►
From YouTube: Node.js N-API Team meeting - July 13 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
A
B
C
A
A
A
B
A
B
A
A
B
B
B
C
C
A
A
B
A
B
A
B
B
B
A
B
B
B
A
B
C
A
B
B
A
B
A
A
B
A
A
B
A
B
B
B
D
A
A
D
B
A
A
So
yeah
it's
this
one
where
this
one
came
in,
which
was
I.
Guess
we
don't
properly
support
relative
path.
So
if
there's
a
space
in
the
district
director,
III
that'll
cause
problems,
so
this
PR
fixed
it
and
I
guess
so.
I
we'd
had
some
discussion
in
the
issue
and
Nicola.
You
were
planning
to
do
a
release
this
week
right,
yeah,
I,.
E
A
E
B
A
B
A
B
F
A
A
B
Right,
yes,
yeah
there,
there
is
a
apparently
jeaious
dock
that
the
foundational
tool
that
everything's
built
on
is
not
amenable
to
parsing
anything
other
than
javascript.
So
it
has
heartburn
if
you
give
it
a
C++
file,
but
apparently
there
are
tweaks
that
you
can
make
to
it.
So
if
this
is
of
interest,
I
will
I
will
look
at
that
as
another
alternative
and
make
comments
here
and
I.
A
Because
I
was
I
was
looking
at
this
PR
from
Gabriel,
and
one
of
the
thing
I
think
that
actually
made
me
think
of
us.
That
could
be
cool
too.
Is
that
when
you
define
it,
it
basically
lets
you
have
a
C++
class
that
represents
your
add-on
and
then
because
you've
got
methods,
you
can
basically
say.
Okay
and
these
methods
are
part
of
my
add-on
right.
Yes,.
B
A
B
A
B
A
Even
you
could
go
so
far
and
we
might
be
able
to
go
as
far
as
like
for
the
parameter
is,
if
they're
documented
as
well.
So
you
know
we
could
write
today.
You
have
to
say
like
info,
dark,
V
info
dot,
zero
dot,
and
in
this
case,
like
you
know,
you
have
to
say,
as
snappy
cool
uncle
number,
if
we
actually
add
documentation.
That
said
it's
as
prime
number.
We
could
give
something
like
this,
which
would
you
know,
make
it
more
readable,
I.
A
A
B
D
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
D
I
have
a
small
update
on
the
thread-safe
function,
the
X
class
that
PR?
Let's
pull
that
open,
yeah
I'm,
pretty
much
finished
with
it
now,
just
fighting
with
the
CI
I
just
pushed
so
now,
I'm,
seeing
that
some
are
failing
and
some
are
not
so
I
like
that,
but
the
implementation
is
done
and
the
documentation
is
pretty
much
updated.
So
if
you.
A
A
D
I
mean
it
was
basically
it's
just
like
the
example
that
I
was
working
on.
I
was
trying
to
make
it
have
all
of
the
100%,
fully
featured
and
fully
rounded,
but
I
really
couldn't
I
was
having
troubles
with
the
abort,
because
the
example
was
a.
It
was
maybe
too
complicated,
or
something
and
I
was
just
getting
really
frustrated
with
it.
D
To
be
honest,
okay,
so
I
just
sort
of
removed
the
abort
possibility,
because
the
way
that
the
example
works
is
that
the
thread
the
function
that's
running
on
the
node
thread
can
return
a
promise
and
that
promise
needs
to
eventually
resolve.
But
that
promise
resolution
handler
is
added
in
the
call
j/s
callback.
But
it's
also
possible
that
the
thread
safe
function
can
be
finalized.
So
it
was
just
a
whole
mess
of
complexity.
D
A
A
A
A
A
F
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
C
A
A
I'm
willing
to
like
I'm,
very
I'm,
hopeful
that,
like
once,
we
went
from
one
to
two
I,
don't
know
it
was
a.
There
would
be
a
good
chance
like
that.
We
didn't
in
version
one
as
we
everything
was
version
one
until
we
actually
went
to
right
yeah
right.
We
didn't
have
like
a
there,
the
first
one,
if
you're
changing
things,
but.