►
From YouTube: 2022-06-30 - Node.js Release Working Group Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
Yep,
so
everyone
should
keep
an
eye
out
for
those
and
upgrade
when
they
can.
A
Not
sure
there's
any
other
announcements
today
so
move
straight
on
to
the
agenda
issues
as
per
usual.
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
go
through
the
schedules
last,
so
the
first
one
listed
was
the
periodic
table
doesn't
have
an
element
start
with
j.
I
know
we've
discussed
this
a
lot
a
few
times
and
I
think
what
we
need
is
just
to
go
through
the
options.
A
I
can
share
the
correct
tab
should
be
so
really.
J
is
close
and
q
is
probably
a
little
bit
further
away.
So
I
think
we
can
just
focus
on
j
for
now,
there's
general
consensus
that
we're
not
going
to
skip
a
letter,
so
we
need
to
find
something
and
suggestions.
In
the
past
meetings,
we've
said:
let's
have
a
small
poll,
maybe
a
github
poll
on
no
js
node,
but
we
just
need
to
check
that
our
group
here
is
okay
with
any
of
the
options
suggested.
A
So
it
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
skipping
letters,
but
then
there
are
some
suggestions
and
I'm
gonna
pronounce
all
of
these
incorrectly.
So
do
we
think
this?
Is
it
jabronium
or
is
that
a
joke
one?
A
C
Aren't
they
old
jokes,
it
looks
like
oh.
C
A
Well,
I
think,
by
looking
at
it.
All
of
these
are
like.
B
A
A
Maybe
give
another
release
meeting
just
for
people
to
say
hey.
I
have
this
burning
suggestion
that
should
really
be
considered,
but
I
I
think
generally,
it
seems
to
one
with
the
most
weight
in
the
issue
anyway.
So
we'll
stick
with
that,
and
just
state
polls
not
necessary.
Maybe
we
need
a
poll
for
one
of
the
other
letters
but
I'll.
Let
someone
else
heard
that
closer
to
the
time
so,
okay
and
the
other
agenda
issue
we
well
it
wasn't.
It
was
added
just
now
to
talk
about
was
a
streams
regression
in
node
16.
B
By
shouldn't,
I
mean
there
was
nothing
in
the
pr
that
suggested.
So,
yes,
it's
not
something
we
did
wrong.
It
was
just
not
tagged,
not
evaluated
or
tagged
correctly.
So
mateo's
asked
what
should
we
do
robert's
offered
to
look
at
whether
well
just
looking
at
it?
I
kind
of
feel
we
kind
of
need
guidance
from
the
streams
team
as
to
what
the
correct
behavior
should
be.
A
Yeah
matteo's
latest
comment
saying
we
might
want
to
revert
to
the
original
behavior,
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
overall
or
16
or
so
I
guess.
Fortunately,
we've
got
security
releases
on
tuesday,
so
hopefully
by
you
know
by
next
week.
We
might
have
some
resolution
on
this
pr
of
what
we
need
to
do,
hopefully
in
time
for
the
next
16
release.
If
we
need
to
do
anything.
B
Yeah
but
yeah
I
it
kind
of
feels
that
we
need
some
sort
of
guidance
from
the
streams
team
and
then
make
a
decision
after
that,
because
whatever
whatever
we
do,
I
revert
all
you
know,
the
breaking
change
has
already
landed,
so
revert
would
be
another
breaking
change
to
go
back
to
the
pre-16
14
behavior
yep,
so
yeah.
It
depends
whether
the
stream's
streams
group
relief,
that's
the
right
thing
to
do
for
lts.
A
So
maybe
in
this
one
I
just
need
to
comment
and
say
disgusting
release
call
we
are
planning
to
do
a
note,
16
release
at
some
point
in
july,
and
it
would
be
good
to
know
if
we
need
to
even
include
a
river
or
an
alternative
pr
before
our
release.
A
So
for
18
we
had
juan.
Do
you
want
a
release
soon,
but
I
think
we
probably
need
to
bump
that
looking
timings.
E
E
And
I
have
proposed
myself
to
do
a
security
release,
so
I
don't
think
that.
A
A
Is
it
okay,
yeah
that
sounds
good
yeah?
I
think
that
works
and
do
you
think
you'll
have
time
at
that
point.
One.
A
So
where
are
we
at?
There
will
be
an
interim
release
in
here.
D
A
D
Or
the
actually,
I
need
to
check,
but.
A
D
Opened
as
a
cell
change
was
only
in
openness,
ssl,
three,
I'm
not
sure
if
it
would
be
a
breaking
change
in
open
ssl.
One.
A
A
D
A
B
A
B
A
Just
pull
these
open,
I
think
we
might
have
discussed
a
few
of
these
14
patches
before
my
gut.
Is,
I
probably
don't
want
to
land
the
streams?
One
and
just
say:
oh,
we're
all
a
bit
hesitant.
Should
this.
You
know
at
this
point
in
maintenance.
Should
we
just.
B
A
Yeah
to
go
up
yeah,
okay,
so
that's
like
those
bottom,
two
like
probably
not
gonna
land
middle
one.
If
we
can
land
it
cleanly
and
it
passes,
we
probably
would
would
go
for
it,
but
it's
not
urgent
and
the
later
one.
I
think
I
got
the
impression
seen
the
comment
that
some
folks
feel
strongly
about
this
going
in
14..
A
Yeah
too
far
away
yeah
and
it's
got
the
lts
watch
label.
So
we
should
pick
it
up
sounds
good,
but
it
takes
some
time
to
go
for
it
blow
through
anyway,
so
cool
and
I
think
that's
it.
So
we
we've
got
volunteers
for
the
security
releases
next
week
and
follow-up
releases
for
18,
16
and
14..
So
we
get
there
anything
else.
I
think
richard.
B
A
The
grant
releases
access
to
related
tooling
this
one.
B
C
A
Cool
anything
else,
anyone
wants
to
go
through.
That's
on
a
release,
issue
list.
A
Yes,
yes,
it's
possibly
worth
creating
yeah
creating
one
of
those
we
do
have
some.
Some
of
the
steps
have
the
security
specifics
in
it,
but
it
is
missing
like
someone
doing
a
security
release
for
the
first
time,
couldn't
probably
go
to
our
releases
md
guide
and
just
do
a
security
release
so
yeah
it
got
a
gap
there
and
it'd
be
good
to
track.
It.
A
No
without
this
case
thanks
everyone
for
joining
we're
all
scheduled
for
releases
all
set
for
volunteers
for
the
security
release
next
week.
So
I
think
we
can
end
it.
There.