►
From YouTube: Node.js Community Committee - 2020-04-30
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
We
are
live
thanks.
Everyone
for
joining
us
for
another
community
committee
meeting.
This
is
for
April
30th
2020,
let's
get
started.
Do
we
have
any
initiative
updates?
Oh
I,
guess
a
quick
thing
before
that,
let's
make
sure
to
add
yourself
I'm
trying
to
get
back
the
issue
I'll
make
sure
to
add
yourself
to
the
dock.
If
you
are
present.
A
Thank
you,
I
realized
I
have
github
in
like
the
desktop
PWA
thing
and
I'm
trying
to
do
a
bunch
of
different
links
which
doesn't
really
work
well,
as
it
just
thought
BWA.
So
it's
I'm
just
switching
back
to
not
just
it
does
not
work
good
for
that
use
case.
Ok,
cool!
Thank
you
yeah!
So
if
you
could
I
hate
the
unity,
you
can't
click
links.
D
Well,
we
migrated
to
open
yes
like
channel.
Now
we
have
node.js
mentorship
team,
nodejs,
mentorship
and
mentorship
examples
as
slack
channels.
Two
of
them
are
private
for
the
private
situation
and
then
OJ's
mentorships
public,
and
we
already
made
an
ultimate,
the
previous,
no
Jazz's
lack
channel
mentorship
to
ever
and
evolve
it
and
attain
these
ever
I
should
migrate
to
of
India
Asus.
Also,
oh.
E
Examples
being
a
good
first
initiative
for
the
mentorship
team
to
find
someone
for
so
after
after
the
mentorship
team
does
her
own
I,
guess
dogfooding
and
we
try
and
have
we
find
someone
appropriate
for
the
mentorship
team
on
board
them
and
see
how
that
whole
process
goes.
Examples
will
be
the
next
initiative,
I.
A
A
I've
worked
on,
you
know
giving
some
feedback
yet
Chile
war
and
and
Jill
gave
me
I
restructured
things
slightly
to
have
more
of
like
guardrails
in
it
and
that
merged
in
the
Matteo
also
helped
with
help
basically
tweaking
the
CI,
so
it'll
be
more
per
project
rather
than
everything
and
just
running
whatever
changed
or
per
example.
So
hopefully
it's
a
you
know
a
little
bit
more
approachable,
workflow
and
then,
before
of
like
go,
create
the
new
top-level
category
and
stuff.
A
A
C
So
what
have
we
been
working
on?
I
have
an
open
PR
that
clarifies
the
the
you
know,
someone
if
someone
wants
to
become
a
regular
member
of
the
cross-project
Council
clarified
some
some
some
of
the
requirements
that
that
we
want
around
that.
So
we
have
an
open
PR
for
that.
If
anybody's
interested
to
see
there's
been,
there
are
a
few
issues
around
code
of
conduct
and
our
weekly
meetings,
we've
been
kind
of
spinning
our
wheels.
A
C
Thank
you
for
the
clarification
that
is
important,
yeah,
it's
a
round
process
and
and
some
things
that
we
want
to
be
ahead
of
as
a
foundation.
You
know
an
umbrella
over
the
other
projects
so
yeah
anyway,
there
are
a
bunch
of
things
that
we
need
to
work
out,
they're
kind
of
more
complicated
we're
not
getting
progress.
We
decided
to
do
some
focused
meetings
on
moving
those
things
forward.
We
had
a
good
meeting
this
week
and
expect
to
have
another
one
next
week
and
you
know.
C
Hopefully
we
can
make
some
progress
on
some
of
those
things
how
we
manage
code
of
conduct
upstream
and
some
sort
of
advisory
panel
and
a
number
of
things
around
that
I'm,
not
sure
what
else
there
is
to
share
from
the
CPC
and
the
board.
At
this
time
I
mean
I,
guess
I
can
say
the
open,
Jas
world
events
has
officially
announced
that
it
is
going
virtual
and
it
is
also
free.
C
That's
happening,
June,
I,
think
twenty
third
and
fourth,
that
whole
week
is
going
to
be
open,
Jo,
stuff,
so
I
believe
the
Monday
is
a
you
know.
We
have
the
collaborator
summit
that
we
usually
add
on
to
the
events
or
have
happened
around
the
event.
Monday
is
I,
think
going
to
be
a
day
focused
on
new
contributors
to
open
source
projects
and
then
Tuesday
and
Wednesday
is
the
conference
and
then
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
is
the
conference
and
then
no
sorry,
Thursday
and
Friday
are
also
the
collapse
of
it
so
collapse.
C
It's
two
days
of
the
conference
two
days
of
collapse
on
anyway,
you
can
check
on
the
website
to
get
all
the
details.
I
think
that's
something
cool.
A
A
First,
agenda
item
is
notice.
Admin
second
director
see
creating
issues
that
can
postpone
on
TSE
compound.
So
basically,
this
is
just
the
the
nodejs
director
seat
that
we
had.
You
know
please
voice
any
thoughts.
Opinions
stuff
like
that
on
this,
it
doesn't
look
like
I,
don't
see
any
updates
in
that
issue,
which
we
should
probably
be
thinking
about.
Joe,
do
you
know
if
there's
anything
there
that
we
need
to
redo
it
I.
C
But
I
haven't
heard
like
strong,
like
you
know,
opinions
about
it
like
we
must
have
it
for
another
year.
I've
heard
other
areas
in
the
foundation.
You
know
suggest
that
it
should
be
more
of
a
community
seats
that
we
should
try
to
pull
it
from.
You
know
the
larger
community
and
not
just
node,
which
you
know
I
I,
don't
I,
don't
have
strong
opinions
either
way,
I
feel
like
if
it.
If
it
isn't
nodes
specific,
then
we
would
have
a
broader
pool
and
hopefully
bring
more
diversity
to
the
voices
and
the
conversation
of
the
board.
G
C
C
C
Is
this
something
else
Michael
seat
is
the
the
seat.
That
is
the
the
question
that
we're
discussing.
Michael
is
the
first
year.
You
know
I
think
so.
This
is
part
of
this
was
born
out
of
nodes.
I
don't
want
to
use
the
word
reluctance,
but
perhaps
hesitancy
to
merge
the
foundations,
or
at
least
some
folks
and
and
on
the
node
side
were
hesitant
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
did
to
try
and
you
know,
accommodate
or
at
least
kind
of
make
sure
that
nodes
I,
don't
think
influence
is
the
right
word
but
avoids.
C
A
You
know
as
reasonably
as
you
can
or
like
not.
You
know
not
every
one
of
the
42
meetings.
Monthly
note
but,
like
you
know,
coming
to
a
meeting
to
maybe
update
you
know
once
a
month
or
something
and
like
saying
for
other
projects
that
would
request
that
that
make
sense
or,
alternatively,
having
a
separate
meeting
with
that
person,
I,
don't
know
there.
It
would
be
nice
to
be
able
to
make
that
have
more
direct
access
to
that
for
everyone,
rather
than
just
thoughts.
A
I
think
it's
issue
for
38
in
32,
the
CPC
thing
yeah,
yes,
I
I
think
that's
a
very
reasonable
thing
and
I
I
can
well
unless
I
would
prefer
someone
else
take
it.
But
you
know
if
someone's
willing
to
take
that
and
comment
that
in
that
issue,
that'd
be
awesome
and
then,
if
not
I
can't,
but
it
would
be
super
cool.
If
someone
else
good
yeah.
G
A
C
A
A
A
C
A
F
F
I
can
help
it,
but
the
what's
left
here.
It's
just
drafting
the
whole
process
and
then
managing
maybe
a
little
bit
of
stuff
in
the
Trello
board
and
then
making
or
maybe
a
public
blog
post
about.
We
have
this
new
process
and
what's
the
way
that
that
option
is
oh,
maybe
we
could
go
if
we
don't
have
enough
time,
for
this
is
what
rich
was
also
suggesting
in
a
comment
somewhere.
A
A
Like
publishing
in
a
larger
group
thing,
syndicating
I
guess
is
probably
the
best
word
into
a
larger
thing
when
they
can
have
their
own
platform
is
one
of
the
trends
I've
seen
recently.
So
you
know,
I
would
be
open
to
that.
I
don't
know
like
I.
Definitely
don't
have
the
bandwidth
to
be
able
to
both
finish
the
process
and
then
do
the
blog
post
and
then
also
do
the
Trello
board.
I.
Definitely
don't
have
that
bandwidth,
so
yeah,
you
know
if
this
is
something
we
want
to
consider.
A
And
I
would
I
think
I
think
help
me
I
think
that
it
would
be
valuable
to
so
I
guess
some
context.
I
have
here
is
the
team
I
made
at
Microsoft.
We
had
a
very
I
hope
to
start
up
the
collection
well
before
I
joined
Microsoft,
but
once
I
was
at
Microsoft.
We
had
a
very
similar
process
for
our
medium
publication
and
one
of
the
things
I
started
once
I
was
within.
Microsoft
was
I,
helped
start
up
the
either
dev
tube
group
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
started
doing.
A
There
is
trusting
people
to
post
content,
that's
relevant
in
it
rather
than
like
having
a
process,
and
that
has
been
incredibly
successful
in
just
like
allowing
people
to
do
what
they
want
and,
like
you
know,
we
reasonably
trusted
that
the
people
in
this
are
going
to
in
one
post
hunts
of
content.
That's
not
like
code
of
conduct
violating
and
then
you
know.
A
Obviously,
we
will
address
it
if
it
is,
but
that's
probably
not
gonna
happen
and
then
to
like
just
getting
people
like
allowing
people
to
have
a
little
bit
more
creative
freedom,
and
it
is
definitely
like
limited
to
our
group,
like
my
org,
but
that's
something
I
helped
set
up
and
get
going
and
it's
been
running
for
over
a
year.
So
maybe
you
know
it
might
be
worth
moving
this
into
a
past
initiative
and
then
considering
how
we
could
implement
something
like
that
with
like
project
numbers
of
you.
A
F
A
D
A
Ecosystem
so
not
necessary,
the
project
were
from
the
ecosystem.
Who
were
you
know,
writing
cool
things,
and
we
wanted
to
have
a
platform
for
that
and
we
kind
of
wanted
to
help
provide
a
platform
that
we
could
help
amplify
and
and
make
it
a
little
bit
more
like
directly,
an
official
if
that
makes
sense
and
like
at
the
time
medium
publications
were
relatively
large
like
there
was.
A
You
know,
hacker
one
or
not
hacker
noon
and
then
quite
a
few
other
medium
publications-
and
this
was
us
so
to
some
extent
something
that
we
did
with
io
j
s.
So
we
did
have
an
IO
Jas
account
that
I
believe
people
publish
to
the
publications
weren't
a
feature
when
IO
just
happened,
but
it
was
kind
of
an
exhibit
extension
of
what
we
did
with
io
j
s
into
a
broader
scope,
and
it
was
very
much
to
help
enable
kind
of
giving
our
platform
to
the
community
and
ecosystem,
which
I
think
you
know.
A
A
lot
of
the
content
at
the
time
was
on
medium
and
it
was
being
published
into
people's
like
personal
account
or
whatever,
and
so
it
made
sense
like
here.
Here's
an
additional
layer
of
like
amplification
that
we
can.
We
can
provide
you
now.
That's
not
really
the
case
that
the
trend
I've
seen
has
been
personal
blogs
that
is
then
being
syndicated
out
to
other
sources.
A
So,
like
you
know,
someone
publishes,
you
know
if
I
were
to
publish
a
blog
I,
don't
do
this,
but
like
a
lot
of
people,
do
it's
like
a
B&B
that
I
own
slash
blog,
which
is
my
domain
and
then
like?
Have
that
automatically
publish
like
dev,
dev,
2
or
medium?
So
that's
generally,
the
the
path
I
see
which.
F
You
know
sorry,
no
God,
like
yeah
as
the
intent
was
to
have
a
place
for
people
to
have
more
content
about
node.js.
But
now,
if
we
see
we,
we
have
a
lot
of
other
resources.
People
for
people
to
go
to
and
have
like
on
dev
and
like
there
are
a
lot
of
I,
would
say
better,
maybe
publications
which
have
a
lot
of
more
content
about
node.js,
which
people
can
reach
out
to
which
was
maybe
not
the
case.
At
the
time
we
started
yeah.
A
And
I
think
it
was
very
much
like
a
way
to
try
to
help.
Hopefully
centralize,
to
like
one
of
the
problems,
though
it
is
have,
is
that
information
is
all
over
the
place
and
it's
hard
to
to
like
find
like
high
quality
information,
sometimes
because
it's
like
an
invisible
layer
under
all
of
the
stuff
that
people
are
doing
like
whether
you
know
if
you're
building,
Express
you're,
not
really
writing
stuff
for
note
you're
writing
stuff
for
Express,
or
you
know,
if
you're
building
a
feel
like
writing
stuff
for
the
COI
framework.
A
You're,
not
writing
something
about
node.
So
it's
it's
harder
to
gain
access
to
information,
which
is
one
of
the
reasons
I
was
kind
of
interested
in
pushing
in
this
direction
and,
like
examples
is
also
I,
guess
another
offshoot
of
that.
Like
almost
you
know,
very,
very
similar
intention
like
how
do
we
give
more
access
to
information
that
is
relevant
to
the
how
node
is
used
so
yeah
yeah
III
at
this
point?
I
am
unsure
if
it
would,
if
the
intent
the
original
intent
matches.
A
This
current
structure
and
I
do
think
that
republishing
from
our
blog
is
a
totally
valuable
thing,
especially
not
maybe
not
release
posts
because
they're
just
like
lists
but,
like
you
know
some
of
the
other
posts
around
like
security
and
stuff
like
that.
Although
how
we'd
have
to
update
that
which
would
be
a
process.
But
yet
some
of
the
things
could
potentially
be
helpful.
A
F
F
G
It
seems
like
were
the
bigger
sorry
Willie,
like
you're
cutting
up.
No,
it's
okay,
yeah
go
on,
it
seems
like
one
of
the
big
benefits
or
the
goals
was
to
be
able
to
amplify
good
content
from
the
community
through,
like
the
filter
of
I,
suppose
folks,
who
are
involved
in
the
foundation
and
the
node.js
project,
and
there
seems
like
there
might
be
a
possibility
that
it
overlaps
a
certain
extent
with
the
social
media
delegates
initiative
is.
This
is
emerging
a
possibility.
G
A
Say
less
of
emerging
and
more
of
a
replacement,
if
that
makes
sense,
I
think
that,
like
I
I,
don't
think
that
medium,
that's,
like
I,
think
management
of
the
medium
thing
and
like
approval
of
post
could
be
but
I
think
that
is
relatively
outside
of,
like
the
other,
it's
very
different
than
the
rest
of
the
scope.
I
I
think
that
the
social
media
team
solves
what
that
were
to
some
extent
solves
what
that
the
original
intent
was,
if
that
makes
sense,
so
it
like
it
helps
address
that
in
a
reasonable
way.
A
It
helps
solve
the
problem
in
2020
rather
than
in
2016
I.
Think
so.
Yeah,
no
sir
I
just
I'm
good
yeah,
so
I
think
I
would
agree
with
that,
because
I'm
extent
and
I
I
do
think
that,
probably,
as
we
get
a
little
bit
further
down
the
line
with
those
the
social
team
and
then
also
like
you
know,
once
we
you
know,
it
seems
like
we've
kind
of
discussed,
moving
on
or
like
kind
of
altering
our
course
with
with
the
notice
collection.
A
G
F
F
C
H
Hey
Joe
hi
guys,
so
you
was
that
there's
the
links
through
the
meeting
so
that
it
updates
on
get
up
issues.
But
let's
say
that
you
know
someone
who
wants
to
join,
who
has
never
done
it
before
we
have
no
way
of
knowing
that.
Okay,
this
is
in
the
github
issues.
You
have
to
go
so
there's
no
links
and
also
I
noticed
I,
just
updated
it
right
now.
H
A
A
C
A
A
The
calendar
links
or
the
calendar
entries
are
not
tied
to
the
the
ruling
at
all
it's
separate,
so
we
have
to
maintain
it
separately
and
basically,
what
happens
is
you
know
we
have
to
update
them,
overtime
and
stuff
and
that
one
just
never
got
the
zoom
like
added,
so
I
have
now
updated
it
to
include
the
correct,
zoom
link.
That
was
on
the
last
issue.
G
Diddy
part
of
what
Jimmy
had
mentioned,
where
people
who
find
the
calendar
link
and-
and
it's
been
more
frequent
recently
maybe
I-
have
noticed
people
asking
where
in
the
calendar
they
should
find
this
or
or
which
link
to
use.
It
might
be
helpful
for
us
to
start,
including
a
link,
for
example,
to
the
issues
of
the
relevant
repo
and
explained
that
meetings
are
listed
there
as
an
issue.
So
that's
what
I
do
my
personal
calendar
is
I,
don't
actually
use
this.
G
I
A
G
A
G
A
Works
well,
yeah,
the
there's
a
disconnect
between
the
calendar
and
and
the
tooling.
At
this
point,
which
I
think
some
of
the
tooling
that
is
being
trying
to
do
trying
to
be
worked
on
in
the
package
is
repo
than
the
meet
github.
Action
will
potentially
try
to
solve
this,
but
yeah.
That's
it's
complicated
and
also
like.
Not
all
not
all
groups
like
I,
don't
think
the
TFC
publishes
their
zoom
I
could
be
wrong.
It's.
B
A
And
so
like
Hong
Kong
is
a
little
bit
more
liberal
with
that
and
like
we
generally
promote
people
in
if
it's
like
I
make
like
I
generally
promote
people
in.
If
it's
a
name
I've
seen
in
the
project,
I,
don't
I,
try
not
to
just
promote
games,
I
just
randomly
see
just
as
a
zoom
bombing
stuff
and,
like
you
know,
other
people
like
I
can't
there's
their
guarantees.
If
I
don't
recognize
someone
from
participating
compound
they're
not
going
to
come
in
violate
the
code
of
contacts
and
have
that
codified
in
the
YouTube.
A
I
Format
for
the
link
in
the
calendar
would
be
useful,
though,
like
the
you
know,
because
everybody
I
think
different
people
create
them
somewhere.
It
was
like
here's
what
we
typically
put
in
them,
like
you
said,
if
it's
like,
can
even
be
a
search
based
on
something.
That's
gonna
find
you
the
most
recent
meetings
that
would
actually
be
quite
handy.
Yeah,
I,
don't.
I
A
Yeah
and
I
think
that
where
this
is
definitely
hopeful,
but
one
of
the,
if
we
can
get
the
new
Google
SDK
Stork,
one
of
the
things
that
we're
I
think
gonna
try
to
solve
and
meet
is
creating
the
meetings
from
that.
So
it's
defined
by
the
contraction
they're
like
the
metadata
in
the
repo
and
then
that
basically
every
time
they
could
either
update
or
create
the
calendar
entry
with
the
github
issue.
So
there
is
today's
in.
A
I
A
I
have
tried
and
failed
yeah.
It's
not
not
ideal,
oh
yeah,
so,
theoretically,
this
is
something
that
we
can
definitely
improve
right
now.
You
know
potentially
going
through
and
just
having
a
basic
template
for
that
and
then
having
the
people
who
have
access
to
it.
Go
through
and
edit
it
like.
There
are
I
guess
you
could
do.
You'd
only
need
to
do
two
weeks
of
meetings,
so,
like
20
meetings,
roughly
that
you
would
need
to
fill
that
out
in
it's
something
that
we
could
probably
do.
I
A
F
A
F
A
A
I
A
I
I
I
You
know
the
node.js
project
just
happened
to
continue
to
provide
a
direct
representative.
It
has
a
people
who
are
willing
to
volunteer
for
the
position.
Thus,
you
casino
director
director
director
is
no
longer
to
have
that
with
the
CPC
direction.
Is
no
one
going
to
have
the
direct
received
assigned
to
the
project
the
project
like
to
be
consulted
involved
in
the
discussion,
so
that
was
kind
of
the
there
wasn't
a
strong
ask
that
it
be
maintained,
but
on
the
flip
side
there
was
kind
of,
like
you
know,
we're
happy
with
the
current
status
quo.
I
A
My
question
bitters
like
if,
if
it
were
shoved
up
to
the
foundation,
would
that
prevent
node
from
continuing
to
do
it?
That
way,
like
I,
think
they
would
only
increase
the
ability
for,
like
I,
mean
node
would
still
be
able
to
like
you
know,
someone
from
the
TSC
could
potentially
still
run
for
that
or.
A
Fun
or
whatever,
and
then
that
would
also
open
the
ability
for
others
to
have
it
right,
which
I
think
is
I
think
that's
relatively
reasonable
of
to
like
kind
of
since
we're
in
a
place
where
we're
questioning
it
begin
to
open
that
up
in
a
way
that,
like
node,
will
still
be
able
to
carry
that
torch
if
we
want
to
or
like
if
there
is
no
reason,
if
there's
no
I,
don't
want
to
say
competition,
but
that's
the
closest
word
I
have.
If
there's
no,
like
you
know,
contest
I,
guess,
but
I
do
think.
A
It
is
probably
positive
to
begin
to
open
that
up
a
bit
more.
You
know
if,
if
the
TSE
is
open
to
that
I
I
think
from
our
discussion,
because
we
did
discuss
this
a
bit
of
length
yeah,
it
does
seem,
like
you
know
at
least
calm.
Calm
is
relatively
okay
with
with
it
not
being
note
I,
you
know,
I
don't
represent
everyone,
but
yeah.
I
I
There
wasn't
the
agreement
to
say
we're
just
happy
for
it
not
to
be
yeah,
but
there
was
no
strong.
We
want
it
to
be
either
yeah.
It
was
kind
of
like
I
think
that
the
tact
the
TSE
took
was
like
there's
work.
It
takes
work,
so
we're
still
happy
to
do
the
work
and
we
have
somebody
he's
willing
to
do
the
work
and
we
haven't
heard
anybody
suggest
anything
else.
So
we're
happy
for
it
to
continue.
But
if
you
want
to
something
else,
just
make
sure
we're
involved
in
discussion
yeah.
I
I
We
just
need
to
get
the
agreements
so
that
the
you
know
no
I
guess
we
can
either
the
approach
the
TC
I
think
was
trying
to
take
was
like
CPC
tell
us
what
you're
thinking
yeah
and
we'll
go
from
there,
but
it's
the
calm.
Calm
is
like
hey:
no,
we
really
think
it
should
be
moved
up.
We
should
have
that
discussion
because
if
that's
the
day.
A
A
It's
like
you
know,
it'd,
be
nice
to
be
a
good
citizen
with
the
foundation
they're
like
I.
Don't
we're
gonna
stop
doing
the
work
like
we
I
think
no
I
have
zero
doubts
that
node
will
run
for
that,
and
so
it's
more
of
like
cool.
No,
it
runs
and
we
get
it
awesome
if
other
people
run
that's
also
great,
because
then
there's
you
know
more
representation
and
stuff
like
that.
So
yeah
I
think
that
was
more
videos
like
equally
passive,
just
slightly
leaning
the
other
direction.
I
C
I
Think
the
governance
does
say
it
needs
to
be
a
voting
member
as
well.
Even
the
community
seat,
I
believe
so
yeah,
oh.
If
so,
that's
not
that's,
unfortunately,
that
that
I
mean
I've
had
the
thought
of.
Is
that
still
what
we
want?
That's
what
the
governance
says
today
and
you
know
that's
one
of
the
reasons
that
I
we're
having
the
voting
members
from
the
regular
members.
I
I
I
I
guess
Tierney
is
like
you
know.
If
you
can
comment
in
there
like
it
is
it
comes
down
to,
we
could
just
say
no
strong
feelings
come
come.
What
do
you
think
and
then
have
that
drug
the
conversation
or
we
could,
you
know,
go
with
the
will
come
come
was
leaning
this
way.
Should
we
discuss
that
with
the
TSE
and
see
if
they
say,
okay?
Well,
let's,
let's
lean
that
way,
yeah.
C
C
C
Okay,
so
so
yeah
I
guess
I'll
just
say
you
know
thanks
everyone
for
joining
I,
look
forward
to
talking
more
on
the
issues
and
seeing
everybody
and
a
couple
of
weeks
and
we'll
continue
on
thanks
Cheers.
Thank
you.
Talk
to
everybody
later
yeah
night.