NixOS NixOS Release Team, 10 Apr 2020

Previous Meeting

Next Meeting

⏯

youtube image

►

From YouTube: NixOS 20.03 Markhor Go / No-Go #3

Description

Blocker review meeting.

A

And just in time, I've just clicked girl bye from the YouTube thing great.

B

I think do we have everyone here.

B

Perhaps Samuel is fellow jettster, maybe not not sure if he just changed his display name last time.

A

I'm just going to share a link to the live stream in a few places.

B

I kind of know get my zoom has a participants window.

A

All right, I think we're ready when you are okay.

B

I just giving Samuel a minute, if not I, guess we can just begin without him.

B

uh He'll get hurt when he gets there. Okay, gonna begin showing my stream, okay, hello. Everyone welcome. This is Phoenix West 2003 go/no-go meeting and this particular meeting. We just evaluate severe blockers that we have labels on github that would um possibly a blocker for the police and track them. You know disseminate information around that and see if it's finished and then eventually make the final decision.

B

If it's ready to go so I have like the UM information here, I just sort of look at these two links: blocker box and the block of PRS, and if you want to see a note, some last meeting, we were in the UM main thread, the things we talked about and I'm pretty sure everything that we decided to work on from the last meeting has been completed.

B

Aside from the Nexus xx, three highlights and if we look here at the milestone with the severe bugs, that is actually the only thing that's like not done and I actually um sent Florian. My draft for the UM highlights I think today and he's just working on translating with them.

B

So that's pretty much I think I was pretty much not anything to do. Besides one bug that actually caught my eye, the has to do with Haskell and I, wasn't completely sure a little Baccarin, because I'm not familiar at all the house, kill and I really do hope. Someone is in this call.

B

Let me see: I did see that Frederick labeled, it is in the milestone for 2003 and that needed changelog.

B

It says Haskell, derivations, behavior and in regards that bill depends changed in 2003 projects, relying on the old behavior will break and there's a number a scalar projects. I work on use that function to make tests pensee to build tools in the barbed I'm, gonna vote kinnexa. And then it's saying it's undocumented change and it's changed and how it's been in 1990 to 2003.

B

Yeah I'm not sure what do exactly about this bug. You have any opinions here.

A

If nobody else speaks up, my opinion would be. It hasn't received attention for nine days. Let's, let's not considered a blocker, and we can maybe ET contact John Erickson and see if he can write up some ducks or get a fix back. Ported quickly. I see.

B

That he self assigned himself two days ago, so maybe I could just ping him on the thread. It does say some things about how it wasn't even documented before so I guess. Maybe people earned it's this. It's the I guess likeness cross over that, and only other thing is a nexus to my three highlights that need to be sort of looked over and stuff. But from what I'm, seeing and like it's labeled apparently finished is there is no blockers. They would say that Nexus 2003 be ago, there is unmarked.

B

Failing to build packages in 2003 is broke literally. Something me to like ain't hardly to be like release 20, since it's like really sort of like manual and basically, unless it's release managers can do that and the highlights will just be probably done today. So that's what I'm saying is I think here's ago and I'm not sure if Samuel here he joined would like to see if he could agree on that, to used to have any extra opinions and his on schedule, don't see him yeah. So there's no has any proposed blockers.

B

I would say: that's fine! Our three years ago, and we could release probably whatever convenient I'm, not sure what is with Samuel. He did say he had some sort of a gap in his schedule for a week.

B

So that is something for us to sort of work out internally. So I can't exactly give a date, but I think is us. It might have been like two weeks or now.

B

So that's basically what it is.

A

B

Good yeah yeah, so next West 2003 years ago, just with some minor highlights finish today and then from that we'll just try to get it bilko's that sound good. Do you have no um columns or anything like that? No.

A

Sounds great okay,.

B

A

B

That's excellent! That's a great comfort from here; okay, I guess that ends this meeting. If there's nothing else to go over cool.

A

Can you post some specific ways that we can help you get this last bit of work done on the.

B

Specific way, so Florian is going to open the PR since he translated a doc. Look for me, so I'm pretty sure this thread right here. This issue I, could probably just drop it into the UM mix of a stove and that particular issue getting PR and I'm just gonna review it and there's any sort of is being missed in here, because we're kind of going- and um it must be honest- a bit quick with the highlights, because you really want to get it out. So whatever is in there.

B

If you don't make an addition, please try to like um a make a commit to that because, what's in there is probably just gonna get committed so yeah, that's, basically all I need helpless, very.

A

B

Yep fabulous I guess we can end this short.

A

Meetings, love the good.

B

Work: peace, exactly short meeting for the best meetings, all.

A

Right thanks yeah. Thank you. So much bye.