►
From YouTube: 2021-09-30-Node.js Technical Steering Committee meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Okay,
so
we're
live.
Welcome
to
the
node.js
technical
steering
committee
meeting
for
september,
30th
2021,
as
rich
mentions.
We
don't
necessarily
see
everybody
who's
here,
because
the
way
zoom
works
and
cameras,
but
we
have
you,
know
rich
myself,
danielle,
robert
and
mary
at
this
point
and
others
may
join
at
some
point
before
we
get
started
started
with
the
agenda
that
was
in
issue
number
1087.
A
A
No
problem,
I
know
what
you're
thinking
of
the
other
thing
on
the
board
front.
I
don't
think
I
don't
have
any
updates
no
board
updates
this
week
and
I'm
not
really
aware
of
anything
that
we're
waiting
on
that's
no
project,
so
we
will
move
on
to
the
issues
in
terms
of
the
first
issue,
so
meta
move
one
or
more
collaboratives
to
emeritus.
I
know
rich
you've
been
driving
that.
A
Okay,
the
next
one
is
module,
unflagged,
import
assertions.
This
is
39921.
A
I
think
it
was
just
last
week,
although
it
might
have
been
before
then
we
switched
over
the
nodejs.org
repo,
which
took
a
little
bit
of
coordination
between
build
and
so
forth,
and
I
think
there's
one
or
two
others
that
we've
switched
over.
So
we're
nearing
the
point
where
they're
you
know
we're
going
to
have
to
think
more
about
core,
but
not
quite
there.
Yet.
C
I
haven't
followed
up
so
much
on
this.
I
think
the
last
thing
my
last
time
I
heard
it
was
going
to
be
some
proposals
on
what
we
would
vote
on.
B
A
Okay,
so
that's
good
deps
update
open
a
cell
to
quick,
tls
openness
to
cell
3.0.0
that
one
I
added
to
the
agenda.
The
openssl
3
has
gone.
A
We
need
to
propose
we,
you
know,
we
need
to
pull
it
into
18
because,
based
on
the
current
schedule,
18
would
go
out
of
service
before
the
the
end
of
life
of
1.0
or
sorry
one
dot.
Whatever
the
version
is
that
we're
using
of
open
ssl,
I'm
getting
it
wrong,
but
that
version
will
go
out
of
and
it
will
go
end
of
life
before
18
would
go
end
of
life,
so
I
don't
think
we
can
use
it
in
18..
We
do
to
have
a
choice
for
17.
A
B
Beth
is
doing
the
17.00
release.
Right,
yes,
has
she
weighed
in
on
it.
B
A
B
A
I
think
we've
already
mentioned
it
to
her
and
I
haven't
heard
any,
but
it's
good
to
hear
from
her
directly
so
okay
that
takes
us
then
to
to
be
or
not
to
be
in
core,
which
I
think
danielle.
You
you've
done
some
organization
yeah,
I'm
trying
to
remember.
If
danielle,
that
was
the
one
you'd
organized.
E
Yeah
that
was
me.
Can
you
hear
me
yep,
okay,
great
yeah,
that
was
me.
We
started
the
discussion
which
it
looks
like
there's
been
some
activity
on.
I
guess
I
don't
really
know
yeah.
I
think
the
discussion
is
still
going
on.
That's
what
kind
of
what
I'm
seeing
is
there?
I
haven't
really
talked
to
anyone
about
this
in
a
while.
So
is
there
anything
like
any
kind
of
like
time
limit?
E
We
should
put
on
this
or
kind
of
like
action
items
that
we
have
from
this
already,
because
I
think
after
the
last
meeting
the
action
item
was
to
create
a
conversation
which
we've
done
and
now
I
guess
I'm
just
not
sure
how
far
how
long
this
should
go
on
to
give
people
the
right
amount
of
time
to
kind
of
chime
in
it
looks
like
the
only
people
that
have
chimed
in
are
tst
members.
This
is
something
we
want
to
kind
of
push
collaborators
or
other
people
in
the
community
to
also
comment
on.
C
E
Yeah
we
had,
I
feel,
like
I've,
seen
a
couple
of
those
we've
seen
that
with
yarn
we've
seen
that
with
what's
the
other
one,
I
think
there's
a
discussion
about
eslint,
so
I
mean
do
we
think
that
that's
going
to
be
better
than
those
discussions
or.
C
A
B
Bill
for
that
yeah,
I
kind
of
I
kind
of
wish
bradley
was
here
to
talk
about
mine,
or
he
bradley
may
not
want
to
be
here
to
talk
about
my
bills.
A
A
Right
so
like
it's
kind
of
like
we've,
we've
tried
to
get
the
discussion
in
this
discussion.
There's
there's
some
issues,
there's
some
ideas
and
I'm
I
do
wonder
if
the
next
step
is
like
an
actual
pr
which
then
might
bring
in
more
of
the
collaborators,
and
you
know
that
tends
to
drive
more
discussion.
Sometimes.
A
B
C
Well,
I'm
a
little
unsure.
You
know,
because
this
is
so
few
people
have
engaged,
so
I'm
not
really
sure
what
they
are
consensus
and
non-consensus
like
me
personally,
I'm
in
the
view
that
it's
nicer
to
have
things
outside
of
core,
so
I'm
I'm
a
little
bit
on
the
opposite.
End
of
this,
like
I
don't
think
we
should
include
so
many
things
in
core
and
then
somebody
needs
to
argue
from
the
other
side
in
order
to
make
something
him
out
of
it.
C
I
think
bradley
would
be
good
to
have
a
discussion
there,
because
it's
like
a
little
bit
like
trot
rich.
You
and
me
had
a
little
discussion
there.
That
was
good.
B
A
B
All
right
well
well,
in
the
interest
of
I
mean
if
nobody
else
wants
nobody
else
for
doing.
Please
don't
let
me
take
this
off
of
someone
else's
plate
who
wants
it,
but
in
the
interest
of
just
moving
things
forward,
I
can
draft
something
and
like
it'll,
probably
not
get
consensus,
but
at
least
be
something
that
people
can
react
to
that
should
at
least
get
more
more
comments
from
the
tsc,
at
least,
if
not
others
yeah.
I.
B
Great
yep,
okay
I'll
I'm
gonna,
go
write
it
down
on
my
to-do
list
right
now,
pen
and
paper
old
fashioned.
Here
we
go
yeah,
okay,
I'll
take
that
for
next
week
sounds
good.
A
Okay,
that
takes
us
to
the
end
of
the
issues
that
we're
tagged
for
the
agenda.
We
can
quickly
flip
over
to
the
strategic
initiatives,
but
I
think
I
know
what
the
answer
is
going
to
be
there.
So
let
me
just
let
me
just
do
that
first,
though,
to
remind
me
the
list,
so
I
don't
forget.
A
B
E
A
So
I
guess
the
only
the
only
person
we
have
leading
a
strategic
initiative
is
is
right.
Now
is
mary
who's
here
any
update
on
future
build
chain
that
you
want
to
share.