►
From YouTube: 2017-06-27 Node.js Foundation Public Board meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
C
D
D
B
C
C
G
D
G
This
the
amounts
they
listen.
Why
are
they
looking
for
and
the
only
considered
folks,
employers
did
not
like
you
know
if
there,
if
there
are
a
member
organization
or
if
they're
large
enough
company,
then
party,
to
cover
the
costs.
So
you
know
there,
there
is
betting
going
on
for
those
funds
and
everything.
B
So
y'all
I
believe
at
the
beginning
of
the
year
you
had
something
as
minimal
as
like
$10,000
in
the
total
budget
and
you've
only
spent
two
thousand,
so
you
had
eight
thousand.
The
46,000
is
what
I
figured
out
was
what
was
needed
for
the
remainder
of
the
year,
but
since
you
already
have
eight
thousand
remaining,
that
is
why
the
request
is
for
38.
C
C
E
I,
don't
believe
that
this
is
I
would
I
would
caution
the
board
to
conflate
travel
fun
with
the
marketing
event,
Odin
I
think
fundamentally
easily
different
things,
the
fact
that
they
have
to
be
like
you
know,
co-located
in
time
and
space,
it's
such
that
you
would
complete
them
in
any
way,
traveling
like
providing
an
ability
for
all
of
our
contributors
and
it's
not
in
any
way
how
far
kidding
it's
at
all
and
I.
Think
it's
really
quick
life
I
couldn't
think
of
better.
G
E
F
F
G
If
there's
going
to
be
a
travel
allocation
for
pom-pom
and
to
get
see
what
is
the
purpose
for
the
each
of
those
so
GIC
and
coming
up
have
some
direction
on
how
to
so.
If
it's
pom
conference,
this
is
going
to
be
primarily
managing
things
like
the
hood
and
learns
if
somebody
is
traveling
to
couldn't
learn
it
if
men's
work
and
this
fund
should
probably
come,
we
just
need
to
have
an
idea
of
and
I
think.
B
So
I
think
what
we
tried
to
do
is
add
slightly
bit
more
scope,
because
I
think
that's
what
Jay
is
kind
of
referring
to
is
that
if
we
are
talking
about
scope,
the
TSE
s
was
actually
slightly
more
broadly
written.
But
with
the
community
committee
allocation
document,
we
tried
to
be
slightly
more
specific,
with
the
understanding
that
we
need
to
be
careful
of
scope.
B
B
H
E
B
Yeah
I
was
gonna,
say
so
James.
This
was
open
as
a
PR
in
the
community
committee
repo
and
we
distinctly
and
specifically
calculated
for
the
explanation
of
the
calculation
was
put
in
there
and
that
included
accounting
for
people
who
were
from
various
working
groups
as
well
as
from
you
know,
corporate
member
organizations
and
those
sorts
of
things,
and
we
do
have
TSE
members
who
are
you
know,
and
the
thing
is
that
you
know
we
can
not
spend
that
money
right.
I
I
E
E
F
B
F
Right
so
my
name
is
cleaned
up
and
and
I
think
if
we
sink
into
pal
a
damn
question
and
I
didn't
think
question,
although
I
was
kind
of
and
take
my
word
for
it,
he
did
a
hand,
waved
and
down
plant
bins
that
it
happened
there
for
a
couple
of
months.
If
he
good,
you
just
have
a
statement
and
how
that's
all
gonna
play
out.
If
you
can
do
that.
C
C
C
C
E
E
E
E
G
E
G
D
C
C
J
C
I
H
J
B
B
F
F
I
D
C
C
E
E
E
K
K
C
H
H
H
H
G
G
G
J
J
J
J
J
E
J
J
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
G
G
G
G
G
G
C
C
B
H
B
Update
there
is
that
we're
moving
towards
alpha
testing
were
recruiting
for
beta
testing
users
and
that's
a
really
early
data.
That's
the
the
people
who
would
be
a
part
of
that
program
would
be
potentially
waiting
for
the
cut
score
to
be
established
which
allows
us
to
figure
out
at
what
point.
What
score
is
reasonable?
For
someone
to
be
passing
the
no
developer,
this
node
certified
developer
exam.
B
Yeah
so
last
board
meeting
I
believe
I
had
updated
with
q3
because
of
infrastructure.
We
had
been
working
on
with
hacker
rank
and
the
LS
and
coordinating
all
of
that
was
moving
slower
than
expected,
and
also
the
cat
herding
of
40
contributors
to
the
item.
Reading
questions
as
well,
so
our
plan
is
to
have
absolutely
release
in
q3
and
we
would
have
we're
looking
towards
some
exciting
things
that
we
can
do
in
an
on-site
at
a
node
interactive.
Even
though
it's
an
online
certification.