►
Description
A
B
A
A
Guess
the
one
I,
as
you
probably
noticed
that
the
meeting
times
will
have
shifted
due
to
the
time
changes.
I,
don't
know
if
that
means
we
should
re-evaluate
the
times
in
terms
of
whether
they
work
for
people
or
not,
but
you
know
basically
think
about
that
and
if
we
think
we
need
to
do
something,
you
know
raise
an
issue
and
we
can
have
a
have
a
discussion
to
look
at
that.
A
The
other
thing
I
noticed
the
code
of
conduct.
Pr
is
at
there's
a
PR
to
move
to
stage
three
which
would
be
adoption
so
that
may
move
forward
as
soon,
although
there's
some
comments
and
input,
which
is
great
from
some
of
the
new
projects.
So
there
is
some
discussion
going
on
in
that
front,
and
those
were
the
things
I
could
think
of.
It
sounds
like
Matteo's.
N'
is
on
a
noisy
train,
so
I
can't
jump
into
further
update.
B
A
Yeah
for
them
in
for
the
existing
projects
in
the
CPC
repo
there's
been
an
issue
opened
for
each
of
the
projects
and
we
have
a
checklist,
which
is
the
checklist
that
we
use
for
new
projects,
and
the
thought
is,
is
that
you
know
well,
we
should,
if
that's
something
we
think
is
reasonable
for
new
projects.
It
should
be
reasonable
for
all
the
existing
projects,
and
so
it's
a
matter
of
going
through
that
you
know
the
in
our
case
are
voting.
Cpc
members
are
the
ones
who
have
sort
of
the
point
on.
A
B
A
D
Yeah
I
don't
need
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
have
bring
up
a
lot
of
context
here,
but
the
issue
has
been
we're
a
little
short
on
OS
X
resources
where
we're
we're
trying
to
get
up
X
we're
trying
to
get
get
Catalina
into
our
build
farm.
We're
trying
to
get
Xcode
10
installed
onto
some
over
4
machines,
we're
trying
to
get
to
perform
snack
minis.
Well,
the
OS
right,
the
open,
GS
foundations
back
Mini
is
located
at
near
forum
running
and
then
and
now
there's
this
new
issue.
D
So
unless
so,
there's
a
volunteer
somewhere
it
steps
up
to
automating
this
process,
or
you
know
doing
some
work
to
get
our
release
process
to
notarize
executables.
It
looks
like
things
could
go
poorly
for
Mac
users
in
2020,
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up
TSE
levels.
So
nobody
has
that
moment
of
like
oh,
my
god.
Why
didn't
anybody
mention
this.
A
Right
so,
as
I
ended
up
understand,
if
nobody
stand,
you
know
basically
steps
up
steps.
Ups
to
help
at
this
point
today,
OS
X
users
have
to
do
like
a
quick
click
through
or
something
like
that
on
on
Catalina
to
be
able
to
install
the
the
no
GS
binaries,
and
we
believe
that,
potentially
in
January,
they
just
won't
be
able
to
install
them
at
all.
A
A
A
This
is
going
to
apply
to
all
binaries,
so
it's
not
just
like
you
know.
We
come
up
with
a
new
release
and
those
new
releases.
It's
like
the
existing
releases,
8,
10
and
12.
So
all
the
LTS
releases
will
suffer
the
same
problem
and
one
of
the
considerations
was
around
whether
well,
you
know
it.
There's
there's
definitely
risk
to
changing
the
build
pipelines
for
older
releases.
A
So
one
could
one
question
was
you
know?
Is
it
okay
that
will
only
try
and
resolve
this
issue
for
the
latest
LTS
release?
So
if
you're
on
Catalina-
and
you
want
to
install
from
those
pre-built
binaries,
your
only
option
may
actually
be
the
latest
latest
versus
any
of
the
other
ones
and
I
wonder
if
anybody
has
any
thoughts
or
you
know,
concerns
with
that
kind
of
pattern.
A
E
A
Guess
just
to
make
it
clear
to
everybody
who's
here
and
anybody's
listening.
You
know,
Sam
put
it
on
the
agenda
because
current
course
and
speed
there
is
nobody
who's
going
to
fix
it,
and
so
it's
a
it's
a
problem
in
January
we
it
you
know
we
may
the
the
peak
AG's
will
no
longer
be
usable
if,
unless
we
find
a
volunteer-
and
we
don't
have
any
prospects
at
this
point.
A
E
A
I
think,
in
terms
of
you
know,
I
can
fill
in
some
of
the
contacts
and
that
there
is
an
issue
which
is
open.
That's
been
discussing
this.
There
was
discussion
of
moving
the
code,
learn
up
to
say
the
open
J's
level
in
there
there
was,
you
know
quite
a
bit
of
feedback
from
the
previous
organizers
that
you
know
we've
kind
of
run
out
of
tasks
to
some
extent.
It's
also
a
lot
of
work,
and-
and
you
know
we
just
weren't
ready
to
do
it
this
this
time.
A
It
seems,
though,
that
it
doing
it
at
the
open,
J's
level.
There
hasn't
been
enough
interest
and
there
you
know
the
question
back
from
the
organizers
is:
should
we
just
return
the
time
back
to
the
overall
collaborator
summit?
I,
don't
see
that
there's
anybody
in
the
issues
who
has
volunteered
to
run
run
it
you
know,
and
we
don't
have
a
volunteer
so
I
guess
the
thing
is
like
either
what
I
think
we
should
say
that
it's
not
gonna,
it's
not
gonna
happen
or
somebody.
C
I'm
good
with
that,
so
couple
of
problems
I
want
to
talk
about
when
we
are
running
the
cordon
Lyon
has
a
short
notice.
If
you
look
at
the
repo,
you
can
see
some
of
the
Coronel
own
activities
raised,
PRS,
which
is
still
lingering
around
not
properly
closed,
so
I
believe.
The
the
problem
with
the
current
approach
is
the
originator
of
originators
of
the
topics.
If
they
are
not
volunteering
to
none
the
current
learn,
what
could
happen
is
whoever
is
volunteer.
C
Volunteering
for
running
this
man
would
be
well-versed
with
the
topics
and
more
and
more
peers
could
get
orphan
or
unattended
in
a
proper
way.
So
I
would
say
we
look
at
those
topics
in
a
more
comprehensive
manner
and
pharaonic
at
a
later
point
in
time,
maybe
for
for
the
next
year,
pull
up
some
it
or
something
so
I'm
good
for
giving
back
the
time
for
collapse
on
it.
A
A
A
A
Okay
and
then
the
next
issue
is
the
collaborator
summits
and
again
I
believe
that
this
is
on
the
the
agenda
from
Matteo,
and
it's
there
for
awareness
to
remind
people
that
were
having
a
collaborator
summit
in
Montreal,
along
with
the
node
plus
G,
is
interactive
and
that
you
know
it's.
The
call
for
opening
submitting
submissions
and
I
mean
sessions
is
open
and
please
submit
as
soon
as
you
can,
so
that
that
helps
the
organizers
anything
to
be
added
to
that.