►
From YouTube: Node.js Community Committee Meeting - 2020/03/19
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
I'm,
just
gonna
get
a
good
list
hold
on
so
I
know
I'm
just
getting
that
right.
This
second,
so
I
can
one
more
second
and
I'll
have
a
nice
right.
So
the
recent
things
that
was
mentioned
is
the
open.
Just
foundation
is
looking
for
new
content
for
the
blog,
in
particular
deep
technical
content.
So
if
people
have
any
things
that
would
like
to
add
or
suggest
looking
for
that,
they're
also
looking-
and
this
came
out
of
the
recent
marketing
in
a
medium
committee
meeting
they're-
also
looking
for
developer
profiles.
C
C
There
was,
it
was
mentioned
around
Mac,
OS
and
notarization.
There's
requests
going
out
to
the
projects
to
see
if
it
makes
sense
for
the
foundation
to
manage
certificates
that
we
would
use.
So
you
know
in
our
case,
for
example,
it
would
be
that
the
node.js
binaries
saw
him
potentially
from
a
foundation
certificate
versus
a
note
specific
certificate.
This
has
come
out
of
out
of
work
in
that
you
know
fir
node.
We
had
to
renew
our
Mathematica
with
certificates.
We
got
the
foundation
to
help
and
it
was
like
well.
C
Maybe
it
just
makes
sense
for
them
to
manage
those
completely
in
projects,
not
even
to
have
to
worry
about
them
I'm
for
us
we
have
our
certificates.
So
it's
not
really
an
you
know
an
urgent
thing,
but
if
the
other
projects
do
show
a
strong
interest,
we
may
move
towards.
You
know
single
certificates
that
we
could
use
across
projects
unless
people
have
some
concerns.
With
that,
there's
we're
looking
to
populate
the
code
of
conduct
panel
and
nodejs
as
a
project
can
optionally
provide
a
representative.
C
You
know,
as
an
impact
project
can
optionally
provide
a
representative
I
think
we
should
discussion,
and
the
TSE
meeting
was
that
we
should
probably
reach
out
to
the
moderation
team
to
see
if
there's
anybody
from
there
who
would
like
to
you
know,
participate
it's
not.
It's
not
expected
to
be
a
large
amount
of
work,
because
this
panel
is
is
more
to
handle
escalations.
C
This
looks
to
formalize
a
process
where
we
would
add
what
I'm
calling
collaboration
areas
we'll
see
if
that's
raishin
spaces,
not
sure
if
that'll
be
that
the
final
name,
but
just
like
projects
can
join
the
foundation.
My
concept
is
that
we
could
have
groups
join
the
foundation
to
form
a
collaboration
area
so
that
you
they
can
work
together
on
a
particular
area.
Be
that
security.
C
C
Thinking
on
the
CPC
front,
that's
most
of
what
I
had
on
the
board
front.
There
hasn't
been
a
meeting
I,
don't
think
since
our
last
I
actually
can't
remember-
maybe
maybe
it
has
been
since
our
last
meeting.
The
main
thing
to
kind
of
point
out
is
that,
on
the
question
of
project
directed
funding,
there's
a
number
of
aspects
on
that,
but
on
the
aspect
of
member
foundation
like
foundation,
member
companies
wanting
to
donate
funds
to
a
particular
project,
so,
for
example,
we
had
some
company
and
they
wanted
to
give
extra
money
to
node.
C
We
had
the
board
has
agreed
and
documented
guidance
on
that
front.
It's
such
that
you
know
you
can't
direct
your
your
membership
dues,
but
if
you
want
to
contribute
additional
money
above
those
membership
dues
there
that
guidance
documents
how
you
can
do
that
and
to
what
limit
you
can
do
that
it
is
set
up
so
that
you
know
you
can't
necessarily
decide
to
choose
to
join
at
a
lower
membership
level
and
then
direct
the
rest
of
the
money
to
a
particular
project.
It's
meant
to
encourage
it
to
be.
You
know.
C
You've
joined
the
foundation
at
the
appropriate
level
and
if
you
want
to
contribute,
in
addition,
this
is
the
way
you
can
do
that,
so
that
link
I
can
paste
into
the
chat
here
and
I'll.
Add
it
to
the
minutes.
That's
what
I
hadn't
left
that
joke
doctor.
Anything
else
did.
A
A
Oh
Jase
examples
repository
I
post,
an
update
in
this
earlier
today.
I
have
a
local
local
proof
of
concept,
but
I'm
just
working
to
make
sure
that
it's
gonna
work,
how
I
kind
of
communicated
it
would
before
I
go
ahead
and
create
this
and
I
want
to
be
slow
on,
creating
it
rather
than
fast
on
creating
it
like
I'm,
creating
it
and
having
nothing,
mostly
because
I,
don't
want
people
to
start
tearing
stuff
and
like
not
have
the
structure,
the
seeds,
at
least
at
that
structure
there.
A
A
I
also
hope
to
maybe
have
some.
You
know
some
examples.
Iii
will
be
able
to
create
a
couple,
but
you
know
over
the
next
few
weeks
being
in
quarantine
or
self
quarantine,
but
yeah.
If
once
that
is
up.
If
people
have
examples
like,
if
you're
you
know,
if
you
love
festa
fire
express
or
esta
Phi
or
some
specific
UI
framework
or
something
else,
I
would
be
happy
to
say,
I'm.
A
D
Attorney
this
is
Rachel
nope,
nope,
no
concerns
or
anything
like
that,
but
before
just
kind
of
promoting
this
more
widely.
Is
this
an
opportunity
to
do
some
and
I'm
looking
to
you
for
timing
on
this,
but
either
like
a
blog
post
on
the
collection
or
social?
You
know
social
stuff,
pointing
folks
that
this
is
happening.
C
D
A
E
D
F
A
So
I'm
gonna
I'm
gonna
have
that
in
the
readme
I
will
be
definitely
including
that
and
then
I
am
NOT
gonna
ship
it
with
zero
examples.
I'm
gonna
create
one
or
two
like
simple
commander
app
and
then
like
something
else,
I
don't
know,
maybe
yeah
I,
don't
know.
I
I,
don't
know
how
to
test
a
web
server
like
I've,
never
I'm,
not
written
test
for
like
Express
or
fast
Bible
course,
and
that's
gonna
be
an
interesting
one.
A
That
I
might
not
try
to
bite
off
right
now
but,
like
you
know,
build
something
else
that
can
be
tested,
and
you
know
have
that
listing
example
have
a
few
of
those
just
so
you
can
look
and
you
can
have
what
I'm
kind
of
aiming
at
and,
of
course,
like
I
am
saying.
I
am
what
I'm
aiming
at
and
what
I
want
to
do.
This
is,
of
course,
a
community
committee
initiative
and
I
just
want
to
get
it
up
and
running
into
a
place
that
it's
like
in
the
direction
that
I
communicated.
H
H
A
Cool
with
that
I
think
we
can
move
on
to
the
next
agenda
item
one
second,
just
doing
the
user
management
stuff.
I
really
wish
zoom
made
this
easier
for
webinars.
A
A
A
A
C
C
No,
we
don't
want
to
do
it
in
the
TSC
meeting
this
week
it
seemed
like
there
weren't
any
so
we
actually
took
it
off
the
agenda
and
I
I
had
the
last
action
to
make
sure
that
here,
at
the
the
calm,
calm
side,
we
have
a
discussion
and
and
figure
out,
do
we
still
do.
We
want
to
continue
the
discussion
in
the
github
issue.
A
I
mean
I
personally
raised
my
own
kind
of
thoughts
on
it.
There
I
don't
think
they
should
be
blocking
but
I.
You
know
I'm
pretty
personally
I'm,
you
know
zero
on
it,
but
I
I,
don't
think
they
should
be
blocking.
So
if
there's
no,
that
we
do
again,
we
don't
necessarily
have
consensus,
but
therefore
I'm
sorry.
A
B
Do
we
want
to
just
quickly
go
over
or
like
what
the
pros
and
cons
are
here?
I
mean
I'm
scrolling
through
it
read
through
it
a
little
bit
in
the
past,
but
I
see
your
concerns.
Tierney
like
I,
guess
what
what's
the
what's
the
positive
to
going
to
a
new
org,
and
you
know
why?
Wouldn't
you
know
what
isn't.
C
B
C
A
couple
I
can
I
can
talk
to
those
having
having
been
in
the
discussions
with
the
team
itself.
I
mean
the
eyes
that
I
think
the
core
reason
they're.
The
request
is,
is
four
separate,
org
purses,
you
know
repose
in
the
know,
des
organization
itself.
The
first
one
is
around
some
concern
over
making
these
these
tools
and
things
that
the
package
maintenance
team
is
going
to
be
developing
and
experimenting
with
seem
to
official,
and
you
know,
with
the
the
concern
being
once
this
under
the
no
D
essaouira,
get
kind
of
seems
like
well.
C
This
is
the
the
way
the
the
projects
going
and
it
might
discourage
other
experimentation,
their
husband,
the
you
know,
the
counterpoint
to
that
is,
has
been
raised,
that
you
know
it
may
end
up
being
similar
in
terms
of
official
nasur
non
official
Nassif.
This
repo
is
owned
by
the
project
anyway,
but
it
does
provide
some
separation.
C
The
other
aspect
is,
it
does
provide
some
grouping
in
terms
of
you
know
it.
It
shows
the
sort
of
projects
that
are
being
looked
at
by
an
internal
managed
by
the
the
package,
maintenance
team
versus
the
the
just
a
large
set
that
we
have
already
underneath
the
org
I'm
trying
to
think.
If
there's
any
main
things
that
I've
called
out.
Some
of
the
discussion
in
in
the
issue
along
the
side
is
is
some
of
the
comments
that
have
been
made
have
been
in
all
that
journey
he
can
mention
is
the
the
other
side.
C
Is
that
people
there
seems
to
be
some
sentiment
that
we
just
happen
to
have
had
a
single
org
that
not
necessarily
that
that's
what
we've
planned
or
thought
we
would
always
have
so
adding
a
separate
organization.
May
you
know
it's
not
that
big
a
deal
and
it's
not
in
fact
anything
different
than
we
may
may
have
done.
Just
it's
actually,
the
first
time
we're
doing
it.
C
B
See
some
mention
of
open
Jas.
One
thought
that
comes
to
mind
is-
and
you
know,
if
we've
got
an
agenda
that
we
want
to
get
to
you.
I,
don't
want
to.
You
know
like
shut
too
much
on
this
at
the
moment,
but
could
this
be
a
collaboration
space
and
then
you
know
kind
of
still
fall
under
some
obvious
governance
and
it's.
C
Potential
there's
two
two
concerns
I'd
have
with
that.
Sorry
again
is
one.
The
open,
GS
foundation
doesn't
have
it's
not
quite
as
ramped
up
on
the
moderation
side
of
things,
which
is
one
of
the
sort
of
goals
that
the
team
also
had
us
to
like,
make
it
clear
how
these
product,
how
these
repos
would
be
moderated
and
we're
not
quite
as
far
along
on
the
Oakland
GS
side.
In
terms
of
that
mm-hmm
and
the
other
thing
is,
there
is
synergy
with
the
node
project,
specifically
here
in
terms
of
the
well
actually,
no
I
was
sorry.
C
B
A
A
Remember
like
participant
in
the
community
and
helping
kind
of
create
spaces
that
are
spaces
and
understanding
in
context
that
is
shared
across
the
community
having
an
avenue
from
the
community
in
in
terms
of
like
projects
that
have
you
know
that
needs
certain
things
are
looking
for.
Certain
guidance.
Node
has
typically
been
very
disconnected
from
that,
and
not
necessarily
they
like
community
committee
sense
of
community,
but
more
than
the
ecosystem
sense
of
projects
have
things
need
from
node.
I.
A
C
Yeah
and
all
my
opinion
is
like
we
we're
still
figuring
out
what
will
make
sense
in
the
different
places
so
I'm
in
no
rush
to
try
and
move
from
one
to
the
other,
because,
because
like
there
is
synergy
with
the
node
project
in
many
cases,
and
so
it's
not
that
everything
would
make
more
sense
at
the
open,
J's
Foundation.
So
what.
B
Is
it
the
case?
That's
the
the
what's
being
proposed
here
that
the
package
maintenance
team
itself
and
the
work
that
it's
doing
would
remain
in
the
note
Jas
org
in
terms
of
like
as
a
team,
whereas
the
code
and
the
packages
and
the
the
tooling
that
may
be
spun
out
of
the
work
would
exist
in
this
other
repo.
That.
H
B
C
C
Be
relatively
straightforward
changes
to
our
governance,
which
would
just
say
like
in
the
github
organ
organization
management.
We
may
just
need
to
mention
multiple
organizations
and
in
fact
we
already
have
a
couple
like
we
do
have
a
private
or
managing
security,
vulnerabilities
and
stuff.
So
actually
it
probably
should
already
list
a
couple.
Mm-Hmm.
A
Don't
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
seem
like
any
of
them
are
necessary,
like
Watchers,
so
like
that,
the
three
don't
worry
Watchers,
which
is
like
people
who
watch
the
org
there.
We
already
have
hundreds
of
read
book
repositories,
creating
more
isn't
going
to
be
a
problem
like
if
people
are
already
concerned
about
that,
it's
something
that
they
would
have
voiced
and
I,
don't
necessary.
Think
that's
problematic
on
the
scope
of
the
or
like
scope
of
the
org
and
what
they're
doing
it's
already
scoped
to
what
we're
doing
like
I
I.
A
As
someone
who
publishes
way
too
many
things,
I
very
much
feel
that
need
for
purity
I.
Also,
in
this
case,
don't
necessarily
think
it
matters
that
much
like
it's
again,
not
a
significant
enough
reason
to
me
to
me.
Like
that's,
you
know
my
perspective,
to
to
add
the
increased
overhead
for
moderation
and
for
the
TOC
and
for
comm
to
have
a
different
work.
Now,
it's
totally
fine.
If
people
disagree
with
me
and
I'm,
not
gonna
block
on
those
but
I,
you
know
I
personally,
disagree
that
this
is
a
necessary
thing
that
needs
a
different
work.
A
Now,
the
one
one
thing
that
Michael
brought
up
that
I
I
do
very
much
very
painfully
respect
is
the
organization
ownership
and
like
creating
repos
in
a
less
structured
way
and
being
able
to
manage
those
and
manage
like
bots
in
them.
I've
tried
many
time
dad
bots
to
the
Oregon
had
been
told
no
many
times
because
of
like
you
know,
access
to
node,
core
and
stuff.
A
So
I,
you
know
understand
that
that
one-
and
you
can
sympathize
with
that
so
yeah-
that's
just
those
are
the
points
that
were
brought
up
and
the
ones
I
addressed
the
NDSU,
the
the
or
the
Oregon
or
ship
one
I,
don't
think
was
or
at
least
I.
Don't
me,
I
didn't
see
it
in
my
response
there,
but
yeah
I
I
understand
that
one.
C
Yeah
that
one
may
I'm
not
I
wonder
if
we
actually
got
that
in
there
that
that
came
up-
and
you
know,
we've
had
several
discussions
in
the
package.
Maintenance
meeting
and
I
think
that
one
came
out,
maybe
just
in
the
last
meeting
where
people
were
like
well,
you
know
we
might
actually
even
want
to
ask
for
some
delegated.
You
know
authority
to
manage.
C
What's
in
there
versus
having
to
follow
the
regular
process,
yeah
I
mean
I
I'm
I've,
I've
I've
had
the
discussions
and
it's
kind
of
like
you
know
the
I
think
it
could
work
either
way.
But
you
know
a
number
of
the
team
belief
I
think
relatively
strongly
that
it's
worthwhile
to
try
this
out
and
I.
Think
in
that
context,
I
I
think
it's
a
good
idea.
C
C
A
A
72,
no
more
more
hours,
72
plus
three
for
math
hours
96.
So
you
know,
if
that's
not
people
took
it
in
him.
I
thank
Allah.
He
will
presume
resolved
okay,
so
there
there
is
an
agenda
item
that
is
not
on
this,
but
that
I
I
did
update
immediately
prior
to
the
meeting.
I
went
through
and
created.
So
in
the
admin
repo.
There
is
the
the
social
social
discussion
for
notice
social
media
accounts.
This
is
issue
454
in
in
it,
I
will
paste
the
link
and
zoom
chat.
A
Yep,
so
I
went
through
and
created.
The
electron
team
has
run
into
some
barriers
with
the
API
access
stuff,
so
I've
not
been
able
to
chase
that
down
as
effectively
as
I
hoped
so,
while
I'm
still
working
with
them,
I
went
through
and
created
the
the
POC
on
my
own
get
up
repo
and
Twitter
account.
It
took
me
five
minutes,
so
it's
very
straightforward
and
relatively
good
DX
I
put
all
the
links
there,
so
the
repos
there
the
commit
is
there,
the
action
run
is
there
and
then
the
tweet
itself
is
there?
A
So
you
know
if
I
that
should
theoretically
be
unblocked
from
you
know,
please
give
us
a
POC
and
we
can
maybe
perhaps
continue
that
discussion.
Michael
I
know
you
you've
kind
of
been
relatively
active
in
this
discussion.
I'd
love
to
get
your
thoughts
on
this
and,
of
course,
other
people's
as
well.
Yeah.
A
C
C
A
Yeah,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I
got
that
in
since
I
know.
That's
something
that
we've
discussed
in
the
past
and
I'm
just
updating
the
agenda,
real,
quick
to
make
sure
we
have
that
cool.
A
A
B
F
A
That's
a
good
question:
I
mean
I,
guess
the
23rd,
which
is
in
a
few
days
so
I
believe
that's
the
same.
Monday
I
could
be
wrong.
I
don't
like
calendar
open
but
yeah
the
23rd
like
actually
yeah.
That's
that's
Monday
right,
yeah,
yes,
okay,
so
yeah
I
highly
doubt
there
are
going
to
be
issues,
but
unless
someone
raises
one
during
that
time,
like
there's
no
need
to
run
a
vote
because
there's
no
no
one
to
vote
for.
So
you
know
if
there
is
no
major
objections
by
then
I
will.
I
will
update
that
that.
A
B
And
I'll
just
say
to
you
as
a
reminder
that
you
know
any
of
us
can
get
involved
in
the
cross
project
council
work
as
an
observer
or
as
an
a
regular
member.
We
follow
the
same
sort
of
consensus
seeking
model
and
you
know
I
encourage
folks
to
get
involved,
and
you
know
and
that's
a
great
way.
If
anybody
wants
to
you
know,
run
out
of
later
dates,
then
they
can
try
it
out
and
see.
You
know
the
work
and.
B
A
Yeah
I
have
been
participating
as
a
regular
member
for
quite
a
while
I
attend
the
meetings
as
often
as
I
can,
and
you
know,
my
voice
has
generally
been
heard.
My
somewhat
complaining
voice
has
generally
been
heard,
uh-huh,
so
yeah,
you
know
I
highly
recommend
if
you
are
a
contributor
to
node
in
any
way
when
you're
interested
in
CBC.
Please
please
turn
up.
There's
a
regular
member
I.
Think
Hong
Kong
of
the
projects
in
node
has
the
largest
representation
in
the
regular
membership.
So
thank
you
all
for
coming
cool
any
thoughts
comments.
I
I
A
A
D
A
D
I
D
Got
some
children
in
the
background,
so
yeah
yeah
welcome
to
the
new
normal.
So
so
we
are
so.
The
the
node
everywhere
newsletter,
with
the
merge
to
the
open
Jas
foundation,
were
exploring
new
layer
options
more
broadly,
so
we
haven't
put
anything
out
since
December.
So
there's
nothing,
there's
nothing
actively
going
on
right
now
with
that
specific
newsletter.
Okay.
A
D
Review
I
should
probably
that
you'll
probably
come
off.
If
people
want
to
it's,
not
even
an
open,
Jas
newsletter,
we
are
sending
out
pertinent
information
around
like
foundation
stuff,
but
it's
not
it's
not
a
newsletter
like
we're
again
we're
very
much
investigating
what
you
know
how
we,
how
we
engage
via
email,
so
I
say
if
that's
something
that
needs
to
come
off:
I'm
100%.
Okay,
with
that
yeah.
A
A
So
does
seller
or
the
third
solo
do
one
of
you
all
want
to
bring
this
back
to
that
issue
and
say:
hey
this,
you
know
further
comic-con
meeting.
This
has
been
temporarily
like
the
newsletter,
like
I'm,
really
glad
that
we
have
that
the
newsletter
is
like
not.
The
current
newsletter
is
not
running,
and
this
that
might
change
what
we
want
to
do
so
I.
G
A
F
A
E
E
A
A
A
A
F
G
F
F
With
with
our
CI
complexity,
so
so
the
the
bigger
problem
we're
facing
is
that,
obviously
we
don't
see
the
Settings
tab
and
the
idea
of
floating
around
you
know
Authority
tokens.
So
so
we
just
don't
know
you
know.
The
current
team
doesn't
really
have
much
insight
on
how
to
go
about
the
necessary
change.
That
obviously
comes
with
a
little
bit
more
administrative
privilege
and
axis
so
so
we
will
have
a
makeup
hackathon,
because
the
last
one
last
weekend
was
a
little
bit
unorganized
with
time
shifts
to
be
able
to.
F
A
E
A
Just
say,
I
think
one
of
the
things
you're
gonna
have
to
ask
for
and
I
don't
know.
If
we
went
through
I,
don't
know
what
the
process
we
did
was
to
go
through
getting
GCB
in
here
and
apparently
we're
just
adding
we're
just
adding
and
get
up
apps
now
I
didn't
realize
that
we
were
able
to
do
that.
That
changes
a
lot
of
things,
there's
several
in
there
that
I,
don't
think
were
previously
like
discussed.
A
So
there's
a
to
do
there
of
what
steps
is
for
getting
get
a
Babson
slope,
but
there
is
a
pending
github
app
requests
for
net
liffe
I
GCB
is
in
there.
Hacking
D
is
in
there,
which
I
didn't
realize
was
one
that
we
installed
but
yeah
this
you
know
the
the
barrier
that
you're
gonna
face
is
to
get
a
bath
and
getting
approval
for
that.
A
A
And
everything
versus
my
mission,
I
guess
I'm
shocked
that
we
got
GCB
and
how
can
be
in
there
like
I,
first
of
all,
I
don't
didn't
know
he
had
hack
and
be
in
there,
but
yeah
I'm
good.
We
need
to
document
the
process
for
this
because
I
don't
think
either
those
went
through
like
an
approval
process.
They.
A
Gcb
I'm
guessing
so
I
can,
if
we
refine
limiting
things
that
changes
a
lot
and
I
think
we
should
define
that,
because
GCB
is
only
available
under
this
tab,
so
yeah,
if
that,
if
we're
allowed
to
do
that,
that
changes
a
lot
of
how
I
would
approach
no
yeah
I
think
this
is
something
we
should
do.
You
know
if
there's
a
document
for
this
Michael
I,
don't.
E
That
was
actually
miles
just
configuring,
everything
so
that
it
somehow
works
I
would
suggest
eye
contact
miles
in
the
next
website
redesign
meeting
we
discussed
about
their
what
we
want
to
do
next.
If
you
want
to
move
to
some
another
provider,
we
discussed
that
and
then
open
the
issue
in
the
admin
repo
and
then
follow
up
with
that,
because
right
now
it's
everything
is
a
bit
unclear.
E
C
F
E
F
Know
get
the
everybody's
okay,
that
this
is
where
we
want
to
go,
because
the
problem
with
the
website
redesign
effort
right
now
is
that
a
lot
of
threads
were
opened
and
then
there
was
a
big
gap
of
you
know.
Oh
people
just
coming
in
and
doing
one
or
two
things,
and
then
you
know
that
there
was
really
a
gap
and
then,
when
he
started
to
regroup,
we
were
really
just
mostly
new
people
showing
up
and
saying
you
know
this
needs
to.
You
know
we're
excited.
F
A
Yeah,
and
if
you
you
don't
have
to
turn
them
both
like
turn
one
on
and
one
off,
if
just
you
know
as
soon
as
it's
reasonable
turned
it
like.
Remove
the
GC
GC
b1
I,
keep,
let
me
say,
GCP
yeah
keep
you
know
turn
that
off
as
soon
as
you're
done
with
it.
Basically
and
like
have
that
be
removed.
I
you
know,
since
I
am
unfortunately
in
comp
from
the
only
person
with
ownership.
A
As
you
know,
a
member
I
I
will
be
happy
if
you
want
to
have
that
as
part
of
your
your
trigger
for,
like
you
know,
once
we're
done,
tyranny
can
go
turn
it
off
I'm
happy
to
do
that
and
take
that
responsibility
since
Tom,
since
the
web
site
except
fall
falls
under
compound.
Oh
yeah,
you
know
that's
I'm
trying
to
do
that.
If
that's
helpful
so.