►
From YouTube: Community Committee Meeting
Description
A
A
Before
we
do
that,
if
you
have
just
joined
the
meeting,
if
you're,
if
you're
participating
in
the
meeting
in
the
zoo,
I
people
peek
at
yourself
to
be
the
the
doc,
the
Google
Doc
in
separate
participant
section
to
be
fantastic,
I
will
taste
it
again.
Just
in
case
you
did
not
get
it
then
Michael
flips
it
there.
You
go
so
do
70
zoom
try
to
keep
good
idea
to
be
fantastic
cool.
Let's
move
on
to
initiative
updates
anyone,
anyone
running
or
spitting
in
the
initiatives
have
enough
a
bit
like
I.
B
A
C
You
know
stuff,
but
right
now
we
are
only
focused
on
since
it's
a
new
initiative
and
there's
a
lot
to
do
you're
only
a
exploring
how
we
can
you
know,
make
the
meet-ups
consistent
and
by
that,
but
but
making
meetups
consistent
were
timey
as
making
sure
there's
a
single
frame
but
flexible
enough
that
everyone
can
use
and
we
can
improve
it
to
have
content
sort
of
corner
injections
from
the
you
know.
Different
mediums
happening
happening
all
over
the
world
where
media
organizers
could
improve
the
node.js
pledge,
and
so
part
of
that
idea
was
to
build.
C
You
know
have
some
sort
of
a
meetup.com
noches,
no
way
we
could
offer
different
organizers,
you
know
who
could
run
different
meetups
or
you
know,
offer
them
meetup
different
media
accounts
and
I
meet
them
in
a
box
or
different
templates
through
which
they
could
run
mediums.
So
Adam
and
I
were
Adam.
Meyer
and
I
were
looking
into
how
we
can
do
that
with
medium
dot-com,
and
that
is
where
we
are
right
now.
C
A
Any
other
updates
progress
continues
on
website.
Redesign
people
are
can
do
regular
flows
across
the
last
meeting.
We
discuss
how
we're
going
to
consume
localized
documentation
that
still
has
an
action
to
lucre
my
80mm
that
we're
still
working
on
like
connecting
and
seeing
what
that
would
look
like
that
is
somewhat
tied
to
how
the
API
is
API.
A
So
I
one
thing
I
will
do
real
quick
is
I
know
it's
been
a
few
weeks
since
I
gave
an
update
on
moderation.
So
let
me
pull
that
that
bond
out
real,
quick
and
I
can
go
ahead
and
do
that
I
mean
just
right.
So
the
last
report
was
on
February
7th.
It
is
now
April
18th,
so
I
just
went
to
surely
one
to
the
fork
update
since
that
received
entity
report
to
report.
A
A
Okay,
so
first
item
on
the
agenda,
you
know
J
/
summit
sessions
leave
Berlin
collaborators,
Sunday
Vanille
I
went
in
our
last
meeting.
I
think
it
was
last
might've
been
the
one
before
I
submitted
a
form
for
this,
but
while
he
reached
out
to
me
saying
he
didn't
see
it,
would
you
be
able
to
look
to
see
if
that
actually
went
through
or
not
I
am.
It
is
an
issue,
but
it
didn't
go
through,
maybe
totally
submitted.
D
A
A
A
form
so
I
submit
before
okay,
perfect
I
could
definitely
check
out
that
gun
went
through
I
could
do
that
drink
the
drink.
Okay,
oh
it
looks
like
there
might
yeah
cool
there's
like
a
weird
texture
at
the
beginning.
That
was
what
yeah,
maybe
also,
if
you
could
do
that,
and
if
not
I
can
go
ahead
and
again
the
ideally
wouldn't
like
to
have
most
of
you
do
the
same
thing
twice
right:
oh
yeah,
yeah.
A
Totally
the
organization
of
this
one
has
been
quite
a
bit
different
from
ones
like
we're,
engaging
both
former
foundations
at
the
same
time
and
I.
Don't
think
that
that
works
for
folks
in
know,
Jess
early
works
for
folks
who
are
from
the
former
MSF
for
one
thing.
I
there
is
in
the
planning
committee,
people,
car
wearing
white
folks
aren't
submitting
as
many
sessions
as
as
I
suppose,
but,
like
form
our
perspective
folks
in
know
just
ten
to
seven
sessions.
A
You
think,
then
it's
we
can
make
some
fields
unnecessary,
just
emphasize
that
it
could
be
incomplete
for
the
moment
and
they
can
come
and
fill
it
up
later.
That.
B
Might
help
I
think
I
mean
it
we're
sort
of
going
from
something
that
was
pretty
informal
before
was
like
open
and
github
issue.
That
says
what
you
want
to
talk
about,
and
it
could
have
been
pretty
simple
before
which
was
just
like:
hey
we're
gonna
get
together.
The
diagnostics
working
group
right,
we're
gonna
figure
out
what
we're
gonna
talk
about
closer
to
the
time.
Now
you
actually
got
to
fill
out
in
a
bunch
of
things
and
explain
while
you're
doing
it
he's
anything,
it's
just
a
little
bit
more.
You
know
you
got
to
think
more.
A
A
Can't
see
why
that
would
hurt
us.
We
we
just
want
to
know
like
for
planning
the
collapse,
but
we
just
need
to
know
how
much
time
people
want
and
what
size
room
they
want
and
what
they
want
to
talk
about
it
basically
to
fill
out
like
put
a
label
in
the
room
and
put
it
in
the
schedule
and
figure
out
which
size
room
to
allocate
to
people
that's
necessary.
Knowing
it's
what
folks
plan
to
talk
about,
because
it's
a
collapse
of
it.
Oh.
A
Can
you
worry
about
the
safety
thing
the
yellow
box
went
over
your
icons?
Oh
yeah
I'm
just
well.
It
might
be
just
this
meeting
of
the
background.
Oh
yeah
I.
Is
there
anything
else
that
we
wanna
discuss
on
this
specifically
like
any
questions
about
submitting
or
anything
like
that
that
we'd
like
to
ask?
No
all
we
have
in
here.
A
Cool
I'll
take
that
listen
man
can
I
just
if
you're
about
to
wrap
this
one
up,
I
want
to
ask
folks
to
take
it
back
to
their
initiatives
and
working
groups
that
they
they
should
submit
sessions.
And,
yes,
please
do
submit
placeholders
as
github
issues.
I'll
go
iron
that
out
later,
but
I'm
sure
that's
completely
fine
I
mean
to
yell
tonight
you
about
the
submission.
After
all,
Thanks
I'm.
G
Sorry,
but
no
pod
yeah,
you
guys
I
was
I,
was
gonna,
say
sorry
to
your
needy.
Were
you
gonna
say
something
I,
don't
wanna
interrupt?
Okay!
Okay,
sorry
for
my
ignorance
here,
but
I
I
realized,
I
I
could
probably
propose
something
but
I
don't
know
the
details
and
what
the
process
the
expectations
are
is.
F
G
A
A
F
F
You
have
been
on
the
bootstrap
calls.
Is
that
we're
aiming
for
May
1st
so
and
that's
for
selection
or
like
us,
calling
up
right
each
project
calling
up
their
representatives
are
nominating
them
in
the
bootstrap
rivo.
So
because,
then
again
here
is
those
folks
need
to
get
rolling
on
stuff
before
the
club
7?
F
It's
not
a
club
summit
and
there's
a
lot
of
decisions
right
now
that
are
sort
of
waiting
or
not
even
just
decisions,
initiatives
that
really
require
the
CPC
to
be
whole
in
order
for
them
to
proceed
I'm
in
order
for
us
to
proceed,
so
we
can
push
it
right
like
if
we
have
trouble
with
the
election
selection
and
the
nomination
and
election
process
happening
before
May
1st.
We
can,
you
know,
push
it
out
a
little
bit
because
we
don't
want
to
arbitrarily
rush.
You
know
this
process,
but
yeah
the
hope.
G
A
And
so
Adam
posted
issue
470,
so
it
looks
like
he
has
outlined
the
beats
that
he's
set
up
for
the
election
process.
Sorry
percentage,
which
yesterday
yeah
yesterday
is
when
they
she
went
up.
Nominations
are
gonna,
be
closed
on
April
22nd
see
that's
in
five
days,
I
think
for
four
days.
So,
if
you
want
to
nominate
someone,
you
are
more
than
welcome
to
please
do
that
soon
the
nominations
are
open.
It
looks
like
to
anyone,
but
the
calm,
calm.
A
If
someone
who
is
not
in
the
condom
once
to
nominate
an
individual
to
be
the
representative,
they
need
to
also
have
some
unmet
for
the
pom-pom,
like
+1,
that
basically
arm
D
22nd.
Also
candidate
statements
in
QA
is
she's
leap
opened
on
github
on
April,
26
to
name
will
be
closed
and
balloting
will
open
and
then
on
April
30th
at
CPC
of
arms.
Inner
of
the
balloting
like
voting
will
close.
The
balloting
also
is
on
the
30th
and
we
will
be
whatever
wins
will
be
art
sequences
representative.
A
B
F
B
F
F
Those
are
collaborators
right,
but
yeah
I,
don't
know
I
think
maybe
that's
what
Adam
was
trying
to
do
here
in
the
writing.
That
says
someone
who
is
a
collaborator
or
calm,
calm,
member,
because
I
think
the
idea
here
is
that
Hong
Kong
should
be
a
way
out
right,
calm,
calm!
As
the
voting
members,
we,
who
ever
we
feel
comfortable
with
are
aware
of
their
work
and
think
would
be
a
good
representative
should
be
more
competitive
on
the
CPC
I
think
it
is
unlikely
that
someone
who's
not
in
the
voting
right
but
I,
don't
know
it.
F
B
H
B
Read
into
so
far
on
the
TSC
side,
just
to
context
there
we
did
say
you
know
we're
gonna
follow
the
similar
process
to
what
we
we
did
with
our
director
elections.
The
assumption
was
that
the
only
nominees
would
be
or
from
the
TSC
on
that
side.
So
I'm,
like
I,
think
you
can
make
the
the
similarity
argument.
But,
like
you
said,
it's
a
decision
that
this
group
should
just
make
that
says:
okay,
who
are
the
candidates,
so
the.
A
B
I
think
I
cast
it
in
the
for
the
first
time,
yeah.
That
makes
sense
not
that
it
can't
be
changed
if
we
think
something
else
is,
is
the
right
way
to
go,
but
it's
consistent
with
what
we
did
for
the
director
representation
or
representatives.
So
it's
probably
a
good
way
to
you
know
in
the
transition
only
changed
a
certain
number
of
things
at
a
toggle
yeah.
A
And
I
definitely
think
that
that's
generally
true
of
this
entire
process,
because
this
is
something
to
employee
to
everyone,
including
the
column
for
an
TSE
and
every
other
project.
That's
doing
this
so
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
a
learning
experience
for
everyone
and
I'm
sure
we
will
make
improvements
for
the
next
run.
F
That
they
read
across
the
CPC,
Charter
and
sort
of
ask
questions
if
they
need
to
people
who
have
been
participating.
We
can
building
out
this
governance
to
sort
of
manage
expectations
on
the
amount
of
time
that
they
would
be
committed
to
this.
So
I.
Don't
think
that
that's
something
that
we
explicitly
say,
but
the
idea
here
is
this:
is
you
know
another
type
of
almost
like
you
know
combined?
F
You
know
almost
like
a
project
Board
of
Directors
in
itself,
but
a
more
open,
obviously,
because
you
can
attend
all
the
meetings,
even
if
you're
not
a
voting
member
of
the
CPC.
But
the
idea
here
is
that
you
have
to
do
the
work
to
attend,
be
aware
of
what
what's
going
on
there
and
make
sure
to
communicate
well
back
and
forth
between
our
group,
as
well
as
the
CPC,
and
that
can
be
a
fair
amount
of
meeting
scheduled
ad-hoc
stuff
during
the
week.
So
just
like.
Keep
that
in
mind,
as
you
consider
nominating
not.
B
B
You
know
quite
a
quite
engaged
in
and
be
active,
but
there's
also
regular
members
who
you
know
can
participate
and
in
the
votes
and
and
basically
you
know
being
do
99%
of
the
work
anyway
and
there's
also
observers
for
people
who
just
want
to
show
up
occasionally
so
there's
lots
of
different
ways
to
be
part
and
contribute
to
the
CPC
and
voting
you
know
being
the
voting
representative
for
a
project
is
only
one
of
them
and
in
fact
we
hope
we
have
lots
of
people
who
aren't
those
voting
members
participating
in
driving
work.
So
you.
A
And
similar
to
the
calm,
calm
you
know,
boats
are,
and
also
the
TSE
boats
are
intended
to
not
happen.
Often
so
it
is,
it
is
less
about
voting
and
more
about
like
the
amount
and
level
of
work
that
you're
committing
to,
which
is
probably
more
than
10
hours
a
week
if
I'm
guessing
like
it's
a
non-trivial
amount
of
time
per
week-
and
you
know,
judging
for
my
kind
of
Hong
Kong
there,
it's
probably
gonna,
go
up
to
20
in
some
weeks.
So
keep
that
in
mind.
F
B
A
Checkers
cool
and
also
better
place
to
people
watching
this
is
Ahmad
or
on
YouTube.
If
you
are
engaged
in
the
projects,
node
or
otherwise.
That
also
applies
to
you
be
CPC
is
a
different
model
than
the
PSC
and
I'm
coming
physically
followed
and
more
than
welcoming
to
people
who
are
engaged
and
funded.
The
person
wanting
to
work.
F
A
A
A
Let
me
gather
my
thoughts
if,
if
Tracy
wanted
to
share
anything
specific
that
was
new,
we
have
four
rooms
there,
I'll
just
update
folks,
just
in
case
you
don't
know,
we
have
four
rooms
over
there
so
far.
What
we're
discussing
is
that
there'll
be
one
main
room,
great
cut
rooms,
and
recently
someone
suggested
that
we
use
one
of
the
smaller
breakout
rooms
as
a
sort
of
rotating
sort
of
lounge
for
people
to
have
more
ad
hoc
conversations.
Oh
that's
likely
going
to
happen.
A
We're
hoping-
or
at
least
my
perception
of
it
is
the
way
folks
use
the
community
corner
ad
note
interactive
to
just
have
conversations
in
between
talks.
Maybe
that's
how
that
room
will
be
used
some
of
the
time
and
on
the
subject
of
the
venue,
I
think
everything
is
good
to
go.
We
finalized
most
of
what's
needed.
Now
we
were
just
talking
about
swag
and
stuff.
People
are
talking
about
t-shirts
and
having
the
logo
on
it,
like
the
new,
open,
Jas
logo.
A
I.
Think
last
update
on
that
one
is
that
we
sent
out
a
request
for
a
coat
and
we're
still
waiting
on
a
coat
for
what
this
wide
would
be
like
what
this
pipe
would
cost
we're
still
looking
for
sponsors
for
the
collaborator
summit,
we
have
a
couple,
but
still
looking
for
more.
This
is
I
suppose
a
more
expensive
collaborator
summit
than
usual
because
of
the
larger
number
of
expected
people
from
the
multiple
projects
that
are
now
part
of
open,
Jas
and
yeah.
A
F
A
The
layout
of
the
hotel
that
I
saw
we're
at
the
the
Marriott
city
center
in
Berlin.
As
far
as
I
saw
their
layout,
the
hotel
doesn't
look
like
there's
there's
much
of
a
like
common
sitting
area,
I
suppose
we'll
need
chairs,
and
these
will
be
some
couches.
But
I
can
confirm
that
so
I
suppose
your
suggestion,
as
we
don't
like,
give
up
an
entire
room
just
for
that.
F
F
We
still
probably
want
the
ability
to
have
a
room
that
can
be
booked
opposed
same
day
for
conversations
that
come
up,
but
it
still
needs
to
be
because
otherwise
you'll
have
people
who,
like
may
have
a
discussion
time,
but
because
they
don't
have
you
know
they
could
sit
in
there
all
day
talking
about
whatever,
when
somebody
else
room
and
they
just
don't
realize
it.
You
know,
and
people
are
especially
there's
many
people
who
don't
necessarily
know
each
other
may
not
feel
comfortable
speaking
up
to
ask
if
they
could.
A
Totally
so
I'm
hearing
that
having
that
room
ad
hoc
left
open
for
ad
hoc
discussions
makes
sense,
but
on
the
day
of
it
will
still
need
booking
cool
yeah.
I'm
I'll
make
a
note
of
that
and
we'll
see
if
we
can
get
that
one
set
up,
because,
yes,
a
pass
code
optimist,
we
have
had
last-minute
rearranging
to
fit
discussions
in
like,
like
last
time,
governance
discussion
just
took
up
an
entire
room
for
the
entire
day.
H
E
A
G
A
I
think
ladylee
it
opened
it
and
yeah
there
might
have
been
a
specific
intent
around
it.
That
I
can't
see
it.
Okay,.
B
Cool
I
think
that
the
speed
the
progress
one
it
was
just
a
thought-
was
like
a
periodic
update,
made
sense.
I
think
you
might
roll
in
the
call
for
sessions
one
into
that
now.
Yeah
right,
like
it
made
sense
for
that
when
they
were
first
open
to
say,
hey,
there's
a
call
for
sausage
sessions,
I'd
close
that
one
and
then
leave
the
the
update.
One
is
a
place,
people
that
say:
oh
yeah
ups,
we
don't
like
submissions,
don't
worry
anymore!
So
hey!
We
still
need
more
of
that
kind
of
thing.
A
E
E
A
I
Yeah,
of
course,
I
mean
I
think
this
is
more
developed
to
an
expression
that
we
had
a
few
months
back,
and
so
this
is
kind
of
the
next
step
in
that
process.
So
yeah
I'm
happy
to
share
that
can
probably
share
that
by
industry.
Is
that
work?
And
then,
if
we
want
to
pick
it
back
up
on
the
next
con
column
works,
we
want
to
try
to
figure
it
out
via
email
or
you
know,
whatever
works
back
to
a
good
script,.
I
Think
I
think
it's
tied
to
an
issue.
That's
already
open
regarding
a
node.js
collection,
refi
I
want
to
say,
but
let
me
go
back
and
double-check
and
it's
not
I'll
make
sure
that
it
that
I've
been
there
and
we
can
just
document
everything
that
we
do.
Awesome.
E
I
B
I
B
D
I
D
I
Yes,
we
do
have
a
list
of
editors
and
we
do
have
an
alias
we're.
Keep
that
so
that's
where
I'm
seeing
most
of
the
submissions
come
through
is
through
the
medium
email,
alias
and
so
yeah.
That's
that's
through
the
prop
how
the
processes
work
that
far
and
I
think
there
are
they're
having
to
some
discussions
about
how
we
want
to
improve
that
process
mm-hmm
and
from
what
I
can
recall
them.
The
idea
there
was
kind
of
get
some
of
the
initial
research
out
of
the
way.
D
I
D
D
I
D
I
It
would
really
just
be
a
really
nice
partnership.
You
know
between
you,
know,
foundation
and
community,
and
so
I've
posted
into
the
the
chat
here
is
the
blog
that
would
outline
everything.
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
start
with
that
or
kind
of
want
to
take
a
step
back
and
just
kind
of
regroup.
On
some
previous
conversations
that
we've
had
it's
up
to
you
guys
how
you
want
to
you
all
how
you
wanna
proceed.
A
So
my
interpretation
of
kind
of
has
come
up.
Is
that
me
to
discuss
a
while
ago
and,
like
I'm
really
haven't
see
the
I
think
we
can?
Probably
because
of
that
like
be
ready,
agreed
on
this
concept,
I'm
guessing
that
we
can
kind
of
move
into
the
blog
post?
That
said,
do
I
guess
for
this.
Do
we
want
to
have
calm,
calm
members
like
review
the
blog
votes
or
like
I?
Guess?
How
do
you
want
to
go
about
I.
I
Mean
this
is
definitely
a
joint
thing,
so
I
mean
I
would
love
it
for
I.
Would
love
it
for
folks
to
kind
of
go
in
there
and
see
if
there's
anything
missing,
I
mean
really
want
this
to
be
a
very
you
know,
informative
post
around.
This
is
how
you
can
get
involved.
This
is
what's
involved,
so
if
there
are
comments
that
you
want
to
make
to
it,
I
do
encourage
that
or
if
they're
questions
you
know,
I
think
it's
definitely
worth
the
discussion
just
so
that
we
can
have
a
nice
face
it.
I
I
So
I
mean
I
would
think
so
we
have
a
pretty
and
we
have
a
pretty.
These
are
pretty
active,
Twitter
community,
so
I
mean
that
that
would
be
the
nobody
said
to
me.
Hey
I
want
to
do
this.
I
do
think
it
would
be
interesting
to
to
put
it
out
there
and
offer
it
as
an
opportunity
for
folks
you
get
involved.
Yeah
I.
B
F
B
B
F
I
think
it's
a
good
point
just
to
say
like
well.
You
could
open
it
up
to
like
hey
people.
You
know,
if,
please
let
us
know
if
five
to
ten
hours
is
not
reasonable
but
like
the
number
of
hours
you'd
be
willing
to
commit,
and
if
there
are
enough
people
who
step
up
who
can
commit
the
five
to
ten
hours
than
the
people
who
can't
commit,
as
many
would
need
to
be
like
wait-listed,
right,
yeah.
B
I
A
I
I
guess
I'm
coming
at
this
from
a
slightly
different
context
of
like
other
projects
that
are
in
the
foundation
where
they
manage
their
own
Twitter
accounts,
and
it's
not
there's
like
a
few
things
to
that
that
are
very
different
than
what's
being
proposed
here,
where
it's
like
not
a
like
a
requirement
or
even
kind
of
a
suggestion
of
how
much
time
it
goes
into
it.
It's
just
you
kind
of
do
it,
and
then,
on
top
of
that,
like
there's,
not
really
like
consent
about
incentivize,
I
I,
don't
know
if
incentive
izing.
A
F
B
Did
have
two
points:
I'm,
not
when
I
read
it
the
first
time
I
thought
the
swipe.
It
was
a
bit
funny.
F
B
D
F
So
that's
why
we're
here
trying
for
a
job,
more
volunteers,
for
it
when
you
have
things
that
are
particularly
like
unfun
tourist
type,
things
like
if
it's
interesting
great,
but
if
we're
not
getting
a
lot
of
volunteers
dangling
the
carrot
of
a
$50,
you
know,
certificate
to
the
swag
store
is
certainly
a
way
to
help
with
that.
Also
not
we
can't
do
that
with
other
things.
Moving
forward
right.
This
is
just
like
the
first
thing,
they're
offering
it
for
right.
B
E
A
B
So
I
mean
if
this
is
something
that
we
could
turn
around
and
say:
we
want
to
start
sprinkling
$50
vouchers
across
a
whole
bunch
of
different
parts
of
the
project.
Right
then
it
doesn't
worry
me
as
much
if
it's
like.
Well,
we've
done
it
once
and
if
somebody
else
says
hey
that
makes
sense
to
us
too
in
a
cycle
wait
a
second.
We
can't
do
that
for
everybody,
then
that's
where
you
know
it's.
It's
a
very
public
place.
So
we'll
see
people
seeing
saying
hey,
look
they're,
giving
it
voters
for
this
one
yeah.
A
Yeah
I
was
just
to
say:
we
do
need
to
time
track.
We
do
have
a
small
session,
something
to
mention
in
the
private
session
and
I
do
want
to
get
to
that
I'm
not
trying
to
come
in
when
I
apologize,
I
am
going
to
say,
need
time,
box
this
and
get
in
the
private
session.
So
if,
if
is
there
an
issue
for
this.
D
A
Yeah
I
suggest
we
go
even
so:
I
hadn't
either
create
a
new
issue
or
open
well
the
earth
in
me
or
open,
reopen
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
reopen
one
of
the
previously,
but
if
you
can't
we
can
get
it
for
you
and
then
we
will
get
you
set
up
and
like
let's
continue
that
discussion
there,
but
yeah.
We
do
need
that
one
system,
fortunately
with
that
I,
am
going
to
go
ahead
and
end
the
stream.
Thank
you.
Everyone,
I
will
say
thanks
for
in
for
the
discussion
today
on
that
blog
post.