►
Description
The agenda for this meeting can be found at: https://github.com/nodejs/community-committee/issues/80
A
B
I'm
Jen
Turner
and
my
handle
on
Twitter
is
high.
There
is
generates
and
then
everywhere
else
I'm
run
run
edge,
which
is
Jen
Turner
backwards
and
yeah
I'm.
This
is
my
first
time
doing
the
secretary
for
minutes
taking
things
so
I'm
happy
that
there's
a
small
turnout
and
we
don't
have
that
much,
but
yeah
I
write
the
node
community
newsletter
for
the
node
foundation
and
I've
been
a
part
of
the
community
since
2012,
so
I'm,
very
interested
in
this
group,
and
what
we're
gonna
do.
Oh.
C
D
A
D
A
And
it
just
saw
everyone's
now
is
that
one
of
the
reasons
that
we
like
to
do
introductions
is
a
lot
of
us.
We
see
each
other
active
online.
We
aren't
tailee
good
at
putting
like
names
to
faces
and
like
what
we
do
and
things
like
that
so
I
like
to
that
just
so
that
everyone
kind
knows
who
we
are
all
right,
so
we're
going
to
start
it
on
our
agenda
today.
It's
a
fairly
short
one
first
want
to
start
off
with
claw
request
number
77.
A
So
this
is
adding
Jen
Antony
as
members.
So
the
reason
I
that
I
open
this
flow
request.
I
want
to
get
a
discussion
going.
Is
that
and
we
have
this
new
minute
taking
position
and
right
now,
neither
the
people
who
have
volunteered
to
be
minute.
Takers
are
actually
members,
so
I
opened
this
out,
but
we've
also
been
having
some
discussion
around
how
we
add
by
people
as
members
and
like
what
should
that
process.
Look
like
and
so
I
come
on.
I
have
a
discussion
both
on
the
PR
itself
white.
A
You
know,
should
we
move
forward
this
right
now,
but
also
should
we
flesh
out
the
membership
requirements
first,
which
they
would
like
things
like
that
and
so
a
Tracey.
You
had
a
few
comments
well
kind
of
outlining
somebody,
this
discussions
around
this.
Would
you
like
to
come
so
right
now
around
somewhat
so
those
were
ideas
were
yeah.
F
So
I
don't
want
to
hold
this
up
because
I
like
I,
think
that
they
should
be
members.
I.
Just
think
that
we've
talked
about
in
a
number
of
sessions
we
haven't
had
at
PR,
but
we've
talked
about
the
like
the
quick,
the
simple,
explicit
path.
For
now
that
we
wanted
was
just
you
know
your
observer
for
three
months
and
then,
if
you've
met
the
minimum
participation,
we
put
you
on
as
a
member
and
I.
F
It
feels
a
little
arbitrary
just
because
a
community
committee
is
so
new
and
like
basically
the
people
who
were
around
it
like
the
first
lineup
got
added
a
PR
and
then
after
we
realized
we
needed
to
have
a
membership
idea
PR.
Then
we
needed
to
follow
it,
but
we
haven't
done
that.
So
now,
I've
just
talked
myself
in
a
circle,
because
until
we
have
that
I
think
we
should
just
have
them.
F
F
C
Yeah
I
think
you
don't
have
any
problem
explaining
that
as
part
of
the
bootstrap
right,
that's
a
lot
of
the
working
groups.
That's
the
way
they
started
out
is
like
whoever
showed
up
gets
in
gets
joined
and
only
once
you
sort
of
get
going
and
have
enough
momentum.
Do
you
really
need
to
make
it
any
more
formal
than
that
yeah.
F
A
Yeah,
but
that
sounds
good
to
me
and
I
totally
get
the
running
around
and
circles
on
this
because
the
other
there's
a
bit
of
a
chicken
and
egg
situation.
Yet
we
need
to
get
people
in
there
and
moving,
but
we
also
need
to
have
this
process
documented,
yeah
I
think
this
all
sounds
good
to
me
Jen.
What
do
you
think,
since
this
does
about
you.
B
A
Yeah
totally
I
think
that's
totally
fair
until
you
make
sense,
so
it
sounds
like
we
should
probably
go
ahead
and
add
the
two
of
you
for
now,
as
well
as
a
couple
other
people
too,
like
Olivia,
you
know
I
think
it
would
make
sense
to
add
you
as
well
and
Richard.
Are
you
a
member
yet
actually
can't
remember
I'm,
not
yes,
I,
like
you
know,
if
you
to
be
I,
think
that
would
make
sense
as
well,
and
we
could
maybe
what
do
people
think
about
this?
We
could
consider
like
sort
of
this
group.
A
F
F
D
F
C
A
F
B
A
Yep,
oh
boy,
alright!
So
next
up
we
have
a
issue
number
63.
This
is
move
the
note
together
repo
as
an
Oregon,
derp,
calm,
calm,
I
know
there
was
a
primary
quickly.
There
was
like
a
couple
of
just
things
that
we
needed
to
vet
from
the
foundation
side.
For
the
happen,
is
there
any
update
to
progress
up.
F
Let's
see
so
it
was
if
I,
that's
my
mistake,
if
I
didn't
put
it
in
I
need
to
put
it
in
the
issue
itself
and
not
just
words
in
a
meeting.
It
was
my
understanding
that
the
board
had
no
problem
with
it
and
didn't
seem
to
think
that
there
was
a
resolution
required
from
them.
F
A
F
A
Okay,
so
I
think
we
should
take
two
action
items
from
this
and
you
know
correct
me
if
I'm
non
triptans
correctly,
so
we
should
go
ahead
and
bring
in
a
note
together.
Now
there's
nothing
blocking
us.
We
just
need
to
do
the
actual
work
to
bring
in
that
repo
and
then
also
we
need
to
make
a
request
to
the
board.
So
this
would
be
something
to
do
through
Ashley
or
William
and
hat
and
have
them
request
at
the
board
request
legal
to
take
a
look
at
these
documents.
Is
that,
like
the
correct
action
items
that.
A
A
F
A
Okay,
that's
where
I
hope
not
now
cool
it
was
there
anything
else
with
this
one
that
we
need
to
handle
or
is
like
once
we
do,
these
two
things
were
done.
A
D
One
thing
that
I've
noticed-
and
this
isn't
meant
to
be
insult
to
anyone,
but
is
that,
for
example,
the
meeting
minutes
for
last
for
the
last
meeting,
like
maybe
this
meeting
two
meetings
ago,
have
come
up
like
three
days
ago,
which
is
I,
think
a
little
late,
I,
don't
know
I
can't
remember.
This
is
like
a
recurring
thing,
but
I
think
would
be
nice
to
have
them
on
time.
Maybe
like
one
day
later,
that.
B
I
interrupt
where
we
at
on
the
agenda,
and
is
this
related
to
it
I
think.
D
A
D
A
D
A
A
Okay,
so
you
might
just
create
a
bullet
for
like
this
is
just
a
new
agenda
item.
So
first,
with
regards
to
the
last
one,
I
think
I
submitted
the
last
two
or
three
minutes:
I
I,
don't
quite
remember,
but
yeah
I
was
late
on
this
one.
That's
that's
all
me
I
just
I
was
busy.
This
is
also
kind
of
one
of
those
gray
areas
where
we
don't
actually
have
this
sign
as
an
official
person
to
do
this,
I
can
continue
doing
it
I'm
fine.
With
that
we
could
also
have
whoever
takes
notes.
A
Do
it
I'm,
also
fine,
with
that
I
think
the
latter
might
make
a
little
more
sense
just
because
that
way
you
know,
since
you
in
this
kitchen,
you
actually
took
all
the
minutes
and
everything.
You
therefore
get.
The
collaborators
credit
it
might
be
contributor
says
things
like
that
on
github,
but
also
is
that
something
that
you
would
like
to
undertake.
A
D
A
So
like
actually,
ideally
what
we
could
should
probably
do
moving
forward
and
once
again
I
apologize
for
not
doing
that.
That's
that's
on
me.
We
should
submit
the
PR
pretty
much
right
up
to
the
meetings
done.
I've
never
really
gone
through
and
done
much
editing
prior
I,
just
kind
of
copy.
What
was
in
there?
Well
that.
F
And
that's
not
apologize
on
Maya
too
so
I'm
definitely
been
a
note-taker,
not
in
many
of
the
sessions,
and
it
just
did
not
occur
to
me
to
ask
who
should
be
doing
it.
I
think
I'd
done
it.
I
PR
did
a
while
back,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that
I
assumed
it
was
my
responsibility.
So
sorry
about
that,
I
could
have
checked
with
pride.
F
A
All
right,
so,
what's
going
to
move
on
to
number
46,
this
is
very,
very
similar
to
the
previous
on
a
request
to
move
nodejs
such
education
under
calm,
calm,
the
last
time
which
is
I,
think
we're
ready
to
do
this.
We
just
need
to
actually
do
it
is
that
correct,
I
believe.
A
A
Along
it's
not
just
for
the
note
for
everyone.
I've
been
working
with
the
evangelism
working
group,
it's
they're
most
likely
going
to
come
under
us.
The
working
group
signed
off
on
that
and
now
I'm
just
working
with
the
CTC
to
get
their
approval
thanks.
Oh
so,
then,
once
that
happens,
then
I'll
open
an
issue
for
calm
calm
in
which
we
get
all
of
us
to
talk
about
it
in
vote
on
it.
A
A
A
All
right,
so
the
last
one
is
issue
number
38,
adding
folks
is
numbers,
so
we
kind
of
talked
about
this
one
earlier.
You
know
in
reference
to
an
engine
and
tne,
so
we
have
an
action
item
for
now
to
go
and
get
people
added,
but
this
one
is
talking
about
like
what
should
that
process?
Actually
look
like
I'm?
Not?
Is
there
anything
we
want
to
talk
about
from
this
meeting,
yeah
I'm,
not
sure
if
we
actually
have
agenda
items
but
yeah.
F
A
All
right,
I
removed
the
agenda
labeled
from
that
one,
while
I'm
thinking
about
it.
Is
everyone
also,
okay
with
me,
removing
the
agenda
item
from
the
request
to
move
nodejs
education?
Since
you
know
we
have
action
items
and
they
just
at
this
point,
I,
don't
think,
there's
anything
else
for
us
discus.
A
F
Think
I
I
wanted
to
visit
like
customer
to
visit
the
idea
of
travel
fund
for
calm,
calm
because
I
think
like
in
terms
of,
if
you
think
about
scope,
it
is
separate
course
from
TSC
travel
fund
and
I.
Just
wasn't
sure
if
this
is
something
like
the
TSE
is
going
to
be
making
an
additional
allocation
request
for
their
travel
fund
for
the
rest
of
the
year
and
I
I
didn't
know
if
we
would
need
to
establish
a
separate,
calm,
calm
one
so
that
we
can
make
sure
we
can
get.
F
A
So,
a
little
bit
of
a
background
for
those,
if
you
aren't
aware
of
the
TSC,
does
have
a
travel
fund
that
they
can
use.
You
know
to
send
people
to
these
kinds
of
conferences.
It
is
approved
it's
given
up
by
the
board
and
it
the
way
this
is
typically
uses.
We
request
that
people
you
want
to
travel
like
if
they
work
for
a
company
that
is
a
member
of
the
nosiest
foundation.
So
this
is
like,
for
example,
Microsoft.
A
You
know
that
I
work,
for
if
they
work
for
a
member
company,
then
we
request
that
they
ask
their
company
to
pay
for
travel,
but
if
they
are
not
part
of
a
member
company,
then
we
will
pay
for
their
job
to
go
to
these
events,
so
that
will
cover
usually
like
airfare
flights
and
food
as
an
EP
I
really
want
to
get
as
many
people
and
as
possible.
Is
this?
That's
usually
the
purpose
is
to
get
people
to
collaborate
or
summit,
because
we
sit
beside
the
TSC
as
opposed
to
being
under
them.
A
F
I
just
I
like
the
idea
of
it,
because
it's
just
getting
more
people
to
like
what
I
see
is
like
the
most
valuable
contributor
meeting
you
know
of
the
year
and
for
us
to
be
able
to
also
it
would
be
really
neat
because
what
they
write,
what
the
TSE
uses
it
for
is
for
relevant
travel.
So
it's
not
just
like
note
interactive.
F
F
F
Cool
all
right,
well
yeah,
if
there
aren't
objections,
I'll
put
that
together,
I'm
actually
trying
to
dig
up
the
original
documentation
for
the
travel
fund,
so
that
I
can
just
PR
that
really
quick,
because
I
would
like
Ashley
and
William
if
we
can
get
it
to
be
able
to
request
the
allocation
next
week
at
the
board
meeting
and
it's
on
a
Tuesday
instead
of
a
Monday.
So
that
gives
us
a
little
more
time
because
otherwise
it's
just
wait.
It's
another
month
that
people
can't
be
planning
right
to
attend.
So
watch
out
for
that
PR
yeah.
A
Yeah
I
think
that
make
sense,
and
that
was
actually
about
state
exactly
that
yeah
keep
an
eye
out
for
notifications,
because
yeah
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
get
that
landed
as
soon
as
you
can
do.
We
need
to
have
a
discussion
around
amounts
or
anything
like
I.
Imagine
I'll
be
less
than
the
TSC
or
people,
but
with
the
evangelism
working
group.
A
Moving
in
that
is,
you
know
more
people,
and
also
I
want
to
say
that
yeah
these
katako,
what
tracy
said
these
collaborations
are
really
really
valuable
and
at
the
last
one,
and
we
actually
had
a
lot
of
compound
specific
discussions
with
those
who
were
able
to
be
there,
and
I
think
we
made
a
lot
of
good
progress
so
yeah.
I
definitely
encourage
everyone
here
to
attend
if
you
can
and
if
you're,
free
and
I've
yeah
well
we'll.
D
F
F
500
for
domestic
travel
and
thousand
are
a
little
bit
more
for
international
travel,
because
if
you
do
it
far
enough
ahead
of
time,
that
can
be
a
reasonable
number
and
because
it's
an
estimate
most
times
people
come
under
that
and
it's
totally
fine
I,
don't
think.
We've
ever
stretched
these
funds
to
their
limit.
F
So
then
you
just
have
to
be
careful
and
how
many
people
that
you're
estimating
and
then
we
also
include
you
know
I-
know
the
cost
of
the
hotels
in
the
area
for
Vancouver
and
the
place
that
we've
contracted
as
a
block
for
the
conference.
So
I'm
not
going
to
do
below
that,
because
I
don't
want
someone
to
have
to
be.
You
know
staying
in
a
hostel
because
we
went
too
low
with
the
estimate
and
then
like
the
number
of
days
right
so
yeah.
D
F
Go
yeah
yeah
and
if
so,
then
that
just
you
know
that
saves
money.
So
that's
nice,
it's
great
because
then
potentially
more
people
can
attend
and
I
thought
people
are
very
reasonable
when
it
comes
to
these
requests
right,
like
people
aren't
staying
at
five-star
resorts
and
flying
first-class
kits,
that
is
all
way
too
expensive.
I.
F
A
A
I
think
I
make
sense.
There
is
some
discussion
going
on
within
the
TSE
about
that
process,
though
it's
it
does
need
some
work,
so
I
think
we
can
definitely
improve
it.
So
I'm
just
kind
of
giving
a
little
bit
of
Orangeville
because
of
timing.
I
think
it
would
probably
be
prudent
to
go
and
bring
in
those
documents,
as
is
just
so.
We
have
something
oh
yeah,
then
we
can
talk
about
improving
them
later,
but
gives
giving
up.
You
know
there
will
be
some
like
weaknesses
and
things
you'll,
probably
see
in
them.
A
E
A
A
Yeah
I
seem
to
recall
from
the
stats
for
the
TSE
we
usually
get
like,
maybe
a
dozen
or
so
people
who
watch
them
I
mean.
Actually
we
have
seven
people
watching
right
now,
so
in
case
anyone's
curious,
oh
nice,
yeah,
so
mark
Hinkel,
the
executive
director
of
the
gnome
foundation
did
have
a
quick
question.
I
see
now,
do
you
have
an
idea?
Many
people,
you
think
you'd
need
to
fund
travel
to
Club
some
of
this
fall
bar
park.
So
we
kind
of
have
that
discussion
already,
and
we
can
also
continue
that
offline.
A
F
Yeah,
that's
a
good
point,
because
I
think
that
would
probably
be
the
first
thing
that
would
be
questioned
when
I
filed
at
PR
and
put
the
estimate
in
it's
going
to
be.
You
know
that
final
number
of
cost
times
how
many
people
so
do
we
want
to
look
so
what
I
did
for
collaboration
summit
was
look
at
the
total
attendance
and
then
did
you
know
like
a
modifier
I
was
like
I
expect,
50%
of
them
to
require
travel.
F
You
know
attendance
assistance,
and
that
was
how
we
did
that,
and
that
was
a
little
arbitrary
but
like
it
still
comes
out
to
a
pretty
healthy
figure,
and
we
didn't
use
that
last
year,
like
I
know
for
sure,
with
the
budget
that
we
had
like
what
we
hit
and
it
was
nowhere
near
there
so,
and
that
was
just
for
the
one.
F
So
it
was
a
pretty
easy
way
to
tell
like
not
between
two
summits,
so
yeah
we'll
definitely
want
to
look
at
like
maybe
how
many
members
of
evangelism
there
are
because
evangelism
is
pretty
active
and
we're
not
going
to
be
taking
on
as
far
as
I
could
tell
any
other
large
working
groups
and
then
the
people
who
are
existing
members.
A
Think
it
would
probably
be
wise
to
also
have
some
like
inflating
factor
on
top
of
it
just
because,
since
we
already
knew
I
think
it's
reasonable
to
assume
we'll
probably
grow
at
least
some
between
now
and
the
collaborator.
Sometimes
so
we
probably
have
some
Headroom
as
well.
For
you
know
new
people,
you
might
come
on.
Okay,.
F
Alright,
yeah,
no
that's
good
and
then
I
just
will
make
that
clear
in
the
calculations.
So
if
the
board
is
asking
for
that
breakdown
we'll
be
able
to
explain
that
because
they
could
potentially
come
back
with
us
and
say
like
they
don't
want
to
cover.
You
know
one
hundred
and
thirty
percent,
but
they're
happy
to
cover.
You
know
a
certain
amount.
A
A
July
sex.
Thank
you.
That's
what
I
get
for
that?
How
can
that
document
open
with
the
date
that
I
created
yeah?
So
thank
you,
everyone
for
joining
and
actually
okay,
so
I,
just
remember
to
a
point
earlier
trace
that
you
had
asked
about
the
way
we
get
things
added
to
agenda.
Is
we
tag
them
as
CC
agenda?
Anyone
who
has
the
permission
to
add
this
label
is
free
to
do
so,
and
if
you
don't
have
the
github
permissions
to
do
so,
then
you
can
ask
that
it
gets
added
and
we'll
add
it.
A
We
have
a
very,
but
we
don't
have
a
policy
on
this,
but
I
wanted
to
be
a
very
open
policy
that
anyone
can
suggest
things
be
added
to
the
agenda.
So
if
there's
anything
that
people
want
us
to
discuss
at
the
next
meeting,
please
feel
free
to
tag
it
as
cc
agenda
or
asking
a
thread
that
one
of
us,
you
guys
detail,
and
we
will
talk
to
you
next
time.
Thanks
hon
thanks.