►
From YouTube: Node.js Community Committee Meeting_June 13, 2019
Description
B
B
C
So
we're
gonna
start
the
mentorship
cohort
like
the
actual
mentorship
on
the
20th
next
week.
I
did
something
like
we
close:
the
applications
for
the
mentees
to
apply
just
yesterday
and
we're
giving
a
week
for
the
mentors
to
choose
their
top
five
mentees
and
after
that,
the
team
and
our
like
mentorship
working
group
will
choose
one
mentee
from
those
selections
for
each
mentor
and
the
reason
we're
doing
this
to
make
sure
that
we
have.
We
have
like
at
the
diverse
selection
and
it's
inclusive,
forelock
different
skill
levels
and
different
people
joining
as
mentees
great.
B
D
There
we
had
a
little
bit
of
a
chat,
I
think
the
key
things
to
call
out
as
it
sounds
like
Dan
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
think
he
said
that
specifically,
but
he's
you
know
in
terms
of
time
has
a
few
challenges
on
that
front.
We
did
talk.
He
did.
We
did
talk
a
bit
about.
You
know
different
areas
that
would
make
sense
to
focus
on
one.
D
B
And
and
on
that
note,
I
think
that
I'm
just
gonna
take
the
promises.
One
I
need
to
look
at
it
again.
It's
been
a
couple
of
months
actually
and
just
try
to
just
drive
that
one
forward
myself.
You
know:
we've
had
a
lot
of
progress
there
and
I'm
connected
with
some
of
the
folks
again.
So
I
may
just
take
the
the
baton
for
that
one
and
just
try
to
drive
it
forward
again,
but
as
a
sort
of
a
first
run
of
you
know
getting
having
a
process
for
surveys,
so
we
can
talk
about
that.
D
So
it's
yeah,
so
we
talked
I
mean
that
was
the
main
thing
like
we
needed
somebody
who's
driving
driving
them.
So
it
sounds
good
and
I
guess
we
did
talk
a
little
bit
about
they're.
Still,
you
know
the
the
meetups,
the
the
feed
user
feedback
that
the
meetups
it
sounds
like
there's
you
know
additional
ones
being
lined
up
and
so
forth.
So
that's
kind
of
ramping
up
probably
still
needs
a
bit
more
attention,
but
yeah.
B
I
am
connected
Tracy
with
a
gentleman
who's
involved
in
New
York
City
in
the
Austin
meetups,
and
he
seemed
kind
of
stuck
on
the
whole
like
how.
How
is
this
bringing
value
to
the
community?
You
know
and
he's
really
focused
on
quality
talks.
That's
you
know,
people
are
gonna
want
to
attend
and
he
wasn't
seeing
you
know
value
on
both
sides.
I
guess
Tracy
responded
to
him,
but
I
don't
know
if
he
really
what's
getting
it.
So
we
may.
B
D
E
I
think
something
also
discussed
in
the
user
feedback
team
or
how
we
could
not
duplicate
efforts
between
DOJ's
outreach
initiative-
and
you
know
jess-
is
a
feedback
initiative
for
user
feedback
sessions
such
a
way
that
we
want
to
create
a
link
between
the
outreach
initiative
on
the
idea
of
the
outreach
initiative.
Craziness.
That's
in
the
meter
herbs,
increasingly
the
kanuto
to
calm
account
and
the
reaching
also
folks,
that's
all
the
able
to
also
champion
readers
are
on
the
user
feedback
sessions.
I.
E
D
Yeah
I
think
the
the
discussion
of
overlap
was,
and
the
sessions
are
basically
one
thing
that
could
be
content
in
meetups,
so
sort
of,
like
the
the
whole
thing
of
helping
people
build,
meetups
or
set
up.
Meetups
is
a
larger
thing,
larger
effort
that
doesn't
really
overlap
other
than
the
user
feedback
sessions
could
be
one
potential
content
to
suggest
for
those.
B
B
A
A
Find
a
forum
just
fill
out.
You
know
they
kind
of
just
kind
of
walks
you
through
what
the
purpose
of
the
program
of
the
program
committee
is
and
and
what
the
requirements
are
and
what
the
commitment
would
be,
but
essentially
it's
just
an
opportunity
to
help
craft
that
agenda
and
make
sure
that
the
topics
that
are
important
that
community
are
being
represented
at
the
conference.
D
F
A
Believe
that
there
was
a
sort
of
a
call
for
participation
on
one
of
these
calls,
and
there
was
a
list
made
from
that
and
then
there's
also
a
form
happening.
So
if
you
haven't
submitted
on
the
form
I
would
just
I
would
just
go
and
submit
on
the
form
just
to
be
sure,
I'm
happy
to
dig
up
that
list,
because
I
know
that
there's
a
I
know
that
there
is
one.
My
concern
would
be
that
that
list
didn't
get
transferred.
All
into
that
form.
You
know
I
mean
right
and
that's
where
our.
A
D
G
As
far
as
I
remember
BC,
we
discussed
this
income
from
meetings
last
year
and
she
asked
if
anyone
from
the
quality
you
just
let
me
know
and
tell
me:
I
am
Michael
and
few
other
people
just
told
her.
Okay
and
she
said
like
no
don't
be
created
this
I,
don't
know
what
you
are.
There
was
only
communication,
I
think
happens
with
I.
Think.
A
D
F
A
B
B
Think
we're
good,
alright
great
well.
So
next
issue
is
allow
champions
to
be
calm,
calm,
regular
members,
not
just
voting
members.
This
is
issue
number
489
in
calm,
calm.
This
is
created
by
Adam
and
was
born
out
of
the
calm
calm
session
at
the
collapse
summit.
Both
Adam
and
Tierney
are
tagged
as
assignees,
and
neither
of
them
are
on
the
call.
So
does
anyone
want
to
give
some
context
here,
or
should
we
talk
about
it
when
they
are
on
the
call.
B
B
B
A
Kind
of
been
ongoing
here
for
a
while,
the
last
time
I
went
around
and
was
the
social
media
chair
blog
I
had
to
get
some
comments
around
that
things
to
maybe
check
out
which
have
been
noted,
and
then
the
plan
was
to
discuss
this
more
in
depth
at
the
collaborator
summit,
which
was
done,
it
was
really
good
conversations
and
I
love
these
partnership
on
that
he
helped
those
that
militate
that
that
going.
Thank
you
so
much
and
I
posted
some
notes.
A
A
A
One
of
the
recommendations
was
to
form
a
small
block
team
subcommittee
around
the
and
then
also
talk
about
what
you
know.
What
was
in
their
goal
today,
I
think
a
lot
of
this,
the
open
for
discussion,
and
maybe
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
get
to
it
in
this
meeting.
I
hope
you
don't
think
that
we
should.
You
know,
stop
progress
on
this.
If
we
recording
quotation
or
what
the
goal
should
be
I
mean
I,
think
there's
some
things
that
we
could
we
can
move
forward
with.
A
We
talked
about
incentives,
badges
and
stickers
seem
to
be
popular
with
the
group.
I
know
that
Menil
had
talked
about
no
js'.
Thank
you
program.
So
that's
something
we
can
kind
of
figure
out,
one
of
the
things
that
has
been
open
for
a
while
there's
his
work
towards
content,
but
this
is
just
kind
of
a
beta
and
the
discussion
at
that
collect
on
it
with
definitely
work
focused
on
content
versus
social.
A
G
A
A
You
know
to
everybody
who
is
either
contributing
or
participating.
What
exactly
is
you
know
what
exactly
the
process
I
you
know,
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
cut
some
light
on
what
it
looks
like
and
what
the
expectations
are
kind
of
across
the
board,
and
so
you
know
people
can
either
submit
a
you
an
idea
or
they
seem
submit
a
full
draft.
There's
two
different
ways
to
think
about
that.
G
A
H
A
Think
if
you
look
at
our
social
media
feeds
today
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
what
perform
as
well
or
what's
the
security
like
our
you
know,
open-ended
questions
and
I
came
out
of
that
was
look
at
plug.
It
asked
me
anything
which
I
know
that
they'll
actually
brought
up
in
a
different
meeting,
but
I
think
there's
some
cool
things
we
can
do
around.
You
know
using
Twitter
to
get
question
answers
around
the
project
once
you
know
how
to
get
started.
Things
like
that
I'm
just
going
to
kind
of
come
on
down
there
next
step.
A
So
for
next
step
for
the
collection,
I'm
looking
for
feedback,
/
approval
for
the
new
submission
or
review
process,
and
then
once
we
kind
of
get
that
in
a
place
where
everybody's
comfortable
I
can
get
that
up
on
on
github
and
update,
and
there
was
a
bridge
'''l
issue
when
this
kind
of
offers
kicked
off
and
then
also
if
there
are
other
ways
that
we
feel
like
we
could
bill.
Are
our
nodejs
collection
content
like
lines?
A
You
know
some
other
ideas
too,
and
then
that's
like
for
social
media.
If
folks
have
you
know
six
or
jumped
with
the
blog,
we
can
turn
them,
get
the
ball
rolling
on
that,
and
then
you
know
just
additional
ideas
to
get
social
content.
I
know
that
there
were
a
couple
of
recommendations
on
how
to
be
the
crowd
source
of
that.
If
you
wanna
explore
that
a
little
bit,
I'm
definitely
all
ears,
so
I'm
going
with
good
sorry,
no
I'm
saying
my
puppy
and
I
think
we
didn't
open
the
floor
for
discussion.
H
So
one
of
the
questions
I've
had
and
I
I,
don't
know
if
this
has
been
even
like
looked
into
you
I'm
curious
to
see
if
we
jaysene
you
know
outside
of
how
relevant
or
how
often
we're
posting,
if
we've
actually
seen
any
kind
of
drops
since
on
the
medium
content.
Since
there's
been
a
relative
move
away
from
media
in.
A
H
H
A
And
I
haven't
seen
a
noticeable
drop-off
in
any
of
our
analytics,
but
I
have
seen
and
to
drop.
Often
people
saying
things
but
I'm
just
not
sure
that,
because
we've
kind
of
been
having
this
conversation
for
a
while,
and
so
it's
not
like
the
whole
caller
contributor.
That
kind
of
thing
but
I'm
happy
to
take
a
look.
Okay,.
H
Another
question
I
have-
and
this
is
definitely
not
something
that
we
can
implement
now,
but
the
idea
of
effectively
sending
air
centralizing
this
content
on
the
nodejs
website
wants
the
new
website
launches,
which
is
not
in
that
close.
It's
not
a
closed
timeline.
It's
like
a
little
bit
of
a
longer
timeline,
but
centralizing
to
this
content
into
you
know
centralizing
the
process
of
this
and
be
actually
publishing
up
a
into
the
note
website
and
then
syndicating
it
out
from
there.
So
we're
actually
getting.
H
This
is
totally
like
a
growth
hacker
thing
to
mark
marketing
me
here,
but
that's
where
my
background
is
at
this
point
with
this
kind
of
content
stuff,
basically
centralizing
it
and
then
using
canonical
links.
So
we
could
actually
utilize
multiple
platforms
that
get
this
out
more
broadly,
rather
than
less
broadly
so
having
it
on
the
nude
website
and
then
using
mediums
import
tool
from
RSS
feeds
and
also
things
like
Deb
and
practical
dev
or
dev
is
the
official
name.
I
guess,
and
then
you
know
a
few
other
sources
as
well.
H
H
A
H
Yeah
and
there's
a
few
things
you
know
a
few
suggestions:
I
could
have
that
we
could
exploit
that
I'm.
It's
it's
a
little
bit
far
out,
but
I
definitely
did
want
to
get
that
on
the
radar
just
because
of
how
things
are
going
with
medium
I'm,
not
super
convinced
it's
a
long-term
sustainable
platform
for
technical
content,
so
I
just
want
to
go,
be
sure.
We're
we're
on
top
of
that
before
it
bites
us
I.
H
H
I
I
think
that's
a
good
idea
and
I
think
we
should
try
to
move
forward
with
that,
whether
it's
Trello
or
some
kind
of
air
table
thing
or
something
else,
just
something
that
works
that
allows
us
to
kind
of
visualize
this
and
also
make
it
public
as
far
as
public
as
possible.
Just
so,
people
can
also
kind
of
participate
and
engage
at
that
level.
That
would
be
good.
G
G
A
H
D
H
G
G
B
Because,
if
not,
we
skipped
over
something,
because
at
and
neither
Adam
nor
Tierney
were
here
and
we
can
double
back
on
that.
It
was
issue
number
489
and
calm
calm.
It's
allowed
champions
to
be
calm,
calm,
regular
members,
not
just
voting
members
emerge
from
calm,
calm
session
proposal
details
to
follow
up
her
Adam
Miller.
If
you
want
to
give
any
context
on
this
tyranny
and
theater,
should
we
just
save
it
for
next
time,
I'm.
H
Happy
to
give
some
context,
I
don't
know
if
there's
necessarily
an
update
but
context.
So
this
is
something
that
was
raised
at
the
con
comm
session
or
that
I
kind
of
throw
on
the
calendar
at
the
collaborative
hair
summit
and
one
of
the
I
believe
I'm.
The
one
who
raised
a
point,
although
I,
could
be
off
one
of
the
things
that
I
noticed
about
how
the
CPC
works
is
that
there's
the
voting,
membership
and
regular
membership?
That's
a
very
interesting
model.
It
doesn't
necessarily
lead
from
regular
membership
into
voting
membership.
H
So
that's
a
very
interesting
process
and
I
think
with
how
our
membership
process
is
currently
structured.
It
actually
fills
in
a
gap
for
us
our
membership
is
structured.
Right
now
is
somehow
from
strategic
initiatives.
People
can
be
selected
to
be.
Members
are
get
in
somehow
that
process
is
in
place,
there's
not
actually
a
bridge
from
okay.
I
am
this.
You
know
collaborator
on
a
teaching
issue
to
first
Richie
initiative.
I
am
now
a
comp
remember.
H
That
could
also
be
us
providing
a
path
to
kind
of
leveling
up
and,
as
such,
I
think
that
implementing
something
like
regular
membership
is
actually
a
smart
move
for
us,
because
it
allows
us
to
have
a
bridge
from
one
having
people
come
in
from
strategic
initiatives
and
contributing
that
way
and
then
participating
in
the
conquerer
meetings
in
that
way,
or
coming
in
to
calm,
calm
and
participating
in
that
way,
and
actually
making
significant
contributions
without
necessarily
being
a
voting
member.
It
also
takes
the
it
helps.
Lower
the
barrier
to
participating
in
actual
consensus.
H
I
know
that
there
are
there.
There
have
been
things
in
the
past
where
people
have
come
in
and
contributed
a
lot
and
not
been
able
to
kind
of
level
up
past
that
or
find
an
easy
way
with
that
I'm
talking
to
someone
101,
which
is
almost
of
what
I
did
when
I
was
chair
to
get
that
so
I
think
that
introducing
a
regular
membership,
tier
or
level
as
a
official
thing
income
could
be
a
good
approach
for
us
to
actually
enable
more
contribution,
more
more
collaboration.
H
D
You
have
no
way
to
get
them
in
necessarily
right
in
the
youth
of
the
calm
calm,
at
least
they
can
mean
anybody
can
be
nominated
if
they're,
making
the
contribution
and
get
in.
So
it's
it's
slightly
different
in
terms
of
like
that
problem,
but
right
so
I
did
having
another
way
that
we
invite
people
in
is
doesn't
mean
it's
not
to
say
that
that's
still
not
a
good
idea
is
what
I
want
to
say.
Yeah.
H
D
H
D
H
Yeah,
so
III
definitely
see
the
differences
there,
and
you
know
I
do
think
that
how
membership
has
progressed
since
we
implemented
this
kind
of
speaks
to
there
being
a
gap
there.
Whether
or
not
you
know,
regardless
of
the
source
I
think
we
have
identified
a
gap
in
how
we
get
involved.
Previously,
it
was
come
participate
in
the
meetings
which
was
like
a
relatively
low
barrier,
which
was
high.
We
implemented
what
we
did,
but
it
turns
out
what
we
implemented
is
a
relatively
high
barrier
that
prevents
people
from
basically
engaging
so
right.
D
H
D
Know
so
you
could
I'm
just
you
know,
thinking
like
through
those
things,
there's
there's
that
aspect
then
there's
the
the
participation
in
the
consents,
a
consent,
consensus
seeking
you
know.
If
you
want
to
invite
everybody
to
the
meeting.
Do
you
want
to
also
invite
everybody
to
participate
in
that
now,
implicitly,
by
being
there,
you
are
right,
but
whether
yeah
it's
it's
like
formally,
you
can
object
and
so
forth.
That's
kind
of
the
other
aspect,
yeah.
D
H
Think
it's
something
interesting
to
consider.
I,
don't
know
if
there's
something
we
can
finalize
on
it.
I
think
we
may
want
to
have
another
discussion
about
it
greater
depth,
but
it's-
and
you
know
also
it
won't-
take
us
like
what
eight
months
this
time
to
get
a
change.
Does
the
CPC
exist
there
they're
the
ones
who
will
approve
this
kind
of
turn
to
change?
So
that's
good.
G
H
You
know
if
we
do
want
to
get
on
this
path
or
any
other
path.
I
should
be
explicit.
This
isn't
like
the
only
path.
I
do
think
that
there
are
things
we
need
to
address
in
getting
more
people
involved
it's
hard,
but
I
do
think
that
this
is
something
we
should
be
digging
into
a
bit
more,
especially
like
you
know,
we
are
not.
H
B
D
I
think
like
tyranny.
If
he
wanted
to
make
a
proposal,
that's
a
good
way
to
get.
The
discussion
started
right,
yep.
Yes,
I
hos.
We
and
we
add
this
new
type
of
member
or
here's.
You
know
maybe
I
think
the
few
things
we
talked
about
are
the
key
things
to
sort
of
put
your
thoughts
to
then
everybody
can
say
it's
something
concrete
and
written
down
and
we'll
get
people
thinking.
Yeah.