►
Description
This is the first meeting of the 2019-2020 Interim. Please see agenda for details.
For agenda and additional meeting information:https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
A
All
right,
I
think
that
we
are
ready
to
go.
Let's.
A
Obviously,
let's
start
off
with
a
roll
call
before
we
get
started,
ms
jones,
if
you
could,
please
call.
B
A
I
am
here,
thank
you
and
miss
jones.
I
I
well
normally
we
would
say
mark
from
prison
as
they
arrive,
but
we'll
all
know,
and
so
we
will
continue
on
and
acknowledge
them
when
they
do
arrive.
A
Just
some
brief
over
remarks
before
we
get
started
before
we
go
on
the
public
comment,
this
is,
of
course,
our
first
meeting
the
subcommittee
to
review
and
advise
on
the
coronavirus
federal
aid
we
established
this
subcommittee
on
may
the
20th
may
the
21st
and
the
plan
for
this
meeting
today
is
to
hear
a
high
level
overview
of
where
we
are
and
and
then,
of
course,
where
we
plan
on
going
in
response
to
the
coronavirus,
we're
gonna
hear
information
about
the
distribution
expenditure
and
proposals
on
the
plan
planned
use
of
corona
virus
relief
funds.
A
I
do
plan
on
holding
additional
meetings
and
we
will
have
additional
areas
of
face
this,
but
this
first
one
again
is
intended
to
be
an
overview.
I
I
want
to
stress,
and
I've
talked
to
members
for
obviously
there's
a
lot
of
information.
We
have
a
lot
of
questions,
but
this
this
meeting
is
the
what
not
necessarily
the
why
this
is.
A
You
know
where
we
are
and
what
we
have
and
what's
left
and
we'll
have
subsequent
opportunities
to
get
into
the
weeds
on
some
of
the
questions
that
we
may
have
about
why
decisions
were
made,
and
I'm
sure
there'll
be
a
couple,
but
but
I'd
like
to
stick
with
this
first
meeting
to
adjust
that
to
the
what
and
not
necessarily
why
yet
and
observe
that
when
we
have
more
of
the
involved
parties
like
local
government
and
higher
ed
other
partners,
that
would
be
able
to
make
their
presentation
and
then
answer
questions.
A
There's
a
presentation
that
was
provided
to
members
as
posted
on
our
website
yesterday.
So
it's
available
to
the
public
additional.
A
A
I
want
to
thank
the
governor
and
the
governor's
office,
for
I
think
their
interests
that
we
share
in
transparency
and
wanting
to
be
able
to
provide
information
both
to
our
body,
but
also
to
the
public,
about
the
the
assistance
that
we've
received
and
what
it's
been
spent
on
and
what
our
intentions
are
moving
forward
by
the
end
of
the
year
and
provide
a
venue
for
recommendations
moving
forward
with
whatever
may
be
remaining
recognizing
that
we
also
need
to
be
prepared
for
anything
that
might
happen
by
between
now
and
the
end
of
the
year
and
before
we
further
go
on
a
public
comment.
A
I
also
wanted
to
just
on
the
record,
take
just
a
moment
to
acknowledge
that
today
is
the
19th
anniversary
of
the
911
attacks,
and
I
was
reminded
as
soon
as
I
woke
up
this
morning
and
turned
on
the
news
of
you
know.
It
seems
like
it
was
just
yesterday
and
we
still
are
feeling
of
the
effects
of
that
and-
and
I
think
that's
related
to
to
that,
as
well
as
changes
and
how
we
live
and
govern.
A
And
so
I
want
to
acknowledge
that
19th
anniversary
is
a
solid
reminder
of
you
know
how
far
we've
come
and
you
know
how
blessed
we
are
and
so
that
I
will
move
on
to
public
comment
and
it's
published
on
the
agenda
and
it
can
be
made
by
mail
by
fax
or
calling
in
the
number
is
669-900-6833
and
their
directions
for
participating.
A
We
will
limit
public
comment
as
typical
to
two
minutes
per
speaker
and
I
will
take
up
to
a
total
of
45
minutes
for
public
comment
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting
and
then,
of
course,
at
the
end
of
the
meeting,
there'll
be
another
opportunity
for
public
comment
as
reflected
on
the
agenda
and
just
so
those
who
haven't
done
this
before
and
the
public
know
we
have
broadcast
staff,
so
our
broadcast
and
production
staff
are
going
to
be
interacting
with
folks
making
public
comment,
providing
testimony
and
facilitating
that
participation,
and
so
with
that,
if
staff
we
can
queue
up
folks
and
add
the
first
caller.
C
D
Okay,
thank
you
good
morning,
chairman
friarson
and
members
of
the
subcommittee
joanna
jacob
j,
o
a
n
n,
a
j,
a
it
and
cat
o,
as
in
oh
b,
isn't
boy.
I
am
government
affairs
manager
for
clark
county.
We
are
offering
some
comments
this
morning
on
behalf
of
southern
nevada,
who
has
been
particularly
hard
hit
by
covid19
in
the
initial
days
of
the
pandemic.
D
We
know
that
many
of
you
know
we
will
never
forget
the
eerie
sight
of
the
strip
of
shutdown
and
what
that
means
to
the
people
who
work
in
our
hospitality
industry
and
throughout
our
region.
Our
comments
today
focus
on
the
secondary
crisis.
The
fear
is
looming,
the
risk
to
housing
stability,
while
benefits
are
delayed
and
unemployment
persists,
and
this
is
a
concern
for
our
clark,
county
leaders,
our
staff
and
our
municipal
partners.
We've
offered
a
letter
of
chairman
person
and
members
that
we
filed
yesterday,
so
I
have
that
in
the
record.
D
D
But
we
know
this
funding
is
woefully
inadequate
to
meet
the
needs
in
the
months
ahead
and
we
can
estimate
that
we
can
only
assist
about
14
000
households
at
our
current
funding
levels,
75
percent
of
the
state
population
and
the
highest
number
of
renters
statewide.
We
fear
we
cannot
meet
this
need.
The
wind
center
is
estimating
up
to
142
000
households,
households
statewide
could
be
at
risk
of
eviction
and
to
meet
the
needs
of
even
half
of
that
amount.
D
With
the
three
months
months
of
assistance
that
we
have
in
place
today,
the
funding
needed
is
estimated
to
be
about
212
million
dollars,
of
which
clark
county's,
proportionate
share
based
on
our
population
would
amount
to
159
million
dollars,
and
this
is
a
staggering
amount.
We
know
we.
We
know
that
it's
staggering
and,
as
you
go
about
the
work
of
this
committee
and
you
review
allocation
of
funding,
we're
asking
for
your
help
to
expand
rental
and
housing
assistance
in
any
way
to
southern
nevada.
D
It's
critical
to
the
health
of
our
community
that
we
help
as
many
as
we
can
to
stay
safely
in
their
homes.
We
have
further
comments.
We
link
to
the
quinn
center
study
in
our
letter.
Thank
you
for
your
review
and
this
request
is
joined
by
our
municipal
partners,
boulder
city,
henderson,
las
vegas,
mesquite
and
north
las
vegas.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
C
C
E
C
C
B
B
B:
c-h-r-I-s-t-o-p-h-e-r-b-o
y
d
government
affairs
specialist
for
the
city
of
henderson
since
the
start
of
this
pandemic,
the
city
of
henderson
has
collaborated
with
clark
county
and
our
neighboring
cities
of
las
vegas,
north
las
vegas,
boulder
city
and
mesquite
to
respond
to
the
public
health
emergency
and
address
the
severe
financial
strain
that
is
placed
on
families
and
businesses
in
our
community
as
well
as
noted
by
the
county.
The
gwen
center
study
showed
that
as
many
as
249
700
clark,
county
residents
could
eventually
be
at
risk
of
eviction
or
foreclosure.
B
C
F
F
The
city
of
boulder
city,
like
many
communities
in
southern
nevada,
has
residents
facing
challenging
financial
times
due
to
the
economic
effects
of
the
pandemic.
Providing
some
measure
of
relief
for
those
affected
economically
is
a
pressing
public
policy
matter.
The
city
supports
endeavors,
to
secure
funding
for
residential
rental,
and
mortgage
relief.
F
C
D
D
Unfortunately,
southern
nevada
has
had
to
fight
for
our
fair
share
of
federal
relief
dollars
and
we
continue
fighting
according
to
the
very
clear
u.s
treasury
treasury
regulations.
Cities
in
southern
nevada,
with
population
under
500
000,
should
have
received
a
combined
104.2
million
dollars
in
cares.
Act
funding,
fortunately,
clark
county,
recognized
this
obvious
and
glaring
unequal
treatment
and
took
some
of
the
federal
monies
allocated
to
them
for
regional
services
and
gave
them
to
local
governments.
D
Helping
our
residents
and
businesses
avoid
eviction
will
be
one
of
the
most
pressing
needs
and
we
support
a
regional
approach
led
blight,
led
by
clark
county
to
assist
our
community
that's
being
destroyed
by
the
pandemic.
In
light
of
the
data
contained
in
the
glen
central
study
that
predicts
upwards
of
1.1
billion
dollars.
In
addiction,
prevention
needs
statewide,
the
city
joins
clark,
county
and
requesting
159
million
dollars
for
regional
mortgage
and
rent
relief
for
southern
nevada
residents.
D
Southern
nevada
has
been
devastated
by
the
pandemic
as
an
epicenter
for
over
80
percent
of
our
state's
covert
cases,
as
well
as
the
vast
majority
of
fatalities.
At
one
point,
our
minority
majority
city
led
the
nation's
highest
covet
mortality
rate
66
among
african-american
communities
and
record
unemployment.
D
North
las
vegas
residents
have
just
been
disproportionately
affected
by
this
pandemic
and
it's
accompanying
economic
during
town
downturn.
There
seldom
a
more
sobering
example
of
divide
between
the
have
and
have
not
than
what
the
residents
of
north
las
vegas
are
currently
experiencing
and
how
they
were
treated
as
federal
funds
were
allocated.
D
As
you
review
the
remaining
resources,
I
urge
this
committee
to
award
funds
to
southern
nevada,
the
region
most
affected
by
the
coronavirus
epidemic
and
the
region
that
has
unjustly
received
less
per-person
funding
than
the
rest
of
the
state.
I
also
ask
you
to
consider
supporting
communities
in
the
south
equally
to
communities
in
the
north.
I
implore
the
governor
and
this
committee
to
act
swiftly
and
award
clark.
D
County
and
southern
nevada
cities
originally
excluded
their
rightful
disbursement
of
care
tax
dollars
so
that
we
have
a
chance
to
keep
the
families
most
impacted,
safe,
healthy
and
in
their
home.
Our
north
las
vegas
mayor
and
city
council
recently
adopted
a
resolution
standing
in
solidarity
with
you
and
the
governor
defining
racism
as
a
public
health
crisis.
D
I
ask
now
that
this
committee
and
the
governor
stand
with
the
residents
of
north
las
vegas
in
the
fight
against
systemic
racism,
as
they
struggle
to
keep
a
roof
over
families
head
and
food
on
the
table.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
consideration
and
for
all
your
hard
work
in
helping
our
residents
survive
these
trying
times.
A
Thank
you
and
the
comments
that
were
received
are
all
do
we
noted,
some
of
which
I
believe
will
be
addressed
today
and
some
of
which,
in
subsequent
meetings,
and
so
with
that,
I
will
move
on
to
item
four
on
today's
agenda
and
that's
an
overview
of
the
coronavirus,
federal
aid
received
by
the
state
of
nevada
and
again
for
the
public
certification,
we're
talking
about
the
state
and
there's
several
other
entities,
nonprofits
community
organizations
and
local
government
that
have
also
received
funds
directly
today,
we're
talking
about
managing
what
the
state
has
received
and
how
the
state
has
and
plans
on
using
the
remainder
of
those
funds,
and
so
with
that,
I
believe
we
have
our
our
treasurer
zac
zach
and
I
and
miss
jones
is
it?
A
B
A
E
A
F
F
F
F
We,
we
have
experienced
a
little
bit
of
a
puzzle
when
it
comes
to
the
funding,
because
the
receipt
of
this
federal
funding
has
been
a
bit
like
opening
up
a
box
with
a
bunch
of
puzzle
pieces.
There
were
multiple
bills
that
came
in
multiple
funding
mechanisms,
multiple
types
of
recipients
which
meant
it
didn't
come
in
as
one
big
comprehensive
package.
It
actually
came
in
as
pieces
that
we
have
been
diligently
putting
together.
F
We're
actually
not
going
to
be
speaking
about
the
trillions
of
dollars,
because
that
was
what
came
in
for
all
of
the
states,
but
instead,
what
we're
going
to
focus
on
is
what
nevada
received,
which
we
currently
estimate
at
19
billion
as
of
september
2nd
of
2020.
Again,
this
is
the
data
we're
using
so
first
off
the
very
first
bill.
We're
going
to
cover
or
just
go
over.
Very
briefly
was
the
coronavirus,
preparedness
and
response.
F
Supplemental
appropriations
act
2020..
This
was
passed
on
march,
6th
of
2020
and
to
date
approximately
eight
million
dollars
has
come
into
nevada,
mostly
aimed
at
public
health
and
medical
response.
That
was
our
first
bill
that
came
in.
F
We
then,
after
that,
had
a
second
act
that
passed,
which
was
the
family's
first
coronavirus
response
act
with
this
act.
Approximately
373
million
dollars
has
been
received
in
nevada
and
most
of
this
funding,
centers
on
paid,
sick
and
family
leave,
free
corona
virus
testing,
expansion
of
unemployment
benefits,
food
assistance
and
additional
protection
for
frontline
health
workers.
That's
mostly
what
that
covered
and
again
that
was
on
march
18th
that
that
came
in.
F
So
we
had
a
third
act
that
passed
shortly
after
that,
and
this
was
the
big
one.
This
was
the
coronavirus
aid
relief
and
economic
security
act
or
cares
act,
and
we
are
all
very
familiar
with
this.
One
nevada
has
received
approximately
15.6
billion
dollars
from
the
cares
act
with
the
largest
amount
of
aid
going
to
the
paycheck
protection
program,
which
issued
forgivable
loans
to
small
businesses.
F
The
cares
act
also
provided
aid
to
businesses
very
directly
to
businesses,
healthcare
farmers.
We
had
some
going
to
airports
and
transit
agencies
as
well
care
funds
also
went
to
the
states
and
local
governments
and
included
major
packages
for
education
and
child
care.
As
well,
and
two
of
the
biggest
allocations
of
this
act
were
the
cash
payments
to
individuals
and
increased
unemployment
benefits,
we're
all
familiar
with
the
checks
that
were
issued
by
the
treasury
to
citizens,
and
that
was
a
a
major
part
of
this
act.
F
We
are
going
to
go
ahead
and
take
a
look
at
the
the
fourth
bill
or
the
fourth
act
that
was
passed
next,
and
this
last
piece
of
legislation
that
came
out
was
the
paycheck
protection
program
and
health
care
enhancement
act.
So
nevada
has
received
approximately
92
million
of
these
funds
since
its
passage
in
april.
F
F
F
F
F
A
big
portion
of
this
is
from
the
economic
injury
disaster
loans,
which
were
funded
by
both
the
coronavirus,
preparedness
and
response
act,
but
it
was
also
funded
by
the
paycheck
protection
program.
So
again,
this
this
is
just
a
slice
that
that
represents
some
of
these
bills
or
some
of
these
programs
that
were
funded
through
most
multiple
acts,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure
and
point
that
out
there.
But
the
main
thing
here
that
you
can
see
is
that
the
biggest
piece
of
the
pie
actually
lies
with
the
cares
act.
F
A
Members
this
is,
you
know,
I
I
suspect
it's
gonna
get
thicker
as
we
go.
So
if,
if
members
have
questions
now,
let
me
know
or
if
folks
want
to
wait,
not
as
technologically
savvy.
So
let
me
see.
C
I
have
a
question,
mr
chair.
Thank
you.
Can
we
go
back
so
if
we're
looking
at
the
presentation,
there's
the
slide.
That
indicated
how
much
money
we
got
directly
through
the
cares
act
bill
and
then
we
got
to
the
19
billion
figure
and
I
didn't
write
down
the
exact
figure
from
all
of
the
different
pieces
of
federal
legislation,
but
it
didn't
seem
they
added
up
to
19
billion,
which
is
almost
two
and
a
half
times
our
annual
state
budget.
Can
you
walk
us
through
how
you
came
up
with
that
figure.
F
Bills
so
leslie
mullin
camp
for
the
record
I'll
go
ahead
and
put
the
slide
back
up
so
that
we
can
speak
to
it.
I
I
do
believe
that
director
brown
will
be
commenting
on
this
as
well,
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
get
that
situated.
So
we
can
take
a
look
at
it.
C
F
Leslie
mullin
counts
for
the
record
and
again
director
brown
may
comment
on
this
as
well.
I
do
believe
that
the
further
we
go
down
the
presentation-
you
might
get
a
little
bit
more
clarity
on
that,
because
we
will
be
looking
specifically
at
the
cares
portion
of
that,
and
then
we
will
also
be
looking
at
the
amount
that
has
directly
come
in
through
work
program.
So
some
of
that
clarification
might
might
come
through
the
presentation.
A
If
I
could
interject
a
little
bit
so
we
have
we
not
gone
through,
I
think
she's.
Just
considering.
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
her,
but
you
know
just
generally
what
adds
up
to
19.
I
have
some
notes,
and
I
think
a
large
chunk
of
that
is
specifically
cares
dollars.
A
I
think
over
15
billion
is
his
cares
dollars
alone,
and
then
I
I
senator,
are
you
just
I'm
looking
at
my
notes
to
say,
there's
about
15.6
billion
there's
dollars
and
then
there's
the
other
ones
that
are
obviously
smaller
amounts.
But
are
you
saying
that
those
smaller
amounts
don't
add
up
to
19
billion?
I
think
it's
close
with
those,
I
think,
there's
eight
million
373
million
and
then
92
million
outside
of
the
cares
dollars
that
I
think.
C
I
didn't
write
it
down
correctly,
but
I
thought
on
the
first
in
the
first
purple
bucket,
where
it
outlined
the
character
act
allocation
to
nevada.
I
thought
it
was
much
less
than
15
billion,
but
maybe
I
just
wrote
it
down
correctly,
so
we
could
just
go
back
to
that
slide.
To
make
sure
that
I
have
my
notes.
Correct
that'd
be
helpful.
F
And
we
should
be-
I
I
believe
this
is
probably
where
you're
you're
speaking
to
we
had
the
8
million.
F
C
I
I
miss,
I
didn't
write
down
numbers
correctly,
so
thank
you
for
going
on
this
journey
with
me
to
catch
me
up.
I
apologize
for
not
keeping
up
the
way
I
should
have
so.
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you,
and
thanks
for
this
presentation,
thanks
for
the
the
slides
and
for
posting
those
for
the
public
as
well,
because
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
interest
across
the
state
on
how
those
funds
are
being
allocated
and
just
how
to
track
what's
been
allocated
so
far.
And
then,
where
we're
going
to
put
the
remaining
dollars.
C
Is
there
one
specific
website
that
we
could
direct
the
public
to
our
constituents
to
to
be
able
to
check
in
in
real
time
on
a
regular
basis
for
these
updates,
and
I
noticed
on
slide
19,
for
example,
that
you
point
out
that
we
have
91
different
programs
that
these
cares
act
dollars
are
going
to.
And
so
I'm
just
wondering
if
we
have
that
resource
available
for
the
public.
F
And
leslie
mullen
camp
for
the
record.
Yes,
we
do.
Actually
we
have
our
grant
office
who
has
put
in
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
in
putting
all
these
pieces
together,
because
again
it
has.
It
has
been
quite
a
puzzle
to
to
put
together
the
the
grant
office
website
is
grant.nv.gov
and
they
have
a
a
link
right
on
that
main
page.
That
is
covet
19
funding
and
there
are
reports
that
are
presented
there
that
are
updated.
F
I
can
say
that
again,
you
know
we
can't
emphasize
enough
that
this
has
been
very
much
putting
pieces
together
because
of
the
various
ways
this
funding
has
come
into
the
state.
So
this
as
we
go
further
along
and
week
after
week,
we
we
do
find
and
are
able
to
collect
more
and
more
information,
so
our
reporting
becomes
more
and
more
refined
over
the
weeks,
and
I
do
want
to
make
sure
to
point
that
out,
but
the
grant
office
grant.nv.gov
does
a
weekly,
updated
report
that
includes
all
of
this
information
you're.
Seeing
here.
C
Number
nine,
where
we
have
the
breakdown
of
the
federal
funding
by
category.
I
just
had
a
quick
question,
because
I
wonder
if
we're
going
to
go
into
these
buckets
in
more
detail,
because
I'm
showing
that
the
funding's
showing
in
thousands
and
so
my
question
is
like
for
the
rental
assistance
that
was
awarded
out.
I
think
I'm
assuming
that's
being
counted
under
economic
relief
instead
of
housing,
because
this
is
this
is
indicating
that
we've
only
spent
76
000
in
housing.
C
F
Leslie
mullen
camp
for
the
record.
Yes,
we
will
be
going
into
a
little
bit
more
detail
as
we
get
into
the
presentation.
One
of
the
reasons
why
I
I'd
like
to
point
that
out
is
that
that
amount
that
19
billion
amount,
15.6
billion
of
that
is
actually
very
specific.
F
To
cares
act
and,
as
we
continue
on
in
the
presentation,
we'll
be
actually
breaking
that
down
a
little
bit
further
and
and
taking
a
closer
look
at
that
cares
act
amount
and
again
that's
that's
that
the
majority
of
the
of
the
funding
we've
received.
So
I
do
believe
that
you're
probably
going
to
see
a
little
bit
more
details
that
would
help
with
those.
C
B
Mr
speaker,
senator
gorkachia,
I
and
I
assume
I'll
just
give
it
some
time
and
we
need
to
get
through
the
process,
but
yeah
and
again
I
look
at
some
of
these.
You
know
industries
that
have
been
assisted
by
the
karzai
funding.
Are
we
going
to
walk
into
how
they
would
in
fact,
access
access?
B
Those
programs,
because
I
think
in
a
lot
of
areas,
even
in
the
rural,
especially
in
the
world
they're,
just
unaware
of
that
this
money
is
available
and
and
or
and
I'm
sure
it's
the
same
in
the
urban
areas,
how
they
access
it.
You
know
everybody's
focused
on
dieter,
but
I'm
assuming
not
all
this
is
19
billion
dollars
is
going
to
go
through
neither,
but
I
guess
we'll
wait
for
mr
brown.
F
Leslie
bowen
cam
for
the
record.
Yes,
we
we
will
be
going
through
a
little
bit
more,
which
programs,
those
are
and
again
you
know,
as
pointed
out
earlier,
our
our
grant
office
is
providing
a
really
great
summary,
so
we
know
where
those
programs
are,
but
today
we
are
covering
it
at
a
pretty
high
level
overview.
So
we
we
actually
won't
be
necessarily
covering
how
you
know
citizens
can
get
access
to
these
programs,
but
certainly
that
could
be
a
really
great
follow-up
for
us.
F
A
Senator,
if
I
may,
I
do
intend
on
having
a
separate
meeting
and
I
think
a
lot
of
the
communication
and
outreach
and
information
is
provided
locally
and
I
do
intend
on
having
local
government,
come
before
the
committee
to
talk
about
their
process.
What
they've
done,
what
they're
doing
and
their
plans
on
making
requests
and
what?
What
they've
already
received,
as
well
as
providing
a
forum
through
the
subcommittee
for
recommendations
and
and
another
note,
and
I
will
say
it.
A
I
guess
at
the
end
of
the
meeting-
and
I
can
say
it
now-
is
after
this
meeting
I'm
going
to
also
be
asking
that
members
of
this
committee
provide
suggestions
and
requests
about
some
of
these
questions
and
some
of
the
areas
that
need
to
be
covered
in
subsequent
meetings.
So
just
know
that
that
I
will
be
canvassing
everybody
on
the
subcommittee
about
their
thoughts
on
future
meetings
and
topics
and
stakeholders
that
you
do.
A
All
right,
if
there
are,
if
there
are
no
other
questions
at
this
point,
if
we
can
move
forward
and
and
and
I
some
of
the
stuff,
I
see,
there's
some
work
programs
and
other
things
that
are
described.
But
again.
A
This
is
a
lot
of
information
and
it's
a
high
level
presentation
can
move
forward
and
some
of
those
questions
may
be
answered,
and
I
suspect
that
we'll
have
more
questions
that
we
generate
after
we
go
as
we
go
through
the
presentation
that
we
can
certainly
set
up
for
future
meetings
to
make
sure
we
have
the
right
people
here
to
provide
that
information.
A
So
I
I
don't
know
if
ms
brown
was
going
to
be
up
next
or
or
on
this
moment,
want
to
continue
to
the
next
part
of
the
presentation.
F
Leslie
mullen
cam
for
the
record.
Yes,
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
continue
on
with
the
presentation
and
then
I'll
be
handing
it
over
to
director
brown
shortly.
So
we'll
go
ahead
and.
F
A
Great
and
I
realize
that
the
presentation
includes
everything,
and
so
members
obviously
don't
feel
restrained
to
not
be
able
to
ask
questions
that
relate
back
as
things
come
up,
because
it's
one
big
presentation,
so
we
can
move
forward.
F
Okay,
I
believe
everybody
should
be
able
to
see
the
screen
again.
So
our
next
area
that
we're
going
to
cover
in
the
pre
presentation
is
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
take
a
look
at
the
cares
act
dollars
in
nevada,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
click
into
that
part
right
there.
F
The
cares
act
dollars
make
up
an
estimated
of
15.6
billion
dollars
of
the
19
estimated
19
billion.
That
nevada
has
received
in
total
covet
19
federal
funding.
F
And
for
a
little
bit
of
background
perspective
again,
this
is
83
percent
of
the
total
funding
that
we've
estimated
nevada
has
received.
F
We've
highlighted
here
that
more
than
6.8
billion
of
the
cares
act,
funds
have
gone
directly
to
entities
within
nevada
and
this
number
was
specifically
called
out
because
it
represents
the
amounts
of
the
paycheck
protection
program
and
the
economic
impact
aids
individuals,
which
were
direct
payments
to
individuals
and
small
businesses.
So
again,
this
number
represents
those
two
amounts
or
those
two
figures
right
there,
but
the
state
was
not
involved
with
this
direct
funding.
It
went
straight
out
to
the
businesses
and
straight
out
to
the
citizens.
F
However,
we
do
believe
that
this
number
could
be
as
big
or
as
high
as
9.7
billion
when
you
take
all
of
the
direct
payments
from
various
programs
into
consideration
and
right
here.
We've
also
highlighted
that
so
far
we
have
tracked
91
programs
that
are
funded
by
the
cares
act,
and
this
can
be
very
confusing
when
someone
refers
generally
to
the
funding.
As
the
cares
act
fund,
because
we
have
91
different
programs
that
are
funded
by
the
cares
act.
F
F
F
F
We
are
all
working
with
a
wide
range
of
federal
partners
to
carry
out
the
various
programs,
grants
and
federal
assistance,
and
you
can
see
some
of
these
listed
here
again.
We
have
the
acronyms
here,
but
these
are
our
federal
partners
that
we're
working
with
to
manage
the
funds.
Each
of
these
federal
partners
is
responsible
for
their
own
programs
and
there
is
no
single
federal
resource
available
where
you
can
find
this
information
collected
in
one
spot.
F
So
all
of
these
26
programs
vary
in
their
duration
or
their
performance
period,
as
well
as
their
uses,
and
we
are
finding
that
several
programs
even
have
the
same
allowances
so
deciding
what
to
fund
first
or
what
fun
to
use
first
is
paramount
when
we're
making
decisions.
F
So
let's
this
is
obviously
just
an
overview.
So
let's
take
a
look
at
those
specific
work
programs
that
have
occurred
so
far
here
you
can
see
all
of
the
work
programs
previously
approved
by
the
interim
finance
committee
that
brought
covet
19
funding
into
the
state's
bank
account.
F
Give
you
a
second
to
to
take
a
look
at
here.
You
can
see
all
the
various
ones.
Of
course
you
guys
you're
all
familiar
with
with
that,
but
you
can
see
that
the
largest
amount
on
this
list-
and
it's
in
the
upper
left
hand
corner-
is
the
coronavirus
relief
fund
at
836
million
dollars.
F
F
F
Local
governments
with
populations
over
500
000
could
elect
to
receive
their
payments.
Their
portion
of
the
payment
directly
from
the
treasury
and
clark
county
and
the
city
of
las
vegas
have
higher
populations
that
meet
the
threshold,
so
they
were
eligible
and
they
chose
to
take
their
portion
of
the
funds
directly.
On
behalf
of
their
populations,
the
state
of
nevada
received
the
rest
of
the
funds,
the
836
million
on
april
28
2020.
F
F
F
The
city
of
las
vegas
received
118.9
million
directly
from
the
treasury,
and
then
the
local
governments
outside
of
clark
county
were
allocated
with
a
total
of
148
million
and,
of
course,
as
mentioned
before,
we
we
have
provided
a
breakdown
of
how
the
local
governments
have
planned
to
use
these
funds
so
that
you
have
that
available.
F
First
of
all,
the
expenditures
must
be
necessary
due
to
the
cobit
19
public
health
emergency
and
because
it
has
to
be
very
directly
related,
this
rules
out
using
any
indirect
costs
so
for
anyone,
who's
managed
grants
before
this
can
often
be
a
normal
use
of
it.
This
does
roll
out
using
indirect
costs.
F
The
other
thing
is
as
far
as
it
being
necessary
due
to
the
the
covet
19
public
health
emergency.
F
Our
second
role
on
the
use
of
the
fund
is,
it
must
not
be
accounted
for
in
the
fiscal
year
2021
budget.
However,
if
there
is
a
budgeted
service
that
changed
substantially
and
very
directly
because
of
the
pandemic,
it
it
is
eligible
or
that
eligible
cost
can
be
covered.
So
that
is
a
a
caveat
right
there.
The
the
third
rule
is
that
it
must
be
incurred
between
march
1st
of
2020
and
december
30th
of
2020
this
cost.
F
F
So
the
treasury
provides
additional
guidance
on
the
use
of
the
funds,
because
those
are
the
three
main
rules,
but
they
have
additional
guidance
that
they've
been
providing
to
on
the
allowance
and
eligible
uses
of
the
funds.
So
there's
two
two
main
documents
that
they've
been
updating.
One
is
a
guidance
document
and
the
second
one
is
a
frequently
asked
questions
or
faqs
in
the
last
four
months,
the
guidance
documents,
the
faqs
and
any
kind
of
guidance
related
to
reporting
requirements.
F
To
summarize,
the
many
updates
that
we've
had
on
the
guidance
and
the
faqs,
and
as
you
can
see
here,
it
is
a
challenge
to
stay
on
top
of
the
changes,
but
it
also
provides
a
very
big
challenge
in
making
decisions
on
funding.
One
good
example
of
this
is
on
recent
fema
allowances
and
unemployment
allowances
that
have
happened
in
the
last
well
a
few
weeks.
F
These
are
very
large
expenses
and
we
would
normally
budget
with
these
in
mind
first
and
then
allocate
remaining
dollars,
but
instead
it
has
been
the
other
way
around.
So
there's
often
this
start
stop
is
part
of
the
allocation
process
because
of
these
continual
updates
that
we've
been
experiencing
and
director
brown
is
going
to
speak
to
this
momentarily.
Just
to
give
you
some
examples
of
the
impact,
these
changes
have
hat
on
any
kind
of
allocation
decisions.
E
E
So
we
swapped
6.2
million
dollars
in
disaster
relief,
account
funds
with
the
coronavirus
relief
funds,
so
that
was
one
and
then
another
has
been
with
fema,
as
well
with
the
national
guard
that
was
funded
100
by
our
federal
partners
through
july
31st,
and
then
guidance
came
out
that
they
would
no
longer
fund
that
with
the
fema
funds
and
we
were
going
to
have
to
use
coronavirus
relief
funds.
E
We
were
informed
yesterday
that
we
can
use
25
percent
of
of
the
funds
the
coronavirus
really
funds
to
match
those
federal
dollars
for
the
balance
of
the
fiscal
year.
So
you
will
be
seeing
a
work.
The
interim
finance
committee
will
be
seeing
a
work
program
soon
on
that
seven
million
dollars.
That
is
anticipated
to
be
needed
to
continue
the
use
of
the
national
guard
through
the
end
of
the
calendar.
E
F
A
Presentation
all
right
members
agenda
number
six
talks
about
proposals
moving
forward.
A
A
B
Is
within
the
guidance
or
within
the
act
itself
that
allocated
the
funds?
What
are
the
penalties
for
us
misusing
these
funds
or
using
them
outside
of
of
the
guidance
and
and
who
makes
that
determination
and
is
it?
Is
there
a
hard
and
hard
and
fast
line,
or
is
there
some
subjectivity.
F
Leslie
mullenkamp
for
the
record,
the
inspector
general
of
the
treasury
is
the
entity
that
is
responsible
for
the
monitoring
of
the
the
fund
use
and
the
penalty,
essentially
on
misuse
of
funds
would
be
that
if
the
treasury
finds
that
it
has
not
been
used
according
to
the
guidance
and
what
has
been
deemed
eligible
uses,
the
treasury
will
come
back
and
collect
that
from
the
prime
recipient,
and
so
the
prime
recipient,
in
this
case,
for
the
836
million
dollars
would
be
the
state.
F
So
if
the
state
allocates
to,
as
we
allocated
the
148
million
to
our
local
government
entities,
if
they
misuse
the
funds,
the
state
will
be
on
the
hook
for
paying
that
back
now
we
have
put
in
agreements
with
the
local
governments
that
should
anything
like
that
be
deemed
or
or
indicated.
F
Let's
lean
on
camp
for
the
record.
Yes,
that
is
correct,
that
if
we
were
to
use
it
inappropriately
according
to
what
the
guidance
was
given,
that
it
would
have
collected
the
treasury
as
since
it
wasn't
used
according
to
eligibility.
A
Thank
you
senator
for
bringing
that
up
and
recognizing
that
the
rule
has
changed
so
many
times.
Could
you
tell
me
if
the
rules
thus
far
have
changed
in
a
meaningfully
retroactive
way?
Like
you
know,
we
got
it,
it
was
they
we
use
it
a
certain
way.
They
changed
the
rules
to
narrow
it
to
where
now
we're
out
of
compliance.
Has
that
happened
in
in
the
past
120
days
and
is
there
a
concern
about
that
moving
forward.
F
F
Other
50
states
pretty
much
got
off
the
gate
and
started
allocating
funds
right
away
to
their
local
governments
and
then
found
out
later
that
there
was
a
major
requirement.
A
major
adjustment
in
that
guidance.
F
To
go
back
and
figure
out
what
that
meant,
I
I
can
say-
and
I
probably
will
turn
it
over
to
director
brown
as
well,
if
she
had
any
other
examples.
Certainly
this
is
something
we're
concerned
about
on
a
regular
basis.
F
A
Thank
you
before
before
we
move
on
with
miss
brown.
This
agreement
with
local
government
was
was
that
agreement
that
if
there
was
a
requirement
to
pay
it
back,
that
they
paid
back,
was
that
required
within
the
cares
act
or
or
by
the
federal
government,
or
was
that
something
that
we
implemented?
I'm
glad
that
we
did
it,
I'm
I'm
I'm
just
curious
as
to
whether
that
was
required,
or
if
that
was
something
we
did
out
of
an
abundance
of
caution.
F
F
However,
that
was
a
pretty
standard
approach
we
saw
with
the
rest
of
the
states,
in
that
we
we
did
have
to
put
some
mechanisms
in
place
should
because
we
were
not
really
directly
involved
in
in
how
those
funds
were
being
used
on
a
day-to-day
basis,
so
that
mechanism
definitely
was
a
a
cautionary
mechanism
that
was
put
in
place
to
ensure
you
know
that
that,
if
should
the
state
be
on
the
hook
for
a
misuse
that
was
in
the
local
government
spectrum
that
we
would
have
a
mechanism
to
collect
it
from
that
local
government.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
and
and
also
the
senator
point.
I
am
aware
of
speaking
leaders
of
our
face
that
other
places
that
have
made
been
a
little
less
disciplined
in
their
use
at
community,
especially
also
and
reserves
already
in
case
they
had,
because
I
saw
some
masks
of
my
issues.
Okay,.
C
And
several
headaches
they
haven't
moved
aside.
C
C
C
Okay,
thank
you
and
then
my
other
question
is
on
page
32,
just
to
make
sure
that
I
understood
correctly
we're
not
to
use
this
for
the
2021
budget.
However,
if
there's
something
that
is,
you
know,
presumed
to
be
longer
term
expense
related
to
code
and
it
could
be
used.
C
So
the
first
example
that
came
to
mind
is
that
I
know
we
can
use
funding
to
help
with
education
with
the
digital
divide,
for
example,
providing
the
education
resources
to
students
who
are
participating
remotely,
and
so
would
that
be
an
example
of
where
we
could
use
that
funds.
We
there's
two
major
focuses
there.
We
have
the
devices
and
then
we
have
the
infrastructure
and
the
infrastructure
get
the
wi-fi
connectivity
would
be
something
that
I
would
imagine
would
be
a
little
bit
longer
term
than
between
now
and
december.
30Th.
F
Thank
you
question.
Let
my
mom
account
for
the
record.
This
is
actually
been
a.
That
is
a
really
great
question.
We
actually
is
a
bit
more
of
the
other
way
around.
This
one
can
only
be
used
for
purposes
that
are
from
march
1st
through
december
30th
and
infrastructure
projects
generally
take
quite
some
time,
so
we
have
found
that
when
it
comes
to
any
type
of
broadband,
you
know,
I
think,
that's
going
to
require
a
a
more
time.
F
We
we
have
not
been
able
to
use
a
fund,
even
though
that
is
an
essential
piece
of
what
is
needed
and
certainly
would
be
directly
related
to
helping
in
the
way
that
we
would
intend
it
to,
because
the
funds
are
limited
to
december
30th.
We
are
unable
to
do
projects
like
that.
We
they
can't
be
turned
around
in
that
time
frame
as
far
as
it
being
the
reference
of
it
being
budgeted,
not
budgeted.
F
It
can
only
be
used
for
coronavirus,
related
expenditures,
so
the
caveat
on
that
is
obviously
it
could
be
a
budgeted
item
such
as
payroll,
but
if
you're
you
had
budgeted
for
certain
services
for
that
person
and
now
that
it's
been
shifted
to
respond
to
covert
mitigation,
that
shift
is
why
it
is
now
allowed
so
two
two
very
different
rules,
but
the
main
thing-
and
I
think
the
main
point
and
really
great
question
about
education-
is
that
on
those
larger
projects,
especially
when
it
comes
to
connectivity
connectivity,
those
are
generally
larger
projects
and
we
just
simply
can't
do
them
by
december
30th.
C
That's
discouraging
to
hear,
but
thank
you
for
the
answer
and
my
last
question
would
be
on.
C
Let's
see
page
29
of
the
presentation-
and
I
hope
these
are
aligning
I'm
just
going
off-
of
the
download
of
the
slides
on
on
the
legislative
website,
but
it's
the
one.
That's
titled
appropriations,
nevada,
total
1.25
billion.
It
says
that
the
minimum
payment
of
1.25
billion
is
what
nevada
received.
C
Could
you
help
us
understand
a
little
better?
Did
every
state
only
receive
the
minimum
payment?
F
Leslie
mullen
camp
for
the
record
again
really
great
question:
the
treasury
formula
was
based
on
population,
and
so
they
did
have
a
minimum
threshold
for
those
states
that
have
a
smaller
population
and
it
just
so
happens.
Their
formula
nevada
was
a
state
that
has
a
smaller
population,
so
we
actually
received
the
minimum,
the
baseline,
the
1.25
million
or
a
billion
dollars
as
because
we
did
we,
our
population
is
actually
lower.
F
So
if
they
had
not
provided
that
baseline-
and
it
was
just
strictly
on
the
formula-
we
would
have
received
it
less
than
that.
So
in
this
case
we
were
happy
to
get
the
1.25
billion,
I
think
the
other.
As
far
as
your
question
about
other
states.
Yes,
that
is
correct
states
like
montana
north
dakota.
F
You
know
some
some
of
the
other
states
that
have
smaller
populations.
They
received
the
exact
same
1.25
billion
because
they
also
had
smaller
populations
and
they
they
ended
up
receiving
the
baseline
amount.
A
You
I'll
go
to
senator.
I
had
a
couple
people
in
the
queue
senator
kikifer.
G
G
F
Leslie
mullen
camp
for
the
record.
I
can
definitely
answer
the
first
part
of
your
your
question.
This
was
one
area,
as
we
just
highlighted
that
the
guidance
documents
and
faqs
have
been
updated
quite
a
few
times.
F
We
we
were
given
direction
during
the
first
guidance
document.
That
incurred
meant
actually
expanded,
so
that
would
mean
anything
that
where
the
funds
actually
moved
and
were
expended,
it
was
their
update
and
I
do
believe
it
was
at
the
end
of
june.
F
Yes,
I
believe
it
was
the
june
30th
update
the
treasury,
updated
their
guidance
and
then
provided
a
very
long
explanation
of
what
we
could
now
identify
as
incurred,
which
is
actually
that
we
have
the
goods
or
services
have
been
delivered,
but
the
expectation
is
is
that
those
would
be
paid
or
the
funds
to
to
pay
for
those
would
happen
within
90
days.
F
So
again,
I
think
with
that
shift,
it
was
a
a
good
addition
that
they
had
made
because
it
will
now
allow
for
goods
and
services
to
be
delivered
through
december
30th
and
with
the
ability
to
actually
make
those
payments
within
a
reasonable
time
of
90
days,
and
then
I
think
that
that
answers
the
first
part
of
your
question
as
far
as
how
we
are
going
to
ensure
that
our
own
state
agencies
are
going
to
be
able
to
do
that.
That
is
a
question.
F
F
You
know
things
that
carry
over
past
into
a
full
year.
Those
are
some
examples
of
where
it's
been
a
challenge.
Each
agency
or
program
that
is,
is
looking
to
use.
The
funds
has
to
explain
how
they're
going
to
continue
the
cost
pat
after
december
30th,
without
using
the
coronavirus
relief
fund.
G
G
If
I
can
follow
up,
mr
the
so
just
specifically
like
a
rental
assistance
program
that
we've
been
talking
about
or
that
we
have
in
place,
how
do
we
determine
when
a
good
or
service
is
provided,
then?
Is
that
an
executed
agreement
between
a
landlord
and
the
housing
authority?
And
then
we
would
have
90
days
after
that?
To
pay?
Is
that
you
know
it's
it's
hard
to
I
mean
there
are
different
ways.
F
Leslie
mullen
camp
for
the
record.
You
bring
up
a
really
great
point.
Each
program
is
unique
in
its
uses
and
I
think
with
your
example
on
on
the
rental
assistance
program.
The
requirement
is
those
funds
would
have
to
be
out.
There's
there
would
be
no
going
past
december
30th,
the
last
transfer
of
funds
to
a
renter
would
have
to
occur
on
or
before
december
30th.
F
Now,
the
actual
services.
You
know,
because
there's
administrative
costs
involved
in
a
program
like
that
those
would
have
to
be
those
services
would
have
to
be
delivered
on
or
before
that
date
as
well.
But
if
we
had
a
bill
you
know
from,
for
example,
for
a
website,
or
you
know
you
know
any
kind
of
administration.
F
A
Thank
you,
and
this
is,
of
course,
all
assuming
that
the
rules
don't
change
again
I'll
go
on
to
assemblyman
roberts.
B
B
F
Leslie
mullen
camp
for
the
record.
Yes,
thank
you
for
your
question.
The
the
rules
on
how
there
is
a
population
formula
that
was
provided
by
the
treasury
and
it
very
clearly
determined
how
to
how
they
allocated
those
amounts.
F
Those
direct
payment
amounts
to
a
city
or
a
county
with
a
population
over
500
000,
and
they
they
laid
out
the
the
method
to
do
that
and
that
was
provided
on
the
treasury
website
as
part
initially
as
part
of
the
announcement
of
the
availability
of
funds
and
and
the
ability
to
get
those
payments
directly.
F
We
for
the
remaining
local
governments,
the
smaller
local
governments.
We
applied
the
exact
same
formula
to
ensure
that
it
was
equitable.
B
Just
a
quick
follow-up
on
on
senator
brooks's
comments
earlier
in
some
of
the
chairman's
comments,
so
the
the
state
allocation
that
is
left
over
is
we're
holding
on
to
some
of
that
in
case
there's
rule
violations
or
that
in
case
we
have
to
backstop
and
pay
back.
Some
is
that
is
that
allocation
of
funds
for
that
purpose,
or
we're
holding
some
of
that
for
that
purpose,
just
to
clarify.
F
Leslie
mullen
cam
for
the
record.
I
believe
director
brown's
going
to
be
going
over
the
allocation
piece
here
shortly.
Actually,
I
think
it's
coming
up
next
and
she'll
be
able
to
talk
about
oh
yeah,
no,
no
problem.
B
B
F
Leslie
mullen
camp
for
the
record.
I
I'm
not
aware
that
and-
and
you
I
just
may
need
a
rephrase
of
the
question.
F
B
Local
government,
as
far
as
what
they,
what
their
allocation
would
be.
But
again
I
don't
know
how
many
have
actually
drawn
down
money.
F
Leslie
mullen
camp
for
the
record,
yes
and
I
think
you're
you're,
probably
referring
to
the
handout
or
the
sheet
that
provides
information
about
the
local
government's
planned
uses.
We
have
allocated
the
allocation
to
the
local
governments,
was
conducted
in
two
two
increments
50
increment,
first
up
front
and
and
then
a
second
one
upon
ex
you
know
a
request
in
an
expenditure
validation
of
expenditure
of
the
the
first
allocation,
and
so
what
what
we
have
listed
there
you
can
see.
F
There
is
the
date
that
those
local
government
received
their
their
first
half
of
the
allocation,
and
you
can
see
that
all
of
them,
with
the
exception
of
three,
have
received
their
payments,
their
first
allocation
payments,
the
second
column
over
there
on
that
worksheet
provides
the
actual
second
half
of
the
allocation
and
you're
going
to
see
that
there
are
only
a
couple
of
them
that
that
have
actually
received
their
second
allocation.
F
And
it's
just
due
to
timing.
We
we
expect
that
that
list
will
grow
substantially
in
the
next
coming
weeks.
B
Thank
you
and
again
I
apologize
if
I'm
ahead,
of
where
I
should
be.
A
H
Thank
you,
mr
speaker,
and
I
think
my
question
will
kind
of
lead
into
what's
left
so
at
the
onsite
of
this
meeting,
we
heard
from
public
comments
from
some
of
our
local
municipalities,
where
they
feel
there
was
their
understanding
of
the
treasury's
rules
were
different
than
what
the
the
state's
understanding
was.
So
the
allocations
that
were
were
made.
H
A
number
of
the
southern
nevada
cities
and
local
municipalities
did
not
receive
funding
that
they
felt
that
they
were
due,
and
we've
heard
that
the
rules
have
changed
at
least
nine
times
as
we've
gone
along
this
process.
But
my
question
would
be
that,
as
as
we're
looking
forward
in
the
context
of
the
plans
of
those
next
steps,
and
how
can
we
address
those
differences
moving
forward
with
the
monies
that
are
left
over
because
we
know
that
those
local
municipalities
did
have
some
of
the
higher
impacts
from
the
coronavirus
in
their
communities.
H
F
Leslie
mullen
camp
for
the
record.
I
I
do
believe
that
one
of
the
the
the
ways
that
we
could
look
at
at
least
the
allocation
for
the
local
governments
is
that
what
has
gone
out
so
far
has
been
in
line
with
the
population
based
allocation
that
the
treasury
set
forth,
and
so
each
one
of
those
allocations,
whether
it
was
from
the
treasury
down
to
the
county
and
the
city
or
what
was
remaining
from
the
state
that
was
allocated
out
to
those
local
governments.
F
F
So
I
I
do
believe
that
everything
else
is
being
reviewed
as
a
according
to
what
is
needed,
and
so
I
do
believe
that
certainly
some
of
those
items
are
addressed
in
the
programs
and
what's
being
approved
in
terms
of
what's
needed,
because
I
know
that
most
of
those
are
are
looking
at
direct
needs.
And
how
do
we
address
those?
H
So
in
saying
that
so
of
the
local
municipalities
that
have
had
direct
impact
and
and
costs
and
expenses
that
occurred
since
the
onset
of
the
coronavirus
and
did
not
receive
direct
funding
from
the
state
if
they
are
able
to
show
that
they
have
had
these
expenses
that
would
qualify
and
they
fit
within
those
populations
that
are
less
than
the
500
000
and
we're
getting
towards
the
end
where
we
need
to
spend
this
money
before
the
end
of
the
year
and
they
have
actually
spent
it.
H
Providing
services
for
their
constituents
and
providing
housing,
assistance
and
rental
assistance.
And
and
what
have
you
and
food
assistance
for
food
insecurities
in
these
communities?
Could
that
be
a
future
work
program
to
allocate
these
remaining
resources
to
help
those
local
municipalities
that
did
not
get
funding?
In
the
beginning?.
F
Leslie
mullen
camp
for
the
record.
I
I
think
in
this
case
reviewing
the
rest
of
the
the
presentation,
because
I
think
that
will
give
you
a
good
idea
of
where
the
allocations
are
going
and
it
may
address
some
of
that
very
directly,
but
but
we
we
would
be
happy
to
answer
that
question.
F
I
think
when
you
see
really
where
the
remaining
allocations
go,
it
might
help
to
to
address
that
if,
if
that's
okay
to
maybe
see
if
we
can
revisit
that
question
at
the
end
of
the
presentation
that
might
help
okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
C
H
Yes,
thank
you
so
much
speaker
and
thanks
for
the
question
I
just
wanted
to
circle
back
on
a
conversation
we
were
having
earlier,
because
something
was,
I
ringing
a
bell
about
a
specific
action
that
we
did
during
our
first
special
special
session
and
allocations
of
funding
and
schools
and
the
ability
to
have
broadband
connectivity
and
internet
connectivity
and
devices
and
such
like
that,
because
we
did
pass
and
or
we
did
allocate
50
million
dollars
to
to
department
of
education
to
allocate
out
to
the
school
district
specifically
for
those
purposes.
H
And
so
I
didn't
want
the
record
to
be
left
that
we
couldn't
do
that,
because
in
fact
we
had
in
section
117
of
ab3
and
that
maybe
that
distinction
in
that
conversation,
the
takeaway
for
the
public,
is
you
know
that
we
can't
go
out
and
do
large
infrastructure
programs,
but
but
the
state
certainly
is
acknowledging-
and
we
acknowledged
in
legislators
as
legislators,
who
supported
that
bill
that
need
for
internet
connectivity
and
in
those
allocations
of
funds,
really
did
want
to
encourage
the
school
districts
to
look
at
access
and
equity
and
devices.
H
And
I
know
each
district
has
approached
that
differently
and
distinctly,
but
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
were
reflective
of
the
work
that
we
had.
F
Done
leslie
mullen
camp
for
the
record.
Yes,
I
I
100
100
agree
with
that.
I
think
the
all
of
the
the
state
agencies
and
programs
that
have
been
looking
to
use
these
dollars
have
been
extraordinarily
innovative
and
resourceful
in
understanding
that
they
are.
There
are
limits,
and
you
know,
especially
with
education.
F
You
know
they
look
to
to
find
the
solutions
where
they
would
be
able
to
get
the
devices,
and
you
know
hot
spots
and
things
that
they
could
accomplish
in
such
a
short
time,
and
they
they've
done
a
wonderful
job
with
that.
I
think
you
know
in
acknowledging
that
I
definitely
wanna
to
differentiate.
F
If,
if
we
needed
to
to
increase
broadband
connectivity
in
a
rural
area,
though
that
would
be
a
major
infrastructure
project
that
would
carry
on
far
longer.
So
absolutely
I
would
agree.
They've
there's
been
a
lot
of
innovative
solutions
to
try
to
to
improve
that
connectivity.
Despite
the
the
restrictions
on
the
fun.
A
Are
you
good
assembly
one
all
right?
I
don't
think
I
see
any
other
questions
if
we
can
move
on
to
the
next
part
of
the
presentation
to
be
great.
F
Okay,
thank
you
leslie
mullin
camp
for
the
record
again
so
it
at
this
point.
We
are
going
to
move
into
another
section
of
the
presentation,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
the
presentation
over
to
director
susan
brown
and
she's,
going
to
cover
a
little
bit
more
on
where
we're
at
with
the
coronavirus,
release,
fund,
expenditures
and
obligations
and.
E
And
so
there
leslie
could
you
put
the
slides
back
up?
Please.
E
E
E
E
G
E
A
work
program
that
is
in
the
works
for
ppe
for
school
districts.
We
are
working
with
the
department
of
education
and
the
division
of
emergency
management.
On
that
work
program.
Now
we
are
uncertain
about
any
possible
surge
in
the
fall,
so
we've
set
aside
about
75
million
dollars
to
prepare
for
that.
E
We
know
we
have
much
more
to
do
in
providing
business
assistance
for
economic
recovery,
workforce
development,
support
and
tourism.
So,
as
there
is
50
million
dollars
obligated
for
these
efforts
and
work
programs
will
be
are
pending
for
some
of
the
these
funds.
Now
state
agencies
are
still
trying
to
respond
to
the
need
to
operate
while
also
staying
safe
during
the
pandemic.
We
anticipate
that
costs
may
be
higher
for
eligible
crf
expenses
in
the
coming
months,
as
agencies
try
to
put
up
protective
barriers,
improve
telework
and
provide
ppe
supplies
to
employees
and
civilians.
E
I
would
note
that
this
12
million
has
been
set
aside
to
assist
with
costs
at
the
department
of
employment,
training
and
rehabilitation,
and
that
could
be
for
things
such
as
salaries
of
employees
that
work
at
other
departments
that
are
coming
in
and
helping
out
to
address
the
backlog
for
dieter
and
then
through
senate
bill
1.
There
was
a
program
for
alternate
dispute
resolution
evictions
program
that
was
created
through
senate
bill.
E
One
three
million
dollars
has
been
allocated
for
that
purpose
and
we
expect
to
see
a
work
program
come
through
fairly
quickly
on
that
and,
finally,
we
have
for
additional
rental
assistance
set
aside
an
additional
10
million
dollars,
and
this
will
go
to
the
counties
where
it
is
needed.
The
most
so
final
decisions
have
not
been
made
yet
on
where
this
10
million
dollars
will
go.
E
So
you
can
see
we
have
about
1.6
million
dollars
that
has
not
currently
been
allocated.
However,
this
could
be
impacted
by
congressional
changes,
so
target
amounts
are
not
set
in
stone
and
because
again,
the
guidance
continues
to
change
regularly.
The
final
allocations
may
be
impacted
by
these
changes
as
well.
E
So
this
final
slide
represents
the
fema
funds
that
have
come
in
through
work
programs
to
the
state's
accounts
using
crf
to
match
the
federal
dollars.
If
this
cr,
if
these
chrono
virus
really
funds
were
not
available,
the
state
would
have
had
to
come
up
with
other
funding
sources
to
match
these
funds,
and
you
can
see.
We've
used,
22.3
million
in
corona
virus
really
funds
to
leverage
72.2
million
dollars
in
fema
pandemic
funds.
G
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
appreciate
it.
So
can
we
start
talking
a
little
bit
about
the
reimbursement
to
state
agencies?
We
there
was
about
97
million
dollars.
I
think
on
your
slides,
for
that
have
been
already
approved.
Does
that
does
that
include
both
fiscal
year
20
and
then
what
was
also
authorized
for
fiscal
year
21
during
the
or
what
was
was
presented
during
the
special
session?
So
is
that
everything
that
we've
seen
so
far.
E
G
E
E
G
Yeah,
so
I
remember
mr
fisher
presented
with
sort
of
great
authority
the
guidance
that
authorized
the
use
of
these
funds
for
for
the
welfare
field
service
officers
that
that
he
was
using.
G
Do
we
have
additional
guidance
for
all
of
these
other
areas?
I
mean
this
is
about
200
and
almost
220
million
dollars
that
we're
using
to
backfill
positions
that
we've
budgeted
for
already.
Is
there
any
indication
that
these
are
that
this
is
going
to
be
audited
by
the
federal
government?
Is
there
a
risk
that
you
know
worse
that
we're
spending
this
inappropriately,
or
do
we
have
clear
guidance
for
each
of
these
expenditures,
like
we
had
for
welfare
welfare
field
services
during
the
special
session.
G
Is
there
on
on
the
item
that
was
also
listed
on
the
sheet
regarding
the
25
percent
of
the
of
the
national
guard
expenditures?
There
was
a
there
was
an
article
today
indicating
that
our
application
for
100
federal
reimbursement
was
denied.
Is
there
a
way
to
appeal.
G
Okay,
I
mean
it
seems,
like
you
know,
california
received
100
so
to
connecticut
and
florida
it
seemed
like
there
was
no
necessarily
no
necessary
rhyme
or
reason
as
to
why
nevada
was
denied
that
if
you
could
follow
up
on
why
that
denial
was
was
made
and
if
there's
a
process
to
appeal
it.
I
would
be
appreciative.
Thank
you.
E
C
D
You
for
the
record,
this
is
michelle
white
through
youtube,
senator
key
kepper.
Thank
you
for
the
question.
We.
F
D
D
He
reached
out
requesting
calls
with
the
president
but
did
not
receive
any
response
back
to
get
one
scheduled
reached
out
to
the
vice
president
entered
the
white
house
task
force
as
well
and
sent
multiple
letters
of
communication,
emails
and
communication
directly
with
white
house
staff.
But
ultimately
again
it's
a
decision
with
the
president
and
on
wednesday
evening.
D
D
F
D
Office
and
and
employ
the
white
house
and
the
administration
to
provide
that
to
the
state,
considering
our
current
situation.
G
I
appreciate
that
and
if
there's,
if
there's
any
changes
or
updates
which
love
to
hear
about,
thank
you.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I.
H
I'm
sorry
that
if
you
hear
frustration
in
my
voice,
I
I
hear
it
from
the
citizens
and
my
district
and
the
small
business
owners
in
my
district
and-
and
we
heard
it
from
our
local
municipalities
at
the
onset
of
this
meeting,
how
they
feel
that
our
communities
have
been
marginalized
even
more
than
they
already
are.
H
We
we're
seeing
that
people
are
not
going
back
to
work
in
the
numbers
that
we
had
hoped
that
they
would
be
able
to
go
back
to
work,
we're
seeing
people
lose
their
homes,
have
difficulty
feeding
their
children
and
we're
still
doing
digital
classrooms.
You
know
right
now,
I'm
in
this
meeting,
but
I'm
also
the
digital
classroom
teacher
for
my
grandchildren.
H
So
I'm
frustrated
because
our
numbers
are
so
high
here.
So
I
would
really
like
that
there
would
be
a
plan
as
we're
moving
forward
to
make
sure
that
if
those
monies
that
are
still
left
for
code
that
we
have
to
use
by
the
end
of
this
year
would
be
able
to
be
utilized
in
those
communities
that
did
not
receive
the
direct
funding,
either
from
the
federal
treasury
or
from
the
state
to
deal
with
the
expenses.
The
advocacy
that
they
have
had
to
deal.
H
A
And
I'd
like
to
add,
I
think
that
it's
difficult
to
answer
these
kind
of
questions
when
we're
only
dealing
with
the
state
part
of
it,
and
I
heard
a
local
official
as
well.
I
think
that
in
subsequent
meetings,
where,
where
we'll
have
an
opportunity
to
have
local
government,
I
think
we'll
certainly
be
revisit
these,
but
at
the
very
least
I
believe,
moving
forward.
A
A
lot
of
this
is
going
to
require
collaboration
and
planning
upfront,
and
I
I
I
have
said
frequently
that
you
know
colby
didn't,
send
us
a
memo
saying
it
was
coming
and
we
had
to
adapt
and
it's
going
to
require
all
of
our
local
governments
and
the
state
to
to
to
collaborate
and
communicate
and
coordinate,
and
I
I
think,
we'll
obviously
hear
more
from
from
local
government
moving
forward
as
well,
while
I'm
at
it.
A
I
think
you
know
health
and
human
services,
the
k-12
and
higher
ed
emergency
management,
public
safety
and
local
government
economic
development
are
areas
that
I
think
we
will
likely
want
to
address
moving
forward,
and
so
just
so
you
all
know.
Obviously,
this
is
gonna,
be
the
only
time
that
we
are
able
to
have
these
conversations
and
and
I'm
certain
that
that
this
presentation
will
give
rise
to
you,
know
more
questions
and
more
requests
as
we
move
forward,
as
well
as
a
form
to
make
recommendations.
B
A
No,
I
don't
know
bps,
do
we
still
have
ms
white
online.
H
B
Give
us
one
moment,
speaker.
B
The
speaker
ferris-
and
this
is
melissa
from
broadcast.
I
believe
we
were
waiting
for
the
presenter
zu
caller
to
unmute
herself.
A
B
G
Thank
mr
speaker,
and
as
we're
waiting
is
probably
from
ms
brown.
I
know
that
we
deposited
all
of
the
836
million
dollars
into
a
single
state
budget
account.
What
is
the
current
balance
in
that
account?
So,
ultimately,
how
much
do
we
still
have
to
push
out
the.
F
C
B
Speaker
fryerson:
this
is
melissa
with
broadcast.
We
are
going
to
take
a
short
little
break,
just
see
if
we
can
get
that
presenter
zoom
up
and
rolling.
Please
stand
by.
We
apologize.
A
All
right
so
quickly.
A
B
B
Speaker
we
apologize
if
you
could
just
give
us
a
couple
more
seconds.
H
A
Sure
committee,
I
I'm
not,
I
mean
we're
we're
close
to.
I
mean
at
the
end
of
the
presentation,
and
we
still
obviously
after
that
public
comment.
Why
don't
we
just
take
a
five
minute
break
we've
been
at
it
and
you
know
folks
may
need
a
a
quick
break
anyway.
So
if
you
all
could
come
back,
it's
12
o'clock
straight
up
right
now,
if
you
can
come
back
in
five
minutes,
maybe
we'll
be
able
to
finish
this.
A
A
All
right,
I
think,
where
we,
where
we
were,
I
think
miss
brown,
I
think,
was
addressing
a
concern
raised
by
was
it
senator,
boikachia
and
or
some
of
the
one
on
monroe
moreno.
B
Yeah,
it
was
kind
of
a
combined
question,
mr
mr
speaker,
mr
chair,
but
yeah
just
curious.
If
clark
county
was
supposed
to
actually
pick
up
the
pieces
for
those
jurisdictions,
boulder
mesquite
in
those
those
cities
in
clark,
county.
F
Leslie
mullen
camp
for
the
record
so,
and
I
believe
this
is,
is
where
we
were
at
before.
F
I
was
going
to
pretty
much
outline
the
the
structure
of
how
the
treasury
allocated
the
funds,
and
it
was
based
on
population
and
and
just
to
give
you
an
example
of
of
how
it
worked
any
entity
that
qualified
to
receive
the
direct
funding
used
the
population
within
that
entity
as
the
factor
or
the
amount
that
was
given.
F
So
when
both
clark
county
and
las
vegas,
the
city
of
las
vegas
qualified
the
formula
called
to
fund
the
city
first,
basically
to
take
that
population
amount
and
extract
it
out
and
then
provide
the
funds
based
on
the
population
of
the
city.
First
then,
whatever
was
left
over
in
the
population
base
for
the
county
would
then
be
funded
based
on
the
remaining
population.
F
So
when
both
entities
were
funded,
the
city
of
las
vegas
was
funded
very
directly
for
the
direct
population
that
was
within
it.
But
the
county
clark
county
was
funded
based
on
all
of
the
entities
other
than
the
city
of
las
vegas
that
were
within
that,
and
that
was
what
the
amount
that
was
allocated
so
essentially
the
cities
boulder
city,
henderson
north
las
vegas,
their
population
was
put
into
that
formula
for
clark
county.
B
A
follow-up-
if
I
may
mr
chair,
then
as
we
did
the
distribution-
and
I
say
we
on
the
state
side,
but
clearly
we
did
it
for
a
county,
let's
say
elko
county
and
then
we
reached
out
to
the
city
of
elko
wells,
carl
and
wendover,
and
they
they
received
an
allocation
as
well.
So
I
was
just
curious
how
that
worked.
F
Leslie
mullen
count
for
the
record
that
we
followed
the
exact
same
formula
that
the
treasury
used
to
do
that,
and
so,
when
we
calculated
our
formula,
it
was
based
on
the
exact
same
formula
and
so
in
the
example
of
elko
county.
We
hold
out
the
population
bases
for
carlin,
oco
city,
well,
city,
west,
wendover
city.
We
fi.
We,
we
applied
the
population
formula
on
that
and
then
whatever
was
left
over
was
what
was
allocated
to
elko
county
and
again.
This
was
the
exact
same
formula
that
the
treasury
used
for
their
direct
allocation.
B
A
H
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I'm
I
just
kind
of
wanted
to
piggyback
on
what
senator
gokuchi
was
saying
and-
and
I
want
to
say
that
you
know
in
clark
county.
Our
our
county
commissioners
have
been
wonderful
and
their
partnership
with
our
cities
have
been
great
and
the
cities
are
are
very
appreciative
and
thankful
and
grateful
for
the
partnership
that
they
have
with
the
county,
and
the
county
has
been
able
to
give
them
some
funding,
just
not
the
amount
of
funding
that
those
local
municipalities
feel
by
their
population
that
they
were
due
and
and
insane.
H
I
appreciate
the
comments
from
the
state
about
the
allocation
for
population
and
following
the
rules
of
how
that
allocation
was
decided.
However,
we're
dealing
with
a
virus
that
had
no
rules
to
follow
and
it
didn't
care
about
the
population,
and
unfortunately,
we've
seen
the
higher
numbers
of
cova
cases
in
southern
nevada,
so
hopefully
moving
forward.
H
Although
there
may
be
rules
of
how
the
funding
came
down
from
the
federal
government,
there
may
be
some
disagreement
between
local
municipalities
in
the
state
of
how
that
is
laid
out.
We
do
know
that
the
cases
of
covet
19
have
been
much
greater
in
southern
nevada.
So
perhaps,
as
we
look
at
future
funding
going
forward
and
and
depleting
what's
left
of,
our
cares
dollars
that
we
go
by
where
the
cases
are
greatest,
not
necessarily
looking
at
the
population
numbers.
But
the
actual
cases
of.
A
Copenhagen,
thank
you
assemblywoman
and
again.
I
think
that
when
we
have
an
opportunity
to
hear
from
local
government
as
well,
we
you
know
we're
we're
working
through
this
as
we
go,
and
when
we
have
to
make
adjustments,
I
think
we
certainly
need
to
be
open
to
making
those
adjustments.
C
A
C
So
I
appreciate
this
discussion
and
I
I
want
to
just
echo
the
sentiments
of
assemblyman
monroe
mourinho
about
just
taking
a
look
at
how
the
formula
for
how
it's
allocated-
and
I
understand
maybe
the
initial
reasoning
behind
population
based,
but
I
think
factoring
in
a
need-based
assessment-
is
also
appropriate
and
I
would
add
to
in
addition
to
the
number
of
cases
also,
since
there
is
a
good
portion
of
this.
That
has
to
do
with
economic
relief,
and
I
know
that
you
know
just
hearing
the
the
comments
from
assemblyman.
B
C
The
hurting
you
know,
families,
people
who
are
out
of
work,
losing
their
homes
etc
also
be
factored
into
that,
because
it
could
be
that
they
don't
have
a
case
of
covid,
but
that
they
are
in
a
region
where
they're
economically
impacted
disproportionately
as
well.
So
I
just
think
both
of
those
factors
are
worthy
of
being
considered,
and
additionally,
I
would
just
like
to
echo
the
sentiment
that
I
think
having
a
the
next
meeting
incorporate
county
and
city
representatives.
C
So
we
can
hear
from
them
is
just
an
excellent
game
plan
for
an
agenda,
and
I
know
that
we
are
somewhat
stored
on
time.
You
know,
as
we
look
at.
E
G
C
A
Thank
you
and,
and
again
I
think,
it's
worthwhile
to
reiterate.
We
are
not
in
a
position
to
allocate
funds
other
than
to
work
programs
for
ifc,
but
we
certainly
are
in
a
position
to
give
the
state
an
opportunity
to
to
lay
out
what's
been
done
and
going
to
be
done
and
hear
from
folks
that
have
suggestions,
but
along
those
lines
I
want
to
go
back
to
director
brown.
I
think
when
we
kind
of
got
frozen,
senator
keith.
A
If
I
had
a
question
about
the
balance,
I
don't
want
to
oversimplify
center
key
cover.
G
Yeah,
it
was
pretty
that
it
was
pretty
much
that
simple.
What's
the
what's
the
current
balance
in
the
in
the
account
that
we
deposited
the
836
million
into.
G
Because
that's
okay,
so
614
million
left
and
we're
feeling
confident
we're
going
to
get
that
all
out
before
the
end
of
the
calendar
year.
Right.
E
A
Sure,
if
you,
along
the
same
lines,
obviously
you
know
the
rules
are
changing
as
we
go.
We're
doing.
You
know
fairly
well
and
hope
to
not
have
a
resurgence,
but
what
is
the
plan
if,
if
for
whatever
reason,
it
appears
that
there
are
remaining
funds
leading
into
december
30th?
What's
the
plan
for
the
remaining
funds.
E
A
Thank
you
thank
you,
and,
and
thank
you,
director
brown
and
your
offices
work
with
us
collaboratively
during
the
special
sessions
to
kind
of
flush
that
out
make
good
use
of
it
and
we
want
to
be
prepared
just
in
case.
G
Mr
speaker
yeah,
I
wanted
to
follow
up
on
that,
so
the
the
current
plan
is
to
take
any
unallocated
or
unused
karzak
money
into
to
backfill.
The
ui
trust
fund
is
that.
Did
I
just
hear
that
right.
G
Are
there
okay,
I
mean
that's,
that's
not
something
we
usually
support
with
other
sources
of
funds.
We,
you
know
there
are
dedicated
taxes
that
that
go
to
that
trust
fund.
Is
there?
Are
there
any
other
opportunities
to
to
to
use
those
funds
in
a
way
that
would
comply
with
the
parameters
of
the
of
the
act
itself
and
the
guidance
we've
received
so
far?
If
they're
not
expended
for
a
specific.
E
Purpose
so,
with
the
guidance
changing
we've
had
some
recent
guidance
changes
that
we
need
to
work
through.
That
may
provide
some
other
opportunities
to
extend
these
funds
on
salaries
that
were
not
previously
allowed
might
be
one
option,
so
we
are
really
looking
into
how
we
can
spend
these
funds
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
have
anything
left
over
at
the
end.
G
Is
the
is
state
unemployment,
a
specifically
called
out
allowable
expense
under
the
guidance
so
far.
G
Okay,
I'd
like
to
circle
back
on
this
one,
mr
chairman,
at
a
at
a
future
meeting,
I
just
the
ui
program
is
something
we're
going
to
fund
anyway,
one
way
or
another,
and
I'm
just
not
sure
if
it's
the
highest
and
best
use
of
these
dollars.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
and
I
don't
want
to
mislead
everybody
by
suggesting
that
this
is
the
plan.
I
think
this
is
the
worst
case
scenario,
contingency
if
things
change
or
adjust
to
where
we
get
to
december
30th,
and
it
has
not
there's
anything
left
that
has
not
been
utilized,
but
I
think
the
best
laid
plan
is
to
use
it
for
the
step
forward
purposes
and
make
sure
that
we
we
don't
get
there
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
director
brown.
A
I
think
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
you,
but
what
I
heard
was
that
we
don't
plan
on
getting
to
that
point,
but
because
many
of
us
keep
asking
if
we
do
for
whatever
reason
to
end
up
at
that
point,
this
is
what
would
happen,
but
the
plan
is
to
not
have
money
left
over.
The
plan
is
to
use
it
for
the
set
forth
purposes.
My
accurate
map.
A
You
if
I,
if
I
just
a
couple
more
questions,
backing
up
a
little
bit
as
we
move
forward
and
hear
from
other
stakeholders
and
local
government
and
whatnot
about
ideas
and
recommendations.
A
E
Susan
brown,
for
the
record,
there
is
a
work
program
that
I
received
yesterday
or
the
day
before
for
economic
recovery
through
goed
that
is
pending,
and
we
are
working
with
department
of
education
and
division
of
emergency
management.
Like
I
mentioned
earlier
on,
ppe
for
school
districts,
so
that
work
program
should
be
coming
forward
fairly
quickly
and
then,
with
the
information
on
the
nevada
national
guard
on
the
25
fema
match
that
one
should
be
coming
forward
as
well
fairly
quickly.
A
And
so
right
now
is
there?
Is
there
not
a
a
balance
of
unallocated
federal
dollars
available
right
now
I
mean
if,
if
folks
are
going
to
be
coming
to
make
requests,
for
example,
is
it
a
request?
That's
only
if,
for
whatever
reason,
some
of
the
other
programs
don't
work
out
or
is
there,
you
know
an
account
or
a
balance
available
for
additional
requests.
E
A
F
Holds
this
is
leslie
mullen
camp
for
the
record
that
actually
was
in
the
law
itself,
so
it
did
provide
a
very
specific
call
out
on
the
amount
intended
to
go
to
local
governments
being
45
percent.
B
G
A
I
think
a
lot
of
folks
are
wanting
to
wait
for
some
of
the
other
stakeholders
and
their
opportunity
to
present
and
have
some
questions
answered.
A
Here
we
go
oops
all
right.
Well,
I
think
that
that
concluded,
the
presentation
am
I
correct,
wrecking
around.
A
Okay
well,
thank
you
again
and-
and
I
appreciate
the
work
not
only
that
we
did
leading
up
to
this
through
this
interim,
but
recognizing
that
it's
valuable
to
have
this
conversation
and
let
the
public
know
where
we
are
and
what
our
plans
are
moving
forward
and,
quite
frankly,
to
convey
a
sense
of
readiness
that
we
are
preparing
for
different
contingencies.
So
again
I
mentioned
it
earlier.
A
I
will
reach
out
to
members
about
subsequent
meetings.
Obviously
you
coordinate,
but
the
things
that
I
mentioned
earlier
are
the
things
that
I
think
are
on
the
table
and
that's
various
departments.
Let
me
find
my
notes
here:
between
k-12
and
higher
education,
emergency
management,
public
safety,
local
government
and
economic
development.
A
I
will
reach
out
to
members
about
thoughts
that
they
have
and
ideas.
They
have
on
structure,
moving
forward
to
roll
this
out
and
create
a
productive
way
to
to
to
ask
these
questions
and
get
this
out
in
the
public
and
then
make
recommendations
if
we
have
any
that
are
not
already
taken
care
of
in
the
plans
that
are
set
forth.
So
with
that
and
again
thank
you,
director
brown
and
ms
mullen
camp
and
and
the
governor's
office
for
for
providing
this
information.
A
I
think
it
was
it's
very
important
for
us
to
be
able
to
have
this
conversation.
I
don't
believe
there
are
any
other
questions
right
now
right
now,
so
I
am
unless
miss
jones
tells
me
that
I've
left
something
out
prepared
to
move
on
to
item
seven
and
provide
just
a
couple
minutes
for
vps
to
get
ready
for
our
public.
B
A
All
right,
thank
you
very
much
and
for
you
all,
even
though
we've
had
less
time,
I
did
look
at
2009
in
the
hour
funding
and
the
way
that
we
did
a
similar
exercise
and
and
reviewing
what
those
federal
dollars
are
being
used
for.
And
I
think
that
we
are
right
on
track,
although
schedule
wise
quite
a
bit
off,
but
on
track
with
the
first
meeting
having
been
an
overview
and
then
subsequently
wanting
to
see
some
details.
A
A
C
A
All
right
well,
thank
you
again
and
thank
you
all
for
your
thoughtful
conversation
about
this.
Looking
forward
to
hearing
from
you
all
about
ideas,
moving
forward
and
scheduling
the
subsequent
meeting
that
get
a
better
grasp
on
this
and
be
able
to
our
our
neighbors
about
what
we're
doing
between
now
and
the
end
of
the
year
to
to
to
make
best
use
of
the
funds
available.
So
with
that
and
there
being
no
other
comment,
we
are
adjourned.
Thank
you
guys.
So.