►
From YouTube: 2017-28-09 Community Committee(CommComm) Public Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
E
A
A
A
A
This
was
peer
submitted
to
the
Avengers
of
working
group
and
then
kind
of
up
hoarded
or
backboard
it
as
well
to
the
community
committee.
So
it
he's
put
some
work
into
it
and
it
looks
like
a
good
bureau
to
me,
but
I
want
to
see
if
there's
any
other
objections
on
that,
because
it's
its
code
of
conduct
so
wanted
to
see.
If
there's
any
things,
it's
just
minor
kind
of
edits
around
that
no
objections.
Nope.
A
So
adding
a
calm,
calm
section
to
the
no
GS
website.
This
is
something
I
created
yesterday,
I
think
or
no
three
days
ago,
that
I
noticed
that
there's
a
huge
DLC
section
from
when
that
was
created
when
the
website
stuff
and
the
TSE
work
have
been
done,
but
we
haven't
actually
done
a
similar
thing
for
the
community
committee.
I
think
that'd
be
a
great
thing
to
kind
of
get
a
start
working
on
that
content.
A
E
B
A
F
E
Okay,
so
so
Teresa
and
I
are
aren't
going
to
be
there
for
the
whole
collaborator
summit,
because
we
have
to
come
back
to
New
York
to
work
on
Empire
Kampf.
But
if
it's
something
that
we
could
do
like
the
first
day
of
the
summit
and
then
we
can
have
a
hangouts
link
for
people
that
aren't
attending
I.
Think
that
would
be
helpful.
C
F
A
B
B
H
E
E
A
No,
okay,
on
to
the
next
agenda
item,
so
this
is
the
internationalization
and
localization
working
groups
issue.
This
is
an
older
issue
that
we
still
had
tagged.
The
CC
agenda.
I
wasn't
sure
if
it
was
something
we
just
didn't
get
the
tech
removed
or
if
there
was
further
discussion
we
needed
to
have
around
this.
Does
anyone
else
have
context
on
that?
There's.
E
E
F
F
I
literally
just
like
had
a
template
request
with
some
kind
words
that
I
pasted
in
a
bunch
of
the
local
countries
groups
and
how
many
people
responded
really
quickly
to
help
out
with
that.
I
think
you'll
end
up
getting
a
lot
of
people
engaging
in
a
similar
fashion
that
way
and
then
also
reaching
out
on
Twitter.
F
You
might
just
want
to
say,
like
are
you
interested
in
doing
this
type
of
work,
because
it
would
be
great
to
get
again
from
I
think
we
talked
about
this
last
session
when,
when
Michael
and
tyranny
and
I
had
had
had
thought
about
it
in
another
meeting,
was
the
idea
of
like
every
time
we're
doing
one
of
these
initiatives?
It's
a
really
good
idea
to
reach
out
on
Twitter
and
in
our
social
media
or
slacks
and
say:
hey
we're
starting
up
this
really
cool
thing
again
or
we're
trying
to
put
energy
towards
it.
E
Because
I
think
it
would
be
a
really
really
good
opportunity
for
people
to
also
get
involved
with
the
project
without
having
to
like
necessarily,
you
know,
make
a
contribution
to
core
Italy.
It's
like
a
good
first
step
to
like
put
your
dip,
your
toes
in
the
water,
the
note
and
yeah.
So
should
we
maybe
close
this
issue.
E
H
B
A
B
C
A
That
was
so.
This
is
another
issue
around
it's
an
older
issue
that
we
tagged
with
CC
agenda
I,
don't
necessarily
know
if
the
tag
did
or
the
label
I
always
say
that
if
the
label
just
didn't
get
removed
from
my
understanding
of
this
thread,
it
seems
like
it's
largely
been
addressed
with
them.
The
current
moderation
team,
but
I
did
want
to
kind
of
bring
it
up
here
to
see
if
it
can
be
posed.
If
there's
anything
further
that
we
need
to
do
with
it,
I
think.
E
I
I
F
F
I
F
I
F
A
F
F
Both
of
those
yeah,
both
of
those
repos
are
appropriate
places.
His
admin
is
the
jointly
owned
and
moderation.
It's
possible
that
those
conversations
are
happening
in
the
moderation,
repo,
but
I
think
those
kinds
of
issues
are
best.
It's
weird,
because
moderation,
guidelines
and
policy
should
be
surfaced
to
the
public
and
not
just
collaborators.
Those
conversations
are
probably
best
to
happen
in
the
admin
repo,
because
that
is
public,
whereas
the
moderation
repose
is
something
we've
talked
about
with
the
moderation
team.
The
moderation
repo
is
clearly
not
visible
to
everyone
at
is
private
to
the
collaborators.
I
I
I
F
E
B
A
A
This
I
I
would
say
this
falls
in
our
scope
and
just
trying
to
help
out
with
this
because
I
know
there's
it's
been
attempted
in
the
past,
but
it
hasn't
quite
worked
on
the
YouTube
end.
So
if
we
could
help
with
this,
that'd
be
great,
but
if
we
can't
that
that's
fine
I'm
willing
to
try
to
dedicate
some
time
to
this
on
helping
the
foundation
and
zippy
or
Tracy
or
whoever
else
I
would
need
to
help
with
on
that.
F
A
F
A
A
C
So
it
wasn't
changed
too
much
from
the
last
version
and
the
new
repo
there's
still
you
know
some
comments
going
on
in
there.
I
think
the
the
main
blocker
right
now
is
there's
at
least
a
few
people
who
are
saying
we
really
need
to
get
our
values
documented
before
we
publish
doc
and
I've
pasted
in
the
TSE
minute.
The
minutes
from
the
TSE
meeting
earlier
this
week,
because
miles
did
share
an
early
list
of
potentially
what
those
might
be
and
so
I
think.
C
F
C
The
the
other
sort
of
context
that
went
in
the
discussion
that
did
take
place
is
that
it
may
also
make
sense
to
have
values
for
individual
working
groups.
So,
for
example,
you
know
the
build
working
group
might
have
a
set
of
values
of
benchmarking
and
so
forth,
and
what
that
might
do
is
it
might
avoid
us
having
to
have,
like
you
know,
a
set
of
values
that
pulls
in
absolutely
everything
you
know
with
these.
Being
you
know
for
that.
C
This
sort
of
indeed
min
I
was
thinking
in
the
min
repo
for
sort
of
the
top
level.
Here's
our
values.
This
applies
to
everything
and
then
the
more
technical
ones
might
actually
fit
into
the
particular
working
group.
So
you
might
have
a
set
four
core
benchmarking,
so
so
that's
just
a
little
bit
more
the
context
of
what
was
discussed
there.
What
can
we
like,
where.
F
I
think
it's
really
valuable
for
us
to
decide
this
as
a
group,
as
a
larger
group
to
community
committee
could
do
this
for
just
the
community
committee
as
well
as
an
exercise,
and
that
would
be
a
good
practice
as
well.
I
think
there's
there's
some
really
good
examples
in
open
source
of
this
to
it
sort
of
carries
over
like
I
sort
of
think
of
the
Zen
of
Python.
In
some
ways
you
know
having
been
adopted
by
the
Python
community.
Overall,
you
know,
they'll
have
something
listed
out
like
explicit
is
better
than
implicit,
but
behind.
F
That
is
because
you
know
they
care
about
humans
and
don't
want
people
to
have
to
go
wonder
or
assume
things,
and
so
I
think
that
these
sort
of
value
statements
are
very
exciting
and
there's
other
places.
You
can
look
for
precedents
if
you
want
inspiration
or
if
you
want
to
carry
something
over
from
another
community
that
you've
fine,
they
do
really
well
and
that
you
think
should
be
represented
with
ours
and
that
we
do.
C
So
yeah
so
hopefully
the
you
know
the
open
country
and
that's
a
great
idea:
yeah
I,
look
to
the
other
ones
that
they
have
some
great
statements
like
that.
We
and
say
hey
that
that
represents
what
we
want
to
do
as
well
and
I'm,
hoping
that
you
know
this
is
we
don't
have
to
get
it
perfect?
The
first
time
I
think
getting
something
which
is
good
and
getting
it
in
place
and
then
working
on
you
know
improving
it
over
time.
This
is
better
than
spending
forever
and
not
landing
it
in.
C
C
C
A
A
A
C
I
I
B
F
F
But
I
think
it
is
an
interesting
talk
to
listen
to
to
challenge
what
you
think
about
what
values
are
and
what
values
would
be
4-node
compared
to
what
Brian
perceives
them
to
be,
and
in
Raphael
to
consider
more
about
what
what
happens
when
folks,
who
are
attached
in
some
way
to
our
project,
because
they've
contributed
in
really
remarkable
ways
over
the
years
and
they
speak
on
their
own
behalf
about
things
that
they
believe
in.
It's
really
tough
to
say,
like
that's,
not
I,
do
believe.
F
C
Yeah
that
definitely
and
I
think
it
can
be
different
kinds
of
values
like
things
like
the
last
one
on
the
list
was
valuing
speed,
but
not
at
the
cost
of
reliability
is
more
of
a
technical
thing,
so
we'll
have
to
find
the
right
mix
of
you
know.
What's
what
should
be
in
the
top
level?
Values
would
be
like
in
the
values
and
so
forth.
I
At
some
points
to
the
head
and
the
vote
is
sometimes
you
need
to
pick
one
value
over
the
other,
and
people
would
tend
to
look
at
the
value.
The
mission
statement
that
the
value
lists,
as
sort
of
like,
if
you
take
American
governances
like
that
Constitution,
where
everything
else
is
derived
from
that
and
they're
gonna,
be
very
emotional
and
passionate.
F
F
C
B
Yeah,
that
is
something
that
is
something
I
would
really
like
to
discuss
it
in
person.
I've
known
interactive,
like
I,
don't
know
cool
view
will
be
actually
there.
For
me,
this
is
very
important
to
actually
meet
you
it
in
person
and
get
a
better
understanding
and
talk
about
things
we
can
talk
about.
Otherwise,
because
this
is
like
so
far
away
like
you
know
what
what
what
Brian
is
mentioning.
That
I
personally
think
is
value
that
but
I
just
think
time.
I
understand
you
have
to
be
sensible
about
approaching
this
I.
B
A
J
A
E
B
Yeah
I
didn't
one
like
you
know,
share
I,
just
like
complain
or
anything.
It's
just
for
me.
It's
very
I
want
to
be
more
constructive
and
I
hope
that
meeting
in
person
we
will
find
ways
and,
and
what
we
can
do
it
is
like
going
a
few
steps
towards
each
other,
because
right
now,
I,
don't
know
what
these
types
would
be.