►
Description
A
B
E
H
J
A
small
enhancement
to
allow
us
to
run
tests
multiple
times
for
stress
testing,
funny
image
issues,
miss
reviews,
comments
and
lands,
help
identify
an
issue
with
tests.
Mpm
install
did
a
sniff
test
at
the
DPC
wineries
that
are
building
being
built
as
part
of
the
releases
and
working
with
you
know,
IBM
team
members
on
post
more
to
meet
you
and
note
as
a
shared
library
work
that
is
ongoing.
A
L
L
We
also
bless
the
visual
c++,
build
tools
for
lady
module
development,
also
been
working
with
my
team
to
port
benchmarks,
a
few
benchmarks
that
are
not
working
cross
back
over
40
nose
and
then
I
didn't
view
the
fuel
issues
and
put
a
quest.
That's
all
for
me.
Next
is
burnt,
but
not
yeah.
Okay,
so
next
is
rod,
but
we
cannot
hear
rod
set
down
son.
M
So
I
updated
the
data
behind.
I
think
I
think
I've
been
on
glass
said
update,
but
anyway,
I've
said
the
data
behind
the
foal
ICMP
in
module,
because
people
are
picking
up,
node,
6
20,
so
I
didn't
have
I,
see
57
data
posted
about
snow,
fixed
and
also
there's
a
restart
meeting
of
the
int'l
working
group.
After
a
couple
months,
heads
up
is
Trevor.
N
A
Hi,
I
think
someone
muted
me
or
something
maybe
I
mean
it
myself,
hi
so
right,
Oh
addressing
flaky
tests
taking
some
non
CI
tests
because
they
do
things
like
go
out
to
the
internet
and
trying
to
modify
them
to
make
them,
so
they
can
run
in
CI
with
varying
degrees
of
success.
What
if
you
test
for
API
calls
that
aren't
currently
covered
in
CI
anywhere
and
I've
been
pondering
a
way
to
check
new
test
for
flakiness
before
landing?
A
This
was
brought
about
by
a
couple
of
relatively
new
tests
being
a
source
of
some
painful.
More
than
merely
intermittent
failures
on
CI
and
I've,
been
when
I
need
some
mindless
drudgery
and
and
and
get
spelunking
I've
been
adding
some
enamel
data,
API
dot,
that's
about
when
very
safe
guys
were
introduced
and
I
recommend
anybody
was
bored
do
that
she
yechi
showed
up
while
the
stand
up
was
happening.
So
maybe
he
wants
to
tell
us
what
he's
been
up
to
I'm,
not
sure
I'm.
A
G
A
A
H
A
H
B
So
all
right,
so
we
talked
about
reverting
59-58.
It
was
a
PR
6537
based
on
another
discussion
last
week
that
was
revised
to
put
to
the
new
behavior.
This
is
the
sim
linked
peer
dependency
change,
I,
put
the
new
behavior
behind
a
flag.
Did
that
got
that
landed
and
now
in
6.2
the
preserving
symlinks
behavior
is
now
behind
a
command-line
plugin
and
we're
using
the
old
behavior
by
people.
B
B
R
R
P
I've
heard
of
it
got
ahold
of
engine
implementers
and
I'm,
currently
talking
with
young
cue
from
chakra
and
Adam
climb
from
v8,
because
they're
going
to
have
to
make
a
slightly
unpleasant
change
for
them
to
support
up
importing
values
like
because
they
were
expecting
only
to
ever
hook
up
source
code
directly
to
source
code,
so
I'm
kind
of
working
that,
through
with
them
and
approaches
they
can
take.
Oh
well,
they
don't
like
it
but
doable
so
I,
don't
think
we're
blocked
there.
P
See
what
else
I
think
those
are
the
big
there's,
a
agreement
that
we
should
add
path
searching
back
to
the
proposal,
so
the
browser
path,
resolution
algorithm
and
the
HTML
spec
doesn't
do
things
like
search
for
index
J
s
and
it
doesn't
look
at
package.json
files
in
directories
tc39
what
WG
agreed
it
would
be.
Okay
if
we
added
that
back
to
the
spec,
so
that
would
make
it
match
require,
which
is
much
nicer
on
our
engine.
P
R
P
R
R
We
appreciate
that.
We
appreciate
the
effort
that
you're
putting
in
both,
particularly
you
rightly
so,
thanks
for
staying
connected
and
then
pushing
for
our
interests,
but
yeah.
Just
please
let
us
know
if
we
need
to
be
more
in
sync
with
discussions
if
we
need
more
present
there.
This
is
a
hard
topic
that
a
lot
of
us,
probably
not
that
inclined
to
you,
know,
want
to
have
to
engage
in
because
we're
so
busy,
but
there's
obviously
point
at
which
it
would
be
much
more
preferable
to
have
more
of
us
fully
engaged.
R
P
R
P
R
As
soon
as
soon
as
one
engine
goes
ahead
and
implements,
then
it's
like
that
spec
is,
is
fixed
in
stone.
Let
me
just
come
have
to
put
up
with
it,
though.
Okay,
let's
move
on
standard
I/o
woes,
it's
listed
as
so.
We've
got
two
two
issues
listed
here
at
73,
sorry,
677,
3,
&,
6,
8,
16
and
I.
Think
there's
a
few
more,
but
this
is
an
ongoing
drama
and
I
would
like
both
James
and
Jeremiah.
To
talk
to
this
and
and
others
whooping
involves
James.
Can
you
go
first.
B
Yeah,
so
we
would
have
this
just
as
some
background.
I
got
this
long
long,
standing
issue
of
nami
of
Io
on
standard
out
that
they're
either
being
blocking
her
non-blocking,
apparently
depending
on
which
one
you're
running
on
a
recent
update
to
live.
Uv
didn't
cause
the
problem,
but
it
made
them
more
apparent,
particularly
on
OS
X,
and
you
know,
Jeremiah
boys
are
coated
with
specific
details
as
to
why
I'm
better
than
I
could,
but
it
would
ended
up
happening.
B
C
B
G
But
recently
we
started
reopening
in
TTYL
name
instead
of
/
dev,
/
TTYL
and
apparently
that
works
with
KQ
on
windows.
So
now
all
of
a
sudden
it's
non
blocking
when
we
didn't
expect
it
to
be,
even
though
we
previously
had
sort
of
expected
it
to
be,
but
the
effects
of
that
were
never
a
parent.
Now
that
gains
apparent
effects
mostly
on
Mac,
because
the
OS
level
buffer,
which
is
hard-coded,
is
hard-coded
to
be
one
kilobyte
in
size.
G
If
you're
using
any
NZ
escape
codes
to
control
what
the
output
should
look
like,
because
then
you
get
output
that
just
looks
completely
messed
up,
and
this
is
then
also
a
problem
with
the
longer
standing
issue
that
we've
already
known
about
with
pipes.
We're
piping
would
truncate
input.
If
you
closed
it,
however,
that
used
to
only
occur
in
situations
where
it
was
a
lot
larger
of
a
size
as
far
as
I
can
tell,
and
so
now
it
seems
to
that.
C
G
L
L
H
H
Reasonable
but
I
will
probably
need
to
consider
threads
because
they
will
continue
running
notice
and
also
about
the
kid
that
neither
has
asked
about
I.
Think
I.
Roars
are
currently
printed
with
F
print
from
the
c++,
so
you
first
and
on
she
has
process
crashers
there
or
should
be
flashed
to
this,
has
to
be
here
or
I.
H
R
H
We
are
not
printing
I'm,
just
just
renting
critically,
just
rent
and
yeah,
just
it
is
like
a
behavior
change.
You
know
so
right
now,
when
the
process,
crashes
or
exits,
everything
gets
cables,
but
it
will
flash
and
I
don't
know
if
it'll
block
the
stretch
open
to
your
end,
so
it
may
be
different,
but
maybe
not
right.
G
G
I
did
open
a
PR
with
the
example
code.
I
should
make
one
other
note.
If
you
actually
look
at
the
man
docks
for
exit
3,
you
will
note
that
at
least
on
my
platform,
which
is
OS
X
but
I,
suspect
most
others.
It
actually
will
attempt
to
flush
standard
I/o,
but
we
I
as
far
as
I
understand,
are
dealing
with
it
in
a
different
way,
so
that
doesn't
actually
work
but
normally
running.
Exit
from
C++
would
actually
do
this.
To
begin
with,.
G
G
R
G
For
one
of
the
issues,
the
other
one,
so
the
the
fix
that's
going
to
fix
most
of
the
apparent
problems
is
to
make
TTYL
is
blocking.
There's
some
disagreement.
If
we
should
be
doing
not
I
can't
I
haven't
been
brought
any
cases
where
that
would
actually
break
something
or
actually
affect.
Any
application.
Also
note
that
if
you're
making
applications
on
a
cross-platform
you're
going
to
have
to
deal
with
this
on
Windows
anyways,
so
yeah.
B
And
you're
right,
you
raise
a
question
to
me:
I
guess
I'm,
one
of
the
threads
and
you
know
and
I
didn't
answer
it
directly.
You
know
because
I
did
want
to
just
stop
and
take
some
time
to
think
about
it
and
off
the
top
of
my
head.
I
cannot
also
can't
think
of
any
cases
that
should
break
if
we,
if
we
just
make
a
TTYL
walking
by
default.
R
Particularly
when
we
are,
if
we
are
shipping
a
platform
that
does
one
thing
and
then
we
want
to
change
it,
and
even
if
we
can't
think
of
how
people
might
be
using,
you
know
in
taking
advantage
of
the
way
it
works.
Now.
The
fact
that
we
are
shipping,
it
means
that
it
could
be
used
out
there
in
some
weird
way
and
as
soon
as
we
break
it,
it's
broken
for
them
and
we
may
not
even
hear
about
that.
But
the
pain
could
be
real.
G
So
there's
a
couple
things
there,
so
it
was
it's
always
blocking
on
windows
to
begin
with,
it's
always
so
far
been
blocking
on
Mac,
even
though
we
haven't
intended
that
the
only
platform
that
would
actually
change
in,
like
the
long
term
then,
would
be
TD
wise
on
Linux,
which
is
the
most
common
to
put
a
bit
playful
rate
right.
But
it's
not
what
most
people
run
CLI
ops
on
as
far
as
I
can
tell
that
might
not
be
true
I
input,
but
you.
G
Certainty
with
the
issue
right,
the
other
thing
is
that
you
can
actually
change
the
behavior
on.
You
need
to
ask
the
handle
to
do
it,
but
not
API
is
already
being
used
and
we
can't
just
get
rid
of
it
anyways.
So
if
people
actually
end
up
needing
to
use
that
we
could
do
something
about
it,
I'm
not
I'm
not
against
adding
a
flag
door.
If
that's
what
everyone
would
prefer.
L
R
G
G
L
B
B
So
I,
like
I
said,
I
agree
with
you
to
remind
that.
There's
there's
probably
no
use
case
that
we
could
that
we
could
reasonably
come
up
with,
or
you
know
we're
switching
to
to
blocking
by
default
would
would
break
and
you're
right
that
we
have.
You
know
the
ability
to
you
know
somebody
could
just
do
underscore.
Handle
said
blocking
false
if
they
really
need
it,
but
we've
been
telling
people
consistently
and
we've
been
trying
to
get
people
to
not
use
those
underscored
properties
priming
and
to
turn
around,
and
just
you
know,
keep
saying:
okay!
B
Well,
don't
use
it
in
this
case.
Use
it
in
this
case
is
just
adds
confusion.
So
it's
if
we're.
If
we're
going
to
say
to
anyone,
if
you
really
need
it,
here's
a
way
of
doing
it.
We
should
at
least
provide
an
API,
a
public
supported
API.
That
does
it
even
if
we
turn
around
and
say,
but
you
really
shouldn't
yeah.
R
B
R
C
J
B
H
Sink
that
could
be
one
slight
problem
with
looking
right.
If
I
remember
correctly,
it
was
right
long
time
ago,
when
we
first
discussed
this,
I
think
the
scrapes
could
be
slower
on
a
common
line
on
OSX
made
my
own
line,
it's
as
well,
so,
basically,
when,
whenever
a
script
will
print
stuff,
it
will
be
slowed
down
by
the
console
but
walk
I.
Think
well,
this
a
room
or
something
similar
to
this
I'm,
not
sure
how
much
does
a
problem
right
now
or
if
it's
the
problem
at
all,
just
yeah
in.
J
Theory,
if
you
in
at
some
point,
if
there's
there's
something
that
slows
that
the
consuming
of
the
TTYL
data
it
would
back
up
into
the
year
right,
which
is
I,
think
what
you're
saying
just
as
convene
on
the
non
terminal
case,
but
just
the
regular
case.
It
takes
some
time
to
get
the
characters
out
right.
G
So
keep
in
mind
that
yeah,
like
we
could
add,
saying
for
maybe
like
Linux
for
the
for
that
to
work
that
doesn't
really
work
on
mac,
though,
because
the
buffer
size
is
hard-coded
and
it's
tiny
and
you're
like
a
hundred
times
more
likely
to
run
into
the
issue
where
your
standard
I/o
just
get
some
lunch
together.
And
you
can't
tell
what's
actually
going
on
in
your
TTYL,
then.
J
G
Okay,
I'll
look
at
adding
an
environment
variable,
for
that
is
anyone
like
amy.
I
mean
if
I
added
option
to
2.
Similarly
for
flushing
on
exit.
Does
anyone
object
to
us
actually
closing
all
the
other
handles
and
keeping
the
event
loop
open
for
it
to
flush
itself,
rather
than
trying
to
get
a
fast
shut
down
into
the
DV
isolated
wooden,
peg
I.
H
G
J
H
G
B
R
Just
on
the
question
of
urgency
here,
I
know
Indian
particularly
we're
making
a
big
fuss
about
this,
but
are
we?
Are
we
getting
a
sense
of
urgency
from
them
and
others
on
this,
and
are
we
concerned
about
that
at
all
or
do?
Are
we
more
confident
that
we
have
to
I'm
not
suggesting
that
we
speed
things
up
I'm,
just
wondering
what
what
the
community
agencies
that
we're
picking
up
here
has
npm
picked
up
on
the
difficulty
the
nuances
of
this
and
are
they
to
Jeremiah
I?
R
G
Someone
else
from
a
different
package,
David
I
think
is
the
package
name
came
and
originally
reported
the
issue
to
us
anything
that
uses
why
args
for
argument's
management
kind
of
has
issues.
I
can
definitely
foresee
issues
and
tools
that
I've
written
in
the
last
yeah
generally,
not
great.
If
you're
ranked
see
like
tools
on
Mac
and
it
may
or
may
it
may
produce,
stand
out
and
stand
out
at
the
same
time,
you'll
have
problems.
F
F
G
R
R
B
One
should
be
super
simple:
it
we
have
this
sink
right
stream
that
you
know
I
actually
noticed
it.
Looking
into
the
CIO
issues,
it's
sitting
there
in
the
fs
module
right
now
was,
but
a
big
note
thing
don't
use
this.
It's
only
here
to
the
quarter.
Sdio
uses
one
look
like
out
bingo
file,
but
it's
missing
on
the
fs
module
with
very
little
reason
to
actually
be
there.
B
J
R
R
B
So
when
we
landed
that
hack
two
months
ago,
it
was
under
the
understanding
that
after
60
went
out,
we'd
reverted,
so
after
six
I
went
out,
I
went
ahead
and
open
the
pr
to
say
you
know:
when
are
we
ready
to
go
ahead
and
revert
this?
The
challenge
with
it
is
that
this
you
know
yeah
being
able
to
revert.
B
This
is
actually
blocking
other
changes
like
the
sink
right
right
stream
change,
because
if
we
want
to
end
pull
that
unfold,
that
deprecation
out
pulled
our
code
out,
it
could
actually
break
things
when
people
reevaluate
at
that
ingrateful
test
or
whatever
it
so
the
we
would
need
to
get
this
revert
landed
before
we
could
revert
the
previous
issue
and
before
we
can
make
other
similar
kinds
of
changes
in
the
fs
module.
So
at
this
point,
there's
a
class
of
changes.
We're
not
able
to
make
in
FS
did
we
need
to?
Because
of
this.
G
V-Mail,
what
are
the
changes
that
we
actually
need
to
make?
Because
so
the
thing
is
I
think
it
may
be
better
if
we
wait
until
v8
and
land
it
in
v8,
so
waiting
it
or
just
wait
even
longer
into
the
v7
cycle.
Let
a
couple
more
people
get
off
of
it
and
make
sure
we're
doing
them
because-
and
the
thing
is
like
right
now-
there's
nothing
super
urgent
that
we
need
to
internalize
for
up.
Well,
so
I'm
not
seeing
the
reason
to
do
it
immediately.
G
B
B
G
B
R
Actually,
I
I
object
as
well
like
just,
but
it's
a
soft
objection.
It's
like
you
know
whoa.
This
is
if
we
did
have
a
lot
of
breakage
when
we
did
first
did
this.
So
let's
take
it
slowly
kind
of
thing,
but
but
I
am
actually
happy
to
go
with
the
crowd
of
this
one.
If
others
feels
you
know
that
it's
just
not
a
big
deal,
I.
D
G
B
R
B
R
P
So
I
actually
have
questions
/
comment
about
the
symlink
behavior
that
we
saw
a
couple
weeks
ago.
I
really
don't
think
we
should
use
canonical
paths
to
refer
to
real
files,
so
I
can
kind
of
wax
poetically
about
this
and
maybe
offline.
So
I'm
wondering
what
the
exact
use
case
in
why
we
started
doing.
That
is.
B
Everything
said
all
in
agreeance
great,
so
you
know
when
I'd
make
the
change
and
then
everything
broke
in
62
last
week
we
I
landed
a
change
that
puts
the
new
behavior
behind
a
flag
and
restored
the
old
behavior,
so
from
62
onward
we're
using
the
pre
v6
behavior
by
default,
and
someone
would
have
to
explicitly
pass
in.
You
know
dash
dash,
preserve
symlinks
man
line
flag
in
order
to
to
use
the
new
behavior.
The
people
that
would
primarily
be
would
be
doing.
That
would
be
the
people
who
actually
care
about
the
assembling
care
dependency
issue.