►
Description
A
B
C
B
D
A
E
F
F
F
Next,
we
have
the
Board
of
Directors
guide
that
was
approved
via
email
vote,
but
no
one
had
ever
socialized
that
to
the
public
side
of
the
house,
so
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
was
announced.
So
that
is
it's
a
bit
C
in
our
pack.
I
does
not
need
a
resolution.
According
to
Andy,
it's
just
a
FYI
to
make
sure
that
that
is
available.
F
F
G
E
B
F
H
B
J
D
K
F
J
F
C
C
F
B
A
L
L
F
F
F
C
M
A
C
A
A
So
it's
an
honor
system
where
they
say
yes,
I
am
an
individual
member
and
then
it's
up
to
myself
and
namhae
to
actually
check
on
that
with
the
individual
membership
list
that
I
have
access
to
internally
to
make
sure
that
that's
the
case
and
if
they
were
not
members
and
they
requested
and
approved,
you
are
agreed
to
receive
those
funds.
They
will
not
be
reimbursed.
F
C
F
We
wanted
clarification,
which
was
Exhibit
D
and
the
board
package,
and
we
wanted
the
ATSC
in
the
compound
to
be
on
the
same
page.
There's
may
be
making
separate
requests
so
now,
as
you
know,
yeah
it's
a
whole
month
ago,
so
we
have
a
request
from
the
table
for
the
additional
67,000
and
we
have
the
the
breakdown.
What
that
means
in
Exhibit
D,
so
I
don't
know
if
everybody
I
can
go
into
the
exhibit,
but
it
comes
down
to
do
we
want
to
do
this.
C
The
allocations
that
were
there
were
prioritizing
right
now
or
getting
collaborators
to
interactive
and
specifically
the
collaborators
some
attending
mentors
to
the
coding
learning
events.
Okay,
so
we
have
one
coming
up:
no
coffee,
for
instance,
and
Ireland.
You
want
to
send
a
couple
of
minutes
words
there
in
particular
Ana
and
enriched
frog,
they're.
C
A
C
C
N
C
A
They're
asked
to
request
it
from
their
employer
first,
especially
if
they
are
a
member.
It's
not
a
requirement,
but
they're
asked
to
do
so
as
part
of
the
guidelines
for
applying,
and
the
collaborator
summit,
of
course,
is
an
incredible
value.
You
get
people
new
and
old,
who
are
coming
together
talking
about
some
really
important
decisions
that
need
to
be
made
in
the
project.
H
F
O
P
F
We
need
to
transfer
that
to
the
foundation,
which
is
roughly
ninety
five
dollars
a
month,
but
if
we
take
those
change
it
variances
in
the
budget
into
account,
we
are
looking
at
and
I'm
going
from
memory,
roughly
$13,000
in
the
black.
Without
my
salary
for
the
earth
which
isn't
costing
us
anything
and
I
first
see
wouldn't
be
a
problem.
Kids
were
raising
money,
but
that's
where
that's
how
it
would
affect
the
budget
is.
We
would
be
very
close
to
running
it
to
the
budget
by
allocating
the
sixty
seven
thousand
dollars.
Q
F
F
If,
depending
on
the
candidate,
that
would
would
take
it,
who
would
probably
not,
we
could
do
less
with
contracting
and
a
full-time
position
making
the
assumption-
and
this
is
the
assumption-
is
that
under
what
you've
asked
me
to
do,
is
run
the
foundation
of
how
I
allocate
contractors
versus
employees
and
such
that
you're
following
there.
But
getting
the
work
done,
I
mean
the
big
thing
is.
R
F
You
look
at
what
Michael
was
doing.
He
was
doing
a
lot
of
the
executive
director
job
and
so
the
community
manager
job,
and
so
it's
not
an
apples
to
apples
head
comparison,
so
so
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
if
we
can
reallocate
the
way
we
spend
our
resources
to
solve
the
same
problem
and
do
it
more
effectively.
Kids.
F
A
We
said
all
of
that,
but
at
the
beginning
of
the
year
the
only
one
that
I
would
foresee
would
be
our
internship
program
and
that,
if
that
were
to
operate
similar
to
last
year,
but
us
doing
it
ourselves
that
tends
that
doesn't
end
up
being
money
out
of
the
node
foundation
in
particular,
because
we
end
up
doing
a
separate
fundraise
for
sponsorships.
For
that.
A
F
F
H
L
C
C
A
N
A
C
F
F
F
L
One
thing
wanted
to
do
in
terms
of
just
growing
growing
our
medium
gauge,
but
we
also
wanted
to
grow
our
views,
of
course,
and
also
our
so
essentially
need
someone
looked
at
it.
Maybe
kind
of
read
it
a
little
bit,
but
just
do
the
full
read
of
it
so
medium
and
using
calculates
it
will
take
six
minutes.
Five
minutes,
three
minutes
for
different
content.
L
You
read
those
and
people
linger
on
the
page
for
lengthy
five
minutes
to
make
say
that
the
read,
if
it's
less
than
that
bet
with
you
so
just
in
terms
of
looking
at
kind
of
how
we
fared
since
launching
it
in
a
huge
increase,
both
views
and
reefs.
We
have
it
so
we're
kind
of
averaging
five
percent
growth
per
month,
that's
again
based
on
followers
as
well
as
used
and
reads,
and
also-
and
you
want
to
turn
to
the
next
one
mark-
we're
really
trying
to
kind
of
our
medium
post.
L
So
a
lot
of
our
medium
comes
from
the
foundation
itself,
but
we
also
have
the
medium
post
for
those
that
want
to
contribute
it.
You
know
jazz
collection,
but
don't
have
their
own
medium
page.
That
can
go
through
the
no
gifts
foundation,
so
we
try
to
get
more
posts
per
month
coming
from
us,
as
well
as
people
outside
of
the
nucleus
foundation.
On
my
site.
L
Again,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
page
kind
of
you
know
has
different
viewpoints
has
different
educational
stories,
because
it's
helped
us
with
our
views
and
our
growth
in
reach,
so
we're
trying
to
average
about
three
posts
per
month.
We've
hit
the
mark
on
some
marks.
We
were
a
little
low
in
June
and
mainly
from
the
June
perspective.
We
spent
a
lot
of
time
in
June
kind
of
reconfiguring
our
editorial
review
process
for
no
gift
collection.
L
We
had
previously
had
the
evangelism
working
groups
review
it,
but
we
weren't
getting
as
many
technical
reviewers
on
different
posts
that
we're
going
through
that
channel.
So
we
decided,
with
these
mark,
to
have
one
to
two
technical
reviewers
review
everything
that
focus
when
a
post
honor,
no
gift
collection.
We
were
quick
to
comment
comms
group
to
come
up
with
something
my
manifest
sense
has
agreed
to
be
a
technical
editor.
There.
It's
been
going
really
really
well.
H
Have
you
looked
at
how
does
its
reviewing
just
out
of
curiosity
open
source
calm,
how
they,
how
they
get
their
reviewers,
because
they've
turned
it
into
now?
They've
turned
it
into
a
thing
that
got
a
lot
of
reviewers
I
mean
you
know,
certainly
more
than
any
other
single
open
source
venue
and
I.
Think
it's
worth
since
you're
trying
to
do
the
same
kind
of
thing.
Look
at
the
incentives
that
they
put
in
place
for
people
that
review
and
it
seems
to
be
working
pretty
well.
L
L
L
A
The
feedback
will
help
too,
because
one
thing
that
zippy
and
I
have
kind
of
been
beating
our
heads
with
is
whether
whether
it's
not
the
amount
of
time
involved
with
the
actual
reviewing,
but
that
the
workflow
might
not
be
something
that
our
technical
reviewers
are
very
comfortable
with
like
they.
It's
not
doesn't
happen
in
github,
and
the
notification
system
for
medium
can
be
very
different,
and
you
know
we're
used
to
filtering
for
github
notifications,
but
not
for
medium
notifications,
and
the
edit
system
is
not
like
something
like
Google
Docs
that
you
would
see.
F
A
A
C
C
They
can
be,
but
it
depends
like
my
process
for
writing.
An
article
and
I
will
write
it
on
medium
and
then
submitted
to
to
the
collection
and
vendors
get
it
need
to
be
made,
but
I
can
I
can
make
that
medium,
I'm,
comfortable
and
I'm
doing
that
more
familiar
with
the
process.
If
we
are
going
on
actively
acquiring
new
content,
you
asked
me
to
write,
then
you
know
encouraging
them
to
do
it
on
it.
First
would
probably
eat
the
better.
F
C
P
C
C
F
Almost
cold
a
zippe
yeah
yeah,
it's
very
well
curated,
so
and
I
actually
think
that
more
James
smells
out
there
saying
that
that
we
retweet
has
broader
reach,
reaches,
reaches
sort
of
one
of
those
metrics
that
I
sort
of
hate,
because
it's
absolutely
it
stinks.
But
relatively
it's
good
I
think
we
have
exceptional
reach
with
our
tweet.
A
A
F
C
F
L
F
A
A
P
F
I
think
someone
has
brought
up
last
meeting
about
whether
or
not
how
we
ranked
versus
other
languages.
I
tried
to
take
a
cross-section
of
just
followers
just
to
give
us
a
sort
of
measuring
stick
on
how
we
compare
so
java.net
Russ,
rails,
etc
as
a
comparison
to
the
OJS
followers
and
then
through
in
the
ASF,
the
Linux
Foundation,
yes,
Twitter's.
F
H
R
A
So
currently-
and
this
week
we
are
meeting
with
the
proctoring
group
to
integrate
to
see
the
demo
for
the
integration.
So
we've
got
the
registration
system
integrated
with
hacker
rank,
to
be
able
to
actually
see
the
demo
for
what
the
exam
looks
like
and
now
is
the
integration
fixes
with
the
proctoring
layer,
because
there
was
a
lot
of
conversation
and
planning
around
that,
but
without
having
the
hacker
rank
and
LFT
systems
integrated,
we
sort
of
nothing
we
could
do
with
the
proctoring
team.
So
that's
happening
this
week.
A
Alpha
testing
begins
right
after
that,
and
we're
gonna
have
multiple
phases
of
the
alpha
testing
and
that's
because
we
want
to
be
able
to
test
for
the
user
experience
with
the
exam
itself,
but
then
also
with
the
questions
and
how
they're
coded
and
we'll
move
on
to
the
beta
testing
so
yeah
and
we're
still
looking
for
beta
testers
so
feel
free
to
email
me
or
open
an
issue.
We've
got
issues
open
on
the
public
repo
for
the
certification
and
you
can
find
links
to
that
with
the
Education
repo
as
well.
N
A
So
the
alpha
testing
is
too
small,
so
we
don't
really
is
it's
not
too
small?
It
is
small.
We
don't
need
anyone
else
else,
volunteering
for
that,
but
we
are
looking
for
beta
testers
and
if
you
sign
up
for
the
beta
testing
phase
as
candidate
there
is
the
possibility,
if
you
participate
in
the
beta,
you
can
certify
from
that.
So
you
do
have
the
possibility
of
certifying
you're
not
just.
A
What
we
were
looking
for,
there's
a
screening
process
involved
in
terms
of
we
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
different
types
of
people
who
are
signing
up
for
it
so
I
need
to
have
more
background
information.
So
there's
going
to
be
a
form
so
that
I
can
gather
that
data
my
initially
and
what
I
had
been
gathering.
Thus
far,
people
were
giving
me
that
information
via
email,
so
I
have
a
list
of
beta
candidates,
but
we'll
need
more,
probably
another
20
yeah.
C
A
I
also
wanted
to
mention
sorry
just
regarding
education
code
and
learn.
Jay's
comp,
China,
we're
gonna,
have
a
report
back
on
that
next
month,
so
it
was
really
fresh
and
they
had
just
returned
and
we're
trying
to
get
a
little
more
information
from
the
organizers
as
well.
So
we
would
have
data
around
that
set.