified
electronic
voting
and
hoas
and
in
2021,
seven
states
currently
have
electronic
voting
and
hoa's
pending,
including
nevada
and
virginia,
in
fact,
just
passed
their
bill
earlier
this
year.
J
So
referring
to
the
mock-up
section
one
specifically
one
other
point
of
the
point
of
clarification
is
there's
a
lot
of
red
in
this
amendment
and
a
lot
of
red
lines
and
one
of
the
biggest
reasons.
Why
is
on
the
assembly
side?
We
included
the
right
to
vote
through
a
voting
machine.
J
Some
of
the
larger
associations
thought
that
might
be
pretty
efficient
somewhat
similar
to
our
general
elections.
You
go
into
the
hoa
there's
a
machine,
you
vote,
but
we
got
some
pushback
from
the
nevada
division
of
the
real
estate
division,
who
asked
us
to
remove
that
from
the
bill
prior
to
this
hearing,
so
that
voting
machine
language
you
can
see
was
littered
throughout
this
bill
has
in
fact
been
removed
for
the
real
estate
division.
J
So
with
that
all
said
section
one
you
can
see
allows
for
electronic
voting
allows
for
electronic
voting
for
hoas
either
for
the
election
of
a
board.
Member
or
removal
of
a
board
member,
then
the
same
provisions
as
far
as
ballots
apply,
where
they
must
be
open
and
counted
by
secret
ballots,
including
by
the
ones
by
electronic
means,
must
be
reviewed,
announced
and
entered
into
the
record
at
the
association
section.
J
Two
deals
with
what
happens
when
you're
removing
a
board
member,
so
this
was
not
part
of
our
original
bill,
but
assemblywoman
taurus.
Vice
chair
of
government
affairs
assembly
government
affairs
asked
us
to.
While
you
have
this
bill,
this
section
opened
in
the
bill.
Why
don't
you
go
ahead
and
deal
with
adding
some
additional
due
process
rights
if
there
is
an
election
for
removal
of
a
board?
J
Member,
so
section
two
deals
with
that
that
now
a
board
member
who
is
going
to
be
removed,
put
on
a
ballot
for
removal
does
have
a
right
to
request
a
hearing,
a
hearing
before
the
board
to
make
their
case
for
why
or
why
not,
they
shouldn't
be
removed.
So
that's
section
two
section
three
deals
with,
and
this
was
important
on
the
assembly
side,
we
worked
through
numerous
different
versions
about
kind
of
opting
in
and
opting
out
paper
ballot
versus
electronic
ballot.
J
So
as
it
sits
today,
every
home
owner
will
get
a
paper
ballot
if
the
homeowner
provides
their
email
address
to
the
association
asking
to
be
a
correspondent
with
over
email.
That
homeowner
will
get
an
electronic
ballot.
However,
just
to
be
sure,
prior
to
the
election,
that
that
homeowner
does
in
fact
want
to
receive
an
electronic
ballot,
they
have
a
right
to
opt
out
as
well,
so
they
give
their
email
to
the
association
they're
going
to
get
electronic
ballot
before
the
election.
J
They
can
say
you
know
what
I'm
going
to
opt
out
electronic
ballots
and
ask
for
paper
if
you've
never
provided
or
if
a
homeowner
has
never
provided
an
email
address
to
the
association,
then
they
in
fact
will
get
a
paper
ballot.
So
everyone
starts
with
a
paper
ballot
and
you
really
have
to
opt
in
in
order
to
get
an
electronic
ballot
and
that's
if
and
only
if
the
board
has
determined
that
electronic
ballots
are
appropriate
for
this
particular
hoa.
J
The
bottom
of
section
3
deals
with
how
these
electronic
voting
is
conducted.
It
was
important
to
the
assembly
that
a
third
party
was
in
fact
hired
and
used
in
relation
to
doing
electronic
voting,
and
then
we
included-
and
this
language
was
pulled
from
some
other
bills
around
the
country-
conflicts
of
interest.
So
whoever
you
hire
that
third
party
has
to
legitimately
be
a
third
party
vendor
to
handle
that
secret
electronic
election.
Of
course,
you
can't
have
anyone
related
to
the
candidates
to
the
board
members
to
the
manager.
J
The
voting
vendor
has
to
be
completely
autonomous
and
third
party,
as
I
head
to
section
four
again,
just
some
additional
clarifications
regarding
the
secret
ballots,
the
electronic
ballot
process
section
seven
now
we're
leaving
the
electronic
ballot
provisions
and
going
the
two
kind
of
additional
topics
in
the
bill.
This
section
seven
deals
with
being
able
to
make
automatic
payments.
So
obviously,
probably
all
of
you
myself,
we
have
ongoing
automatic
payments,
for
you
know
cell
phone
bill
or
power
bill.
J
This
allows
those
to
happen
for
hoas,
so
hoas
would
be
allowed
now
than
just
make
automatic
payments
for
insurance
policies
really
reoccurring
payments
that
could
just
happen
automatically.
Also
for
telecommunications
services,
telephone
cable,
satellite
internet,
again
just
automatic
payments
also
anything
else
that
would
be
built
on
a
monthly
basis.
That's
been
approved
by
the
board
for
automatic
payments
and,
finally,
the
ombudsman
has
to
include
the
payments
annual
payments
to
the
ombudsman's
office
for
efficiency
and
modernization.
So
that's
the
automatic
payment
section
and
then
finally
going
to
page
11.
J
there.
There
is
some
ambiguity
in
the
statute
of
what
exactly
happens
when
one
management
company,
either
quits
or
is
terminated
and
another
management
company
comes
in
obviously
having
all
the
books
and
records
of
the
association
for
a
management
company
is
extremely
critical
to
be
efficient
and
to
provide
good
service
to
the
homeowners,
there's
some
language
and
existing
statute.
That
says
everything
has
to
be
turned
over
in
30
days,
but
it
does
provide
a
gap
and
there's
been
again
in
the
industry.
J
Some
some
confusion
of
what
that
means,
so
this
provision
says:
let's
give
some
authority
to
the
commission
in
order
to
hold
workshops,
bring
in
industry
professionals,
bring
in
homeowners
and
just
codify
this
in
regulation
of
what
the
process
would
be
when
you
are
changing
a
management
company.
So
with
that,
madam
chair,
I
have
to
answer
any
questions
really
appreciate
the
time
on
the
bill
today.
Adam
clarkson
and
an
hoa
attorney
for
years
is
also
on
the
on
the
call
in
the
meeting
here
and
can
answer
any
questions.
So
thanks
again,.
A
Sorry,
mr
clarkson,
did
you
want
to
make
any
comments
before
we
go
to
questions.
F
No
thank
you.
I
think
garrett
did
a
good
job,
laying
that
out.
F
F
F
K
Thank
you,
marilyn
l
y
brainerd
b
is
in
boy
r,
a
I
n,
a
r
d.
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
opportunity,
senator
scheidel
to
just
heartily
endorse
the
recommendations
in
this
bill.
It's
long
time
coming,
I
served
for
six
years
on
the
commission
for
common
interest
communities
and
think
it
would
be
wonderful
if
they
can
come
up
with
the
to
help
improve
the
management
company
changes.
K
Sometimes
they
are
very
traumatic
because
people
don't
follow
through
and
and
provide
the
information
and
it's
a
terrible
impact
on
the
community
association
because
they
are
kind
of
sitting
you
know
suspended
in
action
waiting
for
the
management
agreements
to
be
completed
and
for
all
of
the
records
to
be
transmitted.
Also.
I
think
that
miss
olsen's
comments
regarding
the
low
number
of
voting
actual
ballots
that
are
returned.
K
I
have
helped
count
ballots
in
the
last
four
or
five
elections
here
in
wingfield
springs
community
association,
and
I
can
attest
that
it's
really
appalling
when
you
have
a
very
large
number
of
actual
owners
in
in
an
association,
and
they
do
not
return
the
ballots,
and
I
think
that
the
electronic
system
is
one
of
the
benefits.
If
we
can
say,
there's
a
benefit
coming
from
our
pandemic
is
that
many
states
have
realized.
K
You
know
what
we
can
really
do
business
a
lot
more
easily
and
more
expeditiously
by
using
electronic
means.
So
I
think
anything
we
can
do
to
er
to
let
our
associations
have
that
ability
would
be
a
big
step
forward
and
I
know
would
be
helpful
for
them
not
only
financially
but
actually
having
a
greater
participation
by
our
owners
any
rate.
K
I
certainly
heartily
endorse
everything
that
has
has
been
said
in
the
positive
side
and
hope
that
this
bill
will
see
the
sunshine
at
the
end
of
the
session
and
will
be
able
to
start
using
these
wonderful
new.
You
know
provisions
in
this
bill
and
thank
you
assemblywoman
hanson,
for
representing
it
and
for
presenting
it.
Thank
you.
F
A
F
F
G
Afternoon,
chair
tribal
in
committee,
my
name
is
mike
kozar
kosor.
G
I
have
served
multiple
terms
as
a
hoa
board
to
include
the
transition
of
a
manager.
I
call
in
opposition
to
ab313
primarily
due
to
section
eight,
to
be
clear.
I
am
in
support
of
the
bill,
except
for
section
8.
under
section
8.
I
argue
that
if
as
proposed
and
I
am
in
support,
nrs
and
the
commission
is
going
to
establish
regulations
related
to
the
transfer
of
books
and
records
and
other
papers
of
an
association
to
a
succeeding
community
manager.
The
existing
management
agreement
should
not
be
allowed
to
subvert
or
override
that
criteria.
G
As
I
read
the
proposal,
however,
that
is
exactly
what
would
occur
as
proposed.
The
criteria
for
the
transfer
of
books
and
records
would
defer
to
the
management
agreement.
I
ask
that
the
phrase
in
that
section
any
exception,
as
otherwise
provided
in
the
management
agreement
be
deleted.
Then
I
would
be
in
full
support
of
this
amendment.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
F
A
F
G
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair,
my
name
is
travis
folger
for
the
record.
I'm
an
ombudsman
from
the
nevada,
real
estate
division
becoming
interest
communities
in
condominium
hotels.
I
want
the
first
thing
to
sponsor
and
see
I
and
all
the
folks
for
working
with
our
office
to
addressing
some
of
the
concerns
we
had
here
in
our
office.
Moffs
will
continue
to
be
available
to
work
on
this
bill
or
provide
input
if
changes
are
required
or
proposed.
Thank
you.
F
A
All
right,
it
looks
like
senator
hansen,
has
a
comment
or
question.
Please
go
ahead.
E
I
just
want
the
record
to
reflect
madam
chair
that
the
first
advice
I
gave
to
assemblywoman
hanson
was
to
stay
the
hell
away
from
hoa
bills,
and
so
you
can
see
for
those
who
are
wondering
out
there
who
runs
the
show.
Well,
now
you
kind
of
get
the
drift
here
so
just
want
to
get
that
on
the
record.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
A
Well,
we
can
all
sleep
a
little
easier.
Knowing
that's
the
case
then,
and
with
that
I
will
ask
if
you
have
any
closing
comments
on
ab313.
H
Thank
you,
chair
scheible,
and
thank
you
committee
for
the
opportunity.
If
it's
okay,
if
we
could
see,
if
maybe
any,
if
there
were
any
closing
comments
from
my
co-presenters,
who
I'm
very
grateful
for.
A
J
I
couldn't
see
up
here
or
tonight.
I
could
not
see
you,
madam
chair,
but
I
can
now
so
appreciate,
closing
remarks
again:
department,
the
real
estate
division
and
a
number
of
cultures
on
assembly
side
you
get
where
we
are
really
appreciate.
The
hearing,
the
the
comment
with
regards
to
the
opposition
and
the
amendment
I
looked
at,
I
think
we're
actually
neutral
on
it,
but
I'll
work
with
the
sponsor
and
with
mr
cosor
and
make
or
if
we
can
incorporate
that
we
will.
We
will
do
so.
So
thank
you.
F
Again,
this
is
adam
clarkson
we'd,
just
like
to
thank
again
assemblyman
hassan
for
helping
and
carrying
this
bill.
I
really
appreciate
the
community
association
really
appreciate
that
we
appreciate
your
time
here
today
committee.
We
appreciate
working
with
the
real
estate
division,
so
we
really
appreciate
everything
everyone's
done
and
everyone's
time
today.
Thank
you
so.
H
H
Mr
kozar's
concerns
over
some
of
that
wording.
In
the
amendment
that
I
just
became
aware
of
today
we
will
we
will
further
engage,
and
I
think
we've
got
an
optimum
bill
here,
where
we
are
giving
a
voice
and
a
protection
in
the
vote
to
homeowners
in
an
association,
we
are
streamlining
and
saving
money,
helping
those
companies
save
money
that
manage
those
associations.