►
Description
B
B
Pr
number
1
to
4
4
to
that
people
interested
in
promises
might
want
to
look
at
don't
Justin,
test
failures
and
async
hooks
on
boarded
hyung,
cremes,
David,
KY
and
the
other
on
a
light.
I
I
started
onboarding
and
then
I
had
to
leave
so
it
isn't
jumped
in.
So
thank
you
honor
for
that
got
more
involved
in
reviewing
and
contributing
to
the
napi
C++
proper
she's
gonna
be
traveling
over
the
next
couple
days.
I
take
or
something
or
otherwise,
just
might
be
slow
to
reply
doesn't
actually
say
why.
C
Yeah
I
started
talking
to
realize
it:
okay,
so
occasionally
last
week,
catching
up
on
PRS
since
then
working
on
cleaning
up
baby
to
stuff
the
kind
of
the
next
round,
we're
looking
at
opening
the
pr
against
master
engine
and
then
work
on
the
800
release,
testing
a
variety
of
different
forms
and
local
system
testing.
That
kind
of
thing
next
is
Michael,
so.
E
We
had
a
after
we
landed
in
API
Maine
Pyaar.
We
had
a
backlog
of
a
few
PRS
tool
and
so
helping
to
review
land,
those
in
the
main
repo
working
on
any
API
documentation,
starting
to
look
at
bring
on
as
us
machine
into
our
CI
I'm
salinas,
AIX,
dis
issues
and
then
just
the
general
rubinyan
landing.
Next
is
brian
white.
B
Sorry
I
was
on
yeah
Brian's
on
here,
so
I'll
just
read
it
off
you
work
on
various
optimization
or
he
submitted
a
few
other
missile
aprs
and
work
out
a
way
to
more
easily
check
for
permanent
d.
Optimizations
excuse
me
function
is
accord
or
using
the
test
suite.
So
that's
kind
of
exciting
and
next
is
miles.
F
Howdy,
so
this
week
was
not
incredibly
eventful,
but
some
things
went
on.
We
have
an
RC
4
for
8,
3
and
6
10
3
I
would
actually
really
appreciate
it.
People
could
pop
their
heads
in
and
take
a
quick
look
at
the
483
proposal.
This
is
indeed
a
maintenance
proposal,
but,
as
I
was
going
through
an
auditing
things
for
six
they're,
actually
quite
a
things
quite
a
few
bugs
in
odds
and
ends
that
came
up
that
I
thought
might
be
worth
back
boarding.
F
Obviously
this
is
our
first
maintenance
first
like
set
of
like
maintenance
release
is
outside
of
0
10
and
0
12,
and
it's
starting
to
feel
like
maintenance,
maybe
a
little
bit
more
active
than
we're
looking
for.
If
we
do
things
this
way,
A
or
B,
maybe
we
just
found
a
whole
bunch
of
new
books,
but
if
people
could
go
in
and
take
a
look
and
see
if
they
think
doing
this
release
is
reasonable.
I'd
really
appreciate
it.
We
had
the
first
back
boarding
team
meeting.
F
B
B
B
E
B
B
Getting
it
all
squared
away
before
the
80
released,
but
since
the
80s
a
release
has
been
pushed
out,
this
is
now
less
urgent
and
Josh
suggested
that
it
would
probably
okay
to
just
push
this
off
to
next
week
when
he
can
be
here
and
sort
of
frame
the
discussion
and
whatnot.
Does
anybody
object
to
that.
B
We
discuss
the
dash
dash
instead
stuff
that
I'm
asking
they
might
object
the
pushing
off
the
next
week.
It
originally
was
put
on
the
agenda
because
of
you
know
it
was
deemed
time
critical
because
it
had
to
be
squared
away
before
the
eight
dot
zero
release.
But
now
that
the
Adagio
release
is
being
pushed
out,
it's
less
time
critical
and
they
can
wait
a
week
when
Josh
can
be
here.
For
the
conversation.
B
C
Just
really
quick
I
know
not.
Everybody
is
happy,
but
I'm,
not
particularly
happy
about
moving
the
date
out,
but
the
consensus
vote
on
it
was
to
push
the
release
date
for
800
out
and
is
now
scheduled
for
May
thirtieth,
be
intent
is
to
land
v8
58
with
the
unfold,
a
crankshaft
and
the
old
compiler
by
default.
C
C
C
The
one
the
one
comment,
I
will
say
is
when
we
ran
a
canary
in
the
gold
mine
on
eight.
We
did
notice
that
there
were
a
higher
number
of
regressions
that
are.
We
still
need
to
investigate
and
I
will
be
taking
some
time
this
week
to
investigate.
I
would
really
appreciate
it,
though,
if
everyone
could
just
do
some
extra
testing
on
on
eight
and
just
master
in
general,
just
to
make
sure
that
we
can
identify
with
these.
The
questions
are.
F
Yeah
I
can
just
chime
in
there
really
quickly.
It
seems
like
a
bunch
of
stuff
has
been
landing
with
that
canary
in
the
gold
mine.
I
also
think
it
may
be,
and
I'll
own
it
a
little
bit,
but
it
shouldn't
just
be
my
job.
I
would,
in
the
past,
spend
time
periodically
just
doing
audits
of
master,
which
I
have
not
had
time
to
do
lately.
So
perhaps
we
can
maybe
set
up
some
sort
of
job
or
some
sort
of
consistent
thing
where
we're
checking
master
for
regressions
with
canary
in
the
gold
mine.
B
You
might,
as
you
may
or
may
not
know
miles,
there's
a
node
daily
master
job
that
runs
see
I
against
current
master
once
a
day
and
I
don't
know
if
this
has
been
brought
up
with
a
pill
grip
or
not,
but
you
know,
maybe
it
makes
sense
to
have
like
a
weekly
cyd
converse
with
the
canary
the
gold
mine
run
or
something
like
that.
I've,
no
idea
that
just
feasible.
B
A
Think
for
most
of
us,
like
unless
you're
involved
come
or
with
sich,
it's
oftentimes
very
hard
to
read.
Rather
whether
the
results
are
like
flaky
results
or
actual
failures
or
kind
of
decipher
what
those
are
and
then
I
put.
Maybe
that's
changed,
I'm
not
sure,
but
that
was
kind
of
my
experience
with
them.
So.
F
We're
pretty,
on
top
of
like
marking
things
flaky
that
are
flaky
and
I
mean.
Realistically.
If,
if
you
at
me
and
asked
me
to
look
at
things,
I
should
generally
be
able
to
respond
within
24
hours
and,
if
I'm
not,
and
then
you
like
ping
me
on
IRC,
I
definitely
will
but
we're
like
trying
to
stay
on
top
of.
F
F
E
C
There
are
some
things
in
there
that
are
somewhat
perpetually
red,
not
because
of
no
book
there's
some
something
that's
failing
in
those
in
those
modules.
It'd
be
really
interesting.
You
know,
I,
think
it'd
be
beneficial
for
us
to
have
another
status
for
those
things
that
we
know
are
already
broken
so
that
when
we
do
a
new,
a
new
run
right.
F
B
B
Help,
okay,
so
sakkri
on
that
hi
welcome
and
I
see.
Colin
joined
us
as
well,
so
that's
cool.
The
the
one
final
piece
I
would
bring
up
a
list.
We
want
to
talk
a
little
s.
Anybody
has
anything
else
to
say
on
the
version
8
with
a
state
/
marrying
the
gold
mine
stuff,
which
I'll
just
stop
for
a
second
to
let
someone
say
something
that
they
won't
cool.
B
So
the
one
other
thing
I
want
to
bring
up
is
rod,
sent
an
email
indicating
that
he
was
turning
over
basically
chairing
the
least
agree.
I
want
to,
and
I
want
to.
Our
governance
indicates
that
the
meeting
chair
should
be
selected
by
the
CTC,
so
I
want
to
at
least
throw
out
there
that
if
anybody
thinks
we
should.
E
B
No
I
think
I
think
is.
That
is
that,
if
nobody
objects
to
just
me
taking
it
on,
then
great
I'm
just
going
to
take
it
on
I
want
to
just
throw
out
there
that
if
anybody
at
all
objects,
then
we
should
go
through
the
proper.
You
should
definitely
go
through
the
process.
So
if
anybody
has
an
objection,
they
should
voice
it.
You
know
in
email
or
here
or
something
that's
all
I
want
to
say.
B
A
B
I,
I
recommend
anybody
who's
thinking.
Maybe
they
would
too
please
review
the
wiki
page.
We
have
about
what
about
setting
up
meetings
first
and
he
trying
to
do
that
because
it's
it
gets
tedious
fast,
but
anyone
mad
yeah
cool,
so
yeah,
so
no
resolution
I
mean
just
you
know.
If
at
any
point,
anybody
you
know
wants
to
take
it
on
awesome
and
we'll
go
from
there.
Oh.
C
I
would
also
just
follow
up
with
that
dumb
I
just
similarly
brought
his
asked
me
to
take
over
as
the
tsc
share.
While
he
retains
the
TFC
director
position,
I
will
be
asking
a
similar
question
tomorrow
at
tomorrow's
tsc
meeting,
just
to
make
sure
that
everyone's
good
with
that
so
just
kind
of
think
about
it
as
well.
B
Something
else
to
add,
I
think
it's
time
to
solicit
questions
from
the
world
and
while
we're
doing
that
read
off
meetings
that
are
coming
up,
I
should
learn
in
Oakland
this
saturday.
If
you
are
interested
in
becoming
a
node.js
contributor
and
you're,
not
this
is
a
great
event
to
do
it
on
Saturday
April
22nd
at
ten
a.m.
local
time
in
Oakland
California.
There
is
a
DSC
meeting
tomorrow
and
I
only
know
this
because
James
just
said
so
and
I
believe
it's
at
twenty-hundred
UTC.
E
B
F
We'll
assume
yes,
the
day
before
on
May
22nd,
there
will
be
a
dinner
/
meet
and
greet
for
the
four-note
jaya
from
the
tc39.
There
will
also
be
an
opportunity
at
jazz
cops
to
potentially
have
some
conversations
that
unrelated,
but
there's
discussion
right
now,
but
trying
to
get
more
tc39
members
to
jazz
coffee.
F
You
and
perhaps
will
be
an
opportunity
there
as
well,
but
at
the
very
least
I
was
talking
about
maybe
doing
a
meet-and-greet
or
a
dinner
between
the
members
of
the
VA
team
and
the
nodejs
CT
CTS
see-
and
you
know
it's
sorted
family
and
friends-
we're
going
to
be
around
during
jazz
club.
So
I'll
follow
up
with
more
details
about
that
later.
Awesome.
B
C
We
get
to
the
questions
I
wanted
to
just
let
folks
know
intel
has
donated
a
server
that
near
forum
will
be
hosting
as
a
dedicated
benchmark
machine
for
running
benchmarks.
We're
gonna
have
the
details
on
on
getting
that
setup
and
we're
looking
with
the
built-in
on
and
getting
ethic
up
to
the
environment.
But
it's
dedicated
hardware
just
for
running
benchmarks,
so
very
happy
that
until
donated
that
I'll
have
more
messaging
on
it
later
but
fun
where
everybody
now.