►
From YouTube: 6/3/2023 - Assembly Committee on Natural Resources
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
Thank
you
and
I
am
here,
please
mark
the
members
who
aren't
present
absent
excused
or
present
when
they
arrive.
I
know
they're
presenting
in
other
committees.
So
with
that
we
will
dispense
with
the
introductions
as
I
think
we
all
know
and
go
into
our
bill
hearing
for
Senate
Bill
311
and
welcome
Senator
Hanson.
Please
go
ahead.
Thank.
C
You,
madam
chair
member
of
the
committee,
I'm
Senator
Ira
Hanson,
representing
Senate,
District
14..
This
bill
is
a
very
basic
Bill
and
yep
I,
didn't
say
simple.
I
said
basic
before
I
get
into
bill.
It
only
takes
a
minute
seriously.
I
this
bill
came
about
become
because
of
a
man
named
Rex
flowers.
Rex
was
very
influential
in
Washoe
County,
very
active
in
the
wildlife
Community.
Unfortunately,
Rex
passed
away
two
weeks
ago,
so
this
was
kind
of
his,
but
this
was
his
baby.
C
Essentially,
all
the
bill
does
is
allow
people
who
adults
who
receive
hunting
tags,
big
game
tags,
Antelope
elk,
mule,
deer
and
so
forth.
They
can
give
those
tags
to
somebody
who
is
under
18
years
of
age.
The
whole
bill
literally
reads:
the
commission
may
adopt
regulations
establishing
a
program
Which
authorized
the
person
to
transfer
his
or
her
tag
to
hunt
a
big
gay
mammal
to
any
person
who
is
under
18
years
of
age.
C
Originally
the
May
was
shall
end
out,
put
a
fiscal
note
on
it,
so
to
get
it
out
of
Finance,
we
made
the
Charlemagne
and
the
rest
of
the
bill.
That's
the
whole
bill.
There
were
a
couple
other
sections
which
were
amended
out
at
the
request
of
the
Department
of
Wildlife
I,
didn't
have
anybody
coming
to
testify
on
Saturday
from
from
endow,
but
they
were
supportive
in
finance
of
this
amended
version,
and
that
is
the
entire
bill.
D
Thank
you,
chair,
I
appreciate
it.
We
really
are
tired,
okay,
and
so
maybe
this
will
explain
why
my
question
is
like
this,
but
I
don't
get
it
I
really.
Why
do
we
need
to
transfer
to
under
18
year
olds?
I
know:
we've
done
this
in
the
past,
like
with
people
with
disabilities,
I
think
we
had
a
bill
last
session
or
a
session.
They
kind
of
mushed
together,
I,
just
I,
don't
understand
well,.
C
All
right,
let
me
Ira
Hanson
again.
Let
me
give
you
a
real
a
simple
example:
this
year,
I
applied
for
tags,
Alexis
has
a
nephew
who
was
15
years
old
and
never
had
an
opportunity
to
hunt
who
also
applied.
Unfortunately,
both
of
us
were
not
successful.
Let's
say
I
was
successful
and
he
was
not
and
he
would
like
to
hunt
and
I
in
my
age
honestly
I
hunt
now
to
be
with
my
kids
and
grandkids
and
stuff
like
that.
C
So
this
would
allow
me
because
right
now,
I'm
not
allowed
to
transfer
that
tag
legally
to
anybody
I'm,
the
only
one
that's
allowed
to
use
it,
so
the
commission
will
be
able
to
have
the
policy
changes
to
allow
me
as
an
adult,
to
legally
give
that
tag
to.
In
this
case,
a
15
year
old
young
man
who
wants
the
hunt,
doesn't
come
from
a
hunting
background,
but
give
him
the
opportunity
to
get
out
in
the
field
and
and
go
after
a
big
game.
That's
really
the
whole
Genesis
behind
the
bill.
D
C
Just
I
I
guess
you
could
have
something
like
that
and
that's
where
the
commissioned
up
to
set
up
some
policies
to
try
to
prevent
that
I.
Think
honestly,
this
will
be
used
very
rarely.
Most
people,
when
they
could
tags
are
getting
increasingly
rare.
C
There
were
actually
over
425
000
applications
this
year
for
complete
allocational,
18
000
tags
in
the
entire
State
and
they've
been
trying
aggressively
to
get
younger
people
involved
in
outdoor
sports
and
like
in
every
every
Arena,
you'll,
see
less
and
less
young
people
getting
outdoors,
and
this
is
something
that
for
guys
like
me,
that
have
a
hunting
tradition
in
the
family.
D
The
chair,
saying
I
can
say,
and
I
and
I
thank
you
for
that,
because
that
makes
a
big
difference.
You
know
I
I'm,
not
a
hunter
I
could
not
imagine
hunting,
but
I.
Do
I
am
an
environmentalist
and
I
do
understand
what
Sportsmen
do
for
our
population
and
how
you
are
can
be
environmentalist
and
be
I
know
one
of
some
of
our
members,
so
that
I
like
because
I
I'm
sure
that
is
true
with
under
18..
D
C
I
think
I
think
Ira
Hansen
I
think
you'll
find
that
we
we
share
a
common
interest.
I
think
that
you'll
find
the
Sportsman
Community
or
some
of
the
most
aggressive
conservationists
you'll,
see
anywhere
and
for
decades
now,
I've
been
putting
their
their
dollars
where
their
mouths
are
and
really
been
instrumental
in
helping
keep
the
game
populations
in
Nevada
going
forward.
So
we
we
share
a
common
bond
in
wanting
to
do
things
good
for
the
environment,.
F
Thank
you,
chair
and
Sandra
thanks
for
coming
and
answering
our
questions
on
this
highly
concerning
bill,
I
I
know
how
difficult
it
is
to
get.
F
F
C
I
is
he
more
likely
to
hit
the
target
than
you
or
something
no
I
the
bill?
Honestly
at
the
example
you
give,
though
there
is
something
about
this
there's
a
legal
question
here.
If,
for
example,
somebody
in
my
family
is
under
18
and
I'm
going
out
with
them
and
we
do
want
to
hunt,
it
is
illegal
currently
for
me
to
allow
them
and
the
scenario
he
was
using.
Let's
say
some
manure
gets
the
tag
and
he
goes
out
there
and
he
says.
C
F
All
seriousness
chair,
I
I,
do
just
want
to
go
on
and
say
that
this
is
a.
This
is
a
great
bill
and
it
under
that
perfect
scenario
that
you're
talking
about
it,
encourages
youth
to
get
out
and
if,
for
example,
if
I
had
multiple
Deer
tags
over
the
course
of
my
life
and
I
did
have
a
nephew
or
somebody
come
over
or
even
one
of
my
little
kids
right
and
I
want
to
get
them
out
there
doing
it.
We're
not
increasing
the
number
of
tags
that
are
available.
F
C
G
C
The
physical
note
I'm
sorry
Ira
Hansen
for
the
record
out
of
the
fiscal
note,
we'll
end
out
put
on
a
fiscal
nut.
I
think
it
was
17
000
for
the
first
year
and
something
similar
the
second
so
I
wanted
Xiao,
because
we
have
a
similar
program
that
Senator
Titus
put
in
a
couple
years
ago,
and
it
really
hasn't
been
aggressively
implemented.
So
we
did
go
with
the
shall
you'll
notice.
Senator
Titus
is
a
co-sponsor
on
the
bill,
but
because
to
get
out
of
Finance.
C
G
C
You
you're
welcome
just
so
you
know
too
I
we've
had
extensive
conversations
with
a
new
director,
Department
of
Wildlife
Alan
Janae
and
Tim
Robb,
who
is
the
the
rural
liaison
for
the
governor,
is
also
very
much
aware
of
this.
So
there'll
be
several
new
appointments
on
the
Wildlife
Commission,
so
I
think
you'll
see
this
going
forward
very
aggressively.
Assuming
it
passes.
H
C
Ira
hanskin
very
interesting
question.
First
of
all,
the
odds
of
getting
tagged.
The
tag
allocation
process
is
very,
very
strict.
They're,
the
ability
of
somebody
to
apply
and
get
multiple
tags
is
almost
unheard
of.
Frankly,
in
fact,
it
is
unheard
of
you
you
just
like
I
said
in
my
family
I
bet
we
had
altogether
over
25
applications
and
we
got
three
tags.
So
the
idea
of
getting
multiple
tags
and
then
being
able
to
sell
those
I
think
number
one
that
would
be
illegal
under
current
law
and
I
would
assume.
C
The
commission
would
also
ensure
that
that
kind
of
illegal
practice
would
remain
illegal.
H
A
C
Madam,
chair,
Ira,
Hanson,
again
yeah
you're,
not
if
you're
14
to
18
you
have
to
hunt
a
hundred
in
that
age
bracket
has
to
be
in
the
presence
of
an
adult,
an
adult
as
I
recall,
is
19
and
up
so
yeah.
We
have
a
whole
bunch
of
them
without
getting
too
much
into
the
weeds.
There
are
a
lot
of
checks
and
balances
in
place
to
maximize
safety,
and
just
for
the
record,
Nevada
has
not
had
serious
issues
with
that.
C
I
And
thank
you
for
the
question.
I'm
just
I
know:
I
haven't
had
too
many
experiences
on
this
committee,
but
my
question
is:
when
you
say
transfer,
is
that
just
for
the
one-time
thing
or
is
it
for
the
season
or
is
it
your
your
tag
for
life
I'm
trying
to
understand
okay,.
C
No
thank
you
Ira
hands
again
the
way
the
tag
system
works.
You
apply
for
a
tag
and
there
are
seasons
that
are
set
up
by
the
Wildlife
Commission,
for
example,
this
year.
I
think
that
the
the
rifle
mule
deer
season
is
October
5th
through
the
20th
or
something
like
that.
So,
if
you
transferred
in
this
example,
a
a
mule
deer
Buck
tag,
a
rifle
tag
that
your
use
of
that
tag
would
only
be
for
one
season
and
would
be
strictly
limited
to
the
to
the
week
or
two
that
the
Wildlife
Commission
is
set
aside.
C
The
way
it
would
work
I
would
have
an
opportunity
to
apply
Again
The,
Following
Season.
There
would
be
no
way
for
the
most
part.
There
are
some.
C
There
are
some
cases
where
if
they
have
extra
tags
left
over,
you
can
actually
apply
again,
but
that's
almost
unheard
of
now,
so
you
get
one
shot
at
it,
pardon
bad
pun.
You
get
one
opportunity
to
have
a
tag
and
if
I
was
to
transfer
it
there
isn't
in
that
same
season
opportunity
to
me
to
then
apply
for
another
tag.
It's
strictly
a
one
one
season
arrangement.
J
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
My
husband's
a
hunter,
but
it's
been
a
little
while
since,
since
he's
he's
gone
hunting,
but
if
I
remember
properly,
he
and
I
don't
know.
If
this
still
happens,
he
would
have
a
group
together
and
if,
when
they
all
would
put
in
with
for
tags,
if
one
member
of
the
group
got
a
tag,
then
everyone
in
the
group
would
get
a
tag.
So
I
guess.
My
first
question
is:
does
that
still
happen
and
then
my
second
question
is
just
for
clarity.
J
C
To
the
first
part
of
your
question,
yes,
you
are
allowed
to
apply
as
a
group.
Some
people
still
do
that.
The
problem
is
if
one
person,
everybody
gets
a
tag
or
nobody
gets
a
tag.
So
it's
not
like
one
person
in
the
group
can
get
one,
but
in
some
cases
families
like
the
hunter
or
different
groups
of
people
like
to
hunt
and
they'll
apply,
hoping
everybody
gets
one,
that's
kind
of
declined
a
little
bit
because
of
the
the
reduction
in
tag
numbers.
What
was
your
second
part
of
your
question?
I'm,
sorry,.
C
You
Ira
Hance
again.
What
happens
now
is
if,
let's
say
right
now,
I
apply
for
a
tag,
but
for
whatever
reason,
I'm
not
going
to
be
able
to
hunt
in
October.
As
you
know,
something
comes
up.
I
can
turn
that
tag
back
into
the
Department
of
Wildlife.
Currently,
if
I
want,
and
they
actually
have
a
a
waiting
list
of
people
who
are
unsuccessful.
Who,
then
you
know,
there's
literally
a
list.
You
know
there's
like
the
top
10,
if
I
turn
that
tag
back
in
one
of
the
top
10
would
get
that
tag.
C
What
would
typically
happen?
Those
if
I
don't
hunt
I,
just
don't
hunt
and
the
tag
is
not
used,
and-
and
so
you
know-
let's
say-
I
wait
too
long
and
in
September
two
weeks
before
the
hunt
I've
got
to
go
on
some
business
trip
out
of
state
or
something
and
I
miss
that
opportunity.
The
tag
simply
is
not
used.
There's
no
way
to
turn
it
back
in
currently.
J
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
answers,
so
we
had
something
like
this
came
up
last
session
and
in
the
conversation
I
had
with
my
husband.
He
was
a
kind
of
sure
that
he
was
opposed
to
this
bill
because
everyone
puts
in
a
tag
and
has
an
equal
chance
of
getting
a
tag
in
the
situation.
And
if
you
get
a
tag-
and
you
don't
use
it
instead
of
it
going
back
to
other
people
who
are
still
waiting
for
it,
you
bypass
that
whole
system
and
give
it
to
a
chosen
person.
C
Well,
your
husband
has
a
point
and
like,
in
my
case
with
my
family
applies
and
I'm
successful
I
could
give
it
to
one
of
my
grandsons,
for
example.
Currently
that
doesn't
exist,
so
your
husband
does
have
a
point
if
there,
if
this
opportunity
comes
up-
and
there
may
be
some
people
like
me-
honestly
I
will
apply,
and
hopefully,
if
my
grandkids
don't
get
one
or
her
nephew
doesn't
get
one
well,
then
I'll
be
able
to
give
him
that
opportunity
so
because
it
is
a
a
limited
number,
your
husband
is
not
entirely
incorrect.
H
Hatchet,
thank
you
chair,
so
I
have
kind
of
a
two-part
question.
I'll,
let
you
do
the
first
part
and
then
I'll
have
a
follow-up.
The
first
part
is
the
person
you're
transferring
to
do
they
is
they?
Is
there
a
requirement
that
they
had
already
applied
for
a
tag
and
been
denied,
or
can
you
transfer
it
to
someone
who's
not
applied
at
all?
Well,.
C
I
Ira
hanskin,
first
of
all,
they
would
have
to
have
a
hunting
license
and
they
would
have
had
to
pass
hunter
safety
and
get
a
hunter
safety
certificate,
so
they
have
some
level
of
that.
There
is
nothing
yet
remember.
This
is
just
a
they've
got
to
set
up
the
regulations
and
there
may
be
some
regulations
to
try
to
say
well
if
you're
unsuccessful-
and
you
cannot
have
this
transfer.
C
This
may
be
something
to
to
for
people
that
didn't
get
have
an
opportunity
to
do
that
now,
right
now,
just
so
everybody
knows
there
is
in
the
tag
process.
What
is
called
a
youth
hunt
and
a
disproportionate
number
of
tags
go
to
youths
already,
so
there
may
not
be
a
lot
of
this.
You
things
like
two
of
my
grandsons
got
a
tag
and
nobody
else
did,
and
they
were
in
that
youth
category.
As
far
as
how
the
department
a
while
excuse
me,
the
the
wildlife
commissions
structures.
C
This
thing:
that's
probably
one
of
the
questions
that
they
would
address
so
remember
this
is
very
generic
and
Broad.
All
this
is
going
to
do
is
give
them
the
ability
to
set
up
the
regulatory
framework
to
make
this
process
work,
and
undoubtedly
that
will
be
one
of
the
things
that
they
will
need
to
address.
H
C
Very
good
point,
I
would
say:
yes,
I
actually
were
trying
to
get
young
people
involved.
That's
as
some
of
the
woman
bill
by
Oxo
asked.
I
am
definitely
trying
to
give
young
people
an
advantage.
So
in
my
opinion
that
doesn't
mean
that
the
Wildlife
Commission
will
structure
it
that
way,
but
the
whole
intent
of
this
bill
is
to
get
more
young
people
into
these
Sports
guys.
C
Like
me,
at
62,
you
know,
I
might
get
the
tag
and
when
an
opportunity
like
our
15
year
old,
comes
in
and
not
even
necessarily
a
family
member
I
would
love
to
give
them
an
advantage
in
law
and
give
me
the
chance
to
do
it
and
by
the
way
that
was
Rex
flowers,
whole
intent
too.
He
was
definitely
wanting
to
encourage
younger
people
into
the
sport
more
so
yeah.
There
is
an
advantage
now
and
we
may
give
them
a
slightly
greater
advantage,
which
I
hope
the
Wildlife
Commission
will
do.
A
Have
the
people
going
out
when
they're
younger
and
their
parents,
or
their
supervising
and
they're,
as
opposed
to
someone
who's
18
who's,
never
participated
in
the
hunt
before
who
all
of
a
sudden
decides,
I'm
gonna
go
out
and
do
I'm
gonna
go
out
and
hunt
and
they've
haven't
I
mean
they.
They
do
have
the
the
hunter
safety
training
that
we
do
require,
but
they
don't.
You
learn
a
lot
out
in
the
field
and
they're
not
getting
the
Hands-On
training
with
having
a
parent
or
other
close
friend
or
relative
there,
who's
supervising
so,
okay.
K
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Thank
you.
Senator
for
being
here.
I
have
to
tell
you
you
know:
I
have
been
sweating
this
bill,
you're
known
for
bringing
really
controversial
legislation,
so
I'm
really
uncomfortable
all
kidding
aside.
Well,
actually,
do
you
have
concerns
that
the
governor
would
veto
such
such
legislation?
There's
been
rumors
but
in
all
seriousness,
maybe
explain
a
little
bit
how
I
have
viewed
this
is.
This
is
a
mentoring
thing.
K
We
do
this
in
a
lot
of
other
spheres
with
youth
and
I
think
because
we
had
a
situation,
although
that's
not
the
reason
for
the
bill,
we
see
there
our
youth
out
there
that
don't
have
the
opportunities,
because
maybe
they
don't
have
a
dad
who
hunts.
Maybe
they
don't
have
a
dad
Who's
involved
or
a
brother
or
a
sister,
that's
really
into
hunting.
So
there
are
youth
out
there
and
I.
Think
Mr
flowers
understood
that
that
this
is
an
opportunity
to
Mentor
whether
it's
an
actual
family
member
or
not.
K
It's
an
opportunity,
I
know
in
high
school.
You
know
you
had
that
opportunity
with
a
beloved
teacher
of
ours
in
high
school
that
took
you
out
hunting
a
lot
because
your
dad
was
busy
working.
So
could
you
elaborate
a
little
bit
more
about
how
maybe
Mr
flowers?
You
know
his
vision?
C
C
I
know
that
you
guys
really
want
this
bad,
but
no
I,
think
assemblywoman.
Hansen's
point
is
very
better
stated
that
it's
a
mentor
concept.
Okay,
you
know
I
just
use
the
family
example,
because
obviously
we
have
a
very
large
family,
but
for
a
lot
of
for
the
a
lot
of
people
who
have
a
neighbor
kid
who
is
disadvantaged,
underprivileged
doesn't
have
opportunities
to
go
out.
C
You
know,
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
Mentor
kids
like
that
and
they
may
enjoy
hunting
and
fishing
and
things
like
that,
and
they
just
want
to
do
something
positive
with
a
younger
person.
This
would
simply
give
in
a
mentor
State
an
opportunity
to
do
something
like
that
and
they
may
have
an
interest
in
hunting
and
they
apply
for
a
tag
and
then
they've
got
a
kid
down
the
street,
who
expresses
an
interest
and
he's
done
the
hunter
safety
thing,
but
he
doesn't
have
a
father
in
his
life
or
whatever.
C
L
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee,
for
the
record.
My
name
is
Kyle
Davis
today
on
behalf
of
the
Coalition
for
Nevada's
Wildlife.
We
are
here
in
support
of
this
bill.
As
you
have
heard,
in
Senator
Hansen's
testimony
former
member
of
the
wildlife
Coalition
Rex
flowers
was
instrumental
in
working
with
Senator
Hansen
on
bringing
this
concept
forward.
L
I
just
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
why
it's
so
important
that
we
that
we
work
to
to
get
youth
involved
in
hunting
and
fishing
and
really
all
these
outdoor
activities,
a
big
part
of
I
guess
in
two
ways
the
importance
of
wildlife
conservation.
L
One
one
reason
is
the
is
just
the
awareness
that
that
we
find
that
people
that
actually
have
experience
Outdoors
that
are
able
to
participate
in
these
types
of
activities
have
a
greater
appreciation
for
the
importance
of
protecting
wildlife,
habitat
for
the
importance
of
clean
water,
for
the
importance
of
healthy
lands.
And
that's
the
thing
that
you
really
that
you
could
really
gain
an
appreciation
for
when
you
were
out
in
the
field
when
you
are
trying
to
figure
out.
L
Where
are
the
the
animals
out
here
where,
where,
if
I
was,
if
I
was
a
deer,
if
I
was
at
Elk,
where
would
I?
Where
would
I
be
on
this
landscape?
It
really
gives
a
great
appreciation
for
for
Nevada's
environment
and
for
the
importance
of
protecting
these
areas
for
our
Wildlife
species.
L
That
goes
to
they
put
that
money.
Our
state
wildlife
department
puts
that
money
on
the
ground
and
you
know
for
the
protection
of
wildlife
habitat
for
increasing
our
opportunities
for
hunting
and
increasing
our
Wildlife
populations.
So
those
are
just
two
of
the
main
reasons
why
we
think
it's
so
important
to
make
sure
that
we
are
getting
youth
involved
in
hunting,
and
we
think
that
this
bill
is
another
step
that
we
can
take
to
make
sure
that
we're
passing
on
these
Traditions
to
the
Next
Generation
and
passing
on
the
ethic
of
wildlife
conservation.
Thank
you.
A
M
Good
evening,
chair
Cohen
and
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
Matthew
Wilke
w-I-l-k-I-e
for
the
record
and
I'm
calling
in
support
of
Senate
Bill
311..
Many
people
that
know
me
politically
may
be
surprised.
I
grew
up
hunting
and
fishing
in
southern
Oregon
I.
This
bill
brings
me
back
to
a
story
that
my
father
told
me
growing
up:
hunting
opening
day
of
hunting
season
season
1987.
M
my
mother
went
into
early
labor
and
was
forced
to
for
give
birth
to
me,
and
my
dad
always
would
remind
me
how
we
get
being
born
early
prevented,
my
mother
from
using
the
tag
that
year,
so
I
think
that
this
would
be
a
bill
that
would
maybe
prevent
that
from
happening
and
going
forward.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
A
A
Thank
you
so
also
seeing
no
one
in
neutral
well,
no
one
for
neutral,
because
there's
no
one
else
in
the
room
in
Las,
Vegas
or
Carson
City,
just
checking
BPS
anyone
on
the
phone's
in
neutral.
A
There
are
still
no
callers
okay.
So
with
that
Senator
I'd
like
to
come
up
and
make
final
statement,
you
don't
have
to.
C
Have
to
just
say
thank
you
for
the
the
the
hearing
today.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
A
E
Thank
you,
chair
cone,
Nick
Anthony
for
the
record
before
the
committee
this
afternoon
is
the
bill.
You
just
heard:
Senate
Bill
311
and
its
first
reprint
sponsored
by
Senator
Hanson
Titus
gokuccia.
At
all
again
just
heard
Senate
Bill
311
authorizes
the
board
of
wildlife
Commissioners
to
adopt
regulations
to
allow
a
person
to
transfer
his
or
her
tag
to
hunt
a
big
game
mammal
to
any
person
who's
under
18
years
of
age,
and
there
were
no
amendments
manager.
A
D
D
I
am
going
to
vote
this
out
of
committee
I
and
I
and
I'm
probably
gonna
vote
for
it
on
the
floor
as
well,
but
I
do
hope
that
there
aren't
unintended
consequences
like
I
said
so,
but
I
do
trust
the
commission
I
know
they'll.
Do
it
I'm
happy
that
it's
a
may,
not
a
shell,
so
just
wanted
to
put
get
that
on
the
record.
J
Woman
considine,
thank
you,
chair
I,
do
have
concerns
that
this
could
potentially
increase
chances
of
one
person
getting
a
tag
if
there's
a
family
of
hunters
that
really
wants
their
son
to
get
that
tag
and
they
all
put
in
with
no
intention
for
them
using
the
tag.
If
one
of
them
gets
a
tag
for
their
son,
so
I
will
vote
it
out
of
com
out
of
committee,
but
I
just
have
some
concerns
that
I
need
to
think
over,
because
we
just
got
this.
So
thank
you.
Okay.
Thank.
G
I
understand
the
concerns
and
I
think
they're
really
valid.
It's
not
going
to
happen.
Tags
are
so
so
rare
that
if
at
my
age
at
75,
if
I
drive
bull
tag,
I'll
be
damned
if
my
kid's
going
to
shoot
that
ball,
you
know
it
just
it
isn't
gonna
happen,
no
matter
how
old
he
is
or
I
am.
If
I
draw
another
bull
tag
in
the
state
of
Nevada
he's
not
going
to
get
it,
nor
is
my
daughter
or
my
grandsons
or
anybody
else.
G
It's
my
tag
I've
been
putting
in
for
five
years
now
to
get
a
deer
tag
and
of
course,
if
I
never
get
another
tag,
I've
had
enough,
but
but
and
maybe
at
80
I'll,
give
it
a
consideration,
but
not
yet
so
I
think
the
program's,
wonderful
I
think
it
helps
get
rid
of
some
illegality.
That's
out
there
right
now
we
didn't
bring
that
up,
but
it
goes
on
and
I
think
it's
a
great
program.
G
H
A
Macarthur
all
four
statements
go
to
assembly
member
MacArthur.
So,
okay
with
that,
that
brings
our
work
session
to
a
close
and
we
will
go
into
public
comment.
We
have
anyone
for
public
comment
in
Carson
City.
No
one
jump
into
the
table,
seeing
no
one
in
Las
Vegas
BPS.
Do
we
have
anyone
on
the
phone
for
public
comment.
A
Okay,
so
with
that,
we
still
are
scheduled
for
hearings
for
the
rest
of
session
I,
don't
know
if
we're
going
to
get
anything
I
think
it's
likely.
We
will
not
but
just
stay
tuned,
and
let
me
just
check
this
message
to
make
sure
okay
so
anyway,
but
in
case
we
don't
I,
want
to
thank
everyone
for
a
really
great
session,
especially
our
staff
and
today,
especially
Mr
Anthony,
for
filling
in,
but
our
staff.
A
N
Since
this
may
be
our
last
one,
I
wanted
to
specifically
thank
you.
Chair,
you've
run
the
committee
extremely
fairly,
very
well
balanced,
giving
everyone
an
opportunity
to
say
their
piece.
I
really
appreciate
it,
and
it's
been
a
joy
of
serving
with
you.
A
O
And
growth
in
infrastructure
members,
we
need
some
time
to
turn
over
this
room
and
get
ready.
So
maybe
15
20
minutes
we'll
be
right
back
in
here
and
for
those
of
you
that
also
serve
on
natural
resources.
You're
going
to
get
a
double
dose
of
Senator
Hansen
today.