►
From YouTube: Node.js Technical Steering Committee meeting
Description
B
A
A
couple
this
week,
first
one
is
just
to
remind
everybody
that
the
TSE
chair
director,
representative
nominations
are
open.
So
if
you
want
to
go
to
521,
if
you
want
to
nominate
yourself
or
anybody
else,
that's
the
place
to
go.
The
other
thing
is:
there's
an
enterprise
use
case,
an
enterprise
use
case
user
feedback
session.
This
Friday-
and
you
know
it
would
be
great-
to
have
more
people
from
the
TSC
to
be
there
to
sort
of
listen
to
what
those
that
group
of
users
is
telling
us
and
participate
in
the
discussion.
A
C
B
B
And
then
related
to
that
is
tracking
issue
for
runtime
deprecation
of
buffer
constructor
issue,
one
nine
zero,
seven,
nine,
the
steps
we
have
to
do
for
that
is
write
the
FAQ
which,
which
started
which
needs
more
input.
We
need
the
guide
on
how
to
my
grade,
which
Nikita
and
Anna
have
started.
I,
think
that
is
in
pretty
good
shape,
right,
I.
C
D
Not
sure
what's
missing
there,
but
I
don't
feel
that
it's
in
good
enough
shape
to
publish
it
from
know
Jess.
Perhaps
it
means
just
more
people
to
look
at
it
and
add
some
something
or
review.
What
is
it
written
there
I,
so
I
would
prefer
more
people
to
take
a
look
at
the
gradient
leave
comments
and
about
changes
in
their
age.
D
D
C
B
C
I
think
we
should
start
moving
having
that
gammon
having
that
guide
on
our
website
and
as
part
of
the
process
of
getting
it
on
the
website,
it
will
get
polished,
so
I
think
we
should
have
a
guide
bite.
Node
ten,
when
no
tango
goes
out,
should
have
a
guide.
Whatever
stage
that
guide
is
it's
to
some
extent
secondary.
B
B
D
A
D
A
B
A
B
A
B
B
B
D
D
D
B
B
F
So
no
new
board
meeting
since
the
last
TAC
meeting,
but
we
do
have
a
meeting
coming
up
on
the
30th,
so
that
would
be
a
week
Monday.
So
if
anyone
has
particular
things
they
want
brought
up
to
the
board
or
are
interested
in
finding
out
about
please
you
know,
let
me
know
and
I'll
make
sure
that
that's
handled
okay.
F
F
F
Modules
last
week,
we
kind
of
finished
the
process
of
collecting
user
stories
and
have
started
to
create
a
document.
That's
an
outline
of
future
sets
we're
going
to
be
having
another
meeting
next
week
of
going
through
and
finishing
off
that
list
of
features
before
we
define
the
features
of
the
implementation
feels
like
we're
getting.
You
know,
really
good
traction
the
group
and
getting
you
know,
really
close
to
defining
an
interface
which
is
kind
of
the
most
important
part
of
what
we're
doing
right
now.
F
A
So
this
worked
the
work
on
backporting,
two
six
and
eight
I
believe
six
landed
and
I.
Think
eight
was
pretty
much
ready
too.
So
that's
I
think
going
forward.
The
thing
I
mentioned
last
week,
which
I'll
mention
since
we
have
a
larger
group,
is
we
the
direction
we
agreed
was
to
actually
landed
as
experimental
insects.
There
were
some
changes.
A
We
work
a
little
bit
of
you
know
some,
a
small
number
of
changes
to
the
code,
so
we
thought
having
it
being
experimental
for
at
least
some
period
of
time
would
make
sense
and
then
we'll
need
a
larger
discussion
to
say.
Okay,
is
it
okay
to
move
it
out
of
experimental
because
we'll
be
in
the
maintenance
phase?
But
you
know
I
think
the
first
step
is
underway
to
get
it
out
there
and
let
people
start
using
it
across
the
versions.
Great.
A
He's
pushing
forward
on
getting
that
in,
as
you
mentioned
last
time,
it
would
be
like
1.1
only
I
think
there
was
a
few
wrinkles
around
azzam
in
terms
of
you
need
a
newer
Azzam
to
be
able
to
get
the
the
azzam
accelerated
code
in
the
new
version.
So
I
know,
I
know
that
cuz,
like
I'm
running
around
trying
to
get
that
new
as
I'm
on
to
the
the
IBM
machines
I
know,
rod
was
doing
it
on
those
other
machines.
F
A
F
I
I'm
bringing
this
up
because
I
mean
the
key
feels
like
there's,
been
a
pretty
strong
push
to
move
forward
with
getting
the
release
of
next
Tuesday
kind
of
no
matter
where
it's
at.
But
how
do
we
push
that
out?
If
we
don't
have
the
1.1
OpenSSL
stuff
in
there,
because
if
we're
still
on
1.0
point
to
the
end
of
life
on,
that
is
not
very
far
out,
which
was
kind
of
the
reason
what
we
started
on
this
to
begin
with,.
A
F
A
B
A
B
A
Like
I
tried
that
mentioning
a
couple
of
the
people
that
I
know
have
been
active
in
an
API
or
who
are
from
Microsoft
right,
but
it
doesn't
sound
like
they've
jumped
in
yet
so
I'll
try
and
ask
them
again
at
the
the
meeting
this
week.
But
if
just
anybody
else
has
any
people
they
can
reach
out
to
them.
H
G
B
I
H
I
I
I
I
I
C
I
H
A
H
J
H
F
Yes,
a
lot
of
the
LTS
and
especially
like,
if
you
look
at
the
inconsistencies
in
HTTP
too
right
now,
actually
a
lot
of
the
conflicts
are
in
like
conflicting
error
messages.
This
is
something
that's
very
useful
to
have
land
and
not
create
like
extra
conflict.
In
turn,
early
in
a
lifecycle
of
a
branch.
F
G
B
B
A
Like
I'm
wondering,
if,
if
we
don't
have
a
volunteer
now,
does
it
make
it
more
likely
that
we'll
get
a
volunteer
from
the
TAC?
If
there's
a
you
know
a
volunteer
in
the
diagnostic
group
to
sort
of
push
that,
and
we
just
need
a
liaison
to
you
know,
raise
things
to
the
TSC
that
need
that,
as
opposed
to
having
to
drive
the
whole
thing
that.
A
J
G
A
B
G
A
G
B
A
Yeah,
so
the
I
mean
I
think
it's
that
they've
agreed
to
follow
the
guidelines.
We
have
some
people
from
the
community
who
were
involved
there
and
the
feeling
of
you
know
basically
putting
them
there.
This.
This
was
perhaps
like
a
first
test
to
see.
If
we
can
do
this
kind
of
thing,
where
we
don't
have
to
run
the
whole
the
whole
environment,
but
can
be
involved
and
have
you
know
some
influence
through
the
the
admin's
as
as
a
way
to
you
know,
say
yeah,
the
are
moderation
policy
and
you
know
does
apply
there.
A
C
C
F
C
G
G
F
Jeremiah,
adding
on
to
that
Tracy
is
also
a
member
of
our
moderation
team.
So
it
seems
to
me
like
Tracy,
is
the
representative
who's
holding
that
up
Mateo?
You
were
saying
that
you
maybe
wanted
two
people
I
would
personally
say
that
since
the
TSC
and
calm
calm
through
men,
have
you
know
more
or
less
given
moderation
oversight
over
this
stuff
and
a
member
of
the
moderation
team
is
doing
it.
That
seems
to
me.
F
Efficient
I
guess
the
question
would
be
more.
If
you
want
more
than
one
individual,
it's
a
then
we
fold
down
to
be
more
than
money,
okay
and
then,
if
we
look
at
the
individuals
that
are
on
this
list
versus
our
general
collaborator
ship,
which
may
be
helpful,
so
Jordan
hardened
its
a
member
of
the
adminstered.
F
If
there's
someone
who
likely
should
be
considered
for
a
nomination
reasonably
soon,
Ari
is
on
there
as
well
who's
a
well-known
member
of
the
community,
but
is
not
a
collaborator.
So
it
seems
to
me
like
the
contentious
bit
and
then
Jeremiah,
please
correct
me.
If
this
doesn't
cover
your
urines
is
getting
another
person
involved.
Is.
C
B
B
G
C
G
So
I
just
want
to
like
so
I'm,
not
yeah,
agree,
Matteo,
I.
Don't
think
that,
like
we
should
be
doing
the
moderation,
that's
why
we
have
a
moderation
team,
but
if
we're
gonna
put
it
under
we're,
gonna
put
it
under
the
admin
scope
realistically
either.
I
think
it
should
be
moderated
by
our
moderate
Timur,
an
extension
of
it
or
it
should
have
like
a
moderation
team
that
functions.
G
F
There
is
a
bit
of
an
overlap
here
in
some
of
the
people
that
are
moderators
on
this
slack
as
well
as
moderators
inside
of
the
nodejs
IRC,
but
I
do
think
that
I
guess
that's
a
somewhat
kind
of
valid
either
concern
or
point
depending
the
angle
that
you
look
at
it,
that
should
we
be
holding
the
slack
more
accountable
than
the
IRC
or,
alternatively,
should
we
be
bringing
in
you
know
more
spaces
that
are
not
actively
moderated
to
the
extent
we'd
like
I'm
doing
that,
please
go
for
it.
I'm.
A
Just
gonna
add,
like
I
mean
you
know.
Ideally
we
would
have
you
know
unlimited
moderation,
resources.
We
could
have
our
team
moderate,
all
the
different
channels.
We
can
that's,
unfortunately,
not
the
case,
and
in
this
case
we
have
a
group.
Who's
agreed
to
basically
have
hold
our
moderation
standard,
and
you
know
it's
I
guess
it's.
If
that
model
can
work
or
basically
you
know,
another
group
is-
is
committed
to
upholding
the
standard
that
we've
set.
It'd
be
nice
to
see.
A
A
So
you
know
I,
guess
it's
like
I
see
it
as
a
as
a
net
plus.
If
we
support
those
work,
those
groups
who
are
gonna
say
yeah
well,
we'll
implement.
Your
moderation
will
put
admin's
on
your
into
our
organization,
as
opposed
to
just
saying.
Well,
unless
we
can
do
it
ourselves,
there's
just
not
going
to
be
any
moderation,
and
you
know
if
it
doesn't
work,
then
you
know
we
can
remove
them
right
and
say:
okay.
G
G
Sure,
I
guess
I
still
I
still
I
still,
don't
think
it's
it's
the
greatest
idea
for,
for
other
reasons,
I
mean
I.
Think
it.
If
fragments
are
real-time
communications
community,
as
it
were,
even
more
and
I
just
I,
don't
I
mean
I,
have
a
write-up
already
I'm.
Why
I,
don't
think
slack
is
a
really
great
tool
for
this
yeah.
A
F
F
Well,
it
may
not
be
you
know
the
perfect
space
in
Jeremiah
I
totally
hear
you
on
the
separating
the
real-time
communication,
but
I
think
that,
on
the
flip
side
of
that
well,
no
dev
is
really
good
for
us
to
communicate
about
organizing
internal
dev.
Hashtag
nodejs
is
not
necessarily
the
best
space
for
people
to
go
and
communicate
and
participate,
and
if
we
have
an
active
flourishing
slack,
it
seems
like
something
that,
if
we
have,
the
ability
to
help
mentor
and
help
guide
in
a
good
direction
is
something
that
we
should
try
to
do.
I.
A
A
Don't
know
that
we've
tried
any
that
there's
been
over
the
years.
Quite
a
bit
of
discussion
about
you
know
whatever
different
options,
there's
like
three
or
four
or
five
or
I,
don't
think
we
vet
people
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
I,
don't
think
we've
ever
gotten
to
the
point
of
setting
up
one
of
the
alternatives.
F
B
Maybe
everybody
could
have
a
look
at
know,
J
as
Edmund
49,
and
do
a
code
review
well.
Code
review
is
just
saying
whether
you
agree
with
those
changes,
so
we
have
a
little
more
weigh
in
and
maybe
what
you
just
said,
Mies
and
Michael
what
you
said
earlier,
maybe
you
can
add
that,
as
a
common
comment
to
rationalize
your
voting
and
I
will
talk
to
Tracy
and
make
sure
that
if
we
do
put
this
as
an
official
resource,
then
we
would
also
have
an
official
node
foundation.
Admin
account.
B
Okay
and
then
quick
question:
do
we
do
the
voting
for
new
TSE
members
in
the
public
part,
or
do
we
hold
off
for
the
private
part?
I
forgot
how
we
do
that.
B
B
B
B
H
Maybe
any
recurring
choice
or
suggestion
of
merging
her
arab
coatsy
are
into
v10
a
james.
Just
commented
that
hard
to
be
included
in
ten.
He
would
prefer
to
be
landed
by
tomorrow,
which
would
mean
fast
cracking
it.
It's
like.
I
mean
I'm
personally,
okay
with
that,
but
it's
just
like
might
be
a
good
reason
to
get
more
ice.
Looking
at
yeah.