►
From YouTube: 2017-05-25 Node.js Community Committee Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
Foundation,
community
community
meeting
for
May
25th
2017
we're
going
to
skip
a
couple
of
the
early
parts
of
the
meeting
just
to
catch
up
on
time.
So
we
will
skip
the
previous
agenda
from
the
previous
meeting
and
we'll
just
go
on
and
dive
right
into
our
current
agenda.
So
we're
going
to
start
off
with
pull
requests
number
50.
We
have
a
pull
request
open
to
make
some
charter
changes
that
I
made
it's
mostly
some
pretty
small
stuff.
B
It
changes
the
participation
rules
to
match
what
the
TSC
has
mostly
stuff
is
just
getting
it
aligned
with
the
TSV,
and
the
other
thing
it
does
is
it
adds
a
new
entry
in
our
list
of
responsibilities,
which
is
specifically
education
initiatives.
This
is
something
that
I
think
we
just
forgot
when
we
added
it
originally
I.
Could
it's
very
much
within
our
scope,
but
so
Steve
little
context
on
process
on
this?
B
B
A
B
So
moving
on
from
that,
this
is
also
another
thing
just
to
kind
of
let
you
know
that
I
did
I
found
an
issue
in
the
TSC
z-bo.
This
is
number
270,
and
this
is
a
formal
request
to
go
ahead
and
move
moderation,
responsibilities
and
do
these
things
like
that
from
the
TSC
to
calm,
calm.
This
is
something
I
think
we
most
of
us
have
talked
about
doing
at
some
point
in
time,
and
so
now
it's
a
matter
of
basically
doing
all
the
paperwork
and
going
through
the
process
to
get
that
officially
transferred
I.
C
B
B
Currently,
the
concern
is
that
you
know
whenever
people
are
moderating
a
thread
there,
there's
a
certain
amount
of
context
in
any
given
thread
and
the
decision
she
moderate
or
not
moderate
is
often
based
on
having
context
of
the
discussion.
You
know
it
is
something
dérailleur
or
not
is
something.
For
example,
you
know
typically
three
things
you
need
to
know
what's
being
talked
about
so.
C
F
C
I
appreciate
Michaels
concern
in
that.
He
is
right
that,
in
the
current
context
of
what
moderation
covers,
it
makes
sense
for
the
TSC
to
have
moderation,
but
because
the
community
committee
covers
a
difference
than
just
the
github
repos
that
the
TSC
oversees
it
makes
sense
for
moderation
to
expand
on
that.
Eventually,
right,
like
moderation,
is
not
moderation
only
for
its.
If
my
understanding
was
the
intention
was
not
just
for
moderation
to
be
only
moderation
for
technical
conversations,
overseen
by
the
TSE.
C
G
Yeah
I
I,
guess
I
see
your
point.
That,
like
moderation,
is
a
bigger
issue.
I
was
just
thinking,
as
you
were
talking
like
I,
don't
know
if
some
ideas
of
like
having
moderators
from
those
you
know
designated
from
those
projects
helps
as
part
of
the
model
or
me.
You
know
like
I
could
see
the
the
sort
of
overall
ownership
and
moderation
fitting
in
with
the
community
committee,
because
you're
going
to
want
to
moderate
you
know
it.
G
C
A
C
Gonna,
first,
import
and
I
know
people
will
generally
follow
rules
when
the
rules
are
in
place.
But
when
folks,
who
are
working
together
in
those
front
in
those
repos
they're
familiar
with
one
another-
and
they
are,
you
know
they
have
representation
in
moderation,
then
they
feel
more
supported.
You
know
from
the
outside,
but
you
also
have
people
within
that
group
saying
like
all
right.
You
know
we
got
to
moderate
you
and
that
I
think
it's
way
more
powerful
when
those
people
have
that
you
have
the
by.
In
writing.
G
B
Yep
and
that's
actually
exactly
what
my
intention
is-
is
yeah
by
bringing
moderation
to
calm,
calm,
it's
really
moving
from,
but
she
was
C
to
conquer
are
the
things
that
the
TSE
is
responsible
for.
If
we
look
at
day-to-day
moderation
with
sent
today,
it's
very
really
the
TSC
people
who
actually
do
it.
You
know
it's
people
who
are
involved
in
the
threats
and
context
and
I
very
much
once
you
continue
in
that
series.
I
think
that's
actually
worked
pretty
well
for
mostly
tomorrow
education
on
that
rock
and
so
really.
B
Alright,
okay,
I
think
I,
guess
that
was
very
cycle.
Oh
yeah,
so,
like
the
idea
is
that
we're
really
just
overseeing
the
process?
You
know
we
can
like
kind
of
help
craft
policies.
You
know
we
want
to
solicit
input.
Just
like
sees
the
oversee
the
process
of
getting
policies
like
passed
and
implemented,
but
not
that
we
actually
want
to
chew
it.
I
mean
work,
really
see
I
created
this
a
good
time
enough
and
you
know
just
resources
to
do
it.
So
yeah
I
very
much
like
to
me
where
we
are
it's
just
helicopter
policies
around.
G
E
A
B
Yeah
and
yeah,
and
definitely
any
like
policy
change
that
we
proposed,
and
we
definitely
would
want
to
you-
know,
pull
in
the
CTC,
pulling
the
TSC
an
emotional
project
and
get
feedback
on
it.
It
looks
like
today,
like
anytime,
I,
have
a
TSE
issue
come
up.
We
usually
get
a
lot
of
feedback
from
people
not
on
the
TSE
as
well,
and
we
want
that
feedback
early.
The
same
thing
yeah.
B
Yep
absolutely
and
also
I
think
this
will
anyway
free
up
the
TSU
to
focus
on
more
technical
matters.
I
know,
that's
one
of
the
problems
we've
had
on
the
TSU
recently
is
there's
this
sort
of
odd
split
of
like
things
we
have
to
do
and
the
skill
sets
going
with
them.
So
moderation
is
one
of
them,
there's
also
some
administration
stuff
as
well.
We
also
I'm
talking
about
Sonia
and
I
view.
This
is
very
much
within
that
vein,
so
you
know
this
is
very
much
to
help
the
TSE
as
well.
B
Let's
look
at
this
is
issue
number
45
on
the
comic-con
repo.
This
is
expanding
the
node.js
collection,
the
viewers
way,
so
we
have
someone
from
the
Nocera.
Would
you
like
to
give
some
like
background
on
this
sure.
H
We
worked
with
Tierney
and
Ross
problem
ski
at
earlier
in
the
year
to
develop
a
sort
of
a
entire
program
around
turning
our
node
medium
blog
into
a
note
collection,
which
means
turning
into
a
publication
using
medium
which
would
allow
for
outside
contribution
of
content
from
the
community.
It
allows
you
to
do
a
lot
more
commenting
and
sharing
and
create
more
of
a
viral
network
effect
with
the
content.
H
Hopefully,
so,
we've
launched
this
publication
for
medium
in
February
and
devised
sort
of
a
whole
got
set
of
guidelines
on
what
type
of
content
we
would
be
looking
for
in
what
type
of
review
process
we
would
have
and
the
review
board-
and
it's
it's
been
doing
fairly
well,
it's
had
some
good
traction.
I
think
the
review
process,
though,
needs
to
be
the
review
board,
needs
to
be
expanded
because
one
thing
it's
from
the
node.js
foundation,
side,
myself
or
zippy
actually
and
Sadie.
H
H
Pictures
accurate
accurate
that
it's
credible
content
that
it's
something
we
wanted
to
we'd
want
to
publish
and
that's
where
there's
been
we
haven't
had
is
sort
of
even
participation
there.
So
we'd
like
to
make
it
a
bigger
review
board
and
we'd
also
like
to
suggest
a
change
to
our
process,
which
our
process
is
linked
to
on
github
we'd
like
to
recommend
that
there
needs
to
be
at
least
we
were
going
to
say
at
least
one.
H
Maybe
we
want
to
say
at
least
two
technical
reviewers
that
would
initial
a
submission
to
ensure
that
you
know
we
would
do
the
copy
at
its
side
and
that
there
would
also
be
proof
or
a
paper
trail.
You
know
through
the
initialing
that
some
technical
experts
also
did
a
review.
That
was
going
to
be
our
suggestion.
I
guess
my
one-
and
we
have
what's
also
documented
in
our
process
guideline-
is
how
quickly
we
try
to
turn
around
and
give
feedback
to
someone
letting
them
know.
H
Is
your
submission
going
to
be
accepted,
or
do
we
need
you
to
do
X,
Y,
&
Z,
so
the
one
thing
that
has
been
working
is:
we've
gotten
a
lot
of
content
populated
through
publication,
but
we
would
like
to
get
engage
more
technical
experts
without
hopefully
slowing
down
the
review
cycles
and
still
being
able
to
get
a
really
good
flow
of
content
going.
H
C
Important
for
note,
people
who
are
doing
this
sort
of
thing
I
think
someone
who
commits
to
being
able
to
do
this
technical
reviewing.
This
is
something
that
you
can
like
where
right
like
you
can
say
you
are
a
technical
reviewer
for
the
node
collection
and
I.
Think
that
that's
really
important
I,
don't
think
people
really
I,
don't
know
if
people
really
understood
like
that's
that's
valuable
to
some
people.
C
So
if
we
can
find
folks
who
are
looking
to
expand
this
as
a
talent
of
theirs
or
something
that
they'd
like
to
put
on
their
resume,
that's
absolutely
something
that
can
do
and
they
would
be
doing
as
a
fairly
regular
commitment.
I
was
trying
to
think
from
just
from
a
work
perspective.
Sarah.
Can
you
recall
how
many
submissions
we
tend
to
get
in
a
month.
H
I
know
I
think
we're
getting
like
one
zippy
was
gone,
for
example
the
last
vacation
she
took,
you
know
we're
getting
like
three
or
four
a
week.
You
know
some
weeks
are
a
little
more
active
some
weeks
slow
down,
but
it's
a
pretty
steady.
At
least
two
to
three
are
coming
in.
It's
been
a
pretty
good
response,
which
is
been
great
and.
F
I'd
like
to
add
to
that
that
you
know,
as
the
collection
grows,
that
would
likely
be
the
goal
of
that.
What
do
we
need
to
increase
that
volume
and
to
continue
kind
of
growing
it
as
a
community
resource
for
nodejs
content?
And
so
you
know
that's
it's
like
about
15
months,
I.
Think
at
this
point-
and
you
know
some
of
those
are
articles
that
you
know
doesn't
really
start
a
kind
of
coherent
article.
You
gotta
say
goes
it's
it's.
It
would
be
too
much
work
on
the
review
side.
You're.
F
No,
as
a
just
a
normal
kind
of
editing
process
to
go
flesh
that
out,
like
it'd,
be
writing
the
article
a
lot
of
yourself
or
as
a
review
process.
But
you
know
there
is
a
lot
of
good
and
strong
technical
kind
of
that
does
come
through
and
does
in
review,
and
so
you
know,
I
think
the
technical
side
at
this
point
would
probably
be
ten
articles
a
month
in
review,
and
you
know
split
between
five
people
that
are
able
to
kind
of
work
on
that
review
process.
C
A
rare
occasion
we've
had
oh
sorry,
okay,
yeah
I
was
going
to
say.
On
the
rare
occasion,
we've
had
the
hiccup
where
someone
has
like
transferred
over
an
article
that
had
already
been
published
and
then
edits
were
accidentally
published
as
part
of
that.
But
that
is
not
a
common
practice
and
we
have
actually
have,
as
Sarah
said,
a
process
and
documented
guidelines
that
are
already
in
place
and
there's
I
believe
the
first
medium
post
that
we
head
out
for
the
note
collection
was
actually
talking
about
this
yeah,
but
that's
that's
also.
C
A
F
Give
a
little
bit
of
context
like
a
kind
of
overhead
view
of
how
the
process
is.
Now.
You
submit
your
article
to
the
two
medium
at
nodejs,
calm
or
is
it
editor's,
I
think
I'm
pretty
sure
it's
medium,
no
js'
calm
and
then
you
know
the
dag
gets
forwarded
to
a
group
of
people.
F
I
think
there's
eight
or
nine
and
those
people
are
the
ones
who
have
been
included
in
the
review,
and
so
that
process
is
documented
in
the
evangelism
working
group
repo
as
an
issue,
there's
also
a
doc
that
I
don't
know
where
that
dog
lives
like
where
the
link
for
that
is.
F
But
the
dog
has
been
moved
over
to
the
evangelism
repo
as
well,
and
that,
in
addition
to
the
original
article,
have
been
I'll
I'll
link
to
those
in
the
the
issue
that
were
the
community
committee,
repo
issue
that
we're
talking
about
now
there
at
the
bottom
there.
So.
B
B
H
B
Know
if
you
have
to,
which
is
something
that
and
we
can
certainly
do
get
in
front
of
permissions
model
idea,
have
team
is
just
a
name
group
of
people
and
you
can
assign
permissions
based
on.
But
another
thing
you
can
do
where
I
think
it'd
be
helpful.
Here
is,
you
can
add,
mention
a
team
and
github.
So
you
go
like
hey
at
nodejs,
slash
collaborators,
that's
plenty.
For
example,
it
will
notify.
It
will
send
a
notification
to
every
single
collaborate.
B
We
could
create
one,
that's
specifically
for
people
who
have
agreed
to
help
out
in
this
way.
There's
a
repo
around.
It
was
like
a
place
to
organize
and
also
like
a
place
to
protect
people.
It's
like
when
it
reviews
are
coming
out,
could
open
Vichy
is
saying:
hey.
We
have
five
submissions,
you
know
who's
if
she
didn't
help
me
out
I
bit
that
way,
I
head
up
top
of
my
head.
What
does
anyone
else
think.
C
B
H
B
Probably
gonna
say
the
same
thing:
I
think
that's
we're
having
like
a
repo
with
help,
there's
sort
of
the
landing
page
that
people
can
see
it.
We
can
actually
start
by.
You
know
at
mentioning.
You
know
just
no
js',
logical
operators
or
CTC
and
TSE.
We
can
mention
it
in
their
meetings
as
well,
be
like
hey
we're
just
looking
for
people
who
are
interested
in
helping
out
so
stop
by
if
you're
interested.
C
Yeah,
what
I
was
going
to
say
is
that
I
think
that
to
expand
I
think
github
is
but
one
place
that
people
socialize
and
that
this
kind
of
brings
up
the
large
or
outreach
energy
that
we
could
have.
But
we
could
lean
on
everyone's
network
within
the
community
committee
to
share
this
as
well
and
offer
that
either
as
reaching
out
to
individuals
and
saying
hey,
I.
Think
you'd
be
really
good
for
this.
C
If
you
have
the
time
its
base
to
do
it,
because
that's
generally
more
effective
than
doing
a
mass
blast
on
Twitter,
but
you
never
know
we
might
be
able
to
reach
someone
who
is
really
capable
of
doing
this
and
just
didn't
think,
there's
an
opportunity.
G
I'd
also
suggest
you
you,
you
know
kind
of
you're
pitching
that
day.
This
is
something
people
can
point
to
and
say,
hey
look
I'm
doing
this,
so
it
kind
of
adds
to
your
resume
or
whatever
it
might
be
good
to
like
figure
out
where
you're
gonna
you
know,
can
you
list
those
people
as
reviewers
on
the
github
readme
page
or
whatever,
somewhere,
where
they
could
sort
of
point
back
to
make
it?
B
G
H
We
could
put
there
sort
of
like
a
description
of
off
that
sort
of
just
generically
or
not
generically,
but
specifically
rather
describes
what
our
publication
is
about
and
I
think
we
could
list
them
there.
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
how
authors
would
actually
feel
if
all
the
editors
were
always
listed
against
their
articles,
one
by
one
to
be
honest,
but
the.
C
F
G
H
Mean
I
think
the
goal,
though,
also
is
to
do
a
technical.
Edit,
not
I
mean
a
review,
and
it
you
don't
always.
There
will
always
have
to
be
a
heavy
edit
I
mean
right,
so
you
know
I,
don't
think
the
goal
is
to
do
extensive,
hopefully
not
in
some
case,
in
many
cases,
edits
and
cycles
and
just
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
that.
You
know
yeah.
G
G
H
That's
why
to
be
I,
think
it
actually
there
one
there's
that
the
goal
to
maybe
scale
it
I'd
rather
try
to
get.
You
know
three
to
four,
maybe
five,
consistent
editors,
that
sort
of
participate.
You
know
I
understand
if
they
might
want
to
pass
a
baton
after
doing
it
for
a
certain
time
period,
but
I
think
it's
easier
to
maintain
sort
of
the
process
and
the
quality.
If
toriel
group
is
a
little
tighter,
yep.
C
B
Okay,
so
to
kind
of
summarize
the
things
we
talked
about
so
far,
it
sounds
to
me
like.
There
are
two
key
action
items
that
we
have
to
miss.
One
is
to
work
on
really
defining
the
the
process
for
editing
and
like
how
people
get
attributed
as
editors
and
things
like
that,
what's
expected
of
editors,
what
that
process
is
like
and
I'd
imagine
is
probably
just
documenting
things.
You've
already
figured
out
mostly
yeah,.
B
F
H
B
Yeah
and
I
think
the
the
collaborative
ace
will
definitely
be
behind
that.
You
know
everyone
wants
to
make
sure
that
the
set
being
written
got
note
is
that
correct
yeah.
Some
people
have
very
strong
opinions
on
that.
Even
so,
yeah
I,
don't
think
interest
will
be
a
problem.
It's
just
fine,
actually
finding
the
specific
individuals
getting
them
on
boarded
and
okay
yeah.
B
B
B
H
Thank
you,
guys,
I'm,
going
to
jump
off
as
it's
kind
of
getting
into
dinner.
Time
and
I
have
a
stem
night
tonight
with
my
kids.
So.
H
Thank
you.
Everyone
thanks,
Sarah
thanks,
bye,
all.
B
Right
next
up
is
issue
number
38,
adding
folks.
As
members
we've
had
some
discussion
around
this
I
think
I'm
pretty
good.
We
still
don't
have
actual
artifacts
from
that,
though
you
know
we.
Ultimately,
what
we
really
want
to
get
out
of
this
is
a
contributing
guide.
You're
like
a
concluding
dmg
file.
B
B
I
mean
I
certainly
have
my
opinions
on
this
like
I.
Do
think
this
is
something
that
we
really
should
get
figured
out,
because
you
know
we
arguing
people
who
come
in.
You
want
to
contribute
and
right
now
it's
just
kind
of
hand-wavy
of
like
yeah
come
help
out,
but
then
we
don't
actually
really
help
people
to
understand
what
that
means.
What
the
purpose
of
membership
is
where,
where
it's
useful
in,
why
you
might
want
to
become
one
as
well
I.
B
Yeah,
so
I
definitely
am
in
my
head
on
modeling
Hong
Kong
after
the
TSC,
and
that
we
are
more
of
like
an
administrative
overhead
body,
won't
be
doing
a
lot
of
work
ourselves
like
as
a
governing
body
I.
Even
if
the
individuals
on
you
know
who
are
members
will
be,
and
instead,
what
we
really
want
to
do
is
start
spinning
up,
like
teams
and
working
groups
under
us,
to
really
focus
on
solving
specific
problems.
B
Now
we're
not
there
yet
we
hope
to
bring
education
under,
but
that
will
probably
be
the
first
sub
moderation
work
coming
in.
You
know
when
that
happens,
what
happens
somewhere
and
so
I
think
have
fun
I.
Don't
really
have
a
good
answer
for
this,
yet
is
what
how
do
we
broach
this
first
like
like?
Where
do
we
want
to
get
started?
You
know
that
I
feel
like
it's
a
bit
of
a
chicken
and
egg
here.
Do
you
wanna
start
spinning
up
teams
with
the
con
combi
way
it
is
and
really
started,
pushing
the
teams.
D
Yeah
I
think
we
want
to
start
getting
some
teams
going.
We
just
had
a
discussion
about
starting
a
team
up
right
because
otherwise,
what
will
have
as
people
that
will
attend
meetings
and
they'll
they'll,
sit
there
for
a
long
time
off
their
specific
interest,
talking
about
other
things
and
so
yeah
I'd
rather
have
the
teams,
where
they're
going
to
talk
about
their
exact
interest
and
keep
people
more
engaged
and
not
not
like
give
an
environment
where
they
want
to
skip
a
meeting,
because
it's
just
it's
not
the
stuff.
C
I
think
this
is
just
so.
What
we're
talking
about
here
is
really
just
doing
like
this
contributing
MD
file
which
points
people
in
the
direction
so
that
you
can
say
you
just
go
here:
we've
got
these
teams.
These
are
how
you
get
started
with
these
teams.
A
cop
on
in
right.
Are
you
talking
about
like
defining
member,
more
I.
B
Think
it's
a
bit
of
both
catalyst
or,
like
I,
think
well,
I
think
I'm
a
good
definition
of
what
a
member
is.
We
haven't
really
defined,
but
we
determine
what
it
isn't
in
a
like
sort
of
legal
Charter
perspective,
but
we
haven't
defined
how
we
add
members
to
column
and
I.
Think
part
of
that
comes
from.
We
don't
have
a
clear
vision
yet,
in
my
opinion,
what
exactly
like
the
day-to-day
responsibilities
of
comic-con?
Even
if
we
know
what
the
high
level
responsibilities
are
and
I
at
least
feel
it.
B
C
B
Think
it's
a
bit
of
both
so
like
if
someone
wants
to
become
a
member
like
how
do
they
signify
that
interest?
Specifically,
you
know
we
don't
have
a
if
you
want
to
become
in
the
bird
click.
This
link
fill
this
thing
out.
The
process
looks
like
this.
You
will
receive
your
answer.
Yes
or
no.
This
way,
I,
like
the
mechanics
of
adding
other
I
guess,
is
what
I'm
getting
at
oh
I.
C
Thought
we
did
that
last
time
where
it
was
a
discussion.
I
thought
that
hadn't,
it's
maybe
that
we
just
need
to
finish
going
through.
That
action.
Was
that
someone
just
files,
an
issue
saying
they
want
to
be
a
member,
and
so
they
get
at
it
as
an
observer
and
then
from
there
they
get
if
they
go
to
the.
A
C
Sorry,
that's
why
I'm
just
this
I
mean
there's
things
we
have
to
do.
That
may
need
to
be
carried
on,
that
we're
missed
from
a
prior
notes,
and
that's
my
that's
my
fault
but
yeah.
So
I
thought
that
we
had.
We
had
established
that
I
do
like
the
idea
of
just
like
going
ahead
in
the
contributing
MD
and
being
like
a
little
more
colloquial
about
hey,
like
we're.
C
Gonna
have
these
teams,
we
have
the
note
collection
team,
we're
gonna,
have
the
you
know:
education,
team,
we're
gonna,
have
these
cool
things
so
and
you
know
they're
looking
for
help
and
then
it's
the
responsibility
of
those
teams
right
to
also
say,
like
here's,
somehow,
here's
things
that
we
need
or
just
go
to
look
at
the
issues
list.
We've
got
labels
for
things.
We
need
help
with.
F
I
tried
trimming
it
earlier,
but
it
like
hang
out
scratch
really
weird
I
have
had
three
people
independently
come
ask
me:
how
can
I
start
doing
this
and
I
pointed
them
to
the
repo
and
dirt
I
as
I'm
doing
that?
I
realized
I,
don't
really
know
what
the
next
that,
like
I,
tell
that
you
know
instructing.
While
you
can
start
commenting
on
issues,
you
can
start
opening
issues
with
your
ideas
joining
things
like
that
joining
in
there's
no
solid
pass.
That
I
can
really
go
point.
F
Someone
to
to
say
here's,
here's
something
you
didn't
get
go
to
kind
of,
like
the
your
first
yard
type
thing
that
that
level
of
interaction
so
I'm,
just
curious.
If
that's
something
that
maybe
we
could
go
define
like
is
some
kind
of
first
step
for
people
to
go
do,
and
the
community
committee,
like
we're
saying,
is
the
kind
of
governing
body
of
these
teams.
F
C
B
Yeah,
let's
do
that
as
a
next
step,
so
I'm
going
to
recommend
if
everyone
else
is
okay
with
this
that
we
take
off
the
CC
agenda
label
for
membership
for
now,
I
think
we
need
to
flush
this
other
stuff
outfit
first,
we
said:
that's
what
I
feel
about
that.
Does
everyone
else
agree
where's.
Anyone
want
to
like
flip
their
round
and
kind
of
do
the
other
way.
B
Yep
I
agree
as
well,
so
I'll
go
into
CC
agenda
off
of
that
issue
and
then
here,
if
you
can
go
on
file
an
issue,
she's
created
contributing
good
and
yeah.
We'll
work
on
that
and
I.
Don't
have
any
expectations
we'll
get
that
done
quickly
because
I
think
we,
you
know
we're
still
figuring
out
what
it
is
we
do
and
and
thus
how
people
can
contribute.
Maybe.
B
B
C
I
Sure
so
I
was
talking
to
Tracy
about
this
because
I
guess
back
in
the
fall,
we
were
trying
to
think
of
ways
for
node
together
to
exist
so
that
we're
able
to
you
know
partner
with
conferences
and
other
places
that
are
running
events
and
want
to
be
able
to
like
keep
on
running
things
for
like
the
community,
but
the
way
to
fund
that
would
be
either
to
create
a
individual
entity
which,
like
I,
just
learned
how
to
write
checks
like
two
years
ago.
I
And
then
we
were
also
talking
this
week
about
how
it
might
be
beneficial
to
have
note
together,
since
it
is
education
and
evangelism
ends,
like
a
bunch
of
other
outreach
things
kind
of
into
one
having
it
having
moving
the
repository
under
the
Jer
diction
of
calm
calm,
so
that
we're
able
to
know
tightly
a
mission
of
wanting
to
provide
education
to
newcomers.
Newcomers
specifically
underrepresented
minorities,
while
also
being
like
friendly
and
welcoming
to
anyone
that
wants
to
help
out
and
that
kind
of
stuff
Tracy
might
be
able
to
live.
I
C
Yeah,
so
we
had
a
familiarized,
the
idea
of
note,
together
being
a
part
of
the
foundation
and
Ashley
and
I
had
talked
about
that
last
year,
after
node,
together
had
partnered
with
node
live
for
a
pretty
cool
season
of
events
and
the
board
I
know
like
individual
board
members
that
I've
talked
to
really
loved
what
notes
the
other
stands
for,
and
so
we
had
looked
at
the
idea
of.
C
So
you
know
we
we
want
to
make
sure
people
don't
feel
like
we're.
Taking
up
the
space.
You
know
from
other
organizations
who
are
doing
cool
work,
but
we
do
think
they
know
together
kind
of
matches.
What
you
know
the
mission
of
the
foundation
is,
so
anybody
have
questions,
concerns
cuz,
we'll
get
well
we'll
have
plenty
of
questions
left
to
answer
to
the
board
as
well.
B
Just
one
little
comment
and
I
mentioned
this
in
the
issues
well,
I
was
looking
at
the
Charter
I,
just
kind
of
double
checking
some
stuff.
We
actually
there's
not
a
place
for
education
initiatives
in
there
or
I.
Didn't
feel
like
does
anything
that,
even
if
we
like
stretched
it
with
it
so
I
just
included.
You
know
the
change
in
the
Charter,
for
it
is
a
totally
procedural.
I
know,
I.
Think.
I
That
it
was
more
or
less
than
missions
fit
and
I
mean
no
I,
don't
know
if
you
wanted
to
adapt
the
Charter
to
follow
with
some
kind
of
like
educational
outreach,
in
terms
of
like
making
sure
that
principals
of
people
that
are
trying
to
work
with
the
foundation
match
the
same
kind
of
things
that
we're
trying
to
set
with
like
diversity
and
inclusivity.
That's
that's
where
I
like
trying
to
solve
the
fit
but
and.
C
C
Yes,
so
I'm
talking
about
two
different
conversations.
My
apologies,
a
conversation
I
had
earlier
today
in
trying
to
check
to
see
what
this
like
education
versus
education
initiatives
vocabulary
and
that's
where
it
was
suggested
to
me
that
we
needed
to
ask
the
board,
because
otherwise
we
would
not
need
to
ask
permission
to
bring
in
no
together
into
the
repo.
B
B
B
I
didn't
even
see
education
in
there
in
any
form
or
fashion,
actually
like
there
was,
and
as
far
as
like
the
inclusivity
a
so.
This
is
another
area
where
we
may
want
to
consider
tweaking
the
charter
of
it,
because
the
only
time
we
really
explicitly
refer
to
it,
as
one
of
our
responsibilities
is
overseeing
the
inclusivity
working
group.
Oh.
C
B
I
feel
marrows
the
scope
a
little
bit,
so
it's
sort
of
I
mean
once
again.
This
is
procedural
legalese.
This
is
not.
You
know
the
reality
of
where
we're
actually
working
good,
but
it
actually
it
implies.
You
know,
from
a
charter
legal
perspective
that
if
it's
not
done
inside
the
inclusivity
working
group
than
it
actually
doesn't
count
as
one
of
our
responsibilities
so.
C
B
C
B
All
right
so
next
steps
on
this,
it
sounds
like
we
need
to
ask
the
board
just
kind
of
get
their
sign
up
on
this,
and
then
once
that's
done.
Is
that
just
simply
a
matter
of
transferring
ownership
of
that
repository
to
the
node
foundation?
And
then
we
PR
tar
with
me,
am
I
missing
anything
in
that?
Is
there
anything
else?
We
also
need
to
discuss
around
this
thing.
There's.
C
F
I
A
good
home
page
site,
yeah.
G
The
only
other
thing
I
know
that,
in
terms
of
repos
coming
outside
repos
coming
in,
for
you
know,
technical
ones
has
been
the
TCS
asked
for
governance
to
be
added,
I,
don't
know
if
it's
already
there,
basically
something
that
says.
You
know.
This
is
what
the
governance
that
applies
to
this
repo
is
as
part
of
the
move.
G
Of
the
other
ones,
it's
it's
been
like
you
know,
they're
basically
been
duplicates
of
the
template
ones
that
are
used
for
the
you
know
the
CTC
and
the
TSC,
which
basically
says
you
know
it's
open
government
governance.
There's
members,
it
thought
that
applies.
You
know
if
this
is
just
going
to
be
handled
as
part
of
the
the
rest
of
the
comp
comm
activities,
maybe
just
a
reference
that
says
you
know
this
project
is
governed
by
the
governance.
That's
defined
over
here
would
make
sense.
B
But
does
raise
an
interesting
question.
Actually
is
really
not
up.
Is
you
know,
is
this
going
to
be
a
working
group
or
a
team
I
think
we
probably
want
to
start
as
a
team,
but
you
know,
may
consider
converting
to
a
working
group
at
some
later
point
time,
which
does
involve
a
lot
more
of
this
kind
of
governance
structure.
Yeah.
F
Thing
to
consider
is
there
is
the
note,
the
other
slack
that
does
have
moderation
stuff
inside
of
it,
and
it's
also
a
kind
of
foundational
part
of
how
similar
the
other
groups
and
people
that
participate
are
able
to
connect
after
the
event.
That's
something
that
we're
also
going
to
have
to
consider.
B
Yeah,
that's
an
interesting
one.
That
actually
might
you
might
need
to
be
a
working
group
for
that
band.
Is
you
know
when
you're
working
group,
that's
how
you
can
get
granted
autonomy
to
moderate
things
as
easy-fit?
Technically
teams
aren't
supposed
to
do
that
really,
I,
don't
we'll
think
on
this
I.
C
Don't
know
I
don't
think
we
have
rules
are
don't
akar
working
group,
maybe
you're
thinking
the
TSC
stuff
or
maybe
that's
more
of
a
like
cultural
thing,
but
I
mean
I
can't
see
that
I
I
know
for
a
fact
that
the
note
together,
the
the
guidelines
for
code
of
conduct
are
stricter.
Much
stricter
than
nodes.
C
So
I
mean
that
still
follows
the
node
code
of
conduct
guidelines
right
which
it
has
to
at
least
be
as
meet
the
same
line
in
the
sand
as
the
node
code
of
conduct.
But
it
is
okay
to
have
a
further,
but
I.
Don't
think
we
define
working
groups
for
the
calm,
calm
that,
to
that
degree
that
they
wouldn't
be
able
to
or
teams
that
they
like
would
not
be
able
to
have
their
own.
G
Whereas
workgroups
you
know
it's
like
formally
said
we,
you
know
delegated
this
responsibility
to
you
guys,
so
you
can
define
your
own,
your
own
code
of
conducts.
You
can
define
your
own
processes.
I.
Think
you
know
on
the
in
the
day-to-day
working
that
really
hasn't
been
much
difference.
It's
just
really
been
in
that
formalization
of
handing
off
the
responsibility.
Yeah.
G
It's
just
sort
of
like
what
will
you
want
a
group
of
people,
other
than
say
the
community
community
to
be
the
ones
who
would
vote
on
I.
Don't
know
that
that
happens
very
often.
But
if
you
had
to
vote
on
something
you
know,
would
you
want
it
to
be
a
smaller
group?
That's
just
related
to
that
or
you
know
you're,
okay,
with
it
defaulting
back
to
that.
The
community
committee
is
the
members
I.
G
B
All
right,
so
this
point:
we
are
about
seven
minutes
over
sorry,
everyone
I
think
it's
too
got
started
late
I
there
anything
else
you
want
to
talk
about
with
this
I'm,
also
going
to
recommend
that
we
just
table
issue
number
33
moderation
shortage
for
and
we
can
talk
about
it.
The
next
thing
is
everyone:
okay,
with
that
kind
of
that
yep,
okay,
I,
believe.