►
From YouTube: Node.js N-API Team meeting - Aug 24 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
C
I
remember
seeing
several
where
we
were
all
available,
although
that
may
have
changed.
D
C
C
Oh
oh,
wait
a
minute.
This
is
this:
is
an
eastern
time
zone
right,
yeah.
C
C
Thursday
11
a.m
to
12.
I
don't
know
why
I
didn't
mark
that,
but
because
that's
eight
eight
am
here
right
so
august
6
11
to
twelve.
I
think
I
should
have
marked
that
one,
because
I
think
I'm
okay
with
that
one,
because
I
mean
it's
eight
o'clock
on
monday
right
now
for
me,
so
right,
eight
o'clock
on
thursday
is
probably
okay.
The
only
thing
is
like
I'm
for
the
next
couple
of
weeks,
I'm
on
vacation,
thursdays
and
fridays,
but
but
other
than
that
you
know.
C
A
D
Yeah
would
we
have
to
see
if
there's
a
conflict
on
the
council.
A
Yeah,
let's
take
a
look
at
the
calendar
here
right,
nodejs.org
because
yeah,
I
think
some
of
them.
C
Thursday
nodejs
community
committee.
A
D
B
C
If
what
let's
make
sure
that
the
time
zone
we're
looking
at
is
okay,
because
this
one
says
8
am
node.js
and
api,
so
it
looks
like
this
calendar
is
showing
things
in
pacific
time.
C
A
Point,
why
is
that.
C
B
C
Don't
know
why
this
is
well,
I
can
I
can
open
the
doodle.
Can
you
paste
the
link
and
then
I
I
maybe
I
can
share
the
screen
because
then
my
mind
is
in
pacific.
A
D
C
C
B
C
E
D
C
Yeah,
there's
also
friday
at
8
a.m
that
one
that
one,
I
think
is
again
missing
me.
But
again
I
can
probably
do
that.
I
don't
know
why
I
didn't
put
those-
maybe
I
didn't
scroll
far
enough
yeah,
I'm
actually,
okay
with
that
too.
So
so,
if
we
have
nothing
on
friday
at
eight,
I'm
fine
with
that
yeah.
I
guess
I
didn't
scroll
far
enough,
because
there
were
more
dates
here
so
yeah.
I
don't
know
why.
I
didn't
mark
thursday
and
friday
the
same
times
as
monday,
tuesday,
wednesday.
C
A
A
E
D
B
A
C
A
A
B
A
A
E
C
A
A
A
A
A
D
Yes,
he
did
respond
in
his
regarding
pr
766,
okay
yeah.
So
he
said
that
is
just
working
on
it
and
it's
coming
back
after
vacation,
I'm
hoping
to
end
it
soon.
So
it's
still
working.
A
A
Good
okay,
oops
and
then
let's
look
at
what's
new
fix
leak
in
thread
safe.
I
think
progress,
worker.
C
Oh
wait
a
minute:
if
you
delete
this
in
in
on
work
progress,
then
what
happens
when
you
want
to
call
complete.
D
Yeah:
okay,
as
far
as
cool
my
thread
say,
function
is
also
ready.
Okay,
okay,
nice.
D
So
what
I
did
was
updated
the
basically
the
tests
now
are
just
a
port
of
the
existing
tsfn
to
go
to
tsfn
ex
now,
okay,
and
then
I
also
made
another.
I
updated
the
other
branch,
the
other
pr,
which
is
a
the
backing
of
the
old
tsfn
with
the
new
tsfn
ex,
which
works,
but
it
doesn't
compile
on
gcc.
Four.
F
D
That
label
there,
okay
yeah,
so
once
we
decide
to
update
to
gcc
five
plus,
which
would
be
when
node
10
goes
out
right,
can
use
this
one.
Instead.
F
A
F
Right
right
and
then
the
examples
repo
is
linked
off
the
head
of
of
each
website
page.
A
C
A
C
Yeah
yeah,
it's
I
mean
it.
It
does
probably
have
performance
implications,
but
it
is
cosmetic
otherwise
just
to
make
it
cleaner,
because
I
mean
we're
probably
using
a
lot
more
promises
with
this
change
than
without
it.
But
but
it
doesn't
matter
because
these
are
tests
rather
than
benchmarks
right.
So.
A
D
Yeah
for
what
it's
worth,
I
used
that
version
of
the
test
in.
A
D
D
A
B
A
C
C
Okay,
all
right
yeah-
I
I
can
I
can.
I
can
run
it
again.
B
A
A
It
may
be
something
like
because
it's
well
if
it's
rebased
it
should
now
have
all
the
current
stuff
anyway.
I
think
that's
about
it
here.
Let's
take
a
look
at
node.
C
Yeah
yeah,
because
I
like
the
the
overarching
thing
that
I'm
doing
here
is,
is
answering
that
there's
a
closed
issue
about
the
person
wanting
wondering
how
to
iterate
over
an
array
or
sorry
how
to
assign
things
to
an
array
and
our
documentation
for
array
never
mentions
that
it
inherits
from
object.
So,
if
you
go
to
like.
F
C
It
doesn't
say
it
inherits
from
object
and
therefore
you
can
use
the
set
method,
and
so
I
figured
we
should
for
for
for
each
class.
We
should.
We
should
introduce
like
like
how
it
fits
into
the
hierarchy
right.
F
C
The
class
heading
and
then
when
I
was
doing
that,
I
I
added
I
added
references
to
dog
basic
types,
md
hash
value,
and
then
I
saw
that
there's
a
value
md,
which
documents
the
exact
same
thing.
So
I'm
not
sure
why
we
have
this
in
two
places.
So
basic
types
is
more
of
an
overarching
documentation
right,
but
it
goes.
It
goes
into
great
detail
for
value
for
some
reason.
A
C
C
F
C
Well,
it
is,
it
is
it,
it
is
the
top
of
a
rather
large
hierarchy
of
classes,
so
it's
about
as
basic
as
it
gets,
but
but
you
know
it's
documented
in
two
places
now.
C
No,
no,
no!
It's
it's
it's!
Well,
it's
the
representation
of
a
javascript
value
right.
So
so
it's
you
know
it's
it's
just
how
we
chose
to
do
this.
It
did.
A
C
Yeah,
okay,
so
I'll
just
leave
myself
a
note
here.
A
F
C
Yeah,
that's
that
that
that's
another
question
like
so
you
at
at
the
top
of
one
of
the
files
we
have.
We
have
a
bunch
of
types
listed
with
with
all
links
to
their
own
files.
I
think
it's
oh
geez,
which
one
is
it
a
doc.
C
Yeah
yeah
there's
that
so
so
like,
for
example,
string
and
string
and
and
the
name
can
go
under
or
sorry
string
and
symbol
can
go
under
name
and
that's
kind
of
stuff.
So
we
could
actually
reflect
this,
but
the
question
is:
if
would
it
make
sense
to
add
the
the
hierarchy
to
every
single
page
and
then
just
have
the
one
that
you're
currently
looking
at
not
be
a
link
and
all
the
others
building?
C
We
have,
we
have
kind
of
an
inconsistency
like
like
object,
has
its
own
file
but
array.
Doesn't
you
know
I.
C
C
And
yeah
string
and
symbol
they
have
it.
I
think
oh
yeah
object.
Has
it
yeah
array
doesn't
so
we
just.
A
C
A
A
Yeah
and
it
kind
of
looks
like
we
may
have
had
it,
we
may
have
just
had
basic
types
at
one
point,
but
then,
as
we
started
to
add
them,
yeah
exactly.
C
C
F
A
C
C
Well,
it
changes
signatures
and
stuff
like
that.
So
I
mean
it's
it's
an
abi
breakage,
but
other
than
that.
What
would
be
another.