►
From YouTube: 2022-04-13-Node.js Technical Steering Committee meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Next
up
is
cpc
or
board
meeting
updates,
there's
no
board
meeting
updates
in
terms
of
cpc
updates.
I
guess
last
week
or
this
week.
Let
me
just
remember
this
week
there
was
a
meeting
trying
to
think
if
there's
anything
worth
reporting,
you
know
one
one
thing
of
interest
is
there
is
an
election
going
on?
So
if
you
have
any
thoughts
or
want
to
talk
to
rich
as
our
representative,
you
can,
you
can
comment
to
him
on
that.
A
So,
let's
move
on
to
the
issues
that
are
tagged
for
the
agenda,
so
the
first
one
is
number
four,
two,
five,
two
seven
that
was
actually
on
the
announcement
last
week
as
an
fyi
as
part
of
our
process.
We
probably
could
have
taken
the
tag
off,
but
the
issue
is
now
closed.
So
I
don't
think
there's
anything
to
discuss
on
that
front.
A
The
next
one
export
v8
trace
api.
I'm
just
trying
to
remember.
I
think
this
is
one
where
we're
waiting
for
james
to
be
at
the
meeting
to
discuss.
A
Let's
wait
till
the
half
hour
to
discuss
that.
I
guess
we
we
do
have
the
the
module,
ensure
no
node,
calling
only
modules
can
access
node
modules.
Let
me
I
think
that
one
is
the
one
for
the
vote
that
we
are
having.
There
are
some
discussions
in
there
in
terms
of
the
vote
being
close
and
so
the
I
think,
unless
I'm
thinking
of
the
wrong
one
yeah,
I
know
I
think
this
is
the
right
one
or
at
least
related.
A
We
are
doing
a
sort
of
a
revalidation
of
the
vote
and
the
ask
that
they
can
all
the
tsc
members
you
know
can
chime
in.
I
think
we're
getting
close
to
what
we
need
in
terms
of
the
governance.
I
don't
know
if
there's
anything
that
anybody
wants
to
add
on
on
that
front.
C
I
do
so,
I
think
the
vote
is
pretty
much
decided
based
on
the
reactions
on
the
the
issue,
but
we
still
need
to
merge
that
pull
request.
So
just
voting
is
not
enough.
We
actually
need
to
land
that
code
before
v18
goes
out
right.
A
So
but
that
should
be
able
to
happen.
I
guess
any
time
now,
once
once
we
once
we
I
haven't
looked
at
it,
I
think
rich
had
been
keeping
track
of
that,
but
we
seen
it
we
needed
one
or
two
more
people,
but
that
sounds
like
that
has
happened.
A
C
C
Four
two:
four:
three:
zero
yeah.
Let
me
just
find
and
put
the
link
in
there.
A
C
A
A
A
A
A
You
know
by
opening.
I
guess
in
that
case
we
would
open
call
for
nominations
and
nominations
later,
but
I
I
haven't
seen
too
much
discussion
in
there.
I
guess
the
people,
the
ask,
is
for
people
to
take
a
look
and
comment.
A
Okay,
if
not,
we
can
move
on
the
next.
One
was
the
daily
notable
summary
that
again
was
on
an
f
was
open
was
on
an
earlier
agenda.
We
did
have
some
discussion
to
see
if
people
were
had
any
fundamental
disagreements.
A
I
guess
we
have
had
some
discussion
in
the
issue
itself
and
you
know
maybe
I'll
just
take
it
off
the
agenda.
Unless
people
think
we
should
leave
it
on
the
agenda
for
some
reason,.
A
I
think
that
is
one
that
we
also
hope
to
have
james
for
so
maybe,
although
it's
looking
like
we're
getting
through
pretty
quickly,
but
we
might
we'll
defer
that
one
to
to
when
we
get
through
and
see
if
james
is
here
by
then
the
next
one
is
create
a
pat
for
block
list,
import,
export
number
672.
A
A
Okay,
so
if
not,
that
takes
us
to
the
end
of
our
agenda
items
module,
maybe
coming
back
to
a
couple
of
them
when
we
have
james.
Maybe
we
can
take
a
quick
look
at
the
strategic
initiatives
just
to
see
if
we've
got
any
updates
on
those
just
go
there.
A
So
I'm
just
looking
through,
I
don't
know
if
there's
an
update
on
core
promise
apis
on
pawn.
No,
not
this
way.
Okay,.
A
Looking
through,
I
don't
think,
I
think
the
the
the
only
other
one
is
next
ten.
So
just
we
did
has
a
heads
up.
We
did
have
a
good
mini
summit
last
week
where
we
dove
into
oh.
I
forget
quickly.
We
dove
into.
A
Both
web
assembly
and
security
models,
security
policies
discussion,
we
had
some
good
discussions.
I
think
we
sort
of
came
up
with
an
agreed
strategy,
slash
next
steps
for
each
of
those,
and
there
are
two
pr's
open
documenting
those
which
I'll
just
put
into
the
the
update
here.
A
And
that
takes
us
to
the
end
of
the
public
session
or
sorry
end
of
the
agenda.
I'm
suggest,
I
think.
Maybe
what
we
can
do
is
is
you
know,
end
our
public
session
go
into
the
the
private
section,
because
we
want
a
little
bit
of
time
for
that
and
james
said,
he'd
probably
make
it
in
ten
minutes,
but
we
can
then
pick
up
the
discussion
of
the
last
two
issues
with
him
when
he
gets
here.
Does
that
make
sense
to
everybody.