►
From YouTube: Node.js N-API Team meeting - Sep 30 2019
Description
A
B
A
B
B
B
B
A
B
Now
the
thing
is,
is
anybody
in
any
of
the
users
that
are
using?
It
would
also
need
to
have
C
make
installed
along
with
their
their
toolkit,
so
that,
in
my
comment,
I
also
mentioned
pre-build,
as
pre-build
now
supports,
see
make
as
a
back-end.
So
if
you
do
just
a
link
it
hub-
and
you
do
just
a
little
bit
more
configurations,
then
you
can.
You
can
update
upload
binaries
to
github
as
releases
right.
E
A
B
A
F
A
F
G
A
F
A
A
E
B
A
G
A
B
B
A
Kind
of
a
different,
it's
kind
of
a
different
thing
in
that
you
know
we
don't
have
to
tie
together
what
we
build
node
core
with
how
native
add-ons
are
built.
Okay,
although
there
is
you
know,
there
is
some
synergy
in
that.
It's
it's
nice!
If,
if,
for
example,
if
we're
building
node
core
we'll
see
make-
and
we
have
expertise
with
that-
maybe
it's
good
that
modules
are
built
there.
Yeah.
B
A
D
A
A
A
I
can't
find
it
I
mean
I'd
open
this
in
the
past,
OGG
condition
to
move
to
see,
make
for
building
nodejs
and
Ben.
Nor
house
is
looking
at
that.
I
just
don't
know
how
quickly
or
where
he's
at
right
now,
but
that's
one
of
the
options
it
is
being
considered
like
GN
is
the
other
one
that's
been
mentioned.
I
haven't
heard
too
much
about
that
recently.
Alright,.
A
But
I
think
it's
definitely
good
that
you
know
if
we
can
clarify
here's,
how
you
would
do
it
if
you
want
to
use
something
different
and
and
you've
done
that
and
I
don't
know.
Is
there
anything
like
links
on
the
node
N
on
API
repo
that
makes
sense
or
documentation
for
node
core?
That
would
make
sense.
I.
A
A
F
B
A
A
A
F
A
How
do
people
typically
build
add-ons
right,
like
even
the
well,
you
know
the
most
common
way
is
people
just
have
them
build
out
on
install
right,
and
you
know
here's.
You
know
the
things
that
used
to
do
that,
build
or
see
making
note
whatever,
and
you
know
the
alternate
which
is
sometimes
use,
but
you
know
different
is
people
will
actually
use
a
pre
build
and
ship,
binaries
and
I
think
some
documentation.
That
explains
that,
and
has
some
references
might
be,
may
be
good.
A
B
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
B
G
A
D
A
Right
so
this
one
okay
yeah,
so
there
I
guess
it
sounds
like
Oh
had
only
got
so
far
in
his
proof
of
concept
and
even
alleys.
Kind
of
moved
on
to
another
project
I'll
have
to
follow
up.
I
did
get
a
link
from
ally
with
some
of
the
stuff
that
they'd
worked
on.
I
just
need
to
ask
him
if
I
can
share
it
publicly
here.
A
A
D
G
F
A
Yeah
I
think
it
was
actually
a
little
while
ago
there
was
yeah
like
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
so
we
definitely
need
to
review.
I
did
I
I
thought.
I
was
a
little
worried
that
some
of
the
like
the
standard
locking
might
have
been
too
new
for
some
of
the
older
compilers,
but
it
seems
to
actually
run
and
built
fine,
so
I
guess
not,
which
is
good
and
yeah.
If
we
can
just
take
time
to
review
a
little
bit
more
in
detail,
that
would
be
good.
D
F
F
A
F
A
F
D
B
D
A
E
E
E
F
F
A
A
A
D
D
F
F
A
One
one
thought
like
that:
there's
this
call
for
a
code
and
learn
I,
wonder
if,
if
we,
if
it
makes
sense
to
proposal
session
where
basically
it's
a
code
on
learn
on
working
to
create
new
tests
for
no
doubt
on
API,
that
makes
sense
to
anybody
right
like
it
would
be
kind
of
like
a
little
bit
of
an
intro
and
then
hey.
Let's
here's
can
you
write
a
test
for
this
one?
Can
you
write
a
test
for
that
one,
and
then
you
know
we'd
work
with
people
as
they
try
to
write
tests.
A
F
F
D
D
F
F
F
E
B
A
A
D
B
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
B
A
B
D
E
D
B
B
F
F
G
E
Yeah,
it's
a
very
good
but
a
little
I.
Don't
think
that
will
be
very
Belleville
trying
to
teach
these
people
who
is
rusty
and
to
push
them
to
read
the
documentation,
because
when
you
are
renewing
something
you
used
to
follow
tutorials
and
do
not
understand
something.
Well,
it's
happening
behind
that.
So
we'll
be
nice
to
read
official
documentation
like
source
for
learning.
You
know
you
are
learning
for
the
official
source
of
truth,
not
brightness,
making
tutorials
so
we'll
be
nice
and
push
people
to
read
documentation
and
that
cool
maybe
create
new
contributions
to
improve
documentation.