►
From YouTube: Community Committee Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
We
have
put
a
few
a
lot
of
people
on
the
call
we
don't
have
consensus
from
comicon
members.
Even
with
this
it's
destroyed
I
believe
we
paid
two
more
to
be
over
50%,
so
we
can't
make
decisions,
but
we
can
take
action
items
and
kind
of
continue
to
push
things
forward
with
that
I
think
we
can
get
started
with
strategic
initiative
update.
B
Logo
with
user
feedback,
so
user
feedback
is
aligning
the
user
feedback
team
is
aligning
with
the
current
release
that
is
coming
up
at
the
end
of
April
and
scheduling
some
user
feedback
sessions.
We've
had
folks
in
info
I
volunteered
my
made
up
different
in
San
Francisco,
where
we'll
have
James
Snell
coming
to
join
us
to
sort
of
anchor
a
bit
of
content
and
an
update
er
around
the
version.
B
12
current
release
that'll
be
coming
and
we're
exploring
taking
that
up
to
Portland
as
well,
then
open
source
is
has
volunteered
to
have
the
node
V
DX
Meetup
host
a
user
feedback
session
as
well
and
awkward
Missouri
is
lining
up
Toronto,
je
s
as
another
partner
in
that
so
in-person
data
gathering
and
in
in
line
with
with
mateus.
This
comes
is
drawn
from
the
the
LTS
release
where
Mattie
oculina.
A
C
A
But
yeah
so
I
will
just
go
over
the
log
real,
quick,
the
moderation
team
log.
Let
me
scroll
up
to
the
point
that
I
last
March
as
logged,
okay,
cool,
so
we've
gotten,
and
if
the
email
report
or
an
empty
email
I'm,
not
a
report
to
report
at
no
js'
that
org,
we
received
an
email
about
activities
from
a
suspended
collaborator
and
responded
to
it
deleted.
A
spam
comment
on
issue
two:
five:
three:
four:
eight
EndNote
core
blocked
the
user.
That
was
posting
spam.
A
That's
moderation
issue
two,
six,
two
converts
by
email
with
the
band
user
regarding
the
thera-band
that
was,
you
know
the
most
work
we've
done
in
the
past
couple
weeks,
focusing
on
that
and
then
closed
a
spam
spam
issue
it
didn't
appear
or
closed.
The
spam
reported
an
issue
that
was
reported
as
spam.
That
didn't
seem
to
be
what
it
should
be
so
yeah.
A
A
A
A
You
know
what
the
framework
or
tooling
we're
gonna
use
and
then
are
currently
working
on.
Like
the
first
step
of
that
we
are
working
with
an
individual
from
Google
who's.
You
know
heavily
involved
in
the
CSS
open
standards
to
actually
build
that
a
design
for
it,
I'm
feelin.
That
I
cannot
remember
their
name
right
now,
but
yeah
we're
working
with
them.
To
do
that.
So
that's
exciting,
and
this
is
you
know,
we're
gonna
be
trying
to
have
this
done.
I
b12
I
believe
it's
the
12th
or
the
16th
dates
are
hard.
A
A
Website,
prototype
is
I,
believe,
be
repo.
Yes,
indeed,
it
is
so
it's
github.com
/,
nodejs,
/
website,
/
prototype,
and
so
that
has
a
Gatsby.
You
know
things
that
website
set
up.
I
do
suggest
following
the
instructions
it
does
require.
You
are
in
the
present
and
it's
just
a
small
change
that
needs
to
be
made.
I
believe
to
make
it
someone
works
with
NPM,
but
yeah
follow
the
instructions.
A
I
know
y'all
can
probably
end
up
getting
that
set
up.
Please
contribute,
if
you
want
to
you
know,
if
you
have
time,
it'd
be
awesome
to
get
your
contributions
in
to
help
get
this
launched.
A
E
Thank
you
so
much
so
one
thing
is:
we
saw
a
lot
of
people
expressing
interest
in
helping
with
the
collaborative
CIMMYT,
but
we
definitely
saw
a
drop-off
in
people
starting
to
participate,
so
we
would
absolutely
adore
more
people
coming
and
being
helpers
and
organizing
the
collaborative
summit
and
participating
in
the
meetings.
There
is
an
issue
that
you
can
comment
on
and
you
can
always
email
me
lately
at
no
js',
org
and
I
can
add
you
to
the
calendar
invitation
where.
E
Biggest
win
for
us
this
week
was
that
we
finally
got
a
venue
in
the
budget.
It's
amazing!
Yes,
we're
so
excited
about
it.
It
actually
includes
a
lot
of
things
like
food,
etc.
So
we're
we're
really
really
really
excited
we're.
Getting
that
locked
down.
Everybody
has
confirmed
its
good
to
go.
It's
the
courtyard
Berlin
City
Center,
so
it's
right
in
the
middle
of
the
city.
Everything
will
be
great
there.
We
have
one
big
room
with
100
people
that
can
fit
100
people,
and
then
we
have
three
breakout
rooms
as
well.
E
So
that's
great
Jori
and
me
are
working
on
proposals
and
so
that
people
can
start
submitting
see
if
peace,
one
thing
I
wanted
to
bring
up
was
travel
fund
usage.
So
the
last
time
we
did
this,
and
this
was
for
the
October
collaborator
summit.
We,
you
know,
was
it
Joey
reached
out
and
wanted
to
make
sure
that
everything
was
good.
What
we
did
was
you
know
kind
of
take
a
pull
of
hey
who's,
gonna
be
using
this.
We
didn't
do
that
for
jazz
confit,
you
probably
because
it
was
so
early
in
the
year.
F
E
Well,
anyways:
what
do
you
guys
want
to
do
about
the
travel
fund?
Because
we
were
thinking
hey,
let's
actually
start
telling
people
to
start
submitting
PRS
and
getting
a
request
for
the
travel
fund.
Just
so
we
start
getting
a
better
idea.
Also,
tickets
are
obviously
expensive,
so
the
quicker
people
booked,
the
cheaper,
the
tickets
are
yeah.
G
A
G
A
D
We've
gone
back
and
forth
on
ways
we
might
ensure
attendance
of
the
people
who
were
submitting
proposals
and
I.
Suppose
this
question
about
how
to
let
people
know
that
we're
accepting
see,
if
might
be,
related,
how
we
do
that.
So
part
of
the
reservations
about
how
we're
gonna
accept.
Cf
fees
was
because
sometimes
people
submit
see
a
piece
of
not
enough
people
in
the
working
group
or
the
initiative
would
be
there.
D
So
the
meeting
would
I
get
to
lose
some
of
its
value,
so
we
considered,
while
reaching
out
to
the
working
groups
and
then
like
organizing,
like
collaborative
submitting
a
CFP
I,
was
opposed
to
one
member
submitting
it
on
behalf
of
the
working
group
without
people
really
knowing
if
they're
all
gonna
make
it.
So
also
we
thought
about
like
charging
for
tickets,
but
like
a
nominal
amount
that
would
be
given
back
later,
except
that
in
the
individual
memberships
meanings
that
I
joined
a
couple
months
ago.
A
G
G
But
like
I
yeah,
it
kind
of
seems
like
if
we
have
enough
breakouts
as
long
as
we
don't
like
the
lot.
The
thing
you
want
to
avoid
is
bump.
You
know
not
having
a
breakout
for
a
group
that
could
have
met
and
they're
not
having
it
used.
If,
if
we,
if
that
doesn't
happen,
then
if
one
of
them
doesn't
happen,
but
all
the
other
ones
that
would
have
happened
happen
anyway,
I
don't
see
that
it
made
a
difference
right
well,.
E
E
So
he
had
to
do
a
lot
of
wrangling,
the
day
of
and
just
oh
god
fire.
What
are
we
gonna
do?
Okay
now?
What
do
we
do
to
repurpose
this
and
it
was?
It
was
kind
of
a
mess,
but
the
people
who
actually
did
confirm
I
forgot
my
name-
maybe
you
remember,
but
he
some
of
the
working
groups
were
very
organized
and
it
went
really
well
and
it
was
the
most
productive.
E
Another
thing
we
brought
up
that
we
haven't
brought
up
in
a
while,
as
we've
been
doing,
the
organization
for
the
cops'll
in
it,
but
like
we
were
thinking,
probably
just
people
who
might
have
topics
around
the
merger,
maybe
just
submit
it
as
a
session.
We're
thinking
about.
Do
we
need
like
one
room,
fully
dedicated
and
it
seemed
like
that
would
be
overkill.
A
A
A
I
mean
trouble
fund
you're,
paying
out
of
your
pockets,
though
so
yes,
like
that,
you
get
refunded
it's
not
to
like
give
the
money.
It's
like
to
it's
an
event
organization
thing
of
like
I,
am
asserting
that
I'm
gonna
be
here
and
I
am
willing
to
put
ten
dollars
down
to
say
I'm
there,
because
if
you
have
a
free
event,
it
generally
ends
up
being
50%
drop
off
compared
to
like
10
to
20.
If
you
have
like
a
$10
charge,
okay,
so
that's
where
that
goes
is
like
you
can
plan
better
base.
A
And
Tracy
I
would
I
would
just
go
there,
a
path
of
like
yes,
no
like
and
ask
for
yes/no
responses
or
+1
-1
responses
unless
they
have
an
issue
with
the
concept
or
like
there's
some
issue,
that's
outside
of,
like
yes,
I
think
we
should
do
this
or
no
I
shouldn't
just
so.
We
can
kind
of
reduce
the
noise.
E
E
Guess
I,
actually,
one
more
thing.
Sorry
I
think
this
kind
of
goes
with
the
JSF
folks.
They've
been
working
with
jory
of
cornice
or
JSF
on
with
a
collaborator
summit,
and
one
of
the
things
we're
gonna
do
is
we're
gonna
do
like
a
introduction
to,
and
maybe
Menil
you
can
explain
this
but
kind
of
like
the
whole
idea
of
like
hey.
This
is
the
first
joint
summit,
so
we're
gonna
kind
of
like
get
Pete.
You
know,
how'd,
you
get
to
know
the
JSF
people.
E
A
D
All
Cynthia's
quick
thing
we
would
do.
We
were
thinking
about
doing
a
training
session
so
like
a
webinar
or
it's
like
how
to
run
connected
meetings
like
one
hour
hour
for
people
who
submit
CFP.
So
when
you
submitted
see
if
you're
accepted
implicit
understanding
is
that
you
will
attend
out,
so
you
can
run
a
tight
ship.
A
H
Sure
so
we've
been
talking
about
this,
the
last
couple
of
meetings.
We
not
much
of
an
update,
just
a
progress
report
really
I've
been
working
with
Michael
and
his
team
to
get
a
benchmarking
blog
up.
The
plan
will
be
to
get
it
up
either
it'll
probably
be
early
next
week,
because
what
we
would
like
to
do
is
put
up
a
blog
sort
of
introducing
the
series
first
before
we
just
dive
right
in,
but
yeah
we've
kicked
it
off.
H
I've
got
a
couple
of
emails
out
to
some
of
the
folks
who
have
been
recommended
to
me
to
sort
of
lead
content
on
some
of
these
different
updates
and
yeah.
We're
just
we're
just
working
working
through
that
and
trying
to
get
as
many
as
possible
so
that
we
can
kind
of
front-loaded,
plan
and
time
out
when
the
post
will
go
live
at
things
like
that.
H
G
G
H
H
A
A
F
A
To
build
out
surveys
for
previous
membership
and
you
know
start
getting
feedback
on
new
membership.
Dan
commented
a
few
days
ago
that
he's
reading
it
to
the
calm,
calm
agenda,
to
check
whether
the
system
priority
and
he
noted
they
use.
Your
feedback,
will
not
be
able
to
prioritize
this
for
the
next
two
months.
G
A
A
So
it
does
seem
like
these
specific
things,
aren't
necessarily
going
to
be
able
to
be
impactful
in
the
next
two
months,
especially
if
I
can't
help
with
it.
But
I
do
think
that
me
still
have
the
opportunity
once
it
shifts
to
go
down
the
path.
Okay,
we
have
these
this
initial
set
of
membership.
You
know
with
the
plan
that
we're
already
working
toward
this
initial
set
of
membership.
We
have
the
previous
set
of
membership.
We
still
have
access
to
that.
A
Somehow
I
hope,
like
I,
hope
that
just
won't
go
into
the
boy,
at
least
the
individuals,
and
then
we
can
kind
of
segment
the
responses
and
see
which
perform
better
and
also
understand
better.
You
know
the
benefits
and
drawbacks
to
each
approach
and
try
to
kind
of
find
the
best
path
forward
from
there
does
that
seem
to
make
sense
to
others.
I
think.
G
Kind
of
what
you're
saying
is
a
line
of
what
I
want
option
I
was
thinking
is
that
we
could
recast
the
survey
in
terms
of
we've
just
launched
this
new
program.
You
know,
give
us
your
feedback
on
it
initially.
This
was
like.
Well,
if
you
get
feedback
in
advanced,
it
has
input,
that'd
be
great,
but
you
know
timing
whatever.
So
the
next
logical
point
might
be
hey.
This
just
launched.
Here's
a
survey
that
says
tell
us
which
ones
of
these
you
like
what
you
don't
like.
F
A
And
I
mean
a
lot
of
these.
A
lot
of
these
questions
are
like
what
is
your
current
happiness
and
perceived
value:
question
mark
of
individual
membership
on
the
individual
membership,
so
very
much
like
yeah,
that's
a
generic
thing
that
will
be
valuable.
Then
once
we've
shipped
it
and
you
know
for
people
who
have
you
know
if
you
want
to
go
down
the
route
of
it,
Net
Promoter,
Score
gotta,
keep
it
I
know
these
things
go
down
the
route
of.
A
Okay,
the
route
of
Net
Promoter
Score.
Now
you
have
people
who
are
scoring
very
lowly
so
like
blow
for
or
from
seven
root.
Five
to
seven,
we
could
definitely
kind
of
mark
those
people
for
additional
outreach
to
engage
with
them
more
and
see
like
okay,
but
what's
broken,
you're
like
what's
not
working
for
you
and
address
if
it
is
actually
a
problem
with
the
program
or
address
if
it
is
a
program
problem
with,
you
know
an
individual
problem
rather
than
something
that
we
can
help
so
yeah
I
I
personally,
think
that's
a
better
approach.
A
B
Don't
think
and
I
don't
think
we
need
a
decision
either.
We
just
wanted
to
bring
it
back
is
awareness
you
know
mostly
in
in
you
know
letting
folks
know
that
that
we
aren't
gonna
get
to
it
and
you
know
and
usable
time
timeframe
and
then
some
nice
to
have
ill.
If,
if
there
is
closure
there
great,
if
there's
not
closer
there,
well,
we
aren't
gonna
be
able
to
I
think
anyway.
A
B
Adam
and
Tracy,
you
know
taking
this
to
the
board
and
Chrissie
Hynde,
and
you
know
we're
kind
of
waiting
for
next
steps
from
from
Tracy
in
sort
of
aligning
with
the
needs
of
the
board,
and
you
know,
there's
there's
really
nothing
to
do
here
right
now
until
until
you
know,
Tracy
points
us
in
the
direction
that
the
board
wants
to
take.
We've
delivered
our
recommendation
and
okay
just
waiting
for.
A
A
I
would
personally
like
to
do
and
I'm
willing
to
just
sit
here
and
do
the
work
once
we're
done
is
make
some
a
little
bit
better
labeling
for
issues
just
so
like
in
that
context,
like
cool,
we
know,
we
know
that
this
is
delayed
by
the
board,
but
that
we're
waiting
on
not
delay
I
would
phrase
it
as
waiting.
You.
G
A
A
A
Should
conquer
yes,
this
is
you
know
a
lot
broader
discussion
about
the
difference
between
the
nerdiest
foundation
website
and
dean,
DOJ's
website
and
I.
This
didn't
get
discussed.
I
thought
this
got
discussed
in
which
they
redesigned
a
couple
meetings
in
a
row,
but
we
do
I
guess
need
to
discuss
it
in
the
compound
for
me
I
all.
Let
all
that
other
people
talk
person
about
a
lot.
Does
anyone
have
thoughts
run
the
the
specific
question
which
is
should
come
on
video
J's
foundation,
website,
I,
guess.
G
A
So
personally,
I
agree
that
I
think
that's
what
we
discussed
in
the
website.
We
are
the
website.
Redesign
meetings
was
that
like,
if
there
it's
not
even
I
mean
it'll,
be
I,
think
temporarily
might
be
named,
the
node
foundation
or
nodejs
foundation
or
I
hope
not
permanently,
but
you
know
that
might
be
the
working
name
for.
G
A
A
You
know
there's
some
of
the
some
of
the
content
like
just
embedding
it
in
certain
ways,
and
then
you
know,
there's
a
few
other
things:
I,
don't
work
off
the
top
my
head,
what
they
were,
but
they
were.
You
know
various
elements
of
the
website
that
are
like
very
node,
specific
I'm,
probably
something
that
the
community
should
be
maintaining
just
so
it
is
maintained
in
the
long
term
and
you
know
accurate
in
long
term,
so
yeah,
that's,
that's
kind
of
where
that
is
I.
Think
those
elements
are
useful
for
us
to
help
maintain
her
own.
A
B
Yeah
III
think
that
that's
really
the
key
point
is
you
know,
we're
gonna
be
a
blocker
that
air
you
know
be
nicer.
We
really
were
able
to
to
support
that,
and
you
know
I,
don't
just
being
able
to
reliably
do
that
today
and
we're
you
know,
exploring
spending
this
scope
significantly
and
incorporating
many
projects
with
the
the
broader
foundation
mission.
B
Yeah
we're
working
towards-
and
you
know,
I
also
want
to
call
out
that
that
the
reason
why
that
was
created
in
the
first
place
was
to
unblock
the
foundation
team
from
being
able
to
deliver
their
responsibilities.
To
you
know
the
foundation
and
and
programs
they're
running,
but
I
would
love
it.
If
you
both
Foundation
folks
and
the
website
redesign
folks,
you
know
it
would
just
you
know,
spend
a
little
bit
of
time
sharing
some
thoughts
on
Platt
I.
I
G
Also
add
that
I
think
you
know
we
were
on
a
we're
already
collaborating
more
closely
with
some
of
the
foundation
staff
and
are
on
a
good
path
on
that
direction.
So
I
think
you
know
the
the
collaboration
that
Dan
mentioned.
I
think
will
just
happen
organically
now
and-
and
so
you
know,
I'm
not
we're
not
too
worried
about
them
being
two
separate
entities
and
being
able
to
align
ourselves
yeah.
A
And
I
mean
like
given
the
context
of
a
merged
foundation.
The
contents:
do
you
think
in
it
me
to
overlap
as
much
like
there.
There
might
be
some
like
high-level
things,
but
there
it's
not
just
focused
on
node,
anymore
and
I
hope,
I
trust
the
foundation
he
could
not
make
it
focused
on
node
and
I
would
hope.
It
wouldn't
end
up
focused
on
as
a
foundation
website.
That
is
a
broader
foundation
rather
than
just
focused
on
than
one
focus
on
it.
G
Yeah,
there
certainly
needs
to
be
a
path
that
the
project's
influence,
the
content.
The
comment
like
there's
bound
to
be
content
on
the
foundation
when
it,
you
know
the
very
least,
is
going
to
be
here.
The
members
here.
The
projects
in
the
description
so
there's
definitely
got
to
be
a
path
for
the
projects
influencing
that
I.
Think.
D
The
source
of
this
was
that
some
of
the
information
on
the
foundation
website
not
know
just
start
ordering
the
foundation
website.
Specifically,
that's
why
this
is
initially
brought
out
that
we
needed
the
foundation
side
of
it
up
to
date
with
what
was
happening
within,
say,
the
node.js
repo
or
the
project
itself.
G
A
Don't
think
we
have
anything
else
on
the
agenda
was
so
yeah
I
guess
the
the
other
I
believe
we
talked
about
the
labels,
but
that's
something
a
hook
go
ahead
and
try
to
do
a
little.