►
From YouTube: 2/11/2021 - Assembly Ways and Means and Senate Finance, Subcommittees on K-12/Higher Education/CIP
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
C
D
C
A
And
I
am
here
good
morning,
everyone
thank
you
all
for
being
here
so
with
that,
I
believe
we
can
go
ahead
and
begin.
Our
first
budget
this
morning
is
1082,
treasurer
bond
interest
and
redemption
fund,
I'm
not
sure
who
we
have,
it
might
be
miss
hagan
or
whoever
we
have
in
the
queue
if
we
could
go
ahead
and
bring
them
up.
Please.
F
Know
you
wouldn't
you
know
I
wouldn't
miss
the
opportunity
to
say
good
morning
to
everyone,
but
I
am
in
fact
joined
by
chief
deputy
tear
hagan.
F
Good
morning,
chair
and
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
zach
conan.
I
serve
as
your
nevada
state
treasurer
thanks
for
allowing
us
the
opportunity
to
present
bond
account.
1082
budget
account
1082
for
the
consolidated
bond
interest
and
redemption
fund,
the
bond
fund
or
perf
for
the
2021-23
biennium
as
an
overview.
The
state
treasurer's
office
is
responsible
for
issuing
debt
obligations
on
behalf
of
and
in
the
name
of
the
state.
F
With
certain
exceptions,
the
bond
fund
was
established
pursuant
to
nrs
349
spot
80
through
spot
140
to
receipt,
the
collection
of
17
property
tax
revenue
dedicated
to
the
payment
of
the
principal
and
interest
on
the
state's
general
obligation,
or
go
bonds
and
to
reserve
money
for
future
geo
bond
debt
service
payments.
The
governor's
recommended
budget
for
this
fund
includes
revenues
from
property
taxes,
appropriations
from
other
budget
accounts
per
authorizing
statutes
and
any
interest
earnings
on
the
fund.
F
The
expenditures
include
the
principal
and
interest
payments
on
debt
and
costs
associated
with
issuances,
including
professional
services
like
bond
council,
disclosure,
council,
municipal
advisors
and
other
required
services
to
facilitate
issuance,
such
as
paying
agents,
trustees,
arbitrage
calculations,
rating
agency,
work,
etc.
We're
not
requesting
any
new
programs
for
the
bond
fund
and
the
governor's
budget.
This
concludes
my
presentation
and
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions.
This
committee
may
have.
B
I
have
a
question
senator
dancer.
I
can't
hit
my
chat.
B
So
in
looking
at
the
state's
bonding
capacity,
we
had
some
previews
a
little
while
ago.
I
guess
like
a
week
or
two
ago,
and
I
think
the
last
bond
that
we
issued
was
1.86
and
in
looking
at
the
reserves
that
we
have.
It
looks
like
we're
supposed
to
keep
about
50,
but
we're
anticipated
to
have
between
98.9
and
100
and
roughly
17
over
the
biennium.
F
Thank
you
senator
treasurer
conan
for
the
record,
so
our
primary
purpose
of
the
bond
interest
and
redemption
fund
is
twofold,
one
to
make
sure
that
we
have
always
the
ability
to
pay
the
debts
that
we've
obligated
the
state
to,
and
that's
sort
of
the
highest
and
best
number
two
is
to
use
that
fund
most
appropriately
in
order
to
keep
our
credit
rating
high,
which
keeps
our
interest
cost
low
and,
as
you
mentioned,
we've
got
an
exceptionally
good
credit
rating
and
part
of
the
reason
for
that
is
because
of
the
strength
of
the
birth.
F
However,
still
very
conservative
because
we
want
to
make
sure
we
always
have
the
money
to
pay
the
debts,
so
we've
been
able
to
actually
increase
our
affordability,
which
is
the
amount
of
debt
that
we're
able
to
issue
because
the
amount
of
debt
we're
able
to
issue
able
to
service.
Excuse
me
by
about
100
million
dollars
compared
to
the
last
biennium,
that's
as
far
as
we're
comfortable
going
as
far
as
I'm
comfortable
going
given
the
current
market
situation.
F
B
Okay,
it
just
seems,
like
the
assumptions,
are
extremely
conservative
and
again
money
is
so
inexpensive
right
now,
if
there's
anything
that
we
think
we
needed
to
get
built,
that
we
should
be
taking
the
opportunity
to
to
do
that
because
it
does,
I
mean
interest
rates
may
go
up,
but
it's
you're
assumptions
going
from
six
percent
to
four
percent
when
four
percent's
actually
double
what
the
our
last
bond
was.
So
I
appreciate
your
answer.
Thank
you.
F
Those
are
hard,
but
the
penalty
for
overextending
ourselves
from
a
bonding
affordability
perspective
could
be
devastating
and
we've
seen
what
happens
to
states
who
aren't
able
to
pay
their
debt
and
what
it
does
to
their
long-term
ability
to
generate
capital.
I
I
think
we're
we've
got
a
pretty
good
line
there,
but
happy
to
walk
you
through
kind
of
the
assumptions
we've
made
and
why
we
made
them.
The
other
thing
is
it's
not
just
the
interest
rate.
We
can
borrow
it
at
it's.
F
What's
going
to
pay
it
back
right,
so
we
need
to
make
sure
the
property
taxes
remain
constant.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
other
revenue
streams
exist
and
without
full
clarity
on
what's
going
to
happen
in
the
future.
Again,
we
prefer
to
be
a
little
bit
more
conservative
but
happy.
B
No
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
information
and
I
think
we
all
agree
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
enough
revenue
and
property
tax
is
really
pretty
flat
because
even
in
downturns,
property
tax
gets
paid
when
homes
are
foreclosed
upon
and
so
forth.
So
I
know
it's
one,
a
very
stable
source,
so
I
agree
with
you
that
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
revenues
to
be
able
to
cover
in
debt
that
we
have,
and
we
also,
I
think,
it's
just
important
to
recognize
that
we.
G
B
Seen
money
this
is
inexpensive,
maybe
ever
I'm
not
I'm
not
really
sure,
and
so
there
are
opportunities
that
are
before
us,
and
I
do
appreciate
that
we,
it
sounds
like
our
debt.
Affordability
has
gone
up
about
100
billion
dollars
from
last
biennium
because
because
of
the
adjustment
of
the
assumptions,
so
thank
you
for
that.
A
C
Thank
you,
ma'am,
chair
treasure.
I
know
when
you're
breaking
apart,
the
17
cent
levy
into
the
go
portion
and
the
open
space
portion,
that's
sort
of
a
balancing
act
and
the
the
portion
that's
being
dedicated
to
open
space
this
year
is
shrinking.
I'm
down
to,
I
think
point:
eight
two
cents
is
there:
can
you
just
talk
a
little
bit
how
you
balance
that
out?
Are
you
trying?
C
Is
it
sort
of
back
door
into
the
open
space
portion
after
you
decide
how
much
go
capacity
you
want
or
how
do
you
get
there.
F
Treasurer
conan
for
the
record
I'll
start
here
and
if
chief
deputy
tara
hagan
wants
to
add
anything
to
it.
I'd
ask
for
the
chair's
permission
on
that
front.
So,
while
we
have
two
cents
that
is
allocated
potentially
to
open
space
projects,
it's
not
carved
out
specifically
right.
A
Of
course,
thank
you
senator
I
I
was
going
to
ask
along
the
same
lines
because
I
was
under
the
impression
the
q1
bonding
that
we
had
and
then,
when
we
worked
on
ab-84
last
session,
that
that
really
was
the
intent
for
that
to
be
there
for
those
projects.
So
could
you
expand
upon
that?
A
little
bit
more.
F
B
Good
morning
committee,
thank
you,
treasurer
tara,
hagan,
chief
deputy
for
the
record.
As
the
treasurer
indicated,
it
really
is
built
on
the
governor's
budget.
So
we
look
at
obviously
to
your
point,
the
the
q1
prior
q1
and
the
debt
that
is
existing
on
that
that
we
need
to
pay
in
addition
to
now
the
ab-84.
B
A
Okay,
I
think
I'm
probably
going
to
have
more
questions
on
this
at
another
time,
but
we
have
an
awful
lot
to
get
through
today,
so
I
won't
go
too
far
into
the
needs
on
this
one,
but
I
do
have
some
concerns
about
how
that
two
cents
is
set
aside
for
outdoor,
so
we
we
can
have
further
conversations
about
that.
Okay,
certainly
happy
too.
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
it
so
other
questions
from
other
committee
members
at
this
time.
A
I
think
we're
good
there.
I
believe
we
can
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
the
next
budget.
Then,
if
there's
no
other
additional
questions,
madam.
E
Chair
woman,
yes,
I
just
had
a
quick
question.
I
know
that
we're
working
to
reconcile
some
discrepancies
between
gov's
wrecked
with
projected
ad
valorem
and
that
the
treasurer's
debt
capacity
affordability
report
and
and
what
the
what
each
has
in
there.
But
I
was
wondering
if
we
could
get
an
idea
for
the
record
of
I
guess,
which
way
we're
leaning
should
we
as
a
subcommittee,
be
prepared
to
see
us
lean
more
towards
the
tax
revenue
projections
in
the
debt,
treasurer's
debt
capacity,
ability,
reform
report
or
wreck.
F
Treasurer
conan
for
the
record
assemblywoman,
I'm
not
sure
how
to
answer
that
I'll
pass
it
over
to
chief
deputy
tara
hagan
and
if
not,
we
might
have
to
follow
up
with
you
offline.
B
Yeah,
thank
you
treasurer.
It
was
really
just
a
timing
issue
in
terms
of
the
property
tax
revenue,
because
obviously
the
the
1082
budget
would
needed
to
be
submitted
to
the
governor's
finance
office
september
1,
but
the
tax
committee
had
not
yet
met
so
they
met
in
mid
to
late
december.
I
believe,
and
so
therefore
we
were
able
to
shore
up
the
affordability
and
have
the
property
tax
consistent
with
the
tax
committee
for
the
affordability.
E
A
D
F
D
Other
matters
of
the
state
first
we'll
be
going
over
in
brief,
the
vision,
mission
and
philosophy
of
the
public
works
division.
Our
organizational
chart,
the
two
budgets
that
we're
talking
about
is
budget
count,
1562
and
1349.
D
D
Reductions
that
happened
earlier
in
the
calendar
year
and
we'll
go
through
the
projects
that
are
actually
in
the
cip.
The
state
public
works
division.
I
want
to
cut
right
here
to
how
we
conduct
ourselves
and
and
how
that's
best
stated.
It's
best
stated
by
our
philosophy.
We
work
as
a
team
to
build
consensus.
D
We
take
pride
in
our
work
and
we
serve
with
humility.
Going
to
our
org
chart
you'll
see
124
authorized
positions
here.
This
is
in
support
of
the
governor's
recommendation.
There's
an
e600
item,
efficiency
measure
that
we'll
be
discussing
a
little
later,
but
that's
included
within
this
account
here
on
this
organization.
Chart.
D
This
slide
is
an
image
of
the
newly
opened
university
of
nevada
reno,
william
and
dean
pennington
engineering
building
this
project
was
completed
in
august
2020.
The
building
was
open
to
students
all
semester
of
that
year.
This
project
is
fast
becoming
the
flagship
of
the
engineering
program
at
unr.
D
The
building
was
designed
to
complement
its
surroundings,
as
you
can
see,
red
brick
and
steel
capture.
The
architectural
vernacular
of
the
campus
public
works
division
is
proud
to
add
this
structure
to
our
list
of
projects
that
not
only
meet
the
programmatic
needs
of
the
department
but
are
consistent
with
our
vision.
The
states
occupy
exemplary
facilities
now
to
budget
account
15
62.
D
quickly.
We
have
four
enhancement
units
here.
They
are:
the
elimination
of
a
project
manager
and
a
and.
C
D
For
the
computer
hardware,
replacements
and
re-licensing
of
software,
largely
software,
that's
for
project
management,
duties,
which
also
includes
timekeeping,
our
timecard
system,
autocad
and
very
in
other
programs,
including
mechanical
design
programs.
Finally,
we
have
safety
equipment
pretty
self-explanatory,
but
would
take
any
questions
on.
A
That
all
right,
mr
patrick,
now
to
mr
patrick,
miss
mr
patrick,
I
think
we're
gonna
do
these
one
by
one
just
to
make
it
easier
to
try
to
be
as
systematic
as
possible,
and
we
know
how
passionate
you
are
about
public
works
and
these
buildings.
So,
but
we
want
to
be
able
to
get
as
much
information
from
you
as
we
can.
We've
got
a
lot
on
our
plates
this
morning,
so
I
guess
what
my
question
would
be
on
this
project
manager
and
building
constructor
inspector.
A
You
know
we
had
heard
from
you
in
pre-session
hearings
that
there
was
a
need
for
some
folks,
but
yet
here
we're
eliminating
a
couple.
So
could
you
just
kind
of
go
over
how
you
came
to
being
able
to
eliminate
these
two
positions
and
how
will
this
actually
affect
your
workload?
The
last
thing
we
want
to
do
is
get
behind.
D
We
did
not
anticipate
a
bond
capacity
of
over
400
million
now
that
that
has
happened.
Well,
there's
going
to
be
a
governor's
amendment
to
withdraw
that
e600
item
and
go
to
the
next
one
and.
D
Got
to
this
conclusion
that
we're
going
to
need
one
additional
project
manager,
three
additional
building
construction
inspectors,
as
well
as
remove
the
e600
efficiency
enhancement
unit,
is
here
listed
on
this
slide.
So
you
see
here
within
the
all
these
cip
books
that
you
have
before
even
electronic
format.
Every
one
of
those
project
spreadsheets
has
a
project
management
inspection
dollars,
which
is
supported
by
effort
by
the
public
works
division.
We
have
a
75
item
checklist
that
we've
determined
what
type
of
effort
is
required
on
every
project
and.
I
I
A
D
Quite
yet
completed,
and
that
would
be
the
strongest
example
of
that
is
the
marlette
lake
dam
rehabilitation
project.
So
we're
adding
that
to
the
workload
coming
up
to
this
next
biennium,
then.
Finally,
there's
projects
that
we
will
not
be
able
to
complete
within
the
biennium
and
there's
these
three
projects
listed
here
which
we'll
go
over
further
when
those
departments
come
about.
But
it's.
A
D
Washoe,
county
training,
center
hobart
reservoir
dam
for
the
apartment
administration
and
the
cemetery
expansion
for
the
department
of
veterans
services.
Then
we
get
additional
work.
Besides
the
cip,
we
have
what
we
call
building
official
projects,
meaning
when
an
agency
has
money
and
needs
to
go,
get
a
building
permit.
We
need
to
prevent
that
project,
which
means
plan
check
and
inspect
it.
D
D
D
D
D
On
putting
no
projects
on
hold
planning
on
marching
through
these
projects,
it
is
true.
However,
we
have
11
vacancies
in
the
project
management
area
and
six
vacancies
in
the
inspector
area
we've
been
amber
by
the
the
whole
there's
this
covid
thing
going
on
and
essential
services
only
those
necessary
to
complete
the
work.
We've
also,
as
you're
aware,
have
reduced
the
current
cip
work.
That's
on
our
books
by
100
million
dollars
in
general
fund
and
some
commensurate
bond
money
and
other
funding.
D
So
with
all
that
concern,
we've
been
working
to
keep
some
positions
vacant,
so
we
would
not
over
hire
well
now
we
have
a
work
plan
for
to
fill
those
11
pm
positions
and
those
six
inspector
positions
and
are
prepared
to
build
these
positions
here.
This
additional
project
manager,
as
well
as
inspectors
so.
A
A
Okay,
that's
what
I
needed
to
know
all
right.
So,
okay,
thank
you,
appreciate
that
so
go
ahead
and
go
ahead
and
proceed
to
the
to
the
next
item.
Please
thank.
D
You,
madam
chairman
ward,
patrick
for
the
record
I'll,
be
now
having
ron
cothrin.
My
deputy.
C
C
C
C
C
C
A
Yes,
thank
you
very
much,
mr
patrick.
We
appreciate
that.
So
I
guess
one
of
the
major
issues
is
the
state-owned
rent
changes
that
are
being
proposed.
So
if
you
could
walk
us
through
the
thought
process
behind
that,
how
do
the
reserves
play
into
the
state-owned
rent
and
then
I
believe
there
was
a
small
issue
with
the
new
dmv
building.
So
if
you
could
just
give
us
a
high
level
on
the
changes
in
the
state-owned
rent,
please.
D
I
appreciate
that
and
matthew
tuma
at
asd
may
be
available
also
on
this,
but
I
would
initiate
that
conversation.
Our
current
rent
rates
are
approximately
a
dollar
nine
per
month
per
square
foot,
and
we
see
those
going
down
due.
I
D
B
D
As
moving
as
you
stated,
the
reserve
into
into
into
the
next
biennium,
so
we.
D
Our
reserve
going
in
the
next
biennium
and
that
helps
save
rent
for
the
various
entities.
I
would
point
out
that
kind
of
what
it
what
has
happened
in
the
treasurer's
presentation,
the
little
bit
issue
of
timing,
where
the
dmv
in
south
reno
another
exemplary
facility
provided
just
to
to
the
citizens
in
reno
that
didn't
get
on
the
get
on
the
books
to
be
included
within
the
rent
rate
as
right
now,
and
so
that's
an
issue
that
we're
coordinating
with
fiscal
staff.
But
so
that
is
not
incorporated
in
the
rent.
A
A
Okay-
and
thank
you,
mr
patrick,
so
wouldn't
it
typically
when
a
building
would
be
open,
wouldn't
they
start
paying
rent
then,
or
do
we
typically
wait
for
the
next
budget
cycle?
To
do
that,
I
thought
that
would
just
be
an
automatic,
the
building's
open
it's
generating
revenue.
It
should
be
paying
towards
its
own
rent.
D
Where
patrick
for
the
record,
that
is
exactly
correct,
madam
chair,
we
are
receiving
rent
on
the
full
54
111
square
feet
of
the
new
south
reno
dmv
on
diamond
double
diamond
parkway
and.
A
B
Carlton,
yes,.
C
Matthew,
tuma
administrator
for
asd
for
the
record
just
to
add
on
to
that.
The
dmv
moved
into
their
new
facility
at
in
november
of
last
calendar
year,
and
so
they
would
pay
rent
for
their
old
facility
for
the
first
four
months
of
the
fiscal
year
and
then
for
the
remainder
of
the
fiscal
year
is
when
we
would
change
when
we
would
update
the
rate
and
the
square
footage
of
what
they're
paying
for
the
new
facility.
C
It's
kind
of
a
timing
issue
on
the.
Why
on
why?
It
didn't
make
it
into
the
schedule
for
the
next
biennium
because
they
moved
in
so
late
in
the
budget.
Preparation
calendar,
it's
kind
of
compressed
in
a
normal
time
frame,
and
so
it
didn't
make
it
into
the
updated
rate
for
the
next
biennium.
C
That
being
said,
we're
working
with
the
gfo
to
update
to
make
sure
that
it
is
in
dmv's
budget
and
then
we'll
look
at
sort
of
the
full
implications
for
the
rent
rate,
as
the
legislature
decides
what
deck
units
and
what
changes
are
approved
for
1349,
to
make
sure
that
we
move
forward
with
the
appropriate
rates.
C
To
add
on
to
what
administrator
patrick
stated
earlier
is
we're
going
into
the
next
biennium
with
a
fairly
high
reserve,
so
that
allows
us
to
drop
rent
rates
by
about
10
percent
going
into
the
next
biennium
and
we're
constantly
monitoring
what
that
level
of
rent
would
be
to
make
sure
that
we
also
don't
have
rent
shock
looking
forward
into
the
future.
A
A
Maybe
we
over
did
last
time
a
little
bit,
so
there's
a
little
bit
extra
there
and
then
I
know
the
pandemic
probably
had
some
impacts
on
on
some
of
this,
but
I
just
don't
want
to
set
it
so
low
that
you
you're
gonna,
have
a
huge
catch-up
for
next
by
annie
and
we
wanna
try
to
keep
it
as
stable
as
as
possible
so
that
we
can
plan
forward.
So
thank
you
for
for
putting
that
on
the
record.
A
I
guess
the
only
other
question
I
would
have
at
this
moment
would
be
under
the
maintenance
projects
that
are
in
this
particular
budget
account,
I'm
not
going
to
ask
you
to
go
through
them
all.
They
all
look
very
reasonable
and
I'm
sure
committee
members
will
follow
up
with
you
if
they
have
any
particular
one
or
I'll
be
happy
to
open
it
up
to
them.
But
the
one
that
I
just
wanted
to
ask
a
question
on
was
the
campos
building
in
las
vegas.
A
You
have
the
secure
card,
repairs
and
upgrades
if
there's
a
security
issue,
I'm
just
curious.
Why
that's
in
the
second
year,
not
the
first
year,
it's
just
44
a
little
over
44
000
and
I'm
always
concerned
about
security
of
the
buildings.
D
A
C
C
A
Thank
you
very
much.
I
like
it
when
you
say
it's
not
a
life
safety
issue.
We
heard
that
too
many
times
six
eight
years
ago
on
some
of
these
maintenance
projects.
So
I
appreciate
that,
mr
patrick,
if
you
could
just
kind
of
give
us
a
brief
thought
behind
how
you
pray
prioritize,
these
maintenance
projects
over
the
biennium.
D
D
For
the
record,
we
went
over
this
in
the
pre-session
hearing,
so
our
board
has
approved
the
prioritization
system.
Largely
it
is
comes
from
two
sources.
One
is
the
condition
of
the
facility,
and
so
our
pm's
rate,
these
projects,
one
two
or
three
meaning
it
needs
to
be
done.
This
session
needs
to
be
done
the
following
session
or
needs
to
be
done
at
some
later
time.
D
This
is
followed
by
govern
essential
facilities
such
as
24-hour
use
facilities
as
prisons
and
psychiatric
hospitals,
and
the
like,
followed
by
followed
by
offices
of
governance,
and
so
certainly
the
sawyer
building
the
capitol
building
and
the
like
are
all
considered
part
of
governance
and
are
a
high
priority,
and
then
the
balance
of
the
buildings
follow
that.
Thank
you
for
the
question.
A
A
Hearing
none.
Thank
you.
I
believe
we
can
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
the
my
favorite
part
of
the
legislature.
Is
the
capital
improvement
projects
love
to
build
stuff.
B
D
D
So
last
last
session
we
had
some
dialogue
on
construction,
inflation
and
how
that
came
about,
and
we
took
that
to
heart
and
we
contracted
with
o'connor
construction
management,
who
are
known
in
the
state
for
providing
good
information
on
construction
inflation,
estimated,
and
so
our
annual
inflation
rate
for
construction
is
based
on
several
sources.
As
you
see
here,
the
market
wage
rates,
employment
rates,
availability
of
materials
and
labor
a
bid
results
which
you've
heard
from
public
works
throughout
the
years.
D
Recent
recent
project
cost
estimates
and
also
o'connor
considered
the
national,
regional
and
local
construction
cost
report.
D
So
the
2021
inflation
rates
you'll
see
in
the
cip
book
on
every
page,
in
that
approximately
200
page
book
is
a
5.16
percent
annual
rate
for
the
north
and
4.1
percent
of
the
south,
and
so
to
we
boiled
down
a
little
bit
about
how
they
came
to
those
numbers,
but
also
I'd
like
to
point
out
that
these
are
cumulative
numbers
for
the
next
for
the
for
the
two
years,
starting
when
the
project
managers
release
their
responsibilities
to
estimate
the
project.
All
of
our
estimates
are
based
on
june
of
2020
information.
D
That's
when
those
estimates
were
done,
and
so
this
o'connor
report
states
that
the
inflation
rates
would
be
very
low,
and
this,
of
course,
based
on
projections
during
the
during
the
pandemic,
that
they
would
be
very
low
in
the
less
than
two
percent
range.
D
But
they
they
believe
that
in
the
next
year,
which
would
be
from
this
june
coming
up
for
the
following
year,
would
would
increase
in
the
six
seven
eight
nine
percent
rate
and
taking
a
cumulative
average
you're
getting
to
these
rates
that
we're
using
in
our
cip
about
five
percent
and
four
percent
again
that
was
performed
by
o'connor
construction
management.
Corporation
we've
got
a
few
other
slides
here
which
includes
construction
contingency,
which
we've
went
over
this
in
detail
with
lcb
fiscal
and
so
we'll
just
point
out
that
we're.
A
D
Projects
then,
we
also
do
use
construct
construction
allowances
and
we
have
four
different
types.
If
there's
a
remote
project,
these
contractors
are
likely
to
be
spending
money
on
per
diem
in
these
facilities
and
so
that
these
costs
will
go
up.
Secure
facilities,
there's
always
a
check-in
checkout
time
that
needs
to
be
needs
to
be
taken
care
of
on
these
projects
and
then.
D
Phase
projects
which
you'll
see
the
welding
lab
we'll
go
over
that
a
little
bit
later
today
and
an
occupied
facility
working
around
various
client
clients
that
are
in
the
buildings
takes
a
little
extra
time,
and
so
we've
included
allowances
for
these
items.
D
So
now
I'd
like
to
introduce
some
of
the
projects
that
are
returning
to
the
cip
due
to
the
budget
reductions
that
occur
largely
in
sp1,
but
some
of
these
may
have
been
in.
A
D
Here
in
carson
city,
there
were
a
few
projects
that
were
removed
out
of
these
statewide
programs
and
we'll
be
highlighting
those
as
well
so
in
the
roofing
program
that
the
railroad
museum,
which
has
much
needed
roof
replacement
here
in
carson
city,
was
removed
based
on
the
budget
reductions,
as
well
as
a
number
of
crack
and
slurry
sale
projects
for
the
painting
program.
So.
D
D
A
And
if
before
we
get
to
statewide
programs-
mr
patrick,
I
guess
harigi
did
you
have
a
question
on
the
the
projects
list.
B
I
just
had
a
quick
question:
it's
my
first
time
on
this
subcommittee,
so
it's
more
for
it's
more
for
just
my
knowledge,
but
with
the
construction
contingency.
I
know
it's
15
for
project
below
10
million
and
10
for
those
over.
If
it
doesn't
get
used.
Does
that
money
get
reverted
back
to
the
general
fund.
D
Thank
you
for
the
question.
The
money
that
doesn't
get
used
goes
back
to
the
place
of
origin
following
statutory
spending
criteria,
the
public
works.
Division
by
law
is
required
to
spend
other
money
first.
So
if
there's
a
50
50
split
with
the
university
system,
that
money
would
be
spent.
First,
second
portion
of
the
money
could
be
general
fund.
You
know
in
the
past
or
general
obligation
bonds,
and
so,
if
it
was
bonds,
those
bonds
would
be
reallocated
if
they
were
unspent
and
general
funds
would
go
back
to
the
general
fund.
If
left
unspent.
A
Thank
you,
chair
you're,
welcome
ms
houdaki,
so,
mr
patrick,
I
think
what
I'd
like
to
follow
up
on
is
a
lot
of
these
are
going
to
be
maintenance
projects
and
we're
bonding
out
maintenance
projects,
and
I
believe
that
was
brought
up
in
the
pre-session
hearing.
So
there's
there's
just
some
concerns
about
that.
So
do
you
have
any
more
information
for
us
on
that
or
I'm
just
concerned
that
we're
bonding
out
projects
that
really
aren't
20-year
projects.
D
And
I
appreciate
that.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
ward,
patrick
for
the
record
I'll.
I
am
a
little
bit
hoping
that
the
treasures
office
is
still
online,
that's
solidly
in
their
lane.
I
would
I
would
initiate
that
conversation
with
of
of
all
these
projects
that
total
up
to
the
491
million
that
are
in
the
cip.
D
We've
identified
approximately
8
million
of
those
that
don't
meet
the
criteria
for
a
20-year
project,
and
so
so
so
there
is
that
and,
and
so
the
treasurer
office
they're,
if
they're
in
they
can
certainly
queue
it.
But.
D
It
they
they
have
the
capacity
to
issue
shorter
term
bonds
for
those
types
of
projects
and
any
other
more
detail
on
that.
I
would
need
to
defer
to
the
treasures
office
and
we
could
get
back
to
you
with
any
further
reporting.
A
A
If
not
I'll
be
sure
and
follow
up
and
I'll
make
sure
the
committee's
aware
of
what
the
discussion
is,
but
we
do
want
them
to
to
work
with
our
staff
on
that.
If
there's
eight
million
dollars
worth
that
need
to
be
done
in
a
different
way,
it's
it.
There's,
there's
a
cause
and
reaction
to
all
these
budgets,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
that
gets
worked
out.
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
patrick.
We
appreciate
it
committee
members.
Are
there
any
other
questions
on
madam
chairwoman.
E
Yes,
oh
thank
you
so
much.
I
I
did
have
a
question,
and
so
this
question
is
around
the
construction,
inflation
and
kind
of
looking
at
the
construction
inflation
projection.
So
I
know
last
session
there
was
a
robust
conversation
we
had
on
this
committee
about
the
ten
percent,
the
seven
percent
and
and
it's
lower
this
time.
But
I'm
wondering,
can
you
put
on
the
record
like
the
o'connor
construction
management
in
their
cost
inflation
study?
E
Can
you
just
tell
us
a
little
bit
more
about
how,
from
their
city
like
how
they
came
to
their
conclusions?
I'm
and
I'm
wondering
because
I'm
looking
at
the
2013,
cip,
so
kind
of
the
cip
levels.
The
last
time
we
had
a
big
recession
and
those
were
down
to
two
percent
and
in
the
you
know
the
2021.
E
D
Thank
you
for
the
question
regarding
inflation,
and
so
I
think
the
question
was
in
response
to
the
prior.
C
D
Time,
like
you
said,
we
had
a
lower
input,
strength
now
we're
in
the
four
or
five
percent
range,
but
we
are.
We
have
considered
the
level
of
detail
in
breaking
that
up
both
north
and
south,
and
so
we've
hired
this
professional,
which
I
believe
is
also
this.
This
group
is
the
basis
of
why
the
reduction
happened
in
the
last
session,
so
we
feel
pretty
confident
in
their
their
credentials.
D
So
I
would
point
out
that
you
know
we're
in
the
winter
is
when
we
do
a
lot
of
bidding,
because
that
tends
to
be
when
all
the
contractors
are
working
up
their
workflow
for
the
next
year
and
so
in
our
world.
We
would
think
there
would
be
many
bidders
on
all
projects
in
order,
because,
because
times
are
tough
everywhere
and
so
I've
approved
a
bid
the
other
day
where
there
was
only
one
bidder
and
so.
A
D
B
D
For
some
of
the
bigger
projects
that
we
did
almost
two
years
ago,
we
had
three
and
five
subcontractors
bidding
on
every
project.
So,
although
we're
you
know,
we've
stated
we've
stated
that
we
believe
this
first
year
during
the
pandemic.
There,
the
inflation
is
almost
non-existent,
but
coupled
with
the
following
year,
we
anticipate
eight
or
nine
percent
inflation
based
on
on
the
contracted
work.
D
So
our
some
of
these
projects
will
not
be
done
exactly
in
that
various
time
frame.
D
Will
be
have
some
minor
minor
delays,
so
we're
asking
for
this
inflation
rate,
basically
only
for
those
two
years
the
year
that
is
mostly
behind
us
and
this
next
year,
coming
up
where
we're
asking
for
the
second
year
of
inflation.
So
if
any
of
these
projects
go
beyond
we're,
relying
on
the
inflation
rates
that
we
put
in
these
projects
to
care
to
make
the
still
make
the
project
successful.
E
D
We're
patrick
for
the
record,
I
believe,
lcb
fiscal,
contacted
them
and
made
the
recommendation
to
reduce
the
inflation
rate
in
the
north
from
10
to
7,
and
that
was
incorporated
in
the
cip
and
so
certainly
public
works
division.
We
consulted
them,
but
we
did
not
contract
with
them.
This
year
we
contracted
with
them
and
relied
on
them,
but
still
used
other
sources
to
kind
of
wave
that
out.
E
So
last
time
you
contracted
with
them,
but
then
there
was
also
your
own
internal
analysis
and
then
this
time
it
was
completely
their
work,
their
work
product,
I'm
just
I'm
try.
I
can't
remember
all
the
details
from
last
session,
so
I'm
just
trying
to
make
sure
I'm
getting
them
right,
but
as
my
re,
so
if
I
got
that
straight
in
my
head.
A
Results:
okay,
miss
benitez
thompson,
you
good
yeah
thanks!
Thank
you.
I
believe
I
have
assembled
robert's
next.
C
To
this
committee
as
well-
and
I
apologize
for
such
a
simple
question-
I
should
probably
know
this,
but
you
list
the
table
we
had
and
you
discussed
earlier.
D
Thank
you
very
much.
I
first
clarify
state
funding
and
so
state
funding
is
is
bonds.
Basically,
so
that's
that
whole
category,
that's
how
that
has
turned
out.
So
now
we
have
the
other
funding,
so
the
other
funding
is
federal
funding.
So
there's
some
big
projects
for
the
guard
that
have
some
milk
on
funding,
as
well
as
some
of
their
maintenance
funding,
federal
and
some
of
the
federal
funding
is
from
veterans
cemetery
group.
D
A
D
The
slot
tax
that
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
so
that's
a
deferred
maintenance
area
funding
for
the
nevada
system
of
higher
education,
then
there's
smaller
amounts
of
money
that
come
from
various
other
grants.
State
parks
has
some
opportunity
for
us
to
require
money
from
a
couple
federal
grants
as
well,
and
then
wildlife
has
funding
to
support
the
dam
project
up
near
cable,
cave
lake
reservoir.
C
D
And
then
there's
even
smaller
amounts
that
are
directly
from
agencies
like
emergency
management
is
working
with
us,
so
we
can
be
proactive
on
any
indoor,
air
quality
or
mold
related
issues,
and
so
there
they
have
a
they're
pitching
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
towards
the
cip
and
we're
catching
that
to
be
proactive
in
keeping
healthy
state
buildings.
Thank
you.
C
A
Oh
no,
no
problem,
mr
robertson,
it's
a
good
refresher
for
all
of
us,
because
we
only
talk
about
these
issues.
You
know
every
couple
of
years
and
it's
nice
to
have
everyone
on
the
same
page.
So
anyone
who
has
a
question
you're
more
than
welcome
to
ask
we
want
everyone
to
be
on
the
same
page.
So
that's
absolutely
no
problem.
So
with
that,
I
think,
mr
patrick,
we
can
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
the
part
that
we
like
the
best.
D
C
C
A
I
know
thank
you.
I
think
we
do
have
some
questions.
There
were
a
couple
of
items
that
we'd
like
to
go
a
little
bit
further
into
if
we
could
go
to
sl4,
please
just
the
preparation
of
the
the
cip
and
the
funding
mechanism.
E
A
D
21
so4
program
regarding
regarding
funding
the
treasurer's
office
is
a.
A
D
A
D
Then
they'll
be
using
various
terms
for
the
various
bonds
to
pay.
B
D
Our
pms
will
be
doing
due
diligence
from
april
through
june
to
develop
the
scopes
of
these
projects,
and
that's
very
astute
of
you,
madam
chair,
that
that
is
the
key
part
of
these
projects.
It's
not
necessarily
these
small
nuts
and
bolts,
but
it's
it's
establishing
what
the
scope
is,
and
so
certainly
these
applications
that
come
through
from
the
agencies
provide
some
of
the
scope,
and
you
know
on
some
projects
very,
very
fine
detail
and
others
very
vague
and
our
professional
staff.
D
In
all
these
various
areas,
architects,
engineers
that
include
structural,
mechanical,
electrical
and
civil,
go
out
to
these
various
facilities,
and
we
have
construction
management,
individuals
that
take
care
of
ada
and
fire
and
life
safety
and
roofing
and
the
like,
and
they
go
out
and
scope
these
projects.
And
so
then
we
have
a
process
where
we
in-house
jury.
These
projects
verify
these
projects.
The
scope
makes
sense
and.
D
A
D
Last
tidbit
that
I
could
offer
without
venturing
into
the
treasures
office
lane
is
that
there's
some
possibility
that
these
would
be
taxable
bonds
as
opposed
to
non-taxable
general
obligation
bonds.
So
without
I
would
be
we'd
need
to
get
back
to
you
on
any
any
further
commentary
with
help
from
the
treasurer's
office.
A
Okay,
well,
I
think
it's
good
that
we
have
it
on
the
record.
We
typically
don't
do
planning
with
bonds.
So
I've
said
it.
It's
on
the
record.
We'll
do
some
follow-up
and
we'll
work
on
that
and
we'll
know
that
that'll
be
an
issue.
That'll
be
further
discussed,
so
we've
we've
done
our
due
diligence
on
on
that
particular
item,
so
senator
dondero
loop.
I
believe
you
might
have
had
some
questions
about
the
energy
efficiency
program.
B
Yes,
ma'am,
I
was
just
wondering
if
the
division
had
any
additional
facilities
beyond
the
six
locations
recommended
in
your
program.
That
would
be
candidates
for
similar
upgrades
to
energy
efficiencies.
D
Thank
you
word,
patrick,
for
the
record.
There
certainly
are
many
other
candidates
and
many
other
scope
types
that
could
be
included,
so
the
scope
type
that
we're
using
here
is
high
mass
lights,
which
are
light
emitting
diode,
led
type
fixtures,
as
well
as
interior
for
the
nevada
youth
training
center.
So
so
that
category
could
apply
to
many
other
buildings.
I
would
point
out
that
in
the
park
administration.
A
D
Replaced
the
chiller
in
the
sawyer
building
a
few
years
ago.
It
went
to
what
was
known
as
a
frictionless
chiller
system
and
it
saved
over
30
of
the
power
bill
out
of
the
cooling
system
in
the
sawyer
building,
and
so
when
you,
whenever
we
talk
about
a
project
that
has
this
term
hvac
in
it
in
the
cip,
those
are
also
going
to
create
energy
savings.
D
D
D
Programs
with
nevada
energy
to
do
solar,
photovoltaics
in
the
15,
the
governor
recommended
a
a
very
wide
bro
wide
and
broad
group
of
projects
to
be
completed,
and
that
was
declined
and
I
believe,
largely
because
of
the
proposed
funding
source,
meaning
self-funded
projects
out
of
the
savings.
A
So
I
guess,
mr
patrick,
that
would
lead
me
to
my
next
question,
which
would
be
do
we
plan
on
this
statewide
energy
efficiency
program
becoming
a
regular
discussion
within
these
budgets.
D
We're
patrick
for
the
record,
my
definition
of
planning
is
that
we're
preparing
in
case
that
comes
true
and.
A
D
Yes,
we
are
planning
on
that
coming
to
you
in
the
future,
with
the
hopes
that
it
will
and
that
will
be
determined
by
decision
makers
of
our
board,
as
well
as
the
governor's
office
before
it
gets
to
the
legislature
in
the
future.
A
Okay,
that's
that's
a
great
answer,
something
I
learned
a
long
time
ago
about
energy
is
the
the
cheapest
energy
you
can
get?
Is
the
energy
you
don't
have
to
buy
so
that
you
can
generate
on
your
own,
so
any
energies
and
energy
that
we
can
save
in
the
long
run
benefits
everyone.
A
So,
thank
you.
That's
a
perfectly
appropriate
answer.
Committee
members.
Are
there
any
other
questions
on
this
particular
item?
Miss
vanitas
thompson.
Thank
you,
madam
chairwoman.
E
E
Our
committee
hearings
got
interrupted
by
by
the
pandemic,
but
at
that
time
in
the
technology
world
you
know
we
we
could
be
told
that,
in
order
for
the
state
to
come,
become
100
compliant
with
the
ada
that
we
were
kind
of
on
a
20-year
schedule
in
terms
of
rolling
over
all
the
state
websites
and
in
technology
to
being
ada
accessible
in
this
budget.
Where
we
talk
about
the
the
tangible,
the
building
the
hard
stuff,
can
you
tell
me
do?
Do
we
have
something
like
that?
That's
a
similar
schedule.
Does
this
2.5
million
dollars?
E
D
We're
patrick
for
the
record.
We
haven't
been
asked
that
question
at
the
legislature
in
a
number
of
years,
but
one
question
that
had
come
with
that
in
the
past.
Let's
say
over
20
years
ago
would
be
you
know.
When
will
we
be
done?
You
know
so.
D
Question
are
we
at
a
maintenance
level
and.
B
D
So
you
know
we,
the
state
still
has
many
buildings.
D
The
ada
program
throughout
the
years
is
to
create
accessible
routes
and
program,
accessibility
and.
C
D
And
so
there's
all
these
various,
almost
scientific
rules
about
how
to
be
ada
compliant,
and
so
you
know
one
of
the
goals
20
years
ago-
is
to
slowly
remove
from
the
inventory
these
older
buildings
that
would
just
be
so
expensive
to
to
to
modify
make
these
small
modifications.
D
And
so
you
know
this
program
is
certainly
not
going
away
and
it's
about
program,
accessibility
and
when,
when
individuals
requiring
accessibility,
get
hired
or
a
program
moves
into
a
new
new
building
that
might
necessitate
that
building
to
have
some
some
of
these
hard
and
fast
building
items
to
be
improved,
and
so
we
can't
predict.
D
We
can't
predict
that,
but
we're
kind
of
chipping
away
at
this,
as
as
as
the
share
stated
kind
of
a
steady
state
level,
as
opposed
to
going
highs
and
lows,
and
so
for
many
years
we've
been
working
at
around
a
two
million
dollar
target
to
hit
the
highest
profile
highest
priority
items.
We
certainly
address
department
of
justice
issues
immediately.
I
believe,
there's
emergency
a
little.
D
Item
in
there
to
address
when
employ
new
employees
come
about
or
new
program
programs
need
new
accessibility
features,
and
so
that's
a
little
bit
about
the
history
and
where
that's
going,
but
thank
you
for
the
question.
It's
certainly
not
a
program,
that's
going
away
and
we're
going
to
say
that
we're
done.
Thank
you.
E
Okay,
I
appreciate
that
because
it
seems
to
be
that
we
put
great
time
and
energy
when
you
know
we
have
these
lawsuits
hanging
over
us
like
the
sword
of
damocles
and
and
then
we
get
10
years
away
from.
You
know,
commitments
we
made
and
you
can
see
the
enthusiasm
or
the
political
will
to
make
sure
that
we're
doing
stuff
drop
off.
But
it
sounds
like
we're
staying
on
track
for
where
we
intended
to
be.
We
haven't
lost
the
enthusiasm
for
the
priority
and
I
appreciate
that.
A
A
D
Nevada
system
of
higher
education-
here
we
see
unlv
academic
research
and
engineering
building.
D
I
D
You
can
see
here
that
it's
going
to
be
west
of
ham
hall,
the
concert
hall
and
east
of
science
and
engineering
and
tom
beam
engineering.
It
will
be
integral
with
those
other
two
engineering
buildings
as
part
of
the
engineering.
D
School,
this
project
comes
with
some
issues
related
to
coordination
in
getting
utilities
to
the
building
to
be
most
effective
for
the
operations
of
the
university.
So
you
see
this
yellow
line
here.
This
is
a.
C
H
A
D
Thank
you
very
much
yes,
so
so
this
some
of
the
excitement
that
we
get
to
get
to
work
with
daily
is
our
engineering
systems,
and
so
in
order
to
heat
and
cool
that
building,
we've
worked
with
unlv
and
they
have
a
central
plant
for
heating
and
cooling
that
we're
planning
on
tying
into
some
of
the
supply
lines
over
over
by
the
white
hall.
D
Annex
so
see
where
that
yellow
line
kind
of
ends
by
that
number
six
there
there's
a
there's
a
vault
there
that
we're
going
to
tie
in
our
heating
and
cooling
piping,
and
so
that
way,
unlv
won't
be
maintaining
chillers
in
this
new
building.
They
won't
be
maintaining
boilers
in
this
new
building
will
be
there'll,
be
a
bigger
central
plant
for
ease
of
maintenance
and.
H
D
That
will
that
creates
this
need
to
run
run
this
trench
line
to
our
proposed
new
building.
D
I
would
also
point
out,
in
the
area
of
utilities,
we've
recently
learned
that
there's
some
unresolved
issues
in
the
fiber
optics
area
and
so
we'll
be
diving
more
deeply
in
those
to
enable
the
schedule
to
be
upheld,
and
so
I
think
we
re
sent
over
a
schedule
on
this
project
of
around
18
or
19
months
of
construction
time
frame
over
to
lcd
fiscal
and
about
the
time
we
hit
the
release
button.
For
that
information
we
get
info.
D
We
get
information
from
our
design
team,
as
well
as
our
construction
management
team
that
there's
some
unresolved
issues
regarding
fiber
optics,
and
so
that
is
planned
to
be
worked
through
in
a
in
a
diligent
manner
to
keep
this
project
on
on
schedule
and
still
within
budget.
This
is
not
seen
as
a
major.
B
D
D
So
here
we
have
a
73
million
688
689
dollar
proposed
total
budget
for
the
engineering
building.
That's
broken
down
into
two
primary
areas:
the
professional
services,
which
is
our
construction
administration,
that's
being
conducted
by
our
in
our
design
engineering
group.
We
also
have
materials
testing
as
part
of
making
the
building
safe
from
a
materials
perspective,
and
then
the
fee
for
the
public
works
division
is
in
this
3.6
million
dollar
number.
D
D
D
That's
my
presentation
on
this
project.
I
believe
unlv
is
available
to
help
us
with
any
other
commentary,
questions
and
justification.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
so
I
think
the
first
thing
that
I
need
to
ask,
because
of
all
the
issues
that
have
arisen
in
previous
sessions
with
projects
and
partnering
with
unlv
is
this
project
will
be
a
public
works
project,
correct.
D
A
Okay,
well,
I
think
you
know
which
direction
I'm
leaving.
So
I
guess,
if
you
could.
D
Thank
you
word,
patrick,
for
the
record.
Certainly,
the
funding
split
is
up
to
the
up
to
the
agencies.
You
know,
as
we
went
over
our
process,
to
go
through
these
projects
and
so
the
that's
the
agency's
proposal
to
the
state.
I
believe
it's
also
part
of
the
overall
commitment
that
they
made
early
on,
and
so
any
agency
can
request
any
type
of
funding
proposal
that
they
wish,
and
this
is
unlv's
proposed
funding,
split.
C
A
And
do
we
have
someone
from
unlv
available.
H
We
should
have
some
folks
on
the
line
from
unlv,
but
I
can
tell
the
committee
and
you,
madam
chair,
that
at
a
high
level,
what
the
plans
will
be
would
be
to
issue
debt
for
unlv
share
of
this.
And,
as
you
know,
we
do
collect
what
we
call
capital,
improvement
fees
and
those
capital
improvement
fees
would
be
used
to
service
that
debt.
Unlv
representatives
may
have
more
detail
for
the.
E
So,
on
the
issuance
of
bonds
with
the
debt
paid
by
student
fees,
are
those
fees
already
contemplated
within
kind
of
the
the
fees
that
have
already
are
anticipated
to
be
raised
at
the
institution,
or
would
that
be
an
additional
amount
to
the
student
fees
that
we
are
seeing
at?
I
think
their
unlv
specific
right
institutions,
student
fees
for
for
building
buildings
is,
is
assigned
to
its
own
institution
right.
I
remember
correctly.
H
Madam
share
for
the
record
andrew
klinger,
that's
correct!
So
when
we
collect
registration
fees,
there's
a
portion-
as
you
know,
that
goes
to
the
general
fund.
There's
a
portion
that
goes
to
capital
improvement
fees,
general
improvement
fees,
there's
a
there's,
a
list
of
categories,
if
you
will
for
those
fees,
and
so
the
fees
that
are
anticipated
to
be
used
for
this
project-
are
those
capital
improvement
fees
that
are
already
being
collected.
E
And
I
think
that's
what
I
wanted
to
hear,
because
I
think
that
we
are
from
you
folks
that
it's
a
three
percent
increase
in
those
fees.
So
what
I
was
trying
to
gauge
just
the
arithmetic
if
this
was
gonna,
be
an
an
additional
assessment
on
top
of
that
three
percent
or
if
that
three
percent
was
already
already
had
in
consideration.
The
specific
project.
H
Yeah,
it
would
be
contained
within
the
existing
fees
and
and
we
had
issued
bonds
in
october
of
19
for
what
was
originally
going
to
be
phase
one
of
this
project,
unlv
repurposed,
those
for
a
parking
structure,
and
so,
though,
that
debt
is
being
serviced
with
actually
parking
revenue
which
then
freed
up
what
was
originally
anticipated
to
be
capital
improvement
fees
that
will
now
go
back
to
this
project.
H
Yeah,
that's
correct
the
amount
that
was
originally
scheduled
for
the
20
million
that
was
issued
in
october.
That
is
now
being
take
care
taken
care
of
of
parking
revenue
due
to
these
funds
being
reallocated.
I
guess
to
the
parking
structure
and
I
can
give
you
the
specific
numbers.
I
don't
have
the
specific
numbers
in
front
of
me.
E
B
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
jean
bach,
for
the
record
and
the
cfo
for
unlv
and
as
far
as
the
funding,
we
are
prepared
to
go
up
for
new
new
financing
for
the
unlv
share
and
we
are
already
working
on
the
step,
taking
the
steps
to
prep,
for
that.
Should
the
funding
be
approved
by
the
state
legislature,
the
funding
source
for
the
unlv
share
of
debt
service
will
be
covered
through
the
capital
improvement
fee,
similar
to
what
cfo
klinger
said.
That
fee
is
charged
on
a
per
credit
hour
basis
to
all
students.
B
B
We
had
originally
planned
to
pay
for
that
service
in
the
previous
bond
issue
from
capital
improvement
fees,
but
we
have
repurposed
those
bonds
since
we
were
unable
to
use
them
in
the
2019
21
biennium.
We
repurpose
those
bonds
for
our
parking
structure
and
those
revenues
are
now
going
to
be
paid
out
of
parking
revenues
and
therefore
the
cif
capital
improvement
fees
have
been
released
and
will
be
used
for
this
financing.
B
Madam
chair
gene
bach
for
the
record
that
is
correct.
The
parking
structure
is
just
being
built
and
it
will
be
funded
through
parking
revenues.
The
capital
improvement
fees
which
are
charged
to
the
students
are
being
used
for
the
debt
service
will
be
used
for
the
debt
service
for
the
engineering
building.
A
Okay,
I
had
a
couple
of
other
members
wish
to
be
recognized
for
some
questions,
so
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
go
to
them
and
then,
if
we
need
to
dig
any
deeper,
we
can
bring
up
the
folks
from
the
actual
engineering
department
to
to
discuss
their
building.
So
I
believe,
senator
kitkefer.
You
had
a
question.
C
C
B
Madam
chair,
I
can
answer
that
question
senator
keep
conferring
through
through
the
chair
again.
This
is
gene
bach
for
the
record.
We
have
pledged
capital
improvement
fees,
a
combination
of
capital,
improvement
fees
and
donor
funds.
So,
to
the
extent
we
can
use
donor
funds
that
will
reduce
the
amount
of
capital
improvement
fees
that
we
need
to
allocate
to
the
project
which
will
then
free
those
capital
proven
fees
up
for
other
capital
investments
for
the
campus.
C
And
then
I
think,
maybe
for
mr
klinger,
I
would
be
interested
in
seeing
probably
for
both
of
our
research
universities,
the
the
total
revenues
collected
through
these
capital
improvement
fees
specifically,
and
then
what
the
schedule
is
on
payment.
What
is
outstanding
against
those
liabilities
and
if
there
are,
if
there
are
any
balances
that
have
been
created
by
these
fees,
being
generated
I'll,
be
interested
in
this
one.
H
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
for
the
record
andrew
klinger
chief
financial
officer.
We
we
can
follow
up
with
that
information.
A
A
That's
that
works
out
great.
So
with
that,
I
just
I
met
him.
E
Yes,
oh,
I
was
unmuted
the
whole
time.
Thank
you.
Sorry.
I
guess
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I've
got
something
right
in
terms
of
timelines,
okay,
just
so
that
I
make
sure
I
got
it
right,
so
we
approved
the
cip
budget,
it
last
it
this
this
last
time
and
then
we
had
to
pull
it
back
because
of
the
special
session
cuts.
E
But
when
we
approved
the
the
general
fund
appropriation,
so
you
so
you
guys
had
already
gone
out
and
bonded
on
a
project
and
then
and
then
when,
when
we
had
to
pull
it
back,
you
that's
when
you
made
that
switch
on
the
your
own
bonding
authority
or
the
parking
and
re
and
then
at
the
board
of
regents
level
level
changed
the
payment
for
that.
H
Madam
chair
for
the
record
andrew
klinger
chief
financial
officer,
assemblywoman,
you
got
it
exactly
right,
so
the
the
legislature
in
2019
approved
this
project.
We
had
a
requirement
for
a
match
of
20
million,
so
we
issued
bonds
in
october
of
2019
for
our
20
million.
Obviously,
the
pandemic
hit
that
spring
and
the
state
funds
were
cut.
So
we
then
repurposed
that
20
million
in
bonds
that
we
issued
in
october
of
19
for
the
parking
structure
on
tropicana,
so
yeah.
You
think
you
have
it
right.
E
H
Originally,
as
the
the
project
was
contemplated,
and
certainly
public
works
can
can
jump
in
on
this,
what
was
approved
in
2019
was
actually
a
phased
approach,
so
the
40
million
total
that
was
approved
in
2019
was
originally
intended
to
be
phase
one
of
this
project.
The
project
you're
seeing
now
is
the
entire
project.
E
A
We're
we've
all
been
aware
of
this
one,
and
may
I
ask
one
question:
madam
chair
senator
donderolu,
I
would
just.
B
Like
you
to,
and
not
a
big
long
conversation,
but
just
kind
of
give
us
some
overview
of
what
the
enrollment
is
for
that
building
and
what
the
growth
trend
will
be
when
we
get
to
to
a
building
and
are
we
incorporating
any
students
in
the
engineering
design?
Are
we
using
their
newfound
expertise
as
they
go
through
the
university?
I
I
150
are
phd
students
and
in
terms
of
the
growth
when
I
took
over
as
dean
in
2010,
we
had
800
students.
Today
we
are
20
close
to
2
900
students,
so
that's
like
a
70
80
percent
growth,
and
this
has
been
year-on-year
five
percent
growth
and
we
anticipate
that
both
will
continue,
especially
in
the
area
of
computer
science.
Cyber
security,
computer
engineering,
those
type
of
areas
and
our
phd
program
20
years
ago,
was
something
like
60
students.
Now
we
have
150
more
than
doubled,
and
this
is
not
just
a
head
count.
I
I'm
also
talking
about
graduation
rates.
About
10
years
ago
we
were
having
80
graduating
bsrpa.
I
This
year
we
graduated
347
students
pretty
close
to
tumble
phd,
also
doubled
from
12
students
10
years
ago
to
28
students
this
year
and
with
the
phd
students.
Of
course,
you
fund
them
with
research
funds
that
have
grown
by
more
than
double
in
the
last
10
years,
so
everything
has
doubled
over
10
years
in
the
next
10
years.
I
expect
this
trend
to
grow,
and
this
will
definitely
help
us
with
the
local
economic
diversification
and
workforce
development.
I
Actually,
if
you
really
look
at
the
areas
that
the
state
identified
as
important
for
economic
diversification
of
the
sikh
areas
for
our
courses
and
degree
programs
offered
by
general
engineering,
so
this
is
definitely
a
worthwhile
effort
and
I
think
we've
been
asking
for
about
how
hopefully
this
come
through,
and
then
you
asked
a
question
of
students
being
part
of
this.
I
Our
students
work
in
the
construction
industry
as
interns,
and
they
get
of
course,
full
employment.
60
of
our
students
stay
back,
especially
in
civil
and
construction,
so
many
of
our
students
are
contributing
to
this
project.
The
company,
which
did
the
cmr
for
this,
is
owned
by
one
of
alumni
of
unlv
engineering.
So
so
there
is
a
lot
of
our
students
working
on
these
projects
all
the
time
not
directly,
but
as
interns
employees.
B
Thank
you
very
much.
I
know
several
graduates
for
many
years
and
they
all
sing
the
praises
as
they
move
on
that
it's
a
wonderful
engineering
school.
So
thank
you
very
much.
A
Not
seeing
any
thank
you
very
much
to
unlv
and
and
to
the
dean
of
engineering,
we're
we've
had
this
conversation
a
couple
times
before.
Hopefully
this
one
will
come
to
fruition.
Okay,.
A
Fingers
crossed
thank
you
for
being
here
today,
so
with
that
committee
members.
I
think
the
next
item
that
we,
I
believe,
the
c12,
the
well
welding
lab
edition
and
renovation.
Mr
patrick.
D
We're
patrick
for
the
record,
this
is
project
number
21,
c12,
the
welding
laboratory
edition
and
renovation
at
great
basin
college
in
elko,
and
so
here
you
see
see
the
building
right
off
the
edge,
the
or
the
campus
right
off
the
edge
of
the
interstate.
So
when
you
drive
by
there,
you
see
all
those
red,
roofs
and
we'll
move
to
the
next
slide.
That
demonstrates
that
and.
D
D
Again
was
part
of
the
budget
reductions.
It
was
funded
originally
through
full
design.
We've
now
done
approximately
a
third
of
that
design,
which
we
call
schematic
design
so
we'll
need
to
complete
the
design
and
then
and
then
get
into
construction
on
this
project.
The
total
budget
for
this
project
is
6.3
million
dollars,
of
which
professional
services
is
800
000
and
the
building
with
minor
copying.
The
center
of
these
is
approximately
5.5
million
dollars
and
we're
available
for
questions
on
this
item.
A
Hey,
I
think
the
the
breakdown
is
is
very
good.
It's
excellent
explanation.
A
I
guess
my
one
question
would
be
to
make
sure
that
the
coordination
efforts
on
this
I
mean
when
you're
making
doing
an
addition
and
a
renovation-
and
you
have
a
program-
that's
in
full
swing.
That's
in
high
demand.
How
do
you
balance
all
those
pieces
and
get
the
project
done.
D
Thank
you,
madam
chairwork,
patrick
for
the
record,
and
so
in
our
earlier
discussions.
We
talked
about
phasing
and
occupied
facility
allowances,
and
so
we
have
one
of
those
on
this
project.
So
the
intent
here
is
that
the
new
facility
would
be
constructed,
certainly
attaching
to
existing
facilities
and
in
the
middle
of
the
campus.
So
there's
a
great
level
of
coordination,
as
you
pointed
out
with
the
university,
but
the
intent
is
to
keep
the
keep
the
welding
portion
of
this
school
up
and
running,
and
so
there
are
17
welding
stations
in
the
existing
building.
H
D
D
A
J
A
J
Chair
and
it's
it's
mainly
just
being
new
to
this
committee,
but
I
I
noticed
on
the
the
engineering
building
for
the
university
of
nevada
las
vegas,
the
agency
portion
was,
it
was
a
50
50
split
between
the
state
and
the
agency
portion,
and
it
looks
like
with
this
welding
lab.
This
split
is
quite
different.
It's
you
know:
5.7
million
to
600
000.
What's
how?
How
does
that
work.
D
Poor
patrick
for
the
record,
thank
you
for
asking
the
question.
We've
we've
went
over
our
a
process
that
goes
through
initial
requests
from
the
using
agencies,
and
part
of
that
is
the
using
agency.
Requ
makes
a
recommendation
as
to
what
the
match
will
be
if
any,
and
so
certainly
the
university
system
probably
has
somebody
that
could
speak
to
this
as
well.
But,
historically
speaking,
the
colleges
have.
H
D
Smaller
fees
and
lesser
capital
fees,
if
any
in
there
in
their
fees
and
so
this
six
hundred
thousand
dollars,
is
something
that
has
been
promised
from
the
great
basin
college
and
that's
what
was
been
as
part
of
the
project
from
the
get-go
and
so
to
my
knowledge
back
when
there
were
community
colleges
and
now
one
remaining
and
still
colleges.
D
Now
there
haven't
been
any
that
approached
the
50
mark
oftentimes,
that's
a
university
type
of
an
offering
for
the
the
the
big
awesome
buildings
that
go
into
the
university
buildings
as
opposed
to
the
colleges.
A
B
A
B
Basin
college,
our
enrollments
are
much
less
than
the
universities
in
total
number
of
students,
plus
our
fees
are
smaller
per
registration
per
credit
hour
for
the
registration
fees.
So
therefore,
we
have
a
smaller
amounts
going
into
our
capital
improvement
fee
bucket.
Each
year
we
generate
about
300
000
a
year
in
capital,
improvement
fees,
so
therefore
our
match,
so
that
we
were
not
issuing
debt
another
thing
and
could
still
continue.
Some
of
our
other
deferred
maintenance
projects.
J
Yeah,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
so
I
guess
my
my
ques
my
question
in
this
and
I
was
gonna
save
it
for
the
end
when
we
went
through
all
the
projects,
but
I
can
ask
this
portion
of
it
now.
If,
if
you
would
indulge
me
so
when
you're
choosing,
when
I'm
assuming
that
these
five
projects
were
not
the
only
projects
that
were
submitted
for
review,
so
when
you're
looking
at
what
projects
are
going
to
be
chosen,
do
you
it
does
is
there
is,
is?
J
Is
the
ability
to
match
a
criteria
or
do?
Is
that
considered
at
all
or
in
that
in
that,
in
that
selection
process,.
D
I
D
That
has
a
high
level
of
consideration,
but
for
the
university
system,
the
the
state
public
works
board,
who
makes
a
recommendation
to
the
governor,
has
throughout
time
follow
the
board
of
regents.
C
A
A
D
Yes,
we're
patrick
for
the
record.
This
is
21-13
the
renovation
of
marlette
lecture
hall
for
the
western
nevada
college
back
here
in
carson
city,
and
so
here
you
see.
I
D
C
D
This
project
was
funded
as
as
a
planning
project
through
full
design
and
that
the
budget
reductions
affected
this
and
it
was
reduced
to
through
schematic
only
this
30
percent
completion
of
design.
So
this
project
will
complete
the
design
and
then
construction
of
this
renovation.
D
It
will
configure
it
from
120
seat
auditorium
style
to
an
exceeding
classroom
to
a
more
collaborative
61-seat
classroom
around
tables.
Basically,
so
this
is
a
1.5
million
dollar
project
which
professional
services
to
complete
the
design
and
provide
construction
administration
at
approximately
two
hundred
thousand
dollars,
and
the
construction
with
contingency
is
estimated
at
one
point
two
million
dollars,
but
that
would
be
available
for
any
questions.
A
I
have
no
questions.
It's
pretty
self-explanatory
and
we've
talked
about
this
one
before
so
committee
members.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions
on
this
particular
item.
A
So
I
believe
the
next
item
is
21mo6,
which
is
the
deferred
maintenance
projects,
and
this
is
where
we
get
into
the
heck
check
discussion
so
for
the
new
members
and
to
refresh
my
memory
and
to
make
sure
that
we're
all
on
the
same
page,
because
I
know
this
is
going
to
come
up
if
you
would
give
us
the
tutorial
on
heck
so
that
the
committee
all
knows
where
we're
coming
from,
and
then
we
can
have
conversations
about
what
these
projects
actually
are.
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
patrick.
D
Thank
you,
we're
patrick
for
the
record.
First
hec
stands
for
higher
education,
capital,
construction
and
scheck
stands
for
special
higher
education
and
capital
construction,
and
so
this
this
has
evolved
from
a
system
that
was
statutory
and.
D
And
funded
largely
through
slot
taxes
and
the
slot,
taxes
have
been
decreasing
throughout
the
last
decade
and
now.
D
Has
been
15
million
dollars
in
the
cip
for
at
least
the
last
20
years,
and
originally
there
was
a
five
million
dollar
slot
tax
investment
and
a
10
million
dollar
of
bonding
investments
that
the
committee
would
see.
D
The
university
system
has
a
complex
system
and
a
grading
system
for
the
various
projects
that
are
planned
to
be
included
in
this
and
there's
a
distribution
formula.
They
use
to
go
through
the
various
campuses,
and
with
that
I
would
be
available
for
any
questions
and
look
for
support
from
the
system.
Thanks.
A
D
We
certainly
do
so.
This
is
largely
a
pass-through,
but
we
do
provide
some
review
of
that
before
paying
the
bills,
and
so
we
receive
invoices
and
usually
those
invoices
come
as
lump
sum
from
each
institution
and
and
so
we
review
and
approve
the
list
of
projects
as
part
of
that
payment
process.
A
And
I
guess
my
concern
has
always
been
that
it's
just
been
a
standard
blanket
amount
that
we
have
supported,
whether
the
projects
got
up
to
that
level
or
not.
We
don't
see,
as
we
saw
earlier
in
our
previous
documents,
the
explanations
on
the
different
maintenance
items
that
needed
to
be
taken
care
of
through
energy
efficiency
or
through
ada
or
roofing.
We
just
see
a
general
list
and
and
assumed
15
million
dollars
to
be
going
towards
it,
not
knowing
really
where
it
is.
So
those
are
some
of
my
concerns
on
this.
A
I
just
wanted
to
make
the
committee
aware
of
how
this
goes
senator
key
keffer
did
you
have
any
questions.
C
I
think
you
made
them
sure
they're
a
couple.
There
seems
to
be
a
difference
between
or
discrepancy
between,
the
projects
that
are
going
to
be
funded
by
this
between
the
governor's
office
budget
earth
between
the
governor's
proposed
budget.
Let's
come
forward
from
nc.
Are
we
on
the
same
page
with
what
the
projects
are
at
this.
D
D
I
would
look
to
some
to
phone
a
friend
on
that
one
with
mr
klinger.
I
know
we've
requested
the
list
of
projects
and
provided
a
list
from
the
system
to
lcb
fiscal
within
the
last
few
weeks,
and
that's
what
we
do
know
here
at
public
works.
H
Yeah,
madam
chair
for
the
record
andrew
klinger,
chief
financial
officer,
mr
patrick,
is
correct.
We
did
supply
a
list
of
43
projects
spread
across
all
of
the
institutions
that
comes
up
to
14.8
million
dollars
and
projects.
H
C
I
appreciate
that
I'll
cross-reference.
Those
lists
did
so
you
know
we
just
heard
about
you
know
one
new
one
new
big
building
in
recent
years.
Over
the
past
decade,
we've
added
a
lot
of
square
footage
to
our
campuses,
but
this
this
allocation
for
maintenance
funding
from
the
state
remains
deferred.
C
From
the
state
remains
fairly
flat,
totally
flat,
how
much
how
much
funding
does
does
the
system
put
into
maintenance
of
its
facilities
and
then
do
you
have
a
total
deferred
maintenance
list
and
what
is
the
value
of
all
of
those
projects.
H
Madam
chair
for
the
record,
andrew
klinger,
chief
financial
officer,
so
the
campuses-
and
I
know
unlv-
is
just
completing
a
complete
building
assessment
on
their
campus.
Now,
not
all
of
the
campuses
have
done
a
complete
assessment,
but
what
we
did
over
the
summer
is,
we
did
identify
what
we
thought
were
critical,
deferred
maintenance
projects
and
put
them
into
basically
five
classes
class,
one
being
projects
that
were
critical
within
the
next
two
years
class.
Two.
H
A
Thank
you
senator
for
the
question
I'll
go
to
senator
ratty
next.
B
A
You
all
righty
other
members
of
the
committee
at
this
time,
mr
klinger,
you
gave
a
very
comprehensive
answer.
I
think
you
took
care
of
everything
there.
A
We
look
forward
to
getting
that
list
and
being
able
to
go
over
it
and
take
a
good
look.
So
I
I
appreciate
you
sharing
that
with
the
staff,
so
seeing
no
other
questions
on
the
system
of
higher
education,
deferred
maintenance.
I
believe,
mr
patrick,
we
can
move
on
to
the
department
of
tourism
and
cultural
affairs.
D
A
A
I'm
sorry,
mr
patrick,
I
I
apologize.
Mr
levitt,
did
you
have
a
question
for
right
now?
I
just
saw
it
pop
up.
J
Yeah,
thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
I
just.
I
wanted
to
wait
until
the
end,
because
my
question
was
about
all
the
projects
as
a
whole
and
I
didn't
want
to
get
into
it
when
when
they
were
discussing
each
individual
project-
and
this
may
be
a
question
for
the
for
the
border
against
my
question
is
is,
is
I
know
that
there
was
several
projects
submitted
to
the
board
of
regents
and
kind
of
a
follow-up?
J
To
my
previous
question,
I
I
wanted
to
get
like
an
idea
of
maybe
a
list
of
those
projects
that
were
submitted,
how
the
how
they
were
chosen
as
far
as
criteria
goes
just
so
I
can
get
an
understanding
of
where,
where
the,
where
the
projects
that,
where
the
projects
fall
and
and
how
they're
chosen,
because
you
know
I
know
it's-
not
arbitrary
and
maybe
more
specifically,
I
I
was
a
little
surprised
that
nevada
state
college
was
left
off,
that
list,
nevada,
state
college
being
being
in
my
district,
and
I
know
that
they
didn't
receive
any
any
plein
air
construction
funds
for
for
their
project,
and-
and
I
was
just
wondering
if,
if
those
those
projects
that
weren't
on
the
on
this
list
here
did
do
those
projects
the
wayside,
are
they
set
aside
for
future
funding
how
that
works?
A
You're
you're
welcome
mr
levitt,
mr
klinger,
if
you'd
like
to
just
go
over
that,
but
mr
levitt,
we
also
did
a
number
of
projects
with
nevada
state
college
in
the
in
the
recent
past.
So
we'll
be
happy
to
make
sure
that
you
get
all
that
information.
But,
mr
klinger,
could
you
go
over
over
the
process
and
and
answer
the
questions
for
mr
levitt?
Please.
H
And
sure
madam
chair
for
the
record
andrew
klinger,
so
mr
levitt
you're,
correct,
we
submitted
to
the
state
public
works
a
list
of
18
recommendations
actually
from
the
board
of
regents.
Now
we
do
produce.
You
know
just
to
your
question
about
you
know:
how
do
these
projects
get
selected?
H
We
do
produce
every
two
years,
a
space
utilization
study
that
determines
you
know
how
the
campus
spaces
are
being
used
and
it's
broken
down
into
different
classification
of
space.
Now
that
is
used
by
the
regions
to
inform
their
decision
making
process
as
they
go
through
and
select
process
or
select
projects.
Sorry
and
those
projects
are
then
voted
on
and
selected
at
a
board
of
regents
meeting
that
we
then
submit
to
to
the
state
public
works
board
and
the
nevada
state
project.
I
think
that
you're
referring
to
was
number
three
on
the
region's
priority
list.
J
Thank
you
for
that,
mr
klinger.
So
any
projects
that
were
left
off
of
this
initial
are
they
are
they
do
they
automatically
come
back?
Do
they
need
to
be
resubmitted
for
future
projects
or
how
does
that
work.
H
Andrew
klinger,
for
the
record,
I
mean
typically
what
what
will
happen
is
you
know
the
region
submits
a
list
of
priority
projects,
certain
projects
get
funded
and
then
we
start
the
process
over
again
and
go
through
the
cycle.
But
what
I've
seen
is
that
projects
that
are
ranked
high
on
the
regents
list
typically
come
back
the
next
biennium
and
are
requested
again.
J
A
No,
no,
not
we
want
everyone
to
have
all
the
information
that
they
need,
and
just
you
know,
mr
lovett,
so
that
you're
aware
a
new
education,
academic
building
was
funded
last
session,
as
well
as,
if
I
remember
correctly,
the
health
and
sciences
building
a
very
passionate
concern
of
a
former
senator
woodhouse,
and
she
was
instrumental
in
making
sure
that
these
two
buildings
were
on
the
list
and
that
we
worked
very
diligently
to
make
sure
that
they
were
there
in
the
health
sciences.
A
Building
is
was
used
from
by
csn
and
by
nsc,
so
those
we
we
tend
to
try
to
be
fair
and
spread
things
out
as
as
much
as
possible
and
look
at
what
the
regents
recommend.
So,
if
that
address
and
I'd
be
happy
to
get
you
any
more
information
that
you'd
like
to
have
on
that
since
you're
you're
new
to
the
committee
there's
a
lot
of
history.
A
You're
welcome
mr
lovett,
so
with
that
I
believe
now
we
can
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
the
department
of
tourism
and
cultural
affairs
and
time
is
getting
to
be
a
little
bit
tight,
so
if
we
could
move
as
as
quickly
as
as
possible.
Mr
patrick,
I
know
you
love
this
stuff,
but
we
got
to
get
through
it
all
today.
Thank
you,
we're
patrick.
C
Thank
you,
kent
lefevre,
for
the
record.
We
have
three
department
of
tourism
maintenance
projects
to
present.
A
These
are
all
100
state
general
obligation,
bond
funds.
A
Hearing
none,
I
believe
we
can
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
the
department
of
vehicles.
This
is
an
advanced
planning
project
for
a
new
facility
at
the
silverado
ranch
location.
D
B
D
So
there's
adobe
work,
that's
been
done
at
the
fort
churchill
state
park
in
recent
years
and,
of
course,
the
main
museum
as
well
as
these
facilities
that
are
on
this
project
come
up,
and
so
we
hire
consultant
professionals,
experts
in
this
working
clay
and
earthen
facilities,
and
so
we
have
no
experts
in
this
area
on
staff.
Nor
do
we
intend
to
to
hire
them
and
with
that
kent
will
present
the
department
of
water
vehicles
project.
Thank.
A
C
Patrick,
thank
you
kent
lafaver,
for
the
record.
This
is
project
21
21p06,
it's
a
planning
project
and
it's
for
the
department
of
motor
vehicles,
the
silverado
ranch
facility
and,
as
you
can
see
on
the
slide,
this
is
located
on
the
southeast
corner
of
valley,
view
and
silverado
ranch.
This
project
will
provide
planning
and
construction
documents
for
a
new
full-service
dmv
to
be
located
at
this
location.
The
project
will
provide
state-of-the-art
facilities
for
customers
in
the
greater
las
vegas
area.
C
The
project
will
have
drive
through
kiosks,
commercial
driving
courses
and
expanded
areas
for
customer
service.
The
budget
for
this
project
is
as
follows:
the
total
budget
is
6.3
million,
broken
out
into
6.2
of
professional
services
and
miscellaneous
dollars.
Fifty
eight
thousand,
this
is
a
hundred
percent
highway.
A
Yes,
miss
haudegee
is
very
excited
to
ask
you
some
questions,
so
I
will
go
to
ms
haudegee.
B
I
just
I'm
curious
about
sorry.
I
was
on
mute,
I'm
curious
about
dates.
If
you
could
just.
I
know
this
is
the
money
committees,
but
I'm
super
excited,
because
this
is
in
again
my
district
and
some
of
the
surrounding
areas,
because
they
are
newer,
know,
haven't
had
many
of
these
services
nearby,
like
inspirada
mountains
and
southern
highlands.
So
I'm
just
curious
as
to
planning
dates.
When
do
you?
When
do
you
foresee
this
project
to
be
unlike
get
started?
When
will
construction
start
and
when's
the
end
projected
end
date.
D
Thank
you,
ward,
patrick,
for
the
record,
we're
looking
for
full
design
funding
here.
So
we
anticipate
the
design
to
be
completed
approximately
two
years
from
now.
Then
we
would
go
out,
go
do
bidding
immediately
thereafter,
and
so
we
would
start
construction
likely
in
the
fall
of
2023
upon
upon
approval
of
funding,
and
then
the
recent
project,
which
was
the
south
reno
dmv,
is
planned
to
be
very
similar
to
this,
which
I
believe
the
construction
time
was
around
20
months.
D
So
we
would
anticipate
during
during
session
of
25.
This
project
would
be
completed.
B
And
just
really
quick,
how
many
people
do
you
expect
to
service
out
of
this
facility.
G
I
forgot
to
turn
my
video
on
here.
We
go
julie,
butler
for
the
record.
The
the
population
to
be
served
would
be
those
from
the
henderson
office.
We
see
about
1500
folks,
a
day
there
and
the
individuals
that
attend
or
that
go
to
the
donovan
office
for
for
their
services
for
their
commercial
driver's
license
services,
and
so
we,
what
were
anticipating
doing
here,
is
closing
the
donovan
office
and
closing
the
henderson
office
as
exists
today
and
then
replacing
them
with
this
new
full-service
facility.
G
B
Good
morning,
tommy
laney
administrator
of
field
services,
division
for
the
nevada
department
of
motor
vehicles
for
the
record
and
madame
vice
chair.
Did
that
answer
your
question,
or
did
you
need
some
additional
information?
No,
that's.
I
think
that
that
pretty
much
answers
that
question,
but
you're
gonna
cl
you
guys,
are
planning
on
closing
both
the
donovan
and
the
henderson
facility.
G
Julie
butler
again
for
the
record:
yes
assemblyman,
we
we
are
planning
to
do
that.
The
there
are
underlying
structural
problems
and
access
problems
with
both
buildings,
the
donovan
and
the
henderson
office,
and
particularly
the
henderson
location
parking,
is
a
real
problem
and
it's
not
able
to
be
expanded.
G
So
the
new
facility
would
include
sufficient
parking
for
the
staff
and
the
customers
to
to
be
able
to
do
their
dmv
business.
B
Madam
chair
just
one
last
question
sure
go
ahead.
Well
so,
but
if
we
open
the
silverado
ranch
location
that
would
alleviate
some
of
the
traffic
to
the
location,
which
maybe
we
wouldn't
need
additional
parking
because
people
would
be
taking
advantage
of
the
other
location.
Is
it
necessary
to
close
that
branch
down.
G
Julie
butler
again
for
the
record.
The
the
issue
that
we
run
into
with
keeping
both
locations
open
is
one
of
a
different
statute
that
limits
us
to
only
it
puts
a
cap
on
the
amount
of
highway
funds
the
department
is
able
to
receive
so
in
order
to
staff
the
henders
to
keep
the
existing
henderson
building
open
and
then
open
a
new
building.
We
would
likely
need
to
increase
the
percentage
of
highway
funds
that
the
department
gets
to
fund
its
operations.
A
Okay,
I
didn't
think
it
was
that
old,
but
I
guess
it
is
time
flies
and
then
you
said
there
were
structural
issues
with
the
donovan
office.
A
I
understand
what
you're
trying
to
do
and
I
totally
get
the
22
cap
but
you're
taking
office,
that's
in
on
north
in
the
north
area
of
the
city
and
closing
it
and
making
everyone
go
all
the
way
out
to
silverado
and
you
can't
get
across
town
like
you
used
to
20
years
ago,
so
it
would
be
a
major
trek,
especially
if
you
enter
the
sahara
I-15
time
warp
of
of
traffic.
So
what
is
the
issue
with
the
donovan
office.
G
Julie
butler
again
for
the
record,
the
location
is
poor.
The
the
parking
is
a
problem
and
it's
it's
hard
to
get
to
and
it's
the
building
is
showing
its
age,
the
actual
the
storefront,
the
actual
storefront
needs
an
overhaul,
the
break
rooms,
the
training
room,
the
restrooms,
they're,
all
old
they're,
showing
their
age
and
and
are
starting
to
fall
in
disrepair
and
tanya
again,
since
you're.
H
B
Absolutely
tommy
laney
again
for
the
record
administrator
nevada
department
of
motor
vehicles.
In
addition
to
what
director
butler
has
already
mentioned,
the
the
location
as
far
as
the
donovan
dmv
initially
upon
build
was
great
for
truckers
because
of
the
again
the
location
that
it
is
north
of
las
vegas.
The
biggest
issue
that
we
have
with
that
property
now
is,
it
has,
in
time
been
built
industrial
naval.
A
We
can
no
longer
hear
you
miss
laney.
I
think
your
volume
went
off.
Can
you
hear
me
now
now
I
can?
Yes,
if
you
could
back
up
just
a
bit
and
we'd
be
good.
B
Yes,
I
apologize
for
that
again,
tony
lainey
for
the
record,
since
the
donovan
dmv
or
I'm
sorry,
the
donovan
cdl
office
has
been
built,
there's
industrial
businesses
that
are
on
both
sides
of
that
property.
What
that
has
led
to
is
the
tractors
actually
have
nowhere
to
park
when
they
come
to
the
donovan
cdl
office.
I
believe
there's
a
peterbilt
or
another
similar
type
property
next
door
that
has
their
trucks
parked
on
the
roadway
and
then
there's
with
the
other
adjacent
property.
B
B
One
of
the
other
things
that
we've
unfortunately
ran
into
with
where
the
donovan
cdl
is
located
now
right
off
of
the
railroad
tracks,
is
that
we
often
in
that
building
are
a
victim
of
vandalization.
We
have
had
copper
stolen
from
the
air
conditioning
units
off
the
top
of
that
building.
A
B
Tommy
laney
for
the
record.
I
have
we,
we
have
not
had
a
schematic
design
of
that
property
done.
Yet
at
this
point,
that's
what
this
request
is
for.
I
can
tell
you
for
the
reno
facility.
We
did
build
that
into
our
design,
where
there
is
parking
and
bypass
in
case.
For
some
reason,
a
commercial
vehicle
did
break
down
on
the
property
so
that
the
trucks
can
get
in
and
out
easily,
and
then
we
also
have
for
our
training
courses
when
the
truckers
come
in
to
do
their
testing
for
their
cdl.
B
We
have
parking
built
in
next
to
those
courses
for
the
truckers
in
case
there's
another
truck
on
the
course
when
they
come
in
that
allows
them
to
wait
in
that
area
until
they
can
pull
on
to
the
course
seeing
how
we
were
able
to
do
that
with
our
new
property
in
south
reno
being
built
up
on
all
sides
of
us.
I
do
believe
that
we
would
have
sufficient
room
on
the
new
property
to
to
do
something
very
similar
is
what
we've
done
here.
B
Tom
delaney
for
the
record
that
is
correct.
Madam
chair.
B
Oh
I
I
apologize.
It
is
again
tommy
laney
for
the
record.
It
is
not
just
cdl.
We
also
house
our
motor
carrier
team
is
in
that
same
building.
I
apologize.
B
C
G
Thank
you
for
the
question,
julie
butler
for
the
record.
No,
we
we
do
not
anticipate
personnel
savings
by
consolidating
what
we
intend
to
do
would
be
move
the
authorized
ftes
from
the
donovan
facility
and
the
henderson
facility
over
to
the
new
building
once
constructed
similar
to
what
we
did
with
the
new
office
in
south
reno.
We
closed
the
office
on
doletti
and
we
closed
the
cdl
office
in
sparks
and
we've
relocated
those
staff
to
the
reno
property.
A
As
well
assemblywoman
gorlo,
I'm
sorry,
I
did
see
you
and
I,
for
I
missed
it,
went
by
too
quick.
Thank
you
very.
B
Much
I
just
had
a
quick
question:
what
happens
to
the
buildings
once
you
leave
them
and
go
into
the
silverado
ranch.
G
Julie
butler
for
the
record,
that
would
be
something
we
would
have
to
discuss
with
state
public
works
and
leasing,
services
and
buildings
and
grounds.
G
I
can
tell
you
for
the
most
recent
building
move
that
we
did
in
terms
of
the
south
reno
dmv,
that
building
actually
belonged
to
the
nevada
department
of
transportation
and
when
dmv
vacated
that
building
on
goletti,
we
turned
that
building
back
over
to
indot,
so
we
would
discuss
them
with
state
public
works
and
leasing
services.
What
would
happen
to
those
other
buildings
at
donovan,
and
I
understand
what
would
happen
there.
D
Madam
chair
ward,
patrick
for
the
record,
yes,
we
would
look
to
repurpose
those
buildings.
Certainly
that
would
be
a
part
of
if
approved.
We
would
look
into
that,
and
so
we've
had
some
initial
thoughts
of
the
donovan
express
office
may
work
for
public
safety
as
some
sort
of
a
satellite
office
and
then,
of
course,
the
henderson
dmv
is
a
larger
structure
over
20
000
square
feet.
I
think
almost
30
000
and
that.
C
A
Thank
you,
okay.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Ms
houdagi
would
like
to
be
recognized
one
more
time.
Thank.
B
You,
madam
chair,
I
know
we're
pressed
for
time,
but
I
I
appreciate
the
second
round
of
questions,
but
my
I
was
very
excited
about
this
project,
but
now
I'm
kind
of
concerned
knowing
that
all
of
the
semi
truck
traffic
is
going
to
be
directed
at
this
residential
impact
study
done
just
because
I've.
You
know
like
with
the
recent
project
with
the
star
x
15.
B
That's
a
lot
of
semi
traffic
that
used
to
use
saint
rose
now
through
some
residential,
suburban
streets,
and
it's
created
a
lot
of
just
disturbance
and
I've
gotten
tons
of
calls
from
residents
in
my
district
regarding
that,
and
so
I'm
concerned
that
again
we're
driving
more
semi
truck
traffic
through
maybe
some
residential
areas.
So
has
there
been
a
residential
impact
study
done.
F
D
There
has
been
no
residential
impact
studies.
There
are
studies
that
are
projected
to
be
done,
including
programming,
traffic
studies
draining
analysis,
zoning
approvals,
but
I
think
falls
into
that
category
and
the
impact
analysis.
So
that
would
be
a
part
of
this
project.
They
have
not
been
completed
to
date.
B
Okay,
and
has
there
been
given
any
thought
to
keeping
them
separate
like
this,
I
guess
using
it
just
for
like
commercial
vehicles
at
a
different
location.
G
Okay,
sure
the
question
is
worth
julie,
butler
again
for
the
record.
We
we
have
not
considered
other
locations.
This
is
a
parcel
of
property
that
the
state
owns
and
if
that
were
the
the
will
of
the
legislature,
we
would
have
to
work
that
out
with
with
state
public
works
and
and
see
what
other
land
is
available.
But
we
do
feel
like
the
design
at
the
at
our
new
south
reno
location.
G
Beautiful
building
it
accommodates
both
commercial
and
non-commercial
customers,
and
it
really
is
a
it's
nice
that
it's
an
all-inclusive
one-stop
shop
for
our
customer
base
and
then
so
that's
why
we
proposed
it
this
way.
D
Patrick
for
the
record,
I
would
point
out
that
in
the
11th
cip,
2011
cip,
there
was
some
evaluation
and
design
completed.
So
this
this
facility
has
land
available,
approximately
20
acres,
which
is
a
larger
piece
of
land
in
south
reno,
so
certainly
the
land
available
will
be
able
to
accommodate
both
of
these
types
of
needs.
Thank
you.
A
B
A
Concerns
so
we
can,
we
can
go
from
there.
B
And
madam
chair,
if
I
could,
this
is
tommy
laney
for
the
record.
I
could
answer
a
little
bit
of
stats
to
the
south
reno
building,
if
you
so
would
like.
As
far
as
traffic
with
the
commercial
vehicles.
A
We
we
don't
need
to
do
that
right
now.
Thank
you.
Well,
we'll
take
that
up
a
little
bit
later,
we're
we're
running
out
of
time,
and
we
do
have
one
more
to
get
to
and
then
public
comment,
but
thank
you
for
the
offer,
I'm
sure
miss
haudegee
and
some
others
are
going
to
be
following
up
with
you
and
then
sharing
that
with
and
we'll
work
with
staff
to
analyze
this
a
little
bit
bit
deeper,
but
we've
definitely
heard
concerns
about
trucks
and
neighborhoods.
A
C
Favorite
for
the
record,
I'd
like
to
present
project
21204,
advanced
planning
for
the
headquarters,
building
and
department
of
public
safety.
This
slide
shows
the
location
in
carson
city
of
that
facility.
This
project
will
be
designed
with
conceptual
design
for
the
department
of
public
safety
headquarters.
This
will
be
a
consolidation
facility
and
provide
a
state
forensics
testing
laboratory.
C
A
So
if
you
could
just
go
over
the
general
timeline
that
we're
looking
at
and
if
you
could
bring
the
map
up
again,
I
can't
quite
figure
out
where
it
was
so.
That's
the
main
drag
through
person
and
I
believe.
D
Thank
you,
ward,
patrick,
for
the
record.
This
is
where
the
national
guard
used
was
before
they
moved
out
onto
edmond.
So
this
is
called.
C
D
Armory
site
and
so
you'll
see
next
door
there.
The
circle,
which
is
labeled
as
the
nevada
state,
railroad
museum,
so.
D
Or
patrick
for
the
record,
I'm
unaware
of
that
term,
but
certainly
when
the
when
the
guard
moved
off
of
this
site,
it
was
a
maintenance
facility,
and
so
there
were
hydrocarbon
issues
and
those
issues.
D
C
A
A
That
committee
members
are
there
any
other
questions
on
this
particular
building,
and
this
will
become
the
new
headquarters.
I
assume.
D
We're
patrick
for
the
record,
so
the
current
vision
for
this
project
is.
It
will
be
approximately
I'm
on
the
wrong
page
here.
Sorry
back
a
couple
pages:
172
000
square
feet:
yeah
172,
000
square
feet
is
what
we're
using
for
the
basis
of
part
of
the
estimate
for
the
preconceptual
design,
and
so
this
project
is
likely
to
need
structured
parking
due
to
the
limited
size
of
the
facility.
D
Thank
you
and
I
would
point
out
that
partner,
public
safety
is
available
and
so
segue
into
any
comments
from
them.
I
would
state
that
last
session
this
was
a
governor
recommended
project,
as
is
with
the
exception
that
the
cannabis
laboratory
facilities
have
been
added
so
last
session.
D
C
Madam
chair,
if
I
may,
this
is
curtis
palmer
with
the
department
of
public
safety
and.
D
D
Director
and
deputy
director
that
is,
but
I
would
be
happy
to
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
this.
This
project
is
designed
is
being
presented
as
conceptual
only
at
this
point,
curtis.
I
David
this
can
you
hear
me:
this
is
george
tagliati
director
of
public
safety.
Please,
director
go
ahead,
thank
you
and
I
I
apologize.
We
were
over
with
senator
dennis
this
morning
and
we
just
switched
back.
I
also
seem
to
be
having.
I
don't
know
if
you
hear
any
feedback.
I
Okay.
Well,
I
don't
I'm
not.
To
be
quite
frank,
I'm
not
familiar
with
the
prior
planning
of
the
headquarters,
building
for
the
department
of
public
safety
that
I
guess
that
originated
during
the
the
last
administration.
I
But
what
has
developed
since
and
we've
had
a
little
bit
of
a
discussion
on
this
amount
of
chair-
is
the
just
the
thought
and
the
proposal
to
move
forward
with
a
state
laboratory
and
one
thought
that
if
we,
we
did
have
a
state
forensic
laboratory
which
also
included
addressing
the
issues
of
the
new
cannabis
industry,
the
quality
control,
etc
for
for
cannabis
that
it
might
be
able
to
incorporate
both
projects
into
one
and
have
a
headquarters
building,
as
well
as
a
laboratory.
I
I
We
also
have
the
office
of
traffic
safety,
who
was
involved
in
this
forensic
part
of
the
laboratory,
where
we've
had
some
studies
done
through
with
amy
davies,
division
of
traffic
safety
with
nitsa
the
federal
entity
and
there's
funding
that
could
be
available
there.
So
we
thought
well
geez
and
maybe
in
a
perfect
world
we
can
put
all
three
projects
together
and
go
forward
knowing
the
environment
we're
in
right
now,
with
you
know,
limited
resources,
covert,
etc,
etc.
I
I
think
one
of
the
things
we
wanted
to
do
was
make
sure
that
we
went.
We
got
the
state
laboratory
idea
out
there
this
session
so
that
it
can.
We
can
get
folks
talking
about
it
and
doing
some
doing
their
own
research
to
see
what
the
needs
are
or
not,
and
I
think
it's
clearly
at
the
time
has
come
because
we're
one
of
two
states
that
don't
have
a
state
laboratory.
I
But
now,
particularly
with
the
passage
of
the
use
of
recreational
marijuana,
we
have
to
again
follow
up
and
there'd
be
nothing
more
useful
in
a
state
laboratory
because
presently
they
outsource
to
a
number
of
different
places.
And
I
know
there's
even
I
read
an
article
in
the
media
here
recently
that
the
state
has
been
following
some
of
these
laboratories
to
ensure
that
the
you
know
we
have
a
standardization
quality
control,
looking
at
intensity
or
of
the
product,
but
also
the
purity,
etc,
etc.
I
There
is
a
large
in
the
state
of
nevada,
there's
still
a
large
illegal
marijuana
effort
out
there.
That
is
a
lot
of
investigation
done
by
the
our
division
of
investigation.
So
the
industry
needs
to
get
some
attention
and
I
think
one
of
the
ways
to
do
it
is
to
have
this
state
laboratory.
So
we
want
to
get
a
dialogue
going
and
when
that
is
ever
built,
that's
a
conversation
for
a
later
date.
I
But
it
was
just
the
idea
that
maybe
we
can
incorporate
a
number
of
projects,
including
the
headquarters
and
maybe
be
more
more.
A
C
A
Stairs
from
the
second
floor
to
the
third
floor,
it
was
just
switching
zoom
meetings,
so
there
are
some
silver
linings
to
this
process
right
now.
You
know,
I
guess
my
question
is
going
to
come
to.
A
I
understand
wanting
to
have
your
headquarters
in
carson
city
makes
sense,
even
though
a
majority
of
your
force
is
in
southern
nevada
and
majority
of
the
dispensaries
are
in
southern
nevada,
so
I
don't
really
want
to
get
into
it
right
now,
but
I
think
we
should,
in
the
future,
at
some
time,
have
a
conversation
about
the
size
of
the
building
where
it
actually
needs
to
be
the
public
safety
building.
The
newer
building,
that's
down
south
right
off
of
the
215,
is
very
nice.
A
Building
the
highway
patrol
building
you've
got
the
campos
building,
but
if,
if
there's
a
need,
I
think
we
need
to
look
at
where
it
best
suits
a
lab
strategically
for
everyone,
and
then
what
the
actual
size
of
a
real
headquarters
would
be.
So
I
appreciate
that
this
is
a
advanced
planning
project,
not
an
actual
planning
project
and
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
time
for
discussion
on
those
issues.
I
I
I
know
I
can
remember
for
years
the
discussion
of
moving
the
dps
headquarters
out
of
the
dmv
building
and
there
were
a
bunch
of
different
locations
over
the
years,
but
again,
I'm
not
familiar
with
that
project
at
all,
but
I
do
know
that
the
state
lab
is
going
to
be.
I
believe
something
that
we
do
have
to
address
and
location
again
is
another
area
for
open
for
debate
where,
where
this
state
lab
would
be-
and
you
know
what
would
again
be
most
effective
and
the
best
place.
A
A
C
Sure
I
appreciate
that
I'll
try
to
be
brief.
I'd
try
to
tell
you,
I
thought
when
you
started
talking
about
a
state
lab
for
marijuana
testing
that
you
were
referring
to
contesting
criminal
investigations.
Things
like
that,
but
are
you
suggesting
that
the
state
take
over
all
testing
of
cannabis
for
commercial
purposes.
I
That's
again
open
for
for
discussion.
I
have
had
discussions
in
coordinated
with
the
governor's
office,
but
also
with
tyler
klemis
and
the
the
folks
who
are
involved
in
the
cannabis
industry
and
the
thought
going
from
for
a
couple
of
reasons:
one.
It
was
just
the
lab
issue
and
then
also
and
for
enforcement
duties
for
possible
felonies
or
any
infractions
of
the
state
law.
So
at
in
the
in
that
discussion,
with
with
tyler
klimas,
we
decided
to
bring
up
at
least
chat
about
the
idea
of
a
state
laboratory.
I
I
felt
that
it
was
necessary
because
we
do
with
the
growth
within
the
state
of
nevada
and
the
fact
that
we
haven't
had
us
we're
one
of
two
states
that
don't
have
a
state
laboratory
that
eventually
the
state
should
address
that
and
have
a
laboratory
located
somewhere,
where
we
can
take
some
of
the
overflow
from
washroom
county
clark,
county
henderson
wherever,
but
right
now,
the
primary
of
services
for
the
state
come
from
washer
and
clark
and
then
also
from
the
rural
areas.
So
that
would
be
for
forensics
dovetailing
again
into.
I
That
is
the
idea
that
the
office
traffic
safety
has
done.
Some
studies-
and
there
is
an
appetite
for
us
for
for
the
federal
government
to
get
more
involved
in
traffic
safety
research
like,
for
example,
most
of
the
cases
where
we
pull
somebody
up
for
driving
under
the
influence
that
would
be
somebody
smells
alcohol
on
the
driver's
breath.
They
do
a
test
boom.
Okay,
that's
dui!
I
We
don't
really
get
into
addictions
and
comorbidities
and
and
the
issues
we
have
with
prescription
drugs
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
and
I
know
the
there's
initiative
within
the
federal
government
that
can
offer
funding
for
further
research
which
again
kind
of
moves
into
a
laboratory
where,
when
we
test
someone
that
we're
testing
to
see,
if
you
know
what
is
or
what
has
impaired
this
driver,
is
it
simply
two
beers
or
are
we
getting
into
also
there's
heroin
or
who
knows
what
else?
I
So
the
statistics
are
for
the
office
of
traffic
safety
and
nationwide
really
haven't
been
that
accurate
because
of
the
fact
that
we
don't
have
that
research
done.
There
could
be
a
lot
more
of
that.
There
could
be
a
lot
more
research
into
marijuana
as
far
as
cannabis
industry.
You
know
what
are
the
good
things,
the
bad
things?
That's
not
my
world,
I'm
not
familiar
with
it,
but
just
the
thought
in
our
discussions
and
brainstorming
was.
I
We
may
be
about
the
time
that
we
bring
this
idea
forward
because
we're
also
looking
at
a
headquarters,
building
and
and
whatever,
and
at
least
not
put
it
off
for
another
session
to
get
to
get
some
sort
of
conversation
going
bring
it
before
you
folks
pure,
and
we
start
getting
people
to
brainstorm
this
thing
and
say:
okay
in
the
future.
I
This
is
what
we
think
we
need
to
do,
and
this
is
what
a
laboratory
could
do
for
us,
and
but
what
we're
trying
to
do
right
now
is
just
get
our
foot
in
the
door.
F
A
You're,
welcome,
senator
and,
and
thank
you
director,
a
lot
of
food
for
thought,
we'll
keep
thinking
about
it,
but
with
the
over
with
the
umbrella
that
we
know
the
position
the
state
is
in
right
now,
but
we
also
know
that
we're
one
of
two
states
that
don't
have
a
state
lab
so
and
that
conversation
has
come
up
a
couple
other
times.
So
with
that
committee
members.
I
don't
believe
there
are
any
other
questions
on
this
particular
item.
A
The
last
page
of
your
notes
is
is
basically
the
projects
that
are
listed.
If
you
have
any
questions
about
those
please
reach
out
to
myself
or
staff,
we'll
be
happy
to
try
to
answer
any
questions
for
you
and
with
that
I
think
our
business
of
the
day
is
actually
concluded.
A
Now
we
will
go
to
public
comment.
It
is
10
38,
we'll
give
folks
a
minute
or
so
so
we'll
come
back
at
about
10
40..
So
if
everyone
would
just
stand
at
ease
for
two
minutes,
I
apologize
to
the
senate
for
running
over
by
a
few
minutes
today,
but
important
discussions
so
we'll
hold
out
for
a
couple
minutes
and
we'll
see
what
public
comment
we
have.