►
Description
Paper Discussion: Hierarchical organization of cortical and thalamic connectivity (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1716-z)
There may be other topics.
A
A
I'm
offered
to
look
at
it,
I'm
gonna
start
with
a
disclaimer
that
this
is
a
very
the
actual
paper
itself
is
eight
pages
long,
but
there's
a
huge
amount
of
supplementary
material.
It's
it
was
a
difficult
paper
for
me
to
digest
carefully
so
I
did
not
attempt
to
digest
it
carefully.
I'm
gonna
do
a
very
cursory
review.
The
paper
and
I
apologize
to
people
who
worked
on
it
so
hard.
Then
I'm
gonna
give
it
a
very
short
cursory
review.
It
came
out
of
the
Allen
Institute
the
way
I
view
it.
A
It's
really
a
paper,
that's
documenting
a
huge
amount
of
anatomical
connections
in
the
cortex,
including
the
cortex
and
the
thalamus,
and
so
I
kind
of
beautifully
back
to
the
the
famous
film
and
vanesa
paper
of
91,
where
they
had
this
huge
table
of
connectivity
between
cortical
regions
and
they
produced
that
famous
map
that
we've
seen.
This
is
sort
of
a
modern
update
to
that
and
choosing
new
techniques.
Very
highly
automated
techniques
at
the
allen,
stitute
pioneered
using
genetic
Mouse
lines
to
make
it
get
put
data
and
better
data.
A
But
at
the
end,
mostly,
what
they're
reporting
on
here
is
the
data
and
is
it's
quite
complex,
so
I'm
not
I'm,
actually
not
going
to
go
through
much
of
it.
I'm
just
going
to
point
out
the
kind
of
things
that
you
I
don't
want
to
point
out
a
couple
things
here
in
the
very
beginning,
so
they
I
guess
this
is
still
the
overview
or
introduction
sort
of
basic
thoughts.
You
know
that
I
kind
of
felt
a
little
bit
aged
you
know,
like
sonic
nuclei,
make
important
contributions
of
cortical
function.
That
is,
of
course,
true.
A
They
serve
as
a
relay
for
primary
sensory
information,
I
kind
of
view
that,
as
a
sort
of
a
error
by
omission
that
that's
like
the
old
way
of
thinking
about,
but
we
now
know
they're
much
more
important
than
that.
Really
we
like
to
think
about
it,
these
projections
through
the
thalamus
and
a
well
as
they
say
you
know
the
cortex
so
there,
including
the
thalamus,
and
this
right,
where
the
thumb
and
Vanessa
guys
didn't
include
us
in
this
kind
of
stuff.
A
So
it
was
a
relay
for
Primus
information,
a
well-positioned
to
influence
cortical
information
processing,
which
is
building
much
so
reciprocal
or
transfer
line,
recluse
and
I
kind
of
do
that,
also
as
a
than
old
way
of
thinking
about
it,
that
we
now
know
that
the
projections
to
the
thalamus
and
the
cortex
are
not
really
these
reciprocal
loops
their
feet
forward
and
feedback.
It's
not
like
this
information
is
just
cycling
around
the
routes.
I
thought
this
wouldn't
serve
that
you
skip
over
here.
So.
C
A
So
what
I
want
to
jump
to
in
more
the
same,
even
these
I
like
these
kind
of
diagrams,
but
even
here
I
found
this
very
difficult
to
digest,
and
so
I
wasn't
willing
to
put
the
time
into
it.
I'm
just
being
honest
about
it,
because
really
the
point
of
this,
this
is
a
data
set
as
opposed
to
there.
They
make
very
few
summaries
I
want
to
point
out
a
few
summaries.
They
do
make
here
towards
the
end
here
and
that's
why
I
said
this
is
going
to
be
very
short
talk
about
this
thing.
A
First
of
all,
this
was
an
interesting
point.
I
just
call
this
out,
because
it's
a
piece
I
wasn't
aware
of
and
I
want
to
look
into
this
burglar
at
some
point
in
time.
He
they
I,
just
pulled
out
this
one
little
sentence
that
gee
I
miss
that
and
this,
but
it's
must
be
in
there.
I
need
to
go
look
at
this
more.
They
say
we
showed
that
layer
for
no
demons,
finding
Stella
taste
compact
at
long-range
projections.
That
is
contrary
to
most
from
thinking
about
the
cortex,
yeah
and
I.
A
Think
that
would
be
very
important
to
understand.
Better
and
I
didn't
have
the
chance
to
look
and
understand
it
better.
Yet
so
what
percentage
of
them,
how
they're
bringing
where
do
they
protect
other
things
that
I
would
say
to
expanded
this
a
few
more
sentences
right
here
to
say
what
did
we
find?
This
seems
predictive
because
that
otherwise
up
the
bat
look
at
all
that
data,
this
one
I
thought
was
really
very
interesting.
A
There's
a
hierarchy
that
we
find
so
they're
really
analyzing
is
the
cortex
I've
got
these
42
regions
are
the
hierarchical
connected,
and
so
how-
and
they
say
the
fires
we
find
is
shallower.
There
might
have
been
expected
even
with
the
inclusion
of
polemic
regions,
the
difference
between
the
lowest
and
the
highest
levels
that
lasted
two
full
levels
and
all
area.
Conductivity
global
score
is
at
ninety
percent
between
random
and
privilege,
hierarchical
I
think
actually
I
don't
didn't
dig
into
what
they
meant
by
that
global
score.
A
D
A
A
They
did
not
talk
about
it
being
the
reason
is
it
just
shallow,
but
they
did
point
them
like
the
characters
into
the
mouse
in
their
project.
Fine,
it
does
say
especially
what's
going
on
in
primate,
but
it's
still
important
distinction.
Mice
are
pretty
damn
smart
in
the
division
is
pretty
damn
good
and
and
they
you
know
they
they
it's
not
like.
A
It
shows
an
animal,
a
mammal
can
have
a
vision
system
or
a
hold
of
the
hierarchical
system.
It's
not
relying
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
hiring
and
that's
important,
and
it
surely
fits
whether
a
lot
of
our
theories.
You
know
where
there's
a
lot
of
points
in
this
paper,
where
they,
these
kind
of
data,
sit.
Well,
that's
what
we've
proposed
this
one
is
another
example
right
here,
notably
hierarchical
position
alone,
does
not
explain
all
the
connections
of
a
given
area.
This
complexity
may
be
what
some
have
our
heartbeats
overly
simplistic
for,
describing
functional
properties.
A
Well,
we
think
it
is,
and
so
I
think
in
general,
this
data
supports
sort
of
the
thousand
brain
theory,
a
theory
of
cortical
regions
being
full
modeling
systems
each
and
every
one,
but
really
the
summary.
This
paper
really
is
again:
it's
not
about
reaching
conclusions
like
this.
It
really.
The
bulk
of
the
paper
is
all
about
presenting
the
data
and
making
available
other
researchers
and
how
they
collected
it,
and-
and
that
way
it's
very
useful,
but
it's
also
difficult
to
digest
in
a
simplistic
form.
That's
reticle
form
like
we
like
to
do
so.
A
At
this
point,
I
didn't
you
know,
I
didn't
go
through
all
of
that,
but
it's
a
but
it's
there
and
it's
a
useful
contribution.
The
same
way
that
the
original
film
on
finessing
paid
paper
had
pages
and
pages
and
pages
of
anatomical
data,
which
is
useful,
but
you
can't
really
absorb
it.
Simply
that's
what
I'm
going
to
say
about
this
bigger.
C
A
It's
just
connections,
I,
wouldn't
know
if
it's
the
connectome
in
the
sense
that
connect
on
again
refers
to
a
much
more
detailed
connectivity
graph,
which
is,
like
you
know,
actually
literally
synapse
by
synapse
I,
see
people
talk
about
the
connect
them,
but
about
every
single
connection,
but
it
is
a
connect
on
like
conductivity
Norma.
It's
really
a
region,
the
region,
graph
conductivity
and
trying
to
make
some
distinctions
about
what
speed
follower
and
once
feedback,
but
they're,
also
including
the
pharmacological
cortical
connections,
which
was
not
included
at
all
in
the
original.
D
E
A
D
E
D
A
He's
really
we've
talked
about
his
work
here.
A
lot
he's
the
first
people,
pretty
him
right,
Gillard
or
whatever
so
alive,
were
two
people
really
sort
of
articulated
a
cohesive
some
understanding
about
what
the
anatomy
through
the
families
should
be
considered,
and
it's
not
what
most
people
think
but
good
evidence
that
they're
right,
it's
sort
of
like
let's
ride
what
the
issue
here
like
these
loose
yeah,
some
people
think
but
not
not
loose.
Sherman
I'll
tell
you
why
they're
not
losing
either
that
you
want
to.
C
C
A
Know
just
as
a
general
rule,
more
more
work
has
been
moving
towards
rodents,
and
these
you
know,
for
various
reasons.
Monkeys
are
doable
to
work
with
and
expensive
and
there's
a
lot
of
ethical
concerns
about
it,
and
so
and
now,
when
I'm,
all
these
great
tools
for
mice
and
rodents,
and
so
this
yeah
sorry.
A
Is
this
represents
the
visual
system
of
the
macaque
using
your
cortex?
Each
little
rectangle
is
a
region
of
the
new
york
or
text.
The
eye
input
from
the
eye
is
coming
from
the
bottom
of
the
picture:
retina
through
LG
n,
then
2,
v,
1,
v,
2
and
so
on
and
the
the
lines
the
blue
lines
on
this
represent
bundles.
A
Massive
bundles
of
nerve
fibers,
drawn
between
the
regions,
and
so
they
show
this
as
sort
of
a
hierarchy,
their
ways
of
saying,
Oh,
v3
or
the
same
level
or
something
like
that.
But
reality.
If
you
follow
these
lines,
you
see
that
that's
a
largely
artificial
distinction
and
that
regions
are
projecting
all
over
the
place.
Sorry,
but
it's
up
and
down.
You
know
it's
skinny
levels.
It's.
D
A
E
C
E
D
A
A
And
then
he
projects
to
the
first
region
of
the
cortex
and
in
the
feminine
Vanessa
diagram
we
go
slow
before
they
shall
o
that
region
connects
to
this
region
predicts
in
this
region.
Context
of
this
region
this
week
ago
is
also
feedback
from
Steve
following
feedback,
but
felling
Vanessa
ignore
all
the
talents
but
turned
out
that
this
caught
of
this
LGN
first
order
of
town
linkage
is
really
just
one
of
many
timing
relay
centers
that
are
all
serving
a
similar
purpose.
C
D
D
A
So
the
old
view
would
be
like
this:
is
they
call
the
founders
to
Gateway
to
the
cortex,
like
the
whole?
Information
from
the
senses
goes
through
this
line,
I
mean
then
it's
all
important,
that's
not
true
at
all
and
if
you
think
about
the
idea
of
the
Common
Core
aligned
with
and
that's
kind
of
hard
to
justify,
but
this
is
much
more
accessible.
It's
not
what
people
mean
by
these.
A
No,
these
are
specific.
Climate
neutral
I
did
not
specific
in
a
moment,
okay,
so
these
are
the
specific
well.
These
are.
These
are
like
the
in
Thomas,
and
even
in
the
paper
we
just
looked
at
from
the
from
the
Sony
Islands
to
do.
They've
talked
about
the
thalamus
three
types
of
things
in
the
Thomas,
you
got,
you
got,
nonspecific
you've
got
matrix
and
you
got
the
specific
genomic.
These
are
just
a
specific
moment
in
five
apartment.
A
A
With
the
cortex,
but
instead
we're
stretching
all
the
way
over
the
cortex,
you
put
them
in
one
little
place
in
the
center.
It's
a
way
of
bringing
it
you
sort
of
the
bottom
layer
of
the
cortex
down
the
one
thing
down
here.
That's
how
I
view
it,
but
anyway,
then
then
enemy.
It
makes
the
system
much
more
complicated
because
you
do
at
least
direct
connections,
but
you
also
have
these
connections
to
the
founders,
which
seem
to
be
the
driver.
So
really
like
this.
A
D
A
D
D
Couple
important
points-
one
is
not
shown
here,
but
what
is
shown
here
is
that
the
traditional
view
is
that
you
have
be
one
projected
you
know,
go
through
several
cortical
regions
and
then
there's
a
motor
cortex,
which
then
projection
motor
areas
all
right.
So
this
is
controlling
motor
function.
If.
D
A
Everybody's
children-
oh
he
said
everywhere-
we've
walked.
We
found
later
five
thousand
projects,
importantly
to
some
motor
and
they
look
at
pretty
much
everything
so
yeah
he
has
it.
Every
section
of
the
cortex
is
a
sense
of
where
the
input,
outputs
or
sensory
motor
autonomously,
sensory,
but
it's
a
it's
a
input
motor
system
and
and
that
the
distinction
between
motor
cortex
and
motor
cortex,
the.
E
A
Cortex
and
one
sub
area,
only
one
bite,
that's
one
way
of
looking
at
it
first
and
it's
worse
than
that.
It
turns
out
that
if
you
look
at
the
businesses
new
one
v2
and
v4,
for
example-
write
that
these
neurons
here
that
reject
a
layer
4
here
some
of
them
rejected
here
and
some
of
them
reject
the
year
as
well.
It's
the
Sun
crossover.
E
D
E
D
A
D
D
E
A
Here,
that's
just
suggesting
it's
not
a
driver
is
the
module
Ettore
thing,
but
you're
ten
times
as
many
farmers
projecting
back
this
way,
then
there
are
injecting
forwards.
This
is
a
very
massive
projection
bang,
but
it
seems
to
have
this
so
very
difficult
to
interpret
results
here
and
in
these,
so
these
projections
project
onto
this,
this
inhibitory
matrix
here
the
following
particular
Dakotas
and
they
also
project
onto
the
distal
part
of
the
relay
cells.
But
these
are
very
complex
rejections
and
these
are
the
users
these
draw
me
or
see.
A
A
Here
and
then
these
very
unusual
synaptic
kalam,
you
arrived,
and
so
without
going
into
the
details
of
right
now
they
they
suggest
that
this
these
are.
These
are
like
one,
the
one
output,
that's
what
they
cope
realize.
Then
you
get
one
axon
and
you
get
one
x.
How
I
was
like
one-to-one
there's
this
very
usual
brain,
but
if
she
complex
common,
try
and
there's
multiple
ones
on
these
cells-
and
it
looks
to
us
as
if
this
could
be
like
a
that.
A
A
And
I've
also
come
to
believe
there's.
Another
thing
is
going
on
here
and
I:
give
it
a
much
better
than
50%
chance.
It's
correct,
but
it
much
at
all
is
I
believe
that
another
thing
that's
going
on
between
these
two
is:
there's
an
establishment
about
a
gamma
frequency
and
I,
convinced
myself,
at
least
that
that
one
thing
that
it's
happening
here
is
that
that
the
thalamus
is
able
to
scale
movement
and
behaviors
by
changing
that
frequency
and
that
frequency
that
you
might
be
driving
the
and
so
there's
a
there's,
a
scaling
factor
e.
A
So
when
you
attend
to
something
you
not
only
maybe
you're
suddenly
restricted,
you
can
put
you're
getting.
You
may
be
multiplexing
and
remapping
it
and
you're
also
scaling
it
at
the
same
time,
and
in
the
reason
you
want
to
do
that,
and
a
centralized
thing
like
the
thalamus
is
that
you
wanna
you
want
to
basically
you've
got
this
large
distributed
cortex
and
it's
not
really
connected
together.
A
This
might
very
well
but
down
here
this
alignment
of
nucleus,
which
establishes
this
one
for
establishing
that
Gamma
frequency
he's
not
well
Cole,
okay,
and
so
what
you
can
do
is
you
can
establish
in
a
sort
of
an
attentional
system
and
a
scaling
system
localizing
the
thalamus
that
then
pertains
to
all
cortical
regions
and
that's
also
where
the
matrix
cells
come
into
play
and
the
nonspecific
farmers.
Also
it's
a
it's
very
complex
system
and
we
have
some
ideas
at
what
it's
doing
about
it's
very
speculative
in.
A
But
my
understanding,
those
exact
words
that,
using
that
paper
or
words
that
appeared
many
decades
ago,
specifically
have
right
here
this
reciprocal
loops,
right
and
I
talked
to
scientists.
Thank
you
to
go
about
this
and
what
they
thought
was
they
didn't
at
that
time
they
didn't
realize
it
was
this
sort
of
the
way
this
was
they
just
said:
oh
look,
this
self-projection
the
psalmist
and
then
the
founders
reject
backs,
and
so
they
just
sort
of
hand.
A
Wavey
said:
there's
he's
loose,
they
didn't
understand
the
second
nuclei
and
that
there's
really
a
fee
for
power
to
it.
It's
a
it's
sort
of
like
old
language
and
memories.
I
think
you
know
they
have
this
idea
that
this
connection
here,
which
makes
appearance'
some
houses,
you
simply
look
going
on
and
it's
doing
something
and
that
doesn't
kind
of
all.
We
see.
D
A
When
still
about
drugs,
you
could
hear
you're
going
through
the
thalamus,
so
even
in
the
old
way,
very
old
way
of
taking
the
trance
flammond
appeared
about
the
heater
that
you
know
through
the
South
Africa.
So
there's
this
direct
cortical
corner
and
there's
cortical
phenomena
cortical
and
those
are
the
two
basic
feed-forward
pathways
and
a
little
bit
puzzled
by
you
be
using
the
gamma
for
describing
like
infra
granularly
activity,
which
tends
to
be
much
lower
than
and
I
didn't
make
this
distinction
between
upper
and
lower
layers.
My
questions
no.
A
A
They're
basically
reject
broadly
over
a
large
area
cortex
to
layer,
one
in
which
they
should
affect
layer,
five
cells
and
anybody
else
they
might
connect
to
up
there.
So
it's
it's
it's
difficult
to
say
what
what
what
particular
layers
they're
impacting,
but
as
soon
as
they
give
me
a
layer
five,
it
could
be
upper
layers.
A
But
it's
this
broad
connection,
so
you
have
very
few
cells
that
reject
broadly
across
a
particular
modality,
so
at
a
matrix,
L
is
envisioned,
would
cross
v1
and
v2
broad,
maybe
four,
but
not
auditory,
ER
or
something
on
them.
So
you
can
in
theory
here
your
establishment
control
over
the
entire
visual
system
or
the
type
auditory
system
or
the
entire
techno
system.
A
B
Hf,
yes
about
the
first
paper
you're
looking
at
you,
you
mentioned
you
thought
it
had
a
lot
a
little
more
data,
I
think
that
it
had
conclusions
and
I
was
wondering
if
the
publication,
at
least
of
the
data
might
be
used
for
other
researchers
to
come
in
and
make
some
more
interesting
conclusions
in
a
later
time.
Well,.
B
A
If
I
recall
what
they
said
in
the
paper,
they
said
that
this
now
presents
a
new
baseline,
for
which
the
studies
can
be
made,
so
they
were
seeing
more
like.
Okay,
this
is,
you
know,
would
just
advance
the
the
anatomic
come
activities
being
here.
Obviously,
I
think
every
scientist
hopes
you
could
explain
itself,
but
that
wasn't
they.
E
How
does
that
work
effectively?
But
how
do
you
just
share
these
big
tables
of
you
know
epsps
in
a
micro
circuit?
How
do
you
share
these
big
tables
of
connections
and
make
people
understand
and
use
them
when
they
build
a
cortex
models
right
and
we
own
them?
Or
you
know?
How
does
that
communication
work,
because
it's
really
tricky
and
you.
A
People's
interpretation
of
these
things-
and
you
just
have
to
build
your
own,
an
internal
model.
What
what
might
be
important?
What's
not
important
like
we
don't
we
focus
on
the
salon
or
a
lot
of
people
just
ignore
completely,
but
you
know
there's
logic
behind
that,
but
is
very
subjective.
So
genuine
question
I
mean
no
I,
don't
think,
there's
any
sort
of
proper
way
to
the
digest.
All
this
data
you
just
have
to
like
make
diagrams
you
don't
do
with
diagrams
look
at
it.
There's
a
moment
is
finding
the
right
words,
but.
A
D
Connections,
okay,
yeah
and
the
thing
that
kind
of
bugs
me
also
is
that
you
know
if
you
just
draw
the
wiring
diagram
whatever
it
completely
ignores
the
dendritic
functions.
The
functionality
of
the
projection
down
here
is
very
different
from
the
functionality
of
the
v4
projections
and
there's
very
specific
dendritic
characteristics
understand
it.
So
it's
not
just
all
clock
neurons,
the
immediate
weighted
sums
of
stuff,
damn
I'm.
E
A
A
A
E
A
A
A
This
basic,
you
can
start
with
test,
you
know,
slicing
dead
tissue
and
standing
it.
Then
you
can
slice
the
tissue
that
cuts
through
the
cortex
and
thalamus
preserving
some
of
these
connection
right.
They
need
you
slice.
You
know
the
in
vitro
studies,
right,
you're,
cutting
off
a
lot
of
stuff,
but
other
still
large,
and
that's
how
a
lot
of
the
farm
at
work
was
not
most
of
slices.
D
D
You
know
one
of
the
challenges
of
doing
ceramic
stuff
is
you
could
do
all
the
tracing
that
sort
of
static?
You
know
trying
to
do
in
vivo
recordings
of
this
stuff
when
the
response
properties
of
these
neurons
are
quite
different
from
pyramidal
cells,
and
so
even
spike
sorting
is
actually
quite
challenging,
Alamos
and
and
the
algorithms
that
work
for
the
cortex
don't
work
down
here
and
they're.
Very
few
people
have
actually
even
studied
that
problem,
see
even
knowing
when
a
neuron
is
firing
and
not
firing.
It's
actually
quite
tricky.
A
A
To
amalgamate
them,
I
think
what
Serge
I
mentioned
earlier
is
classic
example
of
this
anatomically.
You
can
look
at
the
numerical
connections
and
all
those
ten
times
as
many
fibers
going
back
is
forward,
but
physiologically
very
hard
to
think
of
them.
But
you
know
this
thing
yeah
and
so
so
off
into
which
what
you're
looking
at
it,
you
know
you'll
just
ignore
and.
E
Then,
for
me,
on
top
of
that,
because
I
was
looking
at
what
a
memory-
it's
not
just
like
how
many
connections
are
there
and
that
week
for
people
like
me
who
study
fast
plasticity,
the
question
always
also
always
like.
Oh
it
can
that
strong
silence.
Actually
people
unrelated
can
it
we
need
each
other
to
we
condiment
to
be
strong
again
for
a
couple
seconds
right.
Well,.
A
A
A
E
C
A
A
A
A
Know
you're
looking
through
all
this
other
material
and
right,
it's
just
very
hard
and
you
have
to
come
up.
Another
problem
is
after
genetic
techniques
require
that
the
the
neurons
expressed
genetically
the
the
photo
sensitive
right,
the
gates
and
so
on,
and
that,
but
they
have
mouth
lines
that
do
that
for
the
cortex
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
think
they
have
mouth.
A
C
A
A
C
C
D
C
A
A
D
C
B
Thanks
for
watching
you
guys,
there
will
most
likely
not
be
a
research
meeting
on
Wednesday,
but
I
think
there
will
be
one
on
Friday.
So
that's
the
plan
so
we'll
keep
doing
this
next
week.
I
am
I'm
currently
working
on
HTM
school
animation,
so
I'm
hoping
pretty
much
sure,
there's
gonna
be
another
HTM
school
video
out
for
the
end
of
the
year,
definitely
for
the
ADEA,
if
you're
interested
in
that.
B
Otherwise
don't
forget
to
visit
our
forum
HTM
forum,
the
link
in
chat
here,
if
you're
interested
in
this
stuff,
we
have
a
very
active
and
kind
friendly,
welcoming
community
of
folks
that
just
want
to
understand
how
intelligence
works
in
the
brain
and
talk
about
their
different
ideas.
So
there's
lots
of
topic
on
this
lots
of
discussion
on
this
type
of
stuff,
on
the
topics
of
hierarchy,
cortical
integrations
with
thalamus
and
etc,
and
also,
lastly,
don't
forget
to
give
this
video
a
like.
Please
all
11
of
you
that
are
watching
right
now.
B
If
you
made
it
all
the
way
through
here.
Hopefully
you
do
the
whole
pitch.
If
you
made
it
through
here,
you're
in
it
here
and
you've
watched
several
of
these
videos,
please
just
give
it
a
like
and
subscribe
like
every
video
you
watched
on
this
channel
that
helps
you
to
promote
the
more
the
more
likes
we
get.
The
more
YouTube
decides
to
promote
the
video
they
have
the
secret
algorithm
that
promotes
the
videos.
So
please,
like
the
video
share
it
with
your
friends,
talk
about
it
on
social
media.
B
We
Numenta
the
company
there
we
go,
there's
not
many
other
companies
that
are
doing
what
we're
doing
right
now.
What
you're
watching
you're
watching
live
research
from
our
headquarters
in
Redwood
City,
with
our
research
team
that
works
on
algorithms
every
day
at
nimita,
and
so
you
get
a
really
relevant
and
current
window
into
the
world
of
research
and
private
neuroscience
company
and
we
think
that's
pretty
cool
so
hopefully
you'll
share
that
I.
B
Don't
think
you'll
find
any
other
companies
doing
this
type
of
cutting-edge
theoretical
neuroscience
research
out
in
the
open
like
this,
so
share
it
share
it
with
anybody
like
and
thanks
for
watching
I'm
gonna
turn
the
stream
off.
Everyone
take
care
and
have
a
wonderful
day,
I'll
be
back
on
Friday
with
another
live
stream.