►
From YouTube: 2022-02018-Node.js Node-API Team meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
And
we
can
get
started
so
the
first
one
is
drive
towards
full
coverage
so
jack.
I
don't
know
if
there's
anything
to
update
in
terms
of
that
one.
A
Jack,
if
you're
speaking,
you
are
on
mute,
maybe.
B
A
Okay,
so
he's
opened
that
there
and
yeah
you
can
link
that
in
the
chat.
Maybe.
C
Yesterday
we
received
a
one
contribution.
We
have
upper
requests
that
added
a
new
test
for
object.
Not
the
object
right
is.
C
C
I
I
think
that
we
already
merged
it.
Yeah.
A
Okay,
so
that
one
right-
okay,
great
so
thanks
very
much
to
I'm
gonna-
probably
not
get
this
right,
but
zwang
gang
may
so
thanks
and
looking
forward
to
more
contributions
like
that,
that's.
B
The
coverage
is
less.
Is
there
a
way
to
find
out
the
coverage
code
coverage
we
don't
currently
have
coverage
runs.
A
That
that
would
be
a
great
thing
to
set
up.
We
do.
We
do
do
code
coverage
like
for
for
node.
We
do
coverage
like
this,
so
we
have
like
the
javascript
coverage
and
c
plus
coverage,
and
that
actually
gives
us.
You
know
a
really
good
way
to
look
for
where
there
isn't
coverage
and
closing
it.
In
addition
to
what,
like
you
know,
jack
has
put
together,
we've
got
a
good
list
of
places
where
we
we
just
know
we
need
to
do
but
okay,
perfect
yeah.
If
there's
any
interest
in
adding
code
coverage.
C
The
same
tools,
no,
that
we
use
in
node
core
to
estimate
the
the
the
coverage
if
it's
possible.
A
Yeah,
there's
sort
of
two
parts
to
that:
one
is
the
the
c
plus
plus
coverage
and
then
the
javascript
side
of
coverage.
I
think
in
our
case,
it's
mostly
like
the
c
plus
that
we
would
care
about
right,
yeah,
because
the
javascript
is
all
just
test
code,
if
I
remember
correctly,
or
so,
but
yeah
it
uses
and
it
uses
like
gcov
or
something
like
that.
A
fairly
standard
tool,
so
yeah
that
would
be
a
good
way
to
start,
is
to
look
at
what
we're
doing
over
there
and
possibly,
you
know
recreate
that.
C
A
Sure
that's
a
great
idea,
so
like
add
code
coverage,
and
I
think
I
can
find
the
link
so
like
in
node.
If
I
get
to
the
right
place.
A
C
There,
for
now.
C
No,
maybe
everyone
could
add,
maybe
later.
C
Okay,
well,
that's
good
good
news
and
yeah.
We
maybe.
C
Need
to
close
the
issue
that
track
the
the
object,
an
app
object.
C
C
That,
because
we
at
the
top,
we
have
the
issue
936
yeah,
it's
linked
here.
So.
B
D
C
I
want
to
be
sure
that
yeah,
it's
all
covered
now
so.
C
Okay
has
got
delete,
instance
of
and
the
okay,
the
operator
so.
A
C
C
A
A
Yep
right,
okay,
so
I
think
that's
accurate
if
other
people
want
to
take
a
look
afterwards
just
to
confirm,
but
then
the
other
ones
are
still
like
get
and
so
forth.
So
maybe
we
can
even
comment
on
so
like
these.
I
think
we
still.
We
could
come
check
double
check
and
comment
that
those
we
still
think
need
tests
as
well.
A
Okay
but
yeah,
I
know
that's
good
news
that
we've
got
somebody
who's
starting
to
contribute
there
and.
A
Hi
anything
else
we
want
to
talk
about
on
that.
That
point
I
don't
know
jack.
If
you're
you're,
mike's
working
now,
yeah
yeah.
G
I
think
so
I
think
that's
about
it.
Also
me
and
nicola
we
saw
like
the
window
see
I
broke
last
yesterday:
okay,
we
temporarily
rolled
back
to
use
windows,
2019
and
yeah
yeah.
H
What's
the
the
the
issue
there
or
I
think
yeah.
C
C
It's
it
struck.
If
you
go
another
done
api
in
the
in
in
the
I
think
that
it's
the
last
issue,
closet.
C
Okay,
yeah
and
the
issue
in
node,
I
added
the
reference
to
the
issue
on
the
guitar
backgrounds
and
not
jeep
okay,
to
be
solved.
Yeah.
A
Okay,
that's
great
I'm
just
looking
here,
just
as
a
reminder
like
I
guess
at
some
point,
oops
that
didn't
work
last
night
yeah,
that's
not
good!
I
wonder
why.
A
D
C
D
C
I
did
you,
you
landed
the
the
cost.
I
think
the
the.
C
A
C
Yes,
yeah
yeah
yeah
correct
when
we
need
to
merge
something
that.
D
C
That
could
be,
if
you
don't
have
time
next
time,
ping
me
and
I
I
I
I
can
do
this
okay
sounds.
A
C
A
Okay,
okay,
so
we
will
maybe
I'll
even
open
an
issue
as
a
reminder:
yeah
yeah,
just
in
terms
of
like,
if
it's
the
c
reminder
in
terms
of
the
ci
oops
node,.
I
D
A
Just
trying
to
get
back
to
our
okay,
so
this
one,
I
guess
anything
else
on
to
discuss
on
this
one
before
we
move
on.
A
Stale
issues:
let's
take
a
look
at
what
word,
how
we're
doing
there
so,
okay,
so
kevin
you
added
this
one.
Do
you
want
to
lead
us
through
this
discussion.
I
A
Okay,
so
I
guess
this
one
was
already
discussed
last
meeting
which
I
could
make,
but
is
there
any
any
more
things
that
need
to
be
discussed,
or
I
guess
it
says-
yeah
we'll
discuss
again
next
week
when
we
have
more
members.
A
Maybe
we'll
I
don't
know
if
people
have
thoughts,
otherwise,
maybe
we'll
defer
to
next
week
and
yeah.
I
think
that
it's
a
good
idea.
A
A
C
If
the
code
names-
oh
you,
you
landed,
the
call
dot
call
override.
I
I
think.
C
Call
yeah,
if
with
constructor
or
no
or
non-constructor,.
C
A
Okay,
so
yeah
I'll
take
another.
I
guess
I'll
look
at
that
one
first
to
see
if
it
was
related
to
the
other
other
failures,
but
okay,
so
this
one
still
there.
A
C
So
he
he
wants
to
remove
the
the
iterator.
C
D
F
F
A
Sorry,
I'm
back
anything
else
we
should
put
on
there
in
terms
of
notes
or
anything.
C
No,
for
no,
no,
no
okay!
Let's
go
back.
A
I'm
just
looking
at.
I
think
this
one
is
pretty
much
ready
to
go
unless
people
have
you
know
if
people
want
to
take
another
look,
there's
one
one
commit
with
the
changes
in
the
you
know:
do
the
linter
and
then
the
separate
ones
related
to
adding
the
the
other
override,
which
I
think
we'd
looked
at
before
so.
A
All
right,
I
think
now,
if
I
look
at
this,
is,
is
now
passing.
C
Could
you
hug
me
so
I
try.
I
try
to
test
on
the
ci
that
okay,
that.
G
Yeah,
I
think
I
sent
everyone
an
email
so
pretty
much.
What
I've
done
so
far
is.
I
think
I
tried
to
achieve
like
something
so
at
first,
like
I
just
landed
that
patch
against
the
latest
v14
staging
and
like
commented
out
code
that
like
doesn't
make
it
compile
and
made
notes
of
like
sort
of
dependencies.
D
G
Those
those
will
probably
have
and
sort
of
achieve
a
sort
of
baseline
and
then
sort
of
gradually
start
picking
off
at
a
sort
of
dependencies.
I
could
look
into
backboarding
and
yeah
and
that's
quite
large
and
I
think
right
now
I
have
an
issue
with
like
yeah.
If
you
guys
look
at
the
email,
it's
like
is
isolate,
promise,
hooker
or
something
and
looks
like
it's
coming
from
torque
and
I'm
not
sure
what
else
you
can
do
to
what
else.
I
can
do
to
address
that
issue
and
yeah.
A
G
Yeah,
like
I
think
my
own
experience,
it's
looking
like
I've
already
changed
like
63
files
and
like
2
000,
something
lines
of
code.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
something
that.
G
A
Like
unless
we
think
it's
really
critical,
I'm
kind
of
like
yeah,
I
think
we
that's
too
big
a
change
to
like
the
risk
reward.
Just
isn't
there
it's
good,
it's
fixed
in
like
later
versions,
but
that
yeah,
okay,
but
yeah
thanks
for
investigating
and
and
I
guess
we
could
sort
of
close
out
in
the
email
in
terms
of
that
that
choice
or
not,
yeah
sure,
okay,.
A
A
You
know
interesting
at
least
maybe
you
probably
looked
at
this
last
week,
but
I
I
did
find
it
was
interesting
that
there's
some
more
information
in
terms
of
the
modules
and
what
they
use
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff.
A
F
A
One
that
you've
already
looked
at
nick,
so
I
guess
that
one
I
mean
those
don't
look
like
they
need
any
help
or
discussion
really.
C
In
on.
A
C
Okay,
I
saw
that
you
made
a
pr,
that's
good
me,
I
I
I
just
propose,
but
I
don't
know
if
it's
it's.
A
It's
okay,
so
I'll,
take
a
look
at
the
comments
and
like
suggest,
incorporate
them
or
whatever
so
yeah
that
one
it
was
dipped
from
that
other
pr,
so
yeah
I'll
I'll,
just
read
what
you've
got
there
this
one
I
had.
I
I
don't
quite
understand
well
enough
yet
so
I
don't
know
if
anybody
else
has
looked
at
that.
C
Have
passed
right
to
understand
why
we
need
to
add
the
section
pragma
section
for
the
module.
C
A
C
You
you
you
picking
me
about
the
p
requests
that
I
made.
C
But
before
that,
I
I
won't
discuss
if
it's
good
for
everyone
to
add
this
new
new
api.
C
Right,
like
yeah,
like
I
proposed
here,
because
here
there
were
some
comments
that
yeah
about
the
name
or
essentially.
C
What
I
remember
is
that
this
new
api
is
very
similar
to
to
the
the
dpi
that
we
already
have.
C
C
So
in
the
future
will
not
be
defined.
Class
will
be
not
redefined
class
with
length-
I
I
I
don't
know
or-
and
so
I
I
I
can
in
this
week,
I
can
work
to
these
forecast
and
maybe
we
fought
the
team
we
can
discuss.
What
is
the
best.
A
Right,
yeah
yeah,
I
like
it,
do
we
like
nappy,
define,
class
new
or
something
like
yeah
like
is
the
length?
Is
the
length
really
the
thing
that
we
want
to
bundle
into
the
name
or
do
we
just
want
to
say
this
is
the
new
one
that
you
should
use
and
we
won't
necessarily
remove
the
other
one,
but
we
could
like
remove
it
from
some
of
the
documentation
or
like
put
it
into
the
deprecated
side
of
the
documentation.
C
Okay
yeah,
it
says
it
seems
good
for
me.
Okay,
so.
A
Is
there
any
way
like,
I
guess,
there's
in
c,
there's
probably
no
way
to
just
automatically
fill
in
the
default
now
anyway,
okay
yeah,
I
think
that's
worth
considering
like
if
we'd
started.
Would
we
just
have
one
method
that
has
that
additional
parameter,
in
which
case
like
we
might
want
to
say
it's
like
you
know,
not
be
defined
class.
A
Up
a
pr,
that's
great,
I
was
just
going
through
and
doing
like
like
triage
day
so
that
one
came
out
tonight.
C
C
You,
okay,
fingered,
all
the
team,
I
think
about
hey
about
the
tracy
function:
okay,
I'm
not
an
expert
or
tracer
function,
but
what
I
understood
in
that
issue?
C
A
C
Yeah,
so
what
I
saw
the
the
code
posted
by
brooklyn
here
and.
C
Of
reference
that
they
they
have
and
yeah
this
is,
they
are
asking
for
on
api
that
do
these
for.
D
C
So
yeah
the
the
approach
could
be
to
add
a
new
tread
safe
api,
because
at
one
point
here
we
need
to
maintain
then.
C
The
number
reference
you
know
that
we
have
right
and-
and
their
point
is,
that
this
kind
of
operation
should
be
part
of
the
c
api.
It's
a
responsibility
of
the
c
api,
not
of
who
are
creating
binding
or
cbs,
plus
binding
or
rust,
binding
or
whatever
right,
yeah.
A
A
You
should
be
able
to
get
like
it
shouldn't
go
away
until
you've
called
release
right,
but
you
can't
call
it
more
than
once.
C
Okay,
because
if
you
call
more
than
once
it's
it's
you,
you
don't
get
any
any
error
at
the
end.
Just
because
you
will
get
nabi
close.
I
don't
remember
not
being
closing
sorry
just
trying
to
get
back.
Maybe.
A
C
Wrap
the
tracer
function
and
you
don't
release
it's
it's
a
problem
no,
and
they
need
to
do
these
in
their
code.
Implementing
what
do
we
call
this
destructor
in
c
plus,
plus
it's
a
draw.
It's
a
trait
called
a
drop,
and
in
that
particular
function
they
need
to
called
the
the
there
is
function.
So
maybe
they
want
to
avoid
this,
so
he
want
maybe
something
that.
D
Destroy
itself,
sorry,
I
have
to
take
this
call
I'll
just
be
a
second.
D
C
E
A
Okay,
sorry
about
that,
it's
got
lots
going
on
these
days.
I'm
sorry!
What
what
were
we
saying
nicola.
C
C
Have
to
to
do
anything,
so
if
you,
for
example,
stop
the
brushes
they
free
the
memory.
Oh.
C
You
don't
need
to
do
this
in
your
our
code,
so
maybe
this
is
the
the
requests
I
I
I
fee.
I
think.
A
D
C
You
too,
yes,
and
I
I
don't
know
if
I
have
the
time
or
heard
the
knowledge,
but
I
can
try.
A
C
I
I
I
I
I
I
won't
try
and
because.
C
D
A
To
create
the
test
as
well:
yeah,
okay,
great
any
other
ones-
that
you
think
we
should
talk
about.