►
From YouTube: Node.js Website Redesign Meeting - 2018/02/15
Description
B
Perfect,
okay,
hello,
everyone
welcome
into
the
second
to
the.
What
is
it?
What
which,
what
day
is
it?
It's?
The
15th
15th
of
February
website
website
redesign
initiative
meeting
on
me,
yeah
on
the
15th
February
18.
Let's
get
started,
let's
do
a
little
roll
call.
I.
Think,
therefore,
time
for
that.
So
everyone
just
told
these
are
not
speaking
like
cried
Lee
I'm
Nick
I'm
sitting
like
a
public
space
I'm
trying
to
not
be
too
now.
Okay,
we
can
hear
you
loud
and
clear.
That's
cool!
That's
the
most
important
thing!
B
A
B
D
B
B
A
B
Cool
okay:
we've
got
that
done.
Let's
go
over
to
the
agenda.
We
have
four
items
on
our
geometry:
just
like
to
differentiate
this
from
the
last
meeting,
we've
kind
of
switched
over
from
just
putting
text
items
on
that
direction,
associated
and
weather,
with
an
existing
get
up
issue,
which
is
what
I
think
most
other
working
groups
and
committees
do
it's
kind
of
better
for
tracking
kind
of
better
for
following
up
on
things.
So
we
have
three
from
our
own
repository
and
one
from
the
community
committee
which
kyani
bought
them.
B
E
Yeah
for
the
first
I
just
compiled
the
current
website
structure
and
even
found
some
parts
which
are
not
currently
linked,
so
we
didn't
have
more
content
that
we
are
actually
showing
on
the
website.
We
have
the
knowledge
base,
which
is
currently
not
visible
on
the
website,
with
lots
of
articles
and
I
just
started
to
put
labels
on
it
all
the
different
parts
of
the
website
to
get
a
rough
structure.
What
a
new
information
architecture
could
possibly
look
like
I.
A
Would
like
to
say
that
we
should
also
probably
make
sure
we're,
including
this
sub
sites,
that
we
have,
because
it's
it's
a
super,
useful
thing
that
almost
nobody
knows
about,
and
it's
a
huge
waste
for
us
to
like
have
that
data
and
not
really
be
able
to
share
publicly
or
visibly
I.
Don't
know
if
that's
involved
in
here,
oh
wow,
yeah,
that's
massive,
but
yeah.
I
know
that
stuff
isn't
super
visible.
So.
C
A
B
B
A
B
B
B
C
A
C
Yeah
so
I
I
don't
know
if
anybody
else
has
has
thought
about
a
traffic
with
holes
in
this,
but
it
might
be
nifty
to
start
trying
if
we
can
get
general
consensus
and
moving
forward.
Wireframes
would
be
awesome
to
see
to
actually
you
know
and
I
with
it
in
a
process-oriented
way
figure
out.
If
there's
any
holes
in
this,
this
structure
mm-hmm,
who
needs
it,
doesn't
meet.
C
Something
like
that
and
I,
though
only
so
I've
I've,
either
use
illustrator
or
there's
an
online
tool
you
can
use
for
free
I,
always
forget
what
it's
called.
It
is
Google
online
wire,
framing
tool,
I
wireframe
dot,
see
see
it
also
works
pretty
well.
If
you
don't
have
the
Adobe
Suites
on
your
computer,
I'm
sure
you
could
also
use
sketch
or
wire
framing
as
well,
if
I
do
yeah,
so
those
are
kind
of
the
three
that
I
have
used
in
the
best.
So.
F
A
Because
it's
not
super
accessible
and
it
kind
of
makes
the
barrier
a
little
bit
higher
to
contributing
that
said,
I
I,
don't
you
know,
I
think
it
should
be
up
to
this
group
and
you
need
to
be
influenced
by
outside
group
outside
groups,
but
I
did
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know
y'all
had
that
context.
Yeah.
C
C
D
C
D
B
A
Do
think
I
know
he's
not
in
the
meeting
I
think
he
was
a
little
too
short
notice
for
him,
but
I
know
Timothy
would
probably
be
interested
in
helping
out
with
that.
He
already
sent
me
a
little
bit
of
a
brief
design
like
template,
just
that
he
was
kind
of
spitballing
on
ideas,
so
I
know
he
might
be
willing
to
help
with
that.
That's.
B
C
B
B
B
A
Know
I
think
I
think
that
there's
I
mean
Adams
structure.
There's
definitely
you
know
in
the
learn
section,
there's
getting
started
and
I
do
think.
We
really
need
to
take
care
of
that.
I
think
one
thing
that
I've
been
seeing.
People
do
more
of
recently,
and
this
is
kind
of
one
of
the
reasons
I
brought
up.
The
messaging
discussion
is
that's
and
that's
another
agenda
item
is
you
know.
A
Note
is
so
versatile
that,
like
he's
scoping
it
down
to
a
web
server
or
scoping
it
down
to
a
command
line
app
or
you
know
that
doesn't
work,
there's
too
many
things
you
can
do
with
node
and
so
having
a
few
different
ways
to
get
started
like
some
of
the
things
we
see
most
commonly
would
probably
be
most
beneficial
for
us.
I
think
that
could
all
fit
in
that
getting
started
section.
E
C
E
F
A
C
A
A
And
I
think
another
thing
that
we
should
definitely
make
sure
to
include
I.
Don't
think
we
need
to
do
this
at
the
beginning
here,
but
we
should
have
it
on
our
radar
of
working
with
the
foundation
on
certification
material
by
just
making
sure
we
have
at
least
bits
covered,
even
if
it's
just
what
they
provide
for
it.
Making
sure
we
have
that
content
would
be
helpful
in
general.
C
Okay,
yeah
I
love
for
that
issue,
to
keep
having
resources
link
there
and
hopefully
have
it
turn
into
a
I'd
love
to
see
a
full
curriculum.
Eventually,
they'll
start
to
finish.
I
guess
get
fleshed
out
and
we
might.
We
may
have
all
the
content
that
we
need
already
just
scattered
across
the
site,
but
yeah
having.
B
F
A
F
C
C
B
Like
my
sort
of
experience
is
one
of
the
sort
of
points
I
liked
the
most
is
the
Haskell
side.
I,
don't
know
if
anyone's
ever
like
another
NASCAR
sort
of
them.
It's
just
like
traditionally
very
intimidating
language
and
I
think
they
have
like
an
interactive
command
line
tutorial
with
custom
commands
and
stuff,
which
makes
it
very
portable.
In
my
opinion,
no
it
doesn't
have
that
same
reputation,
I,
don't
think,
but
it
might
still
be
nice
just
to
kind
of
get
some
early
concepts
of
like
callbacks
and
promises
and
stuff
across.
Maybe.
A
A
A
I,
do
think
that
this
is
there's
a
few
approaches
that
we
could
take
on
this
one
is
like
literally
embedding
something
like
a
hacker
rank
or
not
occurring
and
there's
some
like
code
sandbox
code
tool
that
you
can
do
for
that.
There's
also
we
can
just
kind
of
mock
instead
of
actually
do
like
running
another
process.
A
Iii
think
that
this
is
probably
gonna
take
a
lot
of
effort
on
our
part,
just
to
figure
out
exactly
that.
The
best
path
and
I
mean
it's
hard
because
note
I,
I,
guess
we
need
to
see
how
server-side
tools
do
it
more
consistently
and
how
they
actually
the
implementation
details,
not
just
like
the
visual
or
the
interactive
site,
but
the
implementation
of
okay
they're,
putting
this
in
a
container
or
they
actually
running
like
Python
in
the
browser
like
how
are
they
going
about
doing
this
I
think?
That's
you
know.
A
B
A
B
C
A
A
Mean
coded
code,
Academy
is
also
another
one
that
does
similar
things
and
I
know.
They've
never
had
a
no
js'
course
much
to
my
dismay,
so
that
might
be.
You
know
another
way
for
us
to
kind
of
work
with
them
on
that,
and
maybe
even
get
that
copper
like
a
course
for
that
into
code
Academy
before
you
know,
embedding
it
in
the
node
site,
yeah.
B
B
A
A
What
did
platform
take?
You
know
you
can
run
JavaScript
on
the
server
side
ways
and
that
messaging
I
I
think
we've
kind
of
outgrown
that
we
probably
outgrew
that,
like
five
or
six
years
ago,
but
you
know
I
I,
don't
think
anyone's
paid,
much
attention
to
that,
or
at
least
not
significantly
enough
to
really
have
to
figure
out
what
comes
after
it,
and
so
like
I,
was
kind
of
saying
earlier
with
you
know
how
note
is
so
expensive
and
can
do
so
much
at
this
point.
A
A
Hey,
that's
it's
the
iteration
of
the
older
one,
but
it
still
does
mention
like
a
venture
of
and
non-blocking
I/o
model
that
makes
a
lightweight
and
efficient
I
I,
don't
know.
I,
don't
feel
like
that,
really
like
just
someone
who's
trying
to
get
started
with
node.
That
doesn't
really
say
much
I
mean
unless
they're
like
an
extremely
experienced
programmer,
who
understands
different
like
walking,
IO
and
a
non-event
River
model
that
that
would
mean
something
but
I
think
saying
something
more.
Generic
would
probably
be
more
effective
for
us
in
the
long
run.
D
B
C
C
Know
if
you're,
not
if
you
haven't
been
working
with
computers,
your
entire
life,
a
lot
of
those
words,
don't
mean
a
lot
to
you,
yeah.
So,
looking
at
looking
at
the
kind
of
de
facto
new
developer
website,
w3schools
nodes
described
as
note
as
an
open
source
server
framework.
No
jeaious
allows
you
to
run
JavaScript
on
the
server
good.
C
A
Know
it
was
mentioned
in
that
there's
you
know
in
that
issue
miles
mentioned
that
there's
quite
a
few
stakeholders,
the
foundation,
the
TLC
the
website
itself.
You
know
there's
quite
a
few
people
who
have
input
into
this
or
should
have
input
I
I,
don't
think
we
necessarily
want
to
go
down
the
path
of
design
by
committee.
I
think
we
should
try
to
get
a
few
proposed
and
then
push
it
from
there,
but
I
guess
for
the
website
redesign.
Is
this
something
that
this
team
would
be
interested
in
taking
on?
A
You
know,
I
I'd
like
to
report
back
to
the
compound
whether
or
not
this
team
would
be
interested
in
taking
that
on
as
part
of
the
kind
of
ongoing
work
that's
being
put
into
this,
and
that
would
include
you
know
inviting
probably
a
member
of
the
foundation
into
one
of
the
meetings
and
kind
of
discussing
it
a
little
bit
but
or
orth.
You
know
the
compound
can
try
to
figure
out
what
to
do
with
it
outside
of
the
website.
Redesign
I.
E
Think
it's
a
little
bit
more
than
just
a
blurb
on
the
front
page.
We
already
discussed
this
website
issue.
Well,
there
are
two
resources
coming
from
MailChimp
once
their
style
guide
and
they
have
a
separate
website,
voice
and
tone.
Where
is
where
they
describe
how
they
do
brand
communications
and
what
kind
of
voice
and
tone
they
use
for
different
situations,
and
it's
really
an
acceptable
cool
guide
for
all
kinds
of
situations,
how
to
to
communicate
and
how
to
unified
voice
for
the
entire
brand.
So
this
rule.
A
Yeah
I
definitely
agree,
then
there's
actually
existing
content
that
I
hope
to
work
on
or
I
might
have
written
entirely
in
the
evangelism
repo,
specifically
social
media
style
guide,
I'll
paste
it
in
the
zoom
chat,
but
it
can
probably
be
abstracted
a
little
bit
it's
more
about
right,
general,
writing
and
language,
and
things
like
that
with
the
examples.
So
I
got
quite
a
bit
of
feedback
on
this
when
I
guess
yeah,
myself
and
men
who
worked
on
it
so
yeah.
A
D
D
B
B
A
A
One
thing
I
will
say:
is
that
going
into
a
full
kind
of
style
guide,
we
will
definitely
need
to
make
sure
to
coordinate
pretty
heavily
with
the
foundation
just
to
make
sure
it
doesn't
step
on
toes
there
and
that
they
are.
They
have
they're
buying
into
it
as
well.
I,
don't
think
there
will
be
an
issue
there,
but
I
just
again
wanted
to
make
sure
everything's
everything
that'll
come
up
is
probably
no
is
no
well
so.
A
That's
not
to
say
that
we're
not
looking
forward
to
that
time
when
it
is,
you
know
when
we
do
get
it
go
address
those,
but
we
have
other
things
that
we
need
to
prioritize
first
before
digging
into
that
level,
because
that'll,
if
we
start
getting
into
that
now,
we'll
start
slowing
down
a
bit.
But
we
really
do
want
to
kind
of
push
this
forward
as
far
as
we
can
and
get
to
that
point
where
we
can
safely
do
that
without
losing
momentum
as
soon
as
possible,
I.
F
B
A
D
At
the
last
meeting,
I
think
from
the
minutes
all
I
could
tell
was
that
it.
It
would
be
a
minimum
of
six
months
for
this
project,
and
people
seem
to
agree
with
that.
If
I
remember
correctly,
it's
two
weeks,
yeah
I,
also
wonder
if,
while
we
agreed
on
the
minimum,
we
should
also
think
of
when
we
do
want.
This
should
be
done.
A
When
we
don't
necessarily
even
know
everything
that's
going
to
be
happening
before
those
so
baby,
a
good
approach
would
be
to
you
know
at
the
beginning
of
each
meeting
or
each
section
you
know
try
to
address.
You
know
how
long
do
we
think
this
is
gonna?
Take
and
like
every
meeting
or
every
other
meeting
assess
if
we're
in
line
with
that
or
if
we
need
to
adjust
it
and
then
surface
that
you
know
in
the
minutes.
B
B
Cool
okay,
so
do
you
wanna,
like
I,
don't
know?
Do
you
wanna
go
with
the
estimate
thingy,
where
we
try
the
estimate
how
long
I'll
take
every
like
why
we
try
to
adjust
the
estimate
on
a
regular
basis,
essentially,
which
is
I,
think
what
Jenni
suggests
7th
yeah?
Okay,
do
you
want
to
go
with
that?
Yeah.
A
A
C
C
It's
having
every
line
of
content
written
which
I
think
wouldn't
necessarily
be
a
bad
thing,
especially
if
we're
going
through
a
contractor
for
design,
then
we're
gonna
need
a
little
more
time
than
if
we're
just
agreeing
on
top
level
menu
items
and
general
content
structure.
So
I.
My
my
gut
reaction
for
immediate
future
like
the
next
two
weeks.
I
would
be
sad
if,
at
the
next
meeting,
we
weren't
able
to
review
a
not
complete
but
fairly
comprehensive,
wireframe
and
at
least
have
some
content
fleshed
out
for
a
just
V
0
of
the
learn
page.
C
F
E
C
And
especially
when
we
want
to
be
deep
dive
into
that
flow,
there's
a
lot
of
information
currently
in
the
download
matrix,
which
is
very
sorry
I'm
about
to
get
to
in
the
weeds,
for
this
discussion,
I
think,
there's
improvement
to
be
made
for
the
download
matrix
to
simplify
it,
but
still
offer
the
complexity
that
we
have
currently
to
users
who
need
that
that
would
be
it's.
It's
a
it's
a
fun
little
design
problem
to
solve
for
anybody
who's
interested
in
tackling
it.
I.