►
Description
For agenda and addtitional information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature. The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process. All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
Good
morning,
everyone
it
is
september
21st
2021,
and
this
is
a
special
joint
committee
to
conduct
a
study
concerning
the
innovation
zones
brought
to
us
by
senate
concurrent
resolution
number
11..
Thank
you
so
much
to
the
public
presenters
for
waiting
patiently
for
us,
as
we
were
sorting
out
some
technical
issues
just
so
that
members
of
the
public
know
our
screen
share.
Option
is
not
going
to
be
available
today
and
we
apologize
for
that.
A
But
if
you
do
go
to
the
special
joint
committee
to
conduct
a
study
concerning
the
innovation
zone
web
page
from
our
legislative
council
bureau's
website,
you
will
find
all
of
the
packets
and
information
that
we're
going
to
be
reviewing
today.
In
addition,
I've
have
asked
the
presenters
to
give
us
page
cues
so
that
that
way
as
we
move
through
the
presentations
us
legislators
and
the
public
will
be
able
to
follow
along
and
hopefully,
a
seamless
way.
A
We
have
a
quorum,
let's
go
to
agenda
item
2
public
comment,
so
public
testimony
under
this
item
may
be
presented
by
phone
or
by
written
comment
because
of
time
considerations.
Each
caller
offering
testimony
will
be
limited
to
two
minutes.
Testimony
at
the
end
of
two
minutes.
You
will
hear
a
member
of
our
broadcasting
staff,
letting
you
know
that
you
are
up
on
your
time
and
then
we
will
move
on
to
dial
in
and
provide
testimony
during
this
time.
You're
welcome
to
call
669
900
600.
A
881-9713-6713
and
then
press
the
pound
sign.
If
you
have
any
questions,
dialing
in
you
can
contact
our
staff
at
684-6990.
C
D
Good
morning
committee,
this
is
jamie
rodriguez
from
washoe
county.
I'm
calling
in
today
on
the
proposals
in
front
of
you.
We
did
have
some
meetings
with
the
proponents
during
the
legislative
sessions
and
we
do
have
some
concerns
with
the
original
proposal.
D
However,
we
do
understand
that
there
are
some
changes
that
this
group
will
be
discussing
and
we
look
forward
to
those
discussions,
hoping
that
some
of
the
changes
will
help
address.
The
governance
concerns
that
we
had
specifically
if
an
innovation
zone
were
ever
to
come
to
washoe
county,
but
also
with
a
specific
innovation
zone
being
discussed,
the
impact
it
would
have
on
neighboring
jurisdictions,
such
as
housing
or
services
provided
by
washoe
county,
as
well
as
the
infrastructure
concerns
specific
to
congestion
on
interstate
80..
D
For
those
of
you
who
are
up
north
are
very
aware,
I'm
sure
that
one
accident
can
really
shut
down
the
interstate
for
several
hours,
if
not
half
of
the
day,
and
so
we've
been
working
very
closely
with
story
county
to
try
to
help
come
up
with
some
concerns,
and
so
we
do
have
concerns
that
adding
a
large
population
to
use
that
interstate
could
just
multiply
that
congestion.
D
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
the
committee
today,
I'd
like
to
provide
comments
regarding
the
draft
language
for
bdr
22
1109
that
was
made
available
during
the
last
special
committee
meeting
on
innovation
zones.
Try
gib
met
with
the
blockchain
team
on
multiple
occasions
last
spring
in
order
to
discuss
the
innovations
on
concept.
The
proposed
build
draft
language
and
the
district's
related
concerns
until
bbr
22
1109
was
made
available
at
the
august
special
committee
meeting.
D
Additionally,
information
presented
to
the
special
committee
by
blockchains
at
your
last
meeting
conflicts
with
information
that
tried
gid
received
from
blockchains
in
march
of
this
year.
We
are
unsure
why
this
is
the
case,
and
we
want
to
bring
this
to
the
attention
of
the
special
committee
igibs
submitted
for
the
record
a
detailed
letter
outlining
the
specifics
of
our
concerns
around
the
language
in
bbr
221109,
along
with
supporting
documentation
regarding
our
questions
and
the
correspondence
between
trade,
gid
staff
and
blockchains.
D
C
D
First
off
it's
that
generally,
this
is
insulting
to
all
of
nevada's
local
governments,
and
hopefully
all
of
their
concerns
are
are
being
heard
and
understood
and
I'll
start
off
also
by
talking
about
a
previous
innovation
zone
or
smart
city
that
has
been
used
by
proponents
of
this
as
an
example
of
or
a
model
of
what
they're
trying
to
do
here.
D
D
The
other
concern
that
we
have
is
that
it
is
insulting
to
local
governments,
because
currently
in
in
the
version
that
is
in
the
attachment
of
this
bdr,
it
shows
that
the
commissioners
or
the
the
autonomous
governing
authority
of
this
may
provide
services
to
the
people
inside
of
it.
D
D
D
C
E
C
E
C
C
E
C
Moves
towards
green
energy
and
a
carbon-friendly
footprint
this
zone
has
presented
a
desire
to
develop
and
implement
these
goals
as
nevada
moves
forward.
The
state
has
the
opportunity
to
be
a
leader
in
the
development
of
innovation
zone
concept
while
at
the
same
time
creating
strong
jobs,
a
greener
environment.
E
C
C
D
I've
written
to
all
members
of
this
study
and
felt
I
should
also
add
my
comments
for
the
actual
study
meeting
during
public
comments.
My
husband
and
I
are
pinotrock
residents
in
story
county
where
the
blockchain
innovation
zone
development
is
proposed.
All
of
the
agencies
that
innovation
zone
proponents
say
will
slow
down
its
construction.
D
Are
there
for
good
reason?
Oversight
is
what
makes
for
a
safe,
well-considered
and
well-balanced
development
to
allow
a
developer,
to
show
up
by
a
large
chunk
of
land
in
a
rural
county
and
by
waving
around
a
lot
of
money
as
inducement
to
the
state
jump
over
all
guidelines
that
have
been
carefully
put
in
place
over
time
to
protect
the
environment,
the
public
interests
and
various
long-term
relationships
and
interest
in
the
area
is
unconscionable.
D
It
is
important
to
point
out
that
all
the
marketing,
as
well
as
highly
paid
lobbyists,
pushing
for
innovation
zone
concept,
do
not
present
facts.
They
are
opinions
to
present
opinions
as
if
they
are
facts
as
dishonest,
which
makes
me
wonder
what
else
are
the
innovation
zone
proponents
being
disingenuous
about
in
order
to
push
the
innovation
zone
bill
through?
D
D
D
The
innovation
bill
includes
many
elements,
the
type
of
money
to
be
used
in
the
innovation
innovation
zone
and
undefined
right
to
build
any
type
of
development.
They
choose
a
change
of
governance
way
too
many
diverse
issues
within
one
proposal
in
the
interim
and
in
the
end
will
story
county
end
up
holding
the
bag,
for
who
knows
what
costs
and
responsibilities
or
who
knows
how
long?
Whether
development
succeeds
or
fails.
D
D
D
C
A
C
A
We
will
move
on
to
agenda
item
four
overview
of
the
bill,
drop
request,
29
1109
authorizing
the
question
of
the
innovation
zones,
and
so
at
this
time
we
have
a
number
of
different
presenters.
We
have
mr
ernot
miss
combs,
miss
reagan,
thomas.
We
have
mr
vasiliatas,
mr
aguero
and
mr
hobbs,
and
just
a
reminder
to
you
folks
that
neither
the
we
don't
have
the
screen
share.
A
G
G
The
bill
draft
was
the
product
of
months
of
hard
work
by
some
of
the
most
experienced
public
policy
people
in
our
state.
It
was
created
thoughtfully
and
with
an
underlying
foundation.
Responsibility
for
the
magnitude
of
the
ask
itself,
it's
important
for
the
committee
to
know
we
understand
exactly
what
we're
asking
for
and
why
we
understand
the
risks
and
we
understand
the
enormous
rewards
for
the
state
and
our
economy.
G
Yes,
there
were
a
number
of
additions
and
amendments
ate
all
that
were
submitted.
That
did
not
make
it
into
this
bill
draft.
Obviously,
we
were
very
respectful
of
the
lcb
and
their
time
commitments,
and
these
are
issues
that
I'm
sure
will
be
taken
up
in
mass.
At
a
later
hearing.
We
wanted
to
focus
today
on
the
bill
draft
that
we
were
afforded
by
the
council
bureau
and
then
move
on
to
other
issues
in
the
future.
G
Words
on
a
page,
an
actual
bill,
drop
facts
to
discuss
and
debate
a
reckoning
day
of
sorts.
We
have
the
opportunity
to
walk
this
committee,
finally
through
an
innovation
zone
and
what
it
actually
is,
how
it's
created,
how
it
would
operate,
no
more
hyperbole,
no
more
what
ifs.
Today
we
have
the
facts
and
facts
matter,
because
in
the
past
many
months
we
have
found
ourselves
in
a
position
of
discussing
what
an
innovation
zone
isn't
as
much
as
what
it
is.
G
You
have
to
go
to
the
ballot,
that's
not
true
either,
I'm
sure
all
of
you
know,
because
you're
students
of
nevada
history,
that
when
nevada
was
created
in
1864,
there
was
only
11
counties
and
now,
of
course,
there's
17..
G
So
five
other
counties
would
take
carson
city
out
of
it.
They're
unique
in
many
ways,
one
of
which,
of
course
is
carson.
City
is
a
combined
city
and
county,
but
the
other
five
counties
were
created
in
almost
exactly
the
same
way,
simply
by
legislative
action
number
one
and
ironically
enough
for
much
the
same
purpose.
G
In
fact,
the
last
county
to
be
split
off
from
another
was
our
most
populous
county
clark
county,
which
was
split
off
from
lincoln
county
to
take
full
opportunity
of
the
expansion
of
the
railroads
which
were
an
emerging
technology,
then
in
southern
nevada.
G
Madam
chairwoman,
I'd
like
to
introduce
with
your
indulgence,
allison
combs,
who
will
walk
us
through
the
bill
draft
itself.
H
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
committee
today
for
this
time
today.
For
the
record,
my
name
is
allison
cones,
director
of
public
policy
for
r
r
partners
in
your
packet.
I
believe
you
have
the
powerpoint
for
presentation
today
and
I
will
give
the
prompts
of
the
slide
numbers
that
I
am
referencing
as
I
go
through
the
presentation,
starting
just
with
the
cover
slides
side,
one,
the
overview
of
nevada
bill
draft
authorizing
the
creation
of
innovation
zones.
A
H
Yes,
thank
you
and
the
slide
numbers
are
in
the
ribbons
on
the
left
hand,
side
of
the
slides,
starting
on
the
second
side.
H
So
moving
to
slide
number
two,
the
presentation
will
go
through
the
provisions
of
the
bdr,
including
first
the
general
ideas
and
vision
that
guided
the
development
of
the
bill
draft.
Second,
the
matter
in
which
the
bdr
itself
is
drafted
as
a
general
act.
It
is
enabling
legislation
with
applications
statewide
and
not
for
the
creation
of
one
particular
innovation
zone.
H
H
Legislative
oversight
is,
of
course,
built
into
the
process
and
into
the
future,
so
moving
to
slide
three,
starting
with
the
overarching
ideas
or
vision
that
guided
the
drafting
of
the
bdr
and
the
reasons
for
requesting
it,
many
of
which
are
reflected
under
the
legislative
declaration
drafted
in
section
2
and,
of
course,
the
purpose
of
an
innovation
zone
which
is
to
develop
or
advance
the
use
of
innovative
technology
in
the
zone
and
moving
to
slide.
Four.
H
Moving
to
slide
seven
interwoven
throughout
the
spill
draft
is
the
guiding
vision
and
purpose
of
an
innovation
zone
which
is
to
develop
or
advance
the
innovative
technology
for
which
the
zone
was
created
and
provisions
throughout
the
build
draft
reflect
this
purpose.
But
the
language
under
section
19
of
the
build
here
is
called
out,
as
it
is
one
of
the
sections
that
clearly
and
comprehensively
ties.
H
As
stated
in
the
summary
at
the
beginning
of
the
bdr,
it
provides
for
the
creation
of
innovation
zones.
This
enabling
legislation
authorizes
but
does
not
create
a
particular
innovation.
Sound
and
as
stated
in
the
title,
the
subject
embraces
the
bdr
that
the
bdr
is
for
economic
development,
providing
for
the
creation
organization
and
governance
of
innovation
zones
created
again
for
the
purpose
of
developing
and
advancing
certain
innovative
technologies
moving
to
slide
10.
H
The
next
we'll
start
with
section
1
of
the
bdr.
This
section
creates
the
new
chapter
for
the
substantive
provisions
of
the
bill
under
nrs
title
22,
which
includes
laws
governing
cooperative
agreements
by
public
agencies,
regional
transportation,
commissions
planning
and
zoning
development
and
redevelopment
moving
to
slide
11.
H
Next,
for
both
clarification
and
substance,
the
bdr
amends
the
preliminary
lim.
Excuse
me
preliminary
chapter
of
nrs,
chapter
0,
that
includes
definitions
and
other
provisions
that
apply
throughout
nrs
under
section
35
of
the
bdr
nrs
0.0305
is
amended
to
provide
that
the
term
board
of
county
commissioners,
as
used
throughout
nrs,
also
includes
the
board
of
supervisors
of
an
innovation
center.
H
Under
section
36
nrs
0.033
is
amended
to
include
an
innovation
zone
under
the
term
county
with
the
same
limitation
that
applies
to
carson
city.
Under
that
section
of
nrs,
which
is
to
the
extent
the
new
chapter,
treats
the
innovation
zone
differently,
the
new
chapter
will
govern
thus
all
provisions
requirements,
duties
throughout
nrs
for
counties
and
boards
of
county
commissioners
are
now
intended
to
include
and
apply
to
an
innovation
zone
moving
to
slide
13.
C
H
This
list
includes
blockchain
autonomous
technology,
the
internet
of
things,
robotics,
artificial
intelligence,
wireless
technology,
biometrics
and
renewable
resource
technology.
This
section
also
authorizes
the
goed
executive
director
to
expand
this
list
by
regulation.
If
a
technology
is
not
listed
here
that
satisfies
the
definition
of
innovative
technology
under
section
9
of
the
bdr,
if
an
applicant
proposes
an
innovative
technology
for
a
zone
that
is
not
specified
in
the
bill
or
has
not
been
added
by
regulation,
the
executive
director
cannot
schedule
the
required
public
hearing
on
the
application
until
determining
whether
the
proposed
technology
meets
the
statutory
definition.
H
And
finally,
this
section
authorizes
goed
to
adopt
regulations
deemed
necessary
or
in
the
public
interest
in
carrying
out
the
application
process,
the
provisions
of
the
application
and
the
appointment
of
the
board
members
next
moving
to
section
13.
This
section
sets
out
the
requirements
for
the
application
to
create
an
innovation
zone.
H
H
Again,
these
provisions
reflect
the
vision
and
purpose
of
an
innovation
zone.
Only
those
seeking
to
establish
an
innovation
zone
for
developing
or
advancing
innovative
technology
would
be
able
to
apply
under
this
legislation.
To
create
one
and
the
applicant
must
include
a
comprehensive
general
plan,
which
is
important.
H
An
estimate
of
the
number
of
employees
anticipated
to
be
engaged
in
construction
of
the
infrastructure,
commercial
developments
and
residences,
and
the
number
of
employees
anticipated
to
be
employed
by
businesses
in
the
zone
within
10
and
20
years.
After
its
approval,
and
importantly,
the
plan
must
include
the
manner
in
which
the
development
will
incorporate
innovative
technology
throughout
the
zone.
H
H
Along
with
an
estimate
of
how
much
this
will
generate.
It's
important
to
note
that
this
tax
or
fee
is
approved
under
separate
legislation
from
this
one
and
approval
of
an
innovation
zone
is
contingent
upon
its
passage
that
legislation
must
also
specifically
indicate
that
the
tax
or
fee
qualifies
for
purposes
of
creating
an
innovation
zone.
H
H
H
H
H
If
an
application
is
approved,
the
next
stage
in
the
development
of
an
innovation
zone
is
its
initial
operations
and
remember
at
the
time
of
approval,
it's
still
undeveloped
and
uninhabited
land
sections.
20
16-22
of
the
bdr
cover
the
effect
of
the
approval,
the
appointment
of
the
board
of
supervisors
and
the
authority.
The
board
has
and
does
not
have
during
this
initial
stage.
H
H
H
H
H
H
It's
also
important
to
note
that
the
board
members
are
public
officers
under
this
section
and,
as
will
be
discussed
under
section
19
as
well.
They
are
subject
to
and
must
comply
with.
The
existing
laws
applicable
to
any
other
political
subdivisions
and
their
officers
moving
to
the
next
slide
slide.
22
section
18
covers
salaries
and
provides
that
the
board
members
are
entitled
to
the
same
salaries
paid
to
the
county.
Commissioners
in
the
surrounding
county.
H
Moving
to
the
next
slide
slide:
26
under
subsection
3,
any
contractual
obligations
of
the
applicant
or
restrictions
on
the
use
of
the
land
owned
by
the
applicant
within
the
zone
that
existed
when
the
application
filed
remain.
In
effect,
the
zones
board
is
given
the
authority
to
assume
the
obligations
or
negotiate
modifications
to
the
extent
that
any
of
these
obligations
or
restrictions
conflict
with
the
general
plan
that
was
approved
in
the
application
process
or
the
development
of
the
zone.
H
Moving
to
slide
28,
so
under
section
29
as
discussed,
certain
taxes
are
prohibited
during
the
stage,
but
what
about
other
taxes
and
fees
under
section
20,
except
it's
limited
by
section
19?
The
board
can
impose
any
other
tax
or
fee
that
a
county
can
as
a
general
rule.
If
it's
not
excluded,
the
board
will
be
able
to
impose
it.
H
Until
that
time,
the
county
would
be
receiving
the
tax
or
fee
revenue,
since
it's
providing
the
service
subsections.
Two
and
three
clarify
other
methods
through
which
the
zone
will
be
able
to
generate
revenue,
especially
in
these
early
years,
when
there
are
no
residents
and
the
development
is
just
getting
started,
business
license
fees
and
development
agreements.
H
Subsection
2
gives
the
board
the
authority
to
act
as
a
business
license
department.
It
generally
would
have
this
authority,
but
this
provision
is
included
for
clarification
and
efficiency,
because
under
nrs
chapter
364,
which
governs
business
licensing,
multiple
county
offices
are
involved
and
the
zone
may
not
yet
have
created
all
of
those
offices.
During
this
initial
stage,
subsection
3
gives
the
board
the
specific
authority
to
include
a
provision
and
development
agreements
for
payment
for
support
of
the
innovation
zone
that
may
be
used
to
pay
for
authorized
costs.
H
H
Moving
to
slide
30.
as
you'll
recall,
from
section
16
in
general,
county
offices
still
have
authority
in
the
zone
until
the
board
is
asked
to
assume
the
duties
of
that
office.
Section
22
gives
the
innovation
zone
board
the
authority
in
this
initial
stage,
to
start
assuming
the
duties
of
one
or
more
county
offices,
including
the
clerk
recorder,
sheriff
treasurer
assessor
auditor
district
attorney
and
public
administrator.
H
H
When
the
zone
assumes
responsibility
for
that
office
in
the
zone,
an
exception
is
provided
for
the
election
powers
of
the
clerk
or
registrar
of
voters.
Until
the
zone
first
holds
elections,
the
zone
board
can
create
that
office
or
contract
for
the
duties,
but
those
offices
just
can't
have
the
election
duties
yet
moving
to
slide
31
the
initial
stage
of
permissive
operations
after
approval
goes
along
for
several
years,
as
the
zone
gradually
assumes
county
duties
and
services.
H
H
Moving
to
slide
32,
so
under
section
23,
when
the
board
of
supervisors
determines
that
it
is
prepared
to
assume
within
the
zone
all
duties
and
services
of
the
county.
The
board
of
supervisors
must
give
notice
to
the
county
of
its
intent
by
april
1st,
before
the
start
of
the
next
fiscal
year
on
july,
1.,
the
assumption
of
duties
takes
effect
on
july
1,
and
the
intent
of
this
90
day
days
notice
is
to
allow
the
county
and
the
zone
time
to
prepare
for
the
transfer.
H
At
this
time,
the
board
may
also
elect
to
assume
the
responsibilities
of
the
school
district
prior
to
this
time.
It
could
not
do
so
if
the
board
chooses
not
to
at
this
time.
It
may
do
so
at
the
beginning
of
a
subsequent
fiscal
year
after
providing
notice
to
the
board
of
trustees
of
the
school
district
in
the
surrounding
county
by
april
1st,
as
drafted,
the
board
is
not
allowed
to
consider
assuming
his
duties
of
education
until
this
stage.
H
The
exception
for
election
duties
continues
until
elections
are
conducted
in
the
zone
under
section
32
of
the
act.
So
at
this
time,
county
ordinances
also
no
longer
apply.
The
board
has
a
mandate
to
review
all
of
the
ordinances
and
adopt
any
that
are
necessary
for
the
operation
of
the
zone
prior
to
july
1..
H
H
If
the
zone
board
elects
to
assume
the
duties
of
the
school
district
when
it
takes
over
county
duties
under
section
23,
section
26
makes
the
board
the
board
of
trustees
for
the
zone
school
district.
This
section
also
gives
them
authority
to
establish
public
schools
contract
with
charter
schools
enter
into
a
cooperative
agreement
with
another
district,
as
provided
under
existing
law
or
any
combination
thereof,
to
provide
education
for
the
purposes
of
nrs.
The
board
is
deemed
the
school
board
and
the
innovation
zone
is
deemed
a
school
district
and
all
of
the
related
laws
would
apply.
H
Sections
26
and
28
include
provisions
to
ensure
that
the
money
follows
the
student.
The
board
will
now
be
imposing
property
taxes,
which
will
be
discussed
under
section
27,
which
include
taxes
for
the
support
of
education,
but
the
board
only
receives
funding
the
education
funding
if
it
has
taken
over
education,
if
not
the
county
school
district
does
section.
39
is
a
technical
amendment
to
nrs
392.010.
H
Existing
nrs
allows
the
admission
of
students
from
adjoining
districts
under
certain
circumstances,
and
this
amendment
clarifies
that
counties
adjoining
the
county
that
surrounds
the
innovation
zone
are
considered
adjoining
to
the
innovation
zone
as
well
for
purposes
of
admitting
to
pupils
in
their
school
districts.
Without
this
clarification,
the
only
adjoining
district
would
be
the
surrounding
county.
H
H
It
pays
the
mandatory
taxes
according
to
existing
statute
and
then
out
of
the
property
tax
revenue
pays
the
surrounding
county,
an
annual
hold
harmless
amount.
It
is
then
allowed
to
retain
any
remaining
amount.
There
is
an
assumption
built
in
that
the
property
values
will
go
up
in
future
years
as
the
development
continues
and
will
serve
as
a
revenue
source
for
the
zone
as
it
grows.
H
The
innovation
zone
may
use
this
revenue
for
any
purpose
allowed
under
nrs
sub
4
allows
the
innovation
zone
to
impose
any
other
optional
sales
or
use
taxes
that
a
county
may
impose
and
requires
the
zone
to
you
to
impose
any
other
mandatory
ones
that
come
up
subsequently
under
section
30,
similar
to
sales
and
use
taxes
and
for
the
same
reasons,
to
protect
the
county.
The
board
must
match
the
county
rate
for
fuel
taxes
and
may
use
the
revenue
as
allowed
in
the
governing
tax
statutes.
H
H
Moving
to
slide
42,
there
are
three
primary
areas
of
legislative
control.
First,
this
legislation
itself
authorizing
the
creation
of
the
innovation
zones
in
the
first
place,
including
the
requirements
to
be
eligible
for
consideration
for
approval
to
create
an
innovation
zone
and,
if
approved,
how
it's
structured
and
governed
and,
of
course,
the
mandated
reporting
under
the
bdr.
H
Second,
the
requirement
for
a
separate
bill
passed
by
the
legislature
to
create
an
industry-specific
tax
or
fee
on
an
innovative
technology
to
be
used
in
an
innovation
zone
and
that
legislation
must
specify
that
that
tax
or
fee
qualifies
for
purposes
of
creating
a
zone
under
the
new
chapter.
Without
it,
the
application
cannot
move
forward.
H
A
Thank
you
so
much.
I
appreciate
that
mrs
combs,
and
so,
if
I'm
understanding
right,
then
the
rest
of
the
presenters
you
have,
they
don't
have
specific
presentations,
they're
just
on
hand
to
respond
to
questions
that
committee
members
have
correct.
A
Okay,
so
in
that
case,
members
of
the
committee
we've
had
a
walk
through
of
the
language,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
open
it
up
to
questions
and
so
you've
got
a
question
just
raise
your
hand
and
I'll
make
sure
that
I
try
to
keep
you
folks
on
track.
So.
C
I'll
start,
I
have
a
long
list
I'll
just
I'll.
Just
do
one
question
and
see
if
anybody
else
asks
any
of
the
other
ones
as
we
go
along
and
I'll
come
back
to
it.
So
you
you
address
the
issue
of
the
seed
tax.
I
guess
I
I
want
to
know
a
little
bit
more
about
that.
How
that
initially
got
impacted,
but
once
you
take
over
all
services,
then
you
get
something
similar
to
what
the
the
other
zone
that
currently
do
that.
C
Would
it
impact
how
the
dc
test,
even
after
you're,
fully
functioning,
how
that's
the
tax
would
it
be.
H
Yes,
I
will
take
an
initial
response
to
that
and
ask
the
panel
members
to
jump
in
if
they
would
like
the
zone
only
receives
the
amount
generated
in
the
prior
year.
It's
not
intended
to
delve
into
the
sea
tax.
I
This
is
jeremy
aguero,
just
just
to
expand
on
that
just
a
bit.
The
idea
is
for
both
the
first
tier
in
the
second
tier
distribution
under
the
consolidated
tax,
to
not
be
affected
by
this.
Essentially,
what
revenue
is
generated,
essentially
a
newers
back
to
the
zone
itself,
so
the
idea
here
is
for
it
to
not
have
any
of
those
effects
not
be
a
guaranteed
county,
like
some
that
I
know
you're,
aware
of
in
the
state
of
nevada
and
not
to
be
a
subsidizing
county
like
what
we
have
in
the
state
of
nevada.
I
C
Thank
you,
and
actually,
let
me
ask
one
more
different
subject:
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
school
district
funding,
how
that
would
work.
I
mean,
as
I
think
about
it,
just
because
I
haven't
really
thought
about
it
until
you
just
talked
about
it,
how
that
would
impact
all
the
rest
of
the
districts,
because
you
know
having
a
smaller
district
of
fewer
students
is
actually
more
expensive
per
student.
C
I
Madam
share,
with
your
permission,
I'll,
take
a
stab
at
that
one
senator
dennis
I
I
I'm
gonna,
be
cautious
about
explaining
something
to
you
that
you
pretty
much
created.
So
forgive
me
if
I'm,
if
I'm
going
into
too
much
detail
or
not
enough,
the
dollars
will
follow
the
students.
I
The
equity
adjustments
that
exist
within
the
county
of
origin
will
continue
within
this
county
as
well.
They
will
receive
the
same
formulaic
adjustments
and
the
dollars
will
follow
the
students.
Both
the
weighted
funding,
as
well
as
the
base
funding,
will
follow
the
students,
whether
they're
in
the
zone
or
whether
they're
outside
of
the
zone
depending
on
the
election
period,
and
what
that
election
is
made
so
to
again
boil
it
down
to
its
essence.
Those
students
will
receive
the
same
amount
of
funding
they
would
have.
I
Otherwise
if
the
zone
had
not
been
created
under
the
people-centered
funding
plan,
recently
enacted
by
the
state
of
nevada.
I
Yes,
senator
dennis
that
would
be
correct.
Obviously,
the
adjustment
that
would
be
necessary
there
would
be
determined
whether
it's
a
charter
school
or
not.
A
charter
school
as
you're
well
aware,
there's
some
distinctions
there
in
terms
of
how
ultimately
it
operates,
but,
yes,
it
would
be
treated
like
any
other
school
in
any
other
district
anywhere
else
in
the
state
of
nevada.
Under
the
pupil
centered
funding
plan.
A
Thank
you
so
much,
and
I
I
do
have
our
tax
staff
available,
knowing
that
we
had
might
have
some
questions
in
this,
so
I
just
want
to
check
in
with
them
real,
quick
and
see
if
there
was
anything
they
wanted
to
add
in
terms
of
clarification
or
additional
comments
on
the
the
sea
tax
piece.
C
Madam
chair,
this
is
russell
again
and
principal
deputy
physical
analyst
with
the
fiscal
analysis,
division,
legislative
council
bureau.
I
just
think
that
there
might
be
some
discussions
that
would
have
to
be
had
with
your
lcb
staff,
with
the
mr
aguero
or
miss
combs
or
others
with
regards
to
the
seatac
provisions,
because
it's
reconciling
the
current
statutory
provisions
that
are
in
the
nrs
for
the
sea
tax
versus
looking
at
and
then
looking
at
the
language,
that's
actually
included
in
the
bdr
and
then
being
heard.
C
What
is
verbally
being
said
as
to
what
the
vision
is
for
those
words
that
are
in
the
bdr,
because
the
one
of
the
issues
is
that
we'll
have
to
discuss
is
that
the
there
are
some
of
the
sea
tax
revenues
that
are
they're
not
generated
in
a
place
they
are
collected
and
then
distributed
such
as
cigarettes
and
liquor.
C
So
there's
going
to
have
to
be
some
discussion
and
or
reconciliation
as
to
getting
the
statutory
revisions
correct
the
match
division,
because
I'm
not
sure
at
this
point
in
time
that
what
is
in
the
bdr
would
effectuate
what
was
being
verbally
stated.
C
Of
course
that
could
be
part
of
a
misunderstanding
on
my
part,
but
that
would
be
something
that
if
this
committee
under
the
legislature
was
going
to
move
forward
with
such
a
proposal,
then
there
could
be
discussions
that
would
have
to
be
had
by
your
lcp
staff,
with
others
to
work
out
the
necessary
statutory
language,
because
I'm
not
sure
whether
there
would
need
to
be
changes
made
to
those
actual
statutory
chapters
which
are
implementing
the
taxes
and
having
them
be
distributed
at
the
first
tier
in
each
of
those
chapters
versus
just
this
somewhat
generic
language
that
is
currently
sitting
in
the
beat.
C
So,
madam
chair,
that
was
just
the
comments
that
I
would
have
as
staff,
and
so
I
think
it's.
This
is
the
first
opportunity
for
your
staff
to
try
and
match
up,
what's
verbally,
being
presented
with
the
words
in
the
bdr
and
so
out
of,
and
then
trying
to
match
that
up
with
the
current
stats
toward
revisions.
A
J
J
Let's
just
say,
I
have
some
experiences
with
sea
tax
and
the
concepts
put
forward
when
communities
start
and
state
they
don't
want
and
see
tax
and
then
things
change.
I
see
this
potential
community,
though,
as
being
one
that
would
be
a
benefit
after
all.
Why
would
we
create
it
or
think
of
creating
something
if
it
is
not
a
benefit
economically?
I
Madam
chair,
this
is
jeremy
aguirre
I'll,
take
I'll
try
to
take
a
stab
at
it.
Senator
settlemyre.
I
think
they
are
contributing
to
the
consolidated
tax
right.
The
taxes
that
they're
generating
within
the
region
are
just
being
brought
in
to
the
mix,
I
suppose
perhaps
the
question
and
I'm
clarifying
my
own,
and
you
can
tell
me
whether
I'm
not
thinking
about
it
right,
is
whether
or
not
they
could
somehow
or
should
somehow
be
conceptualized
as
a
guarantee.
I
Excuse
me
as
a
subsidizing
county
right,
where
they're
generating
so
much
in
taxable
retail
sales,
for
example,
that
under
the
provisions
within
the
sea
tax,
where
they
would
be
redistributing
that
money
to
other
jurisdictions
that
somehow
they
should
be
treated
in
that
way,
I
mean,
obviously
that
would
be
a
long
way
out,
and
I
think
the
primary
goal
was
to
make
sure
that
no
other
jurisdiction
was
actually
subsidizing
them.
I
As
part
of
this
process
and
the
the
the
issues
you
bring
up
relative
to
firmly,
I
think,
are
very
fair
and
ones
that
we
had
a
lot
of
conversations
about
as
we
were
sort
of
going
through
this
exercise.
Obviously,
the
goal
at
the
outset
here
is
to
provide
all
services
and
then
receive
all
of
the
available
taxes.
I
We
don't
want
to
run
into
that
again,
because
I
think
those
are
some
legitimate
concerns
that
firmly
has
and
they've
been
difficult
to
sort
of
resolve.
As
we've
gone
through
this
that
having
been
said,
I
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
nothing
about
this
that
would
make
this
this
innovation
zone
or
anything
that's
created,
would
be
receiving
any
type
of
redistribution
of
consolidated
tax
dollars
in
mr
gandon's
comments
are
ones
that
I
take
very
seriously,
and
obviously
he
has
a
great
deal
of
knowledge
and
experience
relative
to
that.
I
There
would
be
no
effort
to
try
and
even
respecting
the
fact
that
things
like
cigarettes
and
liquor
are
relatively
de
minimised
in
terms
of
the
aggregate
totals
in
terms
of
what's
distributed.
We
certainly
would
want
to
make
sure
that
those
are
cities
back
to
the
point
of
location
and
not
sort
of
created
any
any
other
way
that
would
result
in
any
kind
of
redistribution
of
those
funds.
So
you
know
that
being
the
ultimate
goal
and
I'll
come
back
to
what
ms
combs
said
at
the
end
of
her
presentation.
I
To
the
extent,
I
suppose
that
so
much
revenue
was
being
generated
somewhere
down.
The
line
that
you
needed
to
the
legislature
needed
to
revisit
the
consolidated
tax
and
its
distribution
will
always
have
the
ability
to
do
that
as
the
state
of
nevada
has
done
since
the
consolidated
taxes
inception
again,
I
think
that
the
primary
effort
was
to
ensure
that
we
weren't
sort
of
stepping
into
that
guarantee
status,
which
would
have
meant
a
redistribution
of
dollars
back
in
to
the
district.
J
I
appreciate
the
clarification
and
I
agree
with
you,
mr
guerrero-
that's
what
I
was
trying
to
ask
is
to
ensure
that
they
did
not
become
a
guarantee,
however,
being
a
sending
one
in
order
to
benefit
communities
around
if
they
generated
excess
revenue
beyond
that
status
would
seem
beneficial
to
those
communities
around
the
rest
of
the
state
in
vernacular
that
I'm
used
to
is
usually
whether
you're
called
a
cache
county
or
a
cal
county.
However,
this
is
in
the
county,
but
I
think
you
understand
you
very
well
understood
what
I
was
trying
to
get
toward.
J
A
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
do
have
a
few
questions
as
well,
but
I
will
just
do
one
or
two
and
then
see
what
other
members
have
and
might
ask
for
another
round
of
re-up
time.
So
you
know
one
question.
I
actually
would
like
to
ask
it's
a
little
bit
bigger
picture.
F
We
we've
heard
and
received
some
comments
and
heard
during
public
comment
about
questions
and
concerns
with
the
bill,
so
I
was
wondering
for
the
bdr,
so
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
just
provide
some
big
picture
background
on
how,
since
this
has
first
been
brought
out
and
discussed
with
stakeholders
what
what
changes
have
been
made
to
incorporate
some
of
the
the
feedback
that's
been
proved
presented
and
address
some
of
those
concerns.
G
Madam
chairwoman,
maybe
I
can
take
that
one
on
senator
watts,
a
great
question.
So
a
couple
of
things
this
bill
draft
was
delivered
to
the
council
bureau
in
february,
in
accordance
with
obviously
statute
from
the
governor's
office
and
over
the
course
of
the
session,
we
had
a
number
of
conversations
with
different
stakeholders.
G
From
from
you
know,
mining
to
other
counties
to
general
improvement
districts.
There
was
a
number
of
different
items:
environmental,
compacts
and
and
social
responsibility
issues
as
well.
Unfortunately,
in
the
final
draft
that
that
we
received
none
of
those
were
incorporated
into
the
bill
drop,
which
is
fine
from
the
standpoint
that
we
have
a
bill
draft
that
we
began
with.
G
It
had
sort
of
the
predicate
issue
here
of
how
this
is
created
and
we
thought
rather
than
pick
and
choose
which
ones
we
talked
about
today
or
that
we,
you
know
drank
from
even
more
enormous
fire
hose
in
in
all
of
the
issues
of
this.
Is
it
talking
about
them
in
mass
and
in
detail
in
subsequent
meetings?
So
there's
issues
about
you
know
the
mining
industry
being
exempted
like,
as
I
talked
about
gid
issues
and
a
number
of
different
things,
and
we
had
planned
to
talk
through
those
again
in
future
meetings.
G
I
in
a
perfect
world
they
would
have
been
incorporated
into
this
draft,
but
you
know
the
last
six
months
has
been
anything
but
a
perfect
world
for
all
of
us,
including
all
around
the
legislative
process.
F
Thank
you,
mr
ernad.
I
appreciate
that
so
you
know
I
I
just
think
we'll
need
to
have
some
additional
follow-up
so
that
we
can
begin
to
see
some
iterations
of
red
lines
that
that
show
some
of
those
things
as
we
move
forward
as
as
you're
kind
of
taking
the
lead
and
gathering
that
feedback
and
and
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
address
it
as
well
as
being
kind
of
the
the
visionaries
behind
the
proposal.
F
So
we're
looking
to,
I
think,
looking
to
you
a
bit
to
see
how
you
take
that
feedback
and
and
incorporate
it
even
in
a
draft
version
knowing
that
it
might
not
be
exact
lcb
language
to
see
how
some
of
those
things
are
addressed.
But
I
appreciate
that
that
feedback.
G
Just
you
know
we
did
draft
them,
they
are
draft,
and
so
you
know
they'll
be
discussed
in
detail.
Much
like
this
was
we're
excited
about.
I
mean
we're
proud
of
the
fact
that
there
was
a
lot
of
work
done
with
stakeholders
through
the
legislative
session,
even
though
it
didn't
progress
to
a
formal
hearing
during
the
session.
So
we're
as
anxious
to
have
the
conversation
as
you
are
hopefully
to
participate
in
hearing.
F
Great,
I
appreciate
that
and
I
think
it'll
be
helpful
once
we're
able
to
discuss
that
version
as
well.
It
sounds
like
it'll
be
a
little
bit
more
up
to
date.
The
other
question
that
I
had
is
around
section
13,
sub,
1
f,
and
it's
really
this
language
around
can
secure.
This
has
been,
I
think,
one
of
the
top
issues
for
me.
F
So
you
know
the
the
language
and
just
to
pull
it
up
here,
certification
by
the
applicant
that
the
applicant
has
secured
or
can
secure
access
to
public
utilities
and
natural
resources
necessary
for
the
development
proposed
for
the
zone,
and
so
that
that
can
secure
languages,
in
my
opinion,
pretty
speculative
and
opens
the
door
for
potential
issues
in
having
the
zone
approved
and
and
begin
to
go
underway
without
there
being
the
you
know,
the
water
resources
or
other
resources
or
utilities
to
actually
sustain
the
full
build
out.
F
You
know,
particularly
with
water,
in
many
of
our
other
communities.
The
state
engineer
signs
off
on
subdivision
maps
to
make
sure
the
water
resources
are
available
here
in
southern
nevada.
The
water
authority
has
to
to
show
that
the
water
resources
are
available
before
building
permits
can
be
issued.
So
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
can,
if
proponents
could
speak
specifically
to
that,
can
secure
language
and
and
why
that
was
included.
G
Sure,
thank
you
for
the
question.
I
appreciate
you
asking
it
yeah.
G
Goed
will
be
the
determining
factor,
the
the
authorizing
entity,
but
our
assumption
on
that
is,
it
worked
exactly
as
you
just
discussed.
I
mean,
I
think
it's
rather
precedential
and
I
think
everybody
sort
of
understands,
regardless
of
jurisdiction,
how
water
and
development
are
indelibly
linked,
and
I
mean
it's,
you
know
formulaic.
If
you
will,
as
it
comes
to
permitting
of
how
much
water
is
needed
for
a
significant
development,
we
would
suspect
that
it
would
work
exactly
the
same
way.
I
mean
there's
a
practical
reality
to
this
right.
G
I
mean
you
can't
build
something
without
water,
from
a
standpoint
of
even
if
you,
even
if
you
wanted
to
it's,
it's
impossible
right,
and
so
one
sort
of
it
is
a
self-fulfilling
prophecy,
but
the
second
part
of
it,
I
think,
is
the
most
important
part.
We
realize
our
responsibility
not
just
to
the
water
sufficient
to
build
this
project.
G
The
very
essence
of
a
smart
city
is
that
this
would
this
project
would
use
a
small
fraction
of
all
natural
resources,
water
being
one
of
them
that
a
traditional
development
would
use.
So
the
amount
of
water
we'll
be
talking
about
by
nature
is
going
to
be
smaller
and
that's
a
good
thing
right,
because
the
innovations
that
will
be
made
in
water
and
waste
water
will
mean
that
a
lot
less
will
be
used.
G
The
footprint
will
be
smaller,
but
we
understand
the
responsibility
for
the
entire
region
in
in
northern
nevada,
especially
being
so
dependent
on
the
truckee
river
and
and
and
it
being
such
a
you
know,
subject
of
many
years
of
discussion
and
litigation
between
all
the
different
stakeholders
from
the
pyramid,
lake
tribe,
to
the
fallon
farmers,
and
you
know
the
reno
area
in
drinking
water.
We
clearly
understand
the
importance
of
this
the
importance
of
getting
this
right
and
getting
all
of
those
stakeholders
apart.
G
So
this
isn't
just
us
going
out
and
trying
to
find
water
deals
to
make
sure
we
can
check
a
box
that
then
we
have
some.
You
know
the
the
prerequisite
amount
in
acre
feet
to
build.
15
000
homes,
and
you
know
20
or
30
million
square
feet
of
of
commercial.
This
is
about
a
regional
water
solution
as
much
as
anything
in
the
course
of
the
last
three
or
four
months
have
afforded
us
the
opportunity
to
have
some
very
involved
conversations
with
a
number
of
the
stakeholders
to
move
that
forward.
G
I
would
suspect
that
you
would
hopefully
be
impressed
at
the
point
in
which
we
have
that
discussion
in
in
the
sequence
of
these
meetings
that
we're
talking
about
it
as
such,
that
it's
a
regional
water
solution,
understanding,
especially
in
this
base
that
you
know
the
truckee
river
is
sort
of
done.
I
mean
that
the
easy
stuff
is
done,
and
so
the
next
chapter
of
of
water
in
and
development
in
northern
nevada-
not
just
this
much
any
project-
is
going
to
have
to
deal
with
importation
and
that
importation
gets
everybody
involved.
G
And-
and
so
I
don't
see
this
being
anything
different.
In
fact,
I
think
that
it's
a
catalyst
of
some
of
those
things
you
know
earlier.
There
was
a.
There
was
a
comment
about
the
the
impact
on
the
infrastructure,
whether
it's
transportation
infrastructure
or
whatever.
We
were
vividly
aware
of
the
impact
this
would
have
and
we
look
at
it
whether
it's
from
the
existing
lands
bill,
whether
whether
it's
it's
regional
water
issues
that
this
becomes
part
of
making
the
infrastructure,
whether
it's
transportation
or
water,
in
the
entire
corridor
better.
G
F
Thank
you,
mr
arnott.
I
appreciate
the
detailed
response
because
it
and
complicated
response,
because
it's
a
complicated
issue
and
and
so
I
appreciate
that
you
respect
that,
and
I
know
that
I
think
we're
gonna.
F
I
assume
at
some
point
in
the
future
we'll
have
a
more
detailed
conversation
about
some
of
those
resource
issues,
so
I
don't
need
to
get
too
far
down
that
track
with
you,
but
I
do
think
in
terms
of
looking
specifically
at
the
policy
that
can
secure
language
would
be
something
that
we
want
to
circle
back
on
and
try
and
button
up
to
make
sure
that
we
that
there
is
no
way
that
the
cart
can
get
in
front
of
before
the
horse.
F
So
with
that,
I
do
have
a
couple
other
questions,
but
I'll
hold
and
see
what
other
members
have
as.
F
No,
I
appreciate
that,
and
you
know
my
main
thing
is:
I
want
to
make
sure
that
again
that,
under
this
language,
that
we
can't
have
a
scenario
where
there
may
be
water
rights,
but
there
isn't
actually
a
conveyance
method,
and
so
that
we've
permitted
the
zone
and
it
begins
moving
down
the
process,
but
but
that
water
can't
actually
get
to
the
site,
for
example.
So
that's
why
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up
that
issue
that
we
that
may
need
to
be
tightened
up
with
the
language.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
A
I
appreciate
that
and
we
will
be
having
on
future
agendas
where
we
talk
about
kind
of
the
impacts
and
the
regional
considerations
we'll
make
sure
that
there
is.
I,
I
imagine,
going
to
be
a
very
healthy
conversation
about
water,
because
when
you
know
when
we
talk
about
water,
our
ears
all
perk
up,
because
we
are
good
nevadans
who
care
about
our
resources
that
way-
and
we
know
they're
scarce.
A
So
I
appreciate
the
questions
on
that
and
we
will
definitely
be
doing
a
deeper
dive
going
forward
on
other
when
we
come
to
future
agenda
items,
the
assemblyman
o'neill.
C
C
The
innovation
zone
gets
approval
from
goed
to
set
itself
up,
it
gives
its
master
plan
or
general
plan,
and
then
they
can
amend
it
after
that.
If
I
understand
correctly,
there
is
no
more
oversight,
so
they
can
submit
whatever
they
want
to
go
with
get
approval
and
then
later
on
change
it
to
what
they
may
have
really
wanted,
or
without
any
oversight
on
it.
If
is
that,
my
understanding,
correct.
H
This
is
allison
combs
for
the
record
under
section
19.
The
board
does
have
the
authority
to
amend
the
general
plan,
but
there
are
restrictions
on
that
within
the
statute.
C
H
Well,
broadly
speaking,
is
on
board
with
this
issue
or
anything
else.
They
remain
public
officers
who
have
to
follow
the
requirements
of
their
office
and
they
are
required
to
follow
the
the
plan
and
the
requirements
of
the
chapter
of
nrs
and
everything
will
be
done
as
required
under
wrestle
transparently
and
if
there
are
any
concerns
in
that
area.
There
are
opportunities
in
the
future
to
be
addressed
legislatively
as
well.
B
C
G
Sure
well,
and
I
appreciate
that-
I
think
that
it's
really
important
to
un
to
understand
that
every
underlying
statute
that
regulates
every
single
county
in
the
state,
whether
it's
244
281.
What
have
you
still
applies
to
the
innovations
right?
So
every
county
of
this
state
is
a
creature
of
the
state.
We
all
understand
that
they'll
understand
how
the
rules
work.
G
C
G
It's
not
unique
in
so
much
that
all
regulatory
and
pertinent
statutes
that
that
govern
carson
city
douglas
county
clark,
county
washoe
county.
What
have
you
will
govern
the
innovation
zone
going
forward
too?
So
there's
no
lack
of
oversight
at
all.
C
K
I
had
the
opportunity
yesterday
to
go
out
to
tri
and
and
to
see
the
area
that
would
be
innovation
zones
and
just
talk
to
them
about
some
of
the
issues
and
one
of
the
issues
I
was
also
concerned
about
was
water,
and
I
learned
yesterday
when
I
was
out
there
that
there
is
anything
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
they
said
there
is
about
20
years
worth
of
water
under
the
blockchain's
land,
and
so
my
concern
is
okay.
So
we
have
20
years
of
water,
what
happens
after
the
20
years.
K
So
I'm
glad
we're
going
to
have
a
further
conversation
about
water,
because
I
think
we
can't
just
think
about
right
now.
We
have
to
also
think
about
the
future,
and
I'm
also
a
bit
concerned
about
the
infrastructure
needs
that
for
the
county,
as
if
this
were
to
happen
and
the
cost
for
those
infrastructure
needs
and
who
would
pay
for
those
infrastructure
needs,
and
if
you
could
address
that
a
bit
I'd
appreciate
it.
G
Sure
to,
and
through
you
to
senator
lang
when
you're
talking
about
the
infrastructure,
are
you
talking
about
infrastructure
for
the
innovation
zone
or
infrastructure
needed
by
the
the
county?
They
would
be
exiting.
K
Well,
I'm
thinking
about
roads-
and
you
know
you're
going
to
get
increased
traffic
on
the
road,
so
who's
going
to
pay
to
add
lanes
to
the
road
or
put
new
roads
in
it's.
My
understanding
that
the
innovation
zone
will
pay
for
their
own
needs
within
their
own
community,
but
that
community
and
when
you
increase
the
houses,
you
increase
the
needs
for
fire.
You
increase
the
need
for
other
things
and
I'm
just
wondering
who
would
be
responsible
to
cover
those
costs.
G
Well
within,
thank
you
for
the
question
inside
the
innovation
zone
itself.
They
would
be
responsible
for
covering
all
costs
of
their
own
infrastructure,
whether
that's
law
enforcement,
fire
protection,
roads
transportation
operates
just
like
any
other
county
they
have
to.
They
have
to
build
that,
and
probably
you
know
realistically
at
the
front
end,
the
developer
is
going
to
have
to
cover.
G
You
know
a
large
portion
of
that
until
the
transition
is
made
to
where
your
tax
revenue
with
its
property
tax
revenue
sales
tax,
have
you
flows
to
the
innovation
zone
as
long
as
story
county
is
providing
those
services
this
the
tax
revenue
stays
the
story
count.
I
think
allison
was
very
clear
about
that
is
keeping
that
county
hole.
G
Not
only
that,
but,
of
course,
there's
there's
a
payment
in
perpetuity
of
property
tax
going
forward
even
after
the
services
have
have
ended,
but
as
far
as
the
the
regional
impact
or
the
greater
regional
impact
outside
of
the
in
innovation
zone,
the
way
that
we've
thought
about
that
and
that's
obviously
the
subsequent
bill
in
the
tax
for
taxing
the
technology
itself
is
going
to
also
talk
about
distribution
and
that's
been
obviously
a
very
almost
sore
subject
in
front
of
the
legislature
depending
on
you
know,
existing
issues
back
to
when
I
was
in
the
legislature
between
eureka
and
elko
county
of
the
impacts
on
one
county.
G
Where
would
the
workers
lived
versus
where
the
tax
revenue
went
in
the
where
the
mines
existed?
It
right
now
between
story,
county
and
washoe
county,
of
course,
there's
an
ongoing.
You
know
concern
between
the
existing
impacts
that
exist
now,
with
the
you
know,
wonderful
and
successful
development.
That's
been
done
at
tri,
so
we're
very
cognizant
of
that
impact
going
forward
and
the
idea
would
be
in
the
distribution
of
the
taxes
on
the
technology
itself
that
it
would
be
divided
in
a
couple
of
different
ways.
G
One
would
be
a
distribution
to
all
17
counties
to
understand
that,
and
that
would
be
25
of
the
overall
revenue
would
go
to
all
17
counties
in
obviously
attempt
to
address
the
impacts
of
the
entire
state.
But,
as
importantly
to
your
question,
the
other
25
of
that
would
go
to
the
adjoining
counties,
which,
in
this
case,
would
be
lion,
washoe
and
story
to
deal
with.
All
of
those
sorts
of
things
there's
been
a
number
of
different
ways.
G
G
That
was
just
our
id
and
that's
one
of
the
eight
additions
that
have
been
drafted
that
we're
going
to
talk
about
in
detail
is
the
tax
distribution,
but
we
want
this
to
be
something
that
addresses
those
impacts
and
gives
each
of
those
counties
the
freedom
to
do
with
that
money
as
they
will
and
and
and
deal
with
what
impacts,
be
they
social
or
infrastructure,
based
that
they
feel
are
priorities
for
their
own
counties.
But
I
think
that
gives
an
opportunity
to
deal
with
it
in
a
very,
very
fair
way.
G
G
It's
also
important
to
understand
that
part
of
the
reason
that
those
impacts
are
created
is
because
of
lack
of
housing,
just
understanding
that
this
project
builds
15,
000
households,
and
so
that
the
idea
that
people
would
work
here
but
live
somewhere
else,
so
the
tax
money
would
go
to
one
county,
but
the
services
would
be
would
be
provided
by
the
county
where
everybody
lives
is
not
the
case
here,
because
we're
providing
and
building
adequate
housing
for
the
entirety
of
the
development,
and
so
that
basic
impact
hopefully,
is
much
much
less
than
what
exists
today.
A
All
right,
I've
got
a
question
and
then
we'll
go
into
opening
it
up
for
follow-up
questions
from
members
with
additional
questions
that
you
might
have,
so
we've
got
kind
of
the
different
phases
of
what
would
be
a
you
know.
Kind
of
decades-long
of
you
know
this
legislation
kind
of
playing
out
over
a
series
of
decades
right.
So
I
wanted
to
get
an
idea
of
time
frame
kind
of
how
long
you
imagine
each
phase
running
its
course
before
another
phase
starts
right.
A
So
I
you
know
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
I,
but
I
kind
of
essentially
have
four
phases.
One
is
the
application
phase
in
which
you're
establishing
the
innovation
zone
second
is
going
to
be,
while
the
board
is
being
run
by
the
board
of
supervisors
and
then
you've
got
your
hundred
residents
criteria
in
there
and
then
the
change
to
when
the
innovation
zone
would
assume
all
duties
and
then
the
assumption
that
that's
how
once
you
get
to
that
point,
that's
how
you
would
maintain
going
forward.
A
We've
heard
some
different
time
frames
that
this
would
take
50
or
70
years
to
come
to
fruition.
So
could
you
kind
of
walk
through
what
you
see
over
the
next
few
decades,
these
different
pieces
of
legislation
coming
into
effect
effect
as
the
innovation
zones
concept
moves
through
from
application
to
assumption
of
all
powers.
G
Sure-
and
I
don't
know
jeremy,
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
take
this
from
the
underlying
assumptions
in
the
economic
development
plan
or
you'd
like
me
to
take
it
from
the
sort
of
planning
and
development
side
of
this.
I
You
know
either
way
is
fine.
I
mean
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
just
talk
about
some
of
the
application
process
at
the
front.
End
chair,
benitez
thompson,
there's
no
doubt
that
the
the
extension
over
the
development
time
horizon
is
relatively
extensive.
You
know
that
you're
talking
about
building
out
a
master
plan
community,
roughly
the
size
of
summerlin
right.
I
So
you
know
that's
going
to
be
a
decades-long
exercise
that
having
been
said,
you
know,
I
think
the
question
you
ask
is
a
very
important
one
right
I
mean
how
long
does
the
application
process
take
at
the
front?
I
Then
there
are
some
pretty
specific
timelines
in
that
application
process
from
the
time
that
it
gets
received
essentially
60
days
to
be
reviewed,
and
then
those
type
of
things
right
that
application
process
is
going
to
obviously
be
very
critical
as
a
critical
path
issue,
you
then
sort
of
have
the
first
phase
of
operations
right
is,
the
infrastructure
is
being
put
in
as
the
backbone
of
the
community
is
being
developed
before
you
sort
of
elect
to
provide
services.
I
Before
you
have
a
lot
of
cis
and
allison's
presentation,
I
think
she
alluded
to
the
fact
that
that
could
be
measured
in
years.
Do
I
know
here
telling
you
maybe
pete
has
better
insight
than
I
do
about
whether
that's
you
know
two
years
or
five
years.
I
think
that's
very
difficult
to
sort
of
discern,
because
you're
talking
about
building
out
a
significant
amount
of
infrastructure
and
building
all
of
that
around
it
beyond
that.
I
think
then
you're
in
to
the
actual
development
of
the
community
phase
right.
I
This
sort
of,
maybe
I'm
mixing
two
phases
that
you
brought
up,
madam
chair,
as
opposed
to
one
but
you're
talking
about
all
of
the
phase
in
terms
of
that
that
that
sort
of
full-fledged
development
providing
services
building
out
a
city-
and
I
think
that
phase
will
outlive
all
of
us
right.
The
whole
idea
here
is
to
build
a
community
from
the
ground
up
entirely
different
than
what
we've
seen
previously
and
in
doing
that,
allow
for
it
to
last
into
perpetuity.
I
Now
from
that
standpoint,
so
pete,
I
don't
know
if
I
hit
on
all
the
phases
or
madam
chair.
If
you
want
me
to
sort
of
dig
into
it
more
deeply
from
how
we
evaluated
it
from
an
economic
impact
standpoint,
because
we
did
have
pretty
defined
sort
of
timelines
in
order
to
make
assumptions
relative
to
that.
But,
madam
chair,
I
don't
want
to
leave
you
with
the
impression
that
those
are
somehow
etched
in
stone
because
I
just
don't
think
that's
the
way.
It'll
actually
work.
A
You
have
an
an
area
with
an
appointed
board
and
but
you
don't
reach
the
resident
one
threshold,
for
maybe
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know
if
we're
operating
under
board
of
supervisors
for
appointed
board
of
supervisors
for
five
years
for
10
years
or
15
years,
or
whether
you
imagine
you
know
the
the
goal
is
going
to
be
to
get
your
100
residents
in
there
in
within
seven
years,
and
then
you
you're,
switching
from
that
elected
board
to
or
from
the
appointed
board
to
the
elected
board,
and
then
that
elected
board
you
know
operating
and
taking
two
decades
before
they
would
do
an
assumption
of
all
duties.
A
So
that's
I
I.
It
was
kind
of
more
general
like
in
this,
knowing
that
this
is
kind
of
decades.
What
might
we
in
nevada
expect
to
see
as
the
centrals?
I
don't
imagine
we're
going
to
be
at
assumption
of
all
duties
within
a
decade
just
because
it
it
seems
to
be,
but
we
might
be.
I
don't
know,
I
guess
that's
what
I'm
asking
for.
Just
as
I,
as
I
hold
the
thought
in
my
head.
A
G
The
application
is
either
approved
to
deny
if
it's
approved,
then
the
initial
three
board
members
are
appointed
by
the
governor,
and
I
would
suspect
that
the
next
move
would
be
towards
the
commercial
development,
because
obviously
the
commercial
development
and
the
success
of
the
commercial
development
is
gonna
drive
as
much
of
the
idea
how
big
the
infrastructure
needs
to
be
in
the
smart
city
right,
they're
they're,
you
know
indelibly
linked
as
they
are
in
any.
You
know
multi-phase
development
like
that,
so
I
would
imagine
that
the
commercial
development
would
precede
the
residential
development.
C
G
L
G
Like
there's
going
to
be
a
hundred
people,
just
sort
of
show
up
one
day
and
we
you
know-
I
mean
the
houses
have
to
be
built.
It
all
has
to
be
planned
by
the
developer,
and
so
you
know
we
would
be
very
eager
for
the
residential
portion
to
begin
and
the
threshold
of
the
100
registered
voters
to
begin
because
once
it
functions
like
every
other
county,
there's,
never
any
disconnection
between
the
ability
to
tax
the
ability
to
administer
public
money
from
an
appointed
board
versus
an
elected
board.
G
That's
why
the
threshold
is
set
so
low
and
at
a
hundred
voters
is
we're
eager
to
get
into
that
position
as
well.
But
you
know,
I
would
suspect
that
before
a
shovel
goes
in
the
ground
that
we're
anywhere
in
the
neighborhood
of
of
three
plus
years
before
you
know
this,
this
begins
just
out
of
again
the
enormity
of
this
project,
all
the
planning
that
it
takes
as
jeremy
talked
about.
This
is
the
size
of
summerlin,
and
so
the
planning
phase
of
this
is
going
to
be.
G
A
And
I
think
a
lot
of
the
the
the
public
dialogue
has
kind
of
been
focused
on
at
least
from
my
perception
is
that
you
would
get
to
kind
of
the
board
of
supervisors
where
you
have
a
board
of
three,
two
of
which
are
coming
from
the
proposed
applicant
and
then
you've
got
commercial
development.
And
so
I
guess
that's
why
part
of
the
reason
I
was
asking.
A
G
Spot
on
that,
that
is
sort
of
the
essence
of
the
concern
and
controversy.
What
you
know
before
you
even
get
to
the
idea
of
an
autonomous
government
is
the
the
the
challenge
here
is
from
day
one
going
forward
right.
We
had
to
start
with
the
idea
that
no
one
lives
there
right.
So
how
do
you?
How
do
you
start
it
from
from
from
scratch
right
now?
G
The
idea
of
having
three
board
members
appointed
in
two
coming
from
a
list
from
the
developer,
but
that
cannot
have,
pursuant
to
this
builder,
any
peculiar
interest
in
the
development
whatsoever.
They
can't
be
a
an
employee,
any
of
those
sorts
of
things
that
actually
has
presence.
That's
that's
sort
of
how
redevelopment
areas
are
done
now,
so
this
isn't
something
we
just
created
out
of
a
whole
cloth.
There
is
precedent
in
other,
you
know
special
improvement
districts
or
redevelopment
districts
to
do
it
exactly
this
way
in
in
that
in
that
transition
period.
G
G
So
there
so
everybody's
properly
motivated
to
move
to
that
phase,
because
until
there's
tax
dollars
coming
in
the
investors
and
and
the
developer
is
sort
of
the
sole
source
of
revenue
other
than
some.
You
know,
building
fees
and
and
and
some
of
those
things
that
they'd
have
the
authorization
to
do,
which
would
be
obviously
small
potatoes
compared
to
to
all
the
infrastructure.
That
sort
of
senator
lang
had
asked
about
so
everybody's
motivated
to
move
from
the
transition
period
to
the
elected
board
for
a
number
of
different
reasons.
A
So
I
guess,
knowing
that
this
is
thinking
about
that
in
a
different
way.
Is
there
a
vision,
even
kind
of
generally
for
the
public
about
what
benchmarks
we
should
be
looking
for
over
the
course
of
of
that
10
years
to
know
that
that
this
project
is
on
track
is
in
the
way
it's
being
talked
about
and
proposed
today.
I
Madam
chair,
thank
you
for
the
question
and,
and
I
I
think
it's
it's
dead
on
relative
to
to
the
issue
right
sort
of
two
things
number
one.
The
first
part
of
the
question
is:
there's
no
clawback,
because
there's
nothing
that
the
state
is
sort
of
putting
in
right
there's.
There
are
no
incentives
here,
there's
nothing
to
sort
of
take
back,
but
I
think
that
the
reporting
requirements
that
are
included
in
the
legislation
as
they
currently
exist
are
as
robust
as
just
about
anything
that
you
would
see
right.
What
is
it
that
the?
I
What
is
it
that
the
public
can
expect
to
see?
I
think
it's
the
investments
making
their
way
in
it's
the
it's,
the
the
placement
of
the
infrastructure,
that's
being
set
up
and
put
into
place
it's
the
application
process
to
go
through.
Remember
that
as
part
of
that
application
process,
they
have
to
provide
a
master
plan
around
all
of
that
right.
This
is
what
we're
going
to
build,
and
that
includes
how
we're
going
to
go
about
building
it,
making
sure
that
all
the
financial
elements
are
put
in
place.
I
Those
type
of
things
every
one
of
those
hurdles
that
you'd
have
in
a
traditional
master
plan
community
would
be
there
beyond
that.
You
also
have
the
hurdles
that
would
come
from
the
establishment
of
government
services
themselves.
You
talked
before
about
these
sort
of
major
hurdles
that
are
part
of
the
establishment,
the
board
of
supervisors
being
appointed.
You
know
those
type
of
things
hitting
that
first
hundred
people
all
of
those
type
of
things.
I
I
think
every
one
of
those
public
and
private
elements
would
come
together
to
provide
a
very
meaningful
timeline
to
demonstrate
that
it's
that
way
that
they
are
making
progress
and
beyond
that,
the
concept
of
having
to
have
this
relatively
robust
reporting
should
add
to
that.
Madam
chair,
I'm
going
to
apologize
in
advance,
it
doesn't
matter
what
I
do.
I'm
at
my
office,
these
guys
don't
come
around
to
to,
I
don't
know,
trim
the
trees
outside
my
door
unless
I'm
on
a
conference
call.
So
forgive
me
for
that.
I
apologize.
A
It's
okay.
I
have
horrible
hearing.
I
can't
actually
hear
any
of
your
background
sounds
so
whatever
you
apologize
for.
I
can't
hear
it
anyways
all
right.
Okay,
so
committee
members,
additional
questions
that
you
you
have
senator
dennis.
C
Thank
you.
I
think
these
are
a
couple
quick
ones,
one
in
in
part
of
the
presentation
it
was
discussed.
I
think
in
the
phase
of
talking
about.
I
just
remember
the
the
phrase
any
local
government
to
provide
services.
Could
somebody
talk
a
little
bit
about
that
it
just
kind
of
caught
my
attention
that
you
know
if
they
needed
some
services,
they
could
go
to
any
local
government
in
nevada.
H
Under
under
the
bill
and
I'll
start
and
feel
free
to
jump
in,
but
the
the
county
can
establish
the
offices,
it
can
create
the
offices,
it
can
consolidate.
Offices
like
clerk
and
recorder
or
it
can
go
into
a
cooperative
agreement
with
another
local
government
say
you
know
in
a
nearby
local
government
to
provide
those
services.
So
it
would
be
under
a
cooperative
agreement
that
they
would
would
contract
for
those
services.
C
It
wouldn't
necessarily
be
just
anything
that's
close
by
they
could
attract
with
any
local
government
in
the
state
of
nevada
right.
H
Yes,
and
I
should
say,
the
duties
of
the
office
is
what
and
they
could
contract,
as
you
said,
with
any
other
local
government
in
in
nevada
to
to
do
duties.
The
office,
okay,.
G
G
As
you
know,
too,
I
just
just
so
everybody
sort
of
understands
the
underlying
premise
of
an
interlocal
agreement.
It's
contract
right,
no
one's
forced
to
produce
the
services
without
proper
revenue,
and
so
an
interlocal
agreement
has
to
be
a
willing
provider
and
a
willing
payer.
So
the
local
agreements
would
by
default
best
interest
with
both
parties
or
they
wouldn't
of
course,
agree.
C
To
them
right,
but
there's
nothing
in
there.
That
says
that
the
the
county
they're
in
would
have
the
first
opportunity
to
provide
the
service
I
mean
they
could
just
they
could
basically
go
to
whoever
gives
them
the
best
deal
right.
G
Well,
I
I,
I
guess,
I
think,
there's
probably
some
practical
limitations
to
that.
Just
from
a
geographic
example,
I
mean
look
if,
if
here's
a
practice,
let's
ultimately
innovation
zone
when
it
came
to
schools,
would
you
know
prefer
that
the
kids
that
live
there
still
go
to
the
store
to
story
county
schools?
Well,
then,
the
money
that
goes
to
story
county
schools
to
provide
that
service
would
remain
the
same
if
they
decided
to
contract
with
fire
protection
from
washoe
county
they'd
have
to
deal
with.
G
You
know
with
the
interlocal
agreement
with
washoe
county.
You
know
obviously
entering
into
a
local
agreement
about
providing
fire
services
from
the
county.
Hundreds
of
miles
away
just
wouldn't
work
right.
So
I
think
there's
a
practical
limitation
to
a
number
of
those.
C
C
You
may
have
already
kind
of
talked
about
this,
but
you
know
we're
talking
about
innovation
zones,
and
some
of
this
stuff
is
going
to
take
a
long
time
to
to
get
up
and
running
and,
as
we
know,
technology
doesn't
wait
for
things
to
get
set
up.
It
just
keeps
going
so
I
mean
when
they
originally
might
get
set
up
for
certain
technology,
but
within
10
years
that
technology
could
be.
You
know
they
could
have
moved
on.
So
what's
the
I
guess,
the
thought
process
and
all
of
that.
G
Great
question,
so
I
would
like
this
I
mean
I
part
of
the
of
this
is
to
understand,
and
I
know
that
you
certainly
do
senator
and-
and
I
think
the
committee
members
as
a
whole
understand
that
the
blockchain
technology,
the
reason
we
talk
about
it
as
the
most
important
emerging
technology
of
the
future-
is
that
there's
so
many
other
technologies
and
applications
that
are
made
better
or
run
off
of
the
foundation
of
blockchain
technology.
G
The
best
way
to
think
about
it
to
the
layman
is
if
blockchains
was
windows
that
all
of
these
other
things
you
know
ai
and
and
robotics
and
nanotechnology,
and
even
cryptocurrency
a
lot
of
those
things
become,
like
you
know,
word
or
excel
they're,
just
an
application
that
run
off
of
or
become
made
better,
more
secure,
more
independent
by
blockchain
technology.
So
we
believe
that
blockchain
technology
becomes
the
common
thread,
but
really
the
applications
to
it
are
limitless.
G
And
so
by
that
it's
almost
I
mean
there's
there's
those
in
the
in
this
world
that
believe
that
the
development
of
the
blockchain
technology
is
metaphorically
exactly
the
same
as
the
internet
itself.
It's
going
to
be
that
sort
of
monumental
going
forward,
and
so
we
believe
that
the
associated
technologies
that
are
developed
in
in
in
association
with
blockchain
are
are
so
limitless
that
the
content
available
to
this
innovation
zone
and
they'll
be
incubated
and
created.
G
This
innovation
zone
are
or
equally
limitless
the
thing
about
blockchain
technology
right
now
is:
there's
no
destination,
it's
sort
of
everywhere
and
and
there's
there's
there's
little.
You
know
places
in
the
world
that
try
to
gain
a
foothold.
The
point
of
this
is
to
have
a
bricks
and
mortar
destination,
that
is
the
global
leader
in
the
development
of
blockchain
technology
and
all
of
those
related
technologies.
So
we
believe
the
content
will
far
outlive
any
of
us.
C
Well-
and
I
and
I
appreciate
that
I
I
I
realized
that
you
know
especially
with
the
blocked
blockchains,
but
the
legislation
talks
about
other
technologies
that
could
that
could
qualify
for
this
and
some
of
those
aren't
quite
the
same
as
blockchain
in
that
they,
it
may
or
may
be
superseded
much
quicker
than
like
a
blockchain.
G
G
This
is
written
as
a
general
law
right
and
and,
and
so
another
innovation
zone
can
be
done.
So
I
think
it's
important
to
read
eligibility
requirements
and
their
totality.
It's
not
just
the
emerging
technology.
They
have
to
have
the
50
000
acres.
They
have
to
have
the
250
million
dollars
of
initial
investment
and
the
you
know
the
agreement
of
a
billion
dollars
over
10
years.
G
They
have
to
agree
to
a
attacks
on
the
underlying
technology,
and
so
all
of
those
things
in
totality
come
to
the
legislature,
no
matter
how
you
slice,
if
there's
five
other
opportunities
to
do
an
innovation
zone
in
our
lifetime,
the
innovate
that
the
legislature
gets
to
say
yes
or
no,
and
with
that
underlying
tax.
That
means
the
highest
possible
filter
is
placed
on
the
approval,
which
is
a
two-thirds
major.
A
two-thirds
majority
by
practicality
has
to
say
yes
to
any
innovation
of
this
one
or
any
subsequent
innovation
zones
in
the
future.
A
Sorry,
mr
not
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
two-thirds
comment
just
to
make
sure
that
I'm
I'm
I'm
understanding
right,
because
so
the
the
the
proposedly
legislation,
as
we
see
it
to
allow
for
the
establishment
of
an
innovation
zone
is
not
a
two-thirds
vote
requirement.
So
I
guess,
when
you
say
going
forward
at
some
point,
that
there
would
be
a
two-thirds,
what
I
guess,
what
what
triggers
that.
G
So
one
of
the
one
of
the
basic
eligibility
requirements
to
be
an
innovation
zone
is
that
and
that
this
is
in
this
bill
that
you
have
to
have
a
tax
established
on
the
underlying
technology
and
so
actually
wasn't
implemented
by
the
legislature
by
two-thirds.
You
wouldn't
be
eligible
to
be
an
invasion,
so
this
bill
itself
isn't
a
two-thirds
bill,
but
in
all
practicality
it
is
because
if
the
tax
wasn't
passed,
you
could
never
be
eligible
to
pursuant
to
this
bill
and
you
never
become
an
innovation.
A
So
could
there
be
a
situation
where
the
application
and
the
zone
gets
approved,
but
then
the
specialized
industry,
specific
tax
could
not
be
approved
or
those
or
that's
is
this
written
in
a
way
that
that
could
not
be
a
reality
and
that's
in
section
13,
and
I
guess
once
again
so
we're
so
we
don't
lose
the
public
and
where
we're
talking
about
what
be
sure
to
cite
your
sections
like
so
I'm
section,
13
h,
is
the
industry
specific
tax.
A
But
also
in
the
the
rest
of
the
section
is
that
you
know
that
once
the
application
is
submitted
that
it
shall
be
approved.
So
I
guess.
H
If
I
may,
madam
chair,
under
the
section
that
you're
looking
at
sub
a
paragraph
f
or
excuse
me
h
under
the
industry
specific
tax,
there
is
language
in
there
that
specifically
says
that
if
the
tax
or
fee
is
not
in
existence
at
the
time
of
the
application,
approval
of
the
creation
of
the
zone
is
contingent
upon
enactment
of
the
tax
or
fee.
A
A
All
right
additional
questions
from
committee
members.
J
C
Thank
you.
It
would
not
be
two-thirds
bill
because
the
the
bill
itself
would
not
impose
the
tax.
The
tax
would
have
to
be
imposed
by
subsequent
action
by
another
body.
So
not
while
the
legislature
would
be
authorizing
that
action,
the
legislature
would
not
be
imposing
the
tax
attacks
would
in
fact
be
imposed
by
a
another
entity.
C
The
if
the,
if
the
legislature
considered
a
bill
to
impose
the
industry
specific
tax,
that
that
bill
would
be
the
two
thirds
the
bill
to
impose
the
industry.
Specific
tax
would
be
two-thirds.
J
I
appreciate
that
so
much
like
when
we're
dealing
with
sending
to
the
counties
the
authority
to
raise
a
particular
tax.
This
is
the
same
way
since
that
governing
authority
be
the
one
raising
the
tax.
It
falls
to
the
just
the
majority
vote
and
then
the
governing
body
has
the
decision
by
a
majority
vote
to
implement,
said
tax
or
fee
correct
right.
J
J
That
being
said,
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
reading
in
this
bill,
if
I
could
just
get
clarification
from
someone
is,
it
seems
as
if
to
me
that
story
county,
which
I
do
represent,
would
somewhat
be
a
provider
of
last
resort.
If
this
entity
decided
that
they
wanted
the
children
or
the
sewer
or
whatever
to
be
administered
by
story,
county
story
county
would
have
to
do
so
well.
J
The
entity
would
have
the
right
to
instead
change
its
mind
in
contract,
with,
let's
say
lyon
county,
to
send
the
children
to
school
there
or
to
do
it
virtually
again,
as
senator
dennis
alluded
to
online,
with
a
different
group
you
know
from
wherever
or
if
they
wish
they
could
contract
and
bust
their
children
to
washoe
county
but
story
county
in
essence,
though,
would
be
the
provider
of
last
resort
for
services
and
would
have
to
do
it
at
the
election
of
the
entity.
Am
I
correct
or
destroyed
county?
Have
the
right
to
say.
H
No
I'll
start
with
all
stardom
and
other
members,
you
kind
of
want
to
jump
in
in
the
initial
phase
when
it's
just
getting
started
out.
The
a
tax
or
fee
supporting
all
of
those
services
is
with
story
county
and
the
duty
to
provide
the
services
and
the
tax
revenue
all
stay
with
the
county.
H
So
I'm
not
sure
if
I'm
answering
your
question
well
or
but
but
once
the
zone
assumes
that
duty,
it
stays
with
the
zone.
J
I
appreciate
the
answer
I
think
you're
confirming
what
I'm
saying.
Thank
you
now.
I
have
many
other
questions,
but
I'm
not
going
to
bring
them
up
at
this
time.
I
think
some
of
the
questions
will
probably
come
up
from
other
presentations
or
we'll
get
them
offline.
I
look
forward
to
seeing
amendments
that
were
offered
in
the
past
and
things
of
that
nature.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
G
Senator
just
just
real
quickly,
just
to
make
sure
we're
on
the
same
page
as
it
comes
to
providing
services
from
the
legacy
county
from
story
county
again.
The
the
services
and
revenues
are
never
separate,
so
any
services
that
would
stay
with
story
county
also
would
stay
with
the
commensurate
revenue
to
cover
the
services.
G
If
those
services
in
subsequent
years
were
something
that
the
innovation
zone
would
like
story
county
to
provide,
it
would
only
be
done
from
the
interlocal
agreement
that
story
county
would
have
to
agree
to
so
there's
never
either
a
forced
issue
of
providing
the
service,
but
any
service
that
never
transitions
from
story.
Count
in
that
instance
to
innovation
zone
also
would
stay
with
the
remaining
revenue
to
story
county
and
that's,
of
course,
over
and
above
the
way
that
the
bill
is
written
in
which
the
payments
go
into
story
county
in
perpetuity.
G
After
all,
services
have
a
transition.
J
I
appreciate
that
answer,
mr
not.
However,
I
think
the
language
within
the
bill
says
if
they
elect
to
do
so,
so
if
the
innovation
zone
elects
to
do
so,
I
guess
what
I'm
indicating
is
that
from
my
reading
for
the
bill
story,
county
never
has
the
decision
to
elect
to
do
so.
They
have
a
requirement,
and
I
understand
what
you're
indicating
I'm
just
a
little
concerned
with
that
it
seems
to
be
a
one-way
street.
In
my
opinion,
so
I'm
just
having
a
discussion
about.
J
G
Simple
answer
is
yes,
would
we
have
that
discussion?
Of
course
we,
you
know
it's
it's
incredibly
important
to
us.
That
story
county
through
all
of
this
is
made
whole
and
even
better
than
hopefully
again
with
the
perpetuity
of
the
property
tax
payments.
But
yes,
we
absolutely
don't
want
to
provide
an
unfunded
mandate
to
story
county
in
any
way.
So
there's
an
issue
senator
especially
this
institute
district.
If
there's
an
issue
there,
absolutely
we
want
to
solve
that.
F
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair,
for
allowing
me
a
couple
more
questions.
I
have
a
couple.
Hopefully
I'll,
keep
them.
Quick
first
is
in
section
15,
there's
the
kind
of
one-year
look
back
where
certain
designations
or
actions
could
be
voided
after
the
zone
is
approved.
Can
you
just
explain
why
that
provision
was
included
and
contemplated.
H
Well,
yeah
the
restriction
on
a
year
look
back
in
the
year
prior
to
the
application,
there's
likely
an
awareness
that
an
application
such
as
this
may
be
forthcoming,
given
the
magnitude
of
the
development
of
the
land
involved
and
for
any
unexpected
actions
or
actions
placing
encumbrances
on
that
proposed
area
in
a
disadvantaged
way.
You
know
on
this
undeveloped
and
uninhabited
land.
H
F
Okay,
so
essentially
the
concern
is
that
there
might
be
decisions
that
would
tamper
with
the
innovation
zone's
development
in
that
year,
and
so
this
would
give
the
zone
once
approved
the
ability
to
look
back
at
those
and
avoid
any
that
it
finds
contradictory
to
to
the
plan
and
the
application.
H
F
Okay,
thank
you.
The
next
question
I
have
is
really
about
section
22
as
we're
looking
at
the
gradual
assumption
of
duties.
I
have
a
few
questions
in
this
area.
I
guess
a
couple
of
logistical
questions.
F
First
of
all,
I
guess-
and
this
also
deals
with
section
23.,
so
it
discusses
a
30-day
notice
under
section
22,
when
an
individual
service
or
duty
is
being
assumed
or
office,
and
then,
when
total
assumption
happens,
there's
a
90-day
notice
period
and
I
was
just
wondering
how
those
timelines
were
arrived
at
and
if,
if
that
would
be,
you
know
considered
adequate
not
only
for
the
zone,
who
obviously
would
have
a
plan,
I'd
assume
to
assume
those
duties,
but
also
for
the
county
that
they'd
be
assuming
them
from
to
provide.
F
H
The
three
days
notice,
as
you
pointed
out,
is
for
an
individual
service
or
duty
or
office
to
take
over.
So
it's
one
particular
component,
and
so
I
think
the
30
days
was
the
number
selected
thinking
that
that
would
provide
notice
for
the
transfer
for
that
one
service,
a
month,
long
period
of
time
to
to
make
that
transfer
the
90
days
notice.
From
april
1st
is
under
section
23
from
april
1st
to
the
start
of
the
fiscal
year.
That's
the
full
90
days
to
give
them
time
to
transition
from
this
man.
H
This
is
this
permissive
period
into
the
full
mandatory
period
and
starting
on
that
fiscal
year
time
to
shift
anything
else
that
has
not
yet
been
shifted.
Very
most
of
it
may
have
already
been
shifted
at
this
point,
but
that
will
give
them
90
days
to
transition
and
then
starting
on
july,
1st
is
when
the
zone
board
will
take
over
it's
the
start
of
a
fiscal
year.
So
that's
the
time
certain
for
those
periods,
that's
the
thought
process.
F
Thank
you
and
then
just
digging
in
on
something
I
stated
in
asking
that
question.
Is
there
an
assumption
that
some
of
the
associated
data
would
be
transferred
from
the
the
county
to
the
innovation
zone,
for
example
voter
records?
In
the
case
of
once
the
elections
happen
or
or
other
relevant?
You
know,
assessment
records
or
other
things.
Is
there
an
assumption
that
you
know
once
that
notice
is
given
that
the
local
government
must
provide
kind
of
the
information
that
they
have
to
the
zone
to
help
them,
with
the
assumption
of
that
duty.
H
I
think
yes,
I
mean
the
30
that
is
yeah
when
you
have
that
time
frame
that
the
associated
information
that
associated
with
that
office
that
appropriately,
would
be
transferred
under
existing
nrs
with
any
other
requirements,
transparency,
confidentiality,
everything-
would
be
transferred
appropriately
during
those
time
frames
and
I'll
invite
any
of
the
members
of
the
panel
to
expand
on
that.
If
they'd
like
to
as
well.
G
But
there
is
a
scenario
by
which
the
elections
you
know
they
may
they
may
contract
with
story
county
to
operate
those
elections
rather
than
perform
them
themselves
again.
Another
interlocal
agreement,
that's
a
service
just
like
fire
protection
or
any
other
service,
and
so
in
that
circumstance
I
think
the
data
would
have
to
be.
G
You
know
shared,
of
course,
because
this,
if
story
county
is
administering
it,
they
would
need
the
data
to
administer
it
properly,
and
so
that's
you
know
one
example,
but
the
other
thing,
of
course,
is
all
the
data
will
be
being
created
as
either
the
commercial
or
residential
portions
of
this
are
being
built,
and
so
it's
not
like
there's
a
big
giant
data
dump,
it's
sort
of
as
fluid
and
trend
and
transitional
as
the
actual
development
itself,
and
at
some
point,
when
you
read
that
reach
that
critical
mass
they've
taken
over
the
services
they're
duly
elected,
they
function
like
any
other
county.
F
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
and
I'm
sure,
if
you'll
indulge
me
for
one
last
question.
F
Yes,
thank
you
very
much.
This
has
to
do
with
section
27,
and
I
appreciate
some
of
the
the
intent
that
was
already
provided
that
you
know
the
goal
is
to
reach
full
assumption
and
kind
of
that
transfer
as
early
as
possible,
and
I
just
wanted
to
ask
again.
This
is
not
my
particular
area
of
expertise,
but
you
know
I
was
looking
particularly
at
some
of
the
property
taxes
and
thinking
of
a
couple
of
things.
F
One
is
the
impact
that
could
potentially
negative
impact
to
the
county,
that's
being
exited
to
their
bonding
capacity.
If
there's
a
large
amount
of
property
assessed
property
value
within
the
zone
that
at
that
transfer
point
is
no
longer
kind
of
under
the
county's
purview
and
then
also
was
thinking
about
what
what
you
stated
earlier
in
terms
of
what
that
whole
harmless
payment
is,
and
so
the
the
less
the
property
that's
that's
developed
at
the
zone.
F
At
that
point,
the
less
that
whole
harmless
payment
is
and
the
more
of
that
development
and
property
value
within
the
zone
can
be
taxed
and
and
that
those
revenues
can
be
used
within
the
zone.
So
I
guess
I'm
really
just
asking.
Is
that
assessment
correct
and
does
that
create
an
additional
incentive
to
transition
away
fully
from
the
county
as
early
as
possible,
both
to
avoid
the
potential
bonding
implications
for
the
county?
That's
being.
M
Chair
benitez
thompson:
if,
if
you
don't
mind
I'll,
take.
M
M
The
reason
for
the
selection
of
april
as
the
required
notification
month
is
that
that
would
make
it
concurrent
with
the
filing
of
a
tentative
budget
and
provide
adequate
planning
time
prior
to
the
file,
the
filing
of
a
final
budget
in
may
and
and
actually
moving
into
that
fiscal
year
that
following
july.
So
that
was
the
significance
of
of
selecting
april
to
provide
that
planning
opportunity
on
both
sides
to
file
budgets
on
a
timely,
timely
basis
and
in
accordance
with
state
requirements.
M
To
your
question
about
bonding
capacity.
That's
a
good
question,
because
bonding
capacity
is
generally
based
on
a
percentage
of
total
valuation
within
within
a
county
and
certainly
if
valuation
was
to
be
reduced.
Overall.
Bonding
capacity
would
be
reduced
to
that
point,
and
I
don't
happen
to
have
it
in
front
of
me
and
if
I
did,
I
suppose
we
wouldn't
have
the
ability
to
share
it
on
the
screen
anyway.
M
But
if,
if
one
were
to
look
at
the
indebtedness
reports
that
are
filed
annually
by
the
local
governments
with
the
state,
that
gives
you
an
indication
of
the
total
bonding
capacity
within
each
local
government
in
the
state
and
the
amount
of
that
bonding
capacity
that
is
actually
currently
being
used,
that
bonding
capacity
is
generally
measured
in
terms
of
general
obligation,
bonding
capacity,
not
in
terms
of
things
like
revenue,
bonds
and
those
types
of
things
that
don't
affect
the
the
full
faith
and
credit
of
the
entity
itself.
M
As
I'm
sure
you're
aware,
if
you
look
at
story
county,
which
I
I
took
an
opportunity
to
to
look
at
the
indebtedness
report
yesterday,
the
amount
of
outstanding
general
obligation
debt,
I
believe
the
number
was
891
000.
M
Remember
too,
that
one
of
the
other
limiting
factors
in
all
of
this,
the
ability
to
incur
and
even
get
to
the
the
full
level
of
one's
bonding
capacity
has
everything
to
do
with
what
your
combined
property
tax
rate
might
be,
and
certainly
a
lot
of
our
rural
counties
are
capped
at
the
3.66
statutory
maximum
rate
and
don't
really
have
any
head
room
to
rise
above
that
anyway.
M
So
I
think
the
indebtedness
report
would
probably
shine
some
light
on
the
question
that
you're
asking
the
only
other
debt
that
story
county
has
outstanding
is:
is
revenue
supported
debt?
It's
not
general
obligation,
supported
and
that's
supported
by
rates
and
charges
from,
I
believe
their
water
and
sewer
agencies,
and
those
would
be
completely
unaffected
by
this,
because
the
the
pledges,
the
rates
and
charges
for
water
and
sewer
and
that
pledge
would
remain
in
force.
There
has
been
some
discussion,
and
mr
iran
could
certainly
add
to
this.
M
I
suppose,
with
regard
to
any
outstanding
indebtedness.
The
891
thousand
that
I
mentioned
to
you
earlier,
which
I
believe
is
a
sales
set
sales
tax
supported
general
obligation.
Credit
that
a
couple
of
things
could
potentially
happen
that
debt
could
be
fully
defeased.
M
It
could
be
defused
by
a
single
payment
on
the
part
of
the
developer
or
the
the
funding
for
the
annual
payments,
and
I
believe
that
debt
matures
in
2028,
so
it's
not-
that
far
off-
could
be
put
into
escrow
and
paid
by
a
trustee.
It's
a
very
simple
matter
to
deal
with
and
in
the
overall
scheme
of
things.
Fortunately,
a
very
small
amount
of
outstanding
embeddedness.
So
hopefully
I
I
didn't
over
answer
your
question
assemblyman,
but
I
wanted
to
give
you
as
much
detail
as
I
could.
F
Thank
you,
mr
hobbs.
I
very
much
appreciate
that
I
I
was
able
to
keep
up
and-
and
I
think
that's
very
helpful.
I
particularly
appreciate
the
additional
clarification
on
section
23
with
the
the
timeline
for
that,
and
we
just
encourage
you
all
to
think
about
that
in
section
22
as
well,
because
certain
services
and
offices
could
also
have
major
budgetary
implications
to
the
local
government
and
so
figuring
out
how
they
may
be
able
to
incorporate
that
into
their
budgeting
cycle
as
well.
It
might
be
something
worth
considering
that.
G
Assuming
was
that
that
it
would
be
adequate
time
for
them
to
to
budget,
but
I
think
one
other
part
of
the
indebtedness
question
I
think,
has
to
be
sort
of
steeped
in
sort
of
what's
happening
there
now
right
number,
one
nothing
exists
on
this
land,
nothing
right,
there's
no
building
currently,
so
the
amount
of
property
taxes
being
paid
to
story
county
right
now
in
the
totality
of
the
67
000
acres.
G
Guy
can
correct
me
this.
It's,
I
think
it's
less
than
200
000,
or
it's
close
to
that.
It's
it's!
It's
nothing
right!
So
understanding
that
that
this
sort
of
loss
of
revenue
conversation
has
to
be
put
in
perspective.
That's
what's
happening
now,
so
let's
go
down
the
road.
Maybe
a
combination
of
your
question
and
the
chairman's
question
about
sequence
of
events.
Let's
just
think
about
this
logic.
G
Right
as
that
begins
to
be
developed,
let's
say
we're
six,
seven
years
down
the
road
right:
it's
20,
27,
20,
28
right
and
let's
say
that
that
same
that
same
land
now
is
producing
three
million
dollars
in
annual
property
tax.
To
story
county
and
in
that
year,
pursuant
to
this
bill,
the
innovation
zone
applies
to
now
or
or
or
notifies
the
county
they're
now
going
to
take
these
services
over
they're
now
going
to
be
beginning
to
implement
property
tax
at
that
moment.
G
At
that
moment,
it's
just
for
ease
of
discussion.
It's
rounded
off
three
million
dollars.
Of
course,
it
won't
be.
Let's
just
say
that
it
is
for
ease
of
conversation,
that
three
million
dollars
will
be
paid
to
story
county
in
perpetuity,
even
though
there'll
be
no
services
that
are
provided
by
story
county
in
that
portion
going
forward
so
understand,
that's
how
this
works
going
forward.
G
There
is
no
money
now,
but
once
that
that
notification
is
made
of
taking
over
the
property
tax
at
that
point,
there's
like
a
a
freeze
and
that
number
has
to
be
paid
to
story
county
going
forward.
So
just
so,
I
practically
understand
how
this
happens.
F
Thank
you,
mr
or
not.
I
appreciate
that
and
that
that
was
what
spurred
that
kind
of
comment
part
of
my
question
in
terms
of
an
incentive
to
reach
full
assumption
of
duties
earlier,
because
then
that
that
is
when
that
that
number
is
is
frozen.
That,
then
goes,
you
know,
goes
to
the
county
with
everything
past
that
going
to
the
to
the
zone.
So
I
appreciate
that
clarification
and
again,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
for
allowing
me
all
the
questions.
A
I
do
want
to
add
one
thing:
real,
quick
just
so
that
people
just
for
the
expectation
that
we'll
go
deeper
into
this
piece
of
conversation
too.
I
have
asked
the
tax
staff
to
work,
work
on
and
look
at
property
value
estimations
for
story
county
in
in
some
specific
kind
of
time
frames
going
forward,
because
there
are
other
dynamics
happening
in
story
county
as
well,
around
property
tax
and
sales
tax.
A
And
so
I
knew
that,
because
we
have
such
smart
and
interested
legislators
on
this
committee
that
you
all
would
be
asking
such
questions
and
so
you'll
see
on
a
future
agenda
when
they're
ready
to
talk
about
what
what
that
will
look
like
over
time
kind
of
exclusive
a
little
bit
of
blockchain.
Just
what
that
county
would
look
like
going
forward
with
some
of
the
other
dynamics
that
are
coming
into
play.
M
M
It
reminded
me
of
a
question
that
senator
lang
had
asked
a
bit
earlier
and
I
thought
it
might
be
worth
adding
a
little
color
and
context
here,
and
that
was
a
question
around
the
provision
of
of
infrastructure
which
will
be
needed
in
a
couple
of
different
ways.
I
mean
clearly
it
will
be
needed
within
the
smart
city
itself
and
within
the
surrounding
area
that
would
be
within
the
innovation
zone,
and
then
there
would
be
cross-border
issues
with
with
other
counties,
and
so
you
have
a
number
of
different
jurisdictions
that
that
come
into
play.
M
That's
certainly
something
that
jeremy
could
get
into
in
quite
some
depth
and
has
in
the
past
with
respect
to
what
the
expectation
would
be
by
creating
all
of
the
the
commercial
enterprises
as
well
as
bringing
in
the
residential
providing
higher
than
average
base
wages,
which
then
translates
into
higher
disposable
incomes
and
all
of
those
sorts
of
things
that
are
part
and
parcel
to
this
one
of
the
other
parts
of
the
bill.
M
The
portion
that
isn't
being
used
to
hold
story
county
harmless,
as
mr
ernot
talked
about
a
few
moments
ago,
which
would
go
on
to
perpetuity
and
as
well,
would
be
receiving
the
amount
of
consolidated
tax
that
is
generated
within
the
boundaries
of
the
innovation
zone,
as
well
as
other
revenues,
fuel
tax
being
one
of
them
and
other
sources
of
revenue
that
are
customary
for
counties
and
local
governments
to
receive.
All
of
those
would
be
available
to
be
used
as
security
on
bonded
indebtedness
on
the
part
of
the
innovation
zone.
M
That
could
be
done
with
assuming
the
example
used
earlier,
sewer
and
water.
If
that's
provided
within
the
innovation
zone
rates
and
charges
would
be
available
and
those
are
customarily
used
along
with
connection
charges,
as
assemblyman
watts
very
well
knows,
having
set
on
a
number
of
those
committees
in
the
past
to
provide
for
that
infrastructure,
as
well
as
the
general
obligation
of
the
innovation
zone
and
the
other
taxes
that
are
customarily
pledged
for
indebtedness.
M
So
there
would
be
the
wherewithal
to
address
a
bit
of
that,
and
then
you
would
also
have
potential
impacts
with
respect
to
ndot
roadways
under
their
jurisdiction,
but
again
with
increases
in
fuel
tax.
M
It
wouldn't
be
completely
without
support
for
helping
to
provide
a
good
amount
of
that
infrastructure.
It's
the
same
way
that
that
other
developing
communities
have
provided
for
that
in
the
past.
But
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
again
that
it's
expected
that
those
those
revenues
that
would
the
nerd
to
the
benefit
of
the
innovation
zone
after
election
to
provision
of
services
would
be
available
for
leveraging
for
infrastructure
purposes.
A
Just
a
quick
question
on
that,
mr
hobbs,
as
long
as
we're
there
and
I'm
sorry,
if
I'm
not
seeing
it
kind
of
plain
faced
in
section
30,
but
the
state's
17
percent
17
cents
of
the
100
valuation,
the
state
keeps
its
portion
or
all
are
you
or
is
it?
Is
language
proposing
all
of
that,
except
for
the
home,
hold
harmless
generated
by
the
iz
stays
in
the
ic.
M
Allison
could
correct
me
if
I'm,
if
I
incorrectly
state
this,
but
the
the
property
taxes
as
they're
levied
in
any
other
unit
of
local
government
would
continue
to
ignore
to
the
benefit
of
those
who
now
levy
those
rates.
So
the
state
would
continue
to
receive
its.
K
Lange
thank
you.
I
just.
I
want
to
ask
a
quick
question
about
education.
It's
on
slide
35
and
it
talks
about
establishing
the
schools
and
the
last.
At
the
end.
It
says
any
combination
thereof.
K
I
think
that
schools
are
really
important
and
the
building
is
really
important
where
the
kids
go
to
school,
and
I
see
a
scenario
in
the
current
language
where
the
innovation
zone
could
contract
with
the
the
nevada
right
now,
but
to
do
everything
online,
and
I
just
want
to
ensure
that
there's
some
language
in
there
that
talks
about
establishing
a
school
if
you're,
going
to
have
schools
and
and
the
innovation
zone
decides
to
have
schools
in
that
area,
that
they
do
buildings
and
they
don't
do
everything
visual.
K
It
worked
during
the
pandemic
because
that's
what
we've
had
to
do,
but
there's
lots
of
research
that
talks
about
how
important
it
is
for
the
kids
to
be
together
for
their
growth
and
maturity
on
moving
forward.
So
I
would
really
like
to
see
that
language
tightened
up
a
bit
just
so
there
isn't
an
opportunity
to
make
everything
visual.
You
know
visual
zoom
schools
and
and
that
we
have
the
buildings
where
the
kids
go.
G
That's
a
great
point
and
we'll
look
into
some
language
to
to
make
you
feel
more
comfortable
about
that.
The
idea
was
that
they
may
have
you
know
a
hybrid
in
which
say
elementary
schools
remained
in
story
county
or
in
washoe
county,
and
they
built
a
you
know
a
a
vocational
or
tech
based
magnet
school
or
charter
school
for
high
school,
and
so
that
there
there
could
be
a
hybrid
of
different
levels
of
that,
but
one
we
didn't
contemplate
was
a
purely
online
school.
G
Nor
would
we
want
to
do
that,
but
you
know
that's
one
of
those
things
where
you
know
and
you're
pointing
out,
maybe
the
obvious
that
wasn't
obvious
to
us.
So
we
should
close
that
loophole.
I
mean
obviously
the
work
the
world
changed
right.
So
we
have
to
think
about
those
things
now
and
even
from
the
point
where
we
started
drafting
this,
the
idea
of
purely
online
schools
being
the
norm
going
forward
wasn't
topping
our
minds.
So
we
would
be
happy
to
to
show
that
up.
K
Thank
you
and
I'd
also
think
about
you
know
if
you're
sending
kids
just
because
I
drove
that
yesterday,
so
I'm
familiar
with
the
distance,
but
if
you're
thinking
about
sending
kids
to
washoe,
for
instance-
and
it's
a
elementary
that's
a
long
time
on
the
bus
and
kids
would
have
to
get
up
really
early
to
get
to
school
at
the
time
school
starts,
and
so
I
think
those
are
all
considerations
and,
from
my
perspective,
it's
better
to
have
school
in
the
community.
A
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
I'm
sort
of
going
to
build
on
your
question
about
60
years
down
the
road
holographic
schools.
If
you
don't
mind-
and
I
also
apologize-
I've
lost
the
computer
again
and
came
back
in
case.
This
question
had
already
been
asked,
but
it's
to
mr
aguero,
his
numbers
is,
is
he
still
on?
C
I
Madam
chair,
through
you
to
a
cinnamon.
I
Somehow
I
hit
the
mute
button.
Forgive
me,
your
your
question
is
a
good
one
and
I
appreciate
it.
You
know
when
we
think
about
the
economic
analysis,
I'm
going
to
be
the
first
one
to
tell
you,
I
think,
we're
being
remarkably
conservative
relative
to
what
the
economic
implications
will
be
both
from
an
employment
and
an
investment
ultimately
requirement
and
the
the
sort
of
productivity
in
the
state
of
nevada.
I
For
all
of
the
reasons
that
you
just
set
forth,
you
know
the
the
future
is
incredibly
unknown
relative
to
this,
and,
and
so
you
know
what
will
blockchains
develop,
how
will
it
develop?
So
how
did
we
go
about
the
economic
impacts?
Then
those
are
largely
based
on
traditional,
real
estate
development
right,
the
development
of
a
residential
housing
unit,
the
development
of
industrial
space,
the
development
of
office
space
right.
I
There
is
nothing
in
the
analysis
that
sort
of
imagines
what
potentially
could
be
possible
relative
to
innovation
and
the
level
of
investment
and
what
that
may
ultimately
mean
mr
ernot
at
the
very
beginning
of
this
conversation,
sort
of
talked
about
making
blockchains
analogous
to
the
internet
and
what
that
could
mean.
I
imagine
that
you
and
I
could
go
back
30
years
ago
and
could
imagine
what
the
internet
would
mean
for
the
way
that
we
do
business,
but
it
would
be
remarkably
difficult
to
sort
of
ascertain
or
even
imagine
everything
would
be
there.
I
So,
sir,
directly
to
your
question,
I
don't
think
that
I
have
I've
done
it
justice
in
terms
of
trying
to
to
capture
that
what
I
have
done
is
try
to
imagine
what
that
amount
of
commercial
and
industrial
and
public
space
would
be
what
that
amount
of
residential
units
would
be
and
what
it
would
mean,
both
from
a
construction
and
an
operating
standpoint
in
terms
of
of
what
that
level
of
investment
would
ultimately
require.
I
I
Why
you
know,
I
think
some
of
the
questions
have
come
up
about
the
potential
implications
on
story,
county
or
whatever
county
becomes
the
host
county,
and
it
strikes
me
as
as
those
those
discuss,
your
question
and
those
other
questions
sort
of
come
up
that
you
know
so
much
went
into
this
drafting
of
the
bill
around
the
the
the
an
effort
to
really
protect
story
county
or
protect
the
host
county.
Because
of
so
many
of
these
unknowns
I
mean
you
know.
The
chairwoman
brings
up.
You
know
sort
of
this.
This
theoretical
right.
I
This
idea
that
we
may
have
holographic
students
or
holographic
classrooms-
I
don't
know
whether
that's
true
or
whether
it
isn't,
but
I
I
don't
know
that.
I
think
it's
necessarily
that
far
fetched
from
where
we
are,
but,
let's
just
imagine
all
kinds
of
things
that
aren't
as
far-fetched
as
that
right.
Let's
just
talk
about
things
as
simple
as
transportation.
I
Right
I
mean
we
talk
about
autonomous
vehicles.
Do
they
need
street
lights?
Do
they
need
street
signs
like
you
traditionally
have
right?
We
we
talk
about,
as
as
someone
watts
talked
about
in
terms
of
the
idea
of
thinking
about
energy
differently.
Well,
if
you
have
the
preponderance
of
electric
cars,
the
idea
that
a
gas
tax
is
necessarily
going
to
be
able
to
fund
your
streets
is
probably
unrealistic.
I
We,
I
don't
know
how
many
communities
I
I've
worked
on
during
my
career,
where
a
question
comes
up
about
the
the
width
of
the
streets,
because
we
have
to
have
the
ability
to
have
a
ladder
truck
or
or
a
a
a
a
fire
truck,
be
able
to
go
up
on
a
street
and
flip
a
u-turn.
When
you
build
that
type
of
technology
into
a
community,
you
no
longer
have
to
have
that.
That's
so
again
to
your
questions,
sort
of
theme
that
comes
up
it's
just
so
foreign
to
what
we've
seen
before
right.
I
We
know,
for
example,
that
20
to
30
percent
of
the
waste
that
happens
in
terms
of
energy
and
water
all
takes
place
as
a
result
of
commercial
buildings
and
how
they're
developed
or
the
legacy
systems
just
the
fact
that
pipes
leak
in
those
type
of
things.
Modern
technology
today
can
essentially
eliminate
all
of
that
or
at
least
to
reduce
it
dramatically.
We
think
about
the
way
we
get
delivered
healthcare.
I
The
fact
that
I
don't
know
my
dentist
can
receive
information
from
my
toothbrush
or,
if
I
opt
in
my
mirror,
can
send
information
relative
to
my
vital
signs.
To
my
doctor
I
mean
we're
thinking
about
things
that
we
can't
even
imagine
today
and
trying
to
somehow
retrofit
them
into
how
we've
done
things
in
the
past.
It
seems
to
me
is
almost
impossible.
So
when
you,
you
ask
your
question
or
some
of
those
other
themes
that
have
been
out
there.
I
think
it
really
underscores
sort
of
this.
I
This
bigger
question,
the
one
that
seems
to
come
up
and
we
might
as
well
take
it
on
head
on,
and
that
is
why
the
creation
of
an
innovation
zone,
why
the
creation
of
a
separate
government
to
handle
all
that,
and
it's
for
the
exact
reason
that
I
think
has
underpinned
so
many
of
the
questions
that
have
come
out
today.
It's
the
goal
of
not
trying
to
somehow
alienate
or
be
an
affront
to
other
governments,
but
rather
to
try
and
protect
them.
Because
of
how
different
this
really
is,
and
from
an
economic
impact
standpoint.
I
G
The
second
part
of
that
is
driven
almost
entirely
by
the
the
tax
on
the
underlying
technology,
and
that
leads
me
to
one
point
that
is
sort
of
an
ongoing
confusion,
not
yours,
but
but
other
folks,
in
which
we
have
a
conversation
between
blockchains
and
blockchains,
and
invariably
somebody
says
yeah.
But
you
know
I'm
really
worried
about
cryptocurrency
understand
that
cryptocurrency
is
but
one
portion
of
a
of
a
technology.
That's
made
better
by
blockchains
back
to
the
windows
versus
word.
G
Okay,
cryptocurrency
is
only
one
thing
that
can
run
on
blockchains
and
is
run
more
securely,
but
this
is
the
point
that
I
that
I
need
to
make
the
transactions
all
the
transactions
that
are
made
in
this
community
are
not
cryptocurrency
based
they're,
not
cryptocurrency,
based,
and
that's
like
a
fundamental
confusion
that
no
matter
how
many
times
we
say
it
folks
seem
to
continue
to
confuse
it.
Blockchain
technology
at
its
core
is
a
ledger
of
transactions.
G
When
it's
operating
at
full
tilt,
say
ethereum,
it
is
millions
of
transactions.
The
way
this
fee
generates.
The
numbers
that
jeremy
is
talking
is
much
like
a
credit
card
fee
right.
You
go
use
your
visa
card
wherever
you
use
your
bricks
and
mortar
store
online
travel,
anything
in
which
you
use
your
credit
card,
there's
a
very,
very
small
fee
that
is
collected.
That's
exactly
the
idea
here,
that
of
those
millions
of
transactions
that
will
be
created
by
this
by
the
development
of
this
technology.
G
So
those
transactions
can
be
done
with
any
number
of
currencies,
not
just
cryptocurrency.
So
the
idea
of
the
volatility
of
cryptocurrency
is
such
an
infinitesimal
issue
when
it
comes
to
the
transactional
volume
of
blockchains
that
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
other
folks
don't
become
confused
by
the
difference
of
cryptocurrency
and
blockchain,
because
they're
apples
and
transmissions.
A
I
guess
along
that,
if
I
could
ask
a
question,
then,
along
that
same
lines
on
mr
or
not
so
like,
we
create
general
law
in
the
state.
You
know
hypothetically
we're
not
creating
special
legislation
for
any
one
entity
and
nor
how
we
have
we
ever,
but
let
but
we're
talking
really
specifically
about
about
one
applicant
that
we
know
right
now,
that's
interested
which
is
which
is
blockchain,
and
so
let's
say
that
we
we
get
that
blockchain
successfully
has
an
application
that
they
get
through
their
governance
board
phase.
A
They
establish
their
commercial,
they
get
to
residential,
they
have
an
elected
board.
I
guess
how
does
it
work
then
to
have
a
new
form
of
government
that
is
predicated
upon
one
certain
technology
in
terms
of
a
mandated
use
by
residents?
G
I'm
not
sure
I
understand
from
from
a
product
standpoint.
I
would
say
this:
the
underlying
technology
that
that
would
operate
this
community
obviously
would
deal
with
a
lot
of
different
transactions.
I.
G
Necessarily
mandated
it's
it's,
it's
obviously
the
foundational
technology
that
runs
the
entire
community,
both
commercial
and
residential,
but
companies
obviously
have
a
choice
of
whether
or
not
they
want
to
be
part
of
an
innovation
zone
and
invest
and
build
their
their
businesses.
There,
then,
in
turn,
they
have
the
opportunity
for
their
residents
to
make
a
choice
of
whether
they
want
to
live
there,
and
so
the
idea
that
the
blockchain
technology
being
the
underlying
foundational
technology
of
both
the
commercial
residential
committee
and
all
of
those
related
things.
G
We've
talked
about
whether
it's
smart
grid,
energy
technology,
whether
it's
ai,
whether
it's
nanotechnology,
3d
printing,
any
of
those
sorts
of
things
that
are
all
be
developed.
People
get
to
make
that
decision
as
they
come
in.
If
they
want
to
live
in
that
environment,
right
no
one's
forced
to
live
there.
A
I
guess
in
that
same
way,
would
you
say
it's
akin
to
a
line
of
an
argument
that,
if
a
resident
chooses
to
move
into
an
area
that
has
an
hoa
and
if
you
want
to
live
here,
your
lawn
must
look
like
this.
If
you
want
to
live
here,
your
house
must
be
within
one
of
these
three
shades
of
brown
or
or
such
like
that.
So,
if
I'm
understanding
the
logic
right,
is
that
how
you
would
have
it
be
be
comparable.
G
Yeah,
I
mean
that's
a
great
method,
but
but
I
think
the
thing
too
is
this
should
be
a.
This
should
be
a
great
benefit
right.
I
mean
the
point
of
having
a
sort
of
a
seamless
integration
between
the
the
the
commercial
aspect
of
this,
the
incubator,
if
you
were,
will
all
these
these
technologies
will
be
developed
and
executed
upon
in
nevada
and
and
the
the
residential
space
should
be
the
one
of
the
biggest
drivers
to
bring
the
best
and
brightest
developers
from
around
the
globe
here.
G
The
one
of
the
sort
of
better
mouse
traps
here
is
that
there
is
a
complete
integration
between
where
you
live
and
where
you
work
and
there's
no
sort
of
break
in
the
innovation.
That's
not
going
to
be
for
everybody,
but
what
we
believe
is
that
it's
going
to
be
something
that
is
so
unique
and
such
a
driver
that
it's
going
to
bring
the
best
people
in
that
space
here,
because
it
is
completely.
C
G
And
so
all
of
those
things
become,
you
know
an
ins,
you
know
an
inspiring
an
incentive
to
be
here
in
nevada,
living
and
working
in
this
innovation
zone.
So
it's
it's.
It's
certainly
not
as
we
think
of
it
as
a
mandate.
It's
a
tremendous
opportunity
that
you
can
choose
to
do
or
not
right.
A
A
A
Let's
say
you,
let's
take
the
hoa
analogy
where
you,
if
you
want
a
community,
you
have
an
understanding
up
front
about
the
rules
and
restrictions
around
which
you
will
be
a
resident
in
that
community,
and
they
can.
You
know,
let's
say
your
house
can
be
these
only
three
color
paints,
but
if
that,
if
they
mandated
the
production
of
those
paints,
and
then
you
could
only
buy
those
paints
from
them,
does
the
resident
really
have
a
choice?
A
G
So
I
think,
I
think,
fundamental
to
the
answer
that
question
is
a
deeper
understanding
of
blockchain
technology
itself
at
its
core
blockchain
technologies.
We
talk
about
those
transactions.
Each
of
those
peer-to-peer
transactions
have
to
be
agreed
upon
between
every
party
to
the
transaction.
The
idea
of
it
is
that
everyone
is
empowered
and
equalized
in
those
transactions.
It
begins
with
having
your
own
identity,
your
own
digital
identity.
G
At
the
end
of
this,
the
way
that
the
community
works
and
the
way
the
transaction
works,
everybody
has
to
agree.
So
there
may
be
opportunities
for
different
things,
are
developed
within
the
innovation
zone
or
outside
of
the
innovation
zone
that
become
an
opportunity
for
that
community
to
use
and
use
better
innovate.
They
have
to
agree
right.
They
have
to
agree
for
those
transactions
to
work
that
is
basic
and
fundamental
to
blockchain
technology.
That's
why
at
its
core
it
it
empowers
each
individual,
regardless
of
any
social
stature
or
any
other
quality
and
filter.
G
G
If
there
is
such
a
thing,
all
of
those
things
like
a
traditional
hoa,
but
as
far
as
the
services
go
with
the
use
of
natural
resources,
energy
and
all
of
those
sorts
of
things,
the
fundamental
blockchain
technology
empowers
the
individual
and
everyone
has
to
agree
on
each
transaction
or
it
doesn't
work.
So
the
idea
that
one
entity
could
mandate
anything
in
a
community
that
is
driven
by
blockchain
technology
is
completely
the
opposite.
It's
an
athlete
it's
an
impossibility,
because
that's
not
how
it
works.
G
That's
why
it's
such
an
incredibly
important
issue,
especially
for
those
people
that
are
economically
disadvantaged.
It
is
the
great
equalizer
as
you
come
into
a
transaction,
it
does
not
associate
one
one
entity
that
has
more
power
than
another
all
have
to
agree.
That's
the
unanimous
consent
on
each
transaction
in
a
blockchain
technology
and
operate
properly.
A
A
This
section
of
the
this
portion
of
the
agenda
take
a
15-minute
break
and
I'm
going
to
ask
members
to
kind
of
you
know:
use
that
break
to
grab
your
your
lunch
and
attend
to
any
personal
needs
you
have,
but
then
I'd
like
to
come
back
at
just
afternoon
at
1205
and
begin
on
agenda
item
five.
We
have
story
county
and
agenda
item
five
and
we
have
six
subsections
under
there,
and
so
I
know
that's
going
to
be
a
time
commitment
for
for
us
as
well.
A
So
unless
there's
any
opposition,
we'll
of
course
keep
talking
about
more
of
these
subtopics
and
future
agendas,
but
for
right
now,
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
end
this
portion
of
the
agenda
all
right,
I
don't
see
anyone
throwing
a
complete
fit
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
we'll
do
that
so
I'll
put
us
in
recess
until
1205.
I
want
to
thank
everyone
in
agenda
item
4
for
being
available,
and
I
appreciate
all
the
materials
that
you
gave
to
us
for
members
of
the
public.
A
You
have
that
at
your
disposal,
what
we're
seeing
you
are
able
to
see
and
for
our
presenters
under
agenda
item
five,
we'll
be
ready
for
you
at
1205..
Thank
you.
A
A
We
are
on
agenda
item
five,
which
is
presentations
by
story
county.
We
have
a
number
of
different
presentations
here
reminder
to
our
public,
our
presenters
and
our
legislators
that
our
zoom
share
function
is
not
operating
right
now,
and
so
our
presenters
are
going
to
be
giving
us
indicators
of
where
they
are
in
their
presentation
and
to
help
us
move
through
the
presentation.
So
let
us
know
your
page,
markers
and
such
so
that
that
way
we
can,
we
can
kind
of
all
follow
along
and
we
have
a
3g
presentations.
A
N
All
right,
thank
you
so
much
for
madam
chair
happy
to
be
here
with
you
and
thank
you
for
letting
us
share
our
thoughts
with
you
today.
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
introduce
everybody
for
those
following
along
the
only
material
that
I
will
be
referencing
a
little
bit
later
in
my
comments
is
the
second
to
last
one
on
the
legislative
website.
It's
entitled
story,
county
correspondence,
it's
a
timeline
of
kind
of,
what's
happened
in
this
process
and
so
I'll
get
to
that
in
just
a
moment.
N
Just
wanted
to
give
a
little
heads
up
before
we
get
into
it.
I
wanted
to
take
just
a
moment
as
well
for
the
record
clay
mitchell
story
county,
commissioner,
and
I
wanted
to
take
just
a
moment
to
acknowledge
the
amount
of
work
that
has
gone
into
this
proposal
by
the
proponents.
It's
not
a
simple
proposal
and
there
are
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
elements
to
it,
and
I
definitely
want
to
commend
ms
combs
for
presenting
in
such
a
clear
way.
N
So
I'll
make
a
few
remarks
to
provide
a
little
bit
of
context
and
introduce
the
members
of
our
team,
then
I'll
turn
it
over
to
mary
walker
from
walker
and
associates
she's,
one
of
our
government
affairs
consultants
to
take
us
through
agenda
item
5c,
which
deals
with
comparing
governance
models
and
some
specific
concerns
we
have
identified
with
this
proposed
legislation
and
we've
invited
our
justice
of
the
peace
eileen
harrington,
our
local
judge,
to
weigh
in
on
some
of
the
legal
or
just
judicial
aspects
as
well.
You
know
assemblyman
o'neil.
N
You
pointed
out
last
meeting
that
the
devil's
in
the
details
and
we'll
definitely
be
highlighting
some
of
those
details
and
then,
as
we
move
into
agenda
item
5d,
we'll
hear
from
story
county
sheriff,
gerald
antonoro
as
well
as
story
county
fire,
district
chief
jeremy,
loncar
about
public
safety
impacts.
N
Osborne's
presentation
is
to
further
that
conversation
by
sharing
some
specific
data
about
story,
county's
role,
size
structure
and
the
impact
of
abatements
on
the
county,
and
we
acknowledge
that,
while
abatements
have
traditionally
been
the
coin
of
the
realm,
both
in
nevada
and
nationally
and
attracting
new
development
projects,
there
are
different
approaches
that
should
be
considered
and
then
at
the
end,
I'll
briefly
wrap
up,
and
our
entire
team
will
be
available
to
answer
any
questions
that
the
committee
may
have
until
about.
Four
o'clock:
that's
when
we
had
to
reschedule
our
county
commission
meeting
too.
N
So,
with
your
permission,
then,
chairman
woman,
I'd
like
to
move
into
my
remarks
under
item
5b.
N
In
fact,
as
we
speak,
the
ink
is
drying
on
a
deal
with
a
company
called
nanotech
energy
that
has
just
closed
on
516
acres
in
story
county
and
is
planning
to
build
a
cutting
edge.
Graphene,
energy
storage,
production,
historic
energy
storage
production
facility,
a
battery
facility,
an
r
d
campus
in
story
county,
and
this
will
further
cement
northern
nevada
as
a
leader
in
diverse
innovative
technological
development.
N
Now,
as
senator
dennis
mentioned
last,
meeting,
blockchains
is
an
important
emerging
technology
with
many
potential
use
cases.
In
fact,
just
this
last
week
I
conducted
a
training
on
cryptocurrency
and
blockchain
technology,
with
some
county
fiscal
officers
that
we
were
hosting
from
across
the
state,
and
we
discussed
how
implementation
of
these
technologies
can
impact
their
work.
N
Well,
this
all
started
before
my
time
in
office.
My
understanding
is
that
there
were
some
preliminary
conversations
with
county
leaders
after
the
property
was
purchased.
I
don't
know
the
specifics
of
those
meetings.
Non-Disclosure
agreements
were
signed
and
they're
being
held
to,
but
my
understanding
is
that
blockchains
came
away
from
those
meetings.
Concluding
that
story
county
would
not
support
residential
development
on
the
scale
that
they
were
envisioning.
N
N
So
then
we
jump
to
january
16th
of
this
year
and
that's
when
the
governor
mentioned
the
idea
of
innovation
zones
in
a
state
of
the
state
address,
but
no
substantial
details
were
included
at
that
time.
It
was
later
that
month
that
r
r
partners
presented
the
innovation
zone
concept
by
zoom
to
story,
county
staff
and
officials.
N
Subsequent
to
that
early
this
year
our
partners
gave
presentations
to
groups
in
northern
nevada
and
stated
that
story
county
was
not
interested
in
residential
development.
On
both
occasions,
county
staff
was
on
the
call
and
disagreed
with
that
assertion.
Referencing,
our
county
master
plan
that
calls
for
substantial
residential
development
at
painted
rock
and
county
manager
osborne
will
elaborate
more
on
that.
N
In
early
march,
we
took
in
our
first
official
position
and
sent
that
position
in
a
letter
to
the
governor's
office
and
to
go
ed.
That
position
has
not
changed
and
has
been
reaffirmed
on
multiple
occasions,
since
that
position
is
one
that
supports
innovative
technological
development,
supports
inclusion
and
development
of
blockchain
technology
and
cryptocurrency
supports
residential
development
at
painted
rock,
but
it
opposes
the
separate
govern
governance
elements
of
this
proposal.
N
N
N
We
also
offered
to
facilitate
a
town
hall
meeting
jointly
held
with
both
our
county
commission
and
the
planning
commission
to
give
blockchains
an
opportunity
to
present
their
ideas
in
concept
and
gather
feedback
from
both
the
public
and
also
decision
makers
in
story
county
on
the
planning
side.
We
suggested
several
dates
for
this,
none
of
which
worked
for
blockchains.
We
asked
for
blockchains
to
supply
us
with
some
dates
on
which
we
could
hold
such
a
public
meeting.
None
were
supplied,
and
then
we
were
notified
in
writing.
N
N
Now
assemblyman
watson
noted
that
we
need
to
delve
into
specifically
into
what
policy
would
be
needed
to
facilitate
blockchain's
development
aspirations,
and
we
intend
today
to
show
that,
while
there
are
certainly
policies
that
could
facilitate
the
use
and
inclusion
of
blockchain
technology
that
could
be
considered
by
the
legislature,
existing
local
structures
are
wholly
sufficient
to
facilitate
and
encourage
development
of
this
type.
Despite
the
assertions
to
the
contrary
in
the
bill
proposal,
and
I
think
that
this
one
assertion
that's
made
in
the
findings
of
the
legislation
is
really
the
crux
of
this
issue.
N
N
N
So
first
we'll
play
that
opposition
role
and
then
we'll
make
the
case
that
working
with
story
county
is
a
far
better
choice
than
carving
up
story,
county
or
any
county
in
the
state.
So
chairwoman.
That
concludes
my
remarks
under
item
five
being
with
your
permission,
we'll
invite
mary
walker
to
take
us
through
item
5c
and
she'll
reference.
The
supporting
documentation
for
her
section.
A
Okay,
that
works
all
right.
Miss
walker
and
I
see
that
there's
a
couple
of
different
kind
of
I'll
call
them
more
like
I
don't
want
to
say
a
flow
chart,
but
argument
charts
and
so
there
I
think,
there's
three
of
them
here
so
you'll
just
make
sure
that
we're
on
the
right
one
and
following
the
right
one:
okay,.
O
I
this
whole
issue,
bdr
1109
and
the
entire
innovation
zone
issue
is
so
complex.
I
I
broke
this
down
into
this
presentation
down
into
three
parts.
The
first
part
concerns
why
bdr
1109
innovation
zone
legislation
is
neces
even
necessary.
The
second
part
is
a
comparison
of
other
governance
models
and
the
third
part
concerns
this
specific
bill.
Draft
language
in
bdr,
1109,
I'd
like
to
start
with
agenda
item
5,
and
it's
it's
the
first
one
listed
under
agenda
item
5..
O
It's
story,
county
responses
regarding
legislation
and
up
on
top
here
it
says
special
joint
committee.
Why
is
bdr
1109
innovation
zone
legislation
necessary?
That's
what
I
would
start
with.
A
O
Okay,
so
what
we
did
is
we
took
the
blockchain's
representative
testimony
from
august
12th
regarding
why
the
innovation
zone
legislation
is
necessary
and
they
did
walk
through
why
they
thought
it
was
necessary.
So
we
would
like
to
to
discuss
that.
O
First
off,
mr
lee
weiss
stated
that
a
development
of
this
character
and
scope
requires
collaboration
with
forward-thinking,
real
estate,
development
professionals,
like-minded
technology
partners
and,
of
course,
substantial
capital.
Blockchains
is
not
planning
on
doing
this
alone.
Realistically,
the
necessary
commitments
from
this.
These
key
partners
and
investors
can
only
be
secured.
O
If
we
are
able
to
convince
them,
the
community
will
be
able
to
attract
sufficient
residents
and
have
long-term
viability
based
on
the
innovative
philosophy
that
underlying
underlies
this
project,
it
will
be
difficult
and
likely
impossible
to
attract
the
necessary
partners
and
investors
unless
there
is
clear
buy-in
to
nevada
that
there
is
a
path
for
unique
residential
projects
like
this,
to
have
autonomous
governments
run
by
their
residents,
as
opposed
to
being
under
control
of
existing
county
governments
that
serve
more
traditional
communities.
The
draft
innovation
zone
legislation
provides
this
path.
O
O
Therefore,
investors
are
not
investing
on
the
merits
of
the
blockchain's
incorporated
proposed
smart
city
and
innovation
zone
concept.
Why
would
investors
not
invest
in
an
approved
county,
planned
unit
development
and
develop
through
proper
existing
means?
Other
tech
uses
are
allowed
already
in
story
county
without
any
for
further
action,
and
how
is
that
hindering
investment?
O
Other
companies
across
the
world
get
investor
contributions
every
minute
of
the
day.
The
second
point
mr
weiss
made
was
fitting
in
an
innovation
zone
into
an
existing
county
is
not
reasonably
feasible,
as
you
know,
for
nevada
counties
with
under
a
hundred
thousand
residents
the
governing
bodies
of
three
or
five
person
county
commission,
a
citizen
commission.
Those
individuals
cannot
reasonably
devote
the
time
to
govern
their
existing
town,
plus
a
new
innovation
zone
with
completely
different
infrastructure
and
gold.
O
Our
response
is
county
and
city
boards
govern
their
jurisdictions
and
facilitate
private
innovation
all
the
time
across
the
country.
This
is
nothing
new.
The
city
of
las
vegas's
population
grew
from
8
000.
In
1940
to
600
000
in
2020
over
an
80-year
period,
this
equates
to
an
average
annual
population
increase
of
thousand
four
hundred
residents.
O
The
population
of
the
city
of
reno
went
from
twenty
one
thousand
three
hundred
seventeen
in
nineteen,
forty
to
two
hundred
sixty
six
thousand
five
hundred
eleven
in
twenty
twenty.
This
equates
to
an
average
annual
population
increase
of
3065
residents.
In
comparison,
the
innovation
zone
is
projecting
30
additional
35
000
people
in
a
75-year
period.
O
O
In
the
last
20
years
story,
county
has
actually
built
out
30
000
acres.
In
comparison,
the
blockchain's
incorporated
proposal
builds
out
4
000
acres
over
the
first
20
years
story,
county's
proven
track
record
of
successfully
assisting
fortune.
500
companies
to
build
their
projects
in
nevada
would
be
of
great
benefit
to
the
innovation
zone,
not
a
hindrance.
O
O
In
fact,
sangdo
is
termed
a
small
city,
but
it's
actually
an
international
business
district
located
within
this
existing
city
of
incheon.
Therefore,
the
notion
that
fitting
in
an
innovation
zone
into
an
existing
county
is
not
reasonably
feasible.
That
statement
we
do
not
believe
is
has
any
foundation.
O
The
third
point,
mr
weiss
made
the
game
of
our
project
is
seeing
blockchain
and
other
technologies
to
create
a
new
type
of
smart
community.
One
that
focuses
on
the
individual
part
and
parcel
of
that
goal
is
to
create
and
implement
a
completely
reimagined
municipal
and
administrative
systems,
including
a
government
with
substantial
direct
individual
participation.
O
O
Our
response
is
the
idea
that
traditional
government
and
a
diversified
system
of
government
in
which
all
stakeholders
can
participate
can't
co-exist,
has
no
basis.
In
fact,
the
two
primary
models-
the
proponents
of
the
innovation
zone,
legislation
use
songdo,
south
korea,
korea
and
walt
disney
world
are
two
real
world
examples
which
document
the
fact
the
two
can
and
do
coexist.
O
For
example,
songdo,
south
korea,
korea
is
seen
as
the
first
smart
city
with
much
of
the
same
development
and
technology.
The
blockchain's
incorporated
representatives
tout
such
as
a
smart
garbage
system.
Transportation
sensors
throughout
the
smart
city,
which
generates
data
just
like
the
innovation
zone,
would
yet
song
go
south
korea
operates
within
the
traditional
system
of
government.
O
Sangdo
is
located
in
the
city
of
incheon
and
is
called
the
sangdo
international
business
district
and
in
fact,
sangdo.
South
korea
was
built
by
the
south
korean
government,
not
only
in
the
planning,
but
when
it
started
filling
in
tidal
flats
in
the
yellow
sea,
with
500
million
tons
of
sand
in
an
effort
to
build
a
business
district
near
an
international
airport.
O
And
then,
when
you
look
at
disney
world
disney
world
operates
within
two
traditional
government
counties
in
florida,
orange
county
and
osceola
counties.
In
addition,
boards
and
county
leaders
oftentimes
have
to
work
with
different
population.
Centers
and
oftentimes
have
have
interlocal
agreements
to
serve
counties
and
cities
jointly.
Tri
center
is
an
example
occurring
already
in
story
county.
O
O
O
O
The
last
point
mr
weiss
made
was
even
if
the
county
wanted
to
match
the
innovation
zone
in
terms
of
technology
and
data
generation
and
analysis,
the
cost
would
be
prohibited.
Innovation
zone
structure
ensures
innovation
without
burdening
existing
local
governments.
To
illustrate
this
point,
let's
talk
about
a
concrete
example.
O
A
simple
example
would
be
an
incompatibility
within
the
county
system,
and
potential
innovation
zone
system
is
the
tax
collection.
Blockchain
technology
allows
for
the
collection
of
taxes
in
real
time
right
when
transactions
are
taking
place.
Implementation
of
such
a
new
system
in
a
smart
community
built
from
the
ground
up
is
relatively
straightforward.
O
O
Without
this
legislation,
therefore,
investors
are
not
investing
on
the
merits
of
the
burns
innovation
zone
and
smart
city
concept,
as
mr
white
testified
to.
We
believe
this
is
true,
but
is
that
the
legislature's
role
to
pass
laws
so
a
new
ongoing
excuse,
a
new
emerging
business
can
find
investors
I'd
like
to
go
now
to
the
next
spreadsheet,
and
this
is
agenda
item
comparison
of
government's
model
and
it's
this
is
this
sheet
right
here.
O
And
what
it
is,
is
I'm
comparing
the
disney
creek
reedy
creek
improvement
district
for
versus
the
burns
innovation
zone?
That,
and
so
I
have
a
description.
I
have
yes
and
no
as
much
as
I
could
yes
and
no
answers
to
how
it
really
creek
addresses
it.
How
the
innovation
zone
addresses
it
and
then
notes.
O
First
off
when
you
compare
the
disney
reedy
creek
improvement
district,
which
is
enacted
in
florida
in
1967
to
mr
burns
innovation
zone
legislation,
the
first
a
question
is:
what
level
of
government
did
each
entity
propose
to
their
respective
legislatures
in
the
disney's
reedy
creek
improvement
district?
They
the
disney
proposed
to
the
1967
legislature,
a
general
improvement
district.
O
O
In
section
14
of
the
bdr
22
1109
innovation
zone
legislation,
the
innovation
zone
becomes
a
local
government
and
a
political
subdivision
of
the
state
separate
and
independent
of
the
county
in
which
it
is
located
upon
approval
of
an
application
to
create
an
innovation
zone.
This
allows
the
burns
two
of
three
appointed
supervisors
to
control
the
innovation
zone.
O
How
long
of
a
period
is
that
from
when
one
person
in
state
government
approves
the
application
for
an
innovation
zone
until
a
hundred
or
more
voters
reside
in
the
in
innovation
zone,
and
I
was
glad
to
hear
this
morning
that
ms
combs
stated
that
it
could
be
many
years
before
between
that
period
and
will
mr
burns
allow
the
loss
of
control
over
his
government
because
he
does
control
two-thirds
of
the
votes
and
and
just
because
there
is
no
fiduciary
interests.
Excuse
me:
pecuniary
interests,
there's
a
lot
of
other
ways.
O
You
control
boats
and
people
than
just
the
culinary,
and
then
why
was
a
hundred
or
more
registered
voters?
The
threshold
decided?
Is
it
because
mr
burns
have
approximately
100
employees
in
his
business
per
linkedin
and
he
can
control
them
as
disney
controls,
its
executive
employees,
who
are
the
only
voting
members
of
the
reedy
creek
improvement
district
number?
Four?
Do
the
governments
operate
within
existing
counties?
The
land
is
located
in
yes,
reedy
creek
operates
within
the
two
florida
counties
of
orange
and
osceola
in
the
innovation
zone.
The
answer
is
no.
O
Mr
burns
proposed
innovation
zone
when
it
would,
in
effect,
secede
forty
percent
of
story,
county
land
from
story
county
number,
five.
Does
the
legislation
creating
the
governance
include
a
legal
description
of
the
boundaries
of
the
governmental
entity
in
the
reedy
creek
improvement
district
legislation?
O
Yes,
they
actually
had
the
boundaries
legal
description
of
the
boundaries,
but
in
an
innovation
zone
legislation
there
is
no
boundaries.
There
is
no
legal
description
of
the
land
within
the
innovation
zone.
Therefore,
the
zones
boundaries
I
mean:
could
they
change?
Could
they
could
the
innovation
zone
annex
adjacent
properties
such
as
tesla,
google
and
switch?
O
Could
the
innovation
zone
de-annex
areas
every
government
in
nevada
has
a
legal
description
of
the
land
within
their
jurisdiction?
Why
is
the
legal
description
of
the
land
the
innovation
zone
would
govern
not
be
included?
How
can
basic
governance
occur
if
there
is
no
boundary
of
governing
jurisdictions?
O
Number
six?
Does
the
legislation
creating
the
governance,
allow
a
person
unknown
to
the
legislature,
control
of
a
government
under
the
reedy
creek?
The
answer
is
no,
because
the
florida
legislature
knew
it
was
disney
and
they
everyone
knew
disney,
had
built
disneyland
and
was
there
was
no
need
to
to
do
anything
more
other
than
hey
it's
disney,
but
in
this
process
in
the
innovation
zone
process
you
could
actually
have
a
person
unknown
to
the
legislature,
control
of
the
innovation
zone
government
because
they
are
going
to
control
two
of
the
three
vote.
O
O
Mr
burns
proposal
is
for
any
person
who
submits
an
application
to
establish
an
innovation
zone
and
is
granted
approval
through
a
bureaucratic
process,
and
that
is
what
will
control
how
the
government
is
established
and
just
as
a
side
note,
the
legislature
approved
tesla's
economic
development
proposal.
Knowing
it
was
tesla,
not
an
unknown
person
or
business.
O
There
are
no.
The
other
thing
that's
very
worrying
to
me
and
I'll
we'll
get
to
this-
is
there
are
no
qualifications
of
this
person,
including
requiring
them
to
be
a
us
citizen
they
this
person,
this
applicant,
does
not
have
to
be
a
u.s
citizen
number
seven.
Does
the
legislation
creating
the
governance
include
police
powers,
judicial
powers,
health
authority
powers,
welfare
powers
and
school
powers
and
authority
in
reedy
creek?
O
No,
it
doesn't
because
they're,
not
a
county
in
the
innovation
zone.
Yes,
it
does
because
mr
burns
proposed
innovation
zone
powers
include
all
county
powers
and
authority
number
eight.
Do
the
businesses
and
citizens
of
the
respected
models
do
they
pay
on
property
taxes
and
sales
tax
for
and
there's
a
big
difference
here,
because
in
in
the
reedy
creek
situation,
it's
not
a
county,
they
didn't
develop
a
county
which
its
land
is
seceded
from
another
county.
O
O
No-
and
I
appreciate
the
the
discussion
this
morning,
I
would
say
it's
limited
on
the
property
tax,
but
in
regards
to
the
consolidated
tax,
I
believe
that
that
is
where
the
the
real
issue
is
is
because
you're
you're
taking
story
county
and
you're
cutting
out
40
percent
that
it's.
So
what
they're
talking
about
is
that
they
would
hold
harmless.
They
say
story
county
on
the
property
tax
that
once
they
decide
to
take
over
all
the
government
could
be
many
years
from
now.
O
Then
the
property
tax
would
be
frozen
for
story
county
and
they
would
get
that
in
in
the
future.
This
property
tax
is
a
smaller
revenue
source
for
most
local
governments.
The
big
revenue
source
is
the
consolidated
tax.
This
the
sales
tax,
particularly
within
the
consolidated
tax
in
section
29,
mr
burns
proposed
innovation
zone.
It
would,
what
would
happen
is
they
are
requiring
it
and
I'll
get
into
this
more?
They
are
requiring.
The
consolidated
tax,
which
is
the
major
portion,
is
the
sales
tax
to
go
permanently
back
to
the
innovation
zones.
O
As
I
read
it,
it's
not
at
the
time
that
they
decide
to
take
over
all
the
services
there.
It
looks
like
to
me
that
they're
handling
those
sales
taxes,
the
bccrt
and
sccrt
sales
taxes
in
a
completely
different
manner,
that
at
the
time
that
the
director
would
establish
the
innovation
zone,
that's
the
time
that
the
innovation
zone
would
get
back
all
of
the
basic
city
county
relief
tax,
all
of
the
sccrt
taxes
from
thence
on
forward
right
at
the
time
that
the
director
approves
the
innovation
zone.
O
However,
with
mr
burns
being
able
to
consolidate
all
the
county
offices
into
one
at
a
low
cost,
mr
burns
would
be
able
to
take
the
tax
dollars
and
pay
for
his
development
costs,
instead
of
it
being
born
by
the
developer.
Mr
burns,
the
county
property
taxes
would
be
paid
to
the
innovation
zone
after
taking
over
all
the
services,
and
I
I
appreciate
that
that
clarification
this
morning,
number
nine.
O
O
Mr
burns
proposal
would
allow
the
innovation
zone
board
of
supervisors
the
ability
to
take
on
county
services,
authorities
and
powers
whenever
they
wish,
with
60
days
notice
to
the
original
accounting.
Providing
the
service
disney's
ready,
creek
could
expand
its
governmental
services
well,
first
off
in
the
actual
florida
legislation
it
defined
every
single
service
that
they
could
could
actually
provide
disney
wanted
to
do
more
than
that
expand
this
governmental
services.
That
could
only
happen
if
they
had
cooperative
agreements
with
the
county
or
another
government.
O
O
O
Mr
burns
proposal
establishes
not
a
legislative
process
to
approve
the
establishment
of
the
innovation
zone
county,
but
a
bureaucratic
process
while
breedi
creek
improvement,
district
controlled
by
walt
disney
world
was
approved
by
the
1967
florida
legislature
and
on
a
side
note,
the
le
tesla
project
was
approved
in
2014
special
session
of
the
legislature,
not
by
a
bureaucrat
number
11
did
the
proposer
of
the
legislation
have
development
experience
under
reedy
creek?
Yes,
it
was
disney
under
innovation
zone.
No.
O
O
The
draft
innovation
zone
legislation
legislation
provides
its
path.
Therefore,
it
appears
mr
weiss
is
suggesting
it
is
likely
impossible
to
affect
the
necessary
partners
and
investors
on
their
own.
Mr
weiss
is
suggesting
they
currently
do
not
have
the
financial
resources
to
do
the
project
and
they
will
have
to
raise
the
money
to
do
the
project
and,
like
disney
tesla,
also
had
sufficient
resources
to
build
the
gigafactory
in
story
county
at
the
time
of
the
2014
nevada,
legislative
approval
of
the
project
and
incentive
number
13
did
proposer
of
the
legislation
own
or
lease
the
land.
O
O
O
O
O
The
conclusion
of
part
two
of
this
presentation:
comparisons
of
governance
models
between
disney,
the
reedy,
creek
improvement
district
and
the
innovation
zone
shows
how
different
they
really
are.
I
have
learned
through
this
exercise
and
review
songdo
south
korea,
that
there
is
no
precedent
for
bdr
1109
innovation
zone
legislation.
O
O
O
O
O
In
fact,
it
could
even
be
a
person
from
a
foreign
government
which
is
an
american
adversary.
There's
no
limitation.
There
is
a
concern.
The
focus
is
on
policy
and
not
on
the
person
in
1945,
the
nevada
legislature
created
the
first
state
gaming
license
and
tax
the
low
tax
rate
and
highly
lucrative
business
caught
the
attention
of
legitimate
and
non-legitimate
developers,
such
as
organized
crime,
the
mafia,
the
threat
of
federal
intervention
became
intimate.
O
It
took
nevada
decades
to
rid
the
state
of
the
mafia
and
organize
crime,
because
the
state
didn't
take
into
account
the
person
or
persons
who
would
own
operate
and
control
a
casino
in
today's
world,
stablecoin
and
cryptocurrency,
which
is
touted
by
the
innovation
zone.
Proponents
is
under
federal
investigation
in
a
may
13
2021
baron's
article
finance
is
under
federal
investigation,
bitcoin
coinbase
and
the
crypto
world
are
re
reeling.
The
article
states
regulators
have
long
had
concerns
that
cryptos
are
funding
illegal
activities
such
as
money
laundering
or
tax
evasion.
O
O
There
is
no
qualification.
The
person
has
to
have
prior
governmental
administration,
yet
they
will
build
a
government
from
scratch.
What
happens
when
the
person
passes
away?
Does
innovation
zone
remain,
in
effect,
what
if
the
land
located
in
the
innovation
zone
were
sold
or
inherited
by
someone
else?
O
O
The
third
concern
on
page
8
and
9
is
section
13.,
paragraph
1
b2
an
estimate
of
the
number
of
employees
what
they
have
once
some
of
the
things
that
the
innovation
zone
has
to
do.
They
have
to
provide
an
estimate
of
the
number
of
employees
anticipated
to
be
engaged
in
construction
of
infrastructure,
community
commercial
developments
and
residences
within
the
zone,
and
the
number
of
employees
anticipated
to
be
employed
by
businesses
within
the
zone
within
10
and
20
years
after
approval
of
the
creation
of
the
zone.
O
The
concern
is
that
the
bill
draft
requires
the
applicant
to
provide
10
and
20-year
information
on
the
number
of
employees
in
10
and
20-year
estimate
on
the
economic
impact
of
the
innovation
zone
to
be
provided
to
the
economic
development
director.
Tesla
was
also
required
to
provide
a
20-year
information
on
the
number
of
employees
in
economic
impact.
O
The
problem
is:
there's
no
accountability
in
a
75-year
economic
development
impact
study,
since
all
persons
deciding
on
the
project
would
not
even
be
here
by
then
a
10
and
20
year.
Economic
development
study
on
the
innovation
zone
should
be
provided
to
this
nevada
state
legislature
in
compliance
with
this
past
practice.
O
Our
concern
is
in
a
new
york
times.
Article
dated
november
1
2018,
entitled
quote
a
cryptocurrency
millionaire,
wants
to
build
a
utopia
in
nevada.
Unquote,
mr
burns
stated
quote:
he
has
spent
300
million
on
the
land
offices
planning
and
a
staff
of
70
people
unquote.
Therefore,
this
requirement
of
250
million
initial
investment.
It's
not
new
money.
O
O
O
The
sixth
concern
it's
on
pages,
eight,
nine
and
ten
section
thirteen,
and
I
think
this
is
what
assemblyman
watts
was
was
one
of
his
questions
was:
is
there's
no
requirement
for
a
feasibility
study
of
the
project
which
should
include
governmental,
financial
and
technological
feasibility
and
feasibility
of
adequate
water
resources
and
the
plan
and
financing
to
deliver
the
water
to
the
development
side?
There's
no
requirement
of
that.
All
they
have
to
do
is
certify
certified.
That
means
signature
and
a
piece
of
paper.
O
O
O
Our
eighth
concern
is
on
page
10,
section
13
2,
to
be
eligible
for
approval
as
an
innovation
zone.
The
proposed
area
must
a
consist
of
at
least
50
000,
contiguous
acres
of
undeveloped
land,
owned
or
controlled
by
the
applicant.
Just
like
I
stated
before.
Does
this
mean
a
person
who
owns
50,
000
or
more
contiguous
acres?
Could
lease
the
property
to
another
unknown
party
and
the
unknown
party
could
apply
for
the
innovation
zone?
O
Ninth
concern
pages
12
and
13,
section
16,
except,
is
otherwise
provided
in
this
chapter
upon
approval
of
an
application
to
create
an
innovation
zone.
One
the
innovation
zone
becomes
a
local
government
and
a
political
subdivision
of
the
state
with
the
powers
and
duties
of
a
county
separate
from
an
independent
of
the
county
in
which
it
is
located.
O
O
O
The
board
consists
of
three
members,
two
of
whom
must
be
appointed
from
a
list
of
at
least
five
nominees
proposed
by
the
applicant.
The
third
member
of
the
board
must
be
appointed
by
the
governor
based
upon
qualifications
and
experience
that
would
enable
the
person
appointed
to
carry
out
the
duties
of
the
board.
O
Our
concern
is
because
the
applicant
would
be
allowed
two
members
of
the
board
of
supervisor
to
be
their
nominee
out
of
three
members.
The
applicant
will
have
majority
control
over
the
board
of
supervisors
and
again,
the
pecuniary
interest
is
only
one
element.
You
can
still
have
control
over
people
without
pecunia
pecuniary
interests.
O
O
O
What,
if
eventually
or
early
on
what?
If
the
innovation
zone,
annex
those
properties,
if
the
zone
annexes
tesla
switch
in
google-
and
I'm
sorry,
it's
been
discussed
guys
if
they
annex
it
before
the
zone
is
ready
to
assume
all
of
the
duties
of
county
government.
Does
that
mean
tesla
switch
and
google
would
not
have
to
pay
sales
tax
or
property
tax
because
there
would
be
none
of
the
taxes
enacted
within
the
zone?
O
O
In
addition,
what
if
the
innovation
zone
were
able
to
annex
into
the
tahoe
reno
industrial
center
after
the
zone
assumes
all
of
the
duties
of
the
government
and
the
zone
was
able
to
levy
sales
and
property
tax?
Would
this
mean
the
unabated
taxes
from
these
companies
would
go
to
the
innovation
zone
and
not
to
story
county
taxpayers.
O
The
13th
concern
page
17,
section
20,
1
acceptance,
otherwise,
provided
in
section
19
of
this
act.
The
board
may
impose
any
taxes
or
fees
authorized
to
be
imposed
by
a
county
if
the
tax
or
fees
support
a
service
being
provided
by
the
county
in
which
the
innovation
zone
is
situated.
The
board
shall
provide
60
days
notice
to
the
county
of
the
intention
of
the
board
to
assume
responsibility
for
the
service
and
impose
the
tax
or
fee.
O
O
The
board
may
establish
the
justice
court
upon
the
establishment
of
a
justice
court.
The
zone
shall
be
deemed
a
township
for
the
purposes
of
chapter
4
of
nrs.
Until
the
board
establishes
a
justice
court,
the
zone
is
subject
to
the
jurisdiction
of
the
justice
court
for
the
township
in
which
the
innovation
zone
is
situated.
O
A
I'm
here
all
right
and
I
want
to
say
it
this
is
this
is
kind
of
still
under
five.
I
guess
it
would
be
d
impacts
under.
O
B
B
The
virginia
township
justice
court
is
a
court
within
the
first
judicial
district
of
nevada,
which
includes
story,
county
and
carson
city
story.
County
is
one
justice
of
the
peace.
That's
me
and
two
district
court
judges
to
oversee
cases.
I,
the
justice
of
the
peace,
handle
all
the
criminal
matters,
as
well
as
the
general
civil,
the
small
claims,
protection
orders
and
evictions.
B
I
basically
deal
with
all
the
harsh
realities
of
living
in
a
free
society
from
just
a
local
level.
I
have
some
concerns
about
placing
another
court
in
a
separate
area
of
jurisdiction
such
as
this
autonomous
zone,
when
the
zone's
intention
is
to
eventually
separate
from
the
county
and
after
reading
the
bill
draft.
B
The
most
glaring
problem
from
a
justice
standpoint
is
that
this
zone
intends
to
enter
into
the
business
of
administering
justice
and
its
board
once
appointed,
has
the
power
to
establish
a
justice
court
to
defeat
two,
as
miss
walker
said,
to
be
deemed
a
township
and
appoint
a
justice
of
peace
without
even
having
any
residents
within
that
township
and,
as
miss
walker
pointed
out
those
members
of
the
board,
they
might
not
even
be
u.s.
Citizens
and
they'll
be
appointing
a
justice
of
the
peace,
and
at
that
point
the
court
is
still
part
of
story.
B
B
The
real
problem
arises
when
the
threshold
of
a
100
registered
voters
within
the
zone
is
met,
so
it's
then
possible
when
I
see
it
for
a
hundred
people
to
elect
a
judge
who
must
administer
impartial
and
unbiased
decisions
within
this
zone.
That's
a
challenging
task
for
any
judge
and
how
does
a
judge
find
12,
impartial,
jurors
from
100
people
when
it
takes
about
70
people
just
to
seat
12
jurors?
B
So,
while
the
zone's
eventual
takeover
may
be
acceptable
for
many
facets
of
a
person's
life,
it's
a
completely
different
matter
when
it
comes
to
the
administration
of
justice,
which
is
an
essential
part
of
a
just
society.
An
affected
effective
legal
process
not
only
protects
suspects
and
defendants,
it
gives
victims
the
confidence
that
justice
will
be
done.
B
I
think
that
what
the
drafters
of
this
bill
overlook
is
that
justice
is
not
just
a
convenience.
It's
not
just
a
service,
it's
not
a
public
utility.
It's
a
fundamental
human
right
that
every
resident
of
that
zone
deserves.
B
It
appears
that
a
lot
of
work
needs
to
be
done
in
addressing
not
only
population
thresholds,
how
the
jp's
appointed
there's
so
many
levers
levels
of
this.
It's
it's
hard
to
address
right
now,
but
that's
whether
or
not
the
zone's
ability
to
properly
administer
justice
within
its
boundaries
is
very
questionable,
and
with
that
I
conclude
my
statement
and
I
say
thank
you
very
much.
O
A
Yes-
and
I
just
want
to
clarify-
because
I
clarified
with
my
legal-
I
know
we
don't
have
her
specifically
spelled
out,
but
it
as
a
speaker
or
the
judiciary
kind
of
on
here,
but
it
it
does
fit
under
other
governance
models.
O
O
Government
is
created
for
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
its
citizens,
not
solely
for
economic
development.
Our
16th
concern
is
on
page
19
and
20
of
the
bdr
section
22
2
paragraph
2.
It
states
the
board
may
create
one
or
more
of
the
offices
specified
in
subsection
one
as
innovation
zone
office
and
may
consolidate
the
office
into
one
or
more
offices
if
it
finds
that
such
consolidation
would
be
in
the
best
interest
of
the
innovation
zone.
O
O
O
O
What
if
there
was
a
hit
and
run
in
the
innovation
zone
county?
What?
If
there's
witnesses,
who
file
a
complaint
against
a
party
in
this
innovation
zone
county
because
but
because
the
sheriff
is
also
the
district
attorney,
he
decides,
there's
no
evidence
because
the
perpetrator
was
actually
his
brother-in-law
he's
protecting
his
brother-in-law.
O
Local
governments
provide
building
permits
and
have
third-party
inspectors
inspect.
Building
construction
to
ensure
they
comply
with
the
building
codes
and
that
the
building
is
actually
safe
if
a
private
business,
constructing
commercial
or
residential
buildings
is
also
its
own
building
inspector,
where
are
the
checks
and
balances
who
is
ensuring
the
buildings
are
safe?
O
Our
17th
concern
on
pages
29
and
34.
This
deals
with
the
sea
tax,
so
I'll
get
into
more
more
about
that.
But,
madam
chairman,
I
appreciate
you
having
a
future
discussion
about
this,
because
it's
very
complicated
and-
and
I
appreciate
your
thoughtfulness
on
it
in
in
section
31
paragraph
one-
it
states
for
the
purposes
of
distribution
from
the
local
government
tax
distribution
account
created
pursuant
to
nrs
360.660.
O
taxes
collected
within
an
innovation
zone
must
be
returned
to
the
innovation
zone
in
the
matter
provided
in
nrs
360.680,
and
then
they
go
ahead
and
change
in
section
38
360.680
and
they
state
on
or
before
july
1
of
each
year.
The
executive
director
shall
allocate
to
each
a
innovation
zone
the
amount
deposited
in
the
account
from
the
taxes
imposed
within
the
zone
in
the
immediately
proceeding
fiscal
year.
Here's
the
concern
these
two
sections
would
allow
the
bccrt
and
sccrt
local
sales
taxes,
that's
a
major
source
of
revenue
for
counties
and
cities
and
local
governments.
O
O
O
As
I
read
this,
the
it
would
actually
be
at
the
time
that
the
executive
director
of
economic
development
approves
the
the
innovation
zone.
It's
at
that
time
that
the
sea
tax
will
go
permanently
to
the
innovation
zone,
it's
not
later
on.
When
they
decide
to
take
all
of
the
services
it's
up
front,
they
would
be
taking
it.
O
O
It's
not
only
that,
but
it's
it's.
It's
the
loss
of
the
future
growth
of
story
county
and
it's
tax
revenues,
and
I'm
very
concerned
that,
if
the
if
the
innovation
zone,
annexes
tesla,
google
and
switch
properties
because
they're
right
next
door,
the
local
sales
taxes
which
the
sccrt
and
bccrt
once
they're
no
longer
abated,
they
would
go
to
the
innovation
zone
and
not
to
the
straight
county
taxpayers.
O
O
The
last
concern
on
on
page
29
is
section
321.
If,
on
january,
1
of
any
year
in
which
a
general
election
is
held,
the
county,
clerk
or
registrar
of
voters
determines
that
there
are
a
hundred
or
more
registered
voters
residing
within
the
innovation
zone.
Innovation
zone
must
conduct
elections,
as
provided
in
this
section.
The
clerk
or
registrar
shall
notify
the
board
and
transmit
all
necessary
information
concerning
the
registered
voters
in
the
district,
the
board
or
the
clerk
for
the
zone.
If
one
has
been
appointed
shall
conduct
the
election.
O
O
Will
the
applicant
and
or
innovation
zone
board
members
want
to
see
control
over
the
government
and
give
it
to
the
citizens
to
control
via
the
vote
and
assemblyman
watts
had
a
very
good
point?
He
said
he
was
talking
about
the
property
taxes
and,
and
it
would
how
the
freezing
of
the
property
taxes
would
would
be
an
incentive
for
the
innovation
zone
to
to
take
over
all
of
the
services.
O
I
I
guess
what
I
would
say
to
that
is
the
property.
Taxes
are
a
very
small
part
of
many
local
governments.
Revenue
sources,
it's
it's,
not
the
big
potatoes.
The
big
potatoes
are
the
the
sales
tax
taxes
that
we're
worried
about.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
that
would
really
be
an
incentive
for
them
to
to
move
earlier
to
have
the
vote
at
the
reedy
creek
improvement
district
in
florida,
disney
world
decided
not
to
have
residents
because
they
didn't
want
to
lose
control
over
governing
the
improvement
district.
Will
that
be
the
same
with
the
innovation
zone?
O
O
O
Government
typically
plays
that
role,
for
example,
protecting
the
victims
of
a
crime
when
a
private
person
or
business
may
try
to
keep
the
crime
from
surfacing
because
would
make
them
look
bad.
They
need
me
more
concerned
about
their
corporate
image
than
providing
the
health
safety
and
welfare
of
its
citizens
and
employees.
O
It's
a
tremendous
conflict
of
interest.
There
are
many
real
world
examples
regarding
the
reedy
creek
improvement
district
and
how
it's
spent
more
time
and
effort
protecting
the
corporate
image
than
protecting
its
own
employees
or
citizens.
There's
lots
of
articles
in
the
orlando
sentinel
on
that
we
need.
We
should
learn
from
this,
and
I
would
urge
you
to
vote
against
bdr1109.
A
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
mr
osborne,
I
know
that
we
story
county
has
a
commission
meeting
at
four,
so
we're
at
two
o'clock,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
all
cognizant
of
time.
I
do
want
to
open
it
up
for
questions
for
mrs
walker
from
committee
members.
E
Oh
yeah,
okay,
thank
you.
Our
commission
meeting
is
actually
going
to
be
okay,
it
is
at
four
o'clock,
but
we
have
a
quorum
of
the
board
and
a
light
agenda.
So
we
can
continue
on
today.
K
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
This
is
more
of
a
comment,
better
question.
I
really
want
to
thank
miss
walker
for
her
presentation.
K
It
actually
gives
me
more
questions
than
answers
and
I'm
sure
we'll
be
discussing
a
lot
of
this
in
the
future,
but
I
can
tell
that
a
lot
of
work
went
into
this
and
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
so
this
time,
what
we'll
do
is
we'll,
I
think,
we're
gonna
go
on
to
item
d,
which
is
next,
I'm
gonna
I've
gotta
step
out
for
just
a
quick
second,
so
I'm
gonna
allow
assemblyman
watts
to
do
the
introduction
on
itemd
and
I'll
be
right.
P
Afternoon
committee
members,
I
apologize,
my
camera
is
non-functional
for
some
reason.
Can
everybody
hear
me?
Okay,.
P
Proceed
story:
county
sheriff
gerald
antonio,
the
record
a
lot
of,
or
several
of
my
concerns
are
outlined
in
the
correspondence
that
I
submitted
not
necessarily
going
to
read
through
that
verbatim.
P
But
we'll
talk
about
the
various
concerns
and
several
have
been
already
discussed
today
and-
and
a
lot
of
that
has
to
do
with
the
funding
of
it
and
understand
that
there's
a
tax
base
of
all
that,
but,
as
we've
seen
the
need
sometimes
outpaces
the
the
resources
available
to
us.
P
You
know,
as
the
industrial
center
built
out
the
the
tahoe
reno
industrial
center
built
out,
you
know
we
were
able
to
kind
of
grow
with
it.
Depending
on
what
the
developer
does
on
this.
You
know
it
could
explode
overnight.
It
could
drag
on
for
the
70
years
plus
you
know.
Maybe
it's
going
to
be
a
slow
growth
controlled.
P
Maybe
it's
not
if
we
have
that
explosive
growth,
what
is
going
to
cover
the
the
funding
resources
needed
for
public
safety
to
keep
up
with
that,
because
the
the
standard
tax
base
is
not,
but
yet
we
still
have
to
provide
a
service
to
folks,
I
know
with
other
heavy
draws.
There
are
agreements
with
developers
as
far
as
you
know,
additional
funding
from
them,
regardless
of
abatements
or
anything
to
pay
for
the
the
extra
burden
that
is
placed
on
public
safety.
There's
been
no
discussion
of
anything
of
that
nature
that
I've
seen
in
this.
P
I
I
think
assembly,
settlement
or
senator
settlement
excuse
me
asked
about
being
a
provider
of
last
resort.
This
bdr
allows
for
the
innovation
zone
to
assume
some.
P
It
is
a
very
real
possibility,
as
people
are
struggling
for
dollars
or
wanting
to
expand,
and
then
what
happens
if
that
contract
expires
isn't
renewed,
they
have
to
go
out
for
new
resources.
Does
that
default
back
to
the
host
county?
So
senator
settlemyre's
question
is:
is
one
that
still
weighs
heavy
as
far
as
are
we
a
provider
of
last
resort?
P
You
know
other.
There
were
financial
issues
that
were
brought
up,
assemblyman
watts.
I
believe
you
brought
it
up
as
far
as
the
impact
to
bonding
and
and
the
financial
stability
of
story
county.
You
know,
as
this
develops
out,
should
they
not
take
over
resources,
law
enforcement
resources
in
very
short
order,
and
we
have
to
expand
the
sheriff's
office
abilities
right
now.
My
nearest
substation
is
on
the
opposite
side
of
the
county,
from
where
the
innovation
zone
is
going
to
be.
Would
we
have
to
build
a
new
substation?
P
The
county
jail
is
at
the
far
side
of
the
county
from
the
innovation
zone.
Would
we
have
to
build
a
new
holding
facility
buildings
such
as
that
cost
millions
of
dollars
to
build?
That
would
have
an
impact
that
would
change
greatly
from
what
our
county
indebtedness
is
right
now,
if
we
had
to
start
building
structures
like
that
and
then
with
the
different
boards,
the
county
commission
versus
the
board
of
supervisors,
what
standards
are
we
building
to
and
and
if
the
day
comes,
that
the
innovation
zone
wants
to
take
over
those
services?
P
What
happens
to
our
investment?
If
they
don't
want
it,
we're
no
longer
there
it
does.
It
serves
no
purposes
to
the
people
of
story
county
if
they
don't
want
it.
Yet
we've
spent
millions
of
dollars.
We
may
still
be
paying
for
those
buildings
when
we're
no
longer
even
there.
So
those
are
all
funding
issues
that
are
of
concern
in
the
provisions
of
law
enforcement
services
to
the
innovation
zone
in
the
in
the
bdr.
P
It
talks
about
an
applicant
having
to
have
fifty
contiguous,
acre
acres
to
be
eligible
for
this.
Has
anybody
given
any
thought
to
what
that
does
to
the
existing
county,
because
it
it
divides
story,
county
up
outside
of
the
innovation
zone,
into
eight
non-contiguous
areas?
P
And
so
now
I've
got
issues
in
virginia
city,
but
I
also
have
a
small
segment
of
story:
county
population
that's
far
removed
from
anything
out
in
painted
rocks,
surrounded
by
innovation
zone.
There's
the
the
tahoe
reno
industrial
center
that
is
currently
developed,
comstock
meadows
area,
that
is
in
the
process
of
development.
P
Those
are
areas
surrounded
by
the
innovation
zone
that
would
be
outside
of
the
innovation
zone,
creating
a
logistical
nightmare
to
try
and
provide
services
to
not
that
we
wouldn't
or
that
we
couldn't,
but
it
really
provides
a
lot
of
burden
and,
as
the
innovation
zone
takes
over
those
services,
we've
all
heard
of
cross-jurisdictional
issues
or
deconfliction.
P
You
know
I've
got
deputies
running
from
one
area
of
story
county
across
miles
of
another
jurisdiction
to
get
to
another
area
of
story
county
to
provide
emergency
services
or
law
enforcement
services
of
any
nature,
and
where
my
people
would
not
necessarily
be
patrolling
the
the
innovation
zone
on
a
regular
basis,
they
may
not
be
familiar
with
how
it
is.
While
we
still
would
proceed
with
new
caution,
you
can
see
the
problem
of
if
we're
crossing
through
another
jurisdiction,
responding
to
an
emergency
in
the
county.
P
It's
much
like
we
deal
with
now
on
a
very
minimal
basis
if
we
have
to
run
from
one
end
of
story
county
to
the
other,
through
washoe
county
through
lyon
county.
You
know
this
amplifies
that
by
a
great
magnitude
having
all
these
different
parkings
of
stories.
P
P
There's
a
whole
lot
of
those
things
that
that
don't
rise
to
the
state
level
and
local
jurisdiction,
including
the
innovation
zone,
where
there
could
be
a
lot
of
confusion,
a
lot
of
issues
back
and
forth.
While
story
county
is
still
providing
services
to
the
innovation
zone.
But
yet
they
have
already
embanked
the
board
of
supervisors,
who
is
now
creating
their
own
ordinance
and
rules
and
regulations.
P
So
those
those
are
all
concerns
to
the
sheriff's
office
and
well
well,
not
specific
necessarily
to
the
sheriff's
office
function,
but
because
I,
like
all
of
you,
have
taken
an
oath
to
uphold
and
protect
defend
the
constitution
of
our
state
and
the
united
states.
I
have
to
point
out
that
in
the
language
of
the
bdr
that
the
legislature
would
be
abdicating
its
own
authority
to
the
innovation
zone
board
of
supervisors,
where
section
32
of
the
nevada
constitution
gives
the
legislature
the
power
to
increase,
diminish,
consolidate
or
abolish
county
offices.
P
You
know
by
by
allowing
the
innovation
zone
to
do
that,
you're,
giving
away
the
constitutional
authority
of
the
legislature
and
you're
giving
them
more
power
than
even
what
a
newly
elected
board
of
county
commissioners
have
right
now.
If
our
county
commissioners
want
to
combine
decrease,
diminish,
do
away
with,
they
have
to
go
to
you
folks,
down
there
in
carson
city
and
say
hey.
This
is
why
we
want
to
do
it:
you're,
empowering
the
board
of
supervisors
with
constitutional
authority,
that's
vested
with
the
legislature.
P
F
All
right,
thank
you.
I
think
what
we'll
do
is
hear
from
the
story:
county
fire
district
and
then
we'll
open
it
up
for
any
questions
that
members
have
about
public
safety.
L
I'm
jeremy
long
carmen
fire
chief
of
story,
county
fire
protection
district,
and
I
know,
as
just
stated
earlier,
that
through
more
and
more
presentations,
more
and
more
questions
arise,
and
unfortunately,
I'm
just
going
to
add
to
that
list,
because
I
have
quite
a
few
questions
and
concerns
of
my
own
I'll
start
by
saying
throughout
the
year
story,
county
fire
protection
district
has
already
made
vast
changes
to
keep
up
with
growth
and
innovation.
Currently
within
story
county,
we
pride
ourselves
in
ensuring
that
our
staff
is
properly
trained
to
mitigate
all
emergencies.
L
We
pride
ourselves
on
working
closely
with
developers
and
companies
to
ensure
that
we
have
the
appropriate
equipment,
staffing
and
code
compliant
buildings
for
the
safety
of
their
workers,
visitors
and
my
staff
working
within
the
traditional
means
of
development
that
story
county
currently
conducts.
We
continue
to
make
safe
buildings
safe
communities
and
ensure
that
each
district
is
adequately
covered
with
fire
stations,
equipment
and
personnel
with
a
separate
government
such
as,
what's
proposed
within
the
concept
of
the
innovation
zone,
we're
presented
with
numerous
concerns.
L
L
L
What
happens
to
my
staff
that
I
hire
to
to
man
that
station
that's
going
to
protect
the
innovation
zone
with
staffing
alone,
it's
hard
to
find
qualified
people,
so
we
take
in
a
lot
of
people,
we
train
them.
We
make
very
hefty
investments
in
our
folks
to
make
sure
they're
safe
and
they
can
do
their
job
efficiently.
L
What's
going
to
happen
to
these
people
are
the
buildings
going
to
be
built
to
code?
You
know,
but
not
also
just
code,
but
with
operational
concerns
addressed
as
most
you
know,
fire
codes
are
generally
written
in
blood.
It's
through
tragedy
that
they're
created,
and
just
like
the
same
and
earlier
about
the
road
width,
there's
a
reason
why
we
need
26
foot
for
a
ladder
truck
and
there's
a
reason
why
we
continue
to
insist
that
we
have
26
foot
because
story.
County
alone
cannot
take
care
of
some
of
the
emergencies
within
our
county.
L
L
These
are
just
a
couple
of
concerns.
We
have
with
this
untraditional
approach
to
development,
while
story
county
fire
protection
district
openly
welcomes
residential
commercial
and
industrial
development
within
our
county.
The
separation
of
government
and
concepts
stated
pose
serious
public
safety
concerns.
L
First,
it
is
financially
irresponsible
for
me
to
use
story,
county
fire
protection,
district
money
to
make
large
capital
infrastructure
investments
in
the
innovation
zone
and
possibly
lose
it,
but
it's
also
morally
and
legally
wrong
for
me
not
to
provide
these
services
to
anyone
within
the
county.
This
puts
us
within
a
unique
and
awkward
position.
L
We
also
have
some
concerns
about
liability
issues.
As
some
of
these
functions
of
government
get
shifted
over
who
would
dispatch
us
to
the
innovation
zone,
you
know:
are
we
going
to
have
our
law
enforcement
partners
with
us
on
emergencies,
and
those
partners
are
the
ones
we
train
with
we
work
with.
We
know
them
by
first
name
basis
and
we
rely
on
them.
L
You
know
just
taking
dispatch
alone,
just
in
the
change
in
communications
alone,
here
with
in
northwestern
nevada,
we've
all
undergone
big
and
very
costly
upgrades.
Are
they
going
to
be
compatible
if
there's
a
failure
in
the
dispatch
system
or
the
compatibility
of
the
radio
system
who's
liable?
These
concerns
merely
scratch
the
surface
of
potential
problems.
Faced
with
a
separate
government,
we
have
a
system
in
place,
it's
dynamic,
it's
innovative,
it's
successful
and
it's
proven
tri-center
would
not
exist.
A
thinking.
Ideas
were
not
applied
within
this
county.
L
We're
successful
and
welcome
world
tech
leaders
to
our
county
through
our
existing
process.
We
do
look
forward
to
working
with
companies
such
as
blockchains
and
welcome
them
to
the
county.
However,
there's
great
concern
for
public
safety.
We
cannot
simply
just
jeopardize
by
allowing
them
separation
in
government.
L
F
F
All
right
seeing
none
again,
thank
you
for
providing
those
comments
to
us,
and
with
that
I
see
the
chair
is
back,
so
I
will
turn
the
gavel
back
over
to
madam
chair.
A
Thank
you
so
much
assemblyman
once
I
appreciate
that.
I
believe
we
are
on
e
now,
which
would
be
the
impact
on
k-12
schools.
We
have
superintendent
hess
with
us.
L
H
B
L
Much
madam
chair
and
thank
you
for
filling
in
assemblyman
watts,
I'm
sitting
with
kristen
chandler
our
business
manager
for
story,
county
school
district.
L
My
name
is
todd
hass
superintendent
of
story,
county
school
district,
it's
always
great
to
be
put
nearly
last
on
the
agenda
of
an
all-day
meeting.
So
I
immediately
and
jokingly
blamed
mr
peternot
for
that
one
and
I'll
start
by
saying
that
I'm
proudly
a
sixth
generation
nevadan
every
single
one
of
those
in
story
county.
L
I
believe
in
the
county,
we're
very
proud
of
trek,
the
tahoe
reno
industrial
center
and
what
the
leading
edge
companies
have
quickly
become
attracted
to
also
very
proud
of
our
story:
county
leadership
currently
and
in
the
past.
That
includes
my
brother
bond,
who
is,
commissioner,
when
the
park
was
literally
in
its
infant
infancy,
the
people
that
had
the
park
at
the
time
lance
gilman
and
roger
norman
who
started
it?
You
know
they
both
told
me
over
and
over
that
it
was
story,
county's,
speed
and
versatility.
L
That
is
the
major
attractant
for
these
companies
within
story
county.
I'm
also
very
excited
for
the
tremendous
vision
and
optimism
of
blockchains,
not
only
for
story
county,
but
what
the
future,
including
really
the
future
of
mankind,
could
be.
I'm
honestly
asked
about
this
subject
quite
a
lot,
so
I'm
here
not
to
only
address
school
board
and
community
concerns
about
the
effect
of
the
proposed
innovation
zone
on
story
county,
but
also
is
to
get
educated
on
the
matter
as
I
can
so
I
can
communicate
that
best
with
the
good
folks
here
in
the
county.
L
I
can
say
that
I
had
a
direct
seat
during
the
development
of
story,
county's
recent
master
plan.
I
think
it
took
about
seven
years
to
fully
develop
that
plan.
County
manager,
austin
osborne's,
the
one
that
took
care
of
that
it
was
approved
by
our
school
board
and
then
got
the
final
stamp
by
the
story:
county
board
of
commissioners.
L
That
plan
has
the
current
largest
available
residential
zone
of
around
2
100
acres
in
painted
rock
I'm
sure.
Austin.
Will
talk
about
that
a
bit
more
so
specifically
relating
to
the
functions
of
schools
with
within
the
innovation
zone?
My
probably
rhetorical
questions
at
this
point
would
be
as
follows,
and
you
know
they're
pretty
similar
to
what
sheriff
antonoro
and
fire
chief
long
car
hit
on
senator
settlemyre
also
referenced
some
of
this
as
well.
But
what
would
be
the
financial
obligation
for
story
county
school
district?
Initially,
this
would
require
approval
approval
from
our
school
board.
L
L
We
also
have
that
would
also
have
to
transport
and
we'd
also
increase
district
office
personnel.
So
my
question
is:
if
we
enter
into
contracts,
attract,
retain
and
get
these
people
enter
into
contract
with
them.
What
would
happen
if
there's
an
agreement
with
a
different
district?
They
are
good,
neighbors,
lying
or
washoe.
Potentially
a
charter,
or
maybe
a
hybrid
model
of
some
sort,
comes
in.
What
would
happen
to
these
people?
Are
they
rift
is
a
reduction
of
force?
Are
they
terminated?
L
L
In
closing,
these
are
some
of
the
initial
questions
and
concerns
regarding
school
operations
that
we
have
within
story
county
then
potentially
transferred
to
the
innovation
zone.
I
sincerely
appreciate
the
time,
thoughtfulness
and
effort
by
any
by
everyone
on
this
joint
special
committee.
I
believe
as
again
as
a
as
a
lifelong
story,
county
resident.
It's
a
true
compliment
to
all
of
you
and
your
leadership
skills
to
have
been
appointed
to
this
and
sincerely.
L
A
Thank
you
so
much
for
this
at
this
time.
Any
questions
for
superintendent
hess
from
committee
members.
A
Okay,
I
see
none.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
time.
All
right,
I
think
we're
moving
into
f,
which
is
discussions
related
to
story,
county's
population
economics
and
fish,
fiscal
conditions
and
projections.
I
believe
we
have
mr
osborne
queued
up
our
story:
county
manager,
along
with
jennifer,
mccain,
the
comptroller
and
then
mr
hess
up
to
bat
a
second
time.
I
guess,
with
conversations
again
or
more
of
a,
I
guess,
economic
side
of
story,
county
or
you'll
just
be
on
hand
to
answer
questions.
I
guess
mr
hesser,
you
let
us
know
mr
osborne.
E
E
If
you
want
I'll
give
you
all
a
moment
to
find
that
document,
and
let
me
know
when
you
feel
you
would
like
me
to
get
started.
E
Okay,
all
right,
thank
you
today.
I'm
gonna
point
us
to
our
second
slide
number
two,
I'm
gonna
move
this
over
here,
so
I
can
see
that-
and
this
is
really
what
we're
here
to
discuss
today.
These
are
the
objectives
for
this
presentation
and
I'm
going
to
read
them
verbatim,
but
I'm
not
going
to
do
a
lot
of
that
in
this
presentation
for
number
one.
E
E
This
is
completely
dovetailed
into
what
we
do
here
in
story
county
and
what
we
have
here
coming
up
will
hopefully
answer
questions
you
might
have
in
that
regard,
so
I'm
going
to
go
to
slide
number
three
and
I'm
going
to
hold
up
a
couple
maps
just
to
make
sure
kind
of
the
point
is
made
on
this.
So
this
one
here
is
in
front
of
you
and
really
what
we're
dealing
with
right
now
is
innovation
zone
number
one?
This
is
a
statewide
matter.
E
One
thing
is
the
map
on
the
right
with
all
of
the
yellow
lines,
that's
about
to
the
area,
roughly,
that
covers
the
innovation
zone
in
story
county
and
then
the
overlay
on
top
of
reno
and
sparks
really
is
only
provided
to
provide
scale.
It's
not
necessarily
to
say
this
is
going
to
happen
in
reno,
or
anything
like
that.
Just
to
kind
of
show
you
here
to
take
acre
by
acre
approximately
how
big
it
would
be
in
the
neighboring
community
and
then
because
we
have
folks
from
the
south
with
us.
E
On
the
next
one
is
a
fiscal
snapshot.
We
want
to
provide
you
all
just
a
little
bit
about
how
big
story
county
is
fiscally
as
far
as
revenues,
expenditures
and
then
talk
a
little
bit
about
some
abatements
too,
and
I'm
going
to
ask
that
we
pass
the
torch
over
to
comptroller
jennifer
mccain.
She
would
be
happy
to
walk
through
the
next
couple,
slides
with
you
in
that.
B
My
mute
good
afternoon,
madam
chairman,
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
give
you
a
small
example
of
what
story:
county's
revenues
and
expenses
look
like
on
slide.
Seven.
What
you
see
before
you
is
the
2020
audited,
a
simple
pie,
chart
of
where
our
revenues
are.
As
you
can
see,
our
major
component
of
our
county's
revenue
is
property
tax,
both
residential
and
commercial.
B
If
we
move
on
to
the
next
slide
the
expenses
taking
into
account
that
2020
was
the
crazy
year
that
the
pandemic
fell
on
us,
our
revenues
are
slightly
higher,
as
you
can
see
than
our
expenses,
because
we
did
scale
back
quite
a
lot
to
make
sure
not
knowing
what
was
going
to
happen
during
that
time.
B
B
However,
it
is
important
to
note
that
this
is
an
ongoing
expense
of
the
county,
as
the
audits
are
completed
by
an
additional
outside
auditor.
If
we
move
on
to
page
eight
the
abatement
slide,
this
gives
you
a
little
example
of
the
kind
of
money
that
has
been
abated
over
the
last
few
years.
The
cumulative
abatements
are
from
2008
to
2019,
and
these
have
been
prepared
and
presented
by
edon
and
goad
to
show
the
kind
of
abatements
that
go
across
the
state
for
properties
within
story
county
as
well.
E
So
then,
I'm
going
to
take
us
I'm
going
to
continue
on
and
we're
on
slide
number
10
at
this
point,
and
the
title
should
be
business
background
and
there's
going
to
be
a
minor
amendment
on
this.
It
says
1999
to
2000.
It
should
be
1990
to
2000..
So
this
is
we're
not
going
back
to
the
days
of
the
comstock,
but
we're
going
back
to
kind
of
the
modern
history
of
story.
E
County
and
brief,
and
really
what's
important
here
is
from
1990
to
2000
was
a
period
of
time
when
story
county,
as
well
as
northern
nevada,
had
experienced
a
significant
shift
in
its
economy.
Northern
nevada
had
seen
a
shift
in
gaming
to
other
organizations
and
jurisdictions
across
the
united
states
and
reno,
and
las
vegas
were
hit
very
hard,
as
those
who've
lived
here
for
quite
some
time
remember:
story:
county
in
virginia
city
got
overflow
tourism
from
that
gaming
industry.
E
We
believe
the
majority
of
the
folks
that
came
up
here
were
people
that
were
visiting
reno
tahoe
and
they
would
come
up
for
a
day
trip
to
this
area
and
really
our
economy
up.
Here
was
day
tourism.
It
was
seasonal,
it
was
volatile,
but
it
was
just
enough
to
keep
the
county
going
at
the
time
we
had
roughly
six
to
eight
hundred
people
depending
on
what
year
you
look
at,
and
then
there
was
a
major
part
of
story.
E
Counties
passed
at
the
time
was
the
joke
and
forty
brothels,
and
you
can
look
at
the
history
of
it.
It's
quite
interesting
but,
as
you
know,
in
the
90s
joke
and
40
left
the
country
in
seeking
asylum
in
brazil
and
with
them
came
a
significant
amount
of
tax
dollars
that
the
county
relied
on
at
the
time,
and
that
was
it.
There
was
nothing
else.
There
was
some
agriculture,
and
that
was
it,
maybe
a
small
amount
of
mining
and
so
the
county.
E
The
legislature
around
2000
was
already
looking
at
carving
up
the
school
district
and
the
kids
were
going
to
be
sent
to
reno
or
washoe
county
lyon,
county
and
even
carson
city,
and
then
the
county
as
a
whole
was
also
being
on
the
chopping
block.
For
the
same
now,
we
were
not
the
only
county
in
this
situation.
Other
rural
counties
in
the
state
were
enduring
the
same
problem,
so
the
county
had
to
do
something
about
this.
E
E
So
on
this
one,
I'm
going
to
show
another
map.
So
here
we
all
know
what
this
picture
is:
we've
seen
it
similarly,
but
this
was
the
old
azamara
ranch.
It
was
roughly
107
000
acres,
a
lot
of
it's
mountainous,
some
of
it's
flat,
but
that
land
was
for
sale
at
the
time
and
there
was
discussion
about
what
maybe
we
could
do
to
diversify
the
economy
of
story
county
and
happened
to
be
about
the
same
time
that
roger
norman
and
lance
gilman
came
to
town,
and
this
was
right
around
the
time
they
were
finishing
up.
E
The
south
meadows
reno
planned
unit
development
that
some
people
or
some
of
us
may
live
in
today.
E
Well,
roger
and
lance
are
finishing
up
that
project
and
story
county
was
looking
at
a
new
way
to
invent
itself,
there's
a
third
person
involved,
and
it
was
our
building
official
dean
haymore
at
the
time
that
the
county
commissioners
kind
of
sent
him
on
a
journey
to
find
a
way
to
reinvent
story.
County
and
all
these
three
pieces
seemed
to
come
together
right
at
the
right
time,
and
the
folks
got
together
and
roger
had
purchased
the
azimura
ranch,
and
there
was
some
talk
at
the
time
of
creating
a
hummer
test
park.
E
There
was
discussion
about
maybe
a
wildlife
refuge.
These
are
things
I
remember
reading
in
the
paper
myself
up
here,
not
really
knowing
the
dynamic
that
was
going
on
in
that
area,
and
then
there
was
a
discussion
with
dean
haymore
about
maybe
creating
some
kind
of
an
industrial
park
along
the
interstate
80
corridor.
What
would
be
a
better
place
to
do
than
out
there?
E
So
a
lot
of
things
happened
during
that
time
and
the
county
commissioners
had
tasked
dean
with
creating
a
master
plan
and
a
zoning
ordinance
county
didn't
have
any
staff
didn't
have
any
resources,
so
dean
went
to
the
university
of
nevada
reno
and
got
students
to
put
together
these
documents,
and
every
student
took
an
area
and
created
something
in
the
county.
Commission
approved
it
and
put
together
a
planning
commission
to
review
it
as
well,
and
I'm
going
to
turn
over
to
slide
number
14..
E
And
this
is
an
important
slide.
This
was
before
tahoe
reno
industrial
center,
the
annexed
or
the
development
agreement
was
created,
but
this
is
a
building.
This
is
calcan.
This
was
one
of
our
first,
it's
a
dog
food
factory
and
they
came
out
to
story
county
we're
recruited
by
lance
roger
and
with
dean,
as
maybe
hey,
let's
bring
a
company
out
here
and
let's
get
started
and
dean
haymore
was
driving
around
this
guy
in
the
back
of
an
old
police
car.
E
That's
what
story
county
had
you
know
pretty
much
bald
tires
and
really
rough
and
dean's
driving
this
guy
around
and
he
doesn't
realize
who's
in
the
back
seat
of
this
car
until
he
introduces
himself
as
forest
marsh
and
so
he's
got
forest
mars
and
the
owner
of
calcan
or
mars
calcan
at
the
time
driving
around
and
mars
falls
in
love
with
the
idea
of
creating
some
kind
of
industry
out
here,
buys
his
property
and
builds
his
facility.
E
The
slate
15
has
another
map
and
it's
pretty
much
the
asamera
ranch,
but
it
also
shows
some
other
detail,
so
it
shows
tri-center
in
blue
and
what
tri-center
is
is
in
blue
is
actually
the
area
that
is
the
tahoe
reno
industrial
center.
Today,
not
the
entire
yellow
area.
The
yellow
area
is
in
the
master
plan
as
designated
to
be
potentially
annexed
into
tri-center
and
become
tri-center,
but
most
of
it
or
very
much
of
it,
is
undevelopable.
It's
very
high
topography,
mountainous
canyons
things
like
that.
E
It
might
be
good
for
wind
energy
there's
some
other
ideas,
but
mostly
for
big
box,
employment
and
stuff.
Pretty
minimal
blockchains
does
own
the
property.
Now
they
bought
it
as
part
of
the
67
000
acre
purchase,
but
that
kind
of
gives
you
some
scale
here
of
what
the
industrial
center
is
in
respect
to
the
region,
as
opposed
to
kind
of
the
famous
map.
We
see
a
lot
and
then
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
painted
rock
up
there
in
the
corner.
That
block
chains
also
owns.
E
And
so
in
this
map
there
was
kind
of
a
discussion
that
had
come
between
roger
norman
and
the
county
commissioners
and
lance
and
dean
about
the
idea
of
how
do
we
create
this
industrial
park?
We
have
one
building
or
two,
but
how
do
we
do
something?
That's
really
revolutionary,
something
that's
innovative
and
something
that
is
a
little
different
than
what's
been
done
in
nevada
before,
and
so
they
created
a
private
public
partnership
and
what
they
did
initially
on
page
six
or
slide
number
six.
E
They
created
a
development
agreement
or
like
a
contract
between
the
county
and
between
roger
norman
and
what
they
did
is
roger
norman,
had
something
the
county
didn't
and
the
county
had.
Something
roger
did
not
roger
had
money
and
he
had
a
will
and
he
wanted
to
build
something
pretty
much
like
what
you
see
right
now
with
a
chains
group
they've
got
a
vision.
They
want
to
create
something
amazing
and
they're
coming
to
the
county,
looking
at
a
way
to
happen
and
the
county
had.
What
roger
did
not.
E
It
was
lots
of
land
and
lots
of
entitlements,
and
so
the
county
and
roger
got
together
and
said:
why
don't
we
create
something
where
roger
you
buy
the
land?
And
then
you
put
the
infrastructure
in
up
front
and
then
create
a
build
to
suit
environment.
Roger
says
yeah.
I
can
do
that
all
day
long,
but
what
kind
of
restrictions
are
there
going
to
be?
What
kind
of
things
are
going
to
prevent
me
from
being
successful?
E
Well,
the
county
commissioners
at
the
time
said
how
about
we
create
something
that
makes
that
nothing
and
what
the
county
had
was
give
roger
entitlements.
They
gave
him
a
zoning
ordinance
that
I'll
talk
about
in
a
minute
1999
it's
frozen
for
50
years.
They
gave
him
a
insurance
that
okay,
you
put
the
infrastructure
in
up
front,
but
the
county
is
going
to
pay
you
back
for
that
infrastructure
over
50
years.
E
The
interest
will
be
zero,
we'll
talk
about
that
in
a
minute,
but
roger
has
to
put
the
money
up
front,
but
he
gets
the
money
back
over
a
50-year
period
of
time.
There
were
some
other
things
like
why?
Don't
we
create
an
over-the-counter
commercial
zoning
ordinance
that
wasn't
something?
That's
typically
done,
but
it's
allowable
under
nrs
and
under
the
development
agreement.
Right
now
we
have
burger
king
taco
bell
studio.
E
Six
subway,
marriott
hotels
is
on
its
way
and
we
have
part
of
subs
as
well
as
other
commercial
uses,
these
businesses
developed
on
industrial
zone
land
and
how
they
got
the
commercial
zoning
is.
They
came
to
me
as
the
planning
director
at
the
time
and
now
as
county
manager
with
my
staff,
and
they
ask
for
the
zoning
and
they
get
a
permit
right
over
the
top
of
the
counter.
That's
signed
off
by
tri-center
as
well
the
fastest
commercial
zoning
that
we
created
in
story.
E
E
So
I'm
going
to
go
to
the
next
slide.
It
is
slide
17
and
it
looks
like
this.
It's
a
simple
slide,
but
it's
an
important
slide.
These
are
really
kind
of
the
innovative
features
of
the
development
agreement
that
roger
norm
and
his
group
and
the
story
county
commissioners
approved
is
a
50-year
agreement
for
50
years.
Whatever
is
in
this
agreement
is
going
to
be
permanent,
and
so
what
that
means
is
all
the
infrastructure
is
provided
up
front
I'll
show
a
slide
here
in
a
minute.
E
What
that
looks
like,
but
the
county
is
going
to
pay
it
back
over
50-year
period
of
time.
It's
not
going
to
have
any
interest
associated
with
it.
So
that's
pretty
good
and
I'll
talk
about
that
in
a
second
and
it's
going
to
be
a
build
to
suit
environment.
So
as
technology
changes
as
companies
changes
as
things
change
over
time
that
this
development
agreement
allows
for
that
to
occur,
and
we
have
only
changed
the
development
agreement
several
times.
That
was
an
agreement
between
story,
county
and
the
developer.
E
One
cannot
change
without
the
other
one
and
it
was
not
to
create
more
restrictions
over
time.
It
was
because
new
companies
had
come
in
new
things.
We
never
thought
of,
like
data
centers
didn't
exist
in
1999
and
to
clarify
and
to
provide
more
entitlement
for
these
uses
to
come
that
exist
today.
The
next
thing
on
that
column
is
1999.
Zoning
is
frozen
as
well
as
the
1999
fees
in
story
county.
The
fees
for
special
use
permits
variances.
All
these
sorts
of
things
were
still
under
the
1999
numbers.
E
You
can
get
a
permit
in
this
county
for
100
bucks.
You
can
get
a
major
special
use
permit
for
the
highest
heaviest
level
of
industrial
development.
You
can
possibly
imagine
on
the
face
of
earth
for
2500
bucks,
and
that
is
frozen
in
time
for
50
years.
That
cannot
change
without
agreement
between
both
of
the
parties
and
right
now,
neither
of
the
parties
are
asking
to
change
it,
because
it's
through
volume,
it's
like
walmart.
How
do
they
make
money?
How
does
amazon
make
money?
It's
through
volume?
E
We
don't
need
the
permit
fee,
we
bring
in
a
company,
we
have
a
competitive
advantage.
We
bring
in
property
tax
and
that
pays
for
whatever
it
took
us
to
bring
that
company
in
and
then
the
development
agreement
knew
about
water.
It
obviously
needs
to
be
managed
through
a
general
improvement
district
and
sewer,
but
one
of
the
things
I'm
proud
of
that
will
be
talked
about.
The
next
meeting
is
a
conservation
program
where
that
water
out
there
is
used
six
times
before
it,
either
evaporates
or
something
happens
to
it.
E
But
it's
used
again
and
again
and
again
that
folks,
like
sherry
whalen,
are
experts
at
we'll
talk
about
later,
I'm
going
to
go
to
slide
number
18.,
and
this
has
a
couple
important
images
on
it
and
the
one
on
the
middle
here.
These
are
all
of
the
roads.
All
of
this
spaghetti
are
the
roads
that
story
county
not
only
has
a
tri-center,
but
that
we
owe
money
on
there's
about
a
hundred
lane
miles
of
highway
out
there.
E
Four
lane
built
to
standards,
no,
not
all
four
lane
but
they're
all
built
to
county
standards
and
roger
norman,
built
those
roads
up
front
with
his
money.
And
then
we
pay
him
back
over
time.
There's
48
million
dollars
that
story
county
owes
back
to
roger
norman.
It's
in
the
30s
today,
because
we
have
been
making
payments
and
story
county
was
given
an
assurance.
They
said
roger
norman,
said
how
about
this.
E
I
won't
even
ask
for
the
first
payment
until
you
guys
make
about
5
million
bucks
and
we
so
we
could
get
ourselves
caught
up
to
be
able
to
catch
up
with
this
and
be
able
to
make
payments.
So
he
worked
with
us.
It
was
a
mutual
agreement
and
then
you
can
see
in
all
the
different
components
here.
Usa,
parkway
today
the
nevada
department
of
transportation
owns
that
road,
but
story
county
still
owes
the
money
on
that
road.
We
are
still
in
debt
to
that
interstate
80
interchange.
E
That
is
what
the
usa
parkway
interchange
looks
like
from
ariel.
It's
not
just
a
diamond
interchange.
It
had
to
go
over
the
river,
the
railroad
interstate
80
through
other
types
of
land.
It
was
pretty
complex
and
then
we
got
fire
stations.
We
got
our
existing
fire
and
county
offices,
all
that
roger
norman
paid
up
front,
and
then
we
pay
them
back
over
time
and
part
of
those
payments.
I
said:
they're
interest-free
and
they're
50-year
agreements
they're,
not
debt.
E
We
were
able
to
make
that
in
such
a
way
that
it
didn't
create
debt
or
cause
any
harm
to
the
county's
ability
to
bond
what
that
is.
It
means
as
we
pay
it
back
over
time,
but
it
doesn't
show
up
as
debt
because
it
is
not
debt.
It
is
paid
through
by
development
and
and
taxes
that
come
in
from
the
companies
we
create
out
there
and
then
so
you
know
how
that
works
is
80.
E
We
believe
it's
hard
to
tell
the
department
of
taxation
about
80
percent
of
the
sales
tax
and
sales
and
use
tax
that
comes
into
the
counties
attributed
to
tri-center.
That
is
what
tri-center
is
subject
to
for
payment
and
then
roger
gets
35
cents
on
the
dollar.
For
all
of
that
repayment,
I'm
going
to
go
to
page
19
now,
and
it
looks
like
this.
E
E
We
have
150
space
rv
park.
Coming
has
the
same
purpose:
it's
extended
stay.
We
have
a
90
room,
approximately
marriott
under
construction
right
now,
that's
exactly
the
same.
It's
extended
stay,
there's
a
potential
hilton
and
there's
also
another
use
that
would
provide
60
to
100
spaces
with
a
daycare
and
other
types
of
uses
that
would
support
folks
living
out
there
at
an
extended
period
of
time,
not
as
permanent
residents.
E
I'm
not
going
to
spend
a
whole
long
time
talking
about
this,
but
later
I'll
talk
about
painted
rock
there's
a
perception
that
story
county
does
not
like
residential,
because
we
don't
want
residential
at
the
industrial
center.
The
development
agreement
doesn't
allow
industrial
within
the
annex,
portions
and
there's
reasons
for
that.
It's
not
a
place
to
live,
it's
a
place
of
intense
industry,
but
we
are
not
against
residential.
As
we'll
talk
about
in
a
bit,
I'm
going
to
go
to
page
20.
E
20
looks
like
this:
I'm
not
going
to
spend
a
whole
lot
of
time
on
this
page,
because
it's
pretty
simple.
This
is
how
we
bring
companies
in
this
is
our
entire
bureaucracy
right
here
companies
come
to
us,
they
come
to
me
or
they'll,
come
to
a
department
head
or
they'll,
come
to
a
commissioner
and
they'll
say
we
want
to
build
in
story
county
and
we
all
work
as
a
team
to
bring
them
in.
We
guarantee
a
five-day
permit
for
grading
in
30
days
for
building,
and
we
provide
24
7
accessibility.
E
To
give
you
an
example,
what
that
looks
like
in
order
to
bring
a
semiconductor
company
into
story
county,
our
community
development
director,
and
I
flew
to
taiwan
on
a
saturday
and
came
back
the
very
next
day
to
look
at
a
very
specialized
process
that
they
had
that
we
were
concerned
about
to
make
sure
we
could
respond
to.
We
found
out
that
we
could.
We
brought
that
company
in
and
they're
out
there
operating
now,
I'm
gonna
go
to
page
21..
E
This
is
one
of
my
favorite
slides,
it's
pretty
simple,
but
we
believe
this
had
something
to
do
with
tesla
coming
to
northern
nevada.
There
was
a
lot
of
talk
about
how
northern
nevada
can
do
things
that
arizona,
california
and
texas
could
not,
and
there
was
a
question
about
really
everybody's
saying
they
can
do
everything.
Can
you
really
do
it?
This
building
dean,
haymore
our
building
director
and
I
went
and
took
we
took
their
engineers
over
to
take
a
look
and
and
they're
on
one
end
of
the
building.
E
Looking
at
this
finished
concrete
being
done
and
they're
putting
in
the
interior
improvements
into
the
building
like
yeah,
that's
really
nice!
On
the
other
side
of
the
building,
where
you
see
right
now,
they
were
blasting
the
side
of
the
mountain.
At
the
same
time,
they
were
doing
finish,
work
at
the
other
end
of
the
building,
and
that
was
one
of
the
things
the
engineer
said:
that's
proof
in
the
pudding
right
there,
if
you
blast
the
side
of
a
mountain
and
build
on
the
other
one.
E
At
the
same
concurrent
time,
we
know
you
can
bring
our
company
in
I'm
going
to
go
to
page
22.,
and
this
one
is
real
simple.
It's
just
a
list
of
innovative
companies
that
we've
brought
in
to
story
county.
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
all
the
lists
very
long,
but
these
are
most
of
the
innovative
companies
and,
as
commissioner
mitchell
said,
today
was
the
second
day
that
nanotech
has
come
into
story
county
to
create
a
campus
for
high-tech
uses.
I'm
going
to
go
to
page
23.
That
looks
like
this.
E
E
You
can
see
that
story,
county
jobs
that
we're
bringing
to
the
region
are
high,
paying
jobs
in
their
high
tech,
jobs
and
the
second
column
you
can
see
through
management
that
we're
bringing
in
management,
tech,
math
engineering
and
those
types
of
jobs
at
a
very
high
rate,
and
the
next
slide
24
looks
like
this
and
it's
real
simple.
It
just
shows
story,
county's
growth
of
jobs
compared
to
the
state.
It
shows
that
we
are
an
attractor
of
jobs.
E
Now
I'm
going
to
go
the
next
slide
25.-
and
this
is
a
quote.
This
came
right
out
of
the
governor's
office
of
economic
development
in
2018..
It
says
the
operations
of
the
gigafactory
have
created
significant
economic
benefits
for
washoe
and
story
county.
The
gigafactory
has
not
only
created
close
to
7600
jaw
or
7060
new
jobs,
but
there's
also
generated
significant
regional
economic
growth
based
on
primary
and
secondary
demand
for
local
vendors
and
employee
spending.
E
This
is
going
to
be
a
segue
to
the
next
slide
and
that
next
slide
looks
like
this,
and
it's
really
the
direct
output
and
the
multiplier
output.
That's
happening
only
at
the
gigafactory
alone.
Instead
of
coming
up
with
our
own
numbers
or
our
consultants,
which
we
could
do,
we
thought
it
might
be
best
just
to
show
what
goet
has
already
ported
in
2018
for
their
their
gigafactory
report
and
in
the
first
column
it
shows
that
there's
seven
thousand
employees
brought
into
the
gigafactory
as
permanent
factory
type
of
work.
E
Employees
that
has
resulted
in
379
million
dollars
and
payroll
has
resulted
in
2.2
billion
dollars
annually
and
total
output
and
over
20-year
period
is
101
billion
dollars.
But
this
is
not
to
story
county.
Most
of
this
is
actually
occurring
in
reno
sparks
in
washoe
as
people
where
they
live.
That's
where
they
go
to
the
movies
they
buy
their
groceries,
they
buy
their
fords
and
chevys.
They
do
all
of
their
commercial
purchases.
Those
things
are
happening
there.
E
E
This
is,
if
you
take
the
jobs
and
then
you
take
the
husbands
and
wives
and
aunts
and
kids,
and
then
you
take
all
the
people
that
had
to
come
to
the
region
to
service
them,
the
people
that
are
at
the
grocery
stores
or
whatever
car
dealers,
whatever
you
want
to
name
it
15
000
people
associated
with
that
and
840
million
annual
test
total
payroll
and
total
output
3.5
billion
dollars.
Again,
these
are
reports
right
out
of
goed
for
2018.
E
They
don't
account
for
the
actual
number
of
employees
associated
with
the
gigafactory,
but
those
that
were
at
the
base
level
and
we're
just
going
to
leave
it
at
the
base
level.
For
this
conversation,
the
next
slide
looks
like
this,
and
this
one
here
is
just
regional
tax
money
that
has
come
in
again
from
the
goed
report:
2018,
it's
the
region,
the
the
washoe
municipal
service
area,
which
does
include
a
story
of
course
reno
sparks
washoe
and
story,
29
million
dollars
annually
and
then
indirect
tax
revenues
to
the
state,
12
million
dollars.
E
58
million
total,
if
you
include
other
things
that
are
not
necessarily
listed
in
that,
and
the
most
important
thing
is
generated
at
the
full
unabated
rate.
The
idea
is
that
on
or
that
abated
sales,
tax
dollar
ends
up
an
employee's
pocket
and
turns
into
an
unabated
sales
tax
dollar.
When
that
item
is
bought
in
our
region.
E
Next
time
I
go
to
page
14.
Actually,
it's
slide.
28.
looks
like
this
and
it's
pretty
simple,
but
I,
like
the
graphic,
that's
on
the
right
or
your
your
left.
What's
important
about
this
slide
is
the
careers
that
we
brought.
We
have
17
000
people
we
brought
to
the
region
with
jobs,
there's
250
approximately
thousand
jobs
in
the
region
and
the
businesses
that
we
have
brought
since
the
1980s
are
businesses
that
washoe
county
sent
our
way.
E
They
include
the
regional
lockwood
landfill
one
of
the
largest
in
the
world,
or
at
least
in
the
country,
lithium
manufacturing
power
plants,
weapons
manufacturing,
diesel
manufacturing.
These
were
companies
that
were
brought
to
us.
Reno
didn't
want
them
sparks,
didn't
want
them,
washoe
didn't
want
them,
they
weren't
quite
compatible
with
what
they
got
going
on
over
there.
E
So
we
took
them
in
and
then
now
we're
bringing
in
high-tech
businesses,
such
as
the
data
centers
and
the
the
tech
in
the
r
d
and
the
research
and
development
and
those
sorts
of
things,
and
my
kind
of
what
I
like
to
say
here
is
this
meeting,
as
we
have
right
now
is
brought
to
you
by
the
electricity
that
is
provided
by
the
800
megawatt
power
plant
located
in
story
county.
E
So
you
can
see
that
that
power
plant
is
working
quite
well,
as
our
meeting
has
been
working
quite
well
and
then
the
picture
that's
on
the
right
here
you
see
a
picture
of
old
reno
and
I'm
from
here,
and
I
love
old
reno,
but
we
certainly
have
grown
grown
a
long
way
and
then
you
see
an
industrial
building
at
the
bottom.
What
the
point
of
that
slide
is
is
when
I
went
to
school,
you
either
went
to
unr
or
you
went
into
construction
or
you
went
into
the
casino
industry
or
you
left
the
state.
E
That
was
pretty
much
the
extent
of
the
career
opportunities
for
my
generation
growing
up
in
nevada
and
what
has
happened
now-
and
this
is
all
of
us-
it
isn't
just
us
we're
all
part
of
this.
Is
we
have
diversified
northern
nevada's
economy
to
where
now
you
can
actually
raise
your
kids
here
and
they
can
grow
up
and
go
into
tech
industries.
They
can
go
into
different
types
of.
You
know,
skilled
craftsmanship
type
of
work.
E
E
E
These
are
things
that
have
taken
many
many
years
to
put
together
to
show
regionally
how
we
work
with
all
of
our
partners
and
to
highlight
some
of
the
fire
and
ems
agreements
is
just
within
the
area
in
which
the
blockchain
in
the
innovation
zone.
We
currently
have
six
agreements
with
the
neighbors
who
who
do
respond
out
there
and
assist
us
and
as
well,
we
assist
them
all
of
these
agreements
again
have
just
taken
a
lot
of
time
and
work,
and
it's
us
working
as
a
united
front.
E
So
I
did
mention
earlier
in
my
testimony
that
little
story
county
can't
handle
a
lot
of
the
bigger
incidents,
nor
can
lyon
county
and
the
two
districts
or
three
districts
that
are
within
lyon,
county
or
our
neighbors.
So
we
rely
on
each
other
a
lot
and
that's
why
we
do
things
similar.
We
put
into
place
these
agreements
that
either
a
will
will
show
up
if
you
call
for
us
or
like
what
we
have
with
washoe
county
and
truckee
meadows
fire
protection
district.
E
Is
we
have
an
automatic
aid
agreement
so
knowing
that
their
fire
stations
are
quite
quite
a
drive
from
an
incident
that
may
happen
on
the
I-80
corridor?
We
just
take
that
call
for
them.
We
do
that
without
charge
and
under
an
agreement
as
being
a
good
neighbor
and
a
partner
within
northwestern
nevada.
E
It
goes
far
deeper
and
a
lot
of
these
you
know
I
can't
give
you
specifics
on.
But
again
I
just
want
to
reiterate
the
work
that
story
county
has
put
together
over
years
and
to
keep
up
with
the
growth
and
the
development
of
tri
and
as
well
as
our
neighbors
and
how
we
work
together
just
to
solve
the
problem
at
this
time,
I'll
get
back
to
county
manager,
austin
oswald.
E
Thank
you.
Fire
chief
loan
car
appreciate
that
and
a
couple
other
items
on
this
slide
that
we're
regionally
cooperating
with
working
with
all
kinds
of
folks
in
carson
city
and
washoe,
reno
sparks
and
lyon.
County
is
flood
mitigation
in
our
communities.
I'll
talk
about
the
affluent
pipeline.
In
a
moment,
youth
services,
water
services,
indigent
care
health
coalition
with
the
quad
counties,
coveted
response,
for
example,
lands
bills.
We
are
supporting
the
washoe
county
lands
bills
for
economic
development
sparks
wants
to
do
north
of
us.
That's
not
in
competition
with
us.
E
E
Now
I'm
going
to
talk
about
this
slide,
this
is
page
30
or
slide
30.,
and
this
is
an
affluent
pipeline
project.
That
was
a
situation.
So
the
title
of
the
slide
I'll
talk
about
here
in
a
minute
says
the
regional
cooperation
washoe
county's
hundred
million
dollar
fluent
problem
became
a
regional
economic
generator.
It
really
is
the
truth.
Reno
sparks
washoe,
their
sewer
treatment
plant
was
not
complying
with
epa
standards
and
putting
nitrates
into
the
truckee
river.
I'm
not
putting
reno
sparks
washoe
down
for
this.
E
E
What
if
we
brought
that
affluent
water
over
to
tri-center
connected
it
into
the
general
improvement
district
out
there
and
used
it
to
create
jobs,
used
it
for
industry
and
non-potable
industrial
water
kinds
of
things
and
in
turn,
then
of
course,
tri-center
won't
need
to
use
potable
water
for
industry
and
the
idea
working
with
all
three
of
those
entities.
Next
door
and
the
county
commissioners
of
story
county
and
the
general
improvement
district
out
of
try.
We're
able
to
come
up
with
a
very
complex
way
to
address
this.
E
The
water
is
brought
over
to
industrial
uses,
the
companies
that
are
benefiting
from
that
put
the
money
up
front
to
build
the
facility,
the
fluent
pipeline,
and
then
what
happens
at
that
point.
It
brings
economic
development
to
story
county,
which
is
tax
dollars,
of
course,
and
a
portion
of
those
new
tax
dollars
then
are
returned
into
reimbursing
to
those
companies
for
the
affluent
pipeline.
E
E
What's
important
about
this
too,
is
then
tahoe
reno
industrial
center
donated
or
gave
water
upstream
that
it
had
owned,
which
is
clean
water
and
then
reno
sparks
washa
through
a
complicated
agreement
with
ndot
can
put
that
water
back
into
the
truckee
river
to
meet
the
troller
requirements
for
water
being
exited
and
entering
back
into
the
river
it's
much
more
complex
than
that,
but
it
kind
of
gives
you
an
idea
for
regional
cooperation,
how
we
can
get
things
done
and
all
the
things
that
are
being
presented
today
through
innovations
or
our
development
can
be
done
through
this
kind
of
thinking,
I'm
going
to
turn
to
page
slide
or
31,
and
I'm
going
to
give
us
a
brief
discussion
about
residential
background,
and
this
is
really
where
we're
going
to
tie
into
the
innovation
zones
as
well
as
the
need
for
residences
in
northern
nevada.
E
So
the
first
map
here
this
is
a
simple
map.
This
is
just
the
story.
County
master
plan
areas
and
all
those
areas
have
different
goals
and,
and
all
that
and
seven
of
these
areas
allow
for
residential
and
four
of
them
allow
for
major
residential
like
a
planned
unit.
Development.
Major
subdivision
type
of
thing,
four
of
them
allow
for
mixed-use
residential.
This
would
be
like
what
you
see
in
midtown
in
reno,
or
even
like
the
blockchain's
proposal
for
very
mixed
use,
and
then
seven
of
them
allow
for
commercial
industrial.
E
The
next
slide
here
is
on
slide
33,
and
this
shows
inside
our
zoning
map.
The
areas
in
the
county
that
are
really
set
up
for
residential
and,
like
I
said
earlier,
you
can
see
virginia
city
is
about
1200
parcels.
The
highlands
is
really
a
very
rural
horse
type
of
property.
We're
never
going
to
propose
for
that
to
be
anything,
really
innovative,
it's
going
to
be
what
it
is.
Lockwood
is
a
thousand
people
now
it
is
set
up
for
potential
mixed
uses
and
those
sorts
of
residential
development.
E
Now
I'm
going
to
go
to
page
34.,
and
this
gives
you
an
idea
for
those
folks
that
aren't
from
here
where
painted
rock
is
in
relation
to
reno
sparks
and
fernley,
and
the
industrial
center,
and
there's
the
tesla
gigafactory
right
there
and
there's
a
potential
road
that
would
connect
painted
rock
into
the
industrial
center.
Ideally,
we
would
love
to
see
that
happen
and
not
have
any
dependence
on
interstate
80,
but
in
reality
there
probably
some
dependents
on
interstate
80
regardless.
But
that
gives
you
a
little
bit
of
an
orientation
of
where
things
are
in
the.
E
This
is
from
our
master
plan,
this
image,
that's
on
the
right
or
on
your
left.
So
this.
Actually
it's
not
our
image.
It
came
from
great
places
out
of
the
american
planning
association
and
that
was
put
into
our
master
plan
for
a
reason
that
was
to
describe
what
we
would
like
to
see
happen
out
of
painted
rock.
We
wanted
to
make
a
point
that
this
is
not
a
community
for
suburban
residential
development.
It's
not
a
place.
We
want
to
see
horse
properties
and
and
corral
fences
and
those
sorts
of
things.
E
We
wanted
to
see
a
mixed
use,
urban
kind
of
a
high
density
place
where
people
live,
they
work
they
play.
They
live
on
top
of
their
job,
those
sorts
of
things,
and
then
these
are
the
things
here
that
the
master
plan
has
and
its
goals
about
discouraging
urban
sprawl.
Creating
what
really
blockchains
is
presented
as
a
very
high,
dense
core
of
you
know
place
you
could
live
work
and
play
and
never
leave
we're.
Okay
with
that
and
it's
mixed
uses,
and
then
these
are
the
types
of
things
that
facilitate
rail.
They
facilitate.
E
You
know
multimodal
transit
and
all
these
modern
types
of
development
technique
this
slide
here.
This
is
blockchain's
their
smart
city.
This
came
right
out
of
their
website.
They
presented
it
before
and
the
point
of
this
is
it
fits
with
the
story
county
master
plan.
This
is
our
vision
for
painted
rock.
We
would
love
to
see
something
happen
like
this
in
our
community
through
the
proper,
normal
planning
meetings,
and
we
believe
that
that
can
happen
through
proper
normal
planning
means.
E
Thank
you
very
much
austin
and
madam
chair
for
the
record
todd
hess
superintendent
story,
county
school
district.
As
I
stated
a
little
bit
ago,
we
did
have
direct
involvement
with
the
master
plan.
I
think
it
took
austin
about
seven
years
to
develop
that
we
put
it
in
front
of
our
community
quite
a
few
times
in
regards
to
the
school
district
goals.
Side
of
thing,
one
of
the
things
that
we
really
emphasized
in
there
was
the
need
for
this
to
be
a
a
true
community
center.
E
So
not
only
do
we
have
you
know
all
of
our
k-12
programs
that
we
want
that
we
would
run
through
the
nevada
department
of
education
following
all
those
standards,
but
also
some
post-secondary
things.
We
do
a
lot
with
with
colleges,
including
truckee
meadows,
community
college.
E
I
just
talked
to
former
governor
sandoval
now,
president
of
the
university
of
nevada,
reno
about
beginning
a
dual
enrollment
program
here
in
story
county,
and
we
currently
have
a
really
strong
agreement
with
western
nevada
college
and
president
vincent
solis.
So
we
have
that
we
also
look
very
strongly
at
some
vocational
and
stem
programs
also
partnerships
within
the
park,
for
example.
E
You
know
health
and
life
insurance,
etc,
and
then
the
possibility
looking
at
bringing
in
charter
or
regional
magnet
school,
I
think,
would
be
intriguing
as
we
look
at
some
of
the
opportunities
within
the
park
and
again
make
that
hub
part
of
the
community
center
on
that
so
appreciate
the
input
it
was
approved
by
our
board,
and
then
I
believe
that
june
was
approved
by
the
story
county
commissioners
I'll
turn
it
back
to
austin.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you,
superintendent,
hess
and
thank
you,
madam
chair,
may
I
continue
yes,
we're
coming
close
to
the
end
all
right!
Thank
you.
So
I'm
going
to
turn
to
slide
number
38..
It
looks
like
this,
and
this
is
the
actual
master
plan
map
that
we
have
for
painted
rock
and
what's
important
in
that
it's
a
transition
area.
So
in
2006
this
project
had
come
to
story
county
and
wanted
to
get
a
plane
unit
development
mixed
use
out
there
and
they
got
approved.
E
They
were
approved
by
the
planning
commission
and
they
were
approved
by
the
county
commission
unanimously,
so
our
master
plan
in
2016.
I
wanted
to
reflect
on
that
2006
approval.
The
reason
2006
approval
didn't
happen
is
because,
as
we're
all
aware,
in
2008
9
and
10,
we
went
into
economic
situation
that
made
the
project
unbiable
at
the
time.
E
So
the
project
was
approved
in
o6.
It
reverted
back
to
the
prior
zoning,
but
then
the
master
plan
was
written
to
support
that
project
with
no
master
plan
map
needed,
but
no
master
plan
text.
Amendment
needed
they'd
have
to
do
a
zone
change
which
is
a
procedural
element,
because
the
master
plan
says
that
the
zone
change
to
plan
unit
development
must
occur
if
the
application
is
complete.
The
area
is
roughly
2100
acres.
E
The
next
slide
here
this
is
slide.
39
looks
like
this,
so
this
slide
actually
comes
out
of
jeremy
aguero's
presentation
from
the
first
meeting
and
he
shows
a
75-year
build
period
for
the
project
and
what
they
want
to
do,
and
there
weren't
any
numbers
or
data
necessarily
associated
with
that.
But
the
image
is
good
enough
to
kind
of
get
a
ballpark
of
what
might
occur
and
using
best
planning
planning
principles,
and
you
know
whether
it's
financial
or
land
use
planning.
E
We
use
a
20-year
period
of
time
and
then
just
focus
on
that.
So
the
next
slide
is
on
page
40..
E
On
40.-
and
this
slide
here
builds
off
of
mr
aguero's
projections,
and
it
shows
what
would
happen
in
story
county
if
it
approved
painted
rock
planned
unit,
development
or
subdivision
based
on
what
he
had
provided.
You
can
see
right
now.
We
have
roughly
4
300
folks
and
then
over
a
20-year
period
would
go
up
to
11
000..
This
number
here
is
consistent
with
his
numbers.
It's
also
consistent
roughly
with
the
2006
approval.
The
county
commissioners
was
willing
to
take
on
at
that
time
to
help
facilitate
development
of
this
project.
E
Is
that
no
master
plan
is
needed
for
texting
or
for
text
or
for
map,
and
we
really
recommend
just
simply
submit
an
application.
We
provided
an
outline
for
that
to
the
proponents
of
this
project
and
we've
also
provided
the
applications
and
materials
needed
and
then
for
the
last
slide.
Madam
chair,
if
you
were
okay
with
it,
I
would
ask
that
I
pass
over
to
commissioner
mitchell
for
a
closing
statement
on
this
presentation.
E
So
I
just
first
of
all,
I
want
to
apologize
that
we
took
so
much
of
your
time,
but
really
felt
like
it
was
important
to
allow
you
to
hear
from
a
broad
range
of
folks
that
deal
with
this
stuff
and
their
different
areas
of
expertise
on
a
day-to-day
basis,
and
so
just
to
summarize-
and
this
is
this
is
on
slide
number
43,
and
this
will
be
my
closing
remarks.
The
innovation
zone-
governance
as
proposed
is
not
really
comparable
to
disney
world
the
ready,
creek
improvement,
district
or
songdo
south
korea.
E
E
The
economic
activity
that
happens
in
our
county
directly
and
indirectly
benefits
northern
nevada,
and
we
just
don't
feel
that
the
reasons
given
for
the
separatist
governance
piece
and
then
in
the
innovation
zone,
legislation
they're,
founded
in
a
way
that
is
compelling
enough
to
make
it
worth
going
through
all
the
rigmarole
to
do
that.
The
last
slide
summarize
excuse
me.
Number
44
summarizes
some
recommendations
that
we
would
make
to
this
committee.
E
The
first
one
is
to
to
really
examine
in
detail
the
agreement
that
that
we
have
in
place
with
john
the
towering
industrial
center.
That
development
agreement
is
a
successful
example
of
a
public-private
partnership.
It's
used
in
stimulating
growth
and
preventing
government
interference,
but
also
encourage
the
committee
to
direct
the
proponents
to
submit
an
application,
and
what
that
does
is
it
would
allow
us
to
help
vet
out
the
issues
and
work
through
them,
and
then
we
could
come
back
if
there's
something
that
can't
be
worked
out
with
us.
E
The
third
recommendation
that
we
have
is
to
apply
some
of
the
creative
practices
and
innovative
things
that
we've
done
here
in
story
county
to
other
parts
of
the
state
and
to
look
at
what
can
we
do?
Maybe
better
we're
not
we're
not
the
end
all
be
all,
but
maybe
we
take
that
and
build
off
of
it
and
find
ways
to
make
sure
that
the
same
diversification
and
economic
development
that
we've
seen
happens
elsewhere,
maybe
in
a
way
that
better
addresses
regional
impacts
and
the
last
ones
now
listed
on
this
slide.
E
But
it's
kind
of
a
personal
interest
of
mine
is,
I
feel
it's
important
to
delve
into
the
feasibility
of
the
contingent
tax
proposal,
the
stable
coin,
taxation
or
the
the
blockchain's
taxation
piece
and
the
reason
that
we
need
to
delve
into
that
is
because,
while
it's
not
in
this
proposed
legislation,
this
legislation
is
contingent
on
it
and-
and
I
don't
believe
that
it's
feasible
to
tax
blockchain's
transactions,
I'm
not
aware
of
anywhere
in
the
in
the
blockchain's
universe
that
that's
being
done,
and
that
may
just
be
my
insufficiency.
E
But
I
I
think
it's
problematic,
because
it
goes
against
the
ethos
of
a
distributed
ledger
and
so
not
necessarily
discussion
for
this
time,
but
certainly
something
that
I
would
welcome
further
discussion
on
because
I
think
it's
worth
delving
into,
because
that's
one
of
the
main
upsides
or
positives
to
the
proposal
and
with
that.
That
concludes
our
presentation.
Thank
you
very
much.
E
Thank
you
so
much
for
that
presentation
night.
My
goal
is
to
be
done
in
time
to
get
you
all
so
that
you
can
attend
your
county
commission
meeting.
Are
there
questions
from
the
members
on
the
presentation.
E
Okay,
I
have
I
have
just
a
a
couple
then,
if
I'm
looking
at
page,
I'm
looking
at
two
slides-
and
I
guess
they're
just
more
observation,
so
I
guess
I
won't
call
them
questions
at
this
point,
but
just
things
that
that
I'm
holding
in
my
in
my
mind
at
this
time,
I'm
looking,
I
want
to
look
at
slide
number
26.
E
On
number
26
and
then
27,
and
so
I
appreciate
you
highlighting
the
regional
economic
outputs,
the
one
specific
to
to
the
the
tesla
gigafactory
out
there.
I
think
that's
slide,
26,
that's
specific
to
that,
and
then
the
tax
generation
to
washoe
and
story
county
and
and
once
again,
in
here
kind
of
looking
at
the
revenues
coming
in
spending
in
other
outputs.
And
then
I
think
these
are
and
my
tax
staff
might
remember.
E
E
If
this
is
based
on
that
the
actual
numbers
or
if
this
was
based
on
the
projections
that
we
thought
we
would
get
2018
on
those
impacts.
E
So
I'm
I'm
I'm
thinking
of
that,
and
then
I'm
I'm
also
thinking
about
how
this
plays
out
in
terms
of
other
impacts
that
we'll
talk
about
down
the
road,
one
of
them
being
not
and
not
specific
to
this
one
company
but
kind
of
specific
to
other
companies
that
might
be
in
the
tri
area
and
in
an
aggregate
for
those
who
don't
aren't
able
to
provide
health
insurance
to
their
employees.
And
so
the
state
picks
up
the
tab
on
the
health
insurance.
Because
we
you
know,
we
have
that
document
that
can
really.
E
We've
got
a
report
that
really
well
documents
the
actual
cost
to
the
state
and
what
that
is
of
the
you
know:
cost
estate
in
terms
of
medicaid
independence
coming
from
certain
areas.
So
I'm
just
holding
that
in
my
head,
I'm
also
holding
in
my
head
as
I
look
at
slide.
E
40
with
the
residential
growth
build
out-
and
I
think
this
is
one
of
the
questions
for
me-
is
whether
you
have
an
innovation
zone
or
not
just
thinking
and
being
cognizant
about
story,
county's
plan
for
residential
over
the
years,
because
I
see
that
within
2025,
you
want
to
add
about
200
more
residents
and
then
you
start
adding
a
couple
more
residents,
but
we
know
right
now
that
there's
you
know
we're
really
lopsided
between
the
number
of
residents
who
work
in
story
county
versus
the
number
of
residents
who
live
there,
meaning
that
the
number
of
residents
who
are
there's
employees
are
commuting
to
another
county
to
live
commuting
to
counties
that
have
to
you
know,
have
had
to
build
additional
schools,
and
so
there's
always
that
that
benefit
which
is
good
and
the
region
has
transformed,
which
was
good.
E
That
was
an
absolute
intended
goal.
I
think
for
a
lot
of
folks
and
you
folks
have
had
a
wonderful
hand
in
it.
I
just
think
that
other
that
other
piece
is
talking
about.
Okay,
you
know
always
with
growth,
comes
the
questions
that
we're
having
now,
which
is
okay.
Well,
what
do
we
do
about?
The
impacts
around
it.
E
What
do
we
do
around
housing
and
is
an
additional
200
housing
units
in
the
next
three
years
really
going
to
be
helpful
and
meaningful,
then,
and
that's
regardless
of
whether
we
have
you
know
people
move
out
to
painted
rock
regardless
if
it's
in
an
innovation
zone
or
not
right,
I
you
know
those
were
just
a
couple
of
questions,
things
that
I
was
holding
in
my
head
during
this
conversation
and
thank
you
so
much
mr
osborne,
because
this
is
really
detailed,
and
I
appreciate
I
appreciate
the
conversation
and
all
the
information
that
you've
provided
to
committee
members
just
want
to
check
in
on
questions
one
last
time
from
committee
members.
E
E
Have
your
county
commission
meeting
and
we'll
move
into
item
six,
which
is
public
comment
and
broadcasting
I'll
hand
it
back
over
to
you
and
before
you
do
before
we
do
that
I'll
remind
folks
that
they
want
to
call
in
the
number
six
six,
nine
nine
hundred
sixty
eight
thirty
three,
and
that
the
meeting
id
for
this
meeting
is
eight
eight
one,
nine
seven
one
three
six,
seven
one
three
and
then
you
press
the
pound
sign.
E
If
you
have
any
issues
calling
in,
please
call
684-6990,
so
our
staff
can
give
assistance
to
you
with
that.
We'll
move
to
public.
E
Thank
you,
chef,
anita
thompson.
If
you
would
like
to
offer
a
public
comment
on
today's
meeting,
please
press
star
nine
now
to
take
your
place
in
the
queue
once
more.
We
are
on
public
comment
for
today's
meeting.
If
you
would
like
to
speak,
please
press
star
night
now
to
take
your
place
in
the
queue.
E
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair,
for
the
record,
my
name
is
danny
thompson,
d-a-n-n-y
t-h-o-m-p,
I'm
representing
the
operating
engineers,
local
3
and
local
12..
In
the
interest
of
time.
I
won't
leave
a
lot
of
remarks
just
to
say
that
we
view
this
bdr
and
the
innovation
zones
as
the
single
largest
producer
opportunity,
produced
jobs
in
the
history
of
nevada
and
we're
all
in
favor
of
it.
Thank
you.
E
E
Thank
you
so
much
members
for
your
time,
commitment
today
to
be
present
with
us.
Thank
you
so
much
all
presenters
for
the
information
conversation
that
you
brought
for
today.
We
appreciate
it
we'll
be
polling
members
on
availability
of
the
next
meeting
in
october.
E
At
that
time,
we'll
also
be
taking
we'll
be
reaching
out
to
folks
about
the
next
topic,
as
well
as
we
start
to
dive
into
more
specific
impact
issues
going
forward
and
that
with
that
being
all
I
will
call
and
end
to
this
meeting.
We
are
adjourned.