►
From YouTube: 2021-02-11-Next 10 years of Node.js
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Okay,
so
welcome
to
the
node.js
next
10
team
meeting
for
february
11th
2021
first
time
at
our
new
time.
So
maybe
a
few
people
will
take
a
little
while
to
get
you
to
get
to
be
aware
that,
but
let's
look
at
the
issues
that
were
the
things
that
were
tagged
in
the
agenda.
So
let
me
find.
A
A
Okay
right,
so
the
next
thing,
then,
is
it
before
we
get
started.
If
there's
anybody,
anybody
has
the
announcements
that
they'd
like
to
share.
A
A
In
that
case,
we
drove
a
fun
retro
board.
I
think
mary
was
kind
of
driving
that
discussion,
so
maybe
we
should
defer
that
one
until
a
meeting
where
she
could
make
it
before
we
sort
of
go
over
the
next
steps.
So
we
could
go
to
our
other
agenda
item,
which
was
the
brainstorming
on
the
key
technical
areas.
A
C
Yeah,
I
think
I
showed
it
in
a
slack
group,
but
I
don't
know
if
actually
posted
it
back
to
the
issue
itself,
I'm
not
sure
if
that
same
one,
I
can
just
double
check.
If
those
are
this.
A
C
Yeah,
so
I
found
it,
I
pasted
it
into
chat
if
you
want
to
add
those
thoughts
and
I'll
just
add
it
to
the
issue
itself
and
if
I
thought
we
were
maybe
gonna
get
try
to
disseminate
it
through
marketing.
Somehow.
B
C
Yep,
but
it's
anybody
should
be
able
to
add
to
it
right.
A
E
The
the
promote
didn't
seem
to
work
just
as.
C
E
C
So
we
can
turn
on
showing
card
authors,
okay,
but
and
since,
like
that,
won't
I
don't
believe
that
go
is
retroactively
applied.
Oh
it's
only
for
me
and
a
couple
other
folks,
so
yeah
I
would.
I
don't
know.
If
maybe
we
can
just
take
a
note
of
the
current
status
and
sure.
A
A
A
I
guess
that's
part
of
the
discussion
here
too,
is
like
how
how
broad
the
group
do
we
want
to
go
to
to
start
with.
Do
we
want
to
put
it
out
to
everybody,
the
node
collaborators
or.
E
I
mean
if
we're
putting
it
out
on
the
twitter
account
it's
going
to
be:
that's
that's
as
wide
a
net
as
possible,
yep
so
and
there's
nothing.
C
E
For
sure
on
this
one
it'd
be
nice.
If
we
could
just
compose
like
a
little
bit
of
copy
it
like,
I
can
do
it
one-on-one
with
someone,
but
just
like
making
sure
we're
saying
what
we
want
people
to
do
in
a
concise
way.
Can
people
add
to
this
darcy
like?
Can
we
just
enable
voting
without
adding
or
do
we
want
to?
Let
people
add.
E
A
C
It's
definitely
a
like
mob
management
or
mob,
like
like
similar,
like
mod
programming,
like
people,
can
just
add
to
the
columns.
I
do
not
believe
everybody
is
able
to
like
create
new
columns
or
like
modify
those
specifically,
but
in
terms
of
context,
yeah
toony.
We
can
add
like
a
description
at
the
top
for
sure
or
like
some
more
context
like
a
little
blurb
about
what
this
is
about.
That
might
more
more
than
just
the
title
that's
outlined.
E
A
E
That's
a
yeah
like
creating
a
discussion
doing
one
there
and
then
going
doing
another
clone
of
it.
I
don't
know
how
much
work
a
clone
is
stars,
but
you
know
doing
a
different
clone
for
one
for
the
collaborators
discussion,
one
for
public.
A
Because
the
other,
the
other
approach,
could
be
more
of
a
survey
kind
of
thing
for
the
broader,
like
you
know,
we've
we
kind
of
brainstormed
the
constituencies
we
put
something
together.
That
was
in
a
in
a
reasonable
shape
and
then
we're
going
out
with
a
survey
that
says
hey.
Can
you
give
us
some
feedback
on
this?
I
wonder
if,
for
the
broader
you
know
the
broader
community,
you
know
once
we've
gone
through
that
cycle
with
hopefully
more
collaborators.
A
Maybe
we
put
something
together
and
then
ask
for
like
hey,
which
one
of
these
do,
you
think
is
important
and
and
more
of
a
just
and
here's
an
open
like
a
free
form
for
things
that
you
think,
we've
missed,
because
that
would
kind
of
address
the
issue
around,
like
moderation
and
a
freeform
board.
E
I
mean,
I
think,
the
the
one
thing
that's
nice
about
the
freeform
thing
is
like
it'd
be
nice
if
we
can
just
get
voting
on
what
the
collaborators
have
put
together
rather
than
and
like
have
like
these
are
the
things
we're
going
for.
Please
like
give
your
input
on
those,
rather
than
like,
allowing
extension
of
that.
If
that
makes
sense,
but
I
don't
know,
if
that's
possible,
I
don't
know
if
that's
a
feature
of
this
site
or
not.
C
I
I
don't
quite
know
if
it's
it's
got
that
scoping
ability
where
it's
like.
It's
got
some
features,
but
I
don't
know
if
it
has
the
capability
of
like
yeah.
C
I
don't
see
anything
right
now,
even
in
sort
of
the
advanced
section
for
you
to
not
move
like
even
other
people's
cards,
so
you
like,
I
know
that
michael's
being
able
to
before,
like
obviously
collapse
and
and
flex
cards
together
and
and
we've
been
able
to
make
edits,
etc.
It's
it's
very
collaborative
that
way,
but
that's
also,
you
know.
A
Yeah
somebody
could
go
in
and
delete
everything
right,
so
I
guess
the
first
question
is:
like
you
know,
do
we
want
to
do
a
first
pass
with
the
like
as
a
node
discussion
and
then
figure
out
if
we
want
a
broader
like
to
go
even
broader
right.
E
C
No,
no,
no!
Well,
we
already
have
like
two
boards
now
that
are
essentially
the
exact
same
thing,
and
so
like
can
we
just
have
like
one,
that's
private
and
one
that's
or
like
once
that's
like
the
inner
circle,
one!
That's
like
the
community.
A
C
A
C
C
Pasted
the
original
one
that
we
worked
on,
that
the
community
one
is
cloned
from,
and
just
I
guess
the
note
there
is
that
I
I
disabled,
the
editing
and
moving
of
cards
right.
E
A
E
I
mean
also
like,
if,
if
we
do
want
to
do
public
voting
like
honestly
having
a
discussion
where
p,
we
just
have
these
items
and
then
put
thumbs
up
like
people
can
thumbs
up
them
or
like
react
to
them
in
certain
different
ways
as
the
thread
items
and
like
requests
that
people
don't
come
requested,
people
don't
comment
on
it
and
stuff
like
that.
C
A
B
A
C
C
Yeah,
there's
almost
nothing.
I
think
the
the
maximum
votes
is
just
what's
changed
and
tunia,
I'm
not
sure
if
you
have
the
ability
to
edit
the
description,
but
if
you
don't
definitely
poke
me,
if
you
have
some
language,
you
think
that
would
be
good
to
put
in
there.
E
D
B
E
I
think
it's,
I
think
it's
fine
to
seed
it
with
some
votes.
Like
that's
a
community
building
thing
is
you
want
to
have
some
kind
of
content
there
to
show
people
a
path?
I
I
think
that's
probably
a
good
idea
and.
A
E
That's
fair,
I
I
think
both
are
probably
true
and
it's
just
we
have
to
choose
which
one
we
want
to
do.
Yeah.
A
E
D
E
Can
we
can
do
that?
We
can
just
have
him
disable
that
I
can
ping
him
on
that.
A
Yeah,
I
think
so
yeah,
let's
let's
okay,
so
yeah!
If
you
can
pick
him
to
just
say
hey,
can
you
turn
that
off
yeah
we'll
post
it
here
and
then,
if
p
few
people
do
it
with
the
votes
showing
whatever
right
so
okay?
So
if
you
see
what
I've
typed
in
there,
do
you
think
that
gives
enough
context
in
terms
of
the
ask.
A
B
A
B
B
A
D
Well,
I
was
just
gonna
ask
since
I've
been
a
little
bit
absent
lately
where
so
we
we,
we
said
we're
going
to
do
the
survey
we
we
obviously
will
need
to
put
together.
Like
the
specific
questions
we
want
on
the
survey
in
the
format.
Do
we
think
that
we,
as
a
small
group,
have
anything
more
to
add
than
what
we
have
in
the
gem
board
until
we
other
than
like
putting
together
those
questions?
Like
I'm
wondering
what
like
just
me
reading
these
I'm
like
yeah,
this
seems
there's
two
two
different
things.
A
A
A
We
were
going
to
basically
go
out
and
say:
okay,
you
know
these
are
the
needs
and
we
actually
written
up
the
the
survey
that
we
were
gonna
do.
So
let
me
find
that
yeah.
D
A
That
and
then
we
where
was
the:
where
did
we
do,
that?
I
think
I
might
have
made
the
mistake.
I
did.
A
B
B
B
B
B
Sorry,
just
taking
some
notes
from
there.
A
D
Yeah,
they
look
really
good.
I
think
the
the
second
one
being
sort
of
the
most
important,
which
is
just
like
yep,
check
all
the
boxes
that
apply,
which
is
great.
A
A
So
yeah,
so
I
think
on
that
front
you
know
we've
got,
we've
got
the
questions.
We've
talked
to
the
foundation
staff
and
you
know
they've
agreed
we'll
launch
that
around
the
first
of
march,
so
I
don't
think
there's
too
much
more
to
to
that.
We
necessarily
need
to
do
on
that
front.
I
think
back
to
your
other
question.
A
You
know
form
that
into
a
list
that
will
prioritize
or
anything
like
that.
Does
that
make
sense
to
people.
D
A
Yeah,
it's
like
that
survey
will
kind
of
will
cover
the
like
the
needs,
and
then
you
know
once
we
get
the
brain
I
was
what
I
was
thinking
is
like.
Maybe
once
we
get
this
this
next
set
of
broader
input,
we
put
something
together,
kind
of
like
we
have
for
that
constituencies
matrix
and
then
have
a
broader
survey
that
says:
hey
you
know,
did
we
miss
anything
effectively
right
versus
a
fun
retro
where
we
could
have
50
000
people,
all
modifying.
E
D
Well,
yeah!
That's!
But
if
we
have
both
the
like
internal
discussion
thing
and
we
do
a
user
survey
for
these,
you
know
needs
and
wants
of
constituencies.
D
I
wonder
how
much
value
there
is
in
doing
another
one
when
maybe
it'd
be
better
to
just
like
post
a
presentation
of
the
current
state
of
the
results
for
like
general
discussion,
because
I
think
you
know
there
there's
a
like
a
diminishing
return.
If
we
just
continue
asking
for
more
feedback
like
people.
B
D
Given
feedback
would
probably
not
participate
in
the
second
round,
because
they've
already
spent
their
time
doing
it
or
if
they
do
it,
it'd
be
sort
of
second,
you
know
the
la
just
less
valuable
and
I
feel
like
a
write-up
where
we
say
like
okay,
we
spent
a
bunch
of
time
doing
this.
You
filled
out
the
survey.
You
know
the
the
contributors
to
the
project
went
and
did
a
round
of
internal
feedback
like
here's
where
we're
at
are.
Are
you
good
with
this
we'll
get
a
lot
more
people
standing
up
and
saying?
Oh,
no,
no!
Wait!
D
You
totally
missed
me
because
they'll
be
like
worried
that
we
we've
reached
the
end
of
the
process
and
if
they
don't
speak,
then
their
voice
won't
be
heard.
That's
the
way
I
feel
about
it
anyway,
like.
A
A
D
It's
because
well,
I
was
just
gonna
say:
maybe
it's
just
because
that
one
will
change
more
in
the
long
run
right
because
as
new
things
right
happen
in
the
ecosystem.
So
because
I
don't
I
mean
reading
it,
I
don't
feel
like
it's
other
than
it
hasn't
been
converted
into
sort
of
the
list.
With
the
you
know,
nice
table
and
all
that
stuff
like.
I
don't
think
it's
drastically
missing
the
point
or
behind
you
know,
on
on
its
maturity.
As
a
as
you
know,
maybe
I'm
missing
the
point
of
what
you're
you're
asking.
A
A
D
Where's
the
title
of
it.
Sorry,
let
me
go
back.
A
Yeah,
okay,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that's
the
one
you
were
talking
about
it
that
yeah
it's
got.
It's
got
a
bunch
of
things
that
you
know,
but
I
think
our
main
concern
on
that
one
is
like
that
was
a
brainstorm
for
four
people
right,
so
it
may
it
may
be
pretty
good,
but
we
want
to
make
sure
we
get
broader
input
that
we're
you
know
reflects
what
people
think.
D
Yeah,
maybe
I
should
take
a
step
back
and
just
say
my
concern
about
just
doing
too
many
surveys
is
that
people
will
be
compromised
like,
like
you
know,
just
for
feedback
here.
The
survey
that
went
out
recently
it
ate
my
answers
and
I
never
filled
it
out
again
like
it's
just.
D
Takes
too
long
right,
like
as
users,
you
know
filling
out
a
survey
yeah,
I
don't
we
do
these
things
at
netflix
and,
like
the
response
rate,
is
super
low,
unless
we
are
like
really
critical
about
why
we're
sending
it
out
and
very
clear
in
our
com.
You
know
the
description
and
I
don't
know
that
if
we
do
more
than
one
here,
we're
gonna
land
them
well
with
like
a
broad
twitter
audience,
that's.
A
Right
yeah,
I
know
so
far
fair
enough,
fair
enough
and
and
the
feedback
from
you
know,
some
of
the
staff
was
don't.
Don't
do
too
many
surveys
too
right,
because
people
get
fatigued,
but
it's
okay.
So
I
I
think
we've
got
our
next
step
for
this
one
anyway,
so
I
think
it'll
be
like.
Let's
see
what
that
that
comes
up
with
it
was
kind
of
where
I
was
going
versus
diving
into
one
of
the
topics
right
now
and
next
next
time
we
can
take
a
look
at
that
and
figure
out
our
next
steps.
A
You
know
and
yeah
it
may
or
may
not
include
a
survey
depending
on
what
we
think
makes
sense
in
terms
of
what
it
looks
like
and
what
we
want
to
do
and-
and
I
would
say
that,
like
making
sure
that
we
understand
what
people
think
their
needs
are
is
like.
If
we're
going
to
only
do
one
survey,
that's
probably
the
one
that
would
the
broader
survey
that
one's
that's,
probably
the
one
that
would
make
sense.
A
So
yeah
yeah,
I'm
on
yeah.
That's
that's
what
I
was
thinking
coming
around
to
thinking
that
like
it's,
that
we
should
probably
map
these
technical
things
back
to
that
that
the
needs
and
and
yep
so
yep
make
sense.
I
think
we're
we're
thinking
along
the
same
lines.
So,
let's
let's
on
that
one!
This
basically
is
you
know
in
terms
of
today,
let's
park
the
technical
trends
and
areas
and
stuff
until
we
get
that
extra
input.
A
Okay,
so
we'll
do
that,
so
that's
for
the
key
technical
area
brainstorms.
I
think
we've
covered
that
unless
there's
something
else,
people
want
to
talk
about
on
that
front
today,.
A
If
not
the
needs
and
wants
of
constituencies,
I
think
we
touched
a
little
bit
on
that
already.
You
know:
we've
agreement
to
launch
in
march,
let's
see
I'll,
say,
created
this
issue
to
track.
A
A
Okay,
so
is
there
anything
else,
people
want
to
talk
about
that
one,
I
think
otherwise,
it's
just
sort
of
next
step
is
to
do
that.
Get
that
survey.
D
A
Yeah
thanks
it's.
I
think
it
was
a
good
group
effort
to
get
that
into
something
that's
kind
of
useful
and
interesting.
So.
A
Okay,
so
then
the
last
thing
on
the
issue
was
the
next
ten
years
for
collaborators
that
we
agreed
to
wait
until
the
meeting
where
we
had
mary.
So
that's
the
end
of
what
we
have
on
our
agenda
for
today
and
we
only
have
13
minutes
left
anyway.
So
I
is
there
anything
that
we
should
talk
about
before
we
close
out
or
should
we
give
people
back
a
few
minutes.
D
A
It
was
a
week
earlier
than
it
might
have
been
because
we
were
working
to
avoid
like
overlapping
there's
some
other
alternating
meeting
right.
So
we
changed.
We
changed
it
to
always
be
this
time
instead
of
multiple
meetings.
Just
because
we
we
felt
that
trying
to
push
it
to
the
middle
of
the
eastern
time
zone.
We'd
get
you
know
more
people
from
the
pacific
side
like
yourself
as
well
as
people
in
europe.
D
Yeah
this
one
worked
out.
Well,
so
I'm
I
think
it's
good.
I
I
think
the
reason.
One
of
the
other
reasons
why
I
hadn't
been
coming
to
a
couple
is
the
the
new
team.
I'm
on
has
a
standing
meeting
that
was
conflicting
with
half
of
it
and
I
was
on
call
handoff
and
I
had
like
I
was
on
call,
so
I
had
to
go
to
it.
You
know,
but
this
doesn't
conflict
which
is
good.
Okay,
okay,
good.
A
If
not,
that's
great,
so
thanks
for
everybody's
time,
and
we
will,
you
know,
get
back
together
in
two
weeks
and
we
will
see
it
what
we
have
that
in
terms
of
the
extra
feedback
on
the
technical
brainstorm
and
potentially
also
look
at
the
sort
of
the
next
10
for
collaborators
that
side
of
things.