►
Description
A
B
Right,
so
a
couple
of
us
have
been
talking
with
people
from
the
VA
team
or
firm
of
people
from
tv18,
since
the
field
about
like
the
aid
once
introduced,
pointer
compression
to
know
chess,
which
are
to
be
eight
and
have
us
use
that
potentially,
and
that
has
some
implications
for
notes.
Users
like,
for
example,
it
would
like
it.
B
Well
what
what
you
create
ups
are
that
come
with
this
feature
and
what
the
questions
are
that
we
need
to
answer
in.
You
know
chest
that
would
be
particularly
like
do
we
provide
two
different
modes
of
no
like
one
without
compression
and
what
defaulted
to
BP
and
how?
How
do
we
fight
to
divert
is
too
much
to
users
or
possibly
more
month
and
sorry
I,
just
I
wanted
everybody
to
be
aware,
like
I'm
gonna,
try
to
write
up
a
document
detailing
all
of
this
and
asking
for
input
from
the
TNC
and
from
the
public.
A
So
yeah
so
I
guess
that's
another
call
for
people
to
move
off
heads
up
that
it's
it's
actually
a
bit
shorter
than
our
regular
or
LTS
process
because
of
the
end
of
the
OpenSSL
end
of
life.
And
so,
if
you
haven't
already
been
made,
your
plans
to
move
off
of
eight
no
you're
definitely
recommended.
A
B
I'm
not
sure,
like
how
much
discussion
we
currently
need
to
have
here.
I
put
it
on
the
agenda
because
well
earlier,
feedback
was
kind
of
like
at
the
approach
was
not
the
preferable,
one
which
is
yeah
and,
like
I,
think
we've
made
some
progress
from
that
point.
I'd
enjoy
it.
You
want
to
say
something
about
this
like
currently
we're
actually
talking
with
about
actual
actionable
feedback
that
I
can
work
with
on
the
PR,
and
that
makes
things
a
lot
easier
than
when
I
added
this
to
the
agenda
thing.
E
D
D
Think
I
was
wanting
to
see
tests
or
use
cases
of
the
API
in
general,
right
like
if
there's
some
demos
or
in
the
phone,
either
in
the
form
of
tests
for
patches
in
the
upstream
or
in
the
downstream,
then
my
way
that
I'm
not
I'm,
not
having
issues
with
the
general
idea
of
facing
more
like
having
more
API
additions
to
environment
I.
Think
that
can
that
can
happen.
D
B
No
ignore
just
like
it
wasn't
issue
of
like
I
I.
Don't
want
a
right
test.
The
general
approach
wasn't
issue,
but
I
think
we're
fine,
just
working
the
rest
didn't
get
up
and
may
be
in
Montreal.
For
now,
you're
gonna
be
a
Montreal
break.
I'm!
Sorry,
are
you
gonna
be
in
Montreal
in
December
of
public
libraries,
no
I'll.
B
A
Okay,
so
then,
moving
on
to
the
next
issue,
strategic
strategic
initiative
to
move
see
make
for
building
to
no
js'.
We
did
discuss
this
last
week
and
so
I
don't
know.
If
there's
too
much
more
discussion,
I
did
have
another
discussion
with
Ben
and
he's
sort
of
continuing
on
I
think
he
still
has
an
action
to
add
a
sort
of
the
larger
plan.
A
In
terms
of
you
know
what
we
need
to
do
in
the
CI
and
so
forth
sounds
like
there's
some
tools
that
annex
I
you
know
somebody
external
has
been
using
to
convert
from
to
see
make.
So
those
may
actually
help
us
with
the
port
and
I
guess
like
I,
don't
know
if
we
have
the
same
people
here
as
last
time,
but
I
was
really
looking
to
see.
If
there's
like,
are
there
objections
to?
A
You
know
us
us
having
a
plan
to
try
and
move
to
see
make
first
from,
and
you
know
and
actually
making
it
a
you
know
a
strategic
initiative.
So
you
know
if
we
PR
that
into
the
strategic
initiative
list,
would
people
object
or
they
you
know
or
or
even
if
are
their
objections
to
us
working
in
that
direction,
because
it's
gonna
be
a
fair
amount
of
work
and
no
point
doing
it.
If
we
don't
think
it's
the
right
thing,
it.
C
A
A
A
Okay,
if
not,
then
let
the
next
the
next
one,
which
is
a
collaborator
summit,
number
416
I,
think
this
is
really
just
heroes
again,
so
that
we
don't
forget,
you
know
in
terms
of
club
summit
suggestions,
I,
think
that
you
know
we
still
would
like
some.
Although
I
the
agenda
may
be
filling
up,
so
if
you
do
have
one
and
the
sooner
the
better
from
that
perspective-
and
you
know
if
you
haven't
registered,
it's
going
to
be
a
great
time,
so
please
think
about
it.
A
A
Okay,
so
no
miles
and
API
team
is
working
hard
on
the
workshop
for
four
no
plus
GS
interactive.
So
if
you're
going
to
be
there,
consider
that
as
one
of
the
sessions
I
think
it
should
be
a
good
session
just
in
general
on
writing
add-ons
and
if
that's
something
interested
you're
interested
in
we're,
also
working
on
version
2
and
we're
trying
to
think
that
one
thing
that's
holding
that
up
is
there
are
some
issues
on
one
of
the
ax
machines
or
two
of
the
X
machines.
So
basically
that's
blocking
the
tool
release.
F
Repos
for
that
are
pending
and
move
into
them.
They're
just
org
I,
there's
something
like
administrative
work.
I
need
to
do
there,
I
guess:
I
haven't
gotten
around
to
it.
I'm
I've
not
really
done
along
as
anything
on
that
recently
I'm
supposed
to
have
a
time
block,
I
guess
to
talk
about
it
to
collaborate
or
summat,
but
I
still
need
to
finalize
my
actually
being
there
so
we'll
see
about
that.
F
D
E
G
Well,
what
chip
is
in
general,
so
a
monstrous
problem.
Yeah,
though
the
see
make
things,
makes
things
better,
because
then
jiff
will
be
used
only
by
no
chip
and
won't
be
used
anymore
by
thing
right.
So
that's
gets
things
better,
but
yeah
I,
don't
know,
I
mean
if,
if
we're
not
actually
pushing
forward
on
an
initiative,
I
don't
know
if
it's
helpful
to
report
on
its
lack
of
progress.
Well,.
A
It
was
more
like
I
think
on
the
Python
side,
the
Python
3
side.
You
said
there
were
issues
still
some
issues.
Still
some
you
know
thing
work
that
we
needed
to
do
so
it
was
worth
visibility.
If
that's
not
the
case
and
I'm.
Just
thinking
I'm
just
validating
that
you
know,
we
shouldn't
remove
it
from
the
list.
G
A
G
C
E
C
F
It's
quite
a
practical
to
not
to
have
someone
leading
a
strategic
initiative,
that's
not
on
the
TSC.
If
that's
really
the
case,
if
they're
leading
a
large
initiative
that
we
think
is
like
very
strategic
to
know
des
and
is
very
important,
then
we
should
probably
consider
nominating
that
person
to
be
on
the
TSC.
A
C
G
Christian
closes,
you
know
way
is
engage,
is
doing
a
lot
of
the
works,
but
yeah
I
can
I
can
be
its
own.
You
know,
I
understand
the
process.
Yeah
I
can
be
the
champion
and
I'm
still
working
with
Christian,
and
you
know
people
who
are
championing
some
effort
can't
just
be
added
to
the
TSC.
That's
I
mean
we
know,
that's
not
possible,
but.
A
A
Yep,
okay,
so
let's
yeah
think
about
that.
Moving
on
to
start
a
performance
Joey
anything
you
want
to
add
on
that
front.
D
The
people
who
use
the
shared
library
of
note
are
currently
having
issues
with
the
code,
cache
failure
and
the
stamp
shop
either
that
we
have
because
they
bill
with
lip
node
with
unresolved
symbols.
So
we
have
this
to
build
process
where
you
build
lip
numbers
with
only
resource
symbols,
and
then
you
use
that
way
stops
to
produce
the
code
cache
builder
and
a
snapshot
builder,
and
you
use
the
to
builder
to
spit
smells
files
and
use
that
again
with
lick
note
to
like,
like
produce
those
or
reduce
a
reserve
symbols.
D
So
these
to
build
process
cause
issues
for
em
for
people
who
use
the
lip
node,
because
in
their
use
cases
levena
will
be
the
final
product.
They
cannot
have
lick
node
with
unresolved
symbols,
so
I'm
currently
fixing
that
and
I'm
also
working
on
fixing
a
long-standing
to
do,
which
is
make
this
super
process
less
weird,
so
that
we
don't
we
don't
depend
on
the
same
thing
twice
or
we
don't
resolve
symbols.
We
we
should
always
have
some
label
that
have
resulted,
symbols
and
I
and
know
if
I
am
making
any
scissors
but
yeah.
D
B
Questions
about
this
because
I'm
right
now
thinking
about
it
so
like
one
question,
is
like:
is
there
something
that
explains
how
our
code
cache
words
you
just
like
for
the
quick
implementation,
a
div
test
tells
the
code
cache
this
and
I
really
can't
figure
out.
Why
and
the
quick
report,
if
you
feel
it
without
a
support,
yeah.
D
A
C
Yeah
I
mean
I,
think
you
know
it's
you've
brought
it
to
the
board
now
and
I
wonder
actually,
if
we
should
just
take
it
off
the
strategic
initiatives,
because,
basically
in
the
board's
hands
at
this
point-
and
we
can
put
it
back
on
if
they
you
know,
responds
what
that
said.
What's
going
on,
Michael
yeah.
A
I,
basically,
I
did
give
a
presentation
at
the
the
board
meeting
to
give
a
little
more
context
on
the
like.
What
is
the
build
working
group?
What
do
they
do?
Who
are
the
current
people
we
did
earlier
and
and
I
think
every
people
would
have
been
in
possibly
in
the
loop
you
know.
The
first
task
was
also
like.
What's
the
role,
so
we
provided
that
a
few
weeks
ago,
so
I
think
it's
now
back
into
the
board
members
side.
A
I,
do
you
know
in
the
last
one
I
think
the
next
step
was
actually
that
Robin
Jin,
the
executive
director
and
I
are
gonna
get
together
and
talk
about
some
options
and
stuff
like
that.
I
mean
I
think
that
the
challenge
is
still.
How
do
some
companies
motivate
or
find
people,
and
so
some
of
the
discussion
was
around
like?
Is
that
gonna
be
practical?
If
not
what
other
options
can
be
suggested?
A
A
D
C
I
mean
the
the
probably
the
most
effective
place
to
do.
It
is
in
the
weekly
TSC
issue
at
mention
all
the
people
who
are
champions
and
ask
them
to
please
provide
an
update
or
to
loop
in
the
part.
You
know
someone
else
who
is
doing
the
work.
Who
can
do
it
and
yeah
I
used
to
do
that
with
some
success.
But
some
success
is
better
than
no
success.
A
C
Think
it's
I
think
it's
a
poor
use
of
our
of
our
meeting
time
to
do
these
updates
in
the
meeting
I
think
we're
better
off
writing
them
down
and
we
can
read
them
in
the
weeks
we
have
meetings
but
like
why?
Why
would
we
not
have
updates?
Just
because
we
didn't
have
a
meeting?
Why
would
it
depend
on
who's
attending
the
meeting?
C
I
think
Joey's,
absolutely
right,
I
think
I
think
we
should
do
them
ahead
of
the
time
at
a
time
and
do
them
in
writing
and
and
I
like
the
idea
of
having
a
team
to
paying
for
these
things.
A
lot
of
them
have
built
in
teams
already,
like
you
know,
like
the
build
resources.
One
has
the
build
team,
you
don't
we
don't
even
create
a
new
team
for
it,
so
you
know,
and
for
the
ones
we
do
need
to
create
a
github
team
just
go
ahead
and
create
one.
D
G
C
A
That
sounds
like
a
good
way
to
do.
It
I
mean
I,
yep,
cuz,
yeah,
I
agree
if
it
was
already
in
like
actually
the
absolute
easiest
for
everybody
well,
for
me,
anyway,
would
be
if,
in
the
minutes
document
which
is
created
at
the
same
time,
people
just
wrote
it
into
the
minutes
onto
it
right
and
then
we
could
basically
use
it
to
highlight.
Are
there
any
things
we
need
to
discuss,
or
you
know,
question
to
resolve
that
kind
of
stuff.
D
A
I
will
paste
yep
when
you
just
find
that.