►
Description
A
Make
sure
live
now?
Okay,
all
right,
hello,
everybody!
This
is
the
node.js
tsc
technical
steering
committee
meeting
or
April
twentieth.
It
was
fairly
light
agenda.
We
don't
have
a
full
full
crew
on
for
today.
Just
yet
we've
been
having
some
audio
difficulties
getting
getting
going
here.
So
apologize
we
run
into
any
issues
while
we
are
underway.
A
A
On
our
agenda,
we
talked
about
the
upcoming
collaboration
summit
in
Berlin.
We
talked
about
the
input
on
employer
restrictions
for
the
tsc
director.
It's
also
on
the
agenda
for
today
to
get
an
update
on
where
we're
at
we
added
Anna
and
Michael
Dawson
to
the
tsc.
We
talked
about
update
on
the
copyright
date
and
updating
the
copyright
issues.
We
had
a
discussion
about
clarifying
which
people
should
be
org
owners.
I,
don't
think
that
issue
is.
A
We're
near
to
be
being
resolved
yet
today
our
agenda
is
fairly
light,
mostly
item
tomorrow.
Much
all
the
items
are
review
or
previous
previous
issues.
Don't
think
we
have
anything
new
on
the
public
agenda.
So,
let's
start
getting
through
it
on
the
board
request
input
on
employer
restrictions
of
TFC
director,
let's
just
get
a
status
of
beta
where
the
conversation
is
at
so
this
would
be
Michael
or
and/or
baud
and
give
us
an
update
on
what's
happening
here.
So.
B
Ok,
so
the
recap
is
that
there
is
this
relatively
strange,
forbid
room
the
bylaws.
It
says
that
the
tsc
director
can't
the
elected
tsc
director
can't
be
from
the
same
company
as
the
gold
or
silver
elected
director
and
the
way
that
it's
written
is
it
is
written
as
a
platinum
member
benefit.
So
it's
not
there
as
like
a
kind
of
check
on
interest,
it's
literally
written
as
a
member
benefit,
which
is
very
strange
to
say
the
least.
So
this
came
up
in
in
the
CSE
meeting.
B
The
earths
are
in
the
board
meeting
because
rod
and
the
gold
director
from
company,
so
one
of
them
we
need
to
step
down
who
looks
lean,
enforces
the
board
said
that
they
did
not
want
to
enforce
it
until
they
got
the
PSC's
input.
There
are
a
few
options
on
the
table.
1
is
just
removing
this
provision
from
the
bylaws.
If
that's
what
the
board
wants
to
do
that?
What
the
board
chair
would
like
to
do.
C
B
D
B
It's
not
it's
not
about
that.
It's
really
just
about
like
trying
to
provide
another
bottom
I
mean
yes,
remember
that
these
bylaws
are,
you
know,
from
a
template
of
a
template
of
a
template
started
many
many
years
ago,
and
it's
somewhat
telling
that
you
know
we.
We
didn't
even
recognize
this
until
this
was
a
concern
until
like
william
sounded
buried
somewhere
in
the
bylaws.
B
B
B
Think
what
they're
looking
for
liking
or
their
you're
going
to
look
for
a
resolution
to
this
issue
so
that
we
don't
have
a
director
not
in
good
standing
and
what
they
want
from
the
TSE
and
what
the
TSE
is
preferred
thing
going
forward
like
does
the
TSE
like
this
provision,
or
do
they
want
to
see
it?
God
is
the
way
that
I
would
put
it
so.
C
B
So
obviously,
we
just
got
a
new
executive
director
who's
out
there
kind
of
selling
and
then
kind
of
figuring
out
ways
to
so
I
had
a
short
discussion
with
him,
and
it
did
not
sound
like
this
was
something
that
was
going
to
really
hook
any
particular
numbers.
That
said,
you
know
until
we
kind
of
survey
the
existing
Platinum
members
that
are
there.
We
won't
really
understand
how
all
of
them
feel
about
it.
I
mean
Denise
Cooper's
from
a
platinum
member
and
she
wants
to
get
rid
of
it.
E
But
I
okay!
I
can
speak
up
to
that,
though,
because
there
are
other
platinum
members
who
have
expressed
even
in
discussion
that
that
they
like
that
provision.
So
it's
it's,
and
I
think
what
I
have
to
say
here
is
that
they're
representing
like
on
that
board
and
they're
representing
their
companies
right
and
the
reason
that
they
want
the
tsc
xinput
is
because
the
members
of
the
tsc
have
a
very
different.
E
C
B
To
Tracy's
point,
though,
like
they
are
like,
we
have
an
executive
director
that
is
looking
out
for
what
we
can
sell.
We
have
platinum
members
that
are
looking
out,
for
you
know
what
is
the
best
thing
for
them
apply
the
numbers.
What
they
need
from
the
TFC
is
what
is
best
for
the
TSE,
not
something
that
is
that
it's
sort
of
you
know
guard
it
against.
All
of
these
other
concerns
that
they're
already
looking
out
for.
F
So
I
want
to
add
it's.
This
benefit
to
platinum.
Members
is
also
quite
worthless
to
them
if
they
don't
actively
pursue.
Trying
to
put
someone
in
that
position,
so
yeah
like
having
it
there
is,
is
silly
if
you
know
as
a
benefit,
if
some
like,
if
Microsoft
wasn't
going
to
be
like
Josh
or
Brian,
we're
going
to
promote
you
being
that
person
and
like
I,
don't
think
that's
the
attitude
I've
of
your
witness
or
anyone
I'm
there
so
yeah
it
kind
of
deep
more
of
the
purpose.
A
So,
let's
say
for
the
sake
of
just
get
in
there,
it's
moving
along
sick
I,
just
a
quick
straw
poll
if
the
intent
is
to
get
the
TS&CS
input
on
whether
this
particular
provision
should
stay,
or
we
revise
how
many?
How
many
here
feel
that
it
should
be
kept
that
this
permit,
that
this
provision
should
be
retained
is
by
a
day
I.
H
I
say
I,
but
I
feel
like
I'm
in
a
awkward
spot
here
and
I've,
made
my
thoughts
fairly
clear
on
this
issue
already
on
github
I.
I
think
this
puts
the
TSE
in
an
awkward
position
at
particularly
the
kinds
of
people
who
would
be
candidates
for
this
position,
then
most
that
not
most
likely
that
they
are
more
likely
to
come
from
larger
companies
because
of
the
massive
time
investment
it
takes,
and
so
yeah.
C
Oh,
am
I
right,
I
want
I
I
want
to
ask
it
like
I,
really,
don't
I
mean
my
only
opinion
is
kind
of
from
Microsoft
opinion
and
I'm
such
a
strong
personal
opinion,
but
I'm
trying
to
understand
what
the
benefit
is
to
the
tsc
one
way
or
the
other
like.
What
are
the
advantages
to
us
or
not
whether
like
from
the
TSE
street,
like
discounting
the
whole
Platinum
Member
consideration
he's
even
getting
at,
we
want
to
be
able
to
like.
I
K
H
Only
if
the
tsc
had
a
problem
with
with
two
people
from
the
same
company,
then
yeah
I
mean
it's
a
tough
thing
and
and
III
I
have
sympathy
for
the
Platinum
members
here
because,
to
be
honest,
Platinum
membership
doesn't
provide
quite
enough
benefits
to
justify
the
massive
amount
of
money
they
have
to
pay.
But
that's
not
the
TRC's
problem
as
far
as
I'm
concerned.
H
That's
the
board's
problem
to
figure
out
if
they
that
they
need
to
make
sure
they
need
to
find
ways
to
make
that
either
that
amount
of
money
more
worthwhile
or
make
it
not
that
expensive.
To
that
to
mean
that
it's
that
dramatic
and
and
not
push,
no
not
use
this
as
another
lever
to
make
it
more
beneficial.
I
mean
okay.
To
be
honest,
I
find
it
kind
of
gross
that
that
the
the
idea
that
platinum
membership
gives
you
a
perk
above
others
where
you
potentially
could
get
two
votes
of
it.
H
B
Think
of
one
tester,
the
one
test
of
this
would
have
been
like
you
know
if
it
were
a
platinum
member,
venoth
member
incentive,
and
it
were
also
good
for
the
TSE.
What
would
happen
is
that
if
somebody
from
a
gold
or
silver
seat
got
elected
to
the
tsc
and
it's
forced
their
company
to
upgrade,
that's
not
happening
like
like
we
already
kind
of
tested
that
in
theory
and
like
rod,
would
just
end
up
stripping
down
and
I.
B
Can't
imagine
you
know
near
form
would
cough
up
an
extra
150
thousand
dollars
of
one
of
their
people
were
elected
to
it
from
like
the
silver
side,
and
so
like
I.
Just
don't
like
the
the
test
cases
that
we
have
so
far
for
this
being
something
that
could
potentially
push
somebody
in
upgrading
have
not
panned
out,
and
they
would
they
would
essentially
just
you
know,
end
in
the
tsc
having
a
lack
of
representation
like
people
that
could
represent
them,
depending
on
what
happened
with
gold
until
per
election.
Basically
and.
H
That's
that
we've
got
to
discuss
as
well,
but
I'll
be
I'll,
be
sit
down,
and
this
this
will
be
resolved
soon
in
this
current
instance.
So,
let's
think
about
this
for
the
next
time.
This
comes
up,
because,
if
it's
not
resolved
now
it's
going
to
come
up
again
and
it'll
involve
one
of
you
or
somebody
probably
who's
on
the
wings,
and
it
needs
to
be
resolved
in
some
form
and
I.
H
Don't
want
to
see
the
next
person
in
this
in
this
position
of
having
to
have
is
awkward
thing
happening
and
I
certainly
don't
want
to
see.
This
happened
to
a
one
of
the
mid-tier
companies
that
is
servicing
the
node
ecosystem,
because
they're
they're
not
as
likely
to
be
a
platinum
member,
so
you
think
about
the
no
sauce
near
form
yield
these
companies
that
are
that
are
dedicated
to
serving
the
node
ecosystem,
as
opposed
to
the
pattern.
H
Companies
which
are
not
I
mean
these
are
these
are
companies
that
are
big
enough
to
have
platinum
membership,
but
they
also
have
their
fingers
in
many
pies
they're,
not
dedicated
to
serving
the
netiquette
system
they
dedicated
to
serving
a
bunch
of
ecosystem.
So,
while
it's
great
that
we
have
them
in
my
heart,
personally
is
much
more
with
these
smaller
companies
that
are
dedicated
to
node
and
it.
So
if
it
happens
to
them
again,
what
do
we
think
about
that?
H
A
Want
to
end
up
in
a
situation
where
we
we
elect
somebody
to
the
tsc
on
this
next
cycle,
QC
director
position,
and
then
there
is
some
kind
of
change
of
employment
or
change
status
bit.
It
has
absolutely
nothing
to
do
with
the
tsc.
It
ends
up
putting
us
in
the
same
kind
of
awkward
position,
and
it
just
needs
to
be
where
the
tsc
director
serves
independently
of
that,
based
on
what
the
tsc
feels
it
is
in
its
best
interest.
C
Summarize
that
I
wrote
it
in
the
butt
I
just
want
to
say
it
out
loud
that
what
I'm
hearing
for
everyone-
and
I
think
I'm
a
creeper-
is
that
the
tsc
needs
to
have
flexibility
to
do
what's
best
for
node
technically,
and
we
shouldn't
be
am
strong
by
rules
about
the
board.
If,
if
what's
best
for
node
technically
is
someone
from
node
source
or
near
form
or
whatever?
It
is,
then
that's
what
it
should
be.
That
should
be
the
priority.
Yeah.
B
So,
just
just
to
kind
of
put
this
to
bed,
it
sounds
like
the
consensus
is
that
everybody
agrees
is
the
best
thing
from
the
tsc
is
for
this
rule
not
to
be
there.
I
do
think
that
there
are
I.
Think
it's
fair
to
say
there
are
members
of
the
tsc
that
understand
that
if
this
is
a
huge
benefit
for
selling
platinum
membership
said
you
know,
they're
they're
open
to
it,
but
their
preference
is
not
that
and
I
think
that
we
can
represent
that
to
the
board.
B
J
G
Yep,
that's
my
views
exactly
as
well,
and
the
other
thing
I
think
you
know
dad
is
like
you
know.
This
is
what
we're
going
to
present
and
you
know
if
other
people
switch
to
the
new
executive
director
thinks
that
that
upsell
is
important.
Then
it's
kind
of
their
responsibility
to
sort
of,
I
think,
communicate
that
to
us.
You
know
that
shouldn't
be
for
us
to
discern
like
what's
best
for
selling
membership,
because
you
know
that's
not
our
area
of
expertise,
yeah.
A
Point:
okay:
okay,
oh
oh
I!
Keep
it
here,
I
want
to
give
you
the
agenda
moving
on
here,
30
almost
half
past,
so
okay.
So
we
can
continue
this
if
necessary,
but
I
think
blogging
Michael.
You
should
have
enough
at
this
point
to
to
be
able
to
take
out
it
that
the
pain
back
to
the
board
and
and
we'll
we'll
leave
this
on
the
agenda.
So
we
can
update
on
the
next
call
where
things
are
working.
Direct
next
issue
is
tsc
195.
The
copyright
date
issue,
I'm
going
to
assume
there's
been
no
progress
on
this.
B
A
B
I
need
to
count
the
votes,
but
that
vote
and
at
like
the
end
of
today,
technically
so
I
should
get
something
back,
but
the
vote
the
most
are
coming
in
all
yay.
It
looks
like
oh
yeah,
I
mean
they've
all
come
in.
Yay
I
just
need
to
count
them
up
and
make
sure
the
new
acorn,
but
nobody
nobody
objective.
It
looks
like
it's
passing
the.
A
Okay,
clarify
which
people
should
be
org
owners,
toc
125,
is
kind
of
long
standing
issue
and
there's
been
a
number
of
different
opinions
and
takes
on
this
I
know.
William
was
working
on
a
blot
that
could
take
over
some
of
the
administrative
tasks,
but
I
know
myself
and
Ben
Lisa.
Two
of
us
had
some
issues
on.
You
know
what
kind
of
security
permissions
that
thing
would
would
need
to
have
and
what
risk
side
opens
up
to.
B
Even
well,
that's
not
the
question,
but
the
question
is
like:
could
we
move
it
if
it
made
this
problem?
A
lot
easier
to
do
is
write
like
if,
if
we
moved
it,
you
know,
is
that
an
option
for
them?
Would
it
break
things?
Would
it
make
things
horribly
a
delay
like
what
they
objects
to
us,
moving
that
in
order
to
make
the
the
in
order
to
open
up
or
wide
owners
a
little
bit
more
without
also
but.
J
I
think
this
part
was:
he
wasn't
worried
about
that,
because
you
know
the
secrets
already
encrypted
through
a
set
of
gpg,
keys
I
think
his
position
was
fine
right,
like
all
the
keys
in
there.
You
know
each
of
us
have
added
gpg
keys
and
so,
like
you
know,
I
can
access
the
test
one,
but
I
can't
access
the
other
one.
So
people
who
don't
have
any
keys
wouldn't
be
able
to
access
anything.
B
A
I
A
Other
the
other
set
is
where
am
I,
and
no,
we
know
I
to
go
to
push
back
a
little
bit
on
the
bot.
Work
that
you
were
doing.
I
would
be
very
interested
in
seeing
some
more
information
on
that
work
to
see
exactly
what
what
the
permission
requirements
for
the
bot
would
be
and
how
those
you
know
how
that
bot
would
be
secured.
So
we
know
what
the
what
the
risks
are
for
actually
automating.
Some
of
those
processes,
hi.
B
So
we
can,
we
focus
on
how
to
secure
the
bot
rather
than
limiting
its
permissions,
because
I
think
at
the
end
of
the
day,
what
we
want
the
bot
to
be
able
to
do
are
the
things
that
we
don't
want
to
give
a
ton
of
people
direct
access.
So
I
think
I
think,
by
definition,
what
we
want
the
bot
to
do
is
to
take
on
a
fair
amount
of
permissions.
It's
really
just
a
matter
of
like
how
do
we
lock
down
that
bot
and
keep
the
box
appear
so.
F
So
the
permissions
are
documented
in
that
thread
and
there's
not
there's
only
like
one
checkbox
that
it
needs
and
that's
to
be
able
to
manage
the
members
of
the
org,
which
I
believe
also
was
the
one
that
was
needed
for
blocking
users,
and
that
was
at
all
other
work
like
commenting
on
issues
and
things
like
that.
That's
just
not
what
this
spot
would
be
doing
that,
but
the
other
BOTS
is
already
doing
so.
F
This
one
had
a
very
focused,
very
narrow
path
and
so
that
it
could
be
isolated
and
build
working
group
would,
you
know,
take
it
in
inside
their
their
realm
and
lock
it
down,
and
it
would
only
the
things
like
two
actions
that
it's
made
to
do
now
with
that
that
there
was
some
more
discussion
about
what?
What
kind
of
things
can
you
have?
As
you
know,
the
org-
and
you
know,
there's
that
lifts
that
I
posted
there
from
github
that
show
you,
but
what
I
miss
is
I,
guess
and
I.
F
J
F
That
would
then
be
taken
away
like
if
we
remove
virtually
all
org
owners.
So
let's
say
then
Ben
wouldn't
be
able
to
go
little
guy
I
know
what
happened
for
instance.
So
we
would
have
to
you
know
it's
this
checklist
of
like
what
what
things
are
we
using?
That
would
need
to
be
replaced
with
another
mechanism
and
that
audit
log
is
something
that
would
be
nice.
Oh,
my
consider
it
in
the
box,
but
of
course
we
can
discuss
any
of
these
things
in
the
checklist
will
be
needed.
F
B
We
can
we
kick
off
a
specific
thread
about
the
audit
log
and
what
to
do
about
that.
Just
just
to
kind
of
isolate
that
discussion,
because
I
think
that
if
we
look
at
it
enough,
maybe
something
that
we
want
to
open
up
and
make
more
transparent
generally.
So
that
could
just
be
a
good
thread
kind
of
on
its
own.
A
F
B
A
It
once
a
week,
so,
okay,
all
right,
so
that
we
can.
We
can
continue
that
discussion
on
the
ingot
ever
just
one,
definitely
make
sure
that
we
receive
more
progress
there.
So
don't
try
to
jump
in
and
help
with
that
as
well.
Moving
on
to
the
last
official
item
on
our
public
agenda,
while
we're
going
through
this,
if
you
know
Jeremiah,
don't
okay,
if
you
can
go
ahead
and
post
some
on
Twitter
or
the
YouTube
ports
listening,
questions
might
be
a
good
good
time
to
start
asking
for
that.
A
Community
community
committee
issue
number
seven
code
of
conduct
for
everything.
Just
a
quick
update
on
this
I.
Don't
forget
anything
for
us
to
decide,
but
what
we
discussed
previously
was
moving
the
code
of
conduct
to
the
tsc
repo
I
have
done
that
we
had
the
PRS
got
all
the
approvals.
I
think
I
landed
that
you
think
they're
really
gonna
take
her
or
late
last
week.
A
So
the
code
of
conduct
text
itself
now
exists
in
the
no
jst
SC
repository
now
that
code
of
conduct
for
everything
issue
on
the
community
committee
also
had
a
number
of
other
suggestions
such
as
am
picking
up
that
code
of
conduct.
So
it's
easier
to
reuse,
so
I
think
of
some
remaining
to
do
is
there,
but
as
far
as
the
TS,
these
actions
of
moving
that
out
of
the
core,
Rico
I,
think
we're
done
at
this
point,
and
this
issue
probably
taken
off
our
agenda.
F
D
G
E
E
G
F
A
B
A
A
A
C
A
C
H
I
know
this
is
this
is
awkward
because
we're
asking
to
do
being
put
on
the
spot
like
James
said,
but
if
anyone
does
want
to
criticize
this,
like
feel
free
to
contact
me
and
critique
I'm
more
than
happy
to
receive
that
and
I've
done
this,
it's
primarily
for
experience.
I
didn't
think
that
I
election
just
for
delegation
was
necessarily
the
best
way
to
go.
This
is
more
about
making
sure
the
work
gets
done
efficiently
and
effectively.
A
A
Part,
I
don't
have
the
issue
immediately,
handy
so
Michael
you
can
repost
it
into
the
chat
for
everybody.
So
our
last
year,
when
we
did
the
tsc
director
election,
we
ended
up
doing
it
in
August,
but
we
ended
up
doing
it
late
for
the
actual
schedule,
it's
kind
of
an
afterthought
alone,
a
psycho
crap.
We
need
to.
We
need
to
do
this,
so
if
we
followed
the
year
cycle,
then
the
next
election
for
the
TFC
director
and
chair
would
come
up
in
August,
but
Michael
open
this
thread
to
see.
B
A
B
B
Generally,
you
know
from
january,
through
november,
just
gets
it
heats
up
like
there's
more
and
more
and
more
kind
of
coming
into
the
agenda
as
the
year
goes
along
things
kind
of
culminate
with,
like
you
know,
a
big
conference
in
the
fall
and
then
also
all
of
the
budget
for
the
next
year
ends
up
getting
approved
in
november
december
is
essentially
of
taken
off.
In
january,
a
new
individual
director
comes
on
in
june.
B
New
gold
and
silver
rep
directors
had
to
come
on.
So
this
kind
of
gives
you
an
idea
of
like
when
the
sweet
spot
might
be
for
you
to
put
it
in
something
new,
get
them
up
to
speed
on
kind
of
what's
going
on,
so
they
can
actually
affect
decisions
coming
into
the
budget
towards
the
end
of
the
year
coming
into
the
conference,
and
you
know
no
enough
have
enough
contacts
on
the
board
to
participate
in
the
board
chair
and
board
vice
chair
election
as
well,
which
happens
in
July
and
and.
B
B
H
Saw
I'll
say
that
that
normally
I
would
I
would
become
reaching
out
to
the
tsc
privately
anyway
for
for
input
on
those
big
voting.
Things
like
the
the
the
election
of
the
chair
and
stuff
and
I
would
hope
that
whoever
comes
next
would
do
the
same
thing
but
as
as
we've
discussed
previously,
and
it's
come
up,
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
would
be
including
that
in
the
depends
on
this,
but
it's
as
board
members.
B
Also
I'll,
just
like
I'll
try
to
clarify
what
Rob
said
about
representing
yourself
and
representing
a
consistency.
So
like
the
you,
when
you
represent
a
class,
you
are
fiduciary
bound
to
represent
that
class,
but
also
like
to
the
best
of
your
ability
to
what
you
believe
so
like
you
at
the
end
of
the
day,
are
responsible
for
that.
B
Like
you
have
to
you
know,
it's
even
like
engaged
in
private
conversations,
without
necessarily
talking
to
that
entire
constituency
and-
and
you
are
supposed
to
represent
that
consistency,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day
like
you
can't
go
and
survey
them
for
every
result
and
in
fact
sometimes
you
you
are
not
allowed
to,
because
you
have
to
keep
certain
information
private
when
it
relates
to
like
there's
all
kinds
of
kind
of
private,
disclose
or
stuff
that
we
can't
do
well,
we
can't
release
until
later
on.
Do
you
have
to
participate
in
so
you're?
You
yeah.
A
A
D
A
Have
the
election
no
I
mean
increased
every
two
weeks,
Phillip
that
you
know
we
need
to
be
able
to
have
an
idea
of
who
the
candidates
are
at
least
go
through.
Maybe
one
of
talk
through
talk
through
that
and
then
have
the
vote
the
following
meeting,
so
we
need
to
make
a
rarely
quick
decision.
If
this
is
just
one.
Alternatively,
we
could
choose
their
favorite
of
the
election
in
June
July.
We
just
need
to
be
deliberate
about
that
choice
and.
H
H
B
Mean
I
would
say
that,
like
you
know,
whenever
a
new
board
member
comes
on,
we
have
to
do
some
onboarding
and
that
that
takes
work
and
the
getting
a
bunch
at
the
same
time
would
not.
That
would
increase
the
amount
of
work
and
be
like
a
little
bit
more
difficult
like
I,
just
just
from
like
an
institutional
perspective
like
it
would
be
easier
on
the
foundation
staff.
B
If
we
were
on
boarding,
if
we
had
like
a
month
to
on
board
the
TSU
director
before
we
had
two
on
board
new
gold
and
silver
directors,
we've
gotten
out
of
this
a
lot
lately,
just
because
we
had
some.
Some
of
the
people
that
got
into
those
elections
were
already
really
well
established
or
got
voted
in
twice
like
Brian
did.
So
it's
been
a
little
bit
easier,
but
you
could
easily
see
a
situation
in
which
we
have
like
four
people,
two
on
board
at
the
same
time,
and
that
would
be.
B
A
A
The
we
have
we
have
the
issue
in
the
big
hub
repo.
Let's
not
decide,
try
to
decide
this
today,
but
let's,
let's
commit
to
making
a
decision
at
the
next.
To
you
see,
maybe
neither
note
on
that
that
tsc
meetings
happen
will
happen
during
the
collaborators
summit.
So
let
me
just
kind
of
figure
out
the
scheduling
on
that
is
it.
It
conflicts
with
the
collaborators
and
it's
going
to
be
in
Berlin
and
I.
B
I
think
that
we've
got
we've
got
an
issue
there
that
not
a
lot
of
people
participated
in.
Could
we
maybe
bring
it
to
a
vote
for
preference
by
month
and
just
kind
of
list
out
the
Munson,
and
do
it
that
way
that
we
can
do
that?
We
should
move
it.
Yeah
I
mean
then
we'd
reached
a
decision,
most
definitely
buy
that
meeting,
and
then
we
would
have
at
least
a
week
or
two
to
to
do
an
election
and
have
all
the
nominees
congruent
figure
it
out
by
by
that
board
meeting
in
the.
I
I
C
A
Well,
that's
the
man:
let's
go
ahead
and
and
close
the
public.
You
have
a
couple
of
for
least
one
private
issue
to
discuss,
we'll,
go
ahead
and
close
out
the
public
and
thanks
everyone
for
joining,
and
our
next
call
is
going
to
be
into
each
other,
we're
going
to
figure
out
the
logistics
for
that
because
of
the
collaborator
summit.
So
thank
you.
Everyone.