►
From YouTube: Diagnostics WG meeting 22-07-2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
C
A
D
A
Which
specifically
talks
about
the
diagnostic
feedback
diagnostic
in
skates,
away,
Peter
and
I
devised
this
set
of
questions?
The
questions
itself
is
quite
exhaustive,
but
it's
basically
covering
a
lot
of
aspects
about
Diagnostics.
So
whoever
is
serious
about
Diagnostics
would
find
it
useful.
Would
you
would
really
be
interested
to
fill
this
questionnaire
and
give
us
Boykin
feedback.
A
I
am
not
sure
whether
we
actually
instituted
or
published
this
survey
I
think
I
need
to
check
with
either
Michael
Dawson
or
Peter
to
see
what
is
the
state
of
this
if
it
is
not
published.
Probably
we
could
have
a
review
on
this
as
a
team
in
one
of
the
upcoming
meetings
and
then
take
it
forward.
So
I'm
pasting,
this
link
of
the
Google
of
the
Google
Doc,
which
contains
the
user
survey
for
Diagnostics
working
group.
Specifically,
please
have
a
look
and
mention
your
record,
your
comments.
If
any.
A
D
A
B
A
A
But
we
agree
that
this
item
should
be
there
early
agenda
right,
I'm,
just
asking,
because
this
has
been
there
for
quite
some
time
and
we
had
multiple
rounds
of
discussion
about
what
should
be
the
next
actions
or
what
should
be
the
items
that
we
need
to
identify
for
this
one,
both
in
core
and
the
diagnostic
working
group.
If
I
understand
correctly.
B
B
Storage
now,
which
I
think
has
somewhat
more
of
an
actual
path
to
stability,
it
doesn't
really
expose
any
internals
or
anything,
so
I
think
we
can
make
more
of
a
promise
that
that
could
reduce
table
at
some
point.
So
I'm,
not
too
sure
about
the
continued
existence
of
this
issue,
like
suggestions
to
the
eighths
and
cooks,
would
be
stable
at
some
point.
But
more
just
think
there
should
be
a
general
check-in
of
that
category
of
stuff,
I
guess
to
figure
out
like.
B
A
B
D
A
A
We
PR
able
to
wind
up
again
with
this
agenda,
but
just
one
last
point
here
is:
we
have
a
new
joinee
cutoff
fail.
So
I
was
looking
at
the
PR,
which
is
PR
number
4
for
1/3
self-nomination
to
the
diagnostic
team,
I'm
I'm,
not
able
to
recollect
the
procedure
for
on
the
entry
to
the
working
group.
Do
you
recollect
my
kids
I?
Don't.