►
From YouTube: Node.js Community Committee - 2020-06-11
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
A
I
don't
currently
have
a
session.
I
could
be
interested
in
that
okay.
B
B
There
is
the
I'll
just
say
real
quickly
in
the
format.
The
loose
format
I
think
you'd
say
is
day.
1,
which
is
Monday,
is
more
focused
on
new
contributors
day
2,
which
is
actually
Thursday,
because
the
event
opened
Reyes
world
is
Tuesday
and
Wednesday.
So
collaborators
summit
continues
on
Thursday
day
to
Thursday
is
like
project
focused
sessions
and
then
day
3
is
the
idea
is
that
sessions
on
that
day
would
be
sessions
that
would
benefit.
C
B
B
I
have
a
couple
I,
don't
know
why
I
feel
compelled
to
mention
user
feedback.
I
mean
I,
guess
it
was
in
node
before,
but
we
have
a
user
feedback
survey
request
from
node,
so
I'm
crazy
busy
at
the
moment,
I'm
hoping
to
make
some
progress
on
it
before
open
J's
world,
but
regardless
I'll
try
and
get
some
work
done
on
that,
not
necessarily
a
calm,
calm,
initiative
anymore,
but
I
always
feel
compelled
to
mention
it
and
then
the
cross
project
Council.
You
know
we
meet
weekly.
B
We've
been
continuing
to
make
progress
on
code
of
conduct
process,
although
I
think
there
are
a
couple
of
things
that
are
outstanding
there,
that
we
really
need
to
focus
on
I
know
Tierney.
You
are
involved
in
one
of
the
conversations,
but
we're
continuing
to
flesh
out
what
code
of
conduct
process
means
at
the
open
Jas
level.
You
know
kind
of
a
level
above
the
projects
and
we
were
careful
to
not
overstep
any
boundaries.
B
So
that's
something
we're
focused
on
I'm
trying
to
think
of
what
else
from
the
agenda.
Oh,
that
the
chairperson
election
is
technically
in
process.
I
was
the
only
person
to
nominate
so
unless
there
are
any
objections,
I
think
I'll
continue
in
that
role,
we're
working
on
what
the
board
seats
look
like
and
some
context
really
briefly,
is
that
we
have
three
kind
of
quote-unquote
community
like
board
seats.
One
is
the
CPC
director.
B
One
is
more
like
a
community
seats
that
node
was
given
for
the
first
year
and
the
idea
was
that
we
would
see
what
happens
in
the
second
year
and
that's
what
we're
doing
right
now,
we're
trying
to
figure
out
what
that
second
seat
looks
like.
There
is
a
third
seat
that
is
attached
to
the
individual
membership
program,
which
is
actually
Sara.
Chipps,
has
kind
of
taken
the
baton
on
that
and
helping
drive
some
progress
on
that
effort.
B
A
B
Yes,
yep
so
we'll
see,
we
have
three
like
essentially
community
board
seats,
we're
kind
of
figuring
out
what
all
three
of
them
really
look
like
right
now,
because
there's
an
election
expected
in
July.
So
we
need
to
hurry
up
and
get
that
sorted
out
and
I'll
say
to
that
right
now
this
week
I
am
kind
of
privately
collecting
interested
names
and-
and
the
thought
here
is
that
we
could
spend
a
lot
of
time
bike
shedding
like
what
would
be
the
perfect
ideal
situation
for
these
seats.
B
But
if
we
only
really
have
like
a
couple
of
interested
parties,
then
maybe
we
don't
need
to
bike
shed
at
all
right
now
and
we
can
kind
of
figure
out
what's
a
good
solution
and
then
continue
to
work
on
it,
so
I'm
sensitive
to
do
that
in
a
way
that
is
as
public
as
possible
and
to
you
know,
make
sure
that
you
know
there's
no
appearance
of
gaming,
the
system
or
what-have-you
I'm
very
sensitive
to
that.
So
that's
kind
of
I,
guess
the
gist
of
things
and,
of
course,
open.
B
B
B
A
Just
I
guess
one
thing
I
want
is
sure:
I
don't
have
any
explicit
updates
from
the
examples
initiatives,
but
if
folks
are
interested
in
contributing
examples
that
go
beyond
you
know
hello
world,
but
are
kind
of
prior
to
connecting
every
service
that
a
any
kind
of
quad
host
offers
imaginable.
Let
me
know
and
I'm
happy
to
help
aboard
you
into
examples
and
help
kind
of
get
and
get
any
examples.
You'd
be
interesting
tripping
in
so
we
can
have
begin
flushing
that
out
a
bit
more.
B
Before
you
jump
to
that,
I'll
ask
the
same
question
that
I
asked
them
David.
Do
you
have
any
interest
in
collab
summit
session?
It
might
be
something
you
could
promote,
that
the
folks
might
be
interested
in
coming
and
writing
some
examples
and
having
a
couple
of
mentors
there
to
help
them
through
any
of
the
process.
They're.
A
C
One
thing
I
did
want
to
bring
up
about.
You
know.
Since
we
talked
about
her
the
open
road,
you
know
the
meet
the
event
that's
coming
up,
so
we
did
discuss
about
that
last
week.
The
redesign
meetings-
you
know,
don't
when
you,
when
you
did,
we
did
have
an
internal
discussion
and
me
and
Ben
really
think
that
we
really
wanted
to
do
something.
C
So
when
we
have
a
meeting
next
week,
you
know
we
probably
try
to
get
something
going
to
be
able
to
give
you
guys
something,
but
I
can't
guarantee
anything,
because
it's
also
based
on
sama
and
brand
and
my
availability
and
these
past
week
this
week,
just
work
has
been
really
bombarded.
I
mean
I'm
imparted
at
work
this
week,
but
I
really
really
am
hoping
to.
C
B
So
that's
awesome
and
I
was
mentioning
earlier.
I
think
the
things
can
be
flexible
and
we
can
kind
of
slot
something
in
somewhere,
even
if
it's
last-minute
so
definitely
work
towards
it.
Keep
you
posted
and
that's
good
I.
Think
Tierney
was
going
to
update
on
moderation,
but
I'll
just
say
to
be.
You
know
if
you
have
any
more
updates
from
website
redesign
yeah.
C
I
do
have
so
this
past
couple
weeks
have
been
slow
in
terms
of
getting
features
and
working
on
issues,
because
everybody
is
trying
to
work
around
their
schedule.
Also
really
trainee.
I
know
that
you
didn't
have
time
last
week,
but
we
were
really
hoping
that
you
could
join
one
of
our
meetings
so
that
you
could
get
the
insight
on
the
redesign
stuff
that
we
did.
You
did
discuss
last
week,
I'd
meet
a
decent
meeting
that
you
were
bringing
up
and
I
thought
those
were
great
points
and
I.
C
C
Also
just
and
there's
no
concise
structure,
so
I
think
that
we
do
need
someone
to
come
and
just
say:
okay,
I
think
this
is
how
we
should
do
it,
and
this
is
what
we
should
follow,
because
me
penance.
Although
I
did
it
was
just
three
or
four.
Last
weekend
we
had
a
really
good
discussion
about
design
and
things
like
that
and
we
did
I-
did
bring
up
all
the
points
I
saw.
Also
did
you
know
that
you
had
mentioned
and
then
agreed
on
all
of
them
and
we
just
want.
C
Like
you
know,
you
know
the
requirements
of
the
specifications
because
I
don't
want
to
I,
don't
want
to
start
something
and
finish
it
and
then
there's
like
okay.
We
need
to
re-evaluate
this
and
we
change
things
and
also
I.
Don't
I
don't
want
to
do
that,
because
it's
just
more
work
on
my
own
and
I'm,
really
trying
to
like
break
break
down
from
work
to
remove
time
from
my
work
to
actually
put
into
work,
so
I
really
want
to
make
sure
it's
quality
and
it's
up
to
the
standards
that
we
have
set
for
ourselves.
A
D
C
We
didn't
have,
we
didn't
feel
those
were
enough
enough
votes
to
make
a
decision,
because
we
were
like
okay
and
the
four
people
were
me.
It
was
me
Salah
and
Ben
were
the
three
and
then
we
had
we
had
one
other
person
that
had
voted
on
it,
but
we
felt
that
if
you're
going
to
have
a
more
inclusive
group,
we
need
at
least
at
least
for
at
least
10
people
to
vote
on
it.
So
that
way
we
are
have
make
a
decision
on
the
basis.
C
A
Yeah
so
I
I
will,
in
that
case,
I'll
try
to
join
next
week
at
that
the
plan
time
and
if
it
changes,
I've
also
tried
remark
yeah,
so
I
will
I
will
do
my
best
at
that
to
make
it
in,
and
you
know,
I'm
happy
to
chat
there.
I'm
mostly
happy
happy
to
chat,
asynchronously
or
I'll
call
if
folks
have
questioned
and
if
I'm
available
like
on
a
one-off
call
cool
yeah,
any
kind
of
additional
feedback
or
thoughts
on
the
website
stuff.
So.
A
C
D
C
Adam
had
suggested
that
he
was
going
to
provide
us
with.
You
know:
new
icons
for
the
page,
we're
still
waiting
on
that.
We
did
reply
back
to
him
in
the
issue
saying
that
hey
Ben
did
he
said
that
hey
Adam?
Do
you
have
anything
or
any
updates,
but
we
still
haven't
caught
or
anything,
also,
there's
like
some
issues
with
coloring
that
we
are
not
sure
of
that
people
have
been
complaining
about.
C
C
We're
really
hoping
that
you
know
that
we
can
get
something
going,
so
we
also
have
something
to
show
at
the
at
the
event,
not
only
that
you
can
also
get
people
excited
and
try
and
get
them
involved,
because
we're
thinking
about
doing
a
small
workshop
kind
of
scenario
where
we
bring
up,
we
bring
up
things
and
we
ask
people
to
like
look
at
it
and
you
know
try
to
do
it
and
things
like
that.
That's
what
we're
thinking
well
yeah!
That's
all
I've
got
awesome.
A
Cool
with
that
I
think
I
can
just
share
the
moderation
update
real
quick,
let's
see
so
we
walked
easier
for
spam.
That's
in
moderation,
issues
before
3:00
Buffy's
are
from
the
Gator
channel
for
an
offensive
topic,
chat
or
events
of
October
chat,
which
that
is
something
that
I
think
we
should
probably
bring
up
an
admin
of.
Why
do
we
have
getter
and
should
we
shut
it
down?
I
didn't
realize
that
was
the
thing.
A
The
admin
I
think
some
other
people
also
didn't
realize
that
I
also
just
want
to
say
that
you
know
if
you're,
a
compa
member
or
other
otherwise
a
collaborator.
Please
look
at
the
moderation
issue.
Three,
four
seven
there's
a
lot
there.
I'm
not
gonna,
go
over
it
all,
but
I
will
I
will
paste
it
in
the
chat
feel
free
to
take
a
look
at
all
of
the
things
that
have
come
up
that
this
is
specifically
referring
to
the
change
on
the
website
and
instead
of
doing
a
single
issue.
A
This
is
a
massive
issue,
see
yeah,
there's
that
and
then
we
bought
an
additional
unit
for
spam.
That's
a
human
and
what's
the
ultimate
form,
early
block
user,
which
is
a
sheep
in
32,
so
I've
got
some
modern
update.
I
will
mark
it
that
we
have
updated
from
their
part
of
what
was
supposed
to
do
and
should
be
good
to
go
cool.
A
A
A
This
is
just
kind
of
changing
power,
approaching
the
Vanaja
discs
collection,
medium
thing,
which
has
not
been
actively
used
outside
of
one
not
super
actively
used
outside
of
one
group
that
was
kind
of
sharing,
so
they're
at
their
content
on
it
and
so
yeah.
This
is
just
a
bit
proposed
update
to
that
and.
E
Would
be
your
plus
one?
A
feedback
I
suggested
two
steps,
so
maybe
that
would
be
good
if,
like
do
next
steps,
which
one
should
we
go,
should
do
we
keep
initiative
alive
and
just
like
some
people,
moon
iterator,
or
do
we
move
the
initiative
to
move
the
repo
and
try
to
manage
the
people
who
are
reviewing
and
maintaining
the
maintaining
the
medium
account
as
part
of
maybe
the
social,
the
other
initiative
we
have
so
yeah?
We
will
have
to
decide.
How
do
we
want
to
go
forward?
I.
A
B
We-
and
forgive
me
if
this
has
already
been
discussed.
I
know
this
is
kind
of
this
topic
has
been
around
a
little
bit.
Do.
Are
we
open
to
like
any
support
from
the
foundation
or
anything.
A
A
E
B
B
I
asked
partly
because
a
colleague
that
I
work
with
that
IBM
she's,
going
to
start
attending
with
the
marketing
meetings
and
she's
currently
like
an
open
source
editor
for
IBM
content,
and
you
know
she
may
be
able
to
dedicate
a
little
bit
of
time
to
help
with
any
editing
and
I
might
be
able
to
get
some
reviewers
on
a
regular
basis
from
IBM.
You
know
we
have
a
bunch
of
contributors
and
PSC
members,
but
also
you
know
a
node
channel.
B
E
Someone
taking
the
responsibility
of
like
handling
everyone
once
we
repair
the
reviewing
part
would
not.
That
must
be
a
work.
We
can
paint
people
to
do
that
stuff,
but
previously
zippy
was
doing
a
lot
of
that
like
managing
taking
the
ownership
and
then
pinging.
So
some
people
who
just
do
the
reviews
part
but
right
now,
I
personally,
don't
have
the
capacity
or
anything
maybe
Danny
also
don't
have
the
capacity
the
whole
thing
and
then
let
other
people
just
do
the
review
more.
E
So
if
we
can
get
someone
who
can
who
can
manage
and
take
the
ownership
of
whole
thing,
I
don't
think
I
have
like.
We
have
a
problem
with
maintaining
it
as
an
open
to
submit
from
anyone,
and
then
we
can
keep
doing
the
reviews
from
from
collaborators
from
other
peoples,
but
yeah
we
either.
We
need
someone
to
take,
take
the
ownership
or
we
have
to
just
like
pause
it
or
put
it
on
just
use
it
internally
for
not
yes,
yeah.
So.
A
One
of
the
things
that
this
is
the
kind
of
situation
we're
in
here
is
something
that
you
know,
at
least
in
my
work,
something
that's
happening
with
us,
which
is
like
we.
We
had
a
media
publication
and
we
did
have
a
lot
of
process
around
it
and
that
process
kind
of
was
too
burdensome
to
be
able
to
effectively
ship.
Often,
like
you
know,
someone's
writing
in
content.
A
It
took
a
lot
of
additional
work.
Did
you
get
that
content
out
regardless
of
the
quality
of
the
content,
and
so
something
you
know
we
ended
up
doing
was
taking
you
know,
creating
a
damn
to
account
our
depth
to
organization
and
publishing
there
and
changing
how
we
were
doing
things
are
not
necessarily
accepting
external
contributions,
but
at
like
you
know,
the
people
who
are
interested
in
publishing
stuff
have
access
that
are
trusted
to
publish
stuff
and
are
trusted.
A
So
that
might
be
something
we
want
we
would
want
to
consider
is:
is
one
shifting
platform
into
shifting
how
we
approach
this
of
having
people?
You
know
if
someone
in
the
project
expresses
an
interest
in
saying,
hey,
I
want
to
write
articles
or
content
about
node
cool,
you
can
do
that.
We
will
add
you
to
be
or
your
here's
the
key
to
join
the
or
feel
free
to
publish.
We
trust
you
and
kind
of
go
from
there.
A
I
also
think
that
you
know
if
we
approached
it
in
that
way,
you
might
make
sense
to
have
it
be
an
admin
structure
similar
to
moderation
and
social
in
that
way
of
like
yes,
you
are
a
trusted
person,
I
I
think
the
bar,
for
that
would
be
lower
of
like
you're
writing
a
blog
post
rather
than
like
you
know,
tweeting
to
600,000
people,
or
you
know,
rather
than
banning
people
into
word.
So
it
is,
you
know
slightly
different,
but
I
think
that
potentially,
that
model
could
be
effective
and
bring.
A
B
A
E
B
F
Basically,
right
I
kind
of
ague,
it's
their
training
on
trying
to
find
a
way
around,
making
it
a
little
bit
public
and
allowing
other
people
to
come
on
board
and
contribute
I,
don't
know
if
any
of
you
can
remember
how
allocate
so
I
did
theirs,
so
they
actually
on
board.
Anybody
was
interest
to
write
for
them
and
the
process
of
writing.
It
helps
in
few
editors
will
go
over
and
basically
the
other
communities
or
technical
writers
or
parties,
or
they
or
putting
the
ideas,
and
so
Kate
encourage
these
concur.
F
It
does
and
once
it's
matched
it's
actually
reflects
honor
on
their
site.
So
I
think
we
can
actually
adopt
that
process
of
trying
to
make
it
elite
to
be
open
only
to
express
interest.
That
I
would
love
to
write
on
this
and
you
can
easily
open
a
PR
or
something
you
don't
code
there
or
every
other
person
responds
with
the
community,
can
good
through
it
and
suggest
some
changes
or
though
we
it's
a
lot
of,
and
we
shouldn't
make
edits.
F
B
B
Anyone
can
create
a
PR
to
submit
a
blog
post
and
do
the
typical
flow
that
most
of
us,
you
know
developers
work
through
and
github
comments
and
pull
requests
and
suggestions
more,
not
and
then
you
know
once
it's
approved
then
like
cross
post
it
to
dev
to
you
and
I
guess,
I
asking
this
question
I'd
like
to
know.
Turning
of
this
is
that
what
you
all
do
with
your
dev,
to
blog
ready
just
to
come,
and
do
it
straight
up
and
up?
B
A
Done
like
canonical
URLs
and
making
that
easy,
so,
like
you
know,
one
potential
thing
there
is
like
you
know
have
marked
out,
have
an
action
that
converts
it
to
an
RSS
feed.
You
publish
in
the
repo
like
a
feed
that
you
publish
there,
you
go
it's
just
XML
that
looks
like
art,
sent
us
and
then
have
it,
pull
and
pull
that
into
that.
Up
to
that,
that
would
be
one
of
the
way
to
do
it.
They
also
have
an
API,
but
generally,
how
most
folks,
you
know
in
our
do.
B
A
Like
there's
also
one
thing
there
where
it's
like,
you
know
one
of
the
things
that
really
come
on
things
that
Traci
Heights
brought
a
lot
was
github,
it's
not
always
the
most
welcoming
or
inclusive
space,
not
necessary,
because
the
people
or
the
project
and
how
we
approach
things,
although
that
can
certainly
contribute
to
it,
no
more
because
github
can
be
a
huge
barrier.
So
having
I
think
automating
from
github
is
a
great
idea,
I
think
also
having
additional
pads
to
doing
that
is.
A
B
B
Yeah
so
interesting,
I
mean
I,
think
I
think,
like
a
Content
team
would
be
awesome,
I
think
figuring
out
some
sort
of
process,
that
is
it's
frictionless
and
as
welcoming
as
possible,
would
be
awesome
and
trying
to
bring
more
people
into
the
fold
would
be
awesome.
You
know
I
think
that
this
is
potentially
another
opportunity
for
bringing
in
folks
that
are
in
the
community.
A
A
A
Agenda
item
is
know
just
that:
good
marketing
tips
for
home,
page
I
believe
this
is
just
a
holdover
from
the
previous
discussion
and
I.
Have
the
action
item
to
get
feedback
on
this
I
have
not
had
time
nor
energy
very
frankly
to
be
able
to
do
that
recently
in
the
past.
You
know
we
could
do
for
reasons
that
are
potentially
obvious,
but
I'm
happy
to
kind
of
help
with
that
and
if
other
folks
want
to
come
in
and
jump
on,
this
definitely.
A
A
D
We
just
meet
true
it's
because
we
have
that
we
have
been
and
Ally
DV
and
minuite
true
to
bring
everyone
to
make
educational
and
make
sure
we
are
all
in
agreement
with
with
with
what
we're
going
to
put
inside
the
home
page,
so
basically
need
to
make
calendar
points
to
everyone,
attend
and
address
all
doubts
and
make
sure
we
are
all
in
agreement.
Basically
I.
A
Think
I
would
recommend
that
we
do
that
async
rather
than
in
a
calendar
event
want
to
be
a
little
bit
more
just
inclusive
in
how
you
approach
that
and
to
just
I
I,
don't
necessarily
know
account
like
taking
an
hour
would
be
the
most
effective
use
of
everyone's
time.
For
that
I
think
proposing
something
and
iterating
on
it
or
having
both
people
proposed.
Then
collaborate
on
that
I
think
would
probably
be
a
slightly
more
effective
approach
and
I'm
happy
to
help
with
that.
D
B
D
Can
answer
that?
Basically,
we
are
trying
to
put
all
the
other
pages,
all
the
views
that
we
have
in
the
figma
inside
the
deploying
stage
and
further
in
the
production.
So
basically
we
are
going
to
to
deploy
that
and
continuum
is
maintained
and
updated,
be
great
great.
A
new
release,
reef
fixes
and
improvements,
basically,
is
going
to
be
that
at
first.
D
D
D
Mean
those
true
those
true
those
true
views
which
is
because
they
trod
the
fields
that
we
already
have
they're
rarely
deployed
so
learn
is
working.
We
have
a
scratch
home,
but
we
are
improving,
but
basically
there.
These
are
all
the
views
that
we
have.
So
you
know.
So
it's
it's
a
simple
site.
So
it's
okay,
but
they
are
they
to
point
the
staging
or
they
deployed.
A
D
Only
thing
that
you
have
in
production
is
the
home
site:
that's
not
a
complete
home
site,
so
the
other
links
are
pointed
to
the
nodejs.
The
target
instead
of
the
new
template,
the
load
pages,
is
the
one
I'm
work
with
the
last
meeting
that
we
had
with
Nijs
website
redesign
I
had
adapt
in
which
in
how
to
get
the
information
about
the
new
release
and
stable
and
those
kind
of
stuff
that
points
to
the
future.