►
From YouTube: Node.js User Feedback Initiative Meeting
Description
A
A
A
So,
just
to
set
things
up
last
week
at
the
community
committee
I
announced
to
the
community
committee
members
that
you
know
given
my
current
situation
of
work,
I
don't
have
the
bandwidth
to
continue
the
the
role
as
champion
of
music
feedback
and
we're
exploring.
You
know
what
what
the,
what
the
next,
what
the
next
steps
for
user
feedback
are.
We
we
now
have
the
open
jazz
initiative
and
the
super
see
there
and.
B
That
could
have
each
its
own
champion.
And
so
my
thinking
is
perhaps
you
know
I've
mentioned
in
the
past-
that
maybe
it
makes
sense
to
elevate
the
user
feedback
survey.
Part
of
it.
The
actual
execution
of
surveys
for
user
feedback,
elevate
that
up
to
the
open,
UJS,
Foundation
and
and
perhaps
under
the
cross
project
Council,
where
it
can
be
utilized
by
you
know
any
any
project
within
the
foundation
which,
to
me
I,
think
make
sense.
B
I'm
sure
lots
of
projects
have
lots
of
things
they'd
like
to
get
more
information
on
and
where,
if
we
have
a
framework
in
place
and
are
able
to
have
foundation
folks
help
us
actually
execute
the
survey
and
give
us
some
guidance
and
gather
the
data
and
deliver
it
back
and
a
usable,
useful
or
not.
Then
you
know
it
seems
to
me
to
make
sense
that
we
kind
of
take
that
up
a
level
and
I.
Can
you
know
try
to
continue
championing
that
efforts
beyond
that?
B
It
seems
to
me
as
though
there
there
is
a
perhaps
two
other
areas
that
could
have
champions,
and
perhaps
at
least
one
of
them
already
does.
Although
you
know
we
all
get
a
little
busy
now
and
again,
one
being
the
enterprise
of
feedback
and
the
other
being
the
in-person
user
feedback
sessions
and
meetups
and
such
so.
My
my
suggestion
is
that
maybe
we
break
those
things
up,
maybe
we
don't
even
need,
like
an
overarching
user
feedback
working
group
to
oversee
each
of
those.
B
A
A
A
B
Believe
so
we're
we're
fleshing
out
like
a
standards
working
group
as
well
as
an
infrastructure
working
group
and
I,
would
imagine
that,
like
they
use
their
feedback
survey,
working
group
could
be
there
as
well
I
mean
maybe
it's
not
so
much
a
working
group
I
have
to
look
at
what
the
guidance
is
on
particular
initiatives,
but
it
seems
like
you
know.
If,
if
not,
then
we
can
propose
that
we
make
that
an
available
Avenue
that
we
could
go
down
and
some
format
yeah.
C
I
think
I
mean
there's,
certainly
the
concept
of
teams
and
delegating
work
to
teams.
This
was
always
a
team
anyway,
so
I
think
like.
If
the
you
know,
the
survey
team
makes
sense
to
me
at
that
level,
because
you're
right
that
you
know
they're
more
than
just
know
who,
like
surveys
and
there's
a
good
link
with
you,
know,
leveraging
the
foundational
resources
to
those
out
I.
C
Think
that's
that's
a
good
one.
The
the
suggestion
of
you
know
having
them
run
separately,
makes
sense.
To
me
I
mean
we
don't
necessarily
need
to
get
together.
If
there's
being
you
know
this
being
discussed,
moving
forward,
I
think
then
so
it's
it
we'd
need
the
champion
in
order.
We
need
somebody
at
least
own
to
organize
and
be
the
contact
for
the
red.
A
A
B
Ideally,
my
goal
would
be
to
have
it
the
sort
of
self
service
and
not
need
so
much
hand-holding,
but
to
lean
on
when
you
know
something
breaks
down
or
or
you
know
what
I
don't
know
if
we're
there
yet
and
then
in
fact,
on
the
way
to
this
meeting,
Michael
I
was
wondering
about.
There
was
something
that
someone
was
requesting:
a
user
feedback
survey
a
few
weeks
ago
and
I'm
I,
don't
know
if
that
sort
of
fell
through
the
cracks
or,
if
I
missed
something
or
still,
where
I
think
in
the
Marlin.
It.
B
C
No
I
think
that's
a
great
idea,
I
mean
and
then
that
that
leaves
the
impersonal
feedback
and
you
know
I
I
I
still
think
that's
important,
but
I
can't
step
up
at
this
point
because
I
got
enough
other
things
going
on
and
I.
Don't
know,
though
we
have
any
other
volunteers,
so
maybe
that
we
just
kind
of
put
that
on
you
know
we
let
that
rest
for
a
little
while
until.
B
C
C
You
know
what
I
would
I
thought.
It
went
thought
it
was
like
if
we
could
form
a
group
of
people
who
were
entrusted
users
kind
of
like
the
enterprise
users
who
are
like
hey,
we
use
node
we're
interested,
and
then
we
can
bounce
things
off
of
them.
So
when
we
have
questions,
we
could
bounce
questions
off
them.
You
know
we
could
have
a
little
bit
more
engagement
to
try
and
hear
from
the
pulse
in
terms
of
what
you
know
are
they
running
into
problems?
C
So
the
the
goal
was
to
have
a
closer
contact
with
a
set
of
real
node
users
that
we
could.
Then
you
know
used
to
make
to
help
us
and
you
know,
make
good
decisions.
We've
tried
a
few
different
things
like
we
tried
setting
up
a
meeting
where
we
invited
people,
and
you
know,
then
we
moved
from
that
to
trying
to
do
it
as
part
of
our
own
meetup.
C
And
then
you
know
we
try
we
the
most
recent
one
is,
you
know:
we've
done
a
few
in
person
like
in
existing
meetup
horns,
but
I
guess
so
far
we
haven't
had
tons
of
feedback
and
we
also
haven't
had
like
an
ongoing
relationship
which
was
kind
of
what
it
was
hoping.
We
would
get
right
like
it's,
not
so
much
about
just
meeting
with
people
once
and
saying
hey.
What
are
your
problems
but
having
building
that
link
to
the
users
was
where
I
thought
we'd
get
the
real
value.
A
Last
couple
meetings
here
you
know
the
Enterprise
Group
has
had
some
pull
the
you
know,
general
user
feedback
space
is,
is
something
that
you
know
we.
We
basically
tried
to
balance
the
interest
that
we
see
in
the
enterprise
space
with
like
what
about
everybody
else,
and
you
know
there
isn't
a
lot
of
poll
there,
whether
it's
in
person,
whether
it's
online,
you
know
it
just
doesn't
seem
like
there's.
A
You
know
a
lot
of
pain
in
need.
Folks,
you
know
from
the
in-person
sessions
are
relatively
happy
with
the
state
of
node,
but
able
to
get
the
latest
and
greatest
node,
and
you
know
kind
of
the
depth
of
frustration.
Is
you
know?
Aws
land
is
a
bit
slow
on
getting
to
latest
node
right,
but
like
not
really
stopping
folks
from
shipping
what
they
want.
B
B
A
B
I
generally
agree
with
what
you're,
saying
and
I
agree
with
Tierney
sentiment.
I
think
you
know
when
when
when
it's
not
working
or
it's
run
of
course-
and
you
know,
we
shouldn't
be
a
dead
horse
and
can
always
come
back
to
it.
If
we
feel
the
me,
however,
I
do
have
something
to
throw
out
there
that
I
thought
I'd.
You
know.
B
Maybe
we
should
ponder
a
little
bit,
especially
you
know
the
three
of
us
coming
from
enterprise
nodes
places
and
I
wonder
about
facilitating
more
of
an
online
Town
Hall
and
what
I'm
envisioning
is
if
we
could
have
some
moderators
as
well
as
people
from
you
know,
node
core
and
the
platform
as
well
as
people
from
like
cloud
providers.
You
know
IBM
Microsoft,
Google
AWS.
B
What
have
you
be
kind
of
available
and
and
and
and
try
to
facilitate
questions
and
responses
between
end-users,
who
perhaps
you
know,
have
different
pain,
points
and
again
I'm
thinking
a
moderator
would
you
know,
would
highlight
the
find
and
highlight
ones
that
bring
the
you
know
value
to
the
conversation
not
like
what
is
you
know
little.
You
know
my
new
questions
and
whatnot.
So
I
just
wonder
if
there's
a
way
to
facilitate
a
broader
conversation
between
end-users
platform
developers
as
well
as
like
you.
B
E
C
That's
already
a
place
where
users
can
come
in
and
ask
questions,
and
so
we
would
need
to
be
not
I.
Have
this
specific
problem,
but
it's
like
more
I.
Have
this
macro
problem
right,
yeah,
yeah,
and
that's
why
I'm
like
we
would
need
to
leaned
on
model
I,
don't
see
it
as
a
as
a
hey
solve
my
today
problem
thing:
it's
more
solved
right!
I,
think
this
is
the
wrong
going
in
the
wrong
direction.
I
kind
of
thing,
yeah.
B
A
I,
like
I
like
the
idea,
largely
in
the
it
places
a
active
incentive
with
you,
know
the
organizers
and
participants
to
engage
and
participate
right.
So
you
know
that
seems
seems
interesting.
It
does
sound
a
lot
like
you
know
the
organ
we've
been
grinding,
so
you
know
I
want
to
flag
that
Ava.
Are
you
in
a
place
where
you
can
chat
on
your
driving
I.
A
F
A
Right,
so
you
know,
Joe,
just
sort
of
you
know
take
take
the
the
thought,
your
thoughts
there
and
and
thread
them
through.
You
know,
there's
the
a
mas
which
is
is
handling.
You
know
that
sort
of
general
forum-
and
you
know
it
can
be
used
that
it
could
be
used
as
that
sounding
board.
For
is
there.
You
know
deeper
need
and
do
we
need
to
do
something
about
it.
Then,
alongside
of
this
initiative,
the
outreach
initiative
has
been
picking
up
steam.
A
So
a
lot
of
what
we
did
find
in
setting
up
the
meetings
and
reaching
out
to
meet
up
organizers
is
those
meetup
organizers
are
very
interested
in
getting
you
know,
content
from
you
know
the
Foundation
and
from
the
other
folks
around
the
world.
So
if
we
can,
you
know
help
facilitate.
If
someone
can
help
facilitate
that,
you
know,
that's
a
need
and
it
and
it's
not
that's
not
really
user
feedback,
but
it's
it
is
a
you
know.
It
does
take
care
of
a
lot
of
those
and
user
needs.
You.
C
Cool
so
I
mean
I.
Think
I
think
your
other
idea
is
is
like
another
idea.
It
still
comes
back
to
like
do.
We
have
somebody
who's
gonna
push
on
that
front
or
or
do
we
say
you
know
for
now?
Let's,
let's
let
it
you
know,
have
a
rest
and-
and
you
know
the
other
to
think
like
I
think
you
know
the
the
user
do
user
surveys
I
think
that's
important
to
find
a
good
home
for
which
is
good.
C
The
enterprise
one
I
think
we
already
have
a
matt
who's
the
champion
and
the
other
piece
like
I,
think
we've
tried
out
a
number
of
different
things,
and
unless
we
have
somebody,
who's
got
the
time
and
energy
to
think
about
what
else
we
can
try
like
I'm
kind
of
gotten
to
the
point
where
it's
like.
It's
probably
okay
to
you
know,
take
a
break
for
a
while,
and
then
you
know,
maybe
a
few
months
from
now
we
have
ideas
or
new
energy
or
whatever
yeah.
B
So
my
expectation
is
that
all
the
work
that
I've
done
on
user
feedback
surveys
is
to
try
and
build
out
a
framework
where
it
would
be
self
served
in
terms
of
projects.
Having
specific
survey
needs
yeah,
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
if
we're
there,
yet
so
I'm
still
kind
of
on
call
for
trying
to
help
things
go
through.
But
the
expectation
is
that
you
know
we
have
an
issue
template
that
tries
to
clearly
define
what
we
would
expect
from
a
project
wanting
to
initiate
a
survey.
B
B
You
know
and
in
terms
of
getting
data
and
then
the
foundation
would
execute
the
survey
and
deliver
the
results
back
in
a
consumable
format,
so
that
that's
my
expectation
and
I
and
I'm
happy
to
champion
bringing
that
to
the
CPC
and
and
then
you
know,
continue
to
champion
it
to
kind
of
get
it
off
the
ground
and
make
sure
that
it's
running
well
and
then,
hopefully,
at
a
certain
point,
there
will
be
sort
of
self-serve
and
the
foundation
can
kind
of
just
speed.
The
executors.
Okay.
A
E
A
I
stepped
down
as
champion
of
this
effort
and
there's
no
one
continuing
this
effort.
The
Enterprise
Group
is,
you
know,
still
interested
in
continuing
on,
and
they
have
someone
admit.
Maybe
that's
just
Achmed
would
need
to
bring
that
proposal
to
the
CPC.
I'm
sure
you
know,
I
think
the
very
least
would
appreciate
you
know
someone
to
lean
on
I
am.
C
Not
sure
that
that
beats
yeah
but
I,
don't
think
that
needs
to
change.
So
we
could
stay,
we
we
could
still
say
we
have
the
enterprise
user
feedback
group
under
calm,
calm,
I'm
happy
to
be
like
if
we
and
we
have
Ahmad
as
the
champion
and
we
need
somebody
on
the
comm
come
to
that.
He
can
lean
on
I'm
happy
to
be
that
person.
B
Yeah,
that's
what
I
was
thinking
too.
This
still
seems
kind
of
node
specific.
If
it
is
not
note
specific,
then
I
would
be
happy
to
have
that
conversation
to
bring
it
up
to
the
CPC.
But
to
me
it
still
seemed
like
a
node
specific
thing
and
keeping
it
under
calm
calm,
as
its
own
team
makes
sense
to
me.
Yeah.
C
B
C
B
C
Back
yeah
well
great,
so
basically
we
could
just
say:
let's
leave
this
repo,
as
is
we're
just
gonna
mess
d
schedule.
The
regular
meetings
and
I
used
your
feet.
The
the
enterprise
user
feedback
team
can
continue
to
use
it,
and
you
know
we'll
see
how
that
goes.
If
there's
some
reason
to
change
going
forward,
we
could
do
that
right.
A
C
E
C
Of
you,
with
a
slightly
yeah
I,
mean
I.
Think
we
want
to
get
a
mad
as
the
champion
with
me.
Is
the
community
committee
crap
or
something
we've
been
even
had
discussions
about
like
how
do
we
get
the
you
know,
external
champions
in
right,
mm-hmm
right
so
well,
yeah.
We
can
do
that
as
a
first
step
and
it
should
just
be
and
I
think
we
should
include
Matt.
Is
the
the
leader
champion
right
and
I'm,
just
the
link
champion
cool
I.