►
Description
A
Okay,
we
are
line
hello.
Everyone
welcome
to
the
new
Jesus
foundation,
technical
steering
committee
meeting
or
the
bogies,
which
way
is
that
Dayton,
okay,
the
15th
of
November
2017
I,
am
Jeremiah.
I
am
sharing
instead
of
Michael
today,
again,
alright,
so
let's
get
into
this.
Does
anyone
have
any
announcements
to
make.
B
D
You
know
I
would
probably
the
only
thing
I
would
say
is
that
in
about
a
month,
I'm
gonna
be
kicking
off
the
preparations
for
no
ten
getting
me
to
eat
the
tracking
issue.
Anybody
that
has
anything
that
definitely
wants,
but
they
definitely
want
to
be
in
know.
Ten
needs
to
start
adding
it
to
the
mosque,
though
we
cracked.
A
A
F
B
This
may
actually
be
a
nice
segue
into
the
thing.
I
asked
me
to
add
to
the
agenda
from
383
Ono
and
not
383
371
around
the
iaa
stuff
for
mime
types,
to
be
honest
with
the
explicit
MJS
stuff
like
so
you
know,
we've
been
having
some
conversations
about
modules
and
we're
in
the
process
of
trying
to
figure
out
where
we're
standing
on
things,
I,
don't
believe
that
we
yet
have
reached
a
consensus
on
interoperability
and
I.
B
Mjs
is
the
way
to
do
that.
There's
ways
to
do
that
in
the
browser
through
you
know,
type
module,
but
we,
you
know,
don't
have
that
in
node.
So
I
think
that,
no
matter
what
we're
gonna
have
a
need
for
supporting
nsj
and
we
should
move
forward
to
get
those
mime
types
made
official,
whether
or
not
or
how
MJS
MJS
interact
as
a
default
in
import
I
think
are
going
to
completely
be
determined
on.
Our
Interop
story
is
something
that
I
think
we
should
be
working
on
so.
F
I,
don't
think
we're
gonna
know
what
this
issue
like,
what
the
specific
decision
or
issue
is
without
asking
or
doing
a
lot
of
reading
through
the
thread,
but
even
then
it
might
not
be
clear
so
and
I
know
that
you're
planning
on
I
think
miles
you're
planning
on
another
modules
meeting
anyway,
I'm
wondering
if
I
or
you
or
James
or
someone
I
guess
I
can
take
it.
We'll
just
take
an
action
item
to
ask
web
reflection
for
a
concise
description
of
you
know.
F
A
B
B
A
A
Okay,
I
think
we
can
move
on
to
new
GS
/t
s.
These
issues,
then
so
399
talk
initial
version
of
strategic
initiatives,
I
think
this
was
Michael,
Dawson's
and
I.
Don't
think
he's
done
anything
with
it
since
last
week,
I
think
he
said
if
we
can
merge
it
but
hasn't
gotten
to
it.
A
F
A
All
right,
well,
I,
think
we
can
got
off
the
agenda
at
least
doesn't
seem
like
the
nice
painting
thing
discussed
here,
particularly
on
it
also
for
the
next
one,
which
would
have
been
three
three
proposal
to
form
a
governance
working
group
that
hasn't
been
a
action
and
James
has
asked
us
to
from
the
agenda.
Because
of
that,
unless
anyone
has
comments
about
it,.
B
I
think
I
mean
it
take
over
trying
to
plan
that
I
think
I
will
send
out
a
new
gist
I'm
gonna,
be
in
Asia
for
the
next
two
weeks.
So
it's
gonna
make
things
a
little
bit
difficult
timing,
wise
for
myself.
I
know
that
Matteo,
who
also
wanted
to
be
around
involved,
is
out
of
town
until
was
it
December
18th,
Matteo
and.
G
More
or
less
yes,
I
on
and
off
from
the
beginning
of
December
and
coming
back
on
the
system,
but
then
I'm
drowning
again
the
week
afterwards,
so
it
I
can
try
to
schedule
something
if
it.
If
it's
referred
to
urgent
I
can
make
myself
available
on
the
I
think,
seven
or
eight
or
something
like
that
of
December.
But
otherwise
is
like
yeah.
It's
a
tea.
B
B
B
So
maybe
what
we
can
do
to
start
since
timing
has
has
been
you
know,
an
issue
and
committing
to
like
organizing
has
been
an
issue
is
maybe
we
can
actually
just
start
a
repo
to
just
keep
track
of
the
small
iterations
and
progress
that
we
want
to
do,
and
maybe
we
can
do
it
asynchronously
and
have
it
a
little
bit
more
open.
We
already
have
a
repo.
What
repo
is
it?
The
TSC
repo
games.
B
So
the
only
reason
I
was
suggesting
another
repo
is
just
to
scope
it
and
limit
noise
because
there's
a
lot
of
other
stuff
that's
coming
in.
But
how
do
we
just
take
it
back
to
that
issue
and
discuss
it
offline
and
try
to
see
what
what
or
how
we
can
maybe
try
to
move
this
forward
without
requiring
it
to
be
so
official?
Maybe.
A
A
B
There's
a
one
more
thing
that
I
asked
to
have
added,
which
was
number
371,
which
was
registering
note,
specific
mime
types,
so
Brad
MEC
would
like
to
register
a
few
new
mime
types
for
the
note
foundation
under
the
ia
and
a
registry,
so
he
had
sent
him
the
application
and
the
request
got
pushed
back
because
they
wanted
to
move
it
to
standards
track.
Instead
of,
let
me
find
the
exact
language,
and
specifically,
we
need
to
discuss
the
IAE
and
AI
ESG,
asking
us
to
change
from
a
vendor
to
standards
track
for
any
registration.
B
This
is
resulted
in
a
request
to
specify
verify
a
standards
organization
to
use
as
a
contact.
Currently
we
have
the
technical
steering
committee
for
that,
but
Brad
was
interested
in
maybe
having
a
be
the
foundation
itself.
So
I
was
requested
to
bring
this
to
us
to
see.
If
we
want
to
ask
the
board,
if
that's
something
the
foundation
should
handle
hey
James,
you
seem
to
know
more
about
this
yeah.
B
D
So,
usually
things
that
our
vendor
track
are
tied
to
specific
companies,
and
that
may
be
what
they're
pushing
back
on
since
this
is
coming
from
an
open
source
project.
If
we
have
the
foundation
sponsor,
it's
then
pushing
it
as
a
vendor
track.
It
makes
more
sentences
since
the
foundation
is
incorporated
either
way
they're.
D
D
D
A
D
It
comes
down
I,
just
posted
a
link
to
the
relevant
RFC
media
type
registrations,
so
vendor
tree
specifically
used
or
commercially
available
products,
and
what
it's
sounding
like
is
they're,
not
viewing
node
as
a
commercially
for
the
commercial
product,
they're
doing
more
open
sourcing,
spanish,
fries
and
tentacle
types
of
gentlemen
just
to
the
internet
community,
which
is
what
note
is
so
if
we're,
if
they're
looking
at
it.
From
that
point
of
view,
then
then
yet,
but
it
actually
makes
sense.
The
problem
is,
is
that,
like
I
said
that
takes
quite
a
bit
longer
to
do.
B
So
what
I
would
suggest,
then,
if
people
are
up
for
it,
would
be
there's
a
board
meeting
scheduled
for
the
27th,
so
we
have
two
weeks
from
you
know
a
little
bit
less
than
two
weeks
to
figure
out.
If
this
is
something
we
want
to
bring
to
the
November
board
meeting,
we
can
invite
Brad
as
an
observer
for
next
week
or
at
the
very
least,
try
to
get
a
email
thread
going
with.
B
B
D
D
B
D
B
F
A
B
One
thing
that
I
think
that
we
could
do
really
quickly,
which
could
be
nice.
We
have
that
open.
The
open,
pull
request
from
Michael
Dawson
are
those
strategic
initiatives
which
has
a
list
of
initiatives
in
it.
Since
we
have
half
an
hour,
it
might
be
nice
to
run
through
that
and
get
an
update
from
the
people
who
are
currently
champions
for
initiatives
about
where
those
initiatives
are.
E
Restate
what
I
say
before
when
a
head
bed
microphone,
node
9.2?
This
is
regarding
an
ssl
node
9.2
shipped
with
compile
support
for
open
ssl
one
point:
1.0,
that's
vanilla,
1,
1,
0
G
onwards,
so
G
is
the
current
one
so
and
we're
testing
that
in
CI
now
so
every
commit
goes
through
and
runs
any
build
against
the
shared
open,
SSL,
1,
1
0
for
node,
9
and
10
branches,
and
that
means
that
we
could
switch
to
Note
2
1
1
1
1,
something
at
some
point
in
time
like
we're,
actually
testing
that
already.
E
So
it's
not
even
we're
not
even
patching
over
the
cell
for
that
to
work.
There's
one
test:
that's
failing!
It's
an
HTTP
to
test
the
Google
guy
that
did
the
commit
for
1
1
0.
The
changes
on
zero
said
that
there
was
something
wrong
in
the
way
we
were
doing
it.
This
is
sewing
in
the
HTTP
to
stuff.
It
needs
kind
of
a
new
tree
for
that.
So
I
need
to
push
on
that.
E
B
E
E
Sorry
right,
I'm,
not
convinced
about
6.
There
might
be
a
little
bit
old
because
it's
mostly
helpful
for
particularly
distros
that
are
starting
to
ship
one,
one,
something
I'm
not
seeing,
destroys
doing
that
yet
as
a
default.
So
I
think
the
pressure
is
pretty
low
on
this,
so
we
can
push
it
out
into
the
future
a
little
bit
and
also
until
we
know
more
about
the
OpenSSL
LTS
strategy
beyond
1:02.
E
B
E
A
All
right
so
I
do
think
it'd
be
good
to
get
a
sort
of
base
status
for
each
of
these
things.
But
those
rich
points
out
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
areas,
and
we
won't
have
time
to
talk
about
them
all
for
like
super
long.
So
if
we
try
to
keep
it
short,
that'd
be
great.
So
unless
anyone
doesn't
want
to
go
through
this
list
and
like
please
speak
up,
you
know
what
otherwise
I'm
gonna.
Kick
it
off.
A
D
Yeah
EPG
was
just
moving
forward.
We
have
additional
work
items
going
to
improve
the
internals
speed
them
up,
improve
air
handling.
That
kind
of
thing
we've
got
plenty
of
people
involved
working
on
it,
we've
actually
boarded
a
few
new
collaborators
who
came
in
specifically
because
of
HP
to
working
on
that.
D
B
A
I
I,
don't
know
like
much
I
can
say
to
nappy
stuff,
but
there
at
least
there's
what
I've
been
very
hearing
from
our
inertia
and
the
others.
When
we
met
a
Vancouver
and
like
in
Ireland
week
ago,
the
biggest
thing
we're
waiting
on
is
like
parting
modules
to
use
nappy
and
seeing
where
the
pain
points
are
it's
something
that
I
want
to
do
for
a
couple
of
my
modules
but
yeah
just
like
takes
time
and
I
bet,
basically
think
it's
not
a
pretty
good
crack
right
now.
Yeah
sounds.
I
Okay,
yes,
as
you
know,
there
has
been
a
forklift
node,
that's
called
IO.
Pretty
much
has
a
working
workers.
Implementation
at
this
point
requires
a
bit
of
refactoring
notes
internals,
but
for
a
better
embedding
of
node
itself
and
just
like
general
cleanup
James,
said
PR
open
a
while
ago
that
cherry
picked
some
of
these
patches
into
node
and
that
pyramid
some
resistance,
but
I
still
assume
been
notice,
is
not
really
on
board
with
the
multi-threading
approach
yeah.
But
basically,
that's
where
I'll
add
is
that.
D
D
The
task
right
now
is
to
go
through
those
and
as
much
as
possible,
pull
the
error
handling
into
JavaScript
like
checking
pipe
input,
types
and
those
kinds
of
things
and
then
see
what
is
remaining
still
in
C++
to
see
you
know
what
what
it
you
know,
what
other
additional
changes
are
necessary,
there's,
probably
just
under
300
errors
remaining
at
the
C++
level,
most
of
which
are
in
file
in
crypto
it.
So
it's
brother
large,
a
bit
of
functionality
to
go
through
it's
going
to
take
some
time.
A
Right
CV
management
jean-michel
is
not
here
to
go
over
that
I,
don't
know.
If
anyone
here
has
any
notes
on
not
not
sure
if
there's
any
progress
yet.
A
D
A
All
right
so
just
for
posterity
and
there's
been
quite
a
bunch
of
work
on
that
in
the
past
with,
and
so
they
didn't
get
anywhere,
so
we're
trying
to
move
its.
My
this
time
you
see
governance,
which
is
miles.
B
You
know,
like
a
higher
governance
level.
We
have
these
initiatives
that
we're
talking
about
right
now
that
we're
working
on
that
I'm
really
excited
about,
as
well
as
the
language
that
landed
regarding
expectations
for
leaders
in
the
project,
which
is
really
great,
I'd
have
to
double-check.
If
that
landed
in
a
minute
it
did,
but
it
could
be
mistaken
yeah,
so
that
landed.
That
was
like
a
huge
push
forward
for
us.
B
A
D
D
A
Yeah
I
agreed
on
that
I
will
have
time
studying
very
soon
to
start
more
work
on
that
so
yeah
probably
week
after
next
would
orb
work
meet
you
Diagnostics
is
Michael
Dawson
same
one
else
have
info
on
Diagnostics
initiatives.
G
Thing
that
might
be
worth
tracking
is
that
there
is
a
pull
request,
ready
to
go
to
add
tracer
and
to
icing
cooks
from
Andrus
mountain
that
probably
there
to
go
and
I'm
just
flagging
it,
because
we
were
talking
about
it.
It's
15,
538
and
I
think
it's
ready
to
go.
Okay,
it's
because
I'm
signing
off
for
some
people,
so
I'm
just
I
just
wanted
to
flag
it
before.
If
somebody
is
interested
because
that
kind
of
we
did
big
deal
yeah.
F
Moderation,
they
were
supposed
to
be
meeting
today,
but
we
decided
we
didn't
need
to
have
it
because
we
were
doing
our
getting
things
done.
You
know,
through
asynchronous
channels,
I
have
supposed
nothing
wants
to
report
there.
Quite
yet
there
will
be
more.
There
will
be.
There
will
be
stuff
to
report
in
the
coming
months
coming
weeks,
rather
just
the
final
few
steps
of
getting
it
stood
up
and
running
and
I
can
go
into
more
detail
with
that
with
anybody
who
wants
to
know,
but
right
now
just
trying
to
get
it
spun
up.
A
Okay,
Aysen
cooks
would
be
Trevor
Norris,
but
he's
not
here,
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
work
around
ironing
out
the
edges
of
a
Singh
cooks
right
now,
I'm,
not
sure
if
anyone
has
anything.
G
G
A
G
And
that's
what
what
is
an
issue
open,
which
is
more
or
less
ready
to
be
married,
so
we
are
probably
Glendon
this
soon
to
Nevada
the
later
and
the
question
about:
where
should
we
do
it?
I
propose
that
we
land
it
in
nine,
but
that's
my
take
but
okay,
it's
nobody
seems
to
object
to
that
I'm,
just
plugging
it
right.
A
G
B
So
we
recently
landed,
6.2
l
kg
are
into
master
and
it
came
out
in
nine
point
two.
There
is
an
issue
that
I
opened
to
kind
of
keep
track
of
all
the
commits
that
we're
floating
to
see.
You
know
like
what
needs
to
be
back
toward
it.
If
the
can
miss
six
point,
three
pull
request
is
building.
C
is
green,
which
is
awesome.
B
We
have
I
think
five
different
change,
change,
lists
that
we're
trying
to
get
back
ported
to
that
branch,
four
of
which
have
already
been
approved
to
it,
which
we've
landed
once
all
of
this
land.
We
should
be
able
to
land
six
point
three
onto
master
I.
Guess
we're
gonna
be
ahead
of
the
eight
ball
a
little
bit
in
the
past.
A
F
F
Debates
with
Brian
White
about
what
to
do
with
crankshaft
script,
currently
setting
up
a
kind
of
on
board
guy
bedford
after
that
I'm
gonna
on
board
John
moss.
If
anybody
wants
to
pick
off
people
on
board,
let
me
know
if
anybody
has
anybody
else
to
nominate,
look
for
the
open
collaborator,
nominations,
issue
and
nominate
them,
and
that's
all
for
onboarding.
As
far
as
on-ramp
goes,
we
had
a
pretty
successful
code
and
learn
in
Ireland
last
week,
and
your
gireesh
of
IBM
ran
one
at
his
company
his
office.
F
Subsequent
to
that
there's
a
few
other
people
have
been
asking
about
or
planning
on
running
code
and
learns
I
get
a
little
worried
about
that,
because
I
think
people
underestimate
the
amount
of
effort
and
and
the
amount
of
help
you'll
need
in
the
room
and
the
amount
of
preparation.
You
do
ahead
of
time
to
make
sure
people
don't
have
a
terrible
experience,
but
I
might
just
be
being
protective.
So
you
know
like
what
I
do
so
kind
of
gonna
just
watch
and
see
how
these
things
go.
F
Was
about
50
yeah?
We
did
one
the
definite
improvement
we
made
ahead
of
time.
I
were
I
talked
Rubin
talked
to
me
about
this
and
I
think
I
also
talked
to
a
couple
of
people,
I
read
back
and
maybe
Anatoly
I'm,
not
sure
was
you
know
we
we,
you
know
with
with
a
48
72
hour,
rule
relaxed
we're
able
to
land
them
a
lot
more
quickly,
and
so
hopefully
it
was
less
disruptive
to
their
collaborators.
Like
you
didn't
have
this,
you
know
massive
open
pr's
to
look
through
that
you
didn't
want
to
see.
F
A
E
A
And
then
we
have
two
more
listed
potential
initiatives:
I
suppose
that
don't
have
champions
mentoring
and
NSP
and
modules
and
I.
Don't
really
think,
there's
been
any
action
there
that
I
know
the
muss.
No
one
else
knows
of
it
so
generally,
if
we
feel
that
this
was
good
or
not
or
whatever.
Please
leave
that
information
in
the
TC
issue.
It's
three
nine
nine!
A
G
A
Sure
should
es6
import,
/
export
work
under
the
m
dot
m
dot,
j
s
without
honey
flags.
If,
yes,
then,
there's
only,
and
is
it
only
from
nine
version
of
note
so
I
think
at
least
some
of
what
you're
asking
so
yes,
modules
do
currently
work,
definitely
no
nine
under
a
flag.
It
is
not
a
harmony
flag,
the
flag
is
experimental
modules
and
that
will
that
uses
dot
m
j
s
without
the
two
dots
just
MJS
to
differentiate
what
is
a
module
mode
and
they
also
ask.
A
A
B
I
would
personally
say
that
it's
not
exactly
production
ready,
yet
the
specifics
of
how
import
is
going
to
work
and
Interop
is
going
to
work.
It's
still
being
worked
out
combining
that
with
the
fact
that
it's
not
necessarily
optimized
and
that
you
don't
have
access
to
lexically
scoped
variables,
like
underscore
underscore
dur
name
I,
don't
think
that
it
is
really
ready
for
production.
Yet
yeah.
A
I
would
say
it's
definitely
not
ready
for
production,
but
do
try
it
out
if
you
would
and
give
us
feedback
about
it.
Thanks
dan
asks
should
we
attempt
to
kicked
off
mentoring
under
the
con
com.
B
A
Maybe
someone
then
from
the
come-come
could
try
championing
it
then
I'm
not
really
sure
how
that
would
work
out
might
work
good.
We
don't
have
anyone
on
it,
so
someone
would
be
better
than
no
one
I
think
yeah
nice
joint
initiative,
a
nice
and
joint
initiative
in
my
dear
right.
Unless
anyone
has
anything
else,
I
think
we
can
call
it
there.
A
A
All
right
upcoming
meetings
tomorrow
at
I,
don't
know
what
these
are
in
UTC
or
how
to
change
my
calendar
to
UTC
right
now,
so
I'm
going
to
tell
you
in
Pacific
time
this
with
this
meeting
currently
was
2
to
3
p.m.
Pacific
time.
So
tomorrow,
at
10:30
to
11:30
Pacific
time
there
is
a
nappy,
napi
weekly
meeting
and
then
next
week
we
have
a
benchmarking
working
group
meeting
on
Monday,
that's
12
p.m.
to
1
p.m.
Pacific
on
Monday
and
then
directly
after
that
1
to
2
p.m.
Pacific
Monday.